STUDY on The PRoVISIon of InTeRnATIonAL ASSISTAnCe AnD ...phase1.pprdeast2.eu/assets/files/Publications/HNS Study.pdf · INSARAG MCDA MIRA MoU NATO NGO OCHA OSOCC POC PS(s) SCPES

Civil Protection and Disaster Management

STUDY on The PRoVISIon of InTeRnATIonAL ASSISTAnCe AnD hoST nATIon SUPPoRT

EU funded Programme

Developed by EU-funded Programme for the Prevention, Preparedness and Responseto Man-made and Natural Disasters in the ENPI East Region (PPRD East)

EEU-funded pr

rogramme fo

STINTE

or the Preven

TUDYERNAT

HOST

ntion, PreparENPI Ea

Y on thTIONAT NAT

redness andast Region (P

he PRAL ASTION

Response toPPRD East)

ROVISSSISTASUPP

o natural and

SION oANCEPORT

d man-made

of E and

e disasters in

the

Developed by EU-funded Programme for the Prevention, Preparedness and Response to Man-made and Natural Disasters in the ENPI East Region (PPRD East

1 PREFACE

The Study on the Provision of International Assistance and Host Nation Support (hereinafter the Study) presented hereby was undertaken within the scope of the Programme on Prevention, Preparedness and Response to man-made and natural Disasters in the ENPI East Region (PPRD East), running as part of the Eastern Partnership Flagship Initiatives between 2010 and 2014 and financed by the European Union.

The overall objective of the Programme is to contribute to the peace, stability, security and prosperity of the Eastern Partner Countries1 and to protect the environment, the population, the cultural heritage, the resources and the infrastructure of the region by strengthening the Partner Countries’ resilience, prevention, preparedness and response to natural and man-made disasters.

This Study is considered as an analysis of the existing status of the legislation and structures of the Partner Countries relevant to the provision of international assistance and host nation support, as well as an input for the eventual development of regional guidelines on cross-border movement of disaster relief assistance including expert teams, equipment and in-kind assistance.

The terminology used, the interpretations, findings and conclusions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission.

The Study has the following structure, including annexes:

Chapter 1: Preface Chapter 2: Abbreviations and acronyms Chapter 3: Glossary of terms Chapter 4: Executive summary Chapter 5 Methodology Chapter 6: HNS in the Partner Countries Chapter 7: General conclusions

Annex I: Online questionnaire summary Annex II: HNS guidelines per Beneficiary country Annex III: Acknowledgements

This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of the PPRD East Team and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.

1 Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine

TABLE O

1 PRE

2 ABB

3 GLO

4 EXE

5 MET

5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4

6 HNS

6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6

7 GEN

8 ANN

9 ANN

10 ANN

Develo

OF CONTE

EFACE .........

BREVIATION

OSSARY OF T

CUTIVE SUM

THODOLOG

UNDERLYINGLIMITATIONSWHAT GUIDTHE RESEAR

S IN THE PA

ARMENIA ...AZERBAIJANBELARUS ....GEORGIA ...MOLDOVA .UKRAINE ....

NERAL CONC

NEX I – QUE

NEX II – HNS

NEX III – AC

oped by EU-fundean

ENT

..................

NS AND ACR

TERMS ......

MMARY ....

GY ..............

G ASSUMPTIOS ................

DELINES? .......CH ..............

ARTNER COU

..................N .................

..................

..................

..................

..................

CLUSIONS .

ESTIONNAIR

S GUIDELIN

CKNOWLEDG

ed Programme fornd Natural Disaste

..................

RONYMS ...

..................

..................

..................

NS ....................................................................

UNTRIES ....

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

RE SUMMA

NES PER PAR

GEMENTS ..

r the Prevention, Pers in the ENPI Eas

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

...................

...................

...................

...................

..................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

..................

ARY ............

RTNER COU

..................

Preparedness andst Region (PPRD Ea

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

...................

...................

...................

...................

..................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

..................

..................

UNTRY ........

..................

Response to Manast)

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

...................

...................

...................

...................

..................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

...................

..................

..................

..................

..................

n-made

.................

.................

.................

.................

.................

..................

..................

..................

..................

.................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

..................

.................

.................

.................

.................

3

............ 2

............ 4

............ 5

............ 6

............ 8

............. 8

............. 9

........... 10

........... 13

.......... 15

........... 15

........... 22

........... 22

........... 26

........... 33

........... 41

.......... 48

.......... 50

.......... 56

.......... 58

4

2 AB

BSEC

CIS

CPM

EADRCC

ECHO

EMD

ERCC

EU

ENPI

GUUAM

HNS

HQ

IDRL

ICT

IFRC

INSARAG

MCDA

MIRA

MoU

NATO

NGO

OCHA

OSOCC

POC

PS(s)

SCPES

SOP(s)

TOR

USAR

Develo

BBREVIATI

Black See

Commonw

Union Civi

Euro-Atlan

European

Emergenc

Emergenc

European

European

The GUUA

Host Natio

Headquart

Internatio

Informatio

Internatio

Internatio

Military an

Multi-Clus

Memoran

North Atla

Non-gover

(United Na

On-site Op

Point of co

Participati

Service of

Standard O

Terms of R

Urban Sea

oped by EU-fundean

IONS AND

Economic Co

wealth of Ind

l Protection

ntic Disaster

Commission

y Manageme

y Response C

Union

Neighbourh

AM Group, in

on Support

ters

nal Disaster

on and Comm

nal Federatio

nal Search a

nd civil defen

ster/Sector In

dum of Unde

antic Treaty O

rnmental org

ations) Office

perations Co

ontact

ing State(s) o

Civil Protect

Operating Pr

Reference

arch and Resc


D ACRONY

ooperation

dependent St

Mechanism

Response an

n (Directorate

ent Departm

Coordination

ood and Par

ncluding Geo

Response La

munication T

on of the Re

nd Rescue A

nce assets

nitial Rapid A

erstanding

Organization

ganization

e for the Coo

ordination C

of the Europe

tion and Eme

rocedure(s)

cue


YMS

tates

nd Coordinat

e General) H

ment, Ministr

n Centre of t

rtnership Inst

orgia, Ukraine

aw (within IF

Technology

d Cross and

Advisory Grou

Assessment c

n

ordination of

Centre

ean Civil Pro

ergency Situa


tion Centre

Humanitarian

ry of Interior

he European

trument

e, Uzbekistan

FRC)

Red Crescen

up

concept in A

f Humanitari

tection Mec

ations, Minis

Response to Manast)

n Aid and Civ

of Georgia

n Commissio

n, Azerbaijan

nt Societies

rmenia

ian Affairs

hanism

stry of Interio

n-made

vil Protection

on

n and Moldo

or, Moldova

n

ova

3 GL

Differenton the coand actodifferent

So as to defined iacceptedwork.

Assisting s

Civil prote

Civil prote

Common awarenes

Damage a

Donor cou

Eligible in

Gap analy

Host natio

Host natio

Develo

LOSSARY O

t HNS-relateontext they ors have dift terms for t

avoid confin the follo

d interpreta

state

ection assista

ection actors

situational ss

assessment

untries / age

ternational a

ysis

on

on support

oped by EU-fundean

OF TERMS

ed guidelinare produc

fferent meathe same m

fusion or mowing table.ation of the

A ki

ance Emasgoasit

s En

A emin

Evto

encies Cth

actors Inasby

Evid

Thfow

Pre


S

es and recoced in or whaning of th

meaning.

misundersta. Since thes

ese terms, t

state offeriind assistanc

mergency assets, but overnment ssistance andhas been of

ntities and in

complete anmergency by

nformation m

valuation of o properties,

ountries / aghe conseque

nternational ssistance, why the host na

valuation ofdentified

he state thatoreign interv

with the cons

rovision of femove as m


ommendatiho their usee same ter

anding, the se definitiothey shall so

ing and provce, expert tea

aid, includinno direct

to another d irrespectivffered / deliv

ntervention t

nd unanimouy all respons

management

the disaster, facilities an

gencies that nces of the d

(i.e. not oho are considation or tran

f resources

t receives invention teamequences of

facilities renduch as poss


ions use dife is intendedrm, based o

terminologns might nolely be un

viding civil pams and serv

g interventfinancial aone, based

ve of the coovered.

teams provid

us understansible actors (t)

r situation, sd infrastruct

give financiadisaster

of the hostdered eligibl

nsit country

generally av

ternational dms and in-kif a disaster

dered by theible any fore

Response to Manast)

fferent termd for. Also, don their sco

gy used in ot correspoderstood in

rotection asvices

ion teams, assistance,

d on a requordination str

ding civil pro

nding of all ei.e. proper a

pecifically asture

al aid / direc

t nation) ace to receive

vailable agai

disaster relieind assistanc

e host nationeseeable obs

n-made

minology, ddifferent inope of wor

this Study ond to the n the conte

ssistance, inc

services anprovided f

uest for intructure thro

otection assis

effects of theassessment a

s regards the

ct funding to

ctors providthe facilities

inst the all-

ef assistancece / materia

n or transit cstacle to int

5

epending stitutions

rk, or use

is clearly generally

ext of this

cluding in-

nd in-kind from one ternational ugh which

stance

e disaster / and proper

e damages

o eliminate

ding relief s rendered

-time risks

, including al to cope

country to ternational

6

HNS Team

Humanita

Humanita

In-kind as

Mechanis

Needs ass

Participat

Partner C

Risk asses

Transit co

4 EX

When a cthe affecprovide aemergen

Lessons lcan be e

Develo

m / Cell

arian actors

arian aid

ssistance

sm

sessment

ting States

ountries / Pa

ssment

ountry

XECUTIVE S

call goes oucted populaassistance.

ncy assistan

learned froenhanced n

oped by EU-fundean

do

A beasad

N

Dphfr

Dd

U

Evpo

StMYu

artners CA

Thhadfrvu

A re

SUMMAR

ut for help ation and oNot many cce can be to

m past emenot only by


isaster relieperations pr

team, estabetween thessistance tedequate pro

on-profit en

isaster relierovided direumanitarian rom donor co

onations thairect funding

nion Civil Pro

valuation of opulation aff

tates participMember Stat

ugoslav Repu

ountries, wzerbaijan, Be

he process oarmful conseisrupted ecorom interactulnerable co

state througelief assistan

RY

after a disaon the effoconsider, hoo the overa

ergencies hy strengthe


ef assistanceroceed smoo

blished by the host natioeams / consvision of hos

tities provid

ef assistancectly to the actors, in tountries and

at are done g

otection Me

the situatiofected

pating in thetes, plus Iceublic of Mac

who benefit elarus, Georg

of determiniequences – c

onomic activitions betwenditions.

gh whose tence

aster, the atorts the intowever, holl success o

ave shown ening the r


e so as toothly

he host natioon and thesignments, st nation sup

ing humanit

e, includinge (services he majority

d donor agen

in goods an

echanism

n after the d

e European Celand, Lichteedonia)

from this gia, Moldova

ng the naturcasualties, dity and damaeen natural

rritory an as

ttention is ernational w critical thf the opera

that the efresponse ca

Response to Manast)

ensure th

on, that is toincoming f

with the ppport during

arian aid

g materials of) the affof cases witcies

nd services r

disaster to g

Civil Protectioenstein, Nor

ENPI Progra and Ukrain

re and extenamaged pro

age to the enor human-

sisting state

rightly focurelief comm

he preparattion.

ffectivenessapabilities,

n-made

hat disaster

o serve as a foreign disaurpose of fthe operatio

and suppofected poputh the help

rather than

gauge the ne

on Mechanisrway and th

ramme, i.e. e

nt of the prooperty, lost linvironment, -induced ha

transports i

used on themunity is mtions to rec

s of relief obut also b

response

direct link ster relief facilitating ons

ort teams, ulation by of funding

money or

eds of the

sm (i.e. EU he former

Armenia,

obability of ivelihoods, - resulting zards and

ts disaster

needs of making to ceive such

perations by getting

preparedestablishGuidelinehelp govto hinder

The moswhilst bufacilitatioimprove and recenon-bind

Thereforthe Progplanning and strusupport preparedopportunbasis of t

To map within thdecided tquestionapplicablsource, thave fouwas therthe possenhance countriescountriesnot a scrimprove as possibevaluatio

The findi

Asu

Develo

d for receivhed in the mes have beeernments cr smooth re

st recent inuilt on exison of assistsolidarity aive assistan

ding guidelin

re, HNS hasramme, byof the exer

ctures of tand thus co

dness to intnity and seethis work.

the actual he Partner to gather innaire as wle, other cthe questiound it difficrefore decidsibility to i

the unders. In additios and maderutiny exertheir system

ble and it wons.

ngs of the S

All Partner coupport, whi

oped by EU-fundean

ving foreignmilitary, hasen elaborat

consider andelief operati

itiative, thesting interntance operamongst thnce in case ones into acc

s taken promy being intercises. This he Partner ontributes tternational e the poten

situation ocountries

nformation well as froompilationsnnaire, how

cult to answded to condndividualizerstanding oon, we beliee them bettcise, but toms. To this would draw

Study can b

ountries haich serves a


n assistanc only recented in seved eventuallyions on thei

e EU Host Nnational recrations unde Participatof need undcount.

minent pargrated as aStudy, aimiCountries,

to the overoperations

ntial for the

of implemenseveral resfrom the anm openly s, if relevawever, provwer the numduct in-coue the quesof the reseeve, this couter understo provide tend, it was

w only gene

e summariz

ve rules ans a good ba


e. Host nantly been ga

ral differeny remove air territories

Nation Supcommendatder the Uniting States.der this fram

rt of the civa key subjecing to depic raises awarall objectivs. It is also e eventual

ntation of search technswer Partnavailable

nt, under ved to be inmerous quentry intervi

stions in a earchers abuld also givand that th

them with s also decideral conclus

zed as follow

d practices asis for any


tion suppoaining grounnt fora to aall foreseeabs.

port Guidetions and pion Civil Pr Third counmework are

vil protectioct also in thct the existiareness of ve of strenghoped thatimproveme

HNS or HNhniques havner countrieresources, this Progra

nsufficient aestions reqiews in the

more persbout the exve ground tohe major aimpotential ined that this

sions, witho

ws:

in place thafurther pro

Response to Manast)

ort, the connd in the disddress the ble obstacle

lines adoptpractices sprotection Mntries that ae also encou

on capacity he training ng status othe import

gthening tht the Partneent of their

S-related pve been uses provided

such as pamme, for as Partner cuesting deshope that

sonal set-uxisting systeo trust fromm of complnsight of hos Study shouout individu

at pertain toogress in this

n-made

ncept alreasaster relieissue, whic

es with the

ted in Janupecifically tMechanism

are likely touraged to t

building pacurricula a

of relevant ltance of hoe Partner Cers will emr HNS syste

provisions ised. Initiall

d to a comppieces of l

example. Tcountries sescriptive anthey would

up and thuems of the

m the side oleting the Sow they cauld be as d

ual (i.e. per

o host natios field

7

ady firmly f context. ch aim to potential

ary 2012, arget the and thus o request ake these

ackage of nd in the egislation

ost nation Countries’ brace the m on the

n general ly, it was rehensive egislation The main eemed to nswers. It d provide

us further e Partner of Partner Study was an further escriptive r country)

on

8

Tcoco

Ninanco

Itas

Top

Rbar

5 ME

5.1 Un

GovernmdevelopmDuring thwere reiprotect pconsequein most seen as c

On the oPartner Cthe Soviecivil proacknowlecertain dfocused p

Develo

he inter-insooperation oordination

No specific enterventionny eventuaomplex disa

t is of outmossistance in

o successfuersonnel

egional cooe further derrangement

ETHODOL

nderlying a

ments of thement of thehe last decnforced an

people, propences of thPartners th

competent a

ther hand, Countries caet Union thtection actedge the redegree of gprimarily on

oped by EU-fundean

stitutional cstructures

n challenges

experiencess. It is there

al weaknessaster scenar

ost importanto the natio

ully establish

operation ineveloped; bts than poli

LOGY

assumptio

e Partner Ceir respectivcade the dind moderniperty and this process h

he civil protand reliable

the civil proan be consi

hat the focutivities; a fecent procegeneralization emergenc


oordinationhas the pots once host

in relation efore quests of their prio.

ance to cononal coordin

h and run a

n the field obased on extical consid

ons

Countries pve countriesaster manzed in ordhe environmhas been thtection aute.

otection / ddered relat

us shifted ffact also csses at globon it can bcy response


n structurestential to renation sup

to host nattionable howresent, sec

sider the mnation struc

a HNS syste

of mutual axisting connderations.

pay significaes’ resiliencnagement ser to answment from he increase thorities ha

disaster pretively youngfrom the hiconfirmed bal level anbe stated the.


s at nationaeduce cross-port is cons

tion supporw mindful t

ctor-specific

modalities ofctures.

m Partner c

assistance aections, bu

ant politicale to the nasystems in

wer their mhazards of dof public trve a rather

paredness ag, because ighly militarby legislatid the needhat their ci

Response to Manast)

l level, as a-sector and sidered as a

t have beenthe Partnerc arrangeme

f how to int

countries ne

and host nat with more

and financatural and mmost of th

main purposdifferent tyrust to the r positive im

and managit was only rized civil don. Also, t for disastevil protecti

n-made

lready exist inter-instit

a wider conc

n acquired fr countries aents in rela

tegrate inte

eed proper

ation suppoe focus on f

cial attentioman-made he Partner se, i.e. to epe. One of emergencymage and

ement systafter the co

defence methough all

er preventioion system

ting tutional cept.

from past are about ation to a

ernational

ly trained

ort should functional

on to the disasters. Countries efficiently the social

y services; are often

ems in all ollapse of asures to Partners

on, with a s are still

All Partnhoweverthere is a

In this fiethe regiocoordinathat the transportdevelopmhoweveraffected

It is impodoes notrecommethe Studydata theymaking tMechaniacknowle

5.2 Lim

Given thereceiving

Similarly,and shadevelopm

Though responsibpurpose transit co

Media hapreparatRelation not featu

2 Refer to f

Develo

ner Countrir, still to bea need for in

eld, at the on, with altion mecharecomment, together ment of HNr, the possthe Partner

ortant to ut intend to endations iy has been y provided the findingsm, howevedged and r

mitations

e overall sug civil protec

, the Studyll not tou

ment-relate

the diffebilities of aof the Stu

ountries.

andling andion for inteto third par

ure in this p

further details

oped by EU-fundean

ies have dee examinednternationa

moment Nl Partners anisms of adations of with all its

NS-related pibilities thar countries’

underline agassess whenternationavoluntary. and also a

gs open to ver, some respected2.

ubject of thction assista

y concentrach early w

ed assistanc

erent intessisting stady is to de

d other puberventions rties, mainlyroject.

s under the in


eveloped ind and verifial disaster re

NATO may bbeing part

and operatiothe NATO Ms templates

proceduresat all othe HNS arrang

gain that thether the Paally availablIn a declarny eventuaother Partreservatio

is whole Prance is give

tes on the warning, rise.

ernational tes and org

escribe the

blic communincluding asy engaged i

ndividual coun


nternationaed how thelief assista

be considerof NATO/E

onal links tMemorandus, have beewithin the r compilatigements.

his work shartner counle. Thereforation, eachl finding, wtner countons from

ogramme iten primary a

phase of psk reductio

guidelinesganisations

capacities

nication forssistance oin humanita

ntry reports in


al cooperate relevant

ance.

red an impoEAPC and tto NATO/EAum of Undeen taken inPartner Co

ions of rel

hall not impntries compre, the cont

h participatiwith the Eur

ries and / certain Pa

t has been attention in

preparedneon, preven

and recas well, it of the Ben

rms are notf military narian aid, su

n Chapter 6.

Response to Manast)

tion to a clinks functi

ortant coopthus possibADRCC. It iserstanding oto primary

ountries. Thevant guid

ply any scruply with anytribution ofng country

ropean Comor Particip

artner cou

decided tha this Study.

ess and firsttion, long-

commendatwas under

neficiaries a

t covered innature is nouch as NGOs

n-made

certain exteion in prac

peration strbly benefitins therefore on vital cro

y account dhis does notdelines have

utiny procey of the HNf the Benefi

agreed to mmission. Apating Statentries hav

at HNS in re.

t response -term reco

tions inclrstood that as host nat

n this Studyot consideres and volun

9

ent, it is, ctice once

ructure in ng of the assumed

oss-border uring the t exclude, e equally

edure and NS-related iciaries to share the

As regards es of the

ve to be

elation to

activities very and

ude the the main

tions and

y. Equally, ed either. nteers will

10

The Studnor doesthat it wconsider

5.3 Wh

As variouhad to bfor this relevant relevant organizatcountries

E

IFre

N

IN

O

Some seTampereConventi

Having enone of “guidelinsubstant

- Tararstye

- Tcira

Develo

dy does nots it aim to owill offer fo

any eventu

hat guide

us compilate decided fStudy. Maiand / or afor civil p

tions that s, etc. There

U Host Nati

FRC Guidelielief and ini

NATO Memo

NSARAG Gu

Oslo Guidelin

ector-specife Conventioion on custo

xamined ththe “gene

nes” were iated by the

he EU Hostre relativelyre all potetructures ofet to this co

he IDRL guiivil protectiather only f

oped by EU-fundean

t intend to offer recomood for thoual need for

lines?

tions of HNfirst which sinly those applicable fprotection the Partne

efore the fo

ion Support

nes for thetial recover

orandum of

idelines (Se

nes (Art. 51

fic recommon, the Istaoms proced

hese documeral” ones elaborated e following

t Nation Suy new set oential benef the Mechaooperation

delines addon assistan

from a legal


evaluate thmendation

ought and tr improvem

NS-related gset of themmajor comfor this woassistance

ers are parollowings ha

t Guidelines

e domestic ry assistanc

f Understan

ector D2, “A

1-57)

mendations nbul conve

dures.

ents also incould be for the p

considerati

upport Guidof recommeeficiaries ofanism, the so that thes

dress a mucce interven than pract


he prepares to them ithe opportent in their

guidelines am should bempilations work, such as

interventirty to, or tave been co

s

facilitatione (IDRL Gui

ding on vita

Affected cou

relevant tention on t

n light of theused aloneurposes ofions:

delines withendations. Af the assisPartner couse guideline

ch wider spentions coverical point o


dness of thndividuallyunity to thr systems.

and recomme taken intowere resears for e.g. tons, or arthose alreaonsidered:

n and regudelines)

al cross-bor

untry respo

to HNS weemporary a

e scope of oe as baselif the Study

hin the UniAdditionallystance provuntries cannes are fully

ectrum of inr. Also, theyf view.

Response to Manast)

he individua. On the ote Partner c

mendations considerat

rched that hose covere “product

ady in prac

lation of in

rder transpo

nsibilities”)

ere also stadmission a

our work, itne data, by. This con

on Civil Proy, though thvided undenot be consrelevant to

nternationay tend to ap

n-made

al Partner cher hand itcountries t

s are in exition as basehave been

ring subjectts” of intectice in the

nternationa

ort

tudied, sucand the 20

t was conclubut a specinsideration

otection Mhe Partner er the coosidered clostheir opera

al disaster rpproach the

countries, t is hoped to further

stence, it eline data n deemed t matters

ernational e Partner

l disaster

h as the 006 Kyoto

uded that ial set of was also

echanism countries

ordination se enough ations.

elief than e question

- Tacas

- Tin

The folloaccount partially,

1 EM

1.1 Legass

1.2 Insto

1.3 Deiderel

1.4 Neass

1.5 Infinfma

1.6 Eninc

1.7 Preinc

1.8 Allris

2 EM

2.1 Enass

2.2 Us

2.3 Coint

2.4 HNint

3 LO

3.1 Ide

3.2 Waan

Develo

he INSARAcknowledgessistance in

he Oslo guinvolvement

owing tablefor this Stu in the sam

MERGENCY P

gal framewosistance stitutional andeal with inc

ecision makinentified resplation to incoeeds assessmsess situatioformation mformation wiaintenance osure relevan

coming interepare countrcoming inter-sector risk aks v. resourc

MERGENCY M

sure accuratsessment e template f

oordination sternational aNS Team / ceternational te

OGISTICS AND

entify border

aive visa reqd transit

oped by EU-fundean

AG guidelined, that th

nterventions

idelines addt of such ass

e summarizudy, also dee or similar

PLANNING

ork in place to

nd administrcoming assisng system in onsibilities ooming assista

ment methodn and needs anagement sith internatio

of a national nt training ofnational assiry profile to national teaassessment ices) analysis MANAGEMEN

te and timely

for request f

structure in passistance ell in place toeams D TRANSPOR

r crossing / e

uirements o


nes target hese guides, too).

dress the usets is highl

es the seleetailing in wr meaning.

o deal with i

ative framewstance place with c

of key authorance

dology in plac

system in plaonal actors (iPOC)

f personnel distance be handed oms in place, incl

NT

y situation an

or internatio

place to deal

o assist incom

RT

entry points

r grant visas


operationelines could

se of MCDAighted in th

ected HNS-which othe

ncoming

work in place

clearly rities, also in

ce to quickly

ace to share incl.

dealing with

over to

. a gap (i.e.

nd needs

onal assistan

with incomi

ming

in advance

s for entry, ex


ns of USAd easily be

A in disastehese guideli

related issuer existing g

The

Stu

dy

X

e X

n X

y X

X

X

ce X

ing X

xit X

Response to Manast)

AR teams e adapted

er relief; thenes

ues that haguidelines t

EU H

NS

Guid

elin

es

IDRL

G

idli

X X

X

X X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X X

X

X

X X

n-made

only (thouto civil p

e particular

ave been tathey appea

Gui

delin

es

INSA

RAG

Guid

elin

es

NAT

O

X

X

X

X

X

11

ugh it is protection

rity of the

aken into r, fully or

NAT

O

Chec

klis

t

Osl

o Gu

idel

ines

X X

X

X

X

X

X X

X X

12

3.3 Wagotea

3.4 Wado

3.5 Prewatra

3.6 Reuse

3.7 Reuse

3.8 Reuse

3.9 Reuseop

3.10 Pedo

3.11 Enintrel

3.12 Pla

3.13 Prope

3.14 Prolod

3.15 Pro

4 LEG

4.1 Reof

4.2 Reint

4.3 Gr

4.4 Corel

4.5 Refunint

4.6 Coof

4.7 Grop

Develo

aive customsods and equams aive or reduc

ocumentationepare arrangaive tariffs, taansport duce barriere of ICT equiduce barriere of medicatduce barriere of search dduce barriere of hazardo

perations rmit re-expo

ogs, vehicles)sure approp

ternational rlief consignman for a Base

ovide adminrsonnel, tranovide subsistdging, electriovide medica

GAL AND FIN

cognize profinternationacognize the

ternational aant work pe

onsider issueslief personneduce barriernds and currternational ronsider proce

the incominant VAT-free

perations

oped by EU-fundean

s duties, taxeuipment (incl

ce inspectionn requiremegements for axes, tolls an

rs to the impipment rs to the imption and medrs to the impdogs rs to the impous material

ortation of eq and unusedriate securitelief personn

ments e of Operatio

istrative supnslation, equtence commicity, etc.) al support

NANCIAL ISS

fessional quaal relief persolegal status

actors rmits where

s of liability fel rs to the impencies neceselief actors edures to facg assistance

e / duty free


es, tariffs for. vehicles) of

n and adminnts in-country tr

nd other fees

port / export,

port / export,dical equipmport / export,

port / export,necessary fo

quipment (ind goods, eveny and safetynel, their equ

ons

pport (office, uipment, etcodities (food

SUES

alifications aonnel of personne

necessary

for damage c

port / export ssary for the

cilitate the refor in case ostatus for di


r donated f incoming

istrative /

ransport , incs in relation

, transit and

, transit and ment

, transit and

, transit and or relief

ncl. search n if donated

y of uipment and

admin. .) d, water,

nd certificat

l of assisting

caused by

and transit o operations

eimbursemeof need isaster relief


The

Stu

dy

X

X

cl. to

X

X

X

X

d X

X

X

X

es X

g X

X

of of

nt

Response to Manast)

EU H

NS

Guid

elin

es

IDRL

G

idli

X X

X X

X X

X X

X X

X

X

X X

X X

X X

X

X

X X

X X

X X

X

X

X

X

n-made

Gui

delin

es

INSA

RAG

Guid

elin

es

NAT

O

X

X

X

X

X

X

NAT

O

Chec

klis

t

Osl

o Gu

idel

ines

X X

X X

X

X X

X

X X

X X

X

X X

X

X

5.4 Th

Due to thinformatsubseque

The quesvarious rquestionphase all

In additioanalysis implemerelevant.

At this preflected

Wqwsy

Inois

Fow

It was ththis worpreparedthe Partnthe overa

Interviewmany of clarify thbeen rec

Develo

e researc

he very limion was prent request

stionnaire cresponse onaire was gowed for co

on, with speof legislat

entation of .

point of thed fully the ac

With some euestionnair

without offeystems duri

n addition, spenly availa

ssue, too.

rom the mther institu

was consulte

herefore dek, by cond

d on the baner countriall results e

ws could finthe outstan

he intent ofeived.

oped by EU-fundean

h

ited availabrimarily collts for clarific

contained boptions as wgeneralizedountry-spec

ecial attenttion of ththe Program

e research ctual situat

exceptions, re. In som

ering any exing the clari

supporting able. In this

missing answution than ted even on

ecided to aducting indivsis of availaes. Unfortuxpected.

nally be connding questf the origin


bility of reslected in thcations.

both simplewell as que, i.e. the sacific investig

ion to the dhe Partnermme activi

it was, howion in the P

Partner coue cases oplanatory aification req

documentss respect, la

wers we alhose respoquestions f

dd a more vidual interable inform

unately, how

ducted onlytions duringal question


ources withhe form of

e questionsestions req

ame for all Pgation.

data collecter countriesties, was a

wever, acknPartner coun

untries did nly the m

answer or thquest phase

s, i.e. relevaanguage an

so assumedonsible for cfalling unde

personal torviews in th

mation, withwever, this

y in Armeng the discus

nnaire, to w


hin the Proga very com

where thequesting dePartner cou

ed during ths, all inforlso assesse

nowledged, ntries, beca

not show eultiple-choihey did not e.

ant legislatid translatio

d, that, witcivil protectr the main

ouch to thehe Partner

h introducinphase of t

ia and Azerssions, in A

which, in th

Response to Manast)

gramme fomprehensive

e responderscriptive an

untries, the

he fact findrmation gad and inclu

that the duse

enthusiasm ice questioprovide fur

on was scaon resource

th very limtion / emerresponsibili

e research acountries.

ng country-she research

rbaijan. Whzerbaijan the end, no o

n-made

r this task, e questionn

r could chonswers. Thclarificatio

ing missionathered duuded in this

draft might

to contribuons were arther detail

rcely madees proved to

mited exceprgency manity of other

and conseqAll intervie

specific queh has not y

hile Armeniahe expert cofficial resp

13

originally naire and

oose from ough the n request

ns and the uring the s Study, if

not have

ute to the answered s on their

or found o be a big

ptions, no agement, sectors.

quently to ews were estions to yielded to

a clarified could only ponse has

14

In Belarusignalledposition or provid

Moldovainterviewcomplemunrest aconduct

Develo

us, it was n that due tto give furt

ded during t

had alreadw, which cmented the

nd politicalinterviews

oped by EU-fundean

not possiblto current pher answerthe request

dy providedcould not existing kn

l situation iin Kiev.


e to organprocesses tors and expla for clarifica

d significantbe organi

owledge ofin Ukraine


ize any into change alanation to tation proce

t amount ofized in thf researcheduring Ma


terview in tll relevant lhose alreadss.

f answers dhe given trs with furtrch and Ap

Response to Manast)

the given tegislation t

dy included

during the pime framether detailspril 2014 ma

n-made

time framethey were nin the ques

previous phe, could o. And lastlyade it impo

. Georgia not in the stionnaire

hases; the nly have

y, the civil ossible to

6 HN

The follocountriesdirectly dProgram

It must bcountriesshall be research

6.1 Ar

Armenia country legislatio

Overall f

From theprovisionthe otheexisting internati

Though operatioto receivsubstantinsufficie

In Armenconcept further iauthoritiemphasispersonne

Develo

NS IN THE

owing chaps currently during the rme as well

be noted ths civil protetherefore c.

menia

answered interview o

on.

findings

e data recens governiner hand, a

rules, regonal exercis

Armenia dns, in the s

ve internatioiated this

ent training

nia the civil of host natiinformationes is that ts being on el from diffe

oped by EU-fundean

PARTNER

ters contaiin place. Th

research foras openly a

hat the autection / disaconsidered

the questiorganized in

eived, Armg certain Hcomplete Hulations anse, organize

did not reself assessmonal assistamark withof involved

protection ion supportn has beenhe followinHNS. They eerent agenc


R COUNTR

n informathese are sor this Studyvailable.

hor did notaster manaas percept

onnaire ann April 201

enian authNS areas se

HNS systemnd practiceed in partne

port to hament exercisance an ave issues ari

d personnel,

/ disaster mt in generaln received. ng ENPI Proexpect an incies.


RIES

ion on HNSlely based o

y and found

t have any agement arrtion from a

nd numerou14 as well

orities haveem to be i

m has not bes could bership with

ave experise of the qerage 3.5 oising from , and some

managemen. In addition Thereforegrammes sncreased nu


S or HNS-reon the data in other do

preliminaryrangementsall informat

us questionas after ha

e a good gin place undbeen institube verified NATO EADR

enced anyuestionnairut of 5.0. Wnot sufficiproblems r

nt sector is n, other sec

e one of thhould keepumber of co

Response to Manast)

elated arraa provided bocuments e

y knowledgs; all the betion made

s were claraving consu

grasp of thder the resutionalized.

during thRCC.

y major prre they rateWithout anyient legislarelated to lo

reported toctors may ahe requirem

p the focus ourses in or

n-made

ngement oby Partner

elaborated u

ge about thelow presenavailable d

rified durinulted some

he HNS conponsible se. The functhe “Armen

roblem due their prepy further dtive covera

ogistics.

o be familiarlso be awarments of Aon training

rder to invo

15

of Partner countries under the

e Partner nted data uring the

ng the in-e relevant

ncept and ectors. On tioning of nia 2010”

ring past paredness etail they age, with

r with the re, but no Armenian gs, special olve more

16

Findings

The followere ide

EMERGENCY

Legal framewincoming int

Develo

by HNS top

owing table ntified duri

Y PLANNING

work applicaternational a

oped by EU-fundean

pics

summarizeng the rese

G

able for assistance


es all measuearch.

Bilateral aMontenegUkraine.

Armenia hinternatioTampere procedure

Other rele

- Agreethe Rorganon enmann

- AgreeCoopeemergman-

- Agreeconsetechn

Major piethough, a

- Em

- Gas

- Gpo

Applicabledecree is force a ra


ures ensuri

agreementsgro, Poland,

has signed uonal agreemConvention,es and the N

evant intern

ement betweRepublic of Anizing importntry of personer during di

ement amoneration (BSE

rgency assist-made disast

ement on coequences of nological nat

eces of applicat this stage,

Emergency A

Government as humanitar

Government opulation pr

e legislation being plann

ange of emer


ng host nat

s are in forceRussia, Swit

p to / pledgements / guide

, the 2006 KyNATO MoU o

ational agree

een the Unitrmenia was t, export andnnel of humsasters and e

ng the GoverEC) Participatance and emters, signed o

ooperation inemergency sture of the C

cable nationait is unclear

ction Plan of

Decree No. 6rian aid.

Decree No. 9rotection pla

is under theed to be adorgency powe

Response to Manast)

tion suppor

with Belarutzerland, Swe

ed to / aligneelines affectiyoto Convenn vital cross-

ements:

ted Nations aconcluded in

d transit of huanitarian assemergency s

rnments of thting States o

mergency reson 15 April 1

n preventionsituations of

CIS countries

al legislationwhich HNS p

f governmen

66-N of 2003

919 of 10 Junan in case of

e process of ropted beforers that may

n-made

rt in Armen

s, China, Geoeden, Turkm

ed with the fing host natition on cust-border tran

and the Govn January 20umanitariansistance in a situations.

the Black Seaon collaborasponse to na1998

n and liquidaf natural andsigned on 2

n include theprovisions ar

ntal organiza

3 on the goo

ne 2011 on tf a strong ea

review and ae 2015. It wilbe enacted a

nia, which

orgia, menistan, and

following on support: oms sport.

vernment of 014 on goods and simplified

a Economic ation in atural and

ation of d

22 Jan 1993

followings, re included:

ations

ods provided

the arthquake

a new l bring into as a result of

d

d

f

Institutionaladministratimanagemento incomingassistance

Risk assessm(risks v. avai

Develo

l, decision mive and infornt structuresg internationa

ment and gapilable resour

oped by EU-fundean

making, rmation s in relation al

p analysis rces)


or during revealed a

The data have resp

Ministry manages

Ministry medical amedical p

Ministry oimport pr

Ministry o

Ministry coordinat

Police- en

Ministry ocommunic

Civil aviaairports) -services a

During thfollowing Ministry oand Custoand Commreiteratedtime all thopportunemergencassistancean excellebest pract

This HNS

In the la


disaster. At about this de

available revponsibilities c

of Emergenall the rescu

of Health-assistance a

personnel;

of Finance (rocedures of

of Agricultur

of Foreigntion of reque

nsure securit

of communiication servic

ation genera- comprehen

at the airport

e in-countryinstitutions

of Agriculturoms Commitmunication, d how imporhe above insity to underscy situationse is needed. ent basis for tices as well

area was int

ast years, J


this point, hecree.

vealed the foconcerning in

ncy Situatioue activities;

carries ouand regulat

(State Revenall the rescu

re- food , and

n Affairs –est for interna

y and safety;

ication and tces;

al departmensive assistant level;

y interview towere also ree, Police (Mitee (MinistryMinistry of H

rtant a step htitutions to dstand their r reaching theThe achievefuture coopas shortcom

troduced onl

JICA suppor

Response to Manast)

owever, no s

ollowing instincoming inte

ons- coordin

ut drug/medtes the prob

ue Committee equipment

d rescue dog

– simplifiedational assis

;

transport- pr

nt (Zvartnotnce and prov

o clarify outsepresented: inistry of Intey of Finance)Health. Afterhad been takdiscuss HNS oles and rese level whenments of thieration and t

mings.

y for the inte

rted Armen

n-made

specific data

itutions of Aernational as

nate the wh

dicine contrblems of th

ee)- simplifiet and goods;

g control;

d visa procstance proces

rovision of tr

ts/ Gyumri ivision of all th

standing queMinistry of Ferior), State ), Ministry ofr the meetingken to involvissues. It gaponsibilities

n internationis meeting cothe identific

erviews.

nian authori

17

a could be

Armenia that ssistance:

hole process,

rol, provideshe incoming

ed customs&;

cedures andss;

ransport and

internationahe necessary

estions the Finance, Revenues f Transport g it was

ve the first ve them thefor

nal ould provideation of

ities to run

,

s g

&

d

d

l y

e

e

n

18

Standardizemethodologsituation anpopulation

EMERGENCY

Accurate anneeds assess

Use of existiinternationa

Coordinatiodeal with incassistance

Develo

d needs assegy to assess td needs of t

Y MANAGEM

d timely situsment

ing templateal assistance

n structure icoming inter

oped by EU-fundean

essment the he

MENT

uation and

e to request

n place to rnational


earthquakmanagemprocess wrespond a

Multi-Clusimplemen

In additioprocedurephysical ethis are stCommittedamage tinsurance

ResponsibForeign A

Outstandi

Since the needed ondivision ofas on howdecision minternatioYes, mostINSARAG internatio

Accordingmake thebased on decision ias the con

Once the it’s local e

For the mnational capplies.


ke assessmment of conwas identifieand eliminat

ster/sector Inted in coop

on, the Govere for the ass

entities as a rtipulated in tee for assessto property ine purposes, s

bility of the MAffairs, Minist

ding question

legislation isn the proces

of roles and rw the data comaking chainonal assistant probably owguidelines. I

onal actors.

g to Governme final decisio

the advice os then implentact point f

internationaemergency m

moment, intecoordination


ent and tonsequencesed that addie the conseq

nitial Rapid Aeration with

rnment decressment of dresult of emethe standardsment of damn principle, tstill to be con

Ministry of Etry of Econo

ns

s in developms, on the cooesponsibilitieollected on nn, especially nce. wn templateIt is used for

ment Decreeon on any reqof the Ministemented by tor internatio

al teams arrimanagement

rnational assn structures o

Response to Manast)

gether withprocess wastional resou

quences of e

Assessment UNDP.

ee 1582 of 2damage sustergency situa

d operating pmage. As thesthe main objnfirmed.

mergency Simy, in line w

ment stage, fordination mes of the mineeds and daas regards th

e developed acommunica

919 of 1985quest for intery of Emergethe Ministry onal partners

ve and start t staff respon

sistance is inon ad-hoc ba

n-made

h experts fs analyzed.

urces may bearthquakes

(MIRA) conc

2011 sets up tained by legations. Furth

procedures fose provisionective is rec

ituations. Mwith MIRA.

further explamechanism annistries involvamages is fedhe request fo

according totion with all

5 the Prime Mernational aency Situatioof Foreign A

s.

operate in tnsibility to su

ntegrated witasis; no stand

from RussiaDuring this

e needed toin Armenia

cept was

the gal and her details ofor the s consider koned to be

inistry of

anation is nd the ved, as well d into the or

o the

Minister is tossistance,

ons. This Affairs, acting

he country upport them

thin the dard rule

, s o

f

o

g

LOGISTICS A

Waive visa rvisas for ent

Waive custofor donated (incl. vehicle

Inspection adocumentatreduced / w

Barriers to ttransit and uare reduced

Barriers to ttransit and umedical equ

Develo

AND TRANSP

requirementstry, exit and t

oms duties, tgoods and e

es) of incomi

and administtion requirem

waived

he import / euse of ICT eq

he import / euse of medicuipment are r

oped by EU-fundean

PORT

s or grant transit

axes, tariffs equipment ng teams

rative / ments are

export, quipment

export, cation and reduced


Yes.

CIS and Erequestedexperienctype of reagency), athis decre

Yes

Yes. Stateresponse to complecircumsta

Special focrossing /

Most pro

GovernmoperationemergencTransportcommunicare of coemergencapproveddecree doequipmen

In accordaof importArmenia. medical p


U Member Sd for internace limitationesponding acas specified iee still to be s

e Revenues Cto a disaster

ex entry requances.

orms are curr/ customs pr

bably in acco

ment decree 1n and managcy situationst and Commication plansommunicatiocy situations

d radio frequoes not, hownt by interna

ance with Goting and expWithin 20 d

products for


States will hational assistas subject to t

ctor (i.e. govein Governmespecified).

Committee rer by the inteuirements th

rently being ocedures

ordance with

1442 of 2012gement of eles. According tunications is

s, including foon lines to sts and in line wencies to inc

wever, specifiational teams

overnment Dporting medic

ays before ththe purpose

Response to Manast)

ave visa requance. Other the nature oernmental / ent Decree 2

eports that grnational com

hat may appl

developed t

h the Tampe

2 sets the proectronic comto its provisis responsibleor emergencate entities dwith this rulecoming teamically discusss.

Decree No. 5cine and druhe planned ds of humanit

n-made

uirements wainternationa

of the requesnon governm

229/2008 (wi

goods and semmunity arely under norm

o facilitate b

re Conventio

ocedure for tmmunication

ons, the Mine for developcy situations.during the pe it will also p

ms, if so reques the use of I

581 of 2000 oug substancedelivery of dtarian assista

19

aived if al actors mayst and the mental ith subject of

ervices in e not liable mal

border

on.

the networks in

nistry of ping . It also takeseriod of provide ested. This CT

on the rules es into rugs and / oance the

y

f

s

r

20

Reduce barrexport, trandogs

Re-exportatsearch dogs,goods, even

Ensuring appsafety of intpersonnel, trelief consig

Provision of logistic supppersonnel, ttransport, et

Provision of commoditieelectricity, e

Develo

riers to the imsit and use o

ion of equip, vehicles) an if donated i

propriate secernational reheir equipm

gnments

administratport (office, aranslation, etc.)

subsistences (food, wat

etc.)

oped by EU-fundean

mport / of search

ment (incl. nd unused s permitted

curity and elief ent and

ive and admin. equipment,

er, lodging,


following import pename, doand quanunder WHof registrathe produalso requcertificatethen be islaborator

In additioprovided medicatiocorresponprovisions

Yes.

Documenoffer. All vborder cravailabilitmicrochip

Yes

Security isrelief team

Administrtechnical available

Armenia edays, espeINSARAG be require


documentatermit applicaosage, drug fo

tity) plus anyHO’s internatation in the cuced companired to subme to import dssued by thery tests basis

on, Governmas humanita

ons. It wouldnding rules, es of the abov

nts of SAR doveterinary inossing pointty of pet pasps, no furthe

s assumed bms shall ensu

rative / office/ ICT supporfree of charg

expects disaecially in terguidelines. Ied from an e


tion shall beation (incl. trorm, producy of the follotional systemcountry of ony. If the dru

mit standard drugs and / o Ministry of .

ent Decree Narian aid als

d be of benefiespecially as ve mentioned

ogs shall be pnspections ars, by the Minsport or offic

er entry requ

oth by the hure safety on

er support, irt as well as ge.

ster relief tems of lodginIt is acknowlearlier onset

Response to Manast)

submitted tademark namer, country o

owing certificm of quality crigin, or qua

ug is not regisdocuments f

or medical prHealth on do

No. 66 of 200o regulates t

fit to receive fregards how

d decree.

provided upore then arrannistry of Agricial veterinarirements sha

ost and sendn site of ope

nterpretatioinland transp

ams to be seg and food sedged, howe.

n-made

to the Ministme of drug, of origin, expcates: a certicertification,lity certificatstered in Armfor quality coroducts to Aocumentary

03 on the gothe import ofurther infor

w they corres

on acceptancnged to be ciculture. In cry certificateall be compl

ding nation. rations.

on and eventport and fue

elf-sufficientsupplies, in liever, water s

try of Healthgeneric

piration dateificate issued, certificate te issued by menia, it is ontrol. The rmenia will and / or

oods of rmation on spond to the

ce of the arried out at

case of e and ied with.

Incoming

ually l are

for 7-10 ine with the supplies may

:

e d

t

y

Provision of

LEGAL AND

Recognize pqualificationinternationa

Recognize thpersonnel ofactors

Consider issdamage cau

Develo

medical sup

FINANCIAL I

rofessional ns and certifial relief perso

he legal statuf assisting in

ues of liabilitsed by relief

oped by EU-fundean

pport

ISSUES

cates of onnel

us of ternational

ty for f personnel


On the abDistributiSituation,

Yes, no in

Yes, with

On the ot“classifiedfirst is conprocessesother hanto prevenNGOs andmay be ree.g. in casstated by scrutiny p

Mostly bi

Other asp

The compof circuminternatiomalpractithe criminbrought awith on ca


bove basis alon channels , local manag

nformation w

no certificat

ther hand it md” (INSARAGnsidered pers in place andnd, as Armennt unwanted d other interequired addise of medica the Ministry

process is arr

lateral agree

pects may be

plexity of thisstances that

onal laws maice are national one, so itagainst internase-by-case


l commoditiare arrange

gement auth

whether free

tion procedu

must be noteG, EU moduler se as compd therefore a

nia has curreinternationa

rnational actotional proof l interventioy of Health. Aranged.)

ements settle

e covered by

s issue is nott could be apay be applicanally heard it is unlikely tnational persbasis.

Response to Manast)

es are providd by the Min

horities and p

of charge or

re

ed there is des) and “non-lying with vaadditional scntly no contral assistanceors who has of certificati

on or adminisAt this stage

e this issue

Government

t much consipplied. In cas

ble. In princn the civil cohat criminal sonnel. How

n-made

ded free of cnistry of Emeprivate comp

r against pay

distinction be-classified” t

arious qualitycrutiny is unlrol mechanis

e entering theresponded u

ion / qualificstration of d

e it is unclear

t Decree 229

idered, due tse of medicaliple, cases o

ourt system r charges wo

wever, cases a

21

charge. ergency panies.

yment

etween eams. The y assurance ikely. On thesm in place e country, unilaterally cation (for rugs, as

r how this

9/2008.

to the range l negligence,f medical rather than uld be are dealt

e

22

6.2 AzIn o

governmdiscuss tprotectioApproxim1. Minist2. Minist3. Police/4. Custom5. Minist6. Minist7. Minist

Ashowed athe conce For Azerrelevant ProgramAzerbaijanext twocooperat

6.3 Be

Though Bprovidedthe Belarthe answrelevant

In additioConseque

Overall f

From thebut certain place aprovidedinternati

Belarus rthe ques

Develo

erbaijan order to int

mental depathe HNS quon experts omately fortytry of Emergtry of Foreig/Border Polms/Ministrytry of Transptry of Healthtry of Telecoll participana real interept. rbaijan autlegislation,me will be

ani Urban So years. Thtion betwee

elarus

Belarus ansd no clarificarus authoritwers to the

information

on, Belarus ently, all inf

findings

e data studiain existing and practic

d assistanceonal exercis

rates their pstionnaire.

oped by EU-fundean

troduce the artments asuestionnaireof the Consoy representagency Situatgn Affairs ice/Ministry

y of Financeportation h ommunicatints were ve

rest in prom

thorities, ta it seems thimplement

Search and his may be en sectors.

swered the ation to theties in the g

questionnan already ac

did not speformation in

ed we assuprovisions es could be

e to Belaruses in 2009

preparedneThey repo


concept of ssociated we with relevortium attenatives from tions

y of Interiore

ion, attendeery interest

moting a po

aking into chat one of ttation of th

Rescue teathe cataly

questionnae requestediven time fraire, most ocquired dur

cify whethen this count

me that nomight pert

e verified wus, followin.

ss to receivort to have


f Host Natiowith the Mvant deleganded the Nathe followin

r

ed this meeted about tholicy or legis

consideratiothe area of e HNS concam will be yst to devel

aire, until td items. Alsrame. Thereof which anring the Prog

er it agrees try chapter

o host natiotain to the s

were in Marcng a break

ve internatioe certain l


on Support (Ministry of

ates, on 11ational Adving departm

ting chairedhe HNS conslation that

on the currf interest in cept. One fuseeking INSlop HNS an

the work wso, no interefore the benswers coulgramme.

to share theshall be tre

n support ssame effectch 2007, wh

of gasolin

onal assistaegislation

Response to Manast)

(HNS) to theEmergency

1th of April isory Group

ments:

d by PPRD Encept and tht could be d

rent procesthe 2nd Phaurther poinSARAG clas

nd create th

as submitterviews couldelow summald not be ve

e findings wated with c

system is est. The last ohen Latvia te line, as

nce an averin place, b

n-made

e various Azy Situations

one of thep meeting.

EAST team lhe level of developed t

sses of chaase of the Pnt of note isssification whe coordina

ed for first d be conduary is solely

verified and

with any stacaution.

stablished inoccasions wtogether wwell as du

rage 3.0 oubut they m

zerbaijani s, and to e EU civil

eader. questions to further

anging all PPRD East s that the within the ation and

review it cted with based on on other

akeholder.

n Belarus, when laws ith Russia

uring two

t of 5.0 in may have

experienin the in-

In principwith the relevant

Findings

The followere ide

EMERGENCY


Develo

ced proble-country coo

ple, Belarus concept oprovisions

by HNS top

owing tablentified duri

Y PLANNING


oped by EU-fundean

ms during pordination s

s reports thf host natioof bilateral

pics


G

able for assistance


past operatstructures a

hat the civilon supportagreement

es all measearch.

No direct legal and identifiedsupport:

- Law Nagainoveraprote

- Law oinstitudetailcovermana

- Law nlegal of emreferethis lacivil u

AdditionaKyrgyzstaUzbekista

The Statethe coordprovisionsand its co


tion as regaand into the

l protectiont in generalts on mutua

sures ensur

informationinstitutional

d the followin

No. 141/98 onst Natural aall organizatiection of the

on Emergencutional framling the obligrs the responagement.

no. 117/2002and instituti

mergency, as ence is madeaw seems tounrest.

ally, bilateraln, Latvia, Lit

an.

e Emergencydination systes relating to

ontent are un


ards the inte emergenc

n / disaster l; this may al disaster re

ing host na

n received onl analysis comng legal acts

on the Proteand Man-maonal and legpopulation.

cy Authoritieework of emgations of thnse and reco

2 on the Staonal framewspecial temp

e towards narather orien

l agreementhuania, Mol

y Prevention em of disasteHNS. At this

nclear.

Response to Manast)

egration of cy operation

managemederive from

elief.

ation suppo

n applicable nmpleted withthat may ha

ction of Popade Emergenal standards

es and Entitimergency ma

e different every phases

te of Emergework for the dporary legal atural and / ont to war-like

ts are in forcedova, Russia

and Eliminaer response, stage the le

n-made

f internationns.

ent sector im the appl

ort in Belar

national legihin the Prograve effect on

pulation and ncies, regulats for respons

ies, setting oanagement, wentities. This

of disaster

ency, stipuladeclaration oregime applor man-madee situations o

e with Azerba, Tajikistan,

ation System, might also hegal status of

23

nal actors

s familiar ication of

us, which

slation. The ramme host nation

Territories ting the e and

ut the with law mainly

ating the of the state icable. No e disasters; or internal

baijan, Ukraine and

m, describing have f this system

m

24




EMERGENCY



Develo




Y MANAGEM

d timely situsment


oped by EU-fundean


p analysis rces)

essment the he

MENT

uation and

e to request


The answBelarus thinternatio

CommissiMinistersresponse

Ministry foperative

Republica

Ministry fcountries assistance

This HNS interview open:

Has Belarchecked a

Not in pla

Responsib

Outstandi

How is disinto the cwith specassistance

No


wers to questhat may haveonal assistan

ion for Emer, being respoactivities

for Emergene agency

an Emergenc

for Foreign A and organize

area was intwas organiz

rus done risk against ident

ace

bility of the M

ding issues:

saster assesscoordination cial attentione.


ionnaire reve responsibilce:

rgency Situaonsible for st

ncy Situation

cy Managem

Affairs to actzations for th

troduced onlzed in Belaru

assessmenttified risks? If

Ministry of E

sment organstructures a

n to the decis

Response to Manast)

ealed the folities concern

tions, subordtrategic coor

ns, being the

ment and Res

t as first counhe provision o

y for the inteus, the follow

? Have all-timf yes, details

mergency Si

ized? How isnd the decisi

sion on any re

n-made

llowing institning incomin

dinate to therdination of

primary resp

sponse Cent

nterpart witof internatio

erviews. Givewing question

me resources on methodo

ituations

s the collecteion making p

request for in

tutions of ng

e Council of emergency

ponsible

re

h foreign onal

en that no ns remain

s been ever ology.

ed data fed processes, nternational


LOGISTICS A











Develo


AND TRANSP



es) of incomi


waived






gnments



etc.)

oped by EU-fundean


PORT

s or grant transit


rative / ments are

export, quipment


mport / of search




er, lodging,


No inform

Yes.

Yes.

No inform

No speciaprocedure

No inform

Bilateral timport / e

No; quara

Yes

Security is

Translatio

Belarus d

Lodging, wcharge.


mation

mation

al forms are ues

mation

treaties waivexport of equ

antine requir

s assumed b

on services a

oes not expe

water, food,


used to facili

ve prohibitiouipment of i

rements are

y the host na

nd inland tra

ect disaster r

fuel and ele

Response to Manast)

itate border

ns and restrincoming tea

applied.

ation.

ansport are a

relief teams t

ctricity can b

n-made

crossing / cu

ictions conceams.

available fre

to be self-su

be provided

25

ustoms

erning the

e of charge.

ufficient.

free of

26

Provision of

LEGAL AND




6.4 Ge

Georgia relevant that due to discuscould be

In principcountries

Overall f

Georgia’sdespite tstructure

The existarmed cointernatiassistancorganizedprocedur

Develo

medical sup

FINANCIAL I




eorgia

has answelegislation to the curr

ss HNS in morganized a

ple, Georgis, the Europ

findings

s host natiothe system es provide f

ting systemonflict in 20onal exerc

ce was recd togetherres are also

oped by EU-fundean

pport

ISSUES

cates of onnel

us of ternational

ty for f personnel

ered the qufor further

rent processmore depth and thus so

ia agrees topean Comm

on support fnot being

or various H

m could be 008 and thecise organizeived. In a

r with US tested


Distributiarranged

Yes, free o

Yes, with

Most pro

Belarus dinternatio

No inform

uestionnairer review. In s of legislatthan the inme questio

o share theission and t

framework conceptua

HNS areas t

tested dure earthquazed in paraddition, n

bodies, w


on channels on a case-by

of charge.

no certificat

bably not co

oes not distional actor

mation receiv

e, clarified the time o

tion changenformation ons still rema

e findings ithe Particip

is defined lized. Fundo certain ex

ring some eke in 2009 rtnership wational lev

where, thou


of all the aby-case basis,

tion procedu

onsidered.

inct the offer

ved, the resp

related queof the interve in this field

already proain open.

included inating States

by various amental lextent.

emergencieas well as

with NATOel table-tough not as

Response to Manast)

bove servicesas appropria

re

rs on the bas

ponder was u

estions andviews, howd, they werovided. The

this Studys of the Mec

legal measugal provisio

es, such as,the “Georg

O/EADRCC, p exercisess core obj

n-made

s and commoate.

sis of the nat

unaware of t

d provided wever, they re not in theerefore no

y with othechanism.

ures alreadons and ins

, most recegia 2012” la

when intes are also jective, HN

odities are

ture of

the issue

pieces of signalled, e position interview

er Partner

y in place stitutional

ently, the arge-scale ernational

regularly NS-related

While Geproblemsas the inpreparedwould stiwhat woof legisla

Additionawith the establishabout hothey also

Findings

The followere ide

EMERGENCY


Develo

eorgia repos during pa

ntegration odness to recill be intere

ould need imation change

ally, Georgiconcept of

hed on the ost nation so ratified the

by HNS top


Y PLANNING


oped by EU-fundean

orted, withoast operatioof internatioceive internesting to unmprovemene consider a

ia reports tf host nationbasis of theupport. Gee Istanbul C

pics


G

able for assistance


out any furtons as regaronal assistanational assderstand wt in their exand therefo

hat the civin support ine National Rorgia repor

Convention

es all measearch.

LegislatioNumerouwithin the

1. Law oand M

promotinand respo

2. Natio26 Au

describingauthoritiethem. Ondiplomati

3. MinisFacili


ther clarificrds internalance into thsistance an

what they thxisting systere will rectif

il protectionn general. AResponse Prts to followon tempora

ures ensuri

n specificallyus aspects of e following p

on ProtectinManmade Em

g a unified sonse.

onal Responugust 2008

g 17 functiones responsibe function isic protocol a

stry of Finanitation of cus


ation or del decision m

he emergenaverage 4 o

hink functioem, as well ify the ident

n / disasterAlso, the coPlan enablesw NATO andary admissi

ing host na

y targeting Hhost nation

pieces of legi

g the Populamergency Sit

ystem for pr

nse Plan on m

ns of emergele in each ans specifically nd internatio

nce order nr. stom declara

Response to Manast)

tail, to havmaking and ncy operatioout of 5 in tned and / oas whether

tified shortc

r managemeoperation as other sectd UN guidelon.

tion suppo

HNS does notsupport, howslation:

ation and Tetuations, of

revention, m

man-made a

ency managend the coope

dedicated toonal humani

106 as of 18ations and a

n-made

ve experienccooperatio

ons, they rathe questioor functionsr the currencomings, if a

ent sector iacross sectotors to havlines in prin

ort in Georg

t exist for thewever, are c

erritory from2007

mitigation, pre

and natural d

ement, includeration links o the provisiitarian aid.

8 February 2approval of in

27

ced some on as well ated their onnaire. It s well and nt process any.

is familiar ors that is ve an idea nciple and

gia, which

e moment. overed

m Natural

eparedness

disasters of

ding the between on of

010 on the nstructions””

28

Institutional

Develo

l, decision m

oped by EU-fundean

making,


introducin

4. Memthe fanotes

setting up

5. BilateIsraelUkrai

6. InternpledgINSAR

Though itsigned the

- AgreeCoopeemergman-

- Additnetwo

- AgreeParticand e

In additioPartner coProgrammEmergencapparentleven gap response

Equally, thon free mregions ofcase how being sen

The Crisis


ng templates

morandum ofacilitation ofs, it is not leg

p a framewo

eral disasterl, Jordan, Kazine.

national agrged to are: IsRAG Guidelin

t was not spee following a

ement amoneration (BSE

rgency assist-made disast

tional Protocork of liaison

ement on cocipating Statelimination o

on, accordingountries devme, the Regucy Situationsly addressesanalysis. It hand thus ind

he Law on thmovement ma

f Abkhazia athese restric

nt to the abov

s Manageme


s for custom

f Understandf vital cross-bgally binding

rk for host n

r relief agreezakhstan, Ru

reements / gstanbul Convnes,

ecifically repoagreements:

ng the GoverEC) Participatance and emters, signed o

col to the abn officers, sig

ooperation ates in the fieof their effec

g to the geneveloped withulation on ths may also haresponse ca

has also refedirectly to HN

he Occupieday affect incond South Osctions are cove regions.

ent Governm

Response to Manast)

s clearance o

ding betweenborder trans)

ation suppo

ements with ussian Federa

guidelines Gevention on te

orted, Georg

rnments of thting States o

mergency reson 15 April 1

bove agreemgned on 20 O

mong the Goeld of prevencts, signed on

eral analysis oin the frame

he Rules for Cave an affect

apacities, andrence to crosNS.

d Territories, oming assistsetia. The qunsidered in c

mental Comm

n-made

of incoming

n Georgia ansport (thoug

rt for NATO

Azerbaijan, ation, Turkm

eorgia has siemporary ad

gia seems to

the Black Seaon collaborasponse to na1998

ment on estabOctober 200

overnmentsntion of emen 4 July 2003

of legislationework of the Classificationt on HNS as d therefore, ss-border em

envisaging rtance in the buestion remacase of intern

mission is the

assistance.

nd NATO onh, Georgia

operations

Armenia, menistan and

gned up / dmission, UN

have also

a Economic ation in atural and

blishing a 05

of GUUAM rgencies 3

n in the

n of the it maybe,

mergencies /

restrictions breakaway ains in this national aid

e political /

N

/

administratimanagemento incomingassistance


Develo

ive and infornt structuresg internationa


oped by EU-fundean

rmation s in relation al

p analysis rces)


strategic drelevant minternatioManagem

The role oassistancerelation to

The Emerof Internadirect reliUN/OCHA

Once the Interagenwhich comappropriainformatireceipt andivided inlogistics a

The Field for direct liaison grothe field, decision m

Other autincoming Response

- Treas

- TEc

- Tin

-

This HNS questions


decision makministers. It onal assistanment Interage

of the Natione, incoming fo the Govern

rgency Manaal Affairs is thief operationA, NATO/EAD

National Resncy Operativmprises of reate on ad-hoon, coordinand distributionto four sectand finance.

Operations managemen

oup to ensurand an infor

makers and t

thorities thatinternationa

e Plan, are:

he Ministry egards the ressistance.

he Communconomic Dev

he Ministry ncoming hum

area was ints have not ye


king body in is responsiblce, based onency Operat

nal Security Cforeign aid &nmental Com

agement Dephe primary rns. It is also tDRCC and EU

sponse Planve Centre is sepresentativc basis. This

ates the inteon of internaors: operatio

Centre functnt of the intere communicrmation grouthe public.

t may have ral assistance

of Foreign Aequest for in

nications andvelopment, a

of Finance, emanitarian as

troduced onlet been answ

Response to Manast)

case of a dise also to dec

n the proposive Centre (s

Council as re& distributionmmission is st

partment (Eesponsible bhe designate

U/ERC.

is activated,set up at the es of other sCentre analyrvention andational assistons, informat

tions as the oervention. It cation in betwup to process

responsibiliti, as implied

Affairs, impleternational h

d IT Departmadvising on t

ensuring cusssistance

y for the intewered by Geo

n-made

saster, compcide on any r

sal of the Crissee further b

egards the ren of responsitill to be clar

MD) within tbody at natioed contact p

, the Crisis M headquarte

sectors inviteyzes and prod is responsibtance. Its acttion manage

on-site commhas, amongs

tween the res field inform

es in connecby the by th

ementing all humanitaria

ment of the Mthe use of ICT

stoms clearan

erviews and orgia.

29

prising of request for sis below).

equest for ibilities in rified.

the Ministry onal level to oint for

Managementers of EMD, ed as ocesses ble for the tivities are ement,

mand centrest others, a sponders on

mation to the

ction with e National

decisions asn

Ministry of T

nce for

therefore

t

e

n e

30


EMERGENCY




Develo


Y MANAGEM

d timely situsment



oped by EU-fundean

essment the he

MENT

uation and

e to request



Outstandi

Has Georgchecked a

Not consi

Needs ass

Responsiband the F

Outstandi

As there iswould be How are tand event

DependinUN/OCHA

Based on Centre, threquestinMinistry ohumanitaand EU/E

Outstandi

At this staof Foreignresponsibdistributeassistance

In princip

As regard


ding question

gia done riskagainst ident

dered

sessment is t

bility of EMDield Operatio

ding question

is no standarinteresting t

the assessmetually in the

ng on the addA forms are u

the advice ohe Crisis Manng internatioof Foreign Afarian aid, whRC.

ding question

age it is unclen Affairs. It isbilities of EMed in relatione.

al, Georgia h

ds the integra


ns:

k assessmenttified risks? If

the responsi

D, supposedlyons Centres.

n:

rd needs asseto understanent results ferequest for i

dressee of thused in princ

of the Crisis Mnagement Gonal assistancffairs to activile the EMD

n:

ear which chs also to be cD and the M

n to requestin

has expresse

ation of inter

Response to Manast)

t? Have all-tif yes, details

bility of EMD

y through th

essment metnd how assesed into the deinternational

he request; Nciple.

Managemenovernmentalce. It is then tvate the chancontacts UN

hannels are aclarified how

Ministry of Forng and coord

d preference

rnational ass

n-made

ime resources on methodo

D; done on a

he local branc

thodology is ssment is comecision makil assistance?

NATO/EADRC

nt Interagencl Commissionthe responsnnels to rece

N/OCHA, NAT

activated by w the roles an

reign Affairsdinating inte

e for bilatera

sistance with

es been ever ology.

d-hoc basis.

ches of EMD

in place, it mpleted. ing chain ?

CC,

cy Operative n decides onibility of the eive TO/EADRCC

the Ministrynd are rnational

al assistance

h the

D

y

.

LOGISTICS A






Develo

AND TRANSP



es) of incomi


waived



oped by EU-fundean

PORT

s or grant transit


rative / ments are

export, quipment



national coperatingManagemthe operalarge scalcoordinatan OSOCC

On the otwhich, in internatioare formeregulated

Yes, accor

Yes, accor

Based onchanges tspecial foteams.

Outstandi

It would bis and hoincoming

Yes.

Presumab

Reported

It is uncleapplicable


coordinationg proceduresment Interageative coordine disaster, Gtion providedC or any OSO

ther hand, thprinciple, co

onal relief teed, whether td and if the m

rding to MoU

rding to MoU

n the MoU to custom r

orms in place

ding question

be interestinow they redteams?

bly according

ly yes.

ear how this ie for aid in th


n structures, s seems to beency Operat

nation of incoGeorgia would by the inte

OCC-like struc

he Field Operould also servams. It remathe roles and

members hav

U with NATO

U with NATO

with NATOregulations. e to facilitate

n:

g to understduce admini

g to MoU wit

is regulated.he form of m

Response to Manast)

no legal frame in place. Idive Centre poming internd, however,

ernational cocture.

ration Centreve for the coains a questiod responsibilive received a

O

O

O, the MiniThe Ministr

e the border

tand what thistrative req

th NATO

What are thmedication / m

n-made

mework or adeally, the Crprovides the national aid.

rather rely oommunity in

es have liaisoommunicatioon, how theslities are cleaany task-spec

stry of Ecory of Econocrossing of

he content ofquirements /

he special promedical equ

31

ny standard risis platform for In case of a on the the form of

on groups, on with the se groups arly cific training.

onomy mademy also hasinternationa

f these forms/ burden on

ovisions ipment vis-

.

e s

al

s n

32






Provision of

LEGAL AND


Recognize thpersonnel of

Develo




gnments



etc.)

medical sup

FINANCIAL I



oped by EU-fundean

mport / of search




er, lodging,

pport

ISSUES

cates of onnel

us of ternational


à-vis “nor

Yes, thougwithout fu

Outstandi

The naturclarified.

Yes

Security is

Administrinland trasupport.

In principfor 1-3 daare specifto providewhether f

The EMD,responsib

No inform

Qualificatrepresent

Outstandi

What are

Reported

Georgia r


rmal” import

gh quarantinurther inform

ding question

re of the app

s assumed b

rative and ofansport woul

le, Georgia eays. It is also fied before Ge lodging, wafree of charg

, in close cooble for arrang

mation receiv

tions of foreitatives of the

ding question

e the applicab

ly yes, no inf

eports to ha


t of the same

ne requirememation.

n:

plicable quara

y the host na

ffice supportld also be av

expects disasexpected th

Georgia givesater and fue

ge or against

operation wiging all items

ved

ign doctors ae Ministry of

n:

ble criteria fo

formation on

ve establishe

Response to Manast)

e substances

ents are repo

antine requir

ation.

t as well as trailable, but n

ster relief teaat the needs

s clearance. Yl; it is, howevpayment.

th the Minists needed by

are checked af Health.

or medical st

n details.

ed a list of el

n-made

s?

ortedly resp

rements is st

ranslation seno technical

ams to be ses of internatiYet, it may sver, not spec

stry of Financthe internat

at entry by t

taff, if any?

ligible assist

ected,

till to be

ervices and or ITC

elf-sufficient ional teams till be able cified

ce is tional teams

the

ing actors

.

actors


6.5 Mo

Understaanswerinrelevant could be open.

In principcountries

Overall f

While it support-been conplace.

The syste2008 as requesteconsequehost nati

While Mthey ratequestionframewo

Develo


oldova

anding the ng the ques

legislation conducted

ple, Moldovs, the Europ

findings

cannot be related pro

nsidered an

em could bwell as in

ed and recence managon support

oldova did ed their prenaire. With

ork for bord

oped by EU-fundean

ty for f personnel

benefits, Mstionnaire a

for furtherwith the M

va agrees tpean Comm

said that hovisions do

d fundame

be tested du2010 and tceived. In gement fiel related pro

not report paredness

hout any fuder crossing


and this lion the listhand, Geointernatiolist is in wexists onl

Foreign dmiscondu

Moldova coand the reqr study. Du

Moldavian au

to share thission and t

host nationexist in natntal legal p

uring somethe 2009 ga

addition, ld exercise, ocedures w

to have expto receive irther detaig and stora


ist is considet all offers arorgia reportsonal actors (Q

written formay in practice

octors are guct, but supp

ooperated quest for clue to time uthorities, t

he findingsthe Particip

n support istional legislarovisions as

relatively as explosionMoldova organized

ere also ver

perienced anternational, they reas

age capacity


ered eliminatre denied (Qs to accept aQuestionnairat available f.

ranted immuposedly they

throughouarificationsconstraints

therefore so

included inating States

s conceptuaation and ps well as ins

recent emen, when inthosted thein partnersrified.

any major pal assistancsoned this y for incom

Response to Manast)

tory in the seQuestionnaire

ssistance frore 5.1). It is afor all author

unity in case retain privat

t the procas well as

s, however, ome minor q

n this Studys of the Mec

alized in Mpractices. Mstitutional s

ergencies, sternational e “Codrii 2hip with NA

problem dure an averagmark by iss

ming assista

n-made

ense that froe 5.2). On thom most typalso unclear rities involve

of professiote liability.

cess of reses providing no direct

questions st

y with othechanism.

Moldova, hoMany HNS a

structures a

such as the assistance

2011” inteATO/EADRC

ring past opge 3.5 out osues about

ance availab

33

om those note other es of whether this

ed in HNS or

onal

earch, by pieces of interview

till remain

er Partner

ost nation reas have

are also in

floods in was also

ernational CC, where

perations, of 5 in the

the legal ble in the

t

s

34

affected 2011” ccooperat

Additionawith therelevant of the gtransport

Findings

The followere ide

EMERGENCY


Develo

area. On thcould provition proced

ally, Moldoe concept o

provisions guidelines wt. In additio

by HNS top


Y PLANNING


oped by EU-fundean

he other haide an exures.

va reports tof host natof bilateral

within the on, Moldova

pics


G

able for assistance


and, the prcellent ins

that the civtion suppor agreementNATO Me

a is party to

es all measuearch.

Numeroufollowing

1. AgreeMoldimporto graSepte

being primcrossing a

2. BR

3. Laof

covering passistance

4. GR

stipulatinaid under

5. GIn


reparation fsight into

vil protectiort in generts on mutumorandum

o the Istanb

ures ensuri

us aspects of pieces of leg

ement betwedova and the

rt, expert anant aid in disember 1999,

marily applicand customs

Bilateral agreRomania, Rus

aw nr. 1491 ffered to Mo

provisions foe, including a

Government Regulation on

g the implemr point 3 abo

Government nterdepartm


for and thehost natio

on / disasterral, which al disaster of Undersul Conventi

ng host nat

host nation gislation:

een the Gove United Natind transit of saster and e

cable for UN procedures

eements witssia and Ukra

of 28 Novemoldova,

or the entry aassistance pr

Decision nr. n humanitar

menting meaove.

Decision nr. mental Comm

Response to Manast)

conductionon support

r managemalso entailsrelief and tstanding onon on temp

tion suppor

support are

ernment of tions on meahumanitariamergency si

operations a.

h Austria, Beaine

mber 2002 on

and distributrovided in co

663 of 03 Jurian aid offer

asures of the

653 of 02 Jumission for H

n-made

n of exercist and inte

ent sector is the applithe acknown vital croporary adm

rt in Moldo

covered wit

the Republicasures to spean personneituations, sig

and covering

elarus, Bulga

n humanitar

tion of humaonnection wi

une 2003 appred to Moldo

e law on hum

une 2003 on Humanitarian

se “Codrii ernational

is familiar cation of ledgment ss-border ission.

va, which

thin the

c of eed up the el and assetsgned on 17

g border

ria,

rian aid

anitarian ith disasters.

proving the ova

manitarian

the n Aid

s

.

Develooped by EU-fundeaned Programme fornd Natural Disaste

setting upensure thinformatithat are passistance

6. Gmh

regulatingbodies of assessme

7. Gemp

establishidefining ewell as seemergenc

Issues stil

Though thby the Monational lassistance

- La

- Lasi

It is still tolaws may

In additio

- AoSt

- Acote19


p the Interdehe effective don channel i

prohibited toe is also anne

Government model regula

umanitarian

g the roles athe Commis

ent and the d

Government mergency siresenting inf

ng a uniformemergency aetting informcies.

ll to be clarif

he followingoldavian autegislation the, such as:

aw no. 212 o

aw no 93 of ituations ser

o be investigy be relevant

on, Moldova

Agreement other emergetates, signed

Agreement oonsequencesechnological993


epartmental distribution on between d

o be transporexed to this

decision nr. ation of the tn aid,

nd responsibssion for Humdistribution o

decision nr. ituation classformation in

m methodoloareas and ear

ation manag

fied:

s were not shorities, the

hat may have

of 2004 on th

2007 on thervice

gated to howto HNS.

has also sign

n mutual assencies of thed on 30 May

n cooperatios of emergenl nature of th

Response to Manast)

Commissionof humanitardonors and rrted in Molddecision.

1148 of 22 Sterritorial co

bilities of themanitarian Aof aid.

1076 of 16 Nsification ann case of em

ogy to assessrly warning ogement struc

pecifically mre seem to b

e affect on in

he state of e

e civil protect

much exten

ned the

sistance in ce Member Stay 2002.

on in prevenncy situationhe CIS count

n-made

n for Humanirian aid and trecipients. A ova as huma

September 2ommissions f

e territorial (Aid in terms o

November 20nd on collect

mergency situ

s emergency of the populactures for th

mentioned anbe two morencoming inte

emergency

tion and em

nt any provisi

case of accidtates of Indep

ntion and liquns of naturaltries signed o

35

itarian Aid tothe list of goods

anitarian

2003 on for

regional) of needs

010 on ting and uations

situations, ations as e events of

nd provided pieces of rnational

mergency

ion of these

dents and pendent

uidation of l and on 22 Jan

o

s

36



Develo



oped by EU-fundean


p analysis rces)


- Athina

In relationunderstan

? w

? ifaa

The Servicwithin theand submthe imminand / or e

The Commbody to dcontact wreceived. situation

Other bodcoordinat

- Ta as

- Tadd

- Em

This HNS questions

Outstandi

Has Moldchecked a


Agreement ahe Black Sean emergency

and man-mad

n to the abovnd

which HNS ar

f any regionagreements (ctivated for

ice of Civil Pre Ministry of

mit informationent threat teliminate the

mission for Hdecide on thewith internati

Its territoriaon site and d

dies that mation of intern

he Ministry role in the cssistance an

he Specializedvising on thevices

Emergency Si

area was ints have not ye

ding question

dova done risagainst ident


mong the Goa Economic Cy assistance de disasters,

ve agreemen

reas are cove

al operation hi.e. has any oany emergen

rotection andf the Interioron to the Gothereof as we consequen

Humanitariae acceptanceional donorsal commissiodistributing a

y have an efnational assis

of Labour, Scoordinationd in needs as

ed Commissihe import of

ituations Com

troduced onlet been answ

ns:

sk assessmentified risks? If

Response to Manast)

overnments Cooperation and emerge, signed on 1

nts, it would

ered in this ag

has ever beeof these agrency?)

d Emergencyr is responsibovernment abell as for all ces of disast

an Aid is the e of internati and to distr

ons have a graid locally.

fect on the mstance are

ocial Protectand distribu

ssessment

ion of the Mmedicines, m

mmission

y for the intewered by Mol

nt? Have all-tf yes, details

n-made

of member (BSEC) on co

ency respons15 April 1998

still be intere

greement, if

en based on teements eve

y Situations ble to collectbout any emmeasures to

ters.

primarily resional aid, to ribute the goreat role in a

managemen

ction and Famution of inter

Ministry of Hemedical supp

erviews and ldova.

time resourcs on methodo

countries ofollaborationse to natural8.

esting to

f any.

these r been

(SCPES) t, compile

mergency or o prevent

sponsible maintain

oods assessing the

t and

mily, having rnational

ealth, plies and

therefore

ces been everology.

f

l

e

r


EMERGENCY


Develo


Y MANAGEM

d timely situsment

oped by EU-fundean

essment the he

MENT

uation and


The Goveclassificatemergencemergencthe basis and by tyassess thenot exist,

Situation Moldova,affected rinformatiService ofcollectingof the em

By law, inwithin matimes per

The assesprinciple, not sufficshall be re

Outstandi

The analythat the edata on lodivision of

Is there anresponsibthe decisi

The role odisaster a


ernment decition and on cy situationscy situationsof the numbpe / cause. Oe needs of efas reported

and needs a, with the terregion havinon on humaf Civil Protec

g and processmergency and

nformation oax. 30 minutr day.

ssment of av i.e. once it iient, the higequested for

ding issues:

ysis of legislaestimation ofosses is direc

of the Service

ny coordinatble for disasteion making c

of the Ministassessment p


ision nr. 107collecting ans establishes. It classifies

ber of effecteOn the otherffected indiv.

assessment isrritorial humg the primarnitarian nee

ction and Emsing informad related ope

n any emerges and progr

ailable resous clear that ther level comr further assi

ation complef damages frctly managede of Civil Prot

tion mechaner assessmen

chain?

ry of Labour,phase is still t

Response to Manast)

76 on emergend presentina uniform mthe emerge

ed populatior hand, methviduals and /

s reportedly manitarian aidry responsibids of the popergency Sitution as regar

erations.

ging disaster ress reports s

urces seems the resourcemmission foristance.

ted under throm the disasd at central ltection and E

ism in place nt? How is th

, Social proteto be clarifie

n-made

ency situationg informatiomethodologyencies by magon and territohodology on

or commun

a multi-agend commissioility to collecpulation, wh

uations concerds the over

shall be proshall follow

to follow thees at the lowr emergency

his Programmster and the level by a dedEmergency Si

between all he collected

ection and Faed.

37

on on in case of

y to assess gnitude on orial reach how to ities does

ncy task in n of the

ct hile the entrates on all situation

cessed at least 2

e “cascade” er level are

y situation

me states collection of

dicated ituations.

services data fed into

amily in the

f

f

o

38



LOGISTICS A




Develo



AND TRANSP



es) of incomi


waived

oped by EU-fundean

e to request


PORT

s or grant transit


rative / ments are


No

The Goveassistancemechanisaddition, accept intresponsibcases proone respostandard services t

The overaEmergenclevels and

As regardnational coperatingpractice tteams acc

Outstandi

Does Molofficer? Ware their r

Yes

Yes

SimplifiedAgreemenNations tpersonnecovers UNfollow thiapplied fo


ernment decie, but Moldosm in place reno single auternational able body on aoved it, this aonsible for dcoordinationo cover for t

all coordinatcy Situationsd having its m

ds the integracoordinationg procedure to appoint a cording to th

ding question

ldova have aWhat are the roles? Do the

d border crosnt between

to speed up tel and assetsN operationsis practice. Itor third-coun


ides on any eova reports tegarding howthority is de

assistance, ba case-by-casappointed auirecting the dn mechanismthe possible

ion of disasts Commissionmembers fro

ation of intern structures, is in place. Oliaison office

he INSARAG G

n:

a pool of expeconditions t

ey receive an

ssing procedthe Republicthe import, e in disaster a

s. Most probt is unclear, hntry consignm

Response to Manast)

eventual reqo have no esw this decisiosignated to sut the Goverse basis. In pthority may disaster relie

ms are in placgap in inform

er managemn, organized

om different

rnational assno legal fram

On the other er for the incGuidelines.

erts to take uto be appointny specific tra

ures are appc of Moldovaexport and trand emergenably the bilahowever, if tments. While

n-made

quest for intestablished coon is reachesubmit the rrnment appo

principle, as pnot be the s

ef operationsce in betweemation mana

ment is ensur on differentpublic autho

sistance withmework or ahand, it is a

coming inter

up the role ofted liaison ofaining to this

plied accordia and the Untransit of humncy situationteral agreem

the same proe Moldova h

ernational oordination d. In equest and oints the previous same as the s and no

en any two agement.

red by the t territorial orities.

h the ny standard functioning national

of liaison fficer? Whats end?

ng to the nited manitarian ns, which

ments also ovision is as reported

t





Ensuring appsafety of int

Develo





propriate secernational re

oped by EU-fundean

export, quipment


mport / of search


curity and elief


a general on humancustom cospecified)

Standardcrossing /outgoing further st

Adequateand SAR d

The AgreeMoldova with ICT eoperation

Medicinemonths cafrom whicand Sociaas human

Outstandi

It is uncleemergencinterventi

SAR dogs assistanceprovided concerninwith veteexaminatcommon

Yes

Security is


application nitarian assiontrols are p), providing c

forms are re/ immigratiorelief teams

tudy.)

e certificatesdogs.

ement betwand the Uni

equipment an as listed in

s and medican in principch rule derog

al Security. Thnitarian aid is

ding question

ear, however,cy medicatioion teams.

are reportede” as specifieto Moldova

ng expeditiouerinary certifi

ions cannot practice.

s assumed b


of this rule iistance provperformed inclearance for

eportedly estn and custom / consignme

are request

ween the Govited Nationss equipmentthe Agreem

al supplies wple be importgation can bhe law also ss subject to q

n:

, whether thon as part of

dly fall undeed in Law nr.

a and therefous entry appicates and inbe excluded

y the host na

Response to Manast)

n the questioided to Mold accordance

r humanitari

tablished to ms procedurents. (No for

ed in case of

vernment of grants free

t of the disasent.

with expiratioted with adee given by thstipulates thaquality contr

e above rulethe equipme

r the term “h. 1491 on hu

ore the abovely. They have case of nee before entr

ation, while

n-made

onnaire, Lawdova stipula

e with existinan aid as pri

facilitate bores for incomrms were pro

f imported m

the Republicand expeditster relief tea

on date withequate certifhe Ministry oat medicinesrol before dis

e would also ent of foreign

humanitariaumanitarian e mentionede to be acco

ed, additionary, though th

incoming fo

39

w nr. 1491 tes that

ng laws (not ority.

rder ming / ovided for

medication

c of ious entry ams in a UN

in 12 icates only, of Health s imported stribution.

apply to n

n assistance

d provisions mpanied l

his is not

reign teams

40

personnel, trelief consig



Provision of

LEGAL AND



Develo

heir equipmgnments



etc.)

medical sup

FINANCIAL I



oped by EU-fundean

ent and


er, lodging,

pport

ISSUES

cates of onnel

us of ternational


are expec

Administrinland trasupport.

In principfor 3-7 dafood, elec

Most of tarranged Emergencand bank

Yes, again

No inform

The AgreeMoldova following

- re

- U

- P

- In

- M

- Fo

- U

This Agrecrossing aother mesuccess oof bank ac


cted to ensur

rative and ofansport are a

le, Moldova ays. Yet, it cactricity and f

he above serfor through

cy Situationscards are th

nst payment

mation receiv

ement betwand the Uni categories o

epresentativ

UN experts on

ersonnel ass

nternational

Medical team

oreign milita

UN assessme

ement stipuand custom casures relatef disaster reccounts, ent


re own safet

ffice supportavailable free

expects disaan provide louel against p

rvices and coprivate com

s Service. In che accepted p

.

ved; the resp

ween the Govited Nationsof assisting p

ves of the UN

n mission

sisting refuge

SAR teams

ms

ary, civil defe

nt and coord

lates some pclearance pred to personlief missionstering into co

Response to Manast)

y measure fo

t as well as tre of charge, b

aster relief tedging and w

payment.

ommodities apanies by th

case of contrpayment me

onder was u

vernment of mentioned

personnel in a

N

ees and disp

ence and civi

dination team

provisions onocedures, bual status, wh(such as for

ontract witho

n-made

or their oper

ranslation sebut no techn

eams to be swater free of

are providedhe Civil Proteracts for valuethods.

unaware of th

the Republicabove recoga UN operat

laced people

il protection

m

n expeditiousut does not phich may affer e.g. VAT staout address,

rations.

ervices and nical or ITC

self-sufficientcharge,

d or ection and ue, the cash

his issue.

c of gnizes the ion:

e

teams

s border provide for ect the

atus, opening etc.). The

t

g


6.6 Uk

The infoprovidedcertain eit impossopen at t

In principcountries

Overall f

Though Ulaws seeassistancfunctioniassistancJune 200Europeanalso addr

In the serelated pexact exp

Develo


kraine

rmation red in responsextent. In adsible to orgathis point.

ple, Ukrains, the Europ

findings

Ukraine doeem to covece. On the ing of the ce in the for08 for then Civil Proteressed the i

lf-assessmepreparedneplanation. I

oped by EU-fundean

ty for f personnel

eceived fromse to the reddition, the anize interv

e agrees topean Comm

es not haveer the mos

other handexisting p

rm of in-kin floods affection Mecissues of inc

ent exercisess an averan addition,


Agreemenjurisdictiopersonne

In additioRepublic oof humanentities thapplicableexcept fo

No inform

m Ukraine equest for c

civil unrestviews in Kiev

o share theission and t

a specific ht importand, in recen

provisions bnd assets anfecting six hanism orgcoming fore

e included inge 4 pointsUkraine do


nt also expreon or any priel on the basi

on, Law nr. 1of Moldova,

nitarian aid”,hat provide he. But still, wr the border

mation receiv

in the queclarificationt and the pov. Therefore

e findings ithe Particip

host nation nt aspects ant years nobe verified nd teams w

regions, wganized by teign aid.

n the onlines out of 5, woes not repo


esses explicitvilege is granis of this Agr

491 on hum, in its gener these being

humanitarianwithout provir crossing and

ved; the resp

estionnaire n cleared tholitical situa

e, a significa

included in ating States

support syaffecting in

ot many ocunder rea

ith special ewhile the Ithe PPRD Ea

e-questionnwhich ratingort any majo

Response to Manast)

tly that no imnted to the aeement.

anitarian asal provisions

g all foreign in assistance,sions affectid customs-re

onder was u

was limitehe outstandation duringant amount

this Studys of the Mec

stem estabncoming focasions hav

al circumstaequipment nteragencyast Program

naire Ukraing has been or problem

n-made

mmunity fromabove menti

ssistance pros, specifies thndividuals o, for which thing their legaelated provis

unaware of th

ed and theding issues g spring 20t of question

y with othechanism.

blished, its roreign disasve allowedances. Intewas last pr

y Workshopmme in Janu

ne has ratedsubstantiat encounter

41

m oned

ovided to thehe “donors r legal his law is al status, sions.

his issue.

e answers only to a

014, made ns remain

er Partner

respective ster relief

that the ernational rovided in p on the uary 2012

d its HNS-ted by no ed during

e

42

the functrelativelywhich HNexisting s

In princiconcept internatiUnderstaappropri

Findings

The followere ide

EMERGENCY


Develo

tioning of ty limited reNS area, Uksystem.

ple, Ukrainof host naonal reco

anding on vate and on

by HNS top

owing tablentified duri

Y PLANNING


oped by EU-fundean

the existingal experien

kraine consi

ne’s civil pation suppommendatioital cross-boa case-by-c

pics


G

able for assistance


g provisionsce. At this ders functio

rotection /ort, but it ons specifiorder trans

case basis.

es all measearch.

Numeroufollowing

7. Law n

being theand distri

8. CabintechnFebru

Establishicoordinat

9. BilateGeorgRussi

In additiodevelopedthat werephase. Th

- Lap


s, though itpoint, it wooning well a

/ disaster has not p

ically, excesport, which

ures ensuri

us aspects of pieces of leg

no. 1192-XIV

e primary soubution of hu

net of Ministnogenic and uary 1998

ng the permtion of activit

eral agreemgia, Hungarya, Slovakia, U

on, the analysd by the Pro

e not reportehese are the

aw on Emergrovisions on


t must be aould be benand what w

managemeledged to ept for t

h it consider

ing host na

host nation gislation:

V on Humani

urce of proviumanitarian a

ters Decree oecological s

manent centraties in conne

ents with Ary, KazakhstanUzbekistan

sis of legislatgramme, rev

ed in the que

gency Servic internationa

Response to Manast)

acknowledgneficial to uwould need

nt sector ithe applica

the NATO rs as a reco

tion suppo

support are

itarian Aid,

sions on the aid.

on the State afety an em

al level bodyection with e

menia, Azern, Lithuania,

tion in the Pavealed someestionnaire o

ces, which apal cooperatio

n-made

ged this is understand

improveme

is familiar ation of an

Memoranommendatio

ort in Ukrain

covered wit

of 22 Octob

reception, p

Commissionmergencies, o

y responsibleemergency si

baijan, BelarMoldova, Po

artner counte pieces of leor during the

pparently covon

based on what, i.e. ent in the

with the ny of the ndum of on, where

ne, which

thin the

er 1999,

processing,

n on of 16

e for the ituations.

rus, Estonia, oland,

tries gislation clarification

vers

n



Develo



oped by EU-fundean


p analysis rces)


- a

It is still tointernatio

The Statebody that(as declarit is not clin relation

The Minisexecutive2013. It isduring emreceived. Emergenc

The Permsafety anin responthe territoquestion wcoordinatassistance

Other bodcoordinat

- Tin

- Tromcl

The Law owere not

Under devProtectionCommissi


nd the Code

o clarify howonal assistan

e Emergencyt implementsred in the anlear what then to host nat

stry of Sociae agency resps an outstandmergency ope

The coordinacy Service an

manent Statend emergenc

se to emergeorial units ofwhat the restion of activite?

dies that mation of intern

he Ministry nternational

he Ukrainianoles and resp

managementlarified.

on Emergencreported abo

velopment bn. Request foion at the en


of Civil Prot

w much thesence and host

y Service alsos the state pswers to thee more speciftion support.

l Policy is theponsible for ding questionerations andation mecha

nd Ministry of

e Commissioncies is responencies. It is af the civil prosponsibilitiesties and how

y have an efnational assis

of Foreign Aassistance

n Emergencyponsibilities at coordinatio

cy Services anout may clar

by the Scientor expert ass

nd of April 20

Response to Manast)

tection

e latter wouldnation suppo

o serves as tholicy in the f

e clarificationific responsib

e primary rehumanitarian how this re

d in case foreanism, if regu

f Social Polic

n on technognsible for cooalso the platfotection syst

of this bodyw it relates to

fect on the mstance are

Affairs, to iss

y Managemeas well as itsn / comman

nd the Civil Prify the above

tific and Resesistance was014.

n-made

d affect incoort.

he central exfield of socian request). Abilities of this

esponsible cen aid as of Fesponsibility eign assistanculated, betwecy is still to b

genic and ecordinating thform for inteem. It is an o

y entail in relo incoming in

managemen

ue request f

ent Centre, os place in thed structures

Protection Coe outstandin

earch Institus sent to the

43

ming

xecutive l protection

At this point s service are

entral ebruary manifests ce is een State e clarified.

cological he activities eraction of outstanding ation to

nternational

t and

for

of which e emergency

is still to be

ode, which ng questions.

te of Civil European

.

44


EMERGENCY




Develo


Y MANAGEM

d timely situsment



oped by EU-fundean

essment the he

MENT

uation and

e to request



No specif

Situation Economiclocal exec

Outstandi

How is asresults arethe coordDevelopmauthoritie

Yes, NATO

The AdmiMinistersPermanenassistanceState Emeinternatiofor the divresponsib

The overaactivities members

As regardnational coperatingexpects thOSOCC wguidelinesManagemhowever,


ic informatio

and needs acal Developmcutive autho

ding question

ssessment dore fed into thdination mechment and Comes.

O/EADRCC fo

inistration ofs decide, on tnt State Come. In principlergency Servonal partnersvision of this

ble in which s

all strategic lis ensured b

s from differe

ds the integracoordinationg procedure shat in case o

will be establis. The OSOC

ment Centre. their exact r


on received.

assessment isment and Comrities (to be

ns:

one? It is alsoe decision mhanism betwmmerce and

orms to requ

f President othe basis of t

mmission, one, both the M

vice may be ds. It is an outs task? It is tosituation, if t

evel coordinby the Permaent public au

ation of intern structures, seems to be

of a larger scashed and funC shall then In addition, role remains

Response to Manast)

Most probab

s the responmmerce as wspecified).

o to specify hmaking chain,ween the Min

the emergen

uest internat

of Ukraine anthe recommethe request

Ministry of Fdesignated ttstanding quo clarify whichere is any d

nation of disanent State C

uthorities.

rnational assno legal framin place. On

ale internationction accordreport to theliaison office unclear and

n-made

bly not in pla

sibility of thewell as other

how the asse, especially anistry of Econncy managem

ional assista

nd the Cabinendation frot for internatForeign Affairo submit the

uestion what ch authority difference.

aster manageCommission,

sistance withmework or an the other honal relief opding to the Ie Emergencyers may also

d most proba

ace.

e Ministry of central and

essment as regards nomical ment

nce

et of om the tional rs and the e request forthe basis is is

ement having its

h the ny standard and, Ukraineperation an NSARAG y o be used; ably they do

f

r

e

LOGISTICS A






Develo

AND TRANSP



es) of incomi


waived



oped by EU-fundean

PORT

s or grant transit


rative / ments are

export, quipment



not under

Yes.

EU citizenUkraine. FassistanceGuard Ser

Yes. No fu

In principborder croutgoing

Accordinghumanitaradiologicsimplified

The StateMinistry oinformaticurrent le

In case ofInformatiinternatio

No specifconsidere

The Minisapprovinghow mucforms par


rgo any spec

ns and citizenFor team mee was approvrvice on dire

urther detail

le, no standaossing / immrelief teams

g to the Law arian aid are cal and envird customs cle

e Committee of Infrastructon and comm

egislation res

f need, the Son Protectio

onal relief te

fic informatioed.

stry of Healthg any offer ch time the drt of an incom


cific training

ns of PPRD Eembers of anved, visa wil

ect decree of

s (legal base

ard forms armigration / cu

/ consignme

on Humanitsubject to sa

ronmental chearance proc

for televisioture are respmunication tstricts the us

tate Service on can issue eams, if nece

on received,

hcare may bontaining emecision wouming disaste

Response to Manast)

before under

ast countriesny other counl be issued bthe Governm

, explanation

e introducedustoms proceents.

arian Aid, asanitary, veteheck-ups, frecedures are c

on and radio ponsible for ttechnology. Ie of foreign

of Special Coextra radio fssary.

most probab

e involved inmergency meld take, esper relief team

n-made

rtaking this r

s travel withntry, from w

by the Nationment.

n, etc.) recei

d so far to faedures for in

ssets importeerinary, phytoee of charge,completed.

broadcastingthe public usIt is unclear,ICT technolo

ommunicatiofrequencies f

bly the issue

n the processedication. It ecially if the

m.

45

role.

hout visa to which offerednal Border

ved.

cilitate ncoming /

ed as o-sanitary, before

g and the se of whether

ogy.

on and for

e is not

s of is unclear medication

d

46






Provision of

LEGAL AND




Develo




gnments



etc.)

medical sup

FINANCIAL I




oped by EU-fundean

mport / of search




er, lodging,

pport

ISSUES

cates of onnel

us of ternational

ty for f personnel


All foreigncertificateentering acrossing. which, upcrossing p

Yes

Security isare expecduration o

Administrtranslatio

In principfor 3-7 daelectricitycommodi

Yes, but mwhether tcan be se

Yes, with

Is this an

The issue

Bilateral a

The host professioexcept fo


n SAR dogs se. Special quare only subj In addition,

pon exiting thpersonnel.

s assumed bcted to have of their oper

rative and ofon services an

le, Ukraine eays. Yet, it cay and fuel. Mities / service

medical insurthe cost of trttled also at

no additiona

established p

is most prob

agreements

nation undenal conduct r acts of gros


shall be equiparantine reqject to quickspecial form

he countries

y the host namedical insu

ration in Ukr

ffice supportnd inland tra

expects disasan provide lo

Modalities fores are still to

rance coverareatments haa later stage

al certificatio

practice or c

bably not co

usually cove

rtakes to covor misconduss negligence

Response to Manast)

pped with inquirements a

veterinary cms have to be

shall be sub

ation, while urance coveraine

t, including ICansport are a

ster relief teadging, food,

r the provisiobe clarified,

age is requesas yet to be ae.

on procedure

covered by le

nsidered.

r the issues

ver for the duct of the fore or for dam

n-made

nternational vare not appliechecks at boe filled for ea

bmitted to bo

incoming forage for the

CT support, aavailable free

ams to be se water as we

on of all thes if available.

sted. It is uncadvanced or

e.

egislation?

of liability.

amage causereign relief p

mage caused

veterinary ed, the dogsrder ach dog, order

reign teams entire

as well as e of charge.

elf-sufficient ell as e

clear medical bills

ed by personnel, deliberately.

s

.

Develooped by EU-fundeaned Programme fornd Natural Disaste



Response to Manast)

n-made

47

48

7 GE

The reseissues of of emergtheir abil

The follofurther im

In the na

Researchplans do comprehclearly damongst countries

Yet, all Pwhich sethe interdisastersonce the

The Partnthe follow

Leam

Itas

TPloAn

Develo

ENERAL CO

arch and thhost nation

gency operality to receiv

owing conclmprovemen

ational cont

h of previouexist in mo

hensive. In defined and various orgs is not obv

Partner couerves as a gr-institutions must have issues of h

ner countriwing areas:

essons learre sufficien

managemen

t is of outmssistance in

he value oroperly trai

ocal authoAdditionally,

ational HNS

oped by EU-fundean

ONCLUSIO

he foregoinn support. Iations incluve and hand

usions aimnt in the cur

text

us Programmost of the Pamany cased mandateganizationsious within

ntry have rood basis fal coordinae already eost nation s

es may, how

nt activitiesntly coveri

nt needs.

ost importanto the natio

of trained pined liaisonrities can , all trainingS trainers sh


ONS

ng analysis ht is hoped t

uding interndle such ass

to highlighrrent system

me activitieartner Couns roles and

es may ove within thethe current

rules and prfor any furtation structuestablished support are

wever, wish

s should focng the spe

ance to cononal coordi

personnel in officers tosort out

g opportunihould be co


have had ththat the Parnational asssistance.

ht all the pms.

es has showntries. On td responsiberlap. Equa countries otly existing

ractices in her progresures that arcooperatio

e to be cons

h to reflect

cus on whetecificities o

sider the mnation struc

n the field o act as link

many opities that pr

onsidered as


he potentiartner countsistance on

oints that m

wn that disahe other ha

bilities of inally, the fror for exterlegal and st

place that ss in this fiere to set-up

on links, whsidered as a

more and e

ther the indof a comp

modalities ofctures.

of host na between t

perationalrovide HNSs priority.

Response to Manast)

al to raise aries now agtheir territ

may need t

aster / emerand, they apndividual orramework frnal supportructural ar

pertain to held. Equallyp for the mahich may p

wider conc

eventually t

dividual, i.e. plex disaste

f how to int

ation suppohe internatproblems -related ed

n-made

awareness agree that thtory depen

to be consi

rgency manppear not trganizationfor mutua

rt from neigrrangement

host nationy, in many ianagementrove usefu

cept.

to further d

sector-speer scenario

tegrate inte

ort is indistional teambefore thucation to

about the he success d also on

dered for

nagement to be very s are not l support ghbouring s.

n support, nstances,

t of major l practice

develop in

cific rules o and its

ernational

pensable. s and the ey arise. would-be

In the reg

Despite tmanagemneighbouof civil pon paperthe disassystemat

It must potentialPartner can operavaluable develope

- ASt

- Asi

- ACna

- Ao

- Agof

In additionation su

Develo

gional cont

the cross-bment woulduring countrotection br and they mster has alrtic, with no

be acknowl to replacecountries mative than a

starting ped, if deems

greement ontates of Inde

greement ontuations of n

greement amooperation (atural and m

dditional Pron 20 Octobe

greement onf prevention

on, the orgaupport may

oped by EU-fundean

text

order natud require eries; there

between themay be actready occufocus on jo

wledged th insufficient

may wish to a political point. The vs necessary

n mutual assependent Sta

n cooperationatural and t

mong the Go(BSEC) on co

man-made dis

otocol to ther 2005

n cooperatio of emergen

anization ofprove to be


re of manyefficiently fuseem to bee Partner Civated only rred. Inform

oint prepara

at internatt national lerenew the

point of vieviability of , in view of

sistance in caates, signed o

on in preventtechnologica

overnments ollaboration isasters, sign

e above agre

on among thecies and elim

f regional ee of absolut


y prevailing unctioning e only a fewCountries. Iny in case of mation shaation.

tional arranegislation a existing co

ew. The foltheir prova more fun

ase of accideon 30 May 2

tion and liqual nature of t

of member cn emergencyed on 15 Ap

ement on es

e Governmemination of t

exercises ante added-va


disaster tyregional co

w establishen addition, an imminenring tends

ngements ind practice

onnections lowing agreisions shou

nctional regi

ents and othe002.

idation of cohe CIS count

countries of ty assistance ril 1998.

stablishing a

nts of GUUAtheir effects,

nd joint traialue.

Response to Manast)

ypes and thooperation, ed cooperatthese exist nt emergento be more

in the fields. In this resand consideeements muld be verifional coope

er emergenc

onsequencestries signed o

the Black Seaand emerge

network of l

AM Participatsigned on 4

nings targe

n-made

hat effective especially tion links int predominancy situatioe spontane

d of HNS spect, thereer them rat

may prove tofied and b

eration.

cies of the M

s of emergenon 22 Jan 19

a Economic ency respons

liaison office

ting States in July 2003

eting specifi

49

e disaster between

n the field antly only n or once

eous than

have the efore, the ther from o be of a e further

ember

ncy 93

e to

ers, signed

n the field

cally host

508 Thi

ela

con

cor

Leg

2 2 2 2

ANN

EX I

–

is ta

ble

sum

ma

abor

atio

n of

the

ntai

ns o

nly

the

rres

pond

s to

the

gend

for t

he b

elow

s

1 =

noY

= ye

0=

noB

= bi

CP =

yHN

=

€ =

ye

2.

Prio

r exp

e2.

1 H

as y

our c

inte

rnat

ion

2.3

Have

you

o(H

NS)

– re

2.5

Base

d on

pin

tern

atio

n•

Le

QU

ESTI

ON

NA

arize

s th

e an

swe

e St

udy,

the

refo

e m

ultip

le-c

hoic

e nu

mbe

rs c

onta

sum

mar

y ta

ble:

ot a

t all

/ poo

r es o

answ

er

ilate

ral

yes,

with

add

ition

aho

st n

atio

n es

, aga

inst

pay

men

erie

nce

in re

ques

tco

untr

y be

en a

ffena

l disa

ster

ass

istor

gani

zed

rece

ntl

late

d pr

oced

ures

pa

st e

xper

ienc

e(s

nal a

ssist

ance

? eg

al

AIRE

SU

MM

AR

ers

the

Part

ner

ore

this

tabl

e sh

ce q

uest

ions

; th

aine

d in

the

orig

2 =

not r

eally

/ N

= n

oP

= pa

rtia

llyM

= m

ultil

ater

al c

ertif

icat

ion

proc

eAN

= st

ate

send

t

ting

and

rece

ivin

gec

ted

by a

nat

ural

tanc

e w

as re

ques

ty

and

natio

nal /

iw

ere

also

test

ed),

how

do

you

ratRY

r co

untr

ies

gave

hall

alw

ays

be r

hose

req

uirin

g gi

nal q

uest

ionn

a

insu

ffici

ent

al edur

e in

pla

cedi

ng a

ssist

ance

g in

tern

atio

nal a

sl /

tech

nolo

gica

l dte

d an

d pr

ovid

ednt

erna

tiona

l exe

r /

verif

ied?

te

the

… p

repa

red

Civi

l Pro

tect

ion

Coop

er

e in

the

que

stio

read

tog

ethe

r w

desc

riptiv

e an

sire

.

3 =

enou

gh /

suffi

cN

K =

Do n

ot k

now

NA

= no

t app

licab

lN

P =

no p

refe

renc

0P =

no

prov

ision

iH&

A =

both

the

ho1/

3 =

1-3

days

ssis

tanc

e di

sast

er in

the

last

? rcise

whe

re h

ost n

dnes

s of y

our c

ounra

tion

for t

he C

andi

date

onna

ire.

Som

e d

with

the

cou

ntry

swer

s ar

e on

ly

cien

t 4

= w

ell /

U =

unc

ee e in

pla

ce

ost n

atio

n an

d th

e a

3/7

= 3-

7

t 10

year

s whe

re

natio

n su

ppor

t

ntry

to re

ceiv

e

e Co

untr

ies a

nd P

oten

tia

data

pre

sent

ed

y re

port

s in

Ch

incl

uded

in

th

/ goo

d5

= p

rtai

nN

C =

IV =

assis

ting

natio

n7

days

>7 =

Armenia

Azerbaijan

N

0

Y 0

3 0al

Can

dida

tes –

Ana

lytic

a

wer

e cl

arifi

ed

apte

r 6.

Ple

ase

he c

ount

ry r

epo

perf

ectly

/ ex

celle

n=

not c

onsid

ered

inva

luab

le a

nsw

er

= m

ore

than

7 d

ays

Azerbaijan

Belarus

Georgia

Y Y

Y N

3 4al

Stu

dy o

n Ho

st N

atio

n

/ re

vise

d du

rinno

te t

hat

this

orts

. Th

e nu

mb

t Georgia

Moldova

Y Y

N

Y

4 3

Supp

ort

g th

e ta

ble

berin

g

Ukraine Y Y 4

2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

• Ad

• O

p•

Lo2.

7 Du

ring

pas

• in

t•

co•

co•

th•

th•

th•

th eq•

th re3.

Kn

owle

dg3.

1 Is

you

r org

3.2

Is th

ere

an3.

3

Does

you

r 3.

4 If

you

have

B.

Is

D.

Ha3.

5 If

you

have

pert

aini

ng3.

6 Ha

s you

r cgu

idel

ines

A.

IDdm

inist

rativ

e pe

ratio

nal

ogist

ical

st

ope

ratio

ns (i

.e.

tern

al d

ecisi

on m

oope

ratio

n ac

ross

om

mon

situ

atio

nae

inte

grat

ion

of in

e in

tegr

atio

n of

ine

qual

ity o

f inc

ome

inte

rope

rabi

lity

quip

men

t, la

ngua

ge

prov

ision

of s

uplie

f tea

ms?

e

abou

t the

HN

S ga

niza

tion

fam

ilia

ny o

ther

sect

or in

co

untr

y ha

ve a

he

answ

ered

“YE

S”it

lega

lly b

indi

ng?

ave

you

test

ed it

se

answ

ered

“N

O”

to th

e sa

me

effe

coun

try

signe

d up

/ rec

omm

enda

ti oRL

Gui

delin

es

real

scen

ario

s or

akin

g?

sect

ors?

al

aw

aren

ess?

nt

erna

tiona

l act

ont

erna

tiona

l act

om

ing

assis

tanc

e?y

of in

tern

atio

nal

ges,

etc

.)?

ppor

t (lo

gist

ic, a

d

conc

ept a

nd p

rac

r with

the

HNS

coyo

ur c

ount

ry th

atos

t nat

ion

supp

o”

to th

e qu

estio

n u

? since

its e

stab

lish

to th

e qu

estio

n u

ct, i

.e. H

NS?

to

/ pl

edge

d to

/on

s?

exe

rcise

s) d

id y

o

rs in

the

in-c

ount

rs in

to th

e em

erg

disa

ster

relie

f tea

min

istra

tive,

etc

.)

ctic

es a

lread

y in

pon

cept

in g

ener

al?

t is f

amili

ar w

ith t

rt fr

amew

ork

in p

unde

r poi

nt 3

.3

men

t?

unde

r 3.3

, are

the

/ alig

ned

with

any

Civi

l Pro

tect

ion

Coop

er

u ex

perie

nce

pro

ry c

oord

inat

ion

sten

cy o

pera

tions

?

ams w

ith lo

cal t

ea

) to

inco

min

g in

te

plac

e ? th

e HN

S co

ncep

t?pl

ace?

ere

natio

nal p

rovi

s

of t

he fo

llow

ing

aratio

n fo

r the

Can

dida

te

blem

s rel

ated

to

truc

ture

s?

? ms (

proc

edur

es,

erna

tiona

l disa

ste

? sions

in p

lace

agre

emen

ts /

e Co

untr

ies a

nd P

oten

tia

Armenia

Azerbaijan

4 0

4 0

3 0

N

0N

0

N

0N

0

N

0U

0

N

0

r N

0

Y 0

Y 0

Y 0

P 0

N

0Y

0

Y 0al

Can

dida

tes –

Ana

lytic

a

Azerbaijan

Belarus

Georgia

3 4

3 4

3 4

N

YN

Y

N

YU

Y

U

YU

U

N

Y

N

Y

Y Y

NK

YN

K N

NA

NN

A N

NK

N

U

Nal S

tudy

on

Host

Nat

ion

Georgia

Moldova

4 3

4 4

4 4

Y N

Y

N

Y N

Y

N

Y N

U

N

Y

N

Y N

Y Y

Y N

N

N

N

N

N

N

A N

A N

A N

A Y

N

N

U

Supp

ort

51

Ukraine 4 4 4 N

N

N 0 Y U

N

N Y N

K N

K

NK

NK

NK N

52

4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5

B.

UN

C.

EUD.

Ta

E.

Ist

F.

ThG.

N

AH.

An

4.

Requ

est f

o4.

1 Do

you

hav

4.3

Is th

ere

anev

entu

al r

4.6

If th

e au

thin

tern

atio

nop

erat

ions

serv

ices

?4.

8 Do

you

hav

4.10

If

“YES

” to

inte

rnat

ion

4.11

Do

you

hav

4.12

Do

you

hav

mul

tilat

era

5.

Inco

min

g a

5.1

Whi

ch o

f tdi

sast

er re

A.

EUB.

An

N IN

SARA

G Gu

ide

U H

ost N

atio

n Su

pm

pere

Con

vent

iota

nbul

Con

vent

ion

he re

vise

d Ky

oto

CAT

O M

oU o

n vi

tal

ny re

gion

al a

gree

mor

ass

ista

nce

ve a

stan

dard

ized

n es

tabl

ished

coo

req

uest

for i

nter

naho

rity

men

tione

d na

l ass

istan

ce) i

s s i

n yo

ur c

ount

ry,

ve a

ny st

anda

rdiz

o po

int 4

.8, i

s it a

na

l act

ors y

ou a

ddve

bila

tera

l agr

eeve

any

pre

fere

nce

al c

hann

els (

i.e. t

has

sist

ance

th

e fo

llow

ing

inte

elie

f ass

istan

ce to

U

Civ

il Pr

otec

tion

ny o

f the

Par

ticip

aelin

es –

Affe

cted

cpp

ort G

uide

lines

on

n

on te

mpo

rary

ad

Conv

entio

n (2

006

cros

s-bo

rder

tran

men

t cov

erin

g as

p

d ne

eds a

sses

sme

rdin

atio

n m

echa

nat

iona

l ass

istan

ceun

der p

oint

4.5

(ino

t the

sam

e as

t is

ther

e a

coor

din

zed

form

in p

lace

ge

nera

l for

m in

thdr

ess y

our r

eque

sem

ents

in p

lace

ad

e fo

r bila

tera

l ass

hrou

gh re

gion

al /

rnat

iona

l act

ors d

your

cou

ntry

? M

echa

nism

at

ing

Stat

es o

f theco

untr

y re

spon

sib

dmiss

ion

) on

cust

oms p

roc

nspo

rt

pect

s of H

NS

nt m

etho

dolo

gy i

nism

in p

lace

in y

oe

in c

ase

of n

eed?

i.e. t

he o

ne e

ntitl

eth

e on

e re

spon

sibna

tion

mec

hani

sm

for r

eque

stin

g as

he se

nse

that

you

st to

? dd

ress

ing

mut

ual

istan

ce o

r for

any

inte

rnat

iona

l org

do y

ou c

onsid

er e

e EU

Civ

il Pr

otec

ti

Civi

l Pro

tect

ion

Coop

er

bilit

ies

cedu

res

n pl

ace?

ou

r cou

ntry

that

c? ed

to re

ques

t and

ble

for d

irect

ing

thm

in p

lace

bet

wee

sista

nce?

u

use

it fo

r com

mu

disa

ster

relie

f ass

y as

sista

nce

rece

ivga

niza

tions

?)

ligib

le t

o pr

ovid

e

on M

echa

nism

ratio

n fo

r the

Can

dida

te

an le

ad to

an

d ac

cept

he

disa

ster

relie

f en

the

two

unic

atio

n w

ith a

ll

sista

nce?

ve

d th

roug

h

e in

tern

atio

nal

e Co

untr

ies a

nd P

oten

tia

Armenia

Azerbaijan

Y 0

N

0Y

0N

0

Y 0

Y 0

Y 0

Y 0

Y 0

Y 0

Y 0

Y 0

Y 0

NP

0

Y 0

Y 0al

Can

dida

tes –

Ana

lytic

a

Azerbaijan

Belarus

Georgia

U

YU

N

U

NY

YY

NN

Y

U

N

N

NY

Y

NA

Y

N

YN

A 0

Y Y

NK

B

Y Y

Y Yal

Stu

dy o

n Ho

st N

atio

n

Georgia

Moldova

Y N

N

N

N

N

Y

U

N

U

Y Y

N

Y

N

N

NY

N

Y N

Y N

0

NA

Y Y

B N

P N

Y Y

Y Y

Supp

ort

Ukraine

N

N

N

N

N Y N

NK Y N Y Y Y N

P Y Y

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

C.

UN

D.

NA

E.

Ot

F.

ThG.

In

tH.

Fo

I. Pr

5.2

Have

you

ato

pro

vide

5.4

If “Y

ES”

to

the

list w

il5.

6 Do

you

hav

your

cou

nt5.

8 Do

you

wa

entr

y of

pe

5.9

If “N

O”

to

5.10

Do

you

hav

inco

min

g r

5.12

Do

you

rec

pers

onne

l 5.

13

Rega

rdin

g ex

empt

th5.

15

Do y

ou h

avpr

oced

ure

5.17

Do

you

pe

5.19

Co

ncer

nin

have

nat

i oN a

genc

ies

ATO

EAP

C co

untr

ith

er b

ilate

ral p

art

hird

cou

ntrie

s te

rnat

iona

l NGO

sor

eign

nat

iona

l NG

ivat

e co

mpa

nies

al

read

y es

tabl

ishe

e yo

u in

tern

atio

na p

oint

5.2

, is t

his

l be

auto

mat

ical

lyve

any

con

trol

me

try

aive

visa

(ent

ry /

eer

sonn

el o

f app

ropo

int 5

.8, c

an is

sve

law

s or e

stab

lire

lief t

eam

s / a

ppco

gnize

pro

fess

io(e

.g. m

edic

al p

e rre

ques

ted

disa

stem

from

all

cust

ove

est

ablis

hed

for

es o

f inc

omin

g / o

rmit

re-e

xpor

tatio

g an

y as

sista

nce

ion

al la

ws /

pra

cticie

s tn

ers

s GOs

ed a

list

of i

nter

naal

disa

ster

relie

f as

list c

onsid

ered

eli

y de

nied

?

echa

nism

in p

lace

exit)

requ

irem

ents

oved

inte

rnat

iona

ued

tem

pora

ry v

ish

ed p

ract

ices

in

prov

ed in

tern

atio

nna

l qua

lific

atio

ns

rson

nel,

engi

neer

ser

relie

f goo

ds a

nom

s dut

ies,

taxe

s rm

s in

plac

e to

faut

goin

g re

lief t

eaon

of e

quip

men

t nc

ludi

ng in

form

ace

s in

plac

e w

aivi

natio

nal a

ctor

s who

ssist

ance

? im

inat

ory

in th

e s

e to

stop

unw

ante

s or a

pply

sim

plifi

l act

ors?

sa

s be

rene

wed

ipl

ace

rega

rdin

g t

nal a

ctor

s (e.

g. li

a/ l

icen

ces /

cer

tifs,

driv

ing

licen

ces

nd e

quip

men

t of i

or a

ny si

mila

r fe e

cilit

ate

bord

er c

rom

s / c

onsig

nmen

or u

nuse

d go

ods?

tion

and

com

mun

ng re

gula

tory

bar

rCivi

l Pro

tect

ion

Coop

er

o yo

u co

nsid

er a

p

sens

e th

at o

ffers

f

ed in

tern

atio

nal a

ied

visa

pro

cedu

r

n co

untr

y?

the

lega

l sta

tus o

fbi

lity,

ent

erin

g in

ficat

es o

f for

eign

ds,

etc

.)?

ncom

ing

relie

f tea

es?

ossin

g / i

mm

igra

tts

? ? ni

catio

n te

chno

lorie

rs, s

uch

as li

cenra

tion

for t

he C

andi

date

ppro

ved

/ elig

ible

from

thos

e no

t on

ssist

ance

to e

nter

es to

faci

litat

e th

e

f per

sonn

el o

f to

con

trac

t, et

c.)?

disa

ster

relie

f

ams,

do

you

ion

/ cus

tom

s

gy (I

CT),

do y

ou

nsin

g

e Co

untr

ies a

nd P

oten

tia

Armenia

Azerbaijan

Y 0

Y 0

Y 0

Y 0

Y 0

Y 0

Y 0

Y 0

n N

0

r N

0

e Y

0

NA

0

? Y

0

Y 0

Y 0

Y 0

Y 0

Y 0al

Can

dida

tes –

Ana

lytic

a

Azerbaijan

Belarus

Georgia

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

NK

Y

NA

Y

NK

Y

Y Y

NA

N0

Y

Y C

Y Y

N

Y

Y Y

NK

Yal S

tudy

on

Host

Nat

ion

Georgia

Moldova

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y N

Y N

A N

Y Y

Y Y

N

A N

A Y

Y N

CP

NK

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y Y

NSupp

ort

53

Ukraine Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N

NA N

NK 0 NK Y Y Y Y NK

54

5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

requ

irem

elim

itatio

nspo

sses

s?

5.20

Do

you

hav

dogs

bei

ng5.

22

If “N

O”

to

dogs

bei

n g5.

25

Do y

ou h

ava

requ

este

5.27

If

“NO

” to

as

par

t of t

5.30

Do

you

hav

emer

genc

y5.

32

If “N

O”

to

you

requ

e5.

35

Wou

ld th

eco

untr

y be

stru

ck b

y a

6 O

pera

tion

6.1

Do y

ou h

avin

tegr

ated

6.2

If “Y

ES”

to

6.3

If “N

O”

to

6.4

Has a

ny m

coor

dina

ti6.

6 Th

e sa

fety

6.8

Do y

ou e

xpents

to u

se a

lloca

ts o

n th

e m

ovem

en

ve p

rovi

sions

in p

g pa

rt o

f a re

ques

poin

t 5.2

0, d

o yo

g pa

rt o

f a re

ques

ve p

rovi

sions

in p

ed fo

reig

n di

sast

epo

int 5

.25,

do

yoth

e eq

uipm

ent o

fve

pro

visio

ns in

py

relie

f med

icat

iopo

int 5

.30,

do

yost

ed?

e re

leva

nt p

rovi

sioei

ng a

tran

sit c

oun

a di

sast

er?

ns ve le

gal f

ram

ewo

d w

ith th

e na

tiona

poi

nt 6

.1, i

s it a

gpo

int 6

.1, a

re th

eea

sure

(e.g

. lia

isoon

with

inte

rnat

ioy

and

secu

rity

of t

pect

disa

ster

reliete

d fr

eque

ncie

s, r

nt o

f hum

anita

ria

plac

e re

gard

ing

thte

d fo

reig

n di

sast

ou w

aive

vet

erin

arte

d in

tern

atio

nal

plac

e re

gard

ing

thr r

elie

f tea

m?

ou w

aive

any

impo

f a re

ques

ted

inte

plac

e re

gard

ing

thon

you

requ

este

d?ou

wai

ve a

ny im

po

ons i

n pl

ace

for h

ont

ry fo

r disa

ster

r

rk /

any

proc

edur

al c

oord

inat

ion

str

gene

ral f

ram

ewor

ere

esta

blish

ed fu

on o

ffice

rs, t

echn

ion

al a

ctor

s bei

ng

he in

tern

atio

nal d

ef te

ams t

o be

selre

stric

tions

on

the

an te

ams b

ecau

se

e ex

pedi

tious

ent

ter r

elie

f tea

m?

ry q

uara

ntin

e re

qdi

sast

er re

lief t

e ae

impo

rt o

f med

ic

ort r

estr

ictio

n co

ner

natio

nal d

isast

ee

entr

y of

a re

lief

?

ort r

estr

ictio

n co

n

ost n

atio

n su

ppor

elie

f ite

ms /

team

re in

pla

ce st

ipul

aru

ctur

es?

rk (G

) or d

esig

ned

nctio

ning

pra

ctic

eic

al e

quip

men

t, et

invo

lved

in th

e d

disa

ster

relie

f tea

f-suf

ficie

nt?

Civi

l Pro

tect

ion

Coop

er

e im

port

of I

CT e

q o

f the

ICT

equi

pm

try

of fo

reig

n se

ar

uire

men

ts fo

r sea

am?

catio

n as

par

t of t

ncer

ning

the

impo

r rel

ief t

eam

? f c

onsig

nmen

t con

ncer

ning

the

impo

rt a

lso b

e ap

plic

abm

s sen

t to

assis

t a

ting

how

inte

rnat

d ca

se-b

y-ca

se (C

Ces

tow

ards

this

entc

.) be

en p

ut in

pisa

ster

? m

s is t

he re

spon

sratio

n fo

r the

Can

dida

te

quip

men

t, m

ent t

hey

rch

and

resc

ue

arch

and

resc

ue

the

equi

pmen

t of

ort o

f med

icat

ion

ntai

ning

ort o

f med

icat

ion

ble

in c

ase

of y

our

noth

er c

ount

ry

tiona

l ass

istan

ce i

C)?

nd?

lace

to fa

cilit

ate

ibili

ty o

f…

e Co

untr

ies a

nd P

oten

tia

Armenia

Azerbaijan

Y 0

NA

0

fY

0

NA

0

Y 0

NA

0

r Y

0

s Y

0

CC

0N

A 0

Y

0

H&A

0Y

0al C

andi

date

s – A

naly

tica

Azerbaijan

Belarus

Georgia

N

Y

NC

N

Y Y

NA

Y

Y Y

NA

Y

Y Y

NK

Y

NA

GN

A N

0 Y

HN

HN

Yal

Stu

dy o

n Ho

st N

atio

n

Georgia

Moldova

Y Y

N

N

NA

Y Y

N

Y N

A

Y Y

N

Y N

A

Y Y

Y N

N

G N

A N

A Y

NY

Y

N

H&A

H&Y

Y

Supp

ort

Ukraine

NK N

NK 0 NK 0 0 NK

NK

NK Y &A Y

6 6 6

6.9

If “Y

ES”

to

6.10

W

ould

you

• Lo

• W

• Fo

• Fu

• Te

• Ad

• In

t•

He•

In/

• El

e•

Ot

6.14

Th

e pr

ofes

requ

este

d ac

coun

tab

poi

nt 6

.8, f

or h

owur

cou

ntry

be

able

odgi

ng

ater

oo

d ue

l ec

hnic

al /

ICT

supp

dmin

istra

tive

/ off

terp

reta

tion

ealth

care

/c

ount

ry tr

ansp

orec

tric

ity (e

.g. p

owth

er n

on-fo

od it

emss

iona

l misc

ondu

c h

as a

llege

dly

cau

ble?

w lo

ng?

e to

pro

vide

logi

st

port

fic

e su

ppor

t

rtat

ion

wer

gen

erat

ors)

m

s ct

of a

doc

tor b

ein

used

per

man

ent i

ntical

supp

ort t

o in

ng p

art o

f a fo

reig

nval

idity

of a

disa

Civi

l Pro

tect

ion

Coop

er

nter

natio

nal d

isast

gn d

isast

er re

lief t

aste

r vic

tim. W

ill hra

tion

for t

he C

andi

date

ter r

elie

f tea

ms?

team

you

he

be

held

e Co

untr

ies a

nd P

oten

tia

Armenia

Azerbaijan

>7

0

Y

0€

0€

0€

0Y*

0

Y 0

Y 0

Y*

0Y*

0

€0

Y*

0N

C 0

al C

andi

date

s – A

naly

tica

Azerbaijan

Belarus

Georgia

NA

3

Y

YY

YY

0Y

YN

K 0

NC

YY

YY

0Y

YY

0N

K 0

NK

N

al S

tudy

on

Host

Nat

ion

Georgia

Moldova

3 3/

7 3

Y Y

Y Y

0 €

Y €

0 N

Y

Y Y

Y 0

€ Y

Y 0

Y/€

0 0

N

NK

N

Supp

ort

55

Ukraine

3/7 Y Y € € Y Y Y € Y Y 0 NK

YR

56

9 AN

This tabclarificattogether Legend for

Y = yes, suppoR = reportedly

EMERGE

Legal fram

InstitutiomanagemassistancRisk asse

Standardsituation

EMERGE

Accurate

Use of ex

Coordinainternati

LOGISTIC

Waive vis

Waive cuequipmeInspectioreduced Barriers tare reducBarriers tmedical eReduce bdogs Re-exporunused g

Civil Pr

NNEX II – H

ble summaions and e

r with Chapt

r the below su

orted also by ly yes, no infor

NCY PLANNI

mework app

onal, decisionment structuce essment and

dized Needs a and needs o

NCY MANAG

e and timely s

xisting templ

ation structuonal assistan

CS AND TRAN

sa requireme

ustoms dutieent (incl. vehion and admin/ waived to the imporced to the imporequipment abarriers to th

rtation of eqgoods, even i

rotection Cooper

HNS GUID

rizes the fexplanationster 6.

ummary table

legislation / strmation on co

ING

plicable for in

n making, adures in relatio

gap analysis

assessment of the popula

GEMENT

situation and

late to reque

re in place tonce

NSPORT

ents or grant

es, taxes, tariicles) of inconistrative / d

rt / export, tr

rt / export, trare reduced he import / e

uipment (incif donated is

ration for the Can

DELINES PE

findings prs are prese

:

trategic documorresponding l

ncoming inte

dministrativeon to incomi

s (risks v. ava

methodologation

d needs asse

est internatio

o deal with i

t visas for en

ffs for donatoming teamsdocumentatio

ransit and us

ransit and us

export, transi

cl. search do permitted

ndidate Countries

ER PARTN

resented inented ther

mentslegislation

ernational as

e and informang internatio

ailable resou

gy to assess t

essment

onal assistan

ncoming

ntry, exit and

ted goods an

on requirem

se of ICT equ

se of medica

it and use of

gs, vehicles)

s and Potential C

NER COUN

n detail ureby, this t

N = not considP = partially

ssistance

ation onal

rces)

he

nce

d transit

nd

ments are

uipment

tion and

f search

and

andidates – Analy

NTRY

nder the able shall

dered EPN

Arm

enia

Azer

baija

n

Y NI

Y NI

NI NI

Y NI

Y NI

Y NI

Y NI

Y NI

Y NI

Y NI

Y NI

P NI

Y NI

Y NI

ytical Study on H

country realways be

P = establisheNI = no inform

Bela

rus

Geor

gia

P Y

P Y

NI NI

N N

NI NI

N Y

NI Y

Y Y

Y Y

NI Y

NI R

P R

N P

Y Y

ost Nation Suppo

eports. As reviewed

ed practiceation

Mol

dova

Ukr

aine

Y P

Y Y

NI NI

Y NI

Y NI

N Y

Y Y

Y Y

Y R

Y Y

Y Y

P NI

Y Y

Y Y

ort

Ensuring personneProvisionpersonneProvisionelectricitProvision

LEGAL AN

RecognizinternatiRecognizactors Consider

Civil Pr

appropriateel, their equin of administel, translation of subsisteny, etc.)

n of medical

ND FINANCIA

ze professiononal relief pe

ze the legal s

r issues of lia

rotection Cooper

e security andipment and trative and lon, equipmennce commod

support

AL ISSUES

nal qualificatersonnel tatus of pers

bility for dam

ration for the Can

d safety of inrelief consig

ogistic suppont, transport,dities (food, w

ions and cer

sonnel of ass

mage caused

ndidate Countries

nternational gnments ort (office, ad, etc.) water, lodgi

rtificates of

sisting intern

d by relief pe

s and Potential C

relief

dmin.

ng,

national

ersonnel

andidates – Analy

Arm

enia

Azer

baija

n

Y NI

Y NI

P Ni

Y NI

Y NI

P NI

N NI

ytical Study on H

Bela

rus

Geor

gia

Y Y

P P

Y P

Y NI

Y P

N R

N R

ost Nation Suppo

5

Mol

dova

Ukr

aine

Y Y

P Y

P Y

Y Y

NI R

Y N

NI P

ort

57

58

10 AN

The compeople. Wand expeus. Special th Armenia

Azerbaija

Belarus

Georgia

Moldova

Ukraine

Civil Protec

NNEX III –

pletion of tWe would lerts who m

hanks to the

an

a

ction Cooperation

ACKNOW

this Study wlike to acknade themse

e experts of

HTMDDJeDADGDMSePInSeD

n for the Candida

WLEDGEME

would not hnowledge anelves availa

f the Partne

ovhannes igran Gidac

Mkrtich UlikDepartment,Department;eyhun Isga

Department,Anna UssDepartment,Georgi CharDepartment Ministry of In

ergiu Gradirotection a

nternal Affaergiy Kravch

Department,

te Countries and

ENTS

have been pnd express

able and sha

er Countries

Yemishyanchyan - Depkyan - Dep, Karen Ba; andarli -, Ministry o

- Deputy, Ministry orkviani - Se

of Emergenternal Affanaru - Spec

and Emergeairs; henko, Seni, State Eme

Potential Candid

possible withereby our

ared their k

s; namely:

- Head ofputy Head oputy Head abasyan -

Senior Adof Emergency Head oof Emergencenior speciaency and Spairs; cialist, Operency Situati

ior Expert oergency Serv

dates – Analytical

thout the cr gratitude knowledge a

f Civil Protof Civil Prot

of OperatInstructor

dvisor Intecy Situationof Internatcy Situationalist, Emerpecial Mea

rational Divion Services

of the Internvice of Ukra

l Study on Host N

contributionto all the cand experie

tection Deptection Deptional Manof Civil P

ernational s; tional Coos;

rgency Manasures Cent

vision, Specs of the M

national Cooaine

Nation Support

n of many olleagues ence with

partment, partment, nagement Protection

Relations

operation

nagement ter of the

ialist Civil Ministry of

operation

Civil Protection and Disaster Management

www.euroeastcp.eu

Documents

STUDY on The PRoVISIon of InTeRnATIonAL ASSISTAnCe AnD ...phase1.pprdeast2.eu/assets/files/Publications/HNS Study.pdf · INSARAG MCDA MIRA MoU NATO NGO OCHA OSOCC POC PS(s) SCPES