Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
“Shall I compare thee”: The neural basis of literary awareness, and its benefits to
cognition
Noreen O'Sullivan, Philip Davis, Josie Billington, Victorina Gonzalez-Diaz, Rhiannon
Corcoran*
Department of Psychological Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Health, & Society, University
of Liverpool
*Corresponding author
+44 151 795 5365
B211, 2nd Floor Block B Waterhouse Buildings,
1-5 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL, UK
Running title: literary awareness
Word count: 6,715
Literary awareness
Abstract
FMRI was used to explore the neural and cognitive basis of literary awareness: the
capacity to process and derive meanings in complex text. A 2 x 2 design was used through
which 24 participants read short sections of poetic and prosaic text during scanning that
required significant reappraisal during reading, or did not require such reappraisal. Following
this, participants rated each piece on its ‘poeticness’ and the extent to which it prompted a
reappraisal of meaning during reading, providing subjective measures of poetic recognition
and the need to reappraise meaning. The substantial shared variance between these 2
subjective measures provided a proxy measure of literary awareness, which was found to
modulate activity in regions comprising the central executive and saliency networks. We
suggest that enhanced literary awareness is related to increased flexibility of internal models
of meaning, enhanced interoceptive awareness of change, and an enhanced capacity to reason
about events. In addition, we found that the residual variance in the measure of poetic
recognition modulated right dorsal caudate activity, which may be related to tolerance of
uncertainty. These findings are consistent with evidence that relates reading to improved
mental wellbeing.
Key words: poetry, caudate, default-mode network, saliency network, central executive
network
2
Literary awareness
Reading literature is encouraged as an activity in various health and community
settings as it is believed to be of therapeutic benefit. This is particularly so for shared-reading
(SR). In the UK, SR has been found to encourage solo reading and to facilitate
improvements in mental wellbeing (e.g. Dowrick, Billington, Robinson, et al., 2012;
Longden, Davis, Billington et al. 2015). However, very little is known about why reading
might benefit wellbeing. In this study, our starting premise is that increased reading is
associated with changes in cognition that promote wellbeing. For example, increased reading
of literature may increase one’s ability to engage the cognitive mechanisms that underpin the
representation of meaning. In individuals who struggle with mental health difficulties,
meaning derivation tends to be biased by dysfunctional and rigid beliefs. The encouragement
to consider alternative and nuanced meanings through active reading of texts may generalize
to encourage more adaptive, less rigid and biased meaning derivation in everyday life; thus
facilitating mental health and wellbeing. Here, we aimed to establish the neural basis of
mechanisms that support the capacity to consider, manipulate, and derive meaning in
complex text, a capacity that we refer to as literary awareness.
1.1 A cognitive perspective of meaning derivation, and its relationship to event complexity
The term ‘situation model’ describes the internally simulated contents of an
inference(s) attributable to a set of events (Kintsch, 1988; Kintsch & Rawson, 2005). The
contents of a situation model, which might include details related to time, space, causation,
motivation, and the protagonist (Zwann & Radvansky, 1998), are updatable in attempts to
generate a holistic, and accurate, interpretation of a set of events. Taking reading as an
activity that encourages the use of situation models (see Perfetti, Landi, & Oakhill, 2005, for
an overview of reading comprehension as a skill), the complexity of the text is likely to be
one factor that will determine the inherent nature of consequent models. In a simple text
3
Literary awareness
events may be wholly understood in relation to specific actions of the protagonist who is
motivated by easily recognizable circumstances in a singular point of time and space. In
contrast, in the complex texts offered by serious literature (fiction and poetry), the meaning
behind events can be multifaceted; the motivations of a protagonist may be unclear and
multiple, embedded in convoluted circumstances that enmesh past, present, and predicted
future.
The term ‘serious’ has a long history (The Oxford Professorship of Poetry was
established for “the advancement of more serious literature both sacred and human” [Henry
Birkhead]), and is widely used by writers and literary critics to distinguish literature that
addresses important human issues, such as those concerning social and moral behavior, from,
for example, ephemeral writings (comics, popular magazines) and genre fiction (e.g.
detective novels, ‘chick lit’; Dowrick et al., 2012). In order to appreciate meaning in serious,
or complex, texts, including poetry, the immersed reader needs to be alert to changes in the
direction of meaning, and focus their attention on maintaining a less rigid, more fluid
representation that can accommodate the overtures of a metaphor, and multiple meanings
woven in unusual turns of phrase. The characteristics of the text may be one underlying
factor that contributes to the efficacy of SR groups; individuals struggling with chronic pain
reported a preference for serious literature over simple texts, as these encouraged them to
think more deeply, and such reports coincided with a reduced experience of pain during
absorption in complex texts (Billington, Humphreys, Jones, et al., 2014).
We propose that in order to understand texts of increased complexity: 1) situation
models would need to be less rigid, and more flexible to accommodate varying related
meaning threads; 2) awareness of subtle differences in meanings would need to be increased;
and 3) social reasoning skills would need to be used to a greater extent to arbitrate between
the various possibilities. To summarize these necessary processing attunements we use the
4
Literary awareness
term ‘literary awareness’. In order to test our hypothesis that complex texts affect meaning
derivation in this way, we contrasted the meaning derivation of poetic (complex) and prosaic
(less complex) pieces. This hypothesis rests within a wider rubric that increased literary
awareness, with its accompanying changes to cognition, may form a substantial component of
the mechanistic basis of the efficacy of SR groups.
1.2 A neural perspective of meaning derivation, and its relationship to complexity
FMRI has been extensively used to explore meaning derivation in reading. Meta-
analyses across studies of text comprehension reveal a network of regions including nodes of
the default mode network (DMN) - the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), dorsomedial
prefrontal cortex (dmPFC), and the anterior temporal lobe (ATL; Ferstl, Neumann, Bogler, &
von Cramon, 2008; Ferstl, Rinck, & von Cramon, 2005). While activation in PCC is thought
to reflect the extent to which a situation model has been updated, ATL is believed to store the
narrative of a situation model. The dmPFC forces attention to settle on a narrative for a
particular simulation that is heavily influenced by memory.
In addition to PCC and ATL, other regions that co-activate with the dmPFC during
language tasks include middle temporal gyrus (MTG), temporoparietal junction (TPJ) and
surrounding regions (BA39, 40), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG, BA 45/47), and ventromedial
prefrontal cortex (vmPFC, BA 11; Ferstl et al., 2008). Activation of TPJ and surrounding
areas in ventrolateral parietal is believed to indicate reflexive updating of situation models in
line with information retrieved from memory (Cabeza, Ciaramelli, Olson, & Moscovitch,
2008; Ciaramelli, Grady, & Moscovitch, 2008). Activation in inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) is
thought to maintain contextual separation between representations that are similar.
Consistent with this, IFG is active during the processing of metaphors (Eviatar & Just, 2006;
Lee & Dapretto, 2006; Rapp, Leube, Erb, et al., 2004; Shibata, Abe, Terao, & Miyamoto,
5
Literary awareness
2007; Stringaris, Medford, Giampietro, et al., 2007). Activation in ventromedial prefrontal
cortex likely reflects the motivational significance of the developing meaning (Cardinal,
Parkinson, Hall, & Everitt, 2002; Wallis, 2007).
While this extended semantic network is sufficient for simpler texts, more dynamic
and evolving texts would be likely to evoke the additional contribution of lateral anterior
prefrontal cortex (AP; BA 10). This area is thought to be involved in construing relationships
between less directly related words/meaning threads (Bunge, Wendelken, Badre, & Wagner,
2005; Green, Fugelsang, Kraemer et al., 2006; Green, Kraemer, Fugelsang, et al., 2010;
Monti, Osherson, Martinez, & Parsons, 2007; Monti, Parsons, & Osherson, 2009; Rutter,
Kröger, Stark, et al., 2012; Wendelken, Nakhabenko, Donohue, et al., 2008). Consistent with
a medial-to-lateral distinction in the role of AP in cognition, AP activation is increasingly
medial when decisions relate to encoded memories, and increasingly lateral when decisions
relate to novel representations (Baird, Smallwood, Gorgolewski, & Margulies, 2013). Areas
that become active as task difficulty increases, namely dorsolateral prefrontal (dlPFC) and
superior and posterior parietal regions that underlie the working memory network (Corbetta,
Patel, & Shulman, 2008), would also be expected to be necessary in supporting meaning
derivation from complex texts.
In relation to updating a model of meaning, we hypothesize roles for the dorsal
caudate, and the salience network (SN; Seeley, Menon, Schatzberg, et al., 2007). Activity in
the left dorsal caudate has been related to the deductive application of a rule from a set of
arguments (Melrose, Poulin, & Stern, 2007). Along with the putamen and lateral prefrontal
regions BA9 and 44, it is active across tasks that require categorical reasoning (Prado,
Chadha, & Booth, 2011). Activity in dorsal caudate during reasoning tasks may stem from
attunement to changes in an online representation. In simple reinforcement tasks, for
example, activity in the dorsal caudate increases when a behavioral choice becomes
6
Literary awareness
associated with a better outcome (Delgado, Locke, Stenger & Fiez, 2003; Knutson & Cooper,
2005; O’Doherty, Dayan, Schultz, et al., 2004; O’Sullivan, Szczepanowski, El-Deredy et al.,
2011). By extension, in reasoning tasks, caudate activity may reflect the better understanding
derived from the integration of an updated meaning into a situation model. Consistent with
this hypothesis, we previously found that activity in the left dorsal caudate was triggered by
Shakespearean functional shifts that required individuals to reason about a familiar word, and
its context, in a novel way (Keidel, Davis, Gonzalez-Diaz et al., 2013).
The SN is made up of regions connected to interoceptive awareness, including the
right fronto-insula, anterior insula, dorsal ACC/paracingulate cortex, and superior temporal
pole, but with extensions to amygdala, ventral striatopallidum, dorsomedial thalamus,
hypothalamus, pariaqueductal gray, and substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area (Seeley et al.,
2007). The network functions to direct cognitive resources towards sensory input, or online
representations, of motivational significance. In carrying out this function, the anterior insula
(AI), in particular, it is thought to play a role in switching from the DMN to the central
executive network (CEN) when motivation is entrained by an external event(s) (Menon &
Uddin, 2010; Uddin, Supekar, Ryali, & Menon, 2011). In the context of updating a model of
meaning, activation of the SN may coincide with activation in AP. Accepting a medial-to-
lateral distinction in AP function, coincident activation in AP would be expected to be more
lateral if the developing meaning model is influenced to a stronger extent by external content,
and more medial if the meaning model is influenced by memory (Baird et al. 2013; Bunge et
al. 2005; Green et al. 2006, 2010; Monti et al. 2007, 2009; Rutter et al. 2012; Wendelken et
al. 2008).
In the one previous published study that has directly contrasted poems with prose
(Zeman, Milton, Smith, & Rylance, 2013), regions related to the processing of poetry
included right posterior and mid-cingulate gyrus, left superior temporal gyrus (BA21), right
7
Literary awareness
temporal pole (BA 38) and bilateral hippocampi. Regions modulated by level of ‘literariness’
included left precentral gyrus, cingulate gyrus, left thalamus and caudate body, and left
cerebellum. Notably, the participants were experts and the selection of poems was familiar to
them, likely accounting for the absence of key regions hypothesized to be necessary in
building and updating new models of meaning. In contrast, when unfamiliar metaphoric lines
of poetry are contrasted with familiar sentences, left dlPFC and posterior middle temporal
gyri are recruited to a greater extent. This finding is consistent with the greater cognitive
challenges of poetry including, for example, greater control over the semantic processing of
sentences (Mashal, Faust, Hendler, & Jung-Beeman, 2009).
1.2 Current study
In the current study we scanned participants as they read and considered unfamiliar
pieces of poetry and prose of four lines in length. To enable us to systematically explore the
updating of models of meaning, the final line in half of the pieces was unexpected, triggering
a reappraisal of meaning. Neural responses to poetic and prosaic pieces were contrasted. At
a minimum, deriving meaning from poetry was expected to be more challenging than
deriving meaning from prose; thus we expected increased activity in IFG and dlPFC in
relation to processing poetic texts. Neural activity related to unexpected (where the final line
triggered a need to re-appraise) and expected (where the final line was consistent with the
meaning developed from lines 1-3) pieces was also contrasted. Here we anticipated enhanced
activity in AP and dorsal caudate in response to unexpected pieces.
Reading and comprehension are skills characterized by vast individual differences.
Indeed, we hypothesize that exposure to literature in the context of SR groups have their
effect on wellbeing by scaffolding individuals’ ability to derive meaning from complex sets
of circumstances—building literary awareness. In order to assess the extent to which
8
Literary awareness
individual differences modulated the representation of meaning, we computed a number of
behavioral regressions to include in relevant fMRI contrasts. It was assumed that individuals
who are more aware of the nuances in complex text would be better at discriminating
between simple and complex texts, and furthermore, the extent to which they can do this
would modulate their capacity to derive meaning in text generally. Following the scanning
session, participants rated all of the stimuli on the extent to which they perceived them as
poetic. From this we derived a measure of ‘poetic recognition’ by subtracting poetic ratings
for prosaic pieces (simple texts) from poetic ratings for poetry pieces (complex text).
A substantial amount of the variance in individuals’ capacity to discriminate between
complex (poems) and simple (prose) texts would be expected to relate to an underlying
ability to notice changes in meaning, and represent alternative meanings between related
meaning threads. We therefore also asked participants to rate the extent to which they
perceived a need to reappraise the developing meaning on reading the final line. From this, a
measure of ‘need for reappraisal’ was calculated by subtracting the perceived need to
reappraise meaning from pieces that ended as expected (expected pieces) from those that
ended unexpectedly (unexpected pieces). The variance shared between ‘poetic recognition’,
and ‘need for reappraisal’, was computed to act as a summary, proxy measure of literary
awareness. We chose the approach of taking the shared variance between poetic recognition
and need for reappraisal as our measure of literary awareness because the simple measure of
poetic recognition was likely to be influenced by other, unmeasured sources of individual
difference that would be used in the identification of verse (e.g. attunement to the musicality
of poetic text). If, as we expect, our measure of literary awareness reflects the skills that
support the flexible and iterative updating of meaning, tied to the timely engagement of the
SN, then we would expect the measure of literary awareness to modulate activity in dorsal
caudate, AP (medial and lateral), and cingulate, insula, and thalamic nuclei specifically.
9
Literary awareness
2. Method
The University of Liverpool Research Ethics Committee approved the study, and
participants’ consent was obtained according to the Declaration of Helsinki.
2.1 Participants: To ensure that participants were able to consider and reflect on the
brief, but complex, verbal stimuli we were using under timed conditions in the scanner, we
selected a group of individuals who we knew would be familiar enough with the
contemplation of poetry to enable them to meaningfully process the pieces. At the same time
we did not want to sample literature scholars where processing differences associated with
‘expertise’ may have been found. With this in mind, we recruited 24 right-handed first or
second year undergraduate English students (16 female; age-range 18-30) to take part in this
study.
2.2 Stimuli: Poetic pieces were chosen by the literature scholars in the research team
according to the needs stipulated by the agreed research questions. These were all taken from
published, though not widely familiar, poems. The prosaic pieces were constructed by the
research team based upon the theme and meaning embedded in poetic pieces that were not
included in the final selection of stimuli for scanning. All pieces were 4 lines long with
punctuation controlled across poetic and prosaic pieces. Poetic and prosaic pieces were
further subdivided into those that gave rise to a global meaning that could not be anticipated
based on the first 3 lines of the text (unexpected meanings requiring reappraisal of the piece),
and those with a global meaning that developed linearly during reading (expected meaning).
92 stimuli (46 poetic, 46 prosaic) were rated by a sample of 30 individuals (age-range, 16-65;
mix of educational backgrounds, with all individuals having had formal education to at least
age 16). Using 7 point scales, each stimulus was rated on confidence that the piece’s
meaning had been understood (unconfident-confident); the feeling that the piece generated
(negative-mixed-positive); the extent to which a piece had a different global meaning to that
10
Literary awareness
derived in the initial 3 lines (predicted-unpredicted meaning); and how poetic the piece was
felt to be (prose-poem).
24 poetic and 24 prosaic stimuli (12 expected and 12 unexpected for each; see Table
S2) were selected for use in the scanner. Each poetic piece was matched to a prosaic piece
both in valence and global theme. The number of words per piece did not significantly differ
between conditions (see Table S1). Stimuli of either a positive, negative, and ambiguous
emotional valence were equally represented in each condition (4 in each condition, in order to
control for the global emotional tone of the pieces read per scan). Examples of positive
themes included love and luck; examples of ambivalent themes included loss-related growth
and loneliness -related hope/faith; examples of negative themes included loss-related sadness
and danger. The same pieces were presented together in a scan for each participant, and the
order of blocks was counter-balanced across participants. Participants saw the stimuli during
the scans, and then again after scanning when they rated each piece.
2.3 Design and procedure: In the scanner, participants were asked to read and
consider each poetic and prosaic piece as best they could (reading), and to then reflect on the
meaning they had derived from the piece (reflection)—see Figure 1. 8 poetic and 8 prosaic
pieces were presented in random order in each of 3 functional scans. In each scan, four of
each linguistic category required reappraisal. To separate the signal related to the reading
and the reflection phases, and to prevent reflection on the piece prior to the reflection phase,
simple math equations were presented for 6 seconds before the onset of each piece. Each
functional scan lasted 14 minutes.
Following scanning, participants rated each stimulus on: 1) its perceived poeticness;
2) the sense of a need to reappraise the meaning of the piece after reading the final line; 3) the
extent to which they felt they understood its meaning; 4) its valence. ‘Poetic recognition’
was calculated by subtracting poetic ratings for prosaic pieces from poetic ratings for poetry
11
Literary awareness
pieces. ‘Need for reappraisal’ was calculated by subtracting the perceived need to reappraise
meaning from pieces that ended with an expected meaning (expected pieces) from those that
ended unexpectedly (unexpected pieces). Higher ratings on a 1-7 likert scale were indicative
of increased poeticness, and increased need to reappraise meaning.
--------------------------
Figure 1 about here
--------------------------
2.4 Data acquisition: Functional images were acquired using a 3 T Siemens Trio MRI
scanner with a gradient echoplanar sequence (TR = 2000 ms, TE = 30, flip angle = 90°).
Each volume consisted of 33 tilted axial slices co-planar with AC-PC (3 mm thick, 0.3 mm
slice gap; FOV 210 x 210; Matrix size 64 x 64) that provided near whole brain coverage. 432
volumes were collected per scan, with slices being acquired sequentially. Anatomical T1-
weighted images were acquired with the following parameters: TR = 500 ms, TE = 10, slice
thickness = 4 mm at a 90° flip angle. Head motion was limited using padding.
2.5 Data analysis: Data were analyzed using the FSL package, version 5.0.1.
Preprocessing steps applied to each functional scan included slice-timing correction to the
first slice, extraction of noise components in the data via Melodic ICA (using the criteria of
Kelly, Alexopoulos, Wang, et al., 2010, as a guide in selecting components), high pass
filtering that was estimated in individual scans, and spatially smoothing with a FWHM of
5mm. Individual functional scans were aligned to their anatomical counterpart using a linear
transformation method optimized with the Boundary-Based-Registration method, and were
subsequently standardized to the 2 mm MNI152 brain using a linear transformation method
with 12 degrees of freedom.
12
Literary awareness
Functional data in each scan were fit with an event-related general linear model that
was estimated through generalized least squares (i.e. OLS after whitening). Time stamps
were convolved with the standard canonical gamma function implemented in FSL (lag, 6 s;
width, 3s). Two models were fit to the linguistic stimuli. The first included 8 events from
the combination of task phase (read and reflection), linguistic category (poetic and prosaic),
and need for reappraisal (expected and unexpected). The time stamps corresponded to the
onset of each piece during reading and reflection. Four contrasts were of interest in relation
to the hypotheses: the contrast between poetic and prosaic stimuli during reading, and during
reflection (see supplementary material for conjunction contrasts).
The second model included 12 events. The 4 additional events in this model
corresponded with the onset timestamps of the 4th sentences in each condition (linguistic
category x reappraisal; separate events were included for the first 3 sentences of each
condition). Two contrasts were of interest in relation to the hypotheses: the contrast between
the 4th lines in pieces that required reappraisal (unexpected) relative to those that did not
(expected). Temporal derivatives were included in both models, and temporal filtering was
applied. Voxels were uncorrected for multiple comparisons at a threshold of p < .05 in each
individual scan.
Contrasts were averaged across runs within participant, with the subsequent averages
being entered in mixed-effect group analyses in which the parameters in all voxels close to
threshold, as established following a fast approximation of the model, were estimated using
Metropolis-Hastings Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling to lead to the best estimates of
both fixed and random effects. Contrasts were cluster corrected at a z threshold of 2.3, and a
p-value of 0.05. Group contrasts were subsequently re-run to include individual differences
variables as regressors. The contrasts that were relevant in relation to the hypotheses
included modulation of each task phase (read and reflection), independently of linguistic
13
Literary awareness
category, modulation of contrasts in which prosaic activity was subtracted from poetic
activity, and modulation of the contrast related to reappraisal (specific to 4th lines; expected
versus unexpected).
3. Results
As expected, poetic pieces were rated as more poetic than prosaic pieces (poetic M =
5.56, SD = .52; prosaic M = 3.30, SD = .81; t (23) = 12.56, p < .001), and participants were
less confident in having understood the meaning of poetic pieces, (poetic M = 4.99, SD =
1.07; prosaic M =5.92, SD = 1.14; t (23) = 6.78, p < .001). Participants were generally
accurate at discriminating between pieces requiring a reappraisal of meaning from those that
did not, showing that participants were consciously aware of the need for reappraisal
(reappraisal M = 4.18, SD = .45; no reappraisal M = 3.62, SD = .42; t (23) = 4.75, p < .001).
There was no difference in participants’ reappraisal ratings for poetic and prosaic pieces
(poetic M = 4.00, SD = .41; prosaic M = 3.80, SD = .49). There was significant shared
variance between participants’ poetic recognition and need for reappraisal scores—r (24)
= .617, p = .001, with the predicted variance in poetic recognition from reappraisal (the
shared variance) providing the proxy measure of literary awareness. Residual scores in
poetic recognition (controlling for reappraisal), and residual scores in reappraisal (controlling
for poetic recognition) were also calculated for inclusion in the subsequent fMRI contrasts.
Although participants were less confident in having understood the meaning of poetic
relative to prosaic pieces, confidence was unrelated to literary awareness or need for
reappraisal and poetic recognition (ps > .38). This is important because it demonstrates that
perceived difficulty is not determining variability in these measures. Table 1 presents the
findings related to the 5 key contrasts.
14
Literary awareness
3.1 Contrasting poetic pieces with prosaic pieces
3.1.1 Reading: During the reading phase, poetic pieces differentially recruited more
lateral frontal and temporal/occipital regions than prosaic pieces. These areas included
bilateral precentral and IFG, and right-sided dlPFC. Activation was more extensive on the
left, extending into the anterior insula, and beyond to the temporal pole. In contrast, a cluster
in dmPFC showed reduced activation during reading of poetic pieces, compared to the
reading of prosaic pieces.
3.1.2 Reflection: During the reflection phase, differential activation in left IFG and
left LOC remained. The reduced activation associated with the reading of poetry seen in
dmPFC extended during reflection to include other areas loosely corresponding with the
DMN (Figures S2 & 3).
------------------------
Table 1 about here
------------------------
3.2 Contrasting the reading of unexpected to expected: the need for reappraisal
During reappraisal (prompted by the reading of unexpected final lines), clusters that
overlapped with reading in general were evident in medial frontal, posterior MTL, and in TPJ
(30%, 65%, and 88% respectively). These findings are consistent with a linear increase in
required activity during the reading of the unexpected final line. By contrast, and consistent
with a distinct role related to the need to reappraise, clusters that did not overlap with reading
in general appeared in left lateral SFG (BA9) and dorsal caudate, extending to anterior
thalamic nuclei (Figure S4), in response to the reading of the unexpected final line.
3.3 Modulation of activity by poetic recognition, reappraisal, and literary awareness
15
Literary awareness
------------------------
Table 2 about here
------------------------
Table 2 shows how activity in response to reading and reflecting in general, followed
by the reading of and reflecting upon poetic stimuli specifically, was modulated by the
individual difference variables. During both the reading and the reflection phases of both
poetic and prosaic pieces, the proxy measure of literary awareness modulated a similar,
large, number of regions—see Figure 2. Lateral frontal areas included AP, dlPFC, IFG, and
precentral gyri, with activation being distinctly more right-sided in dlPFC and IFG.
Activation spanning regions within temporal/occipital boundaries was also stronger on the
right, in addition to activation in SMG. Similar levels of bilateral activity were observed in
the dACC, the insula, the basal ganglia, and the thalamus (extending to the brain stem). The
cerebellum was the only region in which bilateral activity was more left-sided. These
modulated clusters did not overlap with those active during reading and reflecting in general.
Note, we had not specifically hypothesized hemispheric differences in terms of modulated
region engagement; therefore the comparisons across hemispheres in Table 2 are reported in
order to facilitate better predictions in future work, rather than being an authoritative outcome
in their own right.
---------------------------
Figure 2 about here
---------------------------
16
Literary awareness
3.3.1 Specific to Reading Poetry: During reading of poetic pieces specifically,
residual variance in poetic recognition (poetic recognition > subjective need to reappraise)
modulated a single cluster that spanned from right dorsal caudate to dACC, and further to
medial and lateral AP, see Figure 3.1. Right caudate activity in this cluster mirrored the
caudate activity of the left-sided cluster related to reappraisal (unexpected > expected)—see
Figure 3.3. About half of the left caudate voxels active during reappraisal (unexpected >
expected) were modulated by literary awareness and reappraisal during reading (57%). As
Figure 3.2 shows, when reappraisal was most necessary (unexpected > expected), meaning
derivation became increasingly dependent on left rostral caudate.
---------------------------
Figure 3 about here
---------------------------
3.3.2 Specific to Reflecting on Poetry: During reflection of poetic pieces specifically,
literary awareness modulated a number of clusters—see Figure 4. Characteristic areas of the
DMN included PCC, precuneus, and dmPFC. Lateral frontal areas included AP, with
stronger activation on the left, IFG stronger on the right, and bilateral orbitofrontal cortex
(OFC) extending to the insula. ACC was also active. Temporal areas that were left-sided
included those overlapping temporal/occipital boundaries, posterior MTG, LOC and FG.
Activation extended to the hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and putamen. In parietal
cortex, bilateral activity in SMG was evident. Finally, there was a left-sided cluster in the
cerebellum.
17
Literary awareness
---------------------------
Figure 4 about here
---------------------------
4. Discussion
Our aim was to explore the neural basis of literary awareness—the capacity to derive
meaning in complex texts such as poetry. We were interested in this because we hypothesize
that exposure to literary texts can support a more fluid and flexible representation of
meaning, in order to allow for: 1) multiple potential truths to be weighted with similar levels
of curiosity, 2) changes in meaning to be noticed more easily, and 3) online meanings to be
more easily updated as additional information becomes available. We draw a parallel
between the non-linear process a reader goes through in reading a complex text, and the mix
of uncertainties, choices, blunderings, successes, and insights that we all live through on a
daily basis. This comparison extends to the premise that flexing the mechanisms that support
meaning derivation in the context of active reading may entrain individuals towards more
responsive conceptualizations of meaning in their own lives. Our findings support this
premise in that they demonstrate how our proxy measure of literary awareness modulated
regions associated with the ability to represent and manipulate fluid, flexible meanings.
4.1 The neural basis of our measure of literary awareness
The co-activation of dlPFC (BA 46), IFG, temporo-occipital regions, and ATL during
reading of poetry relative to prose is consistent with poetic text requiring the representation of
multiple meaning threads (IFG), needing more focused attention during processing (dlPFC;
temporo-occipital regions) in order to generate a holistic model of meaning (ATL).
Deactivation in dmPFC, in the context of increased activation in dlPFC and AI, suggests that
18
Literary awareness
processing of poetic content requires a switch away from stored representations to build
meaning from a novel external source. Deactivation of multiple regions that typically co-
activate in the DMN during the reflection phase potentially points to the longer time needed
to establish a stable representation of meaning for poetic pieces. Consistent with this, a
continued increase in the extent of activation in IFG and LOC while reflecting on poetry is
indicative of participants appraising varying meanings.
Our proxy measure of literary awareness modulated a number of regions making up
the CEN (dlPFC, lateral parietal, IFG, AP, and dorsal caudate) and the SN (insula, ACC,
striatopallidum, thalamus, and brain stem). Co-activation of both of these networks suggests
that increased literary awareness is indeed related to an improved capacity to reason about
events in a responsive manner, and an increased interoceptive attunement to changes in
meaning. Additional activity in OFC is also consistent with situation models having an
external focus, this time in relation to the motivational significance of meaning, as opposed to
an internal focus, where motivational significance is derived through memory (Bouret &
Richmond, 2010). Finally, activation extended to ventral striatum/nucleus accumbens, a
region associated with the perception of rewarding information (O’Doherty et al., 2004);
thus, enhanced literary awareness may increase the extent to which contemplating meaning
is perceived to be rewarding. Notably this same set of regions was modulated during reading
of, and reflection on, both simple and complex texts. This suggests that attempts to improve
literary awareness through, for example, SR groups, should have the power to alter how
individuals derive meaning in life events generally, regardless of their complexity. It does
seem possible that the efficacy of SR groups in improving wellbeing could be moderated by
the extent to which this set of regions become engaged in deriving meaning.
Modulated activity in left dorsal caudate overlapped with caudate activity that was
evoked by unexpected meanings (unexpected > expected). Activation became increasingly
19
Literary awareness
rostral as the need to update meaning became more obvious. The augmented capacity to
update internal representations associated with increased literary awareness is consistent with
more flexible/responsive meaning models. Strikingly, residual variance in poetic recognition
(variance set apart from that which could be attributed to reappraisal) modulated right dorsal
caudate. Dissociable roles for the left and right dorsal caudate in relation to the updating of
representations have yet to be delineated. We surmise that whereas left caudate activity
reflects responsive updating of online representations, modulated activity in right caudate
may reflect individual variability in the overall tolerance of meaning uncertainty.
While reflecting on poetry in particular (more than simple texts), literary awareness
modulated concurrent activity in nodes of the DMN (PCC, precuneus, dmPFC), AP and IFG,
bilateral posterior parietal, and regions of the SN (insula, ACC, putamen). This suggests that
increased literary awareness is related to an increased ability to maintain a developing
meaning model (DMN) from complex material, supported by the ability to maintain
dissociable meaning threads (IFG) that are actively reasoned about (AP and bilateral parietal)
with a high level of awareness (SN). Although there remains work to be done on the extent
to which text complexity and seriousness might moderate the benefits of SR groups to
wellbeing, it has always been the intuition of literary experts involved that complex texts
from serious literature, would be of greater benefit than linear plot-based novels. In complex
texts, the meaning behind events travels through subtle shifts, sometimes leading to an
internal state where multiple possibilities are compatible. It is in this complexity that serious
literature has a greater capacity to emulate what it is really like to be human: the thoughts,
feelings, and behaviors of imperfect characters become understood in relation to their
sociocultural context. Increasing individuals’ ability to deal with human social complexity in
text may be the driver that enables more fluid, and better reasoned, situation models of their
own complex human issues.
20
Literary awareness
Parietal activity was more posterior and dorsal to TPJ, the latter being recognized to
play a core role in reflexive access to memory (Cabeza et al., 2008; Ciaramelli et al., 2008).
It is possible that the spatial change in parietal activity reflects the effort to maintain internal
working models of meaning constructed from an external stimulus. However, concurrent
modulation of the precuneus is consistent with episodic memory retrieval and in particular,
the use of self-referential knowledge in supporting the production of inferences (see Cavanna
& Trimble, 2006, for a review). Activation of the area has also been reported in association
with efforts to build mental images to support holistic understanding during reading of poetry
(Mashal, Vishne, & Laor, 2014). Thus there is scope to consider that self-referential
knowledge of the world is used to augment access to meaning in text. Finally, modulation of
the hippocampus by literary awareness suggests that the nuances of meaning derived from the
text were consolidated to memory making them available for meaning searches in the future.
In relation to the efficacy of SR groups in improving wellbeing, the hippocampal activity
reflecting memory consolidation points to a potential pathway through which social
reasoning practiced in SR groups could come to support social reasoning in everyday life.
We considered it possible that the difficulty of deriving meaning in poetry, and not
our measure of literary awareness, might be the key explanatory factor relating to enhanced
or differentiated brain activity. However, individual differences in confidence to do with
‘getting the meaning’ did not systematically modulate brain activity. It seems, therefore, that
perceived difficulty is separable from the mechanisms that contribute to literary awareness.
4.2 From literary awareness to mental wellbeing
One of the key motivations for conducting this study was to explore how functional
brain imaging might help to elucidate the factors that underpin the ‘wellbeing’ effect of active
reading. We argue that at its core, poetic processing shares the same fundamental
21
Literary awareness
mechanisms that underpin the processing of, and decision-making within, the fluid, non-
linear and ambiguous social world (e.g. Corcoran, 2001). As has been argued that the
processing of metaphors requires the same complex skills that underpin theory of mind
(Happe, 1995; Bottini, Corcoran, Sterzi et al., 1994). Consistent with this, increased reading
of literary fiction, and not popular fiction or non-fiction, has been linked to improved use of
both cognitive and affective aspects of theory of mind (Kidd & Castano, 2013). Hence, it can
be argued that the facility to iteratively appraise complex literary material mimics the
processes of effective dynamic social perception and cognition.
Contemporary neuroscientific theories represent our brains as highly efficient, but
fallible, prediction machines (Tenenbaum, Griffiths and Kemp, 2006). Expectation biases
derived through experience influence how information is processed moment-by-moment.
The prediction error signal exists to fine tune our information processing so that the meaning
that is ‘bound’ to a stimulus or an event can be updated to account for deviation from
expectancies (O’Doherty et al., 2004; Pessiglione, Seymour, Flandin, Dolan & Frith 2006).
At times, however, this usually reliable fast track to information processing leads to what can
appear to be irrationality (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974; Kahneman, 2012). Socio-cognitive
research into mental health difficulties suggests that both information processing biases and
adverse experiences ‘color’ our fast track processing, thus our view of the anticipated social
world, leading to distortions in predictive reasoning that, to others, appear as irrational
(Bentall, Corcoran, Howard, Blackwood & Kinderman, 2001; Corcoran & Frith, 2003;
Dannlowski, Stuhrmann, Beutelmann et al. 2012).
When very high value is attributed to a belief or action, prediction errors of minimal
size would not be expected to readjust the value of the belief or action to any meaningful
extent (Gradin, Kumar, Waiter et al., 2011; Moran, Owen, Crookes et al. 2008). In addition,
even when PEs are consciously registered, motivated reasoning that negates the PE as an
22
Literary awareness
anomaly further serves to protect the high value of formerly reliable, tried and tested,
interpretations, attributions, beliefs, and actions (Kunda, 1990; Westen, Blagov, Harenski,
Kils & Hamann, 2006). When the value of maladaptive beliefs that sustain mental health
difficulties are protected in this way, decision-making and reasoning becomes ‘sticky’, rigid,
inflexible, and maladaptive, sustaining mental health difficulties (Corcoran, Cummins,
Rowse et al., 2006; Kahneman, Slovic, & Tversky 1982).
Part of the wellbeing efficacy of SR may come from pulling individuals away from
processing their struggles through tired and ineffective lenses and towards more diverse,
novel and effective reasoning options. Consistent with this, depressive beliefs have been
linked to dysfunctional connectivity in DMN, SN, and CEN (Hamilton, 2013; Menon, 2011),
in addition to reduced caudate volume and reduced dorsal- and ventral striatal activity
(Pizzagalli, Holmes, Dillon et al., 2009). Furthermore, increased literary awareness might
reduce ruminative thinking, readjusting connectivity between the DMN, SN, and CEN.
Consistent with this, lateral prefrontal activity is associated with the ability to avoid
responding on the basis of a belief, in favour of a logical response (De Neys, Vartanian, &
Goel, 2008; Goel & Dolan, 2003; Stollstorff, Vartanian, & Goel, 2012; Tsujii, Masuda,
Akiyama, & Watanabe, 2010; Tsujii & Watanabe, 2010). Increased literary awareness might
increase the tendency to search for an alternative meaning framework within which to situate
events, thus providing a scaffold to help in the replacement of dysfunctional with functional
beliefs that cannot so easily sustain worries, troubles and negative automatic thoughts.
In short, we contend that our results demonstrate that increasing literary awareness is
related to brain activity that supports greater capacity to process dynamic models of meaning.
If the reading of literature can encourage and train a more dynamic, fluid, and less rigid
reasoning style, then this will have intrinsic therapeutic benefits that should include
improved, adaptive social functioning.
23
Literary awareness
4.3 Limitations and future research
Our measure of literary awareness was largely influenced by one genre of complex
text: poetry. Although we sought to strengthen the measure by demonstrating the extent to
which variance in poetic recognition overlapped with the need for reappraisal, further work
could focus on whether our findings are limited to the representation of meaning in poetic
forms. In principle, however, we would expect that sensitivity to meaning complexity in any
text would modulate the same underlying mechanisms revealed here.
We chose a sample of English students in order to ensure that, in this first study,
baseline levels of literary awareness were high enough to guarantee some ability to recognize
and process poetry within the demanding confines of an fMRI activation study. While our
students were hardly literary scholars, the extent to which our findings reflect the relative
skills of our sample is unclear, and would need to be explored in future studies. The likely
influence of the backgrounds of our sample is reduced by the fact that all of the stimuli we
used in this experiment were unfamiliar to the participants.
Regardless of how participants were selected, it is likely that literary awareness is
related to level of general intelligence. In particular, we would expect this to be a type of
social intelligence, going beyond that typically measured in cognitive assessments of
intelligence and including aspects of social cognition such as perspective taking. Future
research of this nature should consider including measures of IQ and social intelligence. Our
sample had twice as many females as males, and we acknowledge that gender may play some
role in relation to the neural representation of literary awareness.
Using functional imaging in addressing hypotheses related to complex human abilities
increases the number of regions supporting task performance; thus increasing the likelihood
of a mismatch between the function that is attributed to particular region, and its true
24
Literary awareness
function. In facing this issue, we created a well controlled 2 x 2 design, and supplemented
our analyses with individual difference variables. That said, with this caveat in mind, we are
hopeful that others will see the utility in assessing the extent to which measures of literary
awareness modulate functional activity during other tasks, both linguistic and non-linguistic.
Our brains are capable of complex abilities, and sometimes when we take a look at that
complexity, we see smaller meaning threads that, without the presence of a whole, would not
be seen; for example, the potential for trait and state (alternatively, tonic and phasic) aspects
to right- and left dorsal caudate function. Finally, we had no clearly justifiable reasons to
predict hemispheric differences modulated by literary awareness, another issue requiring
follow-up.
Despite these limitations, we argue that our findings suggest the manner in which
active reading can benefit wellbeing by encouraging a more responsive and flexible
information processing style that crosses the boundary between reading text, and reasoning in
every-day life. The experienced reader is aware of multiple meaning threads, and is vigilant
to the need to update meaning while building an iterative, yet holistic model of a poem or
plot; we are each readers and reflectors of our own and others’ developing plots: were we
better readers, would we not be better writers-?
5. Funding
This work was supported by in-house funding provided to the authors by the Institute
of Psychology, Health, and Society, University of Liverpool. The funding source had no
involvement in the study design, data collection and analysis, and the interpretation of the
data.
25
Literary awareness
6. References
Baird, B., Smallwood, J., Gorgolewski, K.J., & Margulies, D.S. (2013). Medial and lateral
networks in anterior prefrontal cortex support metacognitive ability for memory and
perception. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(42), 16657-16665. Doi:
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0786-13.2013
Bentall, R.P., Corcoran, R., Howard, R., Blackwood, N., & Kinderman, P. (2001).
Persecutory delusions: a review and theoretical integration. Clinical Psychology
Review, 21(8), 1143-1192. Doi:10.1016/S0272-7358(01)00106-4
Billington, J., Humphreys, A.L., Jones, A., & McDonnell, K. (2014). A literature-based
intervention for people with chronic pain. Arts and Health: And International
Journal for Research, Policy, and Practice, advanced online publication. Doi:
10.1080/17533015.2014.957330
Binder, J.R., Desai, R.H., Graves, W.W., & Conant, L.L. (2009). Where is the semantic
system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies.
Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2767-2796. Doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp055
Bottini, G., Corcroan, R., Sterzi, R., Paulesu, E., Schenone, P., Scarpa, P., Frackowiak,
R.S.J., & Frith, C.D. (1994). The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of
figurative aspects of language: a positron emission tomography activation study.
Brain, 117, 1241-1253. Doi: 10.1093/brain/117.6.1241
Bouret, S. & Richmond, B.J. (2010). Ventromedial and orbital prefrontal neurons
differentially encode internally and externally driven motivational values in monkeys.
Journal of Neuroscience, 30(25), 8591-8601. Doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0049-
10.2010
26
Literary awareness
Bunge, S.A., Wendelken, C., Badre, D., & Wagner, A.D. (2005). Analogical reasoning and
prefrontal cortex: Evidence for separable retrieval and integration mechanisms.
Cerebral Cortex, 15, 239–249. Doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh126
Cabeza, R., Ciaramelli, E., Olson, I.R., & Moscovitch, M. (2008). The parietal cortex and
episodic memory: an attentional account. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(8), 613-
625. Doi:10.1038/nrn2459
Cardinal, R.N., Parkinson, J.A., Hall, J., Everitt, B.J. (2002). Emotion and motivation: the
role of the amygdala, ventral striatum, and prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience
Biobehavioral Review, 26, 321–352. Doi:10.1016/S0149-7634(02)00007-6
Cavanna, A.E. & Trimble, M.R. (2006). The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy
and behavioral correlates. Brain, 129, 564-583. Doi: 10.1093/brain/awl004
Ciaramelli, E., Grady, C.L., & Moscovitch, M. (2008). Top-down and bottom-up attention to
memory: a hypothesis (AtoM) on the role of the posterior parietal cortex in memory
retriaval. Neuropsychologia, 46(7), 1828-1851. Doi:10.1016/
j.neuropsychologia.2008.03.022
Corbetta, M., Patel, G., & Shulman, G.L. (2008). The reorienting system of the human brain:
from environment to theory of mind. Neuron, 58(3), 306-324. Doi: 10.1016/
j.neuron.2008.04.017
Corcoran, R., Cummins, S., Rowse, G., Moore, R., Blackwood, N., Howard, R., Kinderman,
P., & Bentall, R.P. (2006). Reasoning under uncertainty; heuristic judgments in
patients with persecutory delusions or depression. Psychological Medicine, 36, 1109-
1118. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S003329170600794X
Corcoran, R. & Frith, C.D. (2003). Autobiographical memory and theory of mind: evidence
of a relationship in schizophrenia. Psychological Medicine, 33(5), 897-905. Doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291703007529
27
Literary awareness
Dannlowski, U., Stuhrmann, A., Beutelmann, V., Zwanzger, P., Lenzen, T., Gotegerd, D.,
Domschke, K., Hohoff, C., Ohrmann, P., Bauer, J., Lindner, C., Postert, C., Konrad,
C., Arolt, V., Heindel, W., Suslow, T., & Kugel, H. (2012). Limbic scars: long-term
consequences of childhood maltreatment revealed by functional and structural
magnetic resonance imaging. Biological Psychiatry, 71(4), 286-293. Doi:
10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.10.021
De Neys, W., Vartanian, O., & Goel, V. (2008). Smarter than we think: when our brains
detect that we are biased. Psychological Science, 19(5), 483-489. Doi:
10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02113.x
Delgado, M.R., Locke, H.M., Stenger, V.A., & Fiez, J.A. (2003). Dorsal striatum responses
to reward and punishment: Effects of valence and magnitude manipulations.
Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 27–38. Doi:
10.3758/CABN.3.1.27
Dowrick, C., Billington, J., Robinson, J., Hamer, A., & Williams, C. (2012). Get into
Reading as an intervention for common mental health problems: exploring catalysts
for change. Medical Humanities, 38, 15-20. Doi: 10.1136/medhum-2011-010083
Eviatar, Z., & Just, M. A. (2006). Brain correlates of discourse processing: an fMRI
investigation of irony and conventional metaphor comprehension. Neuropsychologia,
44(12), 2348-2359. Doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.007
Ferstl, E.C., Neumann, J., Bolger, C., & von Cramon, D.Y. (2008). The extended language
network: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension. Human
Brain Mapping, 29, 281-593. Doi: 10.1002/hbm.20422
Ferstl, E.C, Rinck, M., & von Cramon D.Y. (2005). Emotional and temporal aspects of
situation model processing during text comprehension: An event-related fMRI study.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 724–739. Doi: 10.1162/0898929053747658
28
Literary awareness
Goel, V. & Dolan, R. (2003). Explaining modulation of reasoning by belief. Cognition, 87,
11–22. Doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00185-3
Gradin, V.B., Kumar, P., Waiter, G., Ahern, T., Stickle, C., Milders, M., Reid, I., Hall, J., &
Steele, J.D. (2011). Expected value and prediction error abnormalities in depression
and schizophrenia. Brain, 134(6), 1751-1764. Doi: 10.1093/brain/awr059
Green, A.E., Fugelsang, J.A., Kraemer, D.J.M., Shamosh, N.A., & Dunbar, K.N. (2006).
Frontopolar cortex mediates abstract integration in analogy. Brain Research, 1096,
125–137. Doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.024
Green, A.E., Kraemer, D.J.M., Fugelsang, J.A., Gray, J.R., & Dunbar, K.N. (2010).
Connecting long distance: Semantic distance in analogical reasoning modulates
frontopolar cortex activity. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 70–76. Doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp081
Hamilton, J.P., Chen, M.C., Gotlib, I.H. (2013). Neural systems approaches to understanding
major depressive disorder: an intrinsic functional organization perspective.
Neurobiology of Disease, 52, 4-11. Doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2012.01.015
Happe, F.G.E. (1995). Understanding minds and metaphors: insights from the study of
figurative language in autism. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10, 275-295. Doi:
10.1207/s15327868ms1004_3
Kahneman, D. (2012). Thinking fast and slow. London, England: Penguin Group
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and
biases. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press
Keidal, J.L., Davis, P.M., Gonzalez-Diaz, V., Martin, C.D., & Thierry, G. (2013). How
Shakespeare tempests the brain: neuroimaging insights. Cortex, 49(4), 913-919. Doi:
10.1016/j.cortex.2012.03.011
Kelly, R.E., Alexopoulos, G.S., Wang, Z., Gunning, F.M., Murphy, C.F., Morimoto, S.S.,
Kanellopoulos, D., Jia, Z., Lim, K.O., & Hoptman, M.J. (2010). Visual inspection of
29
Literary awareness
independent components: defining a procedure for artifact removal from fMRI data.
Journal of Neuroscience Method, 189, 233-245. Doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.03.028
Kidd, D.C. & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science,
342, 377-380. Doi:10.1126/science.1239918
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse processing: a construction-
integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163-182. Doi: 10.1037/0033-
295X.95.2.163
Kintsch, W. & Rawson, K.A. (2005). Comprehension. In M.J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.),
The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 209-226). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Knutson, B. & Cooper, J.C. (2005). Functional magnetic resonance imaging of reward
prediction. Current Opinion in Neurology, 18, 411–417. Doi: 10.1097/
01.wco.0000173463.24758.f6
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case of motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480-
498. Doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
Lee, S. S. & Dapretto, M. (2006). Metaphorical vs. literal word meanings: fMRI evidence
against a selective role of the right hemisphere. NeuroImage, 29, 536-544. Doi:
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.003
Longden, E., Davis, P., Billington, J., Lampropoulou, S., Farrington, G., Magee, F., Walsh,
E., & Corcoran, R. (2015). Shared Reading: assessing the intrinsic value of a
literature-based health intervention. Medical Humanities, Online First. Doi:
10.1136/medhum-2015-010704
Mashal, N., Faust, M., Hendel, T., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2009). An fMRI study of processing
novel metaphoric sentences. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain, and Cognition,
14(1), 30-54. Doi: 10.1080/13576500802049433
30
Literary awareness
Mashal, N., Vishne, T., & Laor, N. (2014). The role of the precuneus in metaphor
comprehension: evidence from an fMRI study in people with schizophrenia and
healthy participants. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 818. Doi:
10.3389/fnhum.2014.00818
Melrose, R.J., Poulin, R.M., & Stern, C.E. (2007). An fMRI investigation of the role of the
basal ganglia in reasoning. Brain Research, 1142, 146-158. Doi: 10.1016/
j.brainres.2007.01.060
Menon, V. (2011). Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: a unifying triple
network model. Trends in Cognitive Science, 15, 483-506. Doi:
10.1016/j.tics.2011.08.003
Menon, V. & Uddin, L.Q. (2010). Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network
model of insula function. Brain Structure and Function, 214, 655–667. Doi:
10.1007/ s00429-010-0262-0
Monti, M.M., Osherson, D.N., Martinez, M.J., & Parsons, L.M. (2007). Functional
neuroanatomy of deductive inference: A language-independent distributed network.
NeuroImage, 37, 1005–1016. Doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.069
Monti, M.M., Parsons, L.M., & Osherson, D.N. (2009). The boundaries of language and
thought in deductive inference. PNAS, 106(30), 12554-12559. Doi: 10.1073/
pnas.0902422106
Moran, P.M., Owen, L., Crookes, A.E., Al-Uzri, M.M., & Reveley, M.A. (2008). Abnormal
prediction error is associated with negative and depressive symptoms in
schizophrenia. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry,
32(1), 116-123. Doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2007.07.021
31
Literary awareness
O’Doherty, J., Dayan, P., Schultz, J., Deichmann, R., Friston, K., & Dolan, R. J. (2004).
Dissociable roles of the ventral and dorsal striatum in instrumental conditioning.
Science, 304, 452–454. Doi: 10.1126/science.1094285
O’Sullivan, N., Szczepanowski, R., El-Deredy, W., Mason, L., Bentall, R.P. (2011). FMRI
evidence of a relationship between hypomania and both increased goal sensitivity and
positive outcome-expectancy bias. Neuropsychologia, 49, 2825-2835. Doi:
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.06.008
Perfetti, C.A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension
skill. In M.J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp.
227-247). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Pessiglione, M., Seymour, B., Flandin, G., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C.D. (2006). Dopamine-
dependent prediction errors underpin reward-seeking behaviour in humans. Nature,
442, 1042–1045. Doi:10.1038/nature05051
Pizzagalli, D.A., Holmes, A.J., Dillon, D.G., Goetz, E.L., Birk, J.L., Bogdan, R., Dougherty,
D.D., Iosifescu, D.V., Rauch, S.L., Fava, M. (2009). Reduced caudate and nucleus
accumbens response to rewards in unmediated individuals with major depressive
disorder. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 166(5), 702-710. Doi:
10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08081201
Prado, J., Chadha, A., & Booth, J.R. (2011). The brain network for deductive reasoning: a
quantitative meta-analysis of 28 neuroimaging studies. Journal of Cognitive
Neuroscience, 22(11), 3483-3497. Doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00063
Rapp, A.M, Leube, D.T., Erb, M., Grodd, W., & Kircher, T.J. (2004). Neural correlates of
metaphor processing. Brain Research Cognitive Brain Research, 20, 395–402. Doi:
10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.03.017
32
Literary awareness
Rutter, B., Kröger, S., Stark, R., Schweckendiek, J., Windmann, S., Hermann, C., &
Abraham, A. (2012). Can clouds dance? Neural correlates of passive conceptual
expansion using a metaphor processing task: implications for creative cognition.
Brain and Cognition, 78, 114-122. Doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.11.002
Seeley, W.W., Menon, V., Schatzberg, A.F., Keller, J., Glover, G.H., Kenna, H., Reiss, A.L.,
& Greicius, M.D. (2007). Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience
processing and executive control. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 2349–2356. Doi:
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5587-06.2007
Shibata, M., Abe, J., Terao, A., & Miyamoto, T. (2007). Neural mechanisms involved in the
comprehension of metaphor and literal sentences: an fMRI study. Brain Research,
1166, 92-102. Doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.06.040
Stollstorff, M., Vartanian, O., & Goel, V. (2012). Levels of conflict in reasoning modulate
right lateral prefrontal cortex. Brain Research, 1428, 24-32. Doi: 10.1016/
j.brainres.2011.05.045
Stringaris, A.K., Medford, N.C., Giampietro, V., Brammer, M.J., & David, A.S. (2007).
Deriving meaning: Distinct neural mechanisms for metaphoric, literal, and non-
meaningful sentences. Brain and Language, 100, 150-162. Doi: 10.1016/
j.bandl.2005.08.001
Tenenbaum, J.B., Griffiths, T.L., & Kemp, C. (2006). Theory-based Bayesian models of
inductive learning and reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(7), 309-318. Doi:
10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.009
Tsujii, T., Masuda, S., Akiyama, T., & Watanabe, S. (2010). The role of inferior frontal
cortex in belief–bias reasoning: an rTMS study. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2005–2008.
Doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.03.021
33
Literary awareness
Tsujii, T. & Watanabe, S. (2010). Neural correlates of belief–bias reasoning under time
pressure: a near-infrared spectroscopy study. NeuroImage, 50, 1320–1326. Doi:
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.026
Turkeltaub, P.E., Eden, G.F., Jones, K.M., & Zeffiro, T.A. (2002). Meta-analysis of the
functional neuroanatomy of single-word reading: method and validation.
NeuroImage, 16, 765-780. Doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1131
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases.
Science, 185, 1124-1131. Doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
Uddin, L.Q., Supekar, K.S., Ryali, S., & Menon, V. (2011). Dynamic reconfiguration of
structural and functional connectivity across core neurocognitive brain networks with
development. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(50), 18578-18589. Doi: 10.1523/
JNEUROSCI.4465-11.2011
Wallis, J.D. (2007). Orbitofrontal cortex and its contribution to decision-making. Annual
Review of Neuroscience, 30, 31-56. Doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094334
Wendelken, C., Nakhabenko, D., Donohue, S.E., Carter, C.S., & Bunge, S.A. (2008). “Brain
is to thought as stomach is to ??”: Investigating the role of rostrolateral prefrontal
cortex in relational reasoning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 682–693. Doi:
10.1162/jocn.2008.20055
Westen, D., Blagov, P.S., Harenski, K., Kilts, C., & Hamann, S. (2006). Neural bases of
motivated reasoning: an fMRI study of emotional constraints on partisan political
judgement in the 2004 U.S. presidential election. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,
18(11), 1947-1958. Doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.11.1947
Zeman, A., Milton, F., Smith, A., & Rylance, R. (2013). By heart: an fMRI study of brain
activation by poetry and prose. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 20(9-10), 132-158
34
Literary awareness
Zwaan, R.A. & Radvansky, G.A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and
memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162-185. Doi: 10.1037/0033-
2909.123.2.162
Figure captions
Figure 1
35
Literary awareness
Time-line for a single trial
Figure 2
T-map of areas modulated by literary awareness during reflection on both poetic and prosaic
stimuli (cluster corrected threshold of z = 2.3, p < .05 –increasing the threshold did not
substantially alter the pattern), spanning medial-to-lateral in the right hemisphere. Regions
included ACC, basal ganglia, thalamus, precuneus, SMG, temporal/occipital, insula, and
lateral frontal
Figure 3
T-map of areas modulated by residual poetic recognition during reading of poetic stimuli, far
left (1), including right caudate, extending to medial and lateral anterior prefrontal. Middle
(2) = caudate activity during reappraisal, specifically in red, compared with caudate activity
modulated by literary awareness during reading of both poetic and prosaic stimuli. Right (3)
= caudate activity during reappraisal, in red, compared to caudate activity modulated by
residual poetic recognition during reading of poetic stimuli
Figure 4
T-map of areas modulated by literary awareness during reflection on poetic stimuli (cluster
corrected threshold of z = 2.3, p < .05), spanning lateral-to-medial in the left hemisphere,
regions including medial temporal, supramarginal gyrus, lateral frontal, insula, putamen.
Right upper = right inferior frontal gyrus and supramarginal gyrus; right lower = medial
frontal and posterior cingulate
Figure S1
T-map of areas active during reading (cluster corrected threshold of z = 2.3, p < .05)
Figure S2
T-map of areas differentially active during reading of poetry (cluster corrected threshold of z
= 2.3, p < .05). Axial slices show bilateral temporal/occipital clusters, in addition to anterior
36
Literary awareness
temporal and insula activity; sagittal slices additionally show right-sided dlPFC,
IFG/precentral activity, and dmPFC deactivation
Figure S3
T-map of areas differentially active while reflecting on poetry (cluster corrected threshold of
z = 2.3, p < .05). Increased activation was observed in left IFG and LOC; deactivation was
observed in dmPFC, precuneous/posterior cingulate, and right-sided V1, lateral parietal, and
central opercular cortex
Figure S4
T-map of areas differentially active during reappraisal (cluster corrected threshold of z = 2.3,
p < .05). Regions included superior frontal gyrus, dACC, caudate, extending to thalamus,
and TPJ—all left-sided
Table captions
Table 1
37
Literary awareness
Statistics on brain regions that differentially responded to poetry during reading and
reflection, in addition to regions that differentially responded to reappraisal (unexpected >
expected). All clusters were corrected at z = 2.3, p < .05. The percentage of active voxels
that the reading contrasts shared with reading in general (poetry + prosaic), and that the
reflection contrasts shared with reflection in general are also shown, in addition to the
percentage of voxels that were modulated by literary awareness (LA). + = 57% overlap in the
caudate specifically; * = 35% overlap in precuneous specifically (PreCG = precentral gyrus;
IFGpo = inferior frontal gyrus pars orbitalis; FOC = frontal opercular cortex; a.ins = anterior
insula; TP = temporal pole; pMTG = posterior middle temporal gyrus; LOC = lateral
occipital cortex; FGpt & FGo = fusiform gyrus posterior temporal and occipital; pITG =
posterior inferior temporal gyrus; dACC = dorsal anterior cingulate; mAP = medial anterior
prefrontal; pSMG = posterior supramarginal gyrys; AG = angular gyrus; PCC = posterior
cingulate)
Table 2
Statistics on brain regions that were modulated by literary awareness (LA) and residual
variance in poetic recognition (PR). All clusters were corrected at z = 2.3, p < .05 (FOC =
frontal opercular cortex; ITG = inferior temporal gyrus; FG = fusiform gyrus; LG = lingual
gyrus; LOC = lateral occipital cortex; lm AP = lateral and medial anterior prefrontal; MFG =
middle frontal gyrus; OFC = orbitofrontal cortex; dACC = dorsal anterior cingulate; ins =
insula; hippoc = hippocampus; parahippoc = parahippocampal gyrus). Clusters in reading
and reflection conjunctions were extensive; therefore the volume of voxels for each of the
key regions within clusters was derived as a function of being left- or right-sided (prop. right
= proportion of voxels that were right-sided)
Table S1
38
Literary awareness
Descriptive statistics on the number of words in each condition, and the average number of
words per line
Table S2
Stimuli used in the study
Table S3
Statistics on brain regions that responded similarly to poetic and prosaic stimuli during
reading and reflection. All clusters were corrected at z = 2.3, p < .05. The percentage of
active voxels that were modulated by the variance shared between literary awareness is
shown in the far right column (SFG = superior frontal gyrus; mAP = medial anterior
prefrontal; SubC = subcallosal cortex; STG = superior temporal gyrus; pSMG = posterior
supramarginal gyrus; AG = angular gyrus; TP = temporal pole; OFC = orbitofrontal cortex;
IFGpt = inferior frontal gyrus pars triangularis; Hippoc = hippocampus; Amyg = amygdala;
LG = lingual gyrus; MTG = middle temporal gyrus; IFGpt = inferior frontal gyrus pars
orbitalis; PCC = posterior cingulate
39