32
Subrecipient Monitoring

Subrecipient Monitoring - Indiana University Bloomingtoncats/presentations/Presentations2015/...IU’s Subrecipient Monitoring policy applies to all subawards issued under federal

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

SubrecipientMonitoring

Agenda

Reason and Scope Important DefinitionsLife of a SubawardPre-AwardAwardPost-Award

Resources

Reason and Scope

Reason

Federal regulation 2 CFR part 200 “Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards” Subrecipient Monitoring and Management

§200.330 Subrecipient and Contractor Determinations §200.331 Requirements for Pass-through Entities §200.332 Fixed Amount Subawards

Scope

IU’s Subrecipient Monitoring policy applies to all subawards issued under federal and federal pass-through sponsored projects

However, departments are still responsible for reviewing all subrecipient invoices and other deliverables regardless of prime funding agency.

Important Definitions

Definitions

Pass-through Entity (Prime Recipient): The direct

recipient of sponsored project funds

Subrecipient: The recipient of

sponsored project funds from a Pass-through Entity

Pass-through

Entity (IU)

Prime Funding Agency

Subrecipient2

Subrecipient1

Definitions

Subaward Performance is measured

against the objectives of the federal program

Has responsibility for programmatic decision making

Does not provide goods or services for the program

Is responsible for adherence to applicable Federal compliance requirements

Is usually another higher education institution, hospital, or other non-profit organization

Contractor (Vendor)

Provides goods and services, ancillary to the Federal program, within normal business hours to many different purchasers

Normally operates in a competitive environment

Is not subject to the compliance requirements of the Federal program

Is usually a company or may be an individual

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Subaward example: Purdue – Contractor/Vendor example: Fisher Scientific, sequencing services

Life of a Subaward

Life of a Subaward Pre-Award Award Post-Award

Pre-Award (Proposal) Stage

Office of Research Administration – Grant Services

Review: Letter of commitment Statement of work Budget and justification F&A rate agreement For non-FDP Public Health Service (PHS) prime

agencies or agencies following PHS guidelines, confirm the subrecipient has a financial conflict of interest policy

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Documentation is collected by the academic department and provided to Grant Services to review

Pre-Award (Proposal) Stage

Office of Research Administration – Grant Services

Additional review: Subawards > 70% of the total award Faculty start-up companies Required audit of all federal expenditures if

subrecipient expends over $750,000 in federal funds per fiscal year

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Note: If a subrecipient normally does not complete an audit of federal funds due to not expending over $750,000 per fiscal year in federal funds and the subaward IU is offering is large and could potentially put the subrecipient over the $750,000 annual federal expenditures figure, may want to consider including subrecipient audit costs in the proposal budget if the Prime Funding Agency allows it.

Life of a Subaward Pre-Award Award Post-Award

Award Stage

Office of Research Administration – Grant Services

Once per subrecipient per Fiscal Year, the following items are completed: Review the subrecipient’s Single Audit or audited

financial statements Assess the subrecipient’s risk via a Subrecipient Risk

Analysis High-risk subrecipients complete a Subrecipient

Questionnaire

Award Stage

Office of Research Administration – Grant Services

Award Stage

Office of Research Administration – Grant Services

High-risk subrecipients: Notify ORA Grants Finance & Operations and the

Academic Department of the subaward with a high-risk subrecipient Modify the subaward agreement to include

additional supporting documentation requirements based on the subrecipient’s specific circumstances Some example reasons why a subrecipient may be

considered high risk: Foreign No Single Audit or audited financial statements Material weakness or audit finding related to grants

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Approximately 10% (30) of our subrecipients in FY 2013 were considered high-risk – most often due to their classification as a foreign entity (2/3 of the high risk designees were classified as high-risk due to foreign status - 20).

Life of a Subaward Pre-Award Award Post-Award

Post-Award Stage

FMS Accounts Payable

Receive invoice from subrecipient and verify information on the invoice is consistent with the Purchase Order (PO) Ensure expenses are coded in correct object and

sub object codes based on the PO Initiate the payment request (PREQ) document

Post-Award Stage

Academic Departments – Fiscal Officers

Review all invoices prior to approving payment to ensure compliance with the requirements of the subaward For cost reimbursable invoices:

Confirm expenses have been properly classified in major categories

Confirm expenses are reasonable, allocable, and allowable with respect to the award terms

Confirm cost share commitments are met Confirm F&A costs have been calculated correctly Confirm with PI the work is progressing in a

satisfactory manner compared to costs incurred For fixed price invoices:

Confirm the invoice identifies the deliverables/tasks being billed, award amount for each deliverable/task, and any timeline or due dates

Confirm with PI that the deliverable/task has been satisfactorily completed

Post-Award Stage

Academic Departments – Fiscal Officers

For high-risk subrecipients: Confirm all additional supporting documentation

required by the subaward has been included with the invoice prior to approving payment Examples of additional supporting documentation

may include: Detailed transaction listing Labor detail Payroll certification records Receipts

Post-Award Stage

Academic Departments – Fiscal Officers

Confirm that the payment against the invoice is posted to the correct subrecipient, account number, object code, and sub object code

Retain documentation of review An example: email correspondence regarding PI approval

that work has been completed satisfactorily compared to costs incurred on an invoice

Subrecipients on accounts that have indirect costs

First $25,000 in expenses 4074

Expenses over $25,000 4075

Expenses over $25,000 when F&A is charged on entire subcontract (TDC) 4077

Subrecipients on accounts that do NOT have indirect costs

First $25,000 in expenses 4073

Expenses over $25,000 4075

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Retain documentation: if use email correspondence for documentation, a best practice would be to include it as an attachment in the notes on the PREQ.

Post-Award Stage

Academic Departments – Fiscal Officers

If any information is missing, is incorrect, or if there is an unallowable expense included in the invoice: Place the payment request on hold or request that

AP cancel the payment request Contact the subrecipient for additional supporting

documentation or other necessary resolution Inform ORA (Caitlin Homenda – [email protected]) of

any disallowance

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Guideline: If issue will take 3-5 days to resolve, can consider placing the payment on hold. If the issue will take longer than that to resolve, should request that AP cancel the payment request.

Post-Award Stage

Academic Departments – Principal Investigators (PIs)

Review technical performance reports or other specified deliverables in a timely manner For cost reimbursable invoices, confirm that the work is

progressing in a satisfactory manner compared to costs incurred For fixed price invoices, confirm that the billed

task/deliverable has been completed and is acceptable Retain documentation of review

Post-Award Stage

Office of Research Administration – Grants Finance & Operations (GFO)

For high-risk subrecipients: Subawards ≥ $150,000 per year

Schedule meeting with fiscal officer and PI to discuss policy requirements

Sample the first subrecipient invoice to confirm additional supporting documentation is received and accuracy of the invoice

Subawards < $150,000 per year Send email to the fiscal officer and PI to discuss policy

requirements Sample the first subrecipient invoice to confirm additional

supporting documentation is received and accuracy of the invoice

GFO may select more samples throughout the project period depending on the specific circumstances of the subrecipientand department

Presenter
Presentation Notes
In FY13, there were approximately 5 high-risk subawards >= 150,000 per year that would have fallen into this category

Resources

Resources

External Resources

Federal regulation 2 CFR part 200 “Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards” http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-12-

26/pdf/2013-30465.pdf Subrecipient Monitoring and Management section

begins on page 47

Resources

Internal Resources

Office of Research Administration Website Proposal Preparation and Submission

http://researchadmin.iu.edu/GrantContract/gc-propprep/gcs_subcontract.html

Grants Finance & Operations Subrecipient Monitoring http://researchadmin.iu.edu/GrantContract/gc-

gfo/gfo_sub_monitoring.html Subrecipient Monitoring Post Award Procedure Guide

http://researchadmin.iu.edu/GrantContract/docs/gfo_docs/Subrecipient_Monitoring_Post_Award_Procedure_Guide.pdf

Indiana University Policies Website Subrecipient Monitoring Policy

http://policies.iu.edu/policies/categories/research/Sponsored-Programs-Administration/Subrecipient_Monitoring.shtml

Presenter
Presentation Notes
This presentation will be posted to the 2nd link on this slide – the GFO Subrecipient Monitoring webpage.

Resources

Resources

Resources

Questions?

Contact Information

Caitlin Homenda

Sr. Financial Compliance Analyst

Grants Finance & Operations

Office of Research Administration

Phone: 812-855-9122

Email: [email protected]