16
Summary Marie Yarbrough

Summary Marie Yarbrough. Introduction History of Image Forgery Method Segmentation Classification Common-Sense Reasoning Conclusion

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Summary Marie Yarbrough. Introduction History of Image Forgery Method Segmentation Classification Common-Sense Reasoning Conclusion

Summary

Marie Yarbrough

Page 2: Summary Marie Yarbrough. Introduction History of Image Forgery Method Segmentation Classification Common-Sense Reasoning Conclusion

IntroductionHistory of Image ForgeryMethod

SegmentationClassificationCommon-Sense Reasoning

Conclusion

Page 3: Summary Marie Yarbrough. Introduction History of Image Forgery Method Segmentation Classification Common-Sense Reasoning Conclusion

Images have been a powerful media of delivering and communicating information ever since their inception.

The act of distorting and changing images has been around for the same amount of time.

Detecting these image manipulations images has become and important problem.Even more so now that we have entered the

digital age.This paper produces a way of detecting these

falsified images.

Page 4: Summary Marie Yarbrough. Introduction History of Image Forgery Method Segmentation Classification Common-Sense Reasoning Conclusion

People have been doing image manipulation since the beginning and these forgeries have been put to many uses. Such asJournalists who want to make up their own

storiesPhotojournalists who want dramatic scenesScientists who forge or repeat images in

academic papersPolitian's who try to direct public opinion by

exaggerating or falsifying political events

Page 5: Summary Marie Yarbrough. Introduction History of Image Forgery Method Segmentation Classification Common-Sense Reasoning Conclusion

There are 4 manipulation techniques that are used on images.Deletion of details: removing scene elementsInsertion of detail: adding scene elementsPhotomontage: combining multiple imagesFalse Captioning: misrepresenting image

content.

Page 6: Summary Marie Yarbrough. Introduction History of Image Forgery Method Segmentation Classification Common-Sense Reasoning Conclusion

A series of photos

of the “Devil’s

Den” sniper

photographed

after the battle of

Gettysburg. The

first three photos

show the soldier

where he fell in

battle. The fourth

shows him

“Posed” for

dramatic effect.

History of Image Forgeries

Page 7: Summary Marie Yarbrough. Introduction History of Image Forgery Method Segmentation Classification Common-Sense Reasoning Conclusion

The author proposes using Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques of common-sense reasoning to detect duplicated and anomalous elements in a set of images.

The basic premise: If they can detect a set of key elements in an image then they can detect if they have been moved, added, or deleted from a scene prior to image created.

Page 8: Summary Marie Yarbrough. Introduction History of Image Forgery Method Segmentation Classification Common-Sense Reasoning Conclusion

The most important step of this process it to split the images into Regions of Importance (ROI).

They use mean-shift image segmentation to decompose an image into homogeneous regions.

Routine has inputs: Spatial radius: hs Color radius: hr Minimum number of pixels: M

They then over segment the image using low values of hr and M and merge adjacent regions.

Page 9: Summary Marie Yarbrough. Introduction History of Image Forgery Method Segmentation Classification Common-Sense Reasoning Conclusion

(Top)Results of mean-

shift segmentation

with parameters hs =

7, hr = 6, and M=50.

(Bottom) Results of

region merging.

Segmentation

Page 10: Summary Marie Yarbrough. Introduction History of Image Forgery Method Segmentation Classification Common-Sense Reasoning Conclusion

After they segment the image the next step is to classify the ROI.

They propose a segment based classification scheme.Brute force pixel comparisons take too long to

do. Segment-wise classification reduces the size of the problem space significantly.

Comparing the relationship of ROI across a corpus of images gives the ability to determine if a scene has been manipulated during the photo recording process.

Page 11: Summary Marie Yarbrough. Introduction History of Image Forgery Method Segmentation Classification Common-Sense Reasoning Conclusion

They set about this classification by computing an importance map that assigns a scalar value to each pixel estimating the importance of that image location based on an attention model.

They use measures of visual salience, image regions likely to be interesting to the low-level vision system, and high-level detectors for specific objects that are likely to be important.

Page 12: Summary Marie Yarbrough. Introduction History of Image Forgery Method Segmentation Classification Common-Sense Reasoning Conclusion

(Top) Importance

map. Saliency

regions are

outlined in

magenta, face

regions in cyan.

(Bottom) Regions

of importance.

Page 13: Summary Marie Yarbrough. Introduction History of Image Forgery Method Segmentation Classification Common-Sense Reasoning Conclusion

They use two different approaches to assist digital forensics.To resolve local classification ambiguities

within images, they query a knowledge base to resolve the proper relationA common-sense knowledge base such as Cyc and

OpenMind is well suited for this task.For example, given two large horizontal blue

regions many classifiers cannot distinguish which is ‘sky’ and which is ‘water’. A common-sense knowledge base can be queried to find the answer.

Page 14: Summary Marie Yarbrough. Introduction History of Image Forgery Method Segmentation Classification Common-Sense Reasoning Conclusion

Then, they reason across a larger corpus of images to find unique or missing elements during an investigation.In many cases, the single image might not tell the

complete story.A collection of photos, however, does show a

narrative of a larger story.For example, a man-made object such as a plane in

a field of grass should raise suspicion. Unless, all the photos in a corpus have a similar qualitative structure.

Page 15: Summary Marie Yarbrough. Introduction History of Image Forgery Method Segmentation Classification Common-Sense Reasoning Conclusion

They suggest a software system based on a combination of existing tools to identify common objects across a corpus of images. By visualizing such objects, as in this figure, even a layperson can quickly determine whether a given image isfalsely captioned.

Common-Sense Reasoning

Page 16: Summary Marie Yarbrough. Introduction History of Image Forgery Method Segmentation Classification Common-Sense Reasoning Conclusion

Through a series of segmentation, classification, and common sense reasoning they can find parts of images that might have been manipulated.

These methods are limited by the performance of the components they use though.