Upload
phungnhan
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
STUDY ON PERFORMANCE OF FLAT AND ELONGATED AGGREGATE
N LOW TRAFFIC ROAD
NUR SYAZWANI B1NTI MD ZAKI
A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the award of the degree of
Bachelor of Civil Engineering
Faculty of Civil Engineering & Earth Resources
Universiti Malaysia Pahang
NOVEMBER 2010
ABSTRACT
Aggregate are the largest amount of material that can be found in HMA.
Aggregates make up between 80% to 90% of total volume or 94% to 95% of the
mass of hot mix asphalt (HMA). With this facts, it is totally agree that aggregate
properties are very important in HMA because it will affect the performances of
the HMA. The objectives of this research are to evaluate the performances of the
pavement using flat and elongated aggregate as the main material and to
compare the strength of using flat and elongated aggregate in pavement mixes
for low traffic road with the normal mixes. During the first stage, the aggregates
were tested in order to know the characteristic. The test that had been done were
AIV Test, ACV Test, LA Abrasion Test, Flakiness Index and Elongation Index.
The bitumen also had been tested with the Penetration Test and Softening Point
Test. After that, the mixtures were designed and prepared. The mixtures were
designed as ACW14 and were tested in accordance with the JKR
Specification:Arahan Teknik Jalan. 15 samples were prepared using Marshall
Mix Design methods in order to determine the optimum asphalt content (OAC).
The second stage of the research was to evaluate the performances of the
mixture consist of flat and elongated aggregates. 12 samples were prepared with
different percentage of flat and elongated aggregate which is 0% as the standard
mixture, 20%, 40% and 60% as the experimental mixture. Based on the results,
it is observed that flat and elongated aggregate might implies a significant effect
on the performance of the mixtures. Thus, it can be concluded that the flat and
elongated aggregate can be used in pavement mixtures but the percentage of
aggregate must be limited to certain level to make sure the strength
characteristics of the mixes can be maintained.
V
ABSTRAK
Batu baur merupakan bahan yang mempunyai jumlah terbesar di dalam
campuran tar panas. Batu baur mewakili antara 80% ke 90% daripada isipadu
atau 94% ke 95% daripada berat campuran tar panas. Dengan fakta mi, ianya
telah dipersetujui bahawa ciri-ciri bath baur adalah sangat penting di dalam
campuran tar panas kerana ia akan memberi kesan kepada prestasi campuran tar
panas. Objektif kajian mi dijalankan adalah untuk menilai prestasi jalan yang
mengandungi bath baur yang leper dan memanjang sebagai antara bahan utama
dan untuk membandingkan kekuatan jalan yang mengandungi bath baur yang
leper dan memanjang untuk jalan yang rendah aliran trafik dengan campuran
biasa. Path peringkat pertama, bath baur telah diuji untuk mengetahui ciri
cirinya. Antara ujian yang telah dijalankan ialah ujian MV, ACV, LA Abrasion,
indeks keleperan dan indeks pemanjangan. Bitumen juga turut diuji dengan i.jian
penetrasi dan ujian titik kelembutan. Selepas itu, campuran jalan di reka dan
disediakan. Campuran telah direka sebagai ACW14 dan telah diuji mengikut
spesifikasi JKR:Arahan Teknik Jalan. 15 sampel telah disediakan menggunakan
kaedah rekabentuk campuran Marshall untuk menthpatkan kandungan tar yang
optimum. Peringkat kedua dalan kajian mi adalah untuk menilai prestasi
campuran yang mengandungi bath baur yang leper dan memanjang. 12 sampel
telah disediakan dengan perathsan bath baur yang leper dan memanjang yang
berbeza iaitu 0% sebagai campuran piawai, 20%, 40% dan 60% sebagai
campuran kajian. Berdasarkan keputusan, didapati bahawa bath baur yang leper
dan memanjang telah memberikan kesan kepada prestasi campuran. Oleh itu,
konldusinya bath baur yang leper dan memanjang boleh digunakan di dalam
campuran jalan tetapi peratusan bath baur mestilah dihadkan kepada satu tahap
untuk memastikan ciri-ciri kekuatan campuran tersebut boleh dikekailcan.
VI
TABLE OF CONTENT
CHAPTER TITLE PAGE
TITLE i
DECLARATION
DEDICATION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iv
ABSTRACT v
ABSTRAK vi
TABLE OF CONTENT vii
LIST OF TABLES xii
LIST OF FIGURES xiii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS / SYMBOLS xvi
LIST OF APPENDIX xvii
WDUCTION 1
Introduction 1
Background 2
1.2.1 Flexible Pavement 3
1.2.2 Aggregate Shape and Surface Particles 5
Problem Statement 7
Objectives 8
Scope of Study 8
Significant of study 9
MI
J1Ti
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
VIII
2 LITERATURE REVIEW 10 2.1 Introduction 10 2.2 Hot Mix Asphalt 11
2.2.1 Physical Properties of Asphalt 11 2.3 Asphalt Cement 13 2.4 Aggregate 14
2.4.1 Classes of Aggregate 18 2.4.2 Aggregate Strength 19 2.4.3 Flat and Elongated Aggregate 20
2.5 Summary 21
3 METHODOLOGY 22 3.1 Introduction 22 3.2 Evaluation of Aggregate Physical Properties 24
3.2.1 Aggregate Impact Value Test 24 3.2.2 Aggregate Crushing Value Test 26 3.2.3 LA Abrasion Test 28 3.2.4 Flakiness Index 30 3.2.5 Elongation Index 31
3.3 Evaluation of Asphalt 32 3.3.1 Penetration Test 32 3.3.2 Softening Point Test 34
3.4 Marshall Mix Design 36 3.5 Analysis of Asphalt Mixture 38
3.5.1 Density and Void Analysis 38 3.5.2 Resilient Modulus Test 40
3.5.3 Marshall Stability and Flow Test 41 3.6 Summary 42
ix
4 RESULT AND DATA ANALYSIS 44 4.1 Introduction 44 4.2 Analysis on Aggregate Physical Properties 45
4.2.1 Aggregate Impact Value Test 45
4.2.1.1 AIV Test Result for Standard 45
Aggregate
4.2.1.2 AIV Test Result for Flat and 47
Elongated Aggregate
4.2.2 Aggregate Crushing Value Test 48
4.2.2.1 ACV Test Result for 48
Standard Aggregate
4.2.2.2 ACV Test Result for Flat 50
and Elongated Aggregate
4.2.3 LA Abrasion Test si
4.2.3.1 LA Abrasion Test Result 51
for Standard Aggregate
4.2.3.1 LA Abrasion Test Result for 52
Flat and Elongated Aggregate
4.2.4 Flakiness Index and Elongation Index 53
4.3 Bitumen Performance Result 54 4.3.1 Penetration Test 54
4.3.2 Softening Point Test 55
4.4 Determining Optimum Asphalt Content 55 4.4.1 Resilient Modulus 56
4.4.2 Bulk Density 57
4.4.3 Void jn Total Mix 58
4.4.4 Marshall Stability 59
4.5 Analysis of JIMA Characteristics using Flat 61
And Elongated Aggregate
4.5.1 Result of Resilient Modulus 61 4.5.2 Result of Bulk Density 62
4.5.3 Result of Marshall Stability 63
4.5.4 Result of Void in Total Mix 64 4.5.5 Result of Void in Mineral Aggregate 65 4.5.6 Result of Void Filled with Asphalt 66 4.5.7 Result of Flow 67 4.5.8 Result of Stiffness 68
4.6 Comparison Between Standard 69 Pavement Mixture and Experimental
Pavement Mixture
4.6.1 Resilient Modulus 69 4.6.2 Bulk Density 70 4.6.3 Void in Total Mix 71 4.6.4 Marshall Stability 72 4.6.5 Void in Mineral Aggregate 73
4.6.6 Void Filled with Asphalt 74 4.6.7 Flow 75 4.6.8 Stiffness 76
4.7 Summary 77
5 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION 78 5.1 Introduction 78 5.2 Discussion on result of pavement mixtures 79
consist of flat and elongated aggregate
5.2.1 Resilient Modulus 79 5.2.2 Bulk Density 80 5.2.3 Marshall Stability 80 5.2.4 Void in Total Mix 81 5.2.5 Void in Mineral Aggregate 82 5.2.6 Void Filled with Asphalt 82 5.2.7 Flow 83 5.2.8 Stiffness 83
5.3 Discussion on the Comparison Between 84 Standard Pavement Mixture and
X
Experimental Pavement Mixture
5.3.1 Resilient Modulus 85
5.3.2 Bulk Density 85
5.3.3 Void inTotal Mix 86 5.3.4 Marshall Stability 87 5.3.5 Void in Mineral Aggregate 87 5.3.6 Void Filled with Asphalt 88 5.3.7 Flow 89 5.3.8 Stiffness 89
5.4 Conclusion 90 5.5 Recommendation 91 5.6 Summary of Research 91
REFERENCES 92
Xi
APPENDIX
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE NO. TITLE PAGE
4.1 AW Test result for standard aggregate 45 4.2 MV Test result for flat and elongated aggregate 46 4.3 ACV Test result for standard aggregate 48 4.4 ACV Test result for flat and elongated aggregate 49 4.5 LA Abrasion Test result for standard aggregate 50 4.6 LA Abrasion Test result for flat and elongated 51
Aggregate
4.7 Flakiness and Elongation Index result 52 4.8 Penetration Test result 53
4.9 Softening Point Test result 54
4.10 PWD Standard Specification for Road Works 60
XII
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE NO. TITLE PAGE
1.1 Flexible pavement layer 4
2.1 Flat and elongated particles 20 3.1 Flow chart for laboratory work and analysis 23 3.2 Impact test machine 25 3.3 AIV sample 25
3.4 Compressing testing machine 27 3.5 ACV sample 27 3.6 LA Abrasion test machine 29 3.7 Flakiness sieve 30 3.8 Elongation index test 31 3.9 Flat ang elongated aggregate 31 310 Automatic penetrometer 33 3.11 Asphalt sample 33 3.12 Softening point test apparatus 35
3.13 Asphalt sample 35 3.14 Sample for determining optimum asphalt content 37 3.15 Marshall stability and flow test 42 4.1 Resilient modulus for standard mixture 50 4.2 Bulk density for standard mixture 51 4.3 Void in total mix for standard mixture 52
4.4 Marshall stability for standard mixture 53 4.5 Resilient modulus for experimental mixture 56 4.6 Bulk density for experimental mixture 57
4.7 Marshall stability for experimental mixture 58
XIII
xiv
4.8 Void in total mix for experimental mixture 59
4.9 Void in mineral aggregate for experimental 60
mixture
4.10 Void filled with asphalt for experimental mixture 61 4.11 Flow for experimental mixture 62 4.12 Stiffness for experimental mixture 63 4.13 Comparison of resilient modulus between 64
standard and experimental
4.14 Comparison of bulk density between standard 65
and experimental
4.15 Comparison of void in total mix between standard 66
and experimental
4.16 Comparison of marshall stability between standard 67
and experimental
4.17 Comparison of void in mineral aggregate between 68
standard and experimental
4.18 Comparison of void filled with asphalt between 69
standard and experimental
4.19 Comparison of flow between standard and 70
experimental
4.20 Comparison of stiffness between standard and 71
experimental
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS /SYMBOLS
AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transport Officials
ACV Aggregate Crushing Value
MV Aggregate Impact Value
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
BSI British Standard Institution
cm centimetre
d bulk density
g gram
9/cm3 gram per centimetre cube
G mb Bulk specific gravity
Gse effective specific gravity of the mix
Gb specific gravity of asphalt content
Gnm maximum theoretical specific gravity of the mix
bulk specific gravity of the aggregate
HMA hot mix asphalt
kg kilogram
kN kilo newton
kPa kilo pascal
kg/mm kilogram per milirnetre
LA Abrasion Los Angeles Abrasion
LVDT Linear Variable Differential Transducers
MATTA Material Testing Apparatus
MPa mega pascal
mm/min milimetre per minute
m metre
mm milimetre
rATJ
ms milisecond
N newton
PWD Public Work DepartmeniljKR
Pb asphalt content, percent by weight of the mix
rpm rotation per minute
TMD maximum theoretical density
VFA void filled with asphalt
VMA void in mineral aggregate
VTM void in total mix
WD mass of specimen in air
WSSD surface dry mass
WSUB mass of specimen in water
% percentage
°C degree Celcius
xvi
LIST OF APPENDIX
APPENDIX NO. TITLE
A Marshall Test Result for 5.0% and 5.5% of percentage bitumen
B Marshall Test Result for 6.0% and 6.5% of percentage bitumen
C Marshall Test Result for 7.0% of percentage bitumen
D Marshall Test Result for 0% and 20% of flat and
elongated aggregate
E Marshall Test Result for 40% and 60% of flat and
elongated aggregate
F Resilient Modulus Test Result for 0% of flat and
elongated aggregate
G Resilient Modulus Test Result for 20% of flat and
elongated aggregate
H Resilient Modulus Test Result for 40% of flat and
elongated aggregate
I Resilient Modulus Test Result for 60% of flat and
elongated aggregate
xvii
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
Highway plays an important role in the development and sustainability of
human civilization from ancient times to the present. Today, throughout the world,
highways dominate the transportation system and providing access of natural
resources, retail marketing, industrial production, human population and to connect
between two towns (Mannering et a!, 2009). Highway transportation also gives a
big influence on the economic, social and political. In the twenty-first century, the
role of highway continues to evolve and investments in highway infrastructure have
been made continuously. But, highways require maintenance and rehabilitation at
regular interval. Thus, there is a strong emphasis in developing a new ways to
more economically construct and extend the life of the new facilities and to
effectively combat an aging highway infrastructure (Mannering et a!, 2009).
Pavements are among the costliest item associated with highway
construction and maintenance. In Malaysia, there are 74 603 km of road length
comprises in Semenanjung Malaysia, Sabah and Sarawak. Some of the road in
Malaysia are not paved but are composed of either gravel or a stabilized material
2
consisting of an aggregate material bound together with a cementing agent such as
Portland cement, lime fly ash, or asphaltic cement. Malaysia's road system
comprises several types of roads which are highway/expressways, federal roads,
state roads and municipal roads. The roads are either be design and maintenance by
major concessionaries, federal government, state government or municipal council.
Pavement provides two basic functions. The first function of pavement is to
guide the driver and delineate the roadway by giving a visual perspective of the
horizontal and vertical alignment of the traveled path. The second function of
pavement is to support vehicle loads. These function is the reason why pavement
design is very important (Mannering et al, 2009).
1.2 Background
In flexible pavement, mineral aggregate constitutes approximately about
95% of hot mix asphalt (HMA) by weight Q.S. Chen et al, 2005). Coarse aggregate
is the dominant material in the mineral aggregate. One of the main characteristics in
aggregate is the shape and sizes. Shape is important for proper compaction, load
resistance and workability. This is supported by the research that had been done by
Brown et al. 1989, Kandhal et al. 1992 and Kim et al. 1992 where the research has
shown that aggregate characteristics such as particle size, shape and texture
influence the performance and service ability of hot mix asphalt pavement.
Generally, cubic-angular shaped particles with a rough surface texture are the best.
1.2.1 Flexible Pavement
Flexible pavements are so named because the total pavement structure
deflects or flexes under loading. A flexible pavement structure is typically
composed of several layers of material which is surface course consist of wearing
course and binder course, base course, sub-base and sub-grade (Mannering et al,
2009). Each layer receives the loads from the above layer, spreads them out, then
passes on these loads to the next layer below. Thus, the further down in the
pavement structure. a particular layer is, the less load (in terms of force per area) it
must carry. Flexible pavement is laid with hot mix asphalt (HMA) at the surface
layer. The flexible pavement surface layers components are :-
• Seal coat : seal coat is a thin asphalt surface treatment used to
waterproof the surface or to provide skid resistance where the
aggregates in the surface course could be polished by traffic and
become slippery. Depending on the purpose, seal coats might or
might not be covered with aggregate.
• Surface course the surface course is the top course of an asphalt
pavement and sometimes called wearing course. It is usually
constructed of dense graded HMA. It must be tough to resist
distortion under traffic and provide a smooth and skid-resistant
riding surface. It also must be waterproof to protect the entire
pavement and subgrade form the weakening effect of water.
3
• Binder course the binder course or sometimes is called the asphalt
base course, is the asphalt layer below the surface course. Asphalt
4
will be too thick if only be laid in one layer. Thus, binder course is
used. Binder course generally consist of larger aggregates and less
asphalt and does not require as high quality as the surface course.
Resulted in a more economical design.
. Tack coat and prime coat : a tack coat is a very light application of
asphalt, usually asphalt emulsion diluted with water and used to
ensure a bond between the surface being paved and the overlying
course. A prime coat is an application of low-viscosity cutback
asphalt to an absorbent surface, such as an untreated granular base
on which an asphalt layer will be placed. its purpose is to bind the
granular base to the asphalt layer. The difference between a tack coat
and a prime coat is that a tack coat does not require the penetration
of asphalt into the underlying layer whereas a prime coat penetrates
into the underlying layer, plugs the voids and form a watertight
surface.
;eal Coat f Surface Course
Tack Coat .1 Binder Course -
Prime Coat' Base Course
• Subbase Course
l Compacted Subgrade
Natural Subgrade
Figure 1.1 Flexible pavement layer
1.2.2 Aggregate shape and surface particles
Aggregates are the largest component of 1-JIMA, making up 80 to 85 percent
of the mixture by volume and roughly 95 percent of the mixture by weight.
Aggregate characteristics and quality are major factors in the performance of HMA.
Aggregate is one of the most important materials in flexible pavement design
besides asphalts as these two materials will direct effect to the strength of the
highway segment (Mannering et al, 2009).
Mixtures with crushed coarse aggregate with sharp, angular shapes will
usually have the greatest shear resistance and, hence, the highest resistance to
rutting Q.S. Chen et al, 2005). These materials create HMA mixtures with the
highest voids in the mineral aggregate (VMA). Coarse aggregate angularity is
defined as the percentage by weight of the aggregate with one or more fractured
faces according to American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D5821.
Similar to coarse aggregate, crushed angular fine aggregate will usually have the
greatest shear resistance. The use of crushed angular fine aggregate typically
increases the mixture VMA. Fine .aggregate angularity is established by AASHTO
T304, Method A, which measures the percentage of air voids present in loosely
compacted aggregate that passes the 2.36 mm sieve
The percentage of flat and elongated particles in coarse aggregate is another
important aggregate parameter. Fiat and elongated aggregates are known to have
adverse effects on the performance and strength properties of bituminous paving
mixtures (Oduroh, P.K, 1999). Besides, it will also affect the workability which
may lead to low densification, fatigue cracking and decrease in the fatigue
resistance of the pavement. Flat and elongated aggregates are aggregates with the
thickness less than three-fifths of their dimension and length greater that one and
fourth fifth times their mean dimension. Flat and elongated particles of coarse
aggregates have a tendency to fracture more easily than other aggregate particles. It
6
can break during the construction process, changing the mixture gradation and the
overall mixture properties. Therefore, aggregate shape is one of the important
properties that must be considered in the mix design of asphalt pavements to avoid
premature pavement failure. The shape of the aggregates affects the particles
interlock which affects the rutting resistance of the HMA pavement (Mannering et
a!, 2009).
Soft aggregate has a greater tendency to break than hard aggregate (Oduroh,
P.K, 1999). Flat, slivered aggregate particles also have a tendency to lie flat in the
pavement, creating slippage planes and reducing aggregate interlock. The way in
which aggregate particles pack together for any given gradation is influenced by the
surface texture of the particles. Rougher texture generates more friction between
aggregate particles and the mixture therefore resists compaction. Hence, for a given
number of design gyrations, the mixture will not compact as much and the VMA
will be higher.
Smooth texture, by contrast, does not generate as much friction between
aggregate particles. For a given number of design gyrations, the mixture containing
smoother particles will compact more easily and the VMA will be lower. Typically,
crushed faces have more texture than uncrushed faces. In the case of gravel
aggregate, the uncrushed portion of the particles tends to have a smooth texture.
The greater the percentage of each individual particle surface area that is fractured,
the more surface texture that will be present. Usually, the more a gravel is crushed,
the more surface texture it will have. Particles with two crushed faces tend to have a
greater percentage of surface area with rough texture than will particles with only
one crushed face (Oduroh, P.K, 1999).
However, crushing will not always increase texture, because some
aggregates fracture with very smooth faces. For any given gradation, the density to
VA
which aggregate particles will pack is influenced by the shape of the particles.
Angular particles those with sharp, defined edge tend to produce mixtures with a
higher VMA than mixtures containing rounded particles. Cubical particles that
retain a sharp, angular edge tend to create a higher VMA than particles with
rounded edges. But in this case, the flat and elongated aggregate will be used as the
material in the mixture for a low traffic road.
1.3 Problem Statement
Pavements tend to distress after only a few years of construction.
Pavement's failure such as cracking, stripping, rutting and so on happens due to
traffic loading and some other causes like how well the mix is done and the quality
of the mixture. Cost of constructing the pavement is usually expensive. It also
consists of the cost of crush / round particles aggregate which is high. Meanwhile,
the cost of flat and elongated particle is cheaper than angular particle. So, in this
research, the angular particle in HMA is changed with the flat and elongated
particles. This research is conducted to test whether the flat and elongated
aggregate can be used in the pavement mixture or not. The alternative is also
designed to reduce the cost of low traffic pavement construction and to extend the
life of the new facilities besides to effectively combat an aging highway
infrastructure. Moreover, a better road can be designed for a low traffic road so that
the road user will have a better road quality in the future. But, if only the
characteristics and strength of the mixes meet the specification then the flat and
elongated particle can be used in the mix for low traffic road. That is why the
strength of normal mix and experimental mix is compared.
8
1.4 Objectives
The objectives of this research are to:
i. To evaluate the performance of pavement mixes designed using flat and
elongated material.
ii. To compare the strength of flat and elongated pavement mixes and standard
pavement mixes in accordance to specification for low traffic road.
1.5 Scope of Study
The limitation for the this pavement design is:
a. The design is only for low traffic road : For this case study, a specification
of low traffic road will be used as a guidelines in making comparisons on
pavement strength.
b. Using flat and elongated aggregate as one of the material : Flat and
elongated aggregates will be used to replace a small portion of coarse
aggregate having round and angular shaped. The percentage of flat and
elongated aggregate in each mixes are grouped into three different group
which is 0%, 20%, 40% and 60%. Flat and elongated aggregate will not
replace the whole amount of coarse aggregate but only a small part of it
while the rest of coarse aggregate will maintain using normal aggregate.
9
c. This design is only apply to HMA only: HMA is usually used for pavement
design for road in Malaysia.
1.6 Significant of Study
This research aims to create a new approach in pavement design by using
different type shape of aggregate. it is done in order to find a way to reduce the cost
of constructing a new pavement for certain area as it is known that constructing a
new pavement is a bit pricey. This research will allow for an explicit study on the
new approach in pavement design which may be useful to the Public Works
Department PWD) of the Ministry of Works Malaysia and the road engineer in
order to mitigate the problems that rise due to the construction of new pavement.
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction
An economical and adequate design is one of the important element in
pavement design. An underdesigned pavement will fail prematurely and costing
more money for repairs (Asphalt Institute, 1989). It is therefore important to
recognize that the proper selection of aggregate is pertinent to the achievement
of the desired performance of bituminous paving mixtures (Oduroh, P.K, 1999).
The design of a pavement structure is very important because it directly affects
on the construction and maintenance of the pavement. A good design would give
a great benefit to the economy if the life of the road could be extended.