16
Successful prevention of syphilis infection with azithromycin in both HIV-negative and HIV- positive individuals, San Francisco, 1999-2003. J. D. Klausner, 1,2 K. Steiner, 1 R. Kohn 1 1 San Francisco Dept Public Health, San Francisco, CA 2 University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.

Successful prevention of syphilis infection with azithromycin in both HIV-negative and HIV-positive individuals, San Francisco, 1999-2003. J. D. Klausner,

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Successful prevention of syphilis infection with azithromycin in both HIV-negative and HIV-positive individuals, San Francisco, 1999-2003. J. D. Klausner,

Successful prevention of syphilis infection with azithromycin in both

HIV-negative and HIV-positive individuals, San Francisco, 1999-2003.

J. D. Klausner,1,2 K. Steiner,1 R. Kohn1

1San Francisco Dept Public Health, San Francisco, CA 2University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.

Page 2: Successful prevention of syphilis infection with azithromycin in both HIV-negative and HIV-positive individuals, San Francisco, 1999-2003. J. D. Klausner,

Background: Syphilis trends in San Francisco

EARLY LATENTPRIMARY & SECONDARY

Rep

orte

d ca

ses

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

2,000

2,200

19

55

19

56

19

57

19

58

19

59

19

60

19

61

19

62

19

63

19

64

19

65

19

66

19

67

19

68

19

69

19

70

19

71

19

72

19

73

19

74

19

75

19

76

19

77

19

78

19

79

19

80

19

81

19

82

19

83

19

84

19

85

19

86

19

87

19

88

19

89

19

90

19

91

19

92

19

93

19

94

19

95

19

96

19

97

19

98

19

99

20

00

20

01

20

02

Page 3: Successful prevention of syphilis infection with azithromycin in both HIV-negative and HIV-positive individuals, San Francisco, 1999-2003. J. D. Klausner,

Background: Current syphilis epidemic in San Francisco

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

1999

Q1

1999

Q2

1999

Q3

1999

Q4

2000

Q1

2000

Q2

2000

Q3

2000

Q4

2001

Q1

2001

Q2

2001

Q3

2001

Q4

2002

Q1

2002

Q2

2002

Q3

2002

Q4

2003

Q1

2003

Q2

2003

Q3

2003

Q4

Quarter

Cases

GAY/BI MALE + TG

MALE UNK

HETERO MALE

FEMALE

Page 4: Successful prevention of syphilis infection with azithromycin in both HIV-negative and HIV-positive individuals, San Francisco, 1999-2003. J. D. Klausner,

Background:Previous studies on azithromycin and syphilis

• Hook EW, Stephens J, Ennis DM, Ann Intern Med, 1999– randomized trial of 1 gram azithromycin vs. 2.4 mu

benzathine penicillin for incubating disease– no reactive FTA-ABS at 3 months in either group

• Hook EW et al., Sex Trans Dis, 2001– RCT of azithromycin vs. benzathine penicillin for

syphilis cases– 2 grams of azithromycin as effective as benzathine

penicillin for treating disease

Page 5: Successful prevention of syphilis infection with azithromycin in both HIV-negative and HIV-positive individuals, San Francisco, 1999-2003. J. D. Klausner,

Background:Syphilis treatment in San Francisco

• Contacts: new cases versus “epi treatment”– 2.4 mu benzathine penicillin G I.M. (“bicillin”) – 100 mg doxycycline P.O. BID for 14 days– 1 gram azithromycin P.O.

• Field-delivered therapy with Azithromycin began March, 1999

Page 6: Successful prevention of syphilis infection with azithromycin in both HIV-negative and HIV-positive individuals, San Francisco, 1999-2003. J. D. Klausner,

Objective

• Compare observed success in treating incubating syphilis using azithromycin to success with other treatments in order to justify continued use of azithromycin

Page 7: Successful prevention of syphilis infection with azithromycin in both HIV-negative and HIV-positive individuals, San Francisco, 1999-2003. J. D. Klausner,

Methods:San Francisco STD Registry

• STD clinic medical record data

• Reported morbidity and reactive STS

• Interview data and field activity

• Screening data

Page 8: Successful prevention of syphilis infection with azithromycin in both HIV-negative and HIV-positive individuals, San Francisco, 1999-2003. J. D. Klausner,

Methods: Sample

• Data from 1999 through 2003

• Non-reactive RPR or VDRL with any syphilis treatment (n=3812)

• Follow-up titer between 30 and 90 days after initial titer (n=151)

Page 9: Successful prevention of syphilis infection with azithromycin in both HIV-negative and HIV-positive individuals, San Francisco, 1999-2003. J. D. Klausner,

Methods: Measurements

• Outcome: any reactive titer defines treatment failure

• Biological false positives excluded from analysis

• HIV status measured from multiple sources, including self-reported status

Page 10: Successful prevention of syphilis infection with azithromycin in both HIV-negative and HIV-positive individuals, San Francisco, 1999-2003. J. D. Klausner,

Results:All patients

confidence limitsTreated Failures Percent lower upper

TreatmentArithromycin 1G 0.5% 6.8%Doxycycline 5 0 0.0% 0.0% 52.2%Bicillin 18 1 5.6% 0.1% 27.3%(Multiple) 2 0 0.0% 0.0% 84.2%All 151 4 2.6% 0.7% 6.6%

Treatment outcome

126 3 2.4%

Page 11: Successful prevention of syphilis infection with azithromycin in both HIV-negative and HIV-positive individuals, San Francisco, 1999-2003. J. D. Klausner,

Results: By HIV Status

Treated Failures Percent Treated Failures PercentTreatmentArithromycin 1GDoxycycline 4 0 0.0% none none noneBicillin 11 1 9.1% 6 0 0.0%(Multiple) 2 0 0.0% none none noneAll 103 3 2.9% 22 0 0.0%

HIV-negative HIV-positive

0 0.0%86 2 2.3% 16

Page 12: Successful prevention of syphilis infection with azithromycin in both HIV-negative and HIV-positive individuals, San Francisco, 1999-2003. J. D. Klausner,

Conclusions

• Failure rate for azithromycin was not significantly greater than rate for bicillin

• Since no resistance to bicillin has been documented, apparent treatment failures likely indicate re-exposure

• Success in treatment did not vary between HIV-negative and HIV-positive clients

Page 13: Successful prevention of syphilis infection with azithromycin in both HIV-negative and HIV-positive individuals, San Francisco, 1999-2003. J. D. Klausner,

Limitations

• No way to distinguish treatment failure from re-exposure

• Not all exposed will develop disease• No randomization

– penicillin allergies– field versus clinic

• Small number of follow-up titers• Wide confidence limits for negative results

Page 14: Successful prevention of syphilis infection with azithromycin in both HIV-negative and HIV-positive individuals, San Francisco, 1999-2003. J. D. Klausner,

Limitations

• No power to assess temporal trends– Azithromycin epi-treatment failures:

• November 2002

• April 2003

• July 2003

– Bicillin epi-treatment failure:• April 1999

Page 15: Successful prevention of syphilis infection with azithromycin in both HIV-negative and HIV-positive individuals, San Francisco, 1999-2003. J. D. Klausner,

Further research

• Another randomized trial of azithromycin vs. bicillin– HIV-positive clients only– San Francisco & Los Angeles– Five years later than 1999 study by Hook

Page 16: Successful prevention of syphilis infection with azithromycin in both HIV-negative and HIV-positive individuals, San Francisco, 1999-2003. J. D. Klausner,

Thank you ...