Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SUGAR INDUSTRY IN INDIA:
INDIAN SUGAR MILLS ASSOCIATION, NEW DELHI
Presentation to Food Secretary on 25.10.2017
Indian sugar production: an overview
World’s 2nd largest producer at 25-26 million tons
Brazil largest at around 36 million tons
Around 5 million hectares of land under sugarcane
50 million cane farmers and their dependants
Around 700 sugar mills installed
530 or so operational
75-80% of production from Mah., UP and Karnataka
2
Domestic consumption: an overview
India is world’s largest consumer of sugar
Generally, all sugar produced is consumed domestically
Per capita consumption is low at around 19-19.5 kilo
Annual consumption estimated at 24-25 million tons
62-65% of sugar consumed directly by bulk users
(AC Nielsen report of 2007)
Only 35% consumed by households
3
Sugar Production
127
193
284
264
145
189
244
263
251244
283
251
203
251
185 185
199
219
229
213208
226 228
242
256248
245
250
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
280
Sugar Production Internal Consumption
lac tons
4
Sugar trade from & to India
-1.24-5.53
-21.38-24.03
-40.80
-6.76
-0.98-5 -3
10.82
17.67
2.660.04
11.07
17.28
49.56
1.65 2.35
26.0029.92
3.48
21.27
11.01
16.56
0.00 0.00
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
200
1-0
2
200
2-0
3
200
3-0
4
200
4-0
5
200
5-0
6
200
6-0
7
200
7-0
8
200
8-0
9
200
9-1
0
201
0-1
1
201
1-1
2
201
2-1
3
201
3-1
4
201
4-1
5
201
5-1
6
201
6-1
7
201
7-1
8
Imports Exports
lac tons
5
Sugar Production & Consumption in India
127.0
193.0
284.0264.0
145.0
189.0
244.0263.0
251.0 244.0283.0 251.0
203.0
251.0
85.0
40.0
43.0
110.0
105.0
44.0
50.0
59.066.0
93.0
75.0
91.0
77.039.0
185.0 185.0
199.0 219.0229.0
213.0208.0
226.0 228.0
242.0
256.0248.0 245.0
250.0
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
300.0
350.0
400.0
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 (P)
2017-18€
Production opening Balance Internal Consumption
lac tons
6
Government Controls
Price for sugarcane fixed by Govt. of India (FRP)
Which then becomes the minimum price for cane
5 State Govts. fix another price for cane (SAP), which then
becomes minimum price for cane in those States
Cane area reserved for each factory
Two way obligation on farmers and millers
Min. distance between two factories 15 or 25 kms
7
74.579.5 80.25 81.18 81.18
129.84
139.12145
170
210
220
230 230
255
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
FRP
Rs. per quintal
Cane Price fixed by Government of India
8
A few States still fix a higher price called SAP
107115
125 125
140
165
205
240
280 280 280 280
305
74.579.5 80.25 81.18 81.18
129.84139.12
145
170
210220
230 230
255
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
2004
-05
2005
-06
2006
-07
2007
-08
2008
-09
2009
-10
2010
-11
2011
-12
2012
-13
2013
-14
2014
-15
2015
-16
2016
-17
2017
-18
SAP of UP SMP/FRP
Rs. per quintal
9
Average domestic sugar prices
1,420 1,577
1,205 1,247
2,022
2,651 2,727
2,951
3,148
2,917
2,492
3,121
3620
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Ex-mill Sugar Price
Rs. per quintal
10
Cost of production vs. Average ex-mill prices
Rs./quintal11
All India average ex-mill price of sugar
3081 3067
2950
2790
2618
24602405
2157
2433
2583
2910
3170
3400
3450
3475 3456
3408
3597
3730
3640
3560
37213710
3689
2000
2200
2400
2600
2800
3000
3200
3400
3600
3800
4000Rs. per quintal
12
Under partial decontrolled environment
Sugar sales and sugar prices are market determined
But sugarcane price and quantity controlled
Mismatch between cane price and sugar price
13
FRP v/s average ex-mill price in last 8 years
129.84
139.12145
170
210
220
230 230
2951
2727
2951
3148
2917
2492
3121
3620
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
75
105
135
165
195
225
255
FRP Ex-Mill Price
Rs. per quintal
14
Cost of production of sugar in India is high
Making Indian sugar uncompetitive
Making Indian exports unviable
Surplus sugar in India depresses sugar prices
Resulting in massive losses to millers and cane price
arrears of farmers
15
Important policy directions for way forward…..
1. Need to rationalize sugarcane pricing policy
2. Need to ensure a vibrant ethanol sector
3. Need to plan for 2018-19 SS surplus
16
1. Rationalise sugarcane pricing policy
Currently FRP is fixed by GOI, and SAP by 5 States
No link between cane and sugar prices/revenue realisation
Cane price sometimes crosses even 90-100% of revenue realisation,
leaving nothing for other liabilities
In last 3-4 years, FRP has increased by over 50%
Sugar prices not kept pace; have even fallen in some years
FRP has become unaffordable to sugar mills
Other countries have a cane price – sugar price linkage
Cane price generally at 62 - 65% of revenue realised in those countries
17
Rangarajan Committee recommendations
Cane price to be automatically determined as per a linkage or
revenue sharing formula (RSF), at:
70% of revenue from sugar & primary by-products or
75% of revenue from sugar alone
Farmers to be guaranteed a minimum FRP as 1st instalment
If RSF is above FRP, a 2nd instalment paid at end of the season
18
Implementing RR Committee recommendations
In 2013, GOI advised States to decide on the recommendations
Maharashtra and Karnataka adopted RSF
U.P., Punjab, Haryana, Uttarakhand & Tamil Nadu continue to
fix SAP unilaterally, at much higher levels
CACP continuously recommended RSF for last 3 years
Liability of mills be restricted at RSF
But in years of low sugar prices, gap between FRP and RSF be filled
from a Price Stabilisation Fund (PSF) created by Government
CACP recommendations yet to be accepted by Government
19
Price Stabilisation Fund (PSF)
Source of funds for PSF
Cess on sugar meant for SDF subsumed
Govt. however, has powers to levy cess through a new legislation
Cess can be levied when sugar prices depressed
Consumers will still pay less than normal years
Will also ensure a more stable retail price over the years
Re.1 per kilo cess will give Govt. Rs.2500 crore annually
Equivalent to almost Rs.10 per quintal of cane price
The payment from PSF may be made directly to farmers
20
FRP for 2018-19 SS and RSF
Report/recommendations for FRP for 18-19 wd. have been
submitted by CACP in Aug-Sept 2017 (Govt. yet to accept)
Like previous years, CACP must have recommended for RSF and PSF
Request for acceptance of FRP along with RSF and PSF
RSF-PSF will ensure
One Nation - One Cane Price – for One Unified Market
A viable & globally competitive Indian sugar industry
Remunerative & timely cane price payment: nil or negligible arrears
Stable retail sugar prices over the years
21
2. Vibrant ethanol sector
At 10% blending with petrol, 303 crore litres of ethanol reqd.
In 2015-16, requirement was 266 crore litres
Supplies were 111 crore litres @4.3% blending
But fell to around 75 crore litres in 2016-17 due to the drought
EOI for ethanol supply for 17-18, invited by OMCs on 18 Oct
For 313 crore litres
Bids by 7th Nov, 2017
Procurement price for 17-18 expected to be finalised soon
With good sugarcane crushing, ethanol supplies should improve
22
Policy changes and supplies
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Policy Change Quantity Contracted (Million Litres)
Fixed Price Policy
Changed to market driven price policy
Exemption from Central Excise Duty
Changed to fixed price policy. Price not linked to crude
oil/petrol price
Excise waiver withdrawn.
Procurement Price reduced
674.1 413.9 382.2
300.6
779.3
1110.0
23
Positive policies on ethanol & withdrawal later
There has been a flip-flop on ethanol policies and pricing
Dec 2014 Cabinet decision is an important milestone
Modi Govt. decided on a fixed pricing policy for ethanol
Linked to sugar price realisation and delinked to crude oil price
July 2015, another decision to exempt ethanol from central
excise duty of 12.5%
However, these two positive decisions were suddenly reversed
Ethanol prices reduced by Rs.2-3 per litre
Excise duty waiver withdrawn in middle of contract period
Has resulted in much lower ethanol offers for 2016-17 period
24
Ethanol supply constraints
Capacity enhancement
Current capacity with sugar industry & stand alone is 225 crore litres
Out of 530 sugar mills, only 130 have capacity to produce ethanol
Need help with concessional loans to increase capacities
Movement of ethanol
Denatured fuel grade ethanol, which cannot be consumed, is Central
Govt. subject (IDR Act amended in May, 2016, to reiterate this)
Yet, States insist on State Excise permits and even levy taxes & duties
Duties of Rs.2 -3 per litre reduces realisations by 5-7%
Only Karnataka has in July, 2017 made it free and levies no taxes
Other States should follow, esp. after IDR amendment of May, 2016
25
Current year 2017-18 sugar balance sheet
Opening balance
(as on 1st Oct, 2017)
39.00
Estimated sugar production 251.00
Imports 3.00
Sugar availability during the season 293.00
Estimated sugar sales (considering 2%
growth)
250.00
Closing balance
(as on 30th Sept, 2018)
43.00
2
2626
3. Huge surplus expected in 2018-19 SS
Very good rainfall in 2017 and with reservoirs back to normal
or above average
Sugarcane planting for 2018-19 harvest excellent
Maharashtra, Karnataka and TN expected to be back to normal
UP should be better, esp. with the early high yielding variety increasing
Other States too will increase production
Experts expect surplus sugar globally too
Hence, the global prices may not be viable for Indian exports
Undisposed off surplus sugar will burden the sugar sector
Sugar prices will fall, cash flows get affected & cane price arrears
27
Export the surplus sugar or convert to ethanol
Export some of the surplus
Like in 2015-16, export quotas (MIEQ) may be fixed for each mill
And Govt. can reward them with production subsidy on cane price
Bangladesh, Sri Lanka & China markets will have to be tapped
Convert B-heavy molasses or cane juice into ethanol
20 lakh tons of sugar can be converted into 120 crore litres of ethanol
For that, the price of ethanol needs to be at 1.5 times price of sugar so
sacrificed, i.e. at least Rs.10 per litre above the current ethanol price
As also, ethanol capacities will have to be majorly augmented
28
Thank you
29