Upload
nigelo
View
1.431
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation made at IFMA World Workplace, Orlando, on Creating Environments for Successful Interaction.
Citation preview
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Creating Environments for Successful Interaction
Nigel Oseland and Alexi [email protected]
+44 207 284 5888
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Shift in our economic activity
Off-shoring and copying
Knowledge was king
Innovative Economy fueled by ideas and creativity
Interaction Collaboration Innovation
The innovative economy
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Interaction-innovation cycle
Activity between two or more people affecting each of them
Organised facts and data
Passing on of information
Mental/social process of generating new ideas
First occurrence of idea for new product or process
Successfully implementing new idea to make a radical change in thinking, product or process
Expertise acquired by experience and familiarity with information
Working together towards a common
goal
Individual
Individual
Individual
© Alexi Marmot Associates 2008
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
“Knowledge work is a highly cognitive and social activity” Heerwagen
Concentration versus Communication
Privacy is control of level of interaction:
• too much = isolation
• too little = overcrowding
Degrees of interaction
stress
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Virtual interaction & remote working
Spatiality of human interaction:
Non-verbal communication
55% non-verbal comms, 38% voice, 7% words Barber & Koney
Remote working on the increase
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Spaces for interaction
Proximity
Privacy
Legitimacy
Accessibility
Functionality
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Purpose of interaction
Share information
Make decisions
Generate ideas and solutions
Resolve (personnel) problems
Socialising
information
This is the starting pointmeeting rooms are only one solution
and the wrong starting point
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Complement to 5 AMA WorkWare tools
Helping organisations to benefit from interaction
New methods, research and guidance
What is WorkWareCONNECT?
AuditS
OS In
terv
iew
s
Wor
ksho
ps
Questionnaire
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Our new tools
AuditS
OS In
terv
iew
s
Wor
ksho
ps
Questionnaire
Quality of Interaction Zone
Visual field analysis
Space Interaction Survey
Social Network Analysis
Interaction Profile
Photosphere & Interaction Mapping
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Two year research programme
5case studies
350meeting spaces
8buildings
3,500meetings
12,700People in meetings
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Key finding #1
The higher the ratio of
meeting spaces to desks
the more meetings taking place
Ratio of meeting seats
Mee
tin
gs
pe
r p
ers
on
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Ratio of meeting spaces to desks
Meetings per person per week α meeting seats per desk
Cause or effect?
Mea
n m
eeti
ng
s p
er p
erso
n p
er w
eek
Ratio meeting seats per person
Regression analysis weighted by number of workstations
7 buildings
r = 0.64, p<0.05
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Key finding #2
On average
meeting rooms
utilised 37% of the time
Allowing for capacity reduces utilisation to 19%
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Utilisation of meeting spaces
Meeting room utilisation = 37%
Informal space utilisation = 21%
0
20
40
60
80
100
Buildings
37%
38%
47 benchmark buildings
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Meeting room calculator
Uses data from questionnaire and utilisation survey
Predicts required number and size of meeting rooms
+ quiet rooms, conference, training
AMA Meeting Room CalculatorAnalysis Sheet - rooms per 100 workstations
Number of meeting rooms per 100 workstations, 100% open-plan
Number of on-floor spaces (M x h x 100) / (5 x P) / c 14
Large (12-18 person) meeting room 1
Medium (6-12 person) meeting room 1
Small (2-6 person) meeting room 12
Quiet/1:1/focus room 2
Large conference suite and/or training room 0
Total number of meeting rooms per 100 workstations 16
Number of meeting rooms per 100 adjusted for private officesPercentage of proposed enclosed offices 30%
Large (12-18 person) meeting room 1
Medium (6-12 person) meeting room 1
Small (2-6 person) meeting room 8
Quiet/1:1/focus room 2
Large conference suite and/or training room 0
Total number of meeting rooms per 100 workstations 12
Total number of enclosed spaces per 100 workstations 42
Number of meeting rooms for populationTotal number of workstations 1,400
Large (12-18 person) meeting room 14
Medium (6-12 person) meeting room 14
Small (2-6 person) meeting room 118
Quiet/1:1/focus room 28
Large conference suite and/or training room 0
Total number of meeting rooms per population 174
Total number of enclosed spaces per population 594
© Copyright Alexi Marmot Associates 2008
AMA Meeting Room CalculatorAnalysis Sheet - rooms per 100 workstations
Number of meeting rooms per 100 workstations, 100% open-plan
Number of on-floor spaces (M x h x 100) / (5 x P) / c 14
Large (12-18 person) meeting room 1
Medium (6-12 person) meeting room 1
Small (2-6 person) meeting room 12
Quiet/1:1/focus room 2
Large conference suite and/or training room 0
Total number of meeting rooms per 100 workstations 16
Number of meeting rooms per 100 adjusted for private officesPercentage of proposed enclosed offices 30%
Large (12-18 person) meeting room 1
Medium (6-12 person) meeting room 1
Small (2-6 person) meeting room 8
Quiet/1:1/focus room 2
Large conference suite and/or training room 0
Total number of meeting rooms per 100 workstations 12
Total number of enclosed spaces per 100 workstations 42
Number of meeting rooms for populationTotal number of workstations 1,400
Large (12-18 person) meeting room 14
Medium (6-12 person) meeting room 14
Small (2-6 person) meeting room 118
Quiet/1:1/focus room 28
Large conference suite and/or training room 0
Total number of meeting rooms per population 174
Total number of enclosed spaces per population 594
© Copyright Alexi Marmot Associates 2008
AMA Meeting Room CalculatorData Input Sheet
Data from Questionnaire (self-reported)
Total average pre-arranged meetings per person per week (M): 10
Number of meetings per person per week outside the office: 1
Average length of time of meetings (h), default = 1.5 hours: 1.5
Length of core day (c), default = 6 representing 10 am to 4 pm: 6.0
Data from Space Observation Survey (observed)
Average number of people in meetings (P): 3.7
Distribution (%) of meetings by size:
1 person 2%
2 people 54%
3 people 14%
4 people 9%
5-6 people 8%
7-8 people 4%
9 people or more 9%
100%
Location of meetings:
private offices 26%
open-plan workstations & shared offices 22%
meeting rooms (planned) 42%
collaboration places (unplanned) 5%
elsewhere - restaurant, circulation space, atrium 5%
100%
Workspace utilisation (occupied + temporarily unoccupied):
average utilisation 56%
peak utilisation 65%
Data from Space Plans (measured)
Total number of workstations (open-plan, offices, shared office): 1,400
Percentage of private offices: 30%
Total number of private offices: 420
Are large conference rooms required (Y/N)? N
Are training rooms required (Y/N)? N
© Copyright Alexi Marmot Associates 2008
AMA Meeting Room CalculatorData Input Sheet
Data from Questionnaire (self-reported)
Total average pre-arranged meetings per person per week (M): 10
Number of meetings per person per week outside the office: 1
Average length of time of meetings (h), default = 1.5 hours: 1.5
Length of core day (c), default = 6 representing 10 am to 4 pm: 6.0
Data from Space Observation Survey (observed)
Average number of people in meetings (P): 3.7
Distribution (%) of meetings by size:
1 person 2%
2 people 54%
3 people 14%
4 people 9%
5-6 people 8%
7-8 people 4%
9 people or more 9%
100%
Location of meetings:
private offices 26%
open-plan workstations & shared offices 22%
meeting rooms (planned) 42%
collaboration places (unplanned) 5%
elsewhere - restaurant, circulation space, atrium 5%
100%
Workspace utilisation (occupied + temporarily unoccupied):
average utilisation 56%
peak utilisation 65%
Data from Space Plans (measured)
Total number of workstations (open-plan, offices, shared office): 1,400
Percentage of private offices: 30%
Total number of private offices: 420
Are large conference rooms required (Y/N)? N
Are training rooms required (Y/N)? N
© Copyright Alexi Marmot Associates 2008
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Key finding #3
Quality of space matters
and improves utilisation
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Quality of Interaction Zone – QuIZ
Expert walkthrough
5 categories and 30 rankings
Utilisation α QuiZ score
Accessibility and privacy key
Predict the success of existing and new spaces for interaction
r = 0.8, p<0.05
Weighted regression analysis with QuIZ Score binned in 5% increments,
84 meeting rooms
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Key finding #4
Only 20% of interactions
in meeting rooms used
any form of technology
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Technology
The conference rooms are much
nicer so lets both go there
The conference rooms are much
nicer so lets both go there
I don’t know what the AV is or
how it works
I don’t know what the AV is or
how it works
I have booked us a meeting room for an
hour
I have booked us a meeting room for an
hour
Did I need to book you a projector?
Did I need to book you a projector?
Our AV guru knows how to
connect; he’s on holiday
Our AV guru knows how to
connect; he’s on holiday
Do you have it on stick? You will
have to use our laptop
Do you have it on stick? You will
have to use our laptop
Do you have a hard
copy?
Do you have a hard
copy?
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Key finding #5
Social ties affects
team working, informal meetings
and knowledge transfer
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Social Network Analysis & Space Interaction Survey
Social capital α trust α performance
One-third of movement ends in interaction
Identify nodes of interaction
Number of ties α team work & informal meetings
Role more important than location
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Key finding #6
Space matters
but cannot alone overcome
organisational predictors
of success
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Engendering successful collaboration
Quantity
Access
Variety
Comfort
Privacy
Layout
Kit
Physical
Success
Awareness
Agenda
Participants
Timing
Structure
Action
Control
OrganisationalContributing Factors
Start time 5%
Participants 21%
Chairperson 5%
Agenda 11%
Duration 8%
Minutes 13%
Air/light quality 3%
Acoustics 3%
Location 11%
Layout 11%
Technology 11%
100% 100%
63%
37%
% Selected
Example Interaction Profiling
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Key finding #7
Much creative thought
and productive work
takes place alone …
and away from the office
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Photosphere & Interaction Mapping
Photosphere - sort 100 images
• where: creative, concentrate, meet
Images of desks and offices not selected
Map/matrix of most appropriate media for purpose of interaction
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Poor meeting spaces
Temperature control & IAQ
Daylight and blackout
Acoustics
Clumsy and inflexible furniture
Circulation space in/out
Technology and training
Cable management
Colour & inspiration
Wayfinding and labelling
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Successful meeting spaces
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Successful meeting spaces
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Meeting organisation
Purpose – agenda & participants
Arrangement – location & time
Control – timing & input
Action – minutes & follow up
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Tele-confSMS, IMS, Twitter
Facebook etcPortal/team room
Web cam
EmailTele-conf
Video-conf suiteWebinar
Fax
Breakout spaceSocial/sports areaInformal meetingCafé/restaurant
Stairwell/corridor
Meeting roomConference suite
Office/deskQuiet/huddle room
Brainstorm/war room
Tele-confSMS, IMS, Twitter
Facebook etcPortal/team room
Web cam
EmailTele-conf
Video-conf suiteWebinar
Fax
Breakout spaceSocial/sports areaInformal meetingCafé/restaurant
Stairwell/corridor
Meeting roomConference suite
Office/deskQuiet/huddle room
Brainstorm/war room
Tele-confSMS, IMS, Twitter
Facebook etcPortal/team room
Web cam
EmailTele-conf
Video-conf suiteWebinar
Fax
Breakout spaceSocial/sports areaInformal meetingCafé/restaurant
Stairwell/corridor
Meeting roomConference suite
Office/deskQuiet/huddle room
Brainstorm/war room
Tele-confSMS, IMS, Twitter
Facebook etcPortal/team room
Web cam
EmailTele-conf
Video-conf suiteWebinar
Fax
Breakout spaceSocial/sports areaInformal meetingCafé/restaurant
Stairwell/corridor
Meeting roomConference suite
Office/deskQuiet/huddle room
Brainstorm/war room
Best media for interaction
Telephone/tele-confSMS, IMS, Twitter
Facebook, bebo etcLinkedIn, ning, portal
Second life
EmailTele-conf
Video-conf suiteSkype/web-cam
WebinarLetter/fax
Breakout spaceSocial/sports areaInformal meeting60 minute roomCoffee/tea-pointCafé/restaurant
Stairwell/corridor
Meeting roomConference suite
Office/deskQuiet/huddle room
Brainstorm/war roomRestaurant
Formal - planned
Informal - impromptu
Virtual PersonalInformation
Decision
IdeasProblem
Social
© Alexi Marmot Associates 2008
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Practical output
Meeting space calculator
Streamlined specification
Intelligent booking systems
Culture and training
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
One thing
Multipurpose – windows, light control, block out
Organisational component – meeting etiquette
Creating casual environments – release pressure on meeting rooms
Promoting use of common space for meetings (plus third space)
Add “plain old” whiteboard (or smartboard)
Adaptability – furniture layout and AV
© AMA Alexi Marmot Associates 2009
Thank you
© Alexi Marmot Associates 2008
Nigel Oseland and Alexi [email protected]
+44 207 284 5888