View
223
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Trabajo de Graduación: Licenciatura Idioma Inglés
Citation preview
UNIVERSIDAD PEDAGOGICA DE EL SALVADOR
FACULTAD DE EDUCACION
SCHOOL OF EDUCATION
Study of the Methodology Applied in the English Teaching Process and
its Relation with the Development of the Oral expression, Section “A”,
10th grade of Bachillerato General, Instituto Nacional Doctor Francisco
Martínez Suárez , Chalatenango , 2007.
Presented by:
Celina Yaneth Cartagena Maldonado
Marta Isabel Torres Torres
Melvin Rolando Rauda Márquez
To obtain the academic degree:
Licenciatura en Ciencias de la Educación con Especialidad en
Idioma Inglés.
ACADEMIC ADVISOR: LIC. IRMA CARBALLO HERNANDEZ San Salvador, El Salvador 2008.
UNIVERSIDAD PEDAGOGICA DE EL SALVADOR
FACULTAD DE EDUCACION
RECTOR:
Ing. Luís Mario Aparicio Guzmán
VICERRECTORA ACADEMICA:
Lic. Catalina Rodríguez de Merino
DECANO DE LA FACULTAD
DE EDUCACION:
Lic. Jorge Alberto Escobar
Dedicated to:
- Almight God to let me finish my career.
- My mother for had showed me the life sense.
- My father and family for been close to me in every moment.
- Licda. Irma Carballo Hernandez for her dedication and time.
- My job partners for their support.
- All my friends and their company.
- Juan Carlos Cortez who work in the Universidad Pedagogica library.
- The evaluation committee and its dedication.
- Universidad Pedagógica de El Salvador Authorities.
Melvin Rolando Rauda Márquez.
Dedicated to:
-Almight God to helped me to obtain the academic degree.
-My mother for her love and support.
-Rafael Vasquez to support me with love and comprehension
-My dearest sons Fabian Alessandro and Franco Paolo.
-All my brothers and sisters for their advices in every moment.
-Licda. Irma Carballo Hernandez and her dedication.
-The A.C.E. and job partners.
-All my friends.
-Universidad Pedagógica de El Salvador.
Marta Isabel Torres Torres.
DEDICATED:
-Principally to almighty God to give me the life and the opportunity to
finish this work.
-My dear father and mother, who gave me all their love, comprehension,
and patience in everything I needed and asked them.
-My dear brothers and sister who always helped me on every moment.
-I also like to thank to my thesis partner Melvin Rolando Rauda and Martha
Isabel Torres who gave me support when things got tough.
Celina Yaneth Cartagena Maldonado
Acknowledgement:
To the authorities, teachers, and students of the institution attended,
because they made it possible to develop the field research.
To the advisor of our thesis work, Licda. Irma Carballo Hernandez.
Our gratitude also goes to the people who work in the UPES`s library,
especially to Juan Carlos Cortez for his patience and kindness to provided
us all the available books referring our research during development of this
work.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I-Conceptual Framework
1.1 General and specific objetives --------------------------------------------------1
1.2 Justification -----------------------------------------------------------------------2
1.3 Statement of the problem --------------------------------------------------------3 - 4
1.4 Goals and Limitations -----------------------------------------------------------5 - 6
1.5 Concepts and categories --------------------------------------------------------7 - 9
II- Theoretical Framework
2.1 Theoretical Methodological Basis --------------------------------------------10 - 26
2.2 Empirical Framework -----------------------------------------------------------27 - 40
2.3 Theoretical Methodological
Formulation of the research ---------------------------------------------------------41 - 44
2.4 Development and Theoretical Definition -------------------------------------45 - 47
III- Operational Framework
3.1 Description of the subjects of the research -------------------------------------48 - 50
3.2 Data gathering procedure ---------------------------------------------------------51 - 76
3.3 Specification of the technique for the data analysis ---------------------------77
3.4 Chronogram -------------------------------------------------------------------------78 - 80
3.5 Resources ----------------------------------------------------------------------------81
3.6 Preliminary table contexts on final report ---------------------------------------82 - 83
3.7 Bibliography used to develop the research --------------------------------------84
3.8 Attachments
INTRODUCTION
The present research deals with a study of the methodology applied in the English teaching
process and its relation with the development of the oral expression in section “A” for 10th
grade of bachillerato general Instituto Nacional Doctor Francisco Martínez Suárez,
Chalatenango, 2007.
The research project was being carried out, to observe the methodologies used by the
teacher to develop the oral expression; and it was also observed some students’ interest in
the oral expression learning. The information recompiled helped us to determine if the
methodologies used by the teacher with the students in the classroom were appropriate to
develop the oral expression.
On the other hand, this research will let the readers know about the methodologies and
activities applied by the teacher in the English class and the development of the students’
expressivity.
The purpose was to identify the methodologies used by the English teacher to develop the
oral expression and how the study categories were included in the development of the
research. These are: methodology, oral expression and methodological process.
In this research we analyzed some linguistic and pedagogical theories that guided the
research in order to obtain wide information related to the topic.
The first draft research contains in its draft: general and specific objectives, justification,
statement of the problem, goals and limitations, concepts and categories.
The second draft includes the theoretical methodological basis, on which it was based after
having consulted different authors’ point of view in the field of the English language
teaching, and how its Empirical Framework was elaborated, this includes students
population, method, techniques and instruments used to collect the data.
The third draft contains: The description of the subject of the research, Data gathering
procedure, Specification of the technique for the data analysis, a Chronogram, Resources,
Preliminary table of contents on final report and attachments.
1.1 Objectives
General:
To know the methodologies used by the teacher in the English class and its relation with
students’ oral expression performance.
Specific:
To identify the methodological process and the elements used by the teacher to associate its
relation to make the students develop the oral expression in English.
1.2 Justification
This research is necessary to be done because it is well known that high school Salvadoran
students do not speak English with the expected fluency as a result of some factors related
to the English teaching methodology applied, students’ interest and others.
These factors affect them because it reduces the opportunities chances to get a good job and
a higher education due to the lack of the mastering of the language, maybe in the other
skills they should get an acceptable level but not in speaking, therefore speaking is the most
difficult skill to develop. That is why it is very important to pay attention to the
methodological process of how teachers of English are teaching this language.
We will focus the research especially in the goal of studying the methodology applied by
the teacher in the English class in progress. At the same time we will realize if through the
elements the teacher uses from this methodology the high school students get an acceptable
level in the oral expression according to the course they are taking.
This research will be helpful to know the English oral expression level in the students of
tenth grade section “A” Instituto Nacional Doctor Francisco Martínez Suárez,
Departamento de Chalatenango. This also makes a good means to find out how a teacher of
English makes his students learn English more effectively in terms of the techniques of
some of the most common methods to teach English altogether with available resources,
and identify the teaching methodology to develop the students’ oral expression.
Nowadays the English language is a fundamental academic field in modern students who
are the real diagnostic of the English teaching process, toward a new technology era.
1.3 Statement of the problem
In El Salvador English is a mandatory subject in the educative system from seventh grade
to High School, in public schools Salvadoran students do not speak English with the
expected fluency due to the lack of language produced by the teaching methodology,
students’ interest and others.
The Salvadoran Ministry of Education does not pay attention to this and it is only in private
schools where English is taught in lower than seventh grades.
As it is true there are good theories about teaching methodology to help teachers orient
their job in the English language classroom, there is a problem present in some classrooms.
That is maybe because many teachers do not manage the apropriate methodologies to
develop students’ oral expression.
This could be so probably because they have not been appropriately instructed in both
practically and theoretically, or even because some of the teachers are not specialists in the
field.
This occurs in the public system because the government has never shown much interest in
the quality of Education in many years. Even though this has changed just a little bit
recently, because of the changes around the world demand more qualified people working
on the field of the English language teaching. The teaching of English language from
seventh grade to bachillerato is stated in the technical progressive challenges of the
Ministry of Education especially in the human communication field.1
1Verónica del Carmen Vásquez, Jennifer Carolina Bonilla, Juan Antonio Ramírez.”Reaches and limitations of the constructivist
methodology proposed in the English program of junior high. 2006. Pag.12.
The English curriculum is based on the integration of a variety of innovating techniques of
teaching all of which emphasize the development of comprehension and production of oral
expression
1.4 Goals and Limitations
Goals:
On one hand, there is the fact that there was a bibliographical research done on the different
points of view of some of the most recognized authors on the field of English language
teaching. For example: in the book written by Margarita Ravera Carreño, Didácticas de las
segundas lenguas estrategias y recursos básicos, she mentions that “the interlingual
development is any process in which anyone who is learning a language in order to master
it as a native speaker is who must go through to do so”.2 She also establishes that in the
process of natural acquisition of the foreign language a child develops his speaking skill
and fluency without learning any grammatical rules explicitly.
On the other hand, the communicative method represented by the Britain school
(Widdowson, Long) proposed “the oral practice and group work as a way so the students
manage the language develop the communicative skill and learn the language.”3
According to Teun Van Dijk “in the teaching-learning process those students who learn the
first language the same as the students learning the second or foreign language used to mix
up styles or registers, a typical example is the use of written text books of expressions or
idiomatic phrases used only through the oral expression.”4
In addition to the former the linguistic theory by Dell Hymes is concerned primarily with
an ideal speaker, listener in a completely homogeneous speech community, who knows its
language perfectly and is unaffected by such: grammatically irrelevant condition as
memory limitation, distraction, shift of attention and interest.
__________________ 2 Didácticas de las segundas lenguas estrategias y recursos básicos, Editorial Santillana 1990, pag.14. 3 4El discurso como estructura y proceso.Editorial Gedisa, Barcelona Espana, 1997.pag.226
4 Idem.
LIMITATIONS
Among the limitations found to carry out the research is the lack of bibliography related to
the topic, in which researches found difficulties to collect data. Among the few information
found exist different points of view of some authors such as: Margarita Ravera Carreño,
where she establishes that in the process of natural acquisition of the first language a child
develops the speaking skill and fluency without learning any grammatical rules explicitly.
On the contrary some authors (Pinemann, Ellis) state that besides the understandable
language is necessary to teach explicitly grammar to accelerate and improve the foreign
language acquisition quality5.
On one side, Pinemann states to teach explicitly grammar only when the students are able
to use the language in advance. On the other side, Ellis states to teach grammar rules but
not forces to use it. According to him students are able to apply the rules in a natural way.
Theirs theories are not in a complete agreement, which causes problems at the moment of
analyzing the different methodologies used to develop the students’ oral expression.
5 Didácticas de las segundas lenguas estrategias y recursos básicos, Editorial Santillana 1990, pag 18.
1.5 Concepts and categories
The research that will be studied comprises different definitions.
According to the MacMillan dictionary, methodology consists of “the methods and
principles used for doing a particular kind of word, especially scientific or academic
research”.6
On the other hand, El Diccionario de las Ciencias de la Educación explains that
methodology “is the theory of the method that studies the reason that let us understand a
method.7
In our opinion, methodology is that element which links theory and practice, the one that
comprises many steps such as: methods, strategies, techniques, activities, dynamics and
sources that the teacher has to apply with the students in the classroom to develop the oral
expression.
Jean Piaget mentioned “that methodology is that meaningful learning in which students
modify their knowledge”8. He focused on the roles that learners learn a language through
using it in an authentic and meaningful communication that should be the goal of classroom
activities. From another point of view Kant and Rabidanat Tagore claimed “we don’t
have to teach about philosophy to students, but rather how to do it” or “you don’t have to
feed people with fish but teach people how to get it”.9
6 MacMillan Dictionary. Macmillan Publishers Limited 2002.pag. 882. 7 Diccionario de las ciencias de la educación, Editorial Santillana S. A., Madrid, España 1983. 8 Didáctica de las segunda lengua estrategia y recursos básicos. Editorial Santillana, 1990.
9 Creando formas efectivas de enseñar y aprender, Editores montañas de fuego, San Salvador 2002, pag .62.
It means that the teaching process guided by teachers must be designed or planned in order
to make students develop their independent learning.
In addition to, the Macmillan Dictionary defines method as “the way of doing something,
Especially a planned or established way”10. In our opinion, method is a systematic set of
teaching practices based on a particular theory of language and language learning.
Methods are held to be fixed teaching systems with prescribed techniques and practice can
be interpreted and applied in a variety of different ways in the classroom.
Oral Expression “is a person’s ability to express ideas when speaking so that others will
understand the message”11.
From our point of view oral performance is the ability and right to speak free and clearly
unashamed, to fully vocalize to choose to make contact with a word and to communicate
that word successfully.
Oral Expression involves perceiving, recalling and articulating in the correct order sound
and structures of the language, sounding like a native speaker even producing the right
sound.
Dell Hymes created the term of communicative outcome; he focused on the linguistic
knowledge in the cultural aspect of community. On the other hand, Noam Chomsky
(American Linguist) showed the oral expression is the skill speakers develop through their
language.
10 Mac Millan Dictionary. Macmillan Publishers Limited 2002. pag. 882.
11 http://www.jobaccess.gov.au/joac/advice/jobrequirementthree/oral_expression.htm
Chomsky valued the mental and innate characters in the acquisition of oral expression. To
get the former the teacher is active in setting up classroom situations while the students do
most of the talking and interaction among themselves.
Teun Van Dijk is also an important linguist. He focused on acts of speech can produce
different sounds, in which the learner repeats patterns and phrases in the language
laboratory.
In the teaching-learning process those students who learn the first language the same as the
students learning the second or foreign language use to mix up styles or registers, a typical
example is the use of written text books of expressions or idiomatic phrases used only
through the oral expression.
In all the international relation areas and the intercultural communication, either the written
texts books or oral interactions the style is a fundamental dimension.
The abstract explanations like the most concrete of the word order, the meaning of the
sentences, coherence and narrative schemes of the speech acts or the own interaction of the
conversation always suppose that the language user has a previous knowledge of the
language.
In our opinion the term oral expression is basically that linguistic capability that enables to
express with clarity, fluency and coherence among others.
II Theoretical framework
2.1 Theoretical Methodological Basis
Introduction
Methodology in English teaching has been characterized in a variety of ways “A more or
less classical formulation suggests that methodology links theory and practice, within
methodology a distinction is often made between methods and approaches. Methods are
held to be fixed in teaching and they can be practiced, interpreted and applied in a variety
of ways in the classroom.
Learning a foreign language is a complex process that involves an infinite number of
variables from which we are going to take some of them into account!”12
The research studied some of the most important points of view of some authors in the field
of English language teaching and learning.
Methodology
According to Jean Piaget methodology “is that meaningful learning in which students
modify their knowledge through using it in an authentic and meaningful communication”.13
When we pay attention to this definition provided by Jean Piaget, it can be perceived that
learners learn a language through using it, in an authentic and meaningful communication
that should be the role of classroom activities when we say that methodology is
“meaningful communication” we are based on meaningful acquisition of grammar
structures followed by meaningful practice.
12 http://www.cal.org/resources/Digest/rodgers.html
13 Didáctica de las segunda lengua estrategia y recursos básicos. Editorial Santillana, 1990.
When we take into account the idea expressed by Piaget where he states that teaching
methodology modifies the students knowledge, it means that students learn and change
their behavior through meaningful learning.
David Ausubel contended that learning takes place in the human organism through a
meaningful process of relating new events or items to already existing cognitive concepts
or propositions.
(Anderson and Ausubel 1965) it is this relatability that, according to Ausubel, accounts for
a number of phenomena: the acquisition of new meanings (knowledge), retention, the
psychological organization of knowledge as a hierarchical structure, and the eventual
occurrence of forgetting.
Meaningful Learning, on the other hand, may be described as a process of relating and
anchoring new material to relevant established entities in cognitive structure.
Meaningful Learning is the process whereby blocks become an integral part of already
established categories or systematic cluster.
Meaningful Learning can be if, a) Learners have a meaningful learning set that is a
disposition to relate the new learning task to what they already know and b) The Learning
task itself is potentially meaningful to the learners that is, relatable to the learners’ structure
of knowledge.
The researchers believe teaching methodology modifies students’ knowledge, many times
we think that in the teaching-learning process the fundamental factor was the teacher and
the way how to teach, replaced the students in a passive position like a receptor in the
classroom. However there exists an understanding toward the students.
Since Jean Piaget stated that teaching methodology modifies students’ knowledge we see in
modern years where studies and technology are fast and efficient, in the classroom the
methodology has changed and we can see a new methodology where the students play a
more active role but always guided by the teacher, students should use the knowledge to
increase the logical ability to be able to do simple and complex activities, in other words
the students use “learning by doing”. Using the new methodology modifies students’
knowledge because if there exist an understanding they are to understand the knowledge.
Mistakes and ignorance disappear through out doing by themselves guiding by the teacher
all of this help to be confident.
On the other hand, Kimble and Garmezy a research in contemporary dictionaries reveals
that “learning is “acquiring or getting” of knowledge of a subject or a skill by study,
experience or instruction.” A more specialized definition might read as follows:”Learning
is a relatively permanent change in a behavioral tendency and is the result of the reinforced
practice”14 Kimble and Garmezy Similarly, teaching, which is implied in the first definition
of learning, may be defined as “showing or helping someone to learn how to do something,
living instructions, guiding in the study of something provided with knowledge, causing to
know or understand.”15. How awkwarding these definitions are, isn’t it curious that
professional lexicographers cannot devise more precise scientific definitions?
14 Principles of Language Learning and Teaching H. Douglas Brown. Longman editor (2000) San Francisco
State University. Page7.
15 Idem.Page.7.
more than perhaps anything else, such H. Douglas Brown definitions reflect the difficulty
of the defining complex concepts like learning and teaching.
Breaking down the components of the definition of learning, we can extract, as we did with
language, domains of research and inquiry.
1-Learning is acquisition or “getting.”
2-Learning is retention of information or skill.
3-Retention implies storage systems, memory, and cognitive organization.
4-Learning involves active, conscious focus on and action upon events outside or inside the
organism.
5-Learning is relatively permanent but subject to forgetting.
6-Learning involves some form of practice, perhaps reinforced practice.
7-Learning is a change in behavior”.
The researchers’ point of view the definition of learning provided by H. Douglas Brown
presents clear and very important points that we should take into account, some of these,
among others are:
-Learning is an acquisition process.
-Learning deals with the retention of the information or skill.
-Retention of learning deals with memory and other mental processes.
-Learning is usually permanent by subject forgetting by anyone.
H. Douglas Brown definition on learning concept shows a no clear idea to define it,
learning is the production of a specific methodology and here the author mentions some
points where he expresses a doubtely way to define the word learning.
He focuses the word learning in a list of two circumstances between acquisition or getting;
acquisition is to make through a systematic process with a significant result and getting is
the act of receiving in a natural way; learning is retention of information or skill, he
establishes learning is only a memorist issue of the retention skill. He also mentions that
retention is not only a memory whether it is a systematic and organized storage, in his final
idea he coincided a little with Jean Piaget when H. Douglas Brown mentions that learning
is a change in behavior; therefore if you change you behave. It means something inside you
is changing these changes modify your knowledge if your mind changes your body changes
and they modify your life.
Likewise in much of the work of researchers on the application of both learning and
communication strategies and communication strategies to classroom learning has come to
be known generically as strategies-based instruction(SBI) (Mc Donough 1999, Cohen
1998), or as learner strategy training. As we seek to make the language classroom an
effective milieu for learning, it has become increasingly apparent that “teaching learners
how to learn” is crucial. Weden (1985) was among the first to assert that “learning
strategies are the key to learner autonomy, and one of the most important goals of language
teaching should be the facilitation of that autonomy”.16
Teachers can benefit from an understanding of what learners successfully make and
establish in the classroom milieu for the realization of successful strategies. They can also
get benefits from unsuccessful strategies.
16 Idem.page.130.
Our opinion is (Mc Donough 1999 and Cohen 1998) states in the work of researchers as a
result of those issues in the application of learning and communicative strategies. It is a
combination of teaching-learning process strategies and socialization, communication
strategies when it is possible to combine them and use them in the classroom activities.
These strategies are known as Strategies Based Instruction (SBI) wherein the teacher and
students create a learning and communication sunroof in the classroom with the objective
to communicate in a teaching-learning process or as a learner strategy training looking for
an effective milieu classroom learning finding an easy way.
In the same idea of the communication ability in the classroom, Weden (1985) referred to
the students’ autonomy which is reached only by a trueful job made by themselves and as a
result of confidence and own effort. We think all of these factors can help to teachers to
determine the goals of the successful learners their abilities, weaknesses and strengthens
working with a specific methodology and its benefits at the same time doing the same with
the unsuccessful learners and its reasons.
Teachers cannot always expect instant success in that effort since students often bring
with them certain preconceived notions of what “ought” to go in the classroom
(Bialystok1985). We think that in a competitive education system wherein everybody who
spends money, time and effort expect to get early and prosperous results evening schools,
teachers need to be patient with the students and try to adapt to their approaching rhythm
without expecting excellent results, in every institution we should respect it meanwhile
students need to receive a lot of motivation and show interest and certain preconceived
notions of what ought to do in classroom because this help them in an easy way to
socialize itself and the environment alike the abilities in study and enough mental
matureness to assimilate the ideas and processes.
However it has been found that students will benefit from SBI (student based instruction) if
they “(a) understand the strategy itself, (b) perceive it to be effective, and (c) do not
consider its implementation to be overly difficult (Macintyre and Noels 1996). Therefore
our efforts to teach students some technical knowledge about how to tackle a language is
well advised”.17
On the other hand several different models of (SBI) strategies based instruction are now
being practiced in language classes around the World.
1-As part of a Standard communicative methodology, teachers help students to become
aware of their own style referents and the strategies that are derived from those styles
(Thompson and Rubin1996, Oxford 1990). Through checklists, tests, and interviews,
teachers can become aware of student’s tendencies and then offer advice on beneficial in-
class and extra-class strategies.
2-Teachers can embed strategy awareness and practice into their pedagogy (Rubin and
Thompson 1994: Brown 1989, 1990: Ellis and Sinclair 1989) as they utilize such
techniques as communicative games, fast reading, fluency exercises, and error analysis,
teachers can help students both consciously and subconsciously to practice successful
strategies.
17 Idem.page.130.
3-Certain compensatory techniques are sometimes practiced to help students overcome
certain weaknesses, Omigo (1981).
Thompson provided diagnostic instruments and procedures for determining student’s
preferences, then outlined exercises that help students to overcome certain blocks or to
develop successful strategies where they are weak.
In order to understand the current paradigm shift in language teaching, it will be useful to
examine what is meant by some commonly used terms–words like method, approach,
technique and procedure, what is method? Four decades ago “Edward Anthony (1963
gave us a definition that has withstood the test of time. His concept of method was the
second of three hierarchical elements, namely, approach, method, technique. An approach
according to Anthony is a set of assumptions dealing with the nature of language, learning,
and technique. Method is an overall part plan for systematic presentation of language based
upon a selected approach. Techniques are the specific activities manifested in the
classroom, which are consistent with a method and therefore in harmony with an approach
as well.”18
In our opinion the (SBI) is a useful tool in the training strategies in the classroom that
become very effective if students and all the learners play the correct role when the SBI
should make an understandable issue for students that means show clear and direct the
ideas, perception is something that you can see in an environment this should be effective,
18 Idem.page.169
also students need to think that the implementation is not difficult whether it is a way to get
an excellent result in the teaching-learning process.
There are some kinds of SBI implemented around the world; in other words there are places
where exist a standard communicative methodology where teachers help students to be
aware in all aspects but majorly in the academic aspect focusing in their own style and
become more prepared and efficient, the strategies are coming from the styles created by.
Thompson and Rubin 1996 Oxford emphasized the styles in checklist, test and interviews,
these strategies help to be aware through out giving advice in class: teachers can practice
awareness practicing pedagogy into communication, games, for reading problems it is to
implement the rapid reading at the same time they improve the fluency in fluency exercises.
Besides, analysis errors is a double chance to learn because you correct and repair it. After
many times to work under the (SBI) finally teachers help consciously and subconsciously
to practice successful strategies.
However, certain compensatory techniques are practiced to help students overcome
weaknesses, teachers provide diagnostic instruments that measure the learning level in the
students, those are medullar parts toward to know it, and young students enjoy to learn in a
funny way and for this issue teachers apply procedures determining students’ preferences.
The author mentions it is important to understand very well the word method; the word
method has a little history when Edward Anthony in 1963 gave a definition that withstood
with the time, named as a the second of the three hierarchical concept elements, then
Anthony mentioned that method is a set of assumptions dealing with the nature of
language, learning and technique. The author adds another idea he states that method is an
overall part plan for systematic presentation of language based upon a selected approach; as
it is well known there would be a harmony among the techniques that guide the activities
and the approach.
Up to this day Anthony’s terms are still in common use among language teachers a teacher
may, for example, at the approach level, affirm the ultimate importance of learning in a
relaxed state of mental awareness just above the threshold of consciousness.
Besides through their reformulation, Richards and Rodgers made two principal
contributions to our understanding of the concept of method:
1-They specified the necessary elements of language teaching “design” that had therefore
been left somewhat vague. They named six important features of “design”: objectives,
syllabus (criteria for selection and organization of linguistic and subject-matter content),
activities, learner roles, teacher roles, and the role of instructional materials.
2-Richards and Rodgers nudged us into at last relinquishing the notion that separate,
definable discrete methods are essential building blocks of methodology. By helping us
think in terms of an approach the undergirds in our language designs (or we could say
curricula) which are realized by various procedures (or techniques), we could see that
methods, as we still use and understand the term, are too restrictive, too pre-programmed,
and too “pre-packaged.” Virtually all language teaching methods make the oversimplified
assumption that what teachers “do” in the classroom can be conventionalized into a set of
procedures that fits all contexts. We are now well aware that such situation is clearly not
the case.
Richards and Rodgers’s reformulation of the concept of method “was soundly conceived
however their attempt to give a new meaning to an old term did not catch on in the
pedagogical literature what they would like us to call “method” is more comfortably
referred to, I think as “methodology”, in order to avoid confusion with what we will not
doubtly think of as those separate entities (like Audio-Lingual or Sugesstopedia Methods).
“Methodology” the study of the pedagogical practices in general (including theoretical
underpinnings and related research). Whatever considerations are involved in “how to
teach” is methodology”.19
Our point of view is that Anthony’s idea is still used in a common use of language teachers
inside; these teachers may approach the level using the ultimate importance of learning in a
relaxed state of mental awareness of consciousness. To support this idea Richards and
Rodgers made two principal contributions to understand the concept of the method: their
first statement is referred to the design of teaching language necessary elements wherein
talk about the following elements: objectives (are the purposes of the goals or the
expected final result), syllabus (criteria for selection and organization of linguistic and
subject-matter content), activities (every action made by the students or teachers), learners
role (every action making in the corresponding role), teacher’s role (all activities made by
the teacher in order to guide the students), role of instructional materials (didactic material
focuses to develop all students’ aspects related to the language acquisition).
19 Idem.page.170
In relation to the same idea, Richards and Rodgers nudged us into at last relinquishing the
notion that separate definable discrete, both authors’ reformulate the old concept of the
method is an intent to renovate the concept applied to the new education era but the concept
did not catch on the pedagogical literature possibly the two terms would be misunderstood
in order to avoid confusion with what we will no doubtely think between “method” or
“methodology”, and the authors were explicit when they mentioned the term “method” as a
specific group of activities (Audio-Lingual Method or Sugesstopedia) in comparison of
“methodology” the study of pedagogical practices in general including theoretical
underpinnings and related research.
LANGUAGE TEACHING METHODOLOGY
“According to Albert Marckwardt (1972) the term methodology emerged about quarter of
century ago. With the methodology the teachers can benefit from an understanding
establishing in the classroom a milieu for the strategies”.20
The researchers believe that the definition provided by Albert Marck, is old arisen at the
middle of the century in that time finally someone provided the word methodology and its
application in the classroom; it improved the way to teach and benefit for the teaching-
learning process, the strategies and techniques were better and the study level increased
with these techniques, teachers had an easier way to teach and transmit the knowledge
based on a group of pedagogic activities toward an understandable students issue.
20 Idem.page.13.
According to this, the communicative language teaching is a byword for language teacher
in which it is not easy to categorize into methods and trends. Instead, each teacher is called
on to develop a sound overall approach, to various language classrooms. This approach is a
principled basis upon, which the teachers can shoes particular design and techniques for
teaching a foreign language in a particular context. As teachers utilize such: techniques,
communicative games, fluency exercise and error analysis, these help students consciously
and subconsciously to practice successful strategies.21
We think that it is very difficult to name in concrete what is the best method to teach
foreign language, specifically in English, in which there are several methods and they are
specific to develop any skill by playing different techniques; many teachers use a specific
method and depend on the interest or students’ weaknesses or strengths, teachers can
apply particular design and techniques for teaching a foreign language in a particular
context using: various techniques, communicative games, fluency exercises and error
analysis. These help students consciously and subconsciously to practice successful
strategies.
21 Language Teaching A Scheme for Teacher Education.editor:C:N Candlin and H.G. Widdowson (1987)
page.5.
Speaking as a skill
“Mackey mentions one of the basic problems in foreign language teaching is to prepare
learners to be able to use the language”.22
If we paid attention to this it is obvious that in order to be able to speak a foreign language
it is necessary to know a certain amount of grammar and vocabulary. We produce words
and adapt them to the circumstances. This means making decision rapidly, implementing
them smoothly and adjusting our conversation as unexpected problem appear in our path.
To test whether learners can speak, it is necessary to get them to actually say something, to
do this they must act on knowledge of grammar and vocabulary by giving learners
speaking practice and oral exams. We recognize that there is a difference between
knowledge about language and skill and its use. Speaking is often thought of as a popular
form of expression which uses the unprestigious colloquial register.
In Mackey’s opinion one of the basic problems in foreign “language teaching is to prepare
learners to be able to use the language, teachers need to take into account the student
motivation to learn, the possible skills”23, a foreign language sunroof and an
understandable teacher explanation using diverses strategies, other important points in the
process are grammar and vocabulary they are fundamental if it is really the desire to
improve the vocabulary and as a consequence of practicing English in all the possibilities.
Many times teachers use oral exams in order to measure the oral skill in students, as a
complement they recognize that there is a difference between knowledge about language
and skill and using it (not to speak the foreign language there is not any gratificant
22 Idem, page.6.
23 Idem.pag.3
experience) it has not been the real importance to speaking and center the idea as a
colloquial register.
Speaking is, however, a skill which deserves attention every bit as much as literary skill, in
both first and second language students often need to be able to speak with confidence in
order to carry out many of their most basic transaction.
According to “W. F. Mackey, oral skill involves two basic ways in which something we do
can be seen as a skill: Motor perceptive skills and interaction skills. There exist two
differences between the two. Motor-perceptive skills involve perceiving, recalling and
articulating in the correct order sounds and structures of the language.”24
Oral Expression includes perceiving, recalling and articulating in the correct order sound
and structures of the language, sounding like a native speaker even producing the right
meaning.
There exist a difference between speaking and Oral Expression, speaking limits just to use
certain amount of grammar and a vocabulary to actually say something.
But Oral expression involves not only the use of the right sounds in the right patterns of
rhythm and intonation, but also the choice of words and inflections in the right order to
covey the right meaning. According to these definitions, notice the importance to do the
right things in order to be good at speaking. Choosing the right forms, putting them in the
correct order, sounding as a native speaker, even producing the right meaning.
24 Language Teaching A Scheme for teacher Education, Editor CN Candlin and HG Widdowson Oxford
University Press.1987. Page 7.
This view of language skill influences the list of exercises: model dialogues, pattern
practice, oral drill tables, look and say exercises and oral composition. Researchers think in
many times speaking skill is less practice than reading skill, practicing it is an example of
speaking deficiency even the reading comprehension is very important, as W.F. Mackey
thought in oral skill exist two basic elements these are: motor perception skills but they are
not focused on the same way. Motor perceptive form to receive the world, recalling or
reproduction language in the correct order or sound following the correct structure of the
language oral expression.
This term defines the idea that it is not only the use of sounds in right patterns of rhythm
and intonation; in short it is not only speaking or expressing ideas and according to W.F.
Mackey it is to choose the right forms, put them in the correct order, native intonation he
also they state some important points of the speaking skill such as: model dialogues, pattern
practice, oral drill tables, look and say exercises and oral composition. Interaction skills
involve the ability to use language in order to satisfy particular demands. There are two
demands which can affect the nature of speech: the first of these is related to the internal
conditions of speech; the fact that speech takes place under the pressure of time (processing
conditions). A second kind involves the dimension of interpersonal interaction in
conversation (reciprocity condition). The time contrait can be expected to have observable
effects. It is impossible to distinguish between short speaking turns and “long speaking
turns. Long turns tend to be more prepared-like after dinner speech or a talk on the radio,
Short turns are the most common. In this case the wording and the subject matter tends to
be worked out extempore as the speaking proceeds, activities to help prepare learners for
language use: reading aloud, giving a prepared talk, learning along piece of text or dialogue
by heart, interviewing someone or being interviewed, doing a drill”.25
Our opinion is that the interaction skill involves the ability to use the language in order to
satisfy particular demands, the word interaction comprises the perception senses sight,
hearing, toward to receiving a better English quality in diverse and comprehensive form,
involving personal dimensions of interpersonal dimensions of interpersonal interaction in
conversation derived in two forms: the short speaking turn and long speaking turn separate
both in difficult cases, are separate conditions of the speech, in order to prepare learners to
use the language: reading aloud (that provides intonation and security when speaking ).
25 Language Teaching A Scheme for teacher Education, Editor CN Candlin and HG Widdowson Oxford
University Press.1987. Page 7.
2.2 EMPIRICAL FRAMEWORK
The research project carried out at Instituto Nacional Dr. Francisco Martinez Suarez was
based in the direct observation and analysis of what was observed (methodologies and
techniques used by the teacher to develop the oral expression in the students, as well as a
description, analysis and contrast of what was got with the theory dealing with the topic of
interest).
Here the term “methodology” is conceived in terms of the group of techniques used by the
teacher to develop the students’ oral expression due to the research process took place, it
can be stated that the process used to collect data and represent it statistically was based on
an observation, registration and a description-contrast approach.
To process all the information collected, the researchers used some checklists designed
with the purpose of detailing the elements taken into account to find out how
methodologies used by the teacher of the high school improved the oral expression in the
students. The checklists were designed following the techniques included in each of the
most common methodologies used by the English teacher in order to develop the oral
expression. Such as: Direct Method(conversation practice, Audio Lingual method
(Repetition drill chain drill the communicative language teaching) (language games, role
play) Likewise, to know if students learnt more or better in terms of comprehension of
activities done in the classroom or results gotten in oral exercises provided by the teacher
in the classroom.
All the former is done in such to state the way that if the students practice the oral
expression they will get the expected fluency in English.
This research project was based on the collection of data obtained from different sources
including the job done by the teacher in high school at Instituto Nacional Dr. Francisco
Martinez Suarez.
Population sample
At Instituto Nacional Dr. Francisco Martinez Suarez was developed the present research as
center 10th grade for Bachillerato General, section “A” .with a population of 25 students
their ages were between 17 and 20 years old. The focus of the research was the
methodology applied in the English Teaching Process and its Relation with the
Development of the Oral Expression.
Method used to collect the data.
The method used to collect the data was descriptive, because through this one it was
possible to describe the data and characteristics about the phenomenon that has been
studied. This consisted of registering the ways in which the teacher developed the teaching-
learning process of English language teaching in the high school, section “A” in the
morning shift.
The data collected was analysed in terms of studying the theory available on language
teaching methodology and what it was found in the observation field. This was useful to do
a technical analysis and easier posterior procedure of figuring out and graphically
representing the findings of it. The contrast of theory and practice let the researchers find
out some important conclusions when processing the data collected to transform it into
resulting information to be presented.
Techniques used to collect data
To carry out this research three techniques were put into practice, documentary as well as
the work field. a) The first one refers to the researchers who searched, read and analyzed
information referring to the topic.
b) The second technique was work field referring to observing the English teaching classes
in progress, the English teaching methodology and the collecting of data through the
checklist.
The direct observation in which the researchers observed the English classes tenth grade
section “A” as a sample of the methodology applied by the teacher in the classroom.
The documentary technique was used in this research when the researchers first of all
searched information from some authors in different universities, then we analyzed it.
The work field technique was put into practice by the researchers when they observed the
English classes, registered the information in the checklist.
c) The third technique used was the interview that helped to the research project to gather
important information and know students’ preferences and the English teaching
methodology.
Instruments used to collect data during field observation
The instruments used to develop this study were four. A checklist for the observation of the
teachers’ role, it contained eleven questions with four choices to answer, they were: always,
sometimes, rarely and not visible. (See annex 1).Also the researchers designed a guide for
an oral interview with the teacher to get information about the methodology he used and to
know if it was the most appropriate to develop the students’ oral expression according to
the theory found by the researchers (see annex 2).
It was also designed a ten questions interview questionnaire for the students with three
choices to answer and they were: mucho, poco and nada, this was to explore the idea on
how they felt about their preferences for the English subject, usefulness, as well as the
class methodology. (see annex 3)
A form to gather all the data collected in the three previous checklists was designed as well
(See annex 4).
It is necessary to mention that this instrument was structured and administered in Spanish to
guarantee the truthfulness of the information because through the observations the
researchers could realize the weak level of English students had.
Procedure followed to develop the research project.
The first part of the project was the planning of activities to be done during it lasted
including going to the public school. The school selected was visited to talk with the
principal and the English teacher. They let the permission to develop the research project;
at the same time they knew the purpose of the project.
Simultaneously the researchers got information from different libraries that were visited. it
was also necessary to consult different bibliographic sources, internet links and so forth.
Once the planning of instruments began, the process of field observation and that collection
of data was carried out.
Another important point was that the teacher worked mechanically, he tried to spend the
time in an irrelevant topic.
In the observation process the researchers observed the English class in progress from its
beginning to its end three days a week during the class for six weeks which were observed
by the researchers.
While the research process was being carried out, it was necessary to fill in a form just as
the one showed below.
Research instrument
unit topic
methodology
Technique used
Time spent
Observable
macro skill
students
improved
The form was designed following the syllabus proposed by MINED (the first column
corresponds to the unit to be developed, in this case unit 4; the second one corresponds to
the topic to be taught, the third one corresponds to the methodology applied by the teacher,
the fourth corresponds to the group of techniques used to develop the class, fifth
corresponds to the time spent in the activities, the last column belongs to the macro-skill
developed by the students after the teacher used the two methodologies in turn to teach
them the contents already mentioned as well as how many students passed a written
evaluation on the topics studied in class.
CHECK LIST TO OBSERVE THE TEACHING METHODOLOGY USED IN THE ORAL EXPRESSION IN THE
CLASSROOM.
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DOCTOR FRANCISCO MARTINEZ SUAREZ
GRADE ____________ SECTION_____________ DATE: ______________
OBJECTIVE: To observe the oral expression methodology used by the teacher in the class.
QUESTIONS FREQUENCY
ALWAYS SOMETIMES RARELY NOT
VISIBLE
1. How often does the teacher use oral expression methodology?
2. How often does the teacher speak in English in the class?
3. How often do the students speak in English in the class?
4. How often do the students interact in English among
themselves?
5. How often do the students make a conversation in English in
the class?
6. How often does the teacher ask to the students to speak in
English?
7. How often does the teacher make an oral evaluation?
8. How often does the teacher interact with the whole class in
English?
9. How often does the teacher interact individually with each
student?
10. How often does the teacher elaborate oral activities to assess
students learning?
The former checklist was used to register how the teacher performed his job in the tenth
grade high school English classes. The criteria items included in it are clear enough to
explain them in a more detailed way and with the purpose to verify the methodology used
in the classroom in order to have in concrete the registration of the English class and the
students’ oral expression development.
Some aspects to be taken into account in this checklist were: the English teacher oral
expression and its frequency use in the classroom and with the students, the students’
English oral expression and their own interaction, the frequency of the English teacher-
student interaction, oral evaluations.
INTERVIEW
OBJECTIVE: To know the teacher’s knowledge and methodology experience.
1. Do you apply the English study program in the didactic planning?
________________________________________________________________
2. What method(s) do you use in the class?
3. Which book do you use in the classes? Why?
4. How do you consider your English level?
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
5. Mention one or two techniques that help to the students the develop of the oral
Expression in English.
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
6. Do you speak English with your students? Why?
________________________________________________________________
The checklist above was designed in order to know about the teacher’s experience and the
way how he applies the English class and the students’ oral expression it was designed to
know the English teacher level of English and the methodology applied.
CUESTIONARIO PARA LOS ALUMNOS DE EDUCACION MEDIA DE EL INSTITUTO NACIONAL DOCTOR
FRANCISCO MARTINEZ SUAREZ.
GRADO_______________________ SECCION_________________
OBJETIVO: Conocer y proyectar algunas ideas en alumnos de educación media sobre la
materia de ingles y su utilidad e importancia en su estudio académico y vida futura.
1-¿Te gusta la materia de inglés?
Mucho______ poco_______ nada_______
2-¿Estas realmente interesado/a en el idioma inglés?
Mucho____ poco____ nada_____
3- ¿Consideras que aprender inglés te servirá en tu vida?
Mucho _______ poco ______ nada______
4-¿Hablas inglés con tus compañeros y maestro en la clase?
Mucho ____ poco____ nada_____
5- ¿Consideras que aprender inglés es difícil?
Mucho___ poco ____ nada_____
6- ¿Consideras que tienes una buena base de conocimientos del idioma inglés?
Mucho____ poco____ nada______
7- ¿En tu medio existen oportunidades en donde puedas practicar tu idioma inglés?
Mucho _____ poco _______ nada_______
8- ¿Utilizas el idioma inglés en tu vida particular?
Mucho ____ poco ____ nada _____
9- ¿La metodología del maestro te ayuda a desarrollar tu expresión oral en inglés?
Mucho _____ poco _____ nada _____
10- ¿Crees que debe el maestro de cambiar su metodología?
Mucho_____ poco_____ nada ______
This questionnaire should be answered by the students of tenth grade section ”A” at Instituto
Nacional Doctor Francisco Martinez Juarez with the purpose to know the academic interest in the
foreign language.
In order to know the students’ interest because this is an important factor to develop the Oral
Expression based in the English Teaching process. The former is because intrinsic and extrinsic
motivations are essential for the development of everything related to human beings.
In addition to the stated above the researchers used the information gathered in this questionnaire to
make sure how meaningful the English class is to the students in the tenth grade of Bachillerato
General at Instituto Nacional Doctor Francisco Martinez Suarez section “A”
CONTRASTING THEORY AND PRACTICE
During the research Project development in the English classes at Instituto Nacional Dr.
Francisco Martinez Suarez, the group observed in the classes that the English teacher in
charge used many times techniques derived from the Grammar Translation Method
(GTM) such as: Translation of literary passages see annex(5), reading comprehension
questions, fill in the blanks. And the Silent Way Method (SWM), teacher’s silence, Peer
correction. In this case the students read and wrote reinforcing one another, see annex (6) it
is that these methods provided very good techniques for written or comprehension abilities
in the target language, but they make a little effort to develop the foreign language students’
oral expression in contrast to the research topic wherein the goal is the study of the
methodology to develop the oral expression. The English teacher could use other methods
focused to develop the oral expression such as: Audio Lingual Method, Direct Method,
Communicative Approach. But they weren’t seen during the classes observed. The research
group registered all the aspects in the checklists designed to capture the information
according to the level contrasting the teaching-learning process reality and the aims of the
research and the topic.
2.3 THEORETICAL-METHODOLOGICAL
FORMULATION OF THE RESEARCH
Considering Jean Piaget and other authors’ contribution done to the study of the
methodology and the information about the methods and principles used in the teaching-
learning process, oriented to study the English teaching methodology applied by the
teacher in the tenth grade section “A”, at Instituto Nacional Dr. Francisco Martinez
Suarez, the research project was registered and analyzed through checklists and direct
observation. Besides the bibliographic basis used for a better and a more understandable
research; also some limitations observed were the weak English used to develop the
students’ lack of interest language develop the oral expression of the English language.
During the research project it was found useful information in Diane Larsen Freeman in her
book Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching and H. Douglas Brown in his book
principles of learning and teaching, during the field work we observed that most of the time
the teacher used the Grammar Translation Method (GTM). This method helps to the
students to read and appreciate the foreign literature and know the grammar of the language
to improve the writing skill. In the Silent Way Method (SWM) the students are seen to be
much actively responsible for their own learning engaged in formulating hypothesis in
order to discover the rules of the target language. Both methods are very useful to develop
other abilities but not much the oral expression, in this case the methodology used wasn’t
the appropriate to develop the oral expression in the students according to what the
researchers think based on the theory related to the topic they have found.
Diane Larsen Freeman states in her book principles in Language Teaching “Students are
taught to translate from one language to another”26 the following characteristics about the
grammar translation method are:
-an important goal is for students to be able to translate from one language into another
They are consider successful language learners”27
-“Students memorize present tense and past participle form of one set of irregular verbs”
- “The ability to communicate is not a goal of foreign language instruction”28
-Students memorize vocabulary.
Our point of view is that Diane Larsen Freeman in her book states that the Grammar
Translation Method is used in the teaching of the English language and the main purpose of
this method is “students are taught to translate from one language to another” this method is
not appropriate to develop the oral expression.
According to H. Douglas Brown in his book Principles of Language Learning and
Teaching. The Grammar Translation Method is focused on grammatical rules as the basis
for translating from the second to the native language.
The major characteristics of grammar translation method are:
-Classes are taught in the mother tongue with little active use of the target language.
-Little or no attention is given to pronunciation.
-“Reading of difficult classical texts is begun early.”29
26 Idem.page.15.
27 Idem.page.15
28 Idem.page.17
29 Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, H. Douglas Brown, Longman Editors (2000), San Francisco
state University. Pages.15-16.
The researchers’ opinion is that the Grammar Translation Method H. Douglas Brown is
focused on grammatical rules memorization of vocabulary in various declensions this
classical method was adopted as the chief means for teaching foreign language.
According to Diane Larsen Freeman in her book techniques and principles in language
teaching in the silent way learners are seen to be much more actively responsible for their
own learning, engage in formulation hypotheses in order to discover the rules of the target
language.
This method presents the following principles:
-Language is not learned by repeating after a model, students need to develop their own
“inner criteria” for correctness to trust and to be responsible for their own production in the
target language.30
-“Students should learn to rely on each other and themselves”
-Learning involves transferring what one knows to new contexts.
The researchers opinion Diane Larsen Freeman states that the Silent Way Method is a
good method to learn about the errors and this is a sign to a more active attitude in the
Students practice with sentences, in short there exist a little development to the oral
expression in English but isn’t enough, Silent Way Method is focused to the four macro
abilities which are: Speaking, Writing, Listening and Reading.
Such as: sound color, teacher’s silence, peer correction, rods, self correction gestures, word
chart, but they aren’t focus to develop the oral expression.
30 Idem.pags. 15-16
H. Douglas Brown in his book principles of language learning and teaching states that the
silent way rested on more cognitive than affective arguments for its theoretical sustance,
Caleb Gattegno was interested in a “humanistic approach”.
This method has the following principles:
-Learning is facilitated if the learner discovers or creates rather than remembers and repeats
what is to be learned.
-Learning is facilitated by accompanying (mediating) physical objects.
-Learning is facilitated by problem solving involving the material to be learned.
This method capitalized on discovery-learning procedures Gattegno believed that learners
should develop indepence, autonomy and responsibility.
The researchers’ opinion is that H. Douglas Brown in his book Principles of Language
Learning and Teaching. He focused the Silent Way in a discovery-learning approach or
students with self interest in learning by themselves this approach creates independence,
autonomy and responsibility. The teacher keeps silence and let the students work and
discover new things or understand this method and its techniques are not one of the most
appropriate to develop the oral expression there exist other methods and techniques to
improve this ability.
2.4 DEVELOPMENT AND THEORETICAL DEFINITION
Methodology about our field observation has many different meanings according to books,
dictionaries and authors. The methodology used by the English teacher at Instituto Nacional
Dr. Francisco Martinez Suarez wasn’t the appropriate according to the researchers of this
work because in most of the techniques used by the teacher in this research he did not use
oral expression techniques according to the results of the observations done by the
researchers.
According to the results of the observations done by the researchers the teacher used the
Grammar Translation Method, there were less chances to put into practice listening and
speaking skills in the English classes, the main skills developed were writing and reading,
the emphasis of this method is the memorization of long list of vocabulary in both
languages, the foreign and native ones. The students’ goal is to be able to translate from one
language into another as well as read literature written in the language studied, this method
didn’t develop the oral expression in the tenth grade section “A” in the morning shift at
Instituto Nacional Dr. Francisco Martinez Suarez.
The teacher asked to the students to use their mother tongue; a lot of vocabulary was
taught, students elaborated lists of words and translated from English into Spanish. The
researchers’ opinion is that this method was not developing the oral expression because was
used the Grammar Translation Method the techniques used were developed mechanically
wherein the oral expression was not developed. The Grammar Translation Method was
created to help students read and appreciate a foreign language literature, but not to develop
the students’ oral expression.
Then the teacher began to practice the target language with the reading of texts with no
ordinary vocabulary, the exercise used by the teacher was the translation texts into Spanish.
The techniques arose the students’ interest to know the meanings of words, phrases,
paragraph in Spanish; this method didn’t develop the English oral expression as a part of
the methodology applied in the English classes frequency.
The other method used in the classes was the Silent Way from this method the teacher by
using some techniques and the teacher didn’t practice the oral expression techniques either.
When the English teacher used the Silent Way Method during the classes the students were
guided to a constant process where they were responsible for their own learning with the
purpose to lead students toward their auto learning.
While the practice of this method the teacher kept silence. He supported his classes used
color pictures, draws and the students repeated by themselves.
The oral expression is the basic problem in a foreign language teaching. Our point is that
the goal here would be to prepare learners to be able to use the language. It is obvious that
speaking in a foreign language is the most difficult thing to express in a good way, that
means to be able to know about some grammar rules and vocabulary fluency.
Through the research project, the researchers did not visualize the teacher using techniques
to develop the oral expression in the class of tenth grade section “A” at Insituto Nacional
Dr. Francisco Martinez Suarez in the morning shift due to the methodology applied in
classes students almost never the practiced the oral expression.
In short, the researchers think that the oral expression is developed through a constant
practice between the teacher and the students.
“Due to the theory found in the book Language Teaching: A scheme for Teacher
Education Oxford University Press wherein we found that the oral practice is necessary to
develop the expressivity in students; refers to the relation between the speaker and listener
in the process of speech refers to the term reciprocity enables us to distinguish between
those situations in which both the speaker and hearer are allowed to speak, and those where
conventionally, only the speaker has speaking rights, as during the speech. The reciprocal
dimension affects speech because there is more than one participant. The business of
making sure that the conversation works is shared by both participants.”31
31 Language Teaching: A Scheme for teacher Education. Editors CN Candlin and HG Widowson. Oxford
University Press.1987.page.8.
III Operational Framework
3.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECTS OF THE RESEARCH
Some of the data collected during the development of the field survey done at Instituto
Nacional Doctor Francisco Martinez Suarez is shown to describe the subject
of the research.
The center of this research was the methodology applied in order to know the English Oral
Expression in the students of tenth grade section “A” in the institution mentioned above.
In this the research project we stated that the Salvadoran students do not speak English with
the expected fluency and under this problem this research was done guided by its
objectives.
In this way after the field observation where the researchers were among the students they
observed the English Teaching Methodology applied by the teacher in class. The research
was developed at Instituto Nacional Doctor Francisco Martinez Suarez, Section “A” with a
population of 25 students, Educative District 04-01, Infraestructure code 10806, final calle
Morazan Bº el Calvario located in the Departamento de Chalatenango at north of the
Capital city.
The students of tenth grade ages were between 17 and 20 years old during the field
observation the teacher used methodology that did not help the students to develop the Oral
Expression.
The teacher didn’t use the appropriate methodologies to develop the Oral Expression
because he used the Grammar Translation Method (focused in the analysis of the texts and
a good translation and the Silent Way Method (focused in the awareness of the student
when it produces the work after a teacher guide.
Both methods do not have the appropriate techniques to develop the Oral Expression,
therefore during the classes observed students didn’t use the Oral Expression. Students
followed the teacher’s directions and practiced drills even though not all the students
showed a real interest in English to get a meaningful learning. They repeated vocabulary
and English sentences were translated into Spanish, students also completed paragraphs or
sentences.
The observation carried out in this institution was the practice of the bibliographical
research about the teaching methodology used by the teacher and its relation with the Oral
Expression, the final results let the researchers determine that the methodology applied by
the English Teacher most of the time was a mixture of elements of methods not focused to
develop the English Oral Expression.
The direct observation of the teacher and students’ role in the practice did not reflect any
remarkable application of the appropriate method to develop the English Oral Expression in
students of tenth grade section “A” Instituto Nacional Doctor Francisco Martinez Suarez.
The interview with the teacher, who is specialist in the English Teaching field, in charge of
Teaching English Language gave the following findings: he used the high school study
program in the planning but he didn’t use the most suitable method to develop the English
Oral Expression.
The researchers also wanted to realize about the student’s feelings and their preferences,
usefulness and class methodology of the English subject through a questionnaire. The
students answered that, they liked the English subject a little, but at the same time they
considered that, English is important for their lives. They also considered that learning
English is a little difficult, moreover they answered that they liked the way the teacher
developed the English class a little and the teacher must change his methodology to
teaching English.
These answers imply the students are aware about the importance of English learning, but
at the same time they recognize that there is a barrier that restraints them to success in their
learning which could be the teacher’s responses which reflect the essential would be the
fact to be completely aware of the new and appropriate methodology and how to use it.
But the teacher can not be the only responsible for this situation. The national education
system that has to provide all the conditions in schools and the teacher’s professionalism in
order to attain a truthful development of the appropriate methodology and its relation with
the Oral Expression to achieve one of the objectives of the English syllabus for tenth grade
of Bachillerato to which is to “develop communicative skills at a basic level”.33
Many times the Salvadoran teachers at public schools like “Instituto Nacional Doctor
Francisco Martinez Suarez” must face large groups, lack of essential resources to teach the
English subject, besides they have to teach in double shift which constitute additional
obstacle to develop the appropriate methodology in order to develop the English Oral
Expression in their students.
This research about the study of the methodology and its relation with the Oral Expression,
has shown how fragile appears the theory in practice, and the real situation in the educative
institutions.
33
MINED programa de ingles de primer año de Bachillerato de educación media, Pág. xi 1998.
3.2 DATA GATHERING PROCEDURE
For the data gathering were used three checklists and one research instrument. One of the
checklists was for the observation of the teacher’s role during the classes, other for
students’ interview and another for to know the English lesson plan.
The checklist for the observation of the teacher’s role was used to register how the teacher
performed his job in the tenth grade, the procedure consisted in the observation of the
teacher and students during their performance in the classroom, three times a week during
six weeks because of the English class schedule the total of the observations were 18 times
and the group spent 90 hours only in the observation. The researchers entered to the
classroom at the beginning of the class and they stayed there until the end, all the former
was verified to analyze the performance of the students and the teacher, after each class
during the break time, it was in this way, because the fill in of the checklist process in the
classroom could be disturbing for the teacher, students and researchers.
To register the data collected about the techniques used by the teacher to do his job,
student’s performance, etc. it was used a method of direct observation which demanded to
consider criteria, checking, observation and the creation of instruments to register data.
The post analysis and representation of conclusions based on the results gotten was the last
part to be done.
One of the most important parts that guided the direction of the research was the
bibliographical investigation done to understand how methodologies can be understood as
well as how the data gathered can be processed to get meaningful information, to be
presented in graphics and comments.
The process of calculating the data for the rest of the tables that appear in the rest of the
reports was calculated in the same way (for each cell of the tables there was a calculus in
percentage using the following formula:
Sample mean:
X= ___x____ , with the result multiplied by 100, where:
N
N= Represents the total for each column or total of the observation registered for a
category, criterion of phenomenon, and x= represents the quantity about which we want
to figure out the percentage)
A more detailed example is explained below:
The data registered deals with tenth grade and each of the diagrams comprises how often
the teacher did an activity in the classroom, for instance, if the teacher did something
dealing with any aspect specified in a copy of the checklist it was registered under the
frequency already presented (always, sometimes, rarely, not visible)
Data collected from the checklist designed to register activities in the tenth grade
CHECK LIST TO OBSERVE THE TEACHING METHODOLOGY USED IN THE
ORAL EXPRESSION IN THE CLASSROOM.
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DOCTOR FRANCISCO MARTINEZ SUAREZ
GRADE ____________ SECTION_____________ DATE: ______________
OBJECTIVE: To observe the oral expression methodology used in class by the teacher.
QUESTIONS FREQUENCY
CATEGORY Always % Sometimes % Rarely % Not
visible %
1. How often does the teacher use oral
expression methodology?
0
0.0
12
66.7
5
27.8
1
5.5
CHART 1
To get the percentage of 0.0 %, (which stands for the total of the times that criterion 1 (how
often does the teacher use Oral Expression methodology?) was registered in the cell
corresponding to the category “always”, and for the total of the column of always were
done 18 observations. Thus:
X= ∑ X
N = (0/18)* 100= 0.0%
For the table designed to figure out the percentages of the answers gotten from the survey
questionnaire given to students, the process was very similar. The only difference here was
that the totals used were not the totals of columns but the total of students who answered
positively for the question in turn.
Data collected from the checklist designed to register activities in the tenth grade,
percentages and its analysis.
CHECK LIST TO OBSERVE THE TEACHING METHODOLOGY USED IN THE ORAL EXPRESSION IN THE
CLASSROOM.
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DOCTOR FRANCISCO MARTINEZ SUAREZ
GRADE: tenth grade SECTION: “A”
OBJECTIVE: To observe the oral expression methodology used by the teacher in the class.
QUESTIONS FREQUENCY
ALWAYS % SOME
TIMES
% RARELY % NOT
VISIBLE
%
1. How often does the teacher use oral expression
methodology? 0 0.0% 12 66.7% 5 27.8 1 5.5%
2. How often does the teacher speak in English in the
class?
0 0.0% 8 44.4% 9 50.0% 1 5.6%
3. How often do the students speak in English in the
class? 1 5.6% 3 16.7% 9 50.0% 5 27.7%
4. How often do the students interact in English
among themselves? 1 5.6% 3 16.7% 9 50.0% 5 27.7%
5. How often do the students make a conversation in
English in the class? 0 0.0% 5 27.7% 7 39% 6 33.3%
6. How often does the teacher ask to the students to
speak in English? 1 5.6% 3 16.6% 11 61.1 3 16.6
7. How often does the teacher make an oral
evaluation? 1 5.6% 5 27.7% 6 33.3% 6 33.3%
8. How often does the teacher interact with the whole
class in English? 0 0.0% 5 27.7% 8 44.4% 5 27.7%
9. How often does the teacher interact individually
with each student? 0 0.0% 3 16.6% 8 44.4% 7 38.9%
10. How often does the teacher elaborate oral
activities to assess students learning? 0 0.0% 4 22.2% 8 44.4% 6 33.3%
1- How often does the teacher use the oral expression methodology?
The result obtained of “always” frequency was 0.0% which means that the teacher did
not use Oral Expression Methodology.
According to the “sometimes” frequency the result obtained was 66.7% which means
that the teacher sometimes used the Oral Expression methodology.
The result obtained for “rarely” frequency was 27.8% which means that the teacher
rarely used Oral Expression methodology.
According to “not visible” frequency the result obtained was 5.5% which means that the
teacher not visible used the Oral Expression methodology.
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
Al ways Sometimes Rarely Not visible
2- How often does the teacher speak in English in the class?
The result obtained of “always” frequency was 0.0% which means that the teacher did
not speak in English in the class.
According to the “sometimes” frequency the result obtained was 44.4%, which means
that the teacher sometimes speaks English in the class.
The result obtained for “rarely” frequency was 50.0% which means that the teacher
rarely speaks in English in the class.
According to “not visible” frequency the result obtained was 5.6% which means that it
was not visible the teacher speaks in English in the class.
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
Al ways Sometimes Rarely Not visible
3- How often do the students speak English in the class?
The result obtained of “always” frequency was 5.6 % which means that the students did
not speak in English in the class.
According to the “sometimes” frequency the result obtained was 16.7 %, which means
that the students sometimes speak English in the class.
The result obtained for “rarely” frequency was 50.0 %. This means that the students
rarely speak in English in the class.
According to “not visible” frequency the result obtained was 27.7 % which means that
it was not visible that the student speaks in English in the class.
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
always sometimes rarely not visible
4- How often do the students interact in English among themselves?
.
The result obtained of “always” frequency was 5.6 % which means that the students did
not interact among themselves.
According to the “sometimes” frequency the result obtained was 16.7 %. This is to say
that the students did not interact in English among themselves.
The result obtained for “rarely” frequency was 50.0 % meaning that the students did not
interact in English among themselves.
According to “not visible” frequency the result obtained was 27.7 % which means that
it was not visible that the students interact in English among themselves.
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
Al ways Sometimes Rarely Not visible
5- How often do the students make a conversation in English in the class?
.
The result obtained of “always” frequency was 0.0 % meaning that the students did not
make a conversation in English in the class.
According to the “sometimes” frequency the result obtained was 27.7 %. Thus students
did not make a conversation in English in the class.
The result obtained for “rarely” frequency was 39.9 % reveals that the students did not
make a conversation in English in the class.
According to “not visible” frequency the result obtained was 33.3 %. It means it was
not visible the students made a conversation in English in the class.
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
Al ways Sometimes Rarely Not visible
6- How often does the teacher ask to the students to speak in English?
.
The result obtained of “always” frequency was 5.6 % which means that the teacher
asked the students to speak in English.
According to the “sometimes” frequency the result obtained was 16.6 %, which means
that the teacher asked to the students to speak in English.
The result obtained for “rarely” frequency was 61.1 % which means that the teacher
asked to the students to speak in English.
According to “not visible” frequency the result obtained was 16.6 %. This is that the
teacher asked the students to speak in English.
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
Al ways Sometimes Rarely Not visible
7- How often does the teacher make an oral evaluation?
The result obtained of “always” frequency was 5.6 % which means that the teacher did
not make oral evaluation.
According to the “sometimes” frequency the result obtained was 27.7 %. This is to say
that the teacher makes oral evaluation.
The result obtained for “rarely” frequency was 33.3 % which means that the teacher
makes oral evaluation.
According to “not visible” frequency the result obtained was 33.3 % which means that
the teacher makes an oral evaluation.
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
Al ways Sometimes Rarely Not visible
8- How often does the teacher interact with the whole class in English?
The result obtained of “always” frequency was 0.0 % which means that the teacher did
not interact in English with the whole class.
According to the “sometimes” frequency the result obtained was 27.7 %, which means
that the teachers interact in English with the whole class.
The result obtained for “rarely” frequency was 44.4 %. This means that the teacher
interacts in English with the whole class.
According to “not visible” frequency the result obtained was 27.7 %. which means that
the teacher interacts in English with the whole class.
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
Al ways Sometimes Rarely Not visible
9- How often does the teacher interact individually with each student?
The result obtained of “always” frequency was 0.0 % which means that the teacher did
not interact in English individually.
According to the “sometimes” frequency the result obtained was 16.6%, which means
that the teacher interacts in English individually.
The result obtained for “rarely” frequency was 44.4 %. This is to say that the teacher
interacts in English individually.
According to “not visible” frequency the result obtained was 38.9 % which means that
the teachers interact in English individually.
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
Al ways Sometimes Rarely Not visible
10- How often does the teacher elaborate oral activities to asses students learning?
.
The result obtained of “always” frequency was 0.0 % which means that the teacher did
not elaborate oral evaluation to asses the students learning.
According to the “sometimes” frequency the result obtained was 22.2%, which means
that the teacher elaborates oral activities to asses the students learning.
The result obtained for “rarely” frequency was 44.4 %. It means that the teacher did not
elaborate oral activities to asses students learning.
According to “not visible” frequency the result obtained was 38.9 % which means that
the teachers interact in English individually.
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
Al ways Sometimes Rarely Not visible
CUESTIONARIO PARA LOS ALUMNOS DE EDUCACION MEDIA DE EL INSTITUTO NACIONAL DOCTOR
FRANCISCO MARTINEZ SUAREZ.
GRADO: primer año de bachillerato general SECCION: “A”
OBJETIVO: Conocer y proyectar algunas ideas en alumnos de educación media sobre la materia de
ingles y su utilidad e importancia en su estudio académico y vida futura.
QUESTIONS mucho % poco % nada %
1. Do you like the English subject? 8 32% 10 40% 7 28%
2. Are you interested in the English language?
9 36% 11 44% 5 20%
3. Do you consider that to Learn English will help you in your
life?
6 24% 13 52% 6 24%
4. Do you really work hard to speak English very well? 4 16% 13 52% 8 32%
5. Do you find difficult to learn English? 15 60% 6 24% 4 16%
6. Do you believe you have a good English Language
knowledge base?
3 12% 11 44% 11 44%
7. How do you manage the English Language expression? 2 8% 16 64% 7 28%
8. Do you practice the English Language in your particular
life?
5 20% 8 32% 12 48%
9. Does the teacher methodology help you to develop your
English oral expression?
0 0.0% 14 56% 11 44%
10. Do you think that the teacher should change his teaching
methodology?
17 68% 8 32% 0 0.0%
1- Do you like the English Subject?
In question #1 eight students answered “mucho” (32% of the total of answers for this
question)
Then students answered “poco” (40% of the total of answers for this question) and
Seven students answered “nada” (28% of the total of answers for this question).
This means that the 40% of whole population answered they liked English a little, and
the 28% didn’t like English at all.
0,0%
5,0%
10,0%
15,0%
20,0%
25,0%
30,0%
35,0%
40,0%
Mucho Poco Nada
2- Are you interested in the English Language?
In this question, nine students answered “mucho” (36% of the total of answers for this
question)
Eleven students answered “poco” (44% of the total of answers for this question)
and five students answered “nada” (20% of the total of answers for these questions).
According to the former only the 36% of all the students found interesting the English
Language.
0,0%
5,0%
10,0%
15,0%
20,0%
25,0%
30,0%
35,0%
40,0%
45,0%
mucho poco nada
3- Do you consider that to learn English will help you in your life?
In this question six students answered “mucho” (24% of the total of answers for this
question), thirteen students answered “poco” (52% of the total of answers for this question)
and six students answered “nada” (24% of the total of answers for this question).
The interesting results for this question was the 52% of the students answered they
considered English will help them in their lives a little, and the 24% considered English
will not help them at all in their lives.
4- Do you really work hard to speak English very well?
0,0%
10,0%
20,0%
30,0%
40,0%
50,0%
60,0%
mucho poco nada
In this question four students answered “mucho” (16% of the total of answers for this
questions) thirteen students answered “poco” (52% of the total of the answers for this
question) and eight students answered “nada” (32% of the total of answers for this
questions).
For this question more than fifty percent of the population said the work really hard to
speak English very well.
0,0%
10,0%
20,0%
30,0%
40,0%
50,0%
60,0%
mucho poco nada
5- Do you find difficult to learn English?
In this question fifteen students answered “mucho” (60% of the total of answers for this
question) six students answered “poco” (24 % of the total of answers for this question) and
four students answered “nada” (16% of the total of answers for this question).
The data reveals that more than 50% consider to learn English is difficult.
0,0%
10,0%
20,0%
30,0%
40,0%
50,0%
60,0%
mucho poco nada
6- Do you believe you have a good English Language knowledge base?
In this question three students answered “mucho” (12% of the total of answers for this
question) eleven students answered “poco” (44% of the total of answers for this
question) and eleven students answered “nada” (44% of the total of the answers for this
question).
The former shows that most of the students, 44% believe they have a good English
Language Knowledge Base.
0,0%
5,0%
10,0%
15,0%
20,0%
25,0%
30,0%
35,0%
40,0%
45,0%
mucho poco nada
7- How do you manage the English Language expression?
In this question two students answered “mucho” (8% of the total of answers for this
question), sixteen students answered “poco” (64% of the total of answers for this
questions), and seven students answered “nada” (28% of the total of answers for this
question).
The students believe they manage the English Language Expression.
0,0%
10,0%
20,0%
30,0%
40,0%
50,0%
60,0%
70,0%
mucho poco nada
8- Do you practice the English Language in your particular life?
In this question five students answered “mucho” (20% of the total of answers for this
question), eight students answered “poco” (32% of the total of answers for this
question) and twelve students answered “nada” 48 % of the total of the answers for this
question).
Almost half of the population 48%, said they practice the English Language in their
particular life which contradicts what was seen in class.
0,0%5,0%10,0%15,0%20,0%25,0%30,0%35,0%40,0%45,0%50,0%
mucho poco nada
9- Does the teacher methodology help you to develop your English Oral Expression?
.
In this question nobody answered “mucho” (0.0 % of the total of answers for this
question), fourteen students answered “poco” (56% of the total of answers for this
question), and eleven students answered “nada” (44% of the total of the answers for this
question).
The 56% of the students support the teacher’s methodology because they believe it
helps them to develop their English Oral Expression.
0,0%
10,0%
20,0%
30,0%
40,0%
50,0%
60,0%
mucho poco nada
10- Do you think that the teacher should change his teaching methodology?
In this question seventeen students answered “mucho” (68% of the total of answers for
this question), eight students answered “poco” (32% of the total of answers for this
question), and nobody answered “nada” (0.0% of the total of answers for this question).
The 68% of the whole population answered the teacher should change the teaching
methodology.
0,0%
10,0%
20,0%
30,0%
40,0%
50,0%
60,0%
mucho poco nada
3.3 SPECIFICATION OF THE TECHNIQUE FOR THE DATA ANALYSIS
The analysis of the data in the research study of the methodology applied in the English
Teaching process and its relation with the development of the Oral Expression, section “A”
tenth grade of Bachillerato General, Instituto Nacional Doctor Francisco Martinez Suarez
was carried out taking into account the frequency counting for each class the researchers
were in the school for the English classes to be observed. It was decided to make a
consolidation of the observations done in the classroom to do the analysis.
The observations done in the classes were converted into percentages to obtain final results
in such a way the observations determined all the research because they were all the
components of the research project.
Also the interview technique showed interesting results through these the researchers
gathered information about students’ preferences in relation to the English Class and
teaching methodology, this information was important to know other important aspects of
the research such as: Students’ feelings, attitudes, and behaviour.
3.4 Chronogram
20
07
2008
Aug
ust
Sep
tembe
r Octob
er Nov
embe
r Dec
embe
r janu
ary
Feb
ruary
March
April
May
Ju
ne
July
Activities
: Doc
umen
tal
Res
earch / F
ield Res
earch
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 C
on
cep
tual
Fra
mew
ork
1.1
Introd
uctio
n
1.2
Antec
eden
ts of the
problem
1.3
Mee
ting with
the ad
viso
r
1.4
Justifica
tion
1.5
Mee
ting with
the ad
viso
r
1.6
Statemen
t of the
Problem
1.7
Mee
ting with
the ad
viso
r
1.8
Goa
ls and
limita
tions
1.9
Con
cepts an
d ca
tego
ries
1.10
Mee
ting with
the ad
viso
r
1.11
Editio
n 1s
t draft
1.12
Prese
ntation 1s
t draft
1.13
Correction 1s
t draft
1.14
Mee
ting with
the ad
viso
r
Spe
cialty: Eng
lish Lan
guag
e
Aca
demic Adv
isor: L
icen
ciad
a Irma Carba
llo Herná
ndez
Top
ic: ” Study of th
e metho
dology
app
lied in th
e Eng
lish teac
hing
proce
ss and
its relatio
n with
the de
velopm
ent o
f the
oral e
xpression, sec
tion” A” grad
e of bac
hillerato gen
eral, Ins
tituto
Nac
iona
l Doc
tor Franc
isco
Martín
ez Suá
rez,Cha
latena
ngo,20
07”.
Stude
nts: M
arta Is
abel Torres Torres, M
elvin Rolan
do Rau
da M
árque
z, Celina Yane
th Cartage
na M
aldo
nado
.
Aug
ust
Sep
tembe
r Octob
er Nov
embe
r Dec
embe
r Ja
nuary
Feb
ruary
March
April
May
Ju
ne
July
Activities
:doc
umen
tal res
earch
/ field res
earch
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
2 T
heo
reti
cal
fram
ewo
rk
2.1
Doc
umen
tal res
earch: th
eoretical
metho
dologica
l bas
is
2.2
Mee
ting with
the ad
viso
r
2.3
Empiric
al fram
ework
2.4
Instrumen
t des
ign
2.5
Mee
ting with
the ad
viso
r
2.6
Field
attend
ance
:in
strumen
ts
application
2.7
Field atte
ndan
ce: o
bserva
tion
2.8
Mee
ting with
the ad
viso
r
2.9
Organ
ization of th
e inform
ation
2.10
Mee
ting with
the ad
viso
r
2.11
The
oretical
metho
dologica
l form
ulation of th
e rese
arch
2.12
Mee
ting with
the ad
viso
r
2.13
Dev
elop
men
t an
d theo
retical
defin
ition
2.14
Editio
n 2n
d draft
2.15
Prese
ntation 2n
d draft
2.16
2n
d draft c
orrection
2.17
Mee
ting with
the ad
viso
r
Aug
ust
Sep
tembe
r Octob
er Nov
embe
r Dec
embe
r Ja
nuary
Feb
ruary
March
April
May
Ju
ne
July
Activities
: do
cumen
tal
rese
arch
/ fie
ld res
earch
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
1 2
3 4
3 O
per
atio
nal
fra
mew
ork
3.1
Des
criptio
n of the
sub
jects of the
rese
arch
3.2
Mee
ting with
the ad
viso
r
3.3
Data ga
thering proc
edure
3.4
Mee
ting with
the ad
viso
r
3.5
Spe
cification
of the
tec
hnique
for the
data
analisys
3.6
Mee
ting with
the ad
viso
r
3.7
chrono
gram
3.8
Mee
ting with
the ad
viso
r
3.9
reso
urce
s
4.0
Prelim
inary table of con
tents on
fin
al rep
ort
4.1
Mee
ting with
the ad
viso
r
4.2
Use
d an
d ge
neral b
iblio
grap
hy
4.3
Mee
ting with
the ad
viso
r
4.4
Editio
n 3r
d draft
4.5
Prese
ntation 3r
d draft
3.5 RESOURCES
Human resources
Researchers, academic advisor, teacher, student’s school principal and school vice
principal.
Logistic resources
School, questionnaires and observation of the classes.
3.6 PRELIMINARY TABLE OF CONTENTS ON FINAL REPORT
I Conceptual framework.
In this chapter the objectives proposed are toward to identify the English Teaching
Methodology. In the justification stated that the students do not speak English with the
expected fluency as result of some factors related to the English Teaching Methodology,
students’ interest and others. The statement of the problem is based on the Teaching
Methodology. The goals are focused in some authors’ contributions and the limitations
found theories in disagreement, which causes problems at the moment of analyzing the
different methodologies used to develop the students’ oral expression. Also it is include the
concepts and categories used in the research.
II Theoretical framework.
In this chapter recompiled the documental theory of the author. Besides the empirical framework
construction wherein the field work was develop and the theories contraposition of the theoretical
Methodological basis.
III Operational Framework.
In this chapter is include the description of the subject of the research, data gathering procedure the
specification of the technique for the data analysis the chronogram of activities and resources.
Bibliography used to develop the research
Brown, H. Douglas, Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, (4a Ed.) Longman Editors (2000).
Bygate Martin, Language Teaching: A Scheme for teacher Education (1st
Ed.) Editors CN Candlin and HG
Widowson. Oxford University Press.1987.
Creando Formas Efectivas de enseñar y aprender, Editores Montañas de fuego, San Salvador 2002.
Larsen Freeman Diane, Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching (2nd
Ed.)
Oxford University Press, 2000.
Editorial Gedisa, El discurso como estructura y proceso., Barcelona España, 1997
Editorial Santillana, SA. Diccionario de las Ciencias de la Educación, Madrid España, 1983.
Mac Millan English Dictionary, First Publisher, 2002.
Manual de la Educación, Editorial Océano, Barcelona España 1997.
MINED, Programa de estudio de Inglés, Primero y Segundo año de Educación Media. 1998.
Ravera Carreño Margarita, varios. Didácticas de las Segundas Lenguas Estrategias y Recursos Básicos
.Editorial Santillana. Madrid 1990.
Vasquez, Veronica del Carmen, otros. Reaches and Limitations of the Constructivist Methodology
Proposed in the English Program of junior high. 2006.
WEB SITES
http://www.cal.org/resources/Digest/Rodgers.htm
http://www.jobaccess.gov.au/joac/advice/jobrequirementthree/oral_expression.htm
ATTACHAMENTS
Annex 1
CHECK LIST TO OBSERVE THE TEACHING METHODOLOGY USE IN THE ORAL EXPRESSION IN THE
CLASSROOM.
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DOCTOR FRANCISCO MARTINEZ SUAREZ
GRADE ____________ SECTION_____________ DATE: ______________
OBJECTIVE: To observe the oral expression methodology used by the teacher in the class.
QUESTIONS FREQUENCY
ALWAYS SOMETIMES RARELY NOT
VISIBLE
1. How often does the teacher use oral expression methodology?
2. How often does the teacher speak in English in the class?
3. How often do the students speak in English in the class?
4. How often do the students interact in English among
themselves?
5. How often do the students make a conversation in English in
the class?
6. How often does the teacher ask to the students to speak in
English?
7. How often does the teacher make an oral evaluation?
8. How often does the teacher interact with the whole class in
English?
9. How often does the teacher interact individually with each
student?
10. How often does the teacher elaborate oral activities to assess
students learning?
Annex 2
INTERVIEW
OBJECTIVE: To know the teacher’s knowledge and methodology experience.
1. Do you apply the English study program in the didactic planning?
________________________________________________________________
2. What method(s) do you use in the class?
3. Which book do you use in the classes? Why?
4. How do you consider your English level?
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
5. Mention one or two techniques that help to the students the develop of the oral
Expression in English.
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
6. Do you speak English with your students? Why?
________________________________________________________________
Annex 3
CUESTIONARIO PARA LOS ALUMNOS DE EDUCACION MEDIA DE EL INSTITUTO NACIONAL
DOCTOR FRANCISCO MARTINEZ SUAREZ.
GRADO_______________________ SECCION_________________
OBJETIVO: Conocer y proyectar algunas ideas en alumnos de educación media sobre
la materia de ingles y su utilidad e importancia en su estudio académico y vida futura.
1-¿Te gusta la materia de ingles?
Mucho______ poco_______ nada_______
2-¿Estas realmente interesado/a en el idioma ingles?
Mucho____ poco____ nada_____
3- ¿Consideras que aprender ingles te servirá en tu vida?
Mucho _______ poco ______ nada______
4-¿Estas trabajando realmente para poder hablar muy bien el ingles?
Mucho ____ poco____ nada_____
5-¿Consideras que aprender ingles es difícil?
Mucho___ poco ____ nada_____
6-¿Consideras que tienes una buena base de conocimientos del idioma ingles?
Mucho____ poco____ nada______
7-¿Como manejas la expresividad del idioma ingles?
Mucho _____ poco _______ nada_______
8-¿Utilizas mucho el idioma ingles en tu vida particular?
Mucho ____ poco ____ nada _____
9-¿La metodología del maestro te ayuda a desarrollar tu expresión oral en ingles?
Mucho _____ poco _____ nada _____
10-¿Crees que debe el maestro de cambiar su metodología?
Mucho_____ poco_____ nada ______
Annex 4
Read and write a summary about the following paragraph.
“El Salvador is the smallest country in Central America it is 260 kilometers long from
east to west, 100 kilometers north to south and its pacific coastline is 320 kilometers
long. It is possible to drive the length of the country in a day, although the roads may
dictate otherwise.
El Salvador’s rough geography is a direct result of its location along the Cinturon de
fuego (belt of fire), a ring of volcanos and fault zones in encircling the Pacific Ocean.
According to historical report America signed 1520, caused by the shifting of the
earth’s planes and volcanic eruption. There are 14 large volcanos in the country
although many are extinct. The largest are the Santa Ana (2365,m.), San Vicente (2,181
m.) and San Miguel (2,129 m.) volcanos. Periodic eruption had covered the country
with ashes, a situation which usually coincide with earthquakes.
About the 90 percent of El Salvador is blessed with incredibly fertile volcanic soil. El
Rio Lempa, the country’s largest river, was formed by volcanic eruption and has created
a 24 kilometers wide alluvial plain in southeast El Salvador. The landscape is dotted by
a few large lakes including the lago de Ilopango just east San Salvador. The dazzlingly
blue lago the Coatepeque lies next to Cerro Verde and the Izalco and Santa Ana
volcanoes west of San Salvador. Geysers are scattered throughout the country and
provide some of the country’s electricity”.
Annex 5
Fill in the blanks with the following words.
(books,father,joined,life,cuba,received,escaped,earthquake,execute,reputation,opened,
Jailed, escape, escaping, El Salvador, fell)
“Roque Dalton was a famous salvadorean. He was a revolutionary and a prolific writer
who joined the guerilla at the beginnings of the stages. Roque Dalton escaped death and
long-term imprisonment many times.
The son of a salvadorean mother and a U.S. father Dalton received international acclaim
for his writing. He wrote fifteen books in all, most while in the exile in Mexico, Cuba
and Czechoslovaquia. For much of Dalton’s life, many of his books were banned in El
Salvador.
While still in El Salvador, Dalton was jailed repeatedly and earned a reputation for
escaping under unusual circumstances. In 1960, the government of Coronel Jose Maria
Lemus fell in a couple of days before Dalton was to be executed. Later, an earthquake
rocked the capital opened a hole in Dalton’s cell large enough for him to escape
through”
Annex 6
Research Instrument
Unit Topic Methodology Technique used Time
spent
Observable
macro skill
students improve
Sharing
is
I did
it
GTM
SW
GTM
-Reading
comprehension
Questions
-Translate into
Spanish the English
paragraph
SW
-Peer correction
Correct the questions
by themselves.
15
Minutes
15
Minutes
15
minutes
-Reading
-Writing