189
APPENDIX B Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element October 2018

Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

APPENDIX B Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element

October 2018

Page 2: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

Visualize 2045 is developed by the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (TPB), the federally designated metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for metropolitan Washington. It is responsible for developing and carrying out a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process in the metropolitan area. Members of the TPB include representatives of the transportation agencies of the states of Maryland and Virginia and the District of Columbia, 24 local governments, the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, the Maryland and Virginia General Assemblies, and nonvoting members from the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority and federal agencies. The TPB is staffed by the Department of Transportation Planning at the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG).

CREDITS Editor: Andrew Austin, Department of Transportation Planning (DTP) Contributing Editors: John Swanson, DTP Abigail Zenner, DTP

ACCOMMODATIONS POLICY Alternative formats of this document are available upon request. Visit www.mwcog.org/accommodations or call (202) 962-3300 or (202) 962-3213 (TDD).

TITLE VI NONDISCRIMINATION POLICY The Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG) fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes and regulations prohibiting discrimination in all programs and activities. For more information, to file a Title VI related complaint, or to obtain information in another language, visit www.mwcog.org/nondiscrimination or call (202) 962-3300.

El Consejo de Gobiernos del Área Metropolitana de Washington (COG) cumple con el Título VI de la Ley sobre los Derechos Civiles de 1964 y otras leyes y reglamentos en todos sus programas y actividades. Para obtener más información, someter un pleito relacionado al Título VI, u obtener información en otro idioma, visite www.mwcog.org/nondiscrimination o llame al (202) 962-3300.

Copyright © 2018 by the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments

SUMMARY OF PROJECTS IN THE FINANCIALLY- CONSTRAINED ELEMENT OF THE VISUALIZE 2045 LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION October 17, 2018

ABOUT VISUALIZE 2045 & THE TPB Visualize 2045 is the federally required long-range transportation plan for the National Capital Region. It identifies and analyzes all regionally significant transportation investments planned through 2045 to help decision makers and the public “visualize” the region’s future.

Page 3: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 

PROJECT PROFILES 2 

PROJECT SUBMISSIONS, THE RTPP, AND FEDERAL PLANNING FACTORS 33 

PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORMS 37 

ALL PROJECTS IN THE CONSTRAINED ELEMENT OF VISUALIZE 2045 106 

TECHNICAL INPUTS SOLICITATION SUBMISSION GUIDE 172 

Page 4: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1

INTRODUCTION

The financially constrained element of Visualize 2045 contains more than 600 projects. These projects cover all modes, ranging from multi-billion-dollar highway and transit projects to local bridge replacements to bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Of these projects, the 123 listed and mapped in Chapter 5 of the plan are significant enough in scope or cost to be considered a “major” project on the regional scale.

At the outset of the development of Visualize 2045, the region’s transportation agencies submitted 60 new projects and made updates to more than 300 projects already included in the long-range plan – either changing completion dates, scopes, or the costs of projects. Fifteen of those new or updated projects are included in the lists and maps of major projects and have been highlighted in the Project Profiles on pages 3–32 of this document and Tables 1 and 2 (pages 35 and 36) that were prepared for public comment at the beginning of the development of Visualize 2045.

The information in this document is presented as released for public comment in December 2017 and updated for the final public comment period from September 7 – October 7, 2018. There are four sections in this appendix: Project Profiles; Table 1 - and Table 2; detailed Project Submission Forms; and a complete listing of projects included in the financially constrained element of Visualize 2045.

The Project Profiles provide easy-to-read project descriptions and maps with a focus on how each project supports the goals outlined in the TPB’s Regional Transportation Priorities Plan (RTPP) and the federal planning factors set forth in the FAST Act. Tables 1 and 2 provide visual comparisons of how the implementing agencies believe that these 15 new and updated projects support the RTPP and the federal planning factors. The Project Submission Forms provide greater detail about these projects, as provided by the implementing agencies. The complete listing of projects in the constrained element of Visualize 2045 is divided up by the submitting agencies and then by project or facility type. Each of those groups are also sorted as to whether the project expands the capacity of our region’s transportation system, provides maintenance and a state of good repair, or is an ongoing operational program. The constrained element ID (CEID) for each project listed provides a link to the full project description.

Page 5: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT PROFILES

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 2

Page 6: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

DC BICYCLE LANES Various Locations Districtwide

Visualize2045.org

MAJOR ADDITION VISUALIZE 2045

Basic Project Information

Project Length……………………………………6 Miles

Anticipated Completion………………………...2018, 2023

Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$28 million

Submitting Agency………………………………District DOT

Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….

☐ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

CEID…………………………………………….multiple

FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.

Project Description DDOT is proposing adding six new segments to its existing bicycle path network. The following projects will remove one or more traffic lanes to allow for separated bicycle lanes.

• Pennsylvania Ave. SE from 2nd St./Independence Ave.to Barney Circle (1.3 miles)

• 17th St. NW from New Hampshire Ave. to K St. (<1 mile)• K St. from 7th St. NW to 1st St. NE (<1 mile)• K St. from 1st St. NE to Florida Ave. NE (<1 mile)• Irving St. from Warder St. NW to Michigan Ave. NE (1 mile)• New York Ave. NE from Florida Ave. to Bladensburg Rd.

(2.3 miles)

Existing Support for this Project This project has been reviewed at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:

☒ Move DC

See official Visualize 2045 Project Description Forms for more information about these projects.

See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.

Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 3

Page 7: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

DC BIKE LANES

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION

VISUALIZE 2045

How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan

Making bicycling safer and easier represents an expansion of transportation options (Goal 1). This will be advanced by implementing six bike-lane projects in the District. These projects are particularly supportive of the Priorities Plan’s call for improved non-motorized circulation within Activity Centers (Goal 2) to make bicycle travel more efficient and safer (Goals 3 and 4). The project further supports emissions reductions (Goal 5).

Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☐ Single Driver (SOV) ☐ Carpool/HOV ☐ Metrorail ☒ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☐ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter Bus ☐ Metrobus ☐ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other☐ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☒ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☒ Connects two or more Activity Centers☒ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☒ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☐ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☒ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☒ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☒ Greenhouse Gases

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel & Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☐ Long-haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☐ Intercity Bus

Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:

☐ Support Economic Vitality☒ Increase Safety for All Users☐ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☒ Protect and Enhance the Environment☐ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☒ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☐ Emphasize System Preservation☒ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☒ Enhance Travel and Tourism

Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):

☐Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☐ Traffic operational improvements☐ Public transportation improvements☐Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☐ Other congestion management strategies☒ Not applicable – This project does not increaseSOV capacity or is exempt from consideration ofalternatives.tion.

Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.

The information on this form was last updated on December 12, 2017.

Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045

September 7-October 7, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.

Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 4

Page 8: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

I-270 MANAGED LANESFrom I-495, Capital Beltway to I-70/US 40

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION VISUALIZE 2045

Basic Project Information

Project Length……………………………………34 Miles

Anticipated Completion………………………...2020-2025*

Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$4 billion

Submitting Agency………………………………Maryland DOT

Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….

☐ Federal ☐ State ☐ Local ☒ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

CEID…………………………………………….1186

FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.

Project Description The I-270 component of MDOT’s “Traffic Relief Plan” project will add two new managed lanes in each direction along I-270 between the Capital Beltway (I-495) and I-70/US 40.

*Actual completion year will depend on awarded contract.For air quality conformity modeling purposes, the completiondate is presumed to be 2025.

Existing Support for this Project This project has undergone review at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:

☒ Montgomery County 2017 Transportation Priority Letter

☒ MDOT/SHA Traffic Relief Plan

See official Visualize 2045 Project Description Form for more information about this project.

See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.

Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 5

Page 9: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

I-270 MANAGED LANES

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION

VISUALIZE 2045

How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan

The Priorities Plan called upon the region to use tolling and pricing mechanisms to manage road congestion and raise revenue. This project adds a key corridor to the region’s express lane network and will expand transportation choices (Goal 1) by adding lanes that will be dynamically managed to ensure free-flowing travel for drivers and express bus services. The 34-mile project connects numerous Activity Centers, which are the region’s primary engines for economic growth and opportunity (Goal 2).

Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☒ Single Driver (SOV) ☒ Carpool/HOV ☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☐ BRT ☒ Express/Commuter Bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☐ Bicycling ☐ Walking ☐ Other☒ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☒ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☒ Connects two or more Activity Centers☐ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☒ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☐ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☒ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☒ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☒ Greenhouse Gases

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel & Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☒ Long-haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☒ Intercity Bus

Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:

☒ Support Economic Vitality☒ Increase Safety for All Users☒ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☒ Protect and Enhance the Environment☒ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☒ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☐ Emphasize System Preservation☐ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☐ Enhance Travel and Tourism

Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):

☒Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☒ Traffic operational improvements☒ Public transportation improvements☒Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☒ Other congestion management strategies☐ Not applicable – This project does not increaseSOV capacity or is exempt from consideration ofalternatives.

See the Congestion Management Documentation form for more information.

Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.

The information on this form was last updated on December 14, 2017.

Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045

December 14, 2017-January 13, 2018 Comment on the projects before they are included in the federally required Air Quality Conformity Analysis

September 13-October 13, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.

Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 6

Page 10: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

I-495 MANAGED LANESFrom the American Legion Bridge to the Woodrow Wilson Bridge

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION VISUALIZE 2045

Basic Project Information

Project Length……………………………………22 Miles

Anticipated Completion………………………...2020-2025*

Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$4.3 billion

Submitting Agency………………………………Maryland DOT

Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….

☐ Federal ☐ State ☐ Local ☒ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

CEID…………………………………………….1182, 3281

FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.

Project Description The I-495 component of MDOT’s “Traffic Relief Plan” project will add two new managed lanes in each direction along the Capital Beltway between the Virginia end of the American Legion Bridge to the Maryland end of the Woodrow Wilson Bridge.

*Actual completion year will depend on awarded contract. Forair quality conformity modeling purposes, the completion dateis presumed to be 2025.

Existing Support for this Project This project has been reviewed at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:

☒ Montgomery County 2017 Transportation Priority Letter

☒ 2009 Prince George’s County Master Plan ofTransportation (MPO

☒ 1990 Heights Sector Plan

See official Visualize 2045 Project Description Form for more information about this project.

See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.

Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 7

Page 11: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

I-495 MANAGED LANES

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION

VISUALIZE 2045

How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan

New managed lanes on the entire 42-mile length of Maryland’s Capital Beltway will dramatically expand transportation choices (Goal 1) in the region by adding dynamically managed lanes to ensure free-flowing travel for drivers and for express bus services. Along with the I-270 Managed Lanes, this project significantly expands the region’s network of recent and forthcoming priced-lane projects. The project will connect numerous Activity Centers (Goal 2), the region’s focal points for economic growth.

Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☒ Single Driver (SOV) ☒ Carpool/HOV ☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☐ BRT ☒ Express/Commuter Bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☐ Bicycling ☐ Walking ☐ Other☒ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☒ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☒ Connects two or more Activity Centers☐ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☒ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☐ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☒ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☒ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☒ Greenhouse Gases

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☒ Long-haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☒ Intercity Bus

Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:

☒ Support Economic Vitality☒ Increase Safety for All Users☒ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☒ Protect and Enhance the Environment☒ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☒ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☐ Emphasize System Preservation☐ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☐ Enhance Travel and Tourism

Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):

☒Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☒ Traffic operational improvements☒ Public transportation improvements☒Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☒ Other congestion management strategies☐ Not applicable – This project does not increaseSOV capacity or is exempt from consideration ofalternatives.

See the Congestion Management Documentation form for more information.

Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.

The information on this form was last updated on December 14, 2017.

Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045

December 14, 2017-January 13, 2018 Comment on the projects before they are included in the federally required Air Quality Conformity Analysis

September 13-October 13, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.

Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 8

Page 12: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

US 301 WIDENING From the Governor Harry Nice Bridge to US 50/I-595

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION VISUALIZE 2045

Basic Project Information

Project Length……………………………………48 Miles

Anticipated Completion………………………...2045

Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$4.6 billion

Submitting Agency………………………………Maryland DOT

Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….

☒ Federal ☒ State ☐ Local ☒ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

CE ID…………………………………………….1004

FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.

Project Description Widen Crain Highway, US 301 from 4 to 6 lanes between the Governor Harry Nice Bridge at the Potomac River to the John Hanson Highway, US 50/I-595.

Existing Support for this Project This project has been reviewed at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:

☒ Pending

See official CLRP Project Description Form for more information about this project.

See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.

Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 9

Page 13: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

US 301 WIDENING

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION

VISUALIZE 2045

How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan

This 48-mile road widening project will expand transportation options for drivers, carpoolers and transit riders (Goal 1). The project will connect three Activity Centers (Bowie, Waldorf, and La Plata) (Goal 2) and will enhance freight movement (Goal 6).

Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☒ Single Driver (SOV) ☒ Carpool/HOV ☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☐ BRT ☒ Express/Commuter Bus ☐ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☐ Bicycling ☐ Walking ☐ Other☐ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☒ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☒ Connects two or more Activity Centers☐ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☐ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☐ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☐ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☒ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☒ Greenhouse Gases

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☒ Long-haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☒ Intercity Bus

Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:

☒ Support Economic Vitality☐ Increase Safety for All Users☒ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☐ Protect and Enhance the Environment☒ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☒ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☐ Emphasize System Preservation☐ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☐ Enhance Travel and Tourism

Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):

☐Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☐ Traffic operational improvements☐ Public transportation improvements☐Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☐ Other congestion management strategies

See the Congestion Management Documentation form for more information.

Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.

The information on this form was last updated on December 5, 2017.

Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045

September 7-October 7, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.

Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 10

Page 14: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

MD 201 WIDENING From I-495, Capital Beltway to US 1 North of Muirkirk Road

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION VISUALIZE 2045

Basic Project Information

Project Length……………………………………4.5 Miles

Anticipated Completion………………………...2045

Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$1 billion

Submitting Agency………………………………Maryland DOT

Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….

☐ Federal ☒ State ☐ Local ☒ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

CEID………………………………………….…….1204

FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.

Project Description This project will widen MD 201 to four lanes between north of I-495, Capital Beltway to Ammendale Way. It will also extend theMaryland Route 201 designation from its current end-point atPowder Mill Road to continue along Edmonston Road and OldBaltimore Pike. Additionally, it will construct a four-laneextension from Muirkirk Road to US 1. Bicycle and pedestrianaccess will be considered as part of this project.

Existing Support for this Project This project has been reviewed at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:

☒ 2017 Prince George’s County Priority Letter

☒ 2009 Prince George’s County Master Plan ofTransportation

☒ 1993 Subregion I Sector Plan

See official Visualize 2045 Project Description Form for more information about this project.

See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.

Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 11

Page 15: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

MD 201 WIDENING

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION

VISUALIZE 2045

How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan

This four-mile road widening of Edmonston Road/Old Baltimore Pike will expand travel options (Goal 1) by enhancing the facility for drivers and buses, while expanding options for walking and biking. It will connect the Greenbelt Activity Center to the Konterra Activity Center (Goal 2) and will promote local freight movement (Goal 6).

Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☒ Single Driver (SOV) ☐ Carpool/HOV ☒ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☐ BRT ☒ Express/Commuter Bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other☐ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☒ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☒ Connects two or more Activity Centers☐ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☐ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☐ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☐ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☐ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☐ Greenhouse Gases

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☐ Long-haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☐ Intercity Bus

Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:

☒ Support Economic Vitality☐ Increase Safety for All Users☒ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☒ Protect and Enhance the Environment☒ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☐ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☐ Emphasize System Preservation☐ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☐ Enhance Travel and Tourism

Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):

☐Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☐ Traffic operational improvements☐ Public transportation improvements☒Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☐ Other congestion management strategies

See the Congestion Management Documentation form for more information.

Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.

The information on this form was last updated on December 14, 2017.

Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045

September 7-October 7, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.

Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 12

Page 16: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

MD 97 RECONSTRUCTION From 16th Street to Forest Glen Road

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION VISUALIZE 2045

Basic Project Information

Project Length……………………………………<1 Mile

Anticipated Completion………………………...2025

Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$52 million

Submitting Agency………………………………Maryland DOT

Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….

☐ Federal ☒ State ☒ Local ☒ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

CLRP ID…………………………………………….2618

FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.

Project Description This project will reconstruct and widen MD 97, Georgia Avenue from six or seven lanes to seven or eight lanes on either side of I-495, Capital Beltway between 16th Street and Forest Glen Road.Sidewalks and accommodations for bicycles will be included whereappropriate.

Existing Support for this Project This project has been reviewed at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:

☒ Montgomery County 2017 Transportation Priority Letter

See official CLRP Project Description Form for more information about this project.

See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.

Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 13

Page 17: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

MD 97 WIDENING

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION

VISUALIZE 2045

How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan

Motivated by safety considerations (Goal 3), this project will widen approximately one mile of this heavily trafficked portion of Georgia Avenue crossing under the Beltway. It will provide pedestrian accommodations where feasible to promote access for all transportation modes (Goal 1), promote better circulation in the Silver Spring Activity Center (Goal 2), and facilitate local goods movement (Goal 6).

Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☒ Single Driver (SOV) ☒ Carpool/HOV ☒ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☐ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter Bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other☐ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☒ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☒ Connects two or more Activity Centers☐ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☐ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☐ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☒ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☒ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☒ Greenhouse Gases

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☐ Long-haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☐ Intercity Bus

Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:

☒ Support Economic Vitality☒ Increase Safety for All Users☒ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☒ Protect and Enhance the Environment☒ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☐ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☐ Emphasize System Preservation☐ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☐ Enhance Travel and Tourism

Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):

☐Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☐ Traffic operational improvements☐ Public transportation improvements☐Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☐ Other congestion management strategies

See the Congestion Management Documentation form for more information.

Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.

The information on this form was last updated on December 8, 2017.

Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045

September 7-October 7, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.

Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 14

Page 18: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

RANDOLPH ROAD BRT From US 29 to MD 355

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION VISUALIZE 2045

Basic Project Information

Project Length……………………………………10 Miles

Anticipated Completion………………………...2040

Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$102 million

Submitting Agency………………………………Montgomery County

Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….

☒ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☒ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

CEID…………………………………………….3662

FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.

Project Description This project will implement a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) route on Randolph Road between the White Flint Metro Station to US 29, Columbia Pike. The buses will run in mixed-traffic.

Existing Support for this Project This project has been reviewed at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:

☒ Countywide Transit Corridors Functional Master Plan

See official Visualize 2045 Project Description Form for more information about this project.

See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.

Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 15

Page 19: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

Randolph Road BRT

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION

VISUALIZE 2045

How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan

The Priorities Plan specifically called for cost-effective transit alternatives, like bus rapid transit (BRT), that approach the speed, frequency and reliability of heavy rail but at a fraction of the cost. This project is a component of a wider BRT network planned for Montgomery County that will expand travel options (Goal 1), connect Activity Centers (Goal 2), maximize the use of existing infrastructure without adding new capacity (Goal 4), and reduce emissions (Goal 5).

Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☐ Single Driver (SOV) ☐ Carpool/HOV ☒ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☒ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter Bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other☒ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☒ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☒ Connects two or more Activity Centers☒ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☒ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☒ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☒ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☒ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☒ Greenhouse Gases

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☐ Long-haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☐ Intercity Bus

Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:

☒ Support Economic Vitality☒ Increase Safety for All Users☐ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☒ Protect and Enhance the Environment☒ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☒ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☐ Emphasize System Preservation☒ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☐ Enhance Travel and Tourism

Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):

☐Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☐ Traffic operational improvements☐ Public transportation improvements☒Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☐ Other congestion management strategies☒ Not applicable – This project does not increaseSOV capacity or is exempt from consideration ofalternatives.

Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.

The information on this form was last updated on December 8, 2017.

Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045

September 7-October 7, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.

Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 16

Page 20: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

NORTH BETHESDA BRT Montgomery Mall Transit Center to White Flint Metrorail Station

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION VISUALIZE 2045

Basic Project Information

Project Length……………………………………3.5 Miles

Anticipated Completion………………………...2035

Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$115 million

Submitting Agency………………………………Montgomery County

Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….

☒ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☒ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

CEID…………………………………………….3663

FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.

Project Description This project will implement a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) route on Rock Spring Drive and Old Georgetown Road connecting the White Flint Metro Station with the Montgomery Mall Transit Center and the Rock Spring office park area. The buses will run on a dedicated transitway.

Existing Support for this Project This project has been reviewed at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:

☒ Countywide Transit Corridors Functional Master Plan

See official Visualize 2045 Project Description Form for more information about this project.

See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.

Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 17

Page 21: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

North Bethesda BRT

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION

VISUALIZE 2045

How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan

The Priorities Plan specifically called for cost-effective transit alternatives, like bus rapid transit (BRT), that approach the speed, frequency and reliability of heavy rail but at a fraction of the cost. This project is a component of a wider BRT network planned for Montgomery County that will expand travel options (Goal 1), connect Activity Centers (Goal 2), maximize the use of existing infrastructure without adding new capacity (Goal 4), and reduce emissions (Goal 5).

. Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☐ Single Driver (SOV) ☐ Carpool/HOV ☒ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☒ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter Bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other☒ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☒ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☐ Connects two or more Activity Centers☒ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☒ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☒ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☒ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☒ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☒ Greenhouse Gases

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☐ Long-haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☐ Intercity Bus

Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:

☒ Support Economic Vitality☒ Increase Safety for All Users☐ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☒ Protect and Enhance the Environment☒ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☒ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☐ Emphasize System Preservation☒ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☐ Enhance Travel and Tourism

Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):

☐Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☐ Traffic operational improvements☐ Public transportation improvements☒Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☐ Other congestion management strategies☒ Not applicable – This project does not increaseSOV capacity or is exempt from consideration ofalternatives.

Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.

The information on this form was last updated on December 8, 2017.

Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045

September 7-October 7, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.

Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 18

Page 22: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

MD 355 BRT From Bethesda to Clarksburg

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION VISUALIZE 2045

Basic Project Information

Project Length……………………………………22 Miles

Anticipated Completion………………………...2045

Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$1.08 billion

Submitting Agency………………………………Montgomery County

Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….

☒ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☒ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

CEID………………………………………………….3424

FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.

Project Description This project will implement a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) route on MD 355 between Bethesda and Clarksburg. The buses will run in a combination of dedicated transitway and mixed traffic.

Existing Support for this Project This project has been reviewed at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:

☒ MD 355 BRT Corridor Planning Study

See official Visualize 2045 Project Description Form for more information about this project.

See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.

Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 19

Page 23: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

MD 355 BRT

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION

VISUALIZE 2045

How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan

The Priorities Plan specifically called for cost-effective transit alternatives, like bus rapid transit (BRT), that approach the speed, frequency and reliability of heavy rail but at a fraction of the cost. This project is a component of a wider BRT network planned for Montgomery County that will expand travel options (Goal 1), connect Activity Centers (Goal 2), maximize the use of existing infrastructure without adding new capacity (Goal 4), and reduce emissions (Goal 5).

. Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☐ Single Driver (SOV) ☐ Carpool/HOV ☒ Metrorail ☒ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☒ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter Bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other☒ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☒ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☒ Connects two or more Activity Centers☒ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☒ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☒ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☒ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☒ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☒ Greenhouse Gases

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☐ Long-haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☒ Intercity Bus

Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:

☒ Support Economic Vitality☒ Increase Safety for All Users☐ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☒ Protect and Enhance the Environment☒ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☒ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☐ Emphasize System Preservation☐ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☐ Enhance Travel and Tourism

Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):

☐Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☐ Traffic operational improvements☐ Public transportation improvements☒Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☐ Other congestion management strategies☒ Not applicable – This project does not increaseSOV capacity or is exempt from consideration ofalternatives.

Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.

The information on this form was last updated on December 8, 2017.

Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045

September 7-October 7, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.

Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 20

Page 24: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

MD 650 BRT From Colesville Park-and-Ride to Eastern Avenue

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION VISUALIZE 2045

Basic Project Information

Project Length……………………………………8.4 Miles

Anticipated Completion………………………...2045

Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$285 million

Submitting Agency………………………………Montgomery County

Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….

☒ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☒ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

CEID………………………………………………….3672

FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.

Project Description This project will implement a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) route on MD 650 between the Colesville Park-and-Ride lot and Eastern Avenue. The buses will run in a combination of dedicated transitway and mixed traffic.

Existing Support for this Project This project has been reviewed at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:

☒ White Oak and Silver Spring Master Plans

See official Visualize 2045 Project Description Form for more information about this project.

See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.

Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and

HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN

October 17, 2018 Appendix B – Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 21

Page 25: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

MD 650 BRT

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION

VISUALIZE 2045

How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan

The Priorities Plan specifically called for cost-effective transit alternatives, like bus rapid transit (BRT), that approach the speed, frequency and reliability of heavy rail but at a fraction of the cost. This project is a component of a wider BRT network planned for Montgomery County that will expand travel options (Goal 1), connect Activity Centers (Goal 2), maximize the use of existing infrastructure without adding new capacity (Goal 4), and reduce emissions (Goal 5).

. Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☐ Single Driver (SOV) ☐ Carpool/HOV ☒ Metrorail ☒ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☒ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter Bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other☒ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☒ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☒ Connects two or more Activity Centers☒ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☒ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☒ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☒ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☒ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☒ Greenhouse Gases

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☐ Long-haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☐ Intercity Bus

Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:

☒ Support Economic Vitality☒ Increase Safety for All Users☐ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☒ Protect and Enhance the Environment☒ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☒ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☐ Emphasize System Preservation☐ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☐ Enhance Travel and Tourism

Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):

☐Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☐ Traffic operational improvements☐ Public transportation improvements☒Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☐ Other congestion management strategies☒ Not applicable – This project does not increaseSOV capacity or is exempt from consideration ofalternatives.☐ Not yet Available – Agencies have untilMarch 2, 2018 to complete the requiredCongestion Management Documentation.

Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.

The information on this form was last updated on January 15, 2018..

Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045

December 14, 2017-January 13, 2018 Comment on the projects before they are included in the federally required Air Quality Conformity Analysis

September 13-October 13, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.

Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002

Appendix B :Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 22

Page 26: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

VEIRS MILL ROAD BRT From MD 355, Rockville Pike to MD 97, Georgia Avenue

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION VISUALIZE 2045

Basic Project Information

Project Length……………………………………6 Miles

Anticipated Completion………………………...2030

Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$80 million

Submitting Agency………………………………Montgomery County

Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….

☒ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☒ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

CEID…………………………………………….3103

FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.

Project Description This project will implement a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line on Veirs Mill Road between the Rockville and Wheaton Metrorail stations. The project includes constructing queue jumps and installing transit signal priority at key intersections. The project also adds new transit service using articulated BRT vehicles, BRT stations with level boarding and off-board fare collection, and pedestrian and bike improvements.

Existing Support for this Project This project has been reviewed at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:

☒ Corridor Study Report, October 2017

See official Visualize 2045 Project Description Form for more information about this project.

See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.

Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 23

Page 27: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

VEIRS MILL ROAD BRT

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION

VISUALIZE 2045

How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan

The Priorities Plan specifically called for cost-effective transit alternatives, like bus rapid transit (BRT), that approach the speed, frequency and reliability of heavy rail but at a fraction of the cost. This project is a component of a wider BRT network planned for Montgomery County that will expand travel options (Goal 1), connect Activity Centers (Goal 2), maximize the use of existing infrastructure without adding new capacity (Goal 4), and reduce emissions (Goal 5).

Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☐ Single Driver (SOV) ☐ Carpool/HOV ☒ Metrorail ☒ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☒ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter Bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☐ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other☒ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☒ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☒ Connects two or more Activity Centers☒ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☒ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☒ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☒ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☒ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☒ Greenhouse Gases

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☐ Long-haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☐ Intercity Bus

Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:

☒ Support Economic Vitality☒ Increase Safety for All Users☐ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☒ Protect and Enhance the Environment☒ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☐ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☐ Emphasize System Preservation☐ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☐ Enhance Travel and Tourism

Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):

☐Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☐ Traffic operational improvements☐ Public transportation improvements☒Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☐ Other congestion management strategies☒ Not applicable – This project does not increaseSOV capacity or is exempt from consideration ofalternatives.

Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.

The information on this form was last updated on December 8, 2017.

Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045

September 7-October 7, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.

Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 24

Page 28: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

I-495 HOT LANESFrom Old Dominion Drive to the American Legion Bridge

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR CHANGE VISUALIZE 2045

Basic Project Information

Project Length……………………………………2 Miles

Anticipated Completion………………………...2025

Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$500 million

Submitting Agency………………………………Virginia DOT

Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….

☒ Federal ☒ State ☐ Local ☒ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

CEID……………………………………………..….2069

FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.

Project Description The I-495 HOT Lanes project has been included in the long-range transportation plan since 2005, and improvements between Old Dominion Drive and the Springfield Interchange were completed in 2012. The existing project includes extension of two HOT lanes in each direction from Old Dominion Drive to George Washington Parkway by 2025, and extension of one HOT Lane in each direction from George Washington Parkway to the American Legion Bridge by 2030. This proposed change would extend two HOT lanes in each direction from the George Washington Parkway to the American Legion Bridge by 2025. As a result of the collaboration between VDOT and MDOT, Maryland’s toll lanes project, which includes improving the capacity of the American Legion Bridge, will connect to an equivalent managed lane system at the Virginia state line.

Existing Support for this Project This project has been reviewed at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:

☒ Pending

See official Visualize 2045 Project Description Form for more information about this project.

See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.

Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 25

Page 29: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

I-495 HOT LANES

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR CHANGE

VISUALIZE 2045

How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan

This two-mile link connecting Virginia’s existing Capital Beltway HOT lanes and the forthcoming managed lanes on Maryland’s Capital Beltway will help to create a seamless regional network of express toll lanes, which was a key objective of the TPB’s Priorities Plan. The project will expand travel options in the region (Goal 1) for vehicles and for express bus services.

Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☒ Single Driver (SOV) ☒ Carpool/HOV ☒ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☐ BRT ☒ Express/Commuter Bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other☐ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☒ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☒ Connects two or more Activity Centers☐ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☐ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☐ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☐ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☐ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☐ Greenhouse Gases

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☒ Long-haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☐ Intercity Bus

Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:

☒ Support Economic Vitality☐ Increase Safety for All Users☒ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☒ Protect and Enhance the Environment☒ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☒ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☐ Emphasize System Preservation☒ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☐ Enhance Travel and Tourism

Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):

☐Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☐ Traffic operational improvements☐ Public transportation improvements☐Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☐ Other congestion management strategies

See the Congestion Management Documentation form for more information.

Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.

The information on this form was last updated on December 13, 2017.

Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045

September 7-October 7, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.

Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 26

Page 30: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

I-95 SB AUXILIARY LANEFrom VA 123 to VA 294

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION VISUALIZE 2045

Basic Project Information

Project Length……………………………………1.5 Miles

Anticipated Completion………………………...2028

Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$27.5 million

Submitting Agency………………………………Virginia DOT

Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….

☒ Federal ☒ State ☐ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

CEID…………………………………………….3664

FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.

Project Description This project will add one auxiliary lane to southbound I-95 between the Route 123 on-ramp and the Route 294 exit ramp.

Existing Support for this Project This project has been reviewed at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:

☒ Pending

See official Visualize 2045 Project Description Form for more information about this project.

See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.

Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 27

Page 31: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

I-95 SB AUXILIARY LANE

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION

VISUALIZE 2045

How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan

Enhancing safety (Goal 3) is the primary motivation for the addition of a southbound auxiliary lane on I-95 in Prince William County. The project will expand travel options (Goal 1) for drivers and bus riders, support freight movement (Goal 6), and enhance a connection to Woodbridge, which is an Activity Center (Goal 2).

Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☒ Single Driver (SOV) ☐ Carpool/HOV ☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☐ BRT ☒ Express/Commuter Bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☐ Bicycling ☐ Walking ☐ Other☐ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☒ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☐ Connects two or more Activity Centers☐ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☐ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☐ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☒ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☐ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☐ Greenhouse Gases

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☒ Long-haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☒ Intercity Bus

Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:

☒ Support Economic Vitality☒ Increase Safety for All Users☐ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☐ Protect and Enhance the Environment☐ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☐ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☐ Emphasize System Preservation☐ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☐ Enhance Travel and Tourism

Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):

☐Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☐ Traffic operational improvements☐ Public transportation improvements☐Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☐ Other congestion management strategies

See the Congestion Management Documentation form for more information.

Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.

The information on this form was last updated on December 13, 2017.

Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045

September 7-October 7, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.

Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 28

Page 32: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

US 15 WIDENING From Battlefield Parkway to VA 661 Montresor Road

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION VISUALIZE 2045

Basic Project Information

Project Length……………………………………3.6 Miles

Anticipated Completion………………………...2025

Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$33 million

Submitting Agency………………………………Virginia DOT

Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….

☒ Federal ☒ State ☒ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

CEID…………………………………………..…….3608

FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.

Project Description This project will widen US Route 15, James Madison Highway from two to four lanes between the northern interchange with Battlefield Parkway and VA 661, Montresor Road.

Existing Support for this Project This project has been reviewed at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:

☒ Pending

See official CLRP Project Description Form for more information about this project.

See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.

Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 29

Page 33: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

US 15 WIDENING

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION

VISUALIZE 2045

How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan

The James Madison Highway widening north of Leesburg will accommodate a variety of users (Goal 1) including drivers, bus riders, and bicyclists. The project will enhance safety (Goal 3) and support freight movement (Goal 6).

Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☒ Single Driver (SOV) ☐ Carpool/HOV ☐ Metrorail ☒ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☐ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter Bus ☐ Metrobus ☐ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☐ Walking ☐ Other☐ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☐ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☐ Connects two or more Activity Centers☐ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☒ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☐ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☐ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☒ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☒ Greenhouse Gases

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☒ Long-haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☐ Intercity Bus

Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:

☒ Support Economic Vitality☐ Increase Safety for All Users☒ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☒ Protect and Enhance the Environment☒ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☒ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☒ Emphasize System Preservation☐ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☒ Enhance Travel and Tourism

Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):

☐Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☐ Traffic operational improvements☐ Public transportation improvements☐Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☐ Other congestion management strategies

See the Congestion Management Documentation form for more information.

Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.

The information on this form was last updated on December 13, 2017.

Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045

September 7-October 7, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.

Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 30

Page 34: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

METRORAIL CAPACITY 8-Car Trains and Core Station Improvements

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION VISUALIZE 2045

Basic Project Information

Project Length……………………………………Entire System

Anticipated Completion………………………...2045

Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$5.4 billion

Submitting Agency………………………………WMATA

Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….

☒ Federal ☒ State ☒ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.

Project Description

This project will implement all 8-car trains running on the system during peak periods. Capacity improvements will be made to stations in the core to accommodate the trains. Supporting power infrastructure will be added to support the expansion.

Existing Support for this Project This project has been reviewed at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:

☒ Momentum

See official Visualize 2045 Project Description Form for more information about this project.

See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.

Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 31

Page 35: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

METRORAIL CAPACITY

Visualize2045.org

PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION

VISUALIZE 2045

How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan

The Priorities Plan urged the region to expand capacity on the existing transit system, and eight-car trains and core capacity improvements for Metrorail were among the few projects that the plan specifically identified. This project will help fulfill Metro’s pivotal role in providing transportation options in our region (Goal 1). It will help ensure Activity Centers are connected, the system is safe and maintained (Goal 3), existing infrastructure is effectively used (Goal 4), and our environment is protected (Goal 5).

Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☐ Single Driver (SOV) ☐ Carpool/HOV ☒ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☒ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter Bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☐ Bicycling ☐ Walking ☐ Other☒ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)

Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☒ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☒ Connects two or more Activity Centers☒ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers

Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☒ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety

Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☒ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☒ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists

Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☒ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☒ Greenhouse Gases

Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☐ Long-haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☐ Intercity Bus

Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:

☒ Support Economic Vitality☒ Increase Safety for All Users☒ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☒ Protect and Enhance the Environment☒ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☒ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☒ Emphasize System Preservation☐ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☒ Enhance Travel and Tourism

Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):

☐Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☐ Traffic operational improvements☐ Public transportation improvements☒Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☐ Other congestion management strategies☒ Not applicable – This project does not increaseSOV capacity or is exempt from consideration ofalternatives.

Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.

The information on this form was last updated on December 8, 2017.

Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045

September 7-October 7, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.

Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 32

Page 36: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSIONS, THE RTPP, AND FEDERAL PLANNING FACTORS

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 33

Page 37: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options

Promote a Strong Regional Economy, Including a Healthy Regional Core and Dynamic Activity Centers

Ensure Adequate System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety of the Transportation System

Enhance Environmental Quality, and Protect Natural and Cultural Resources

Support Inter-Regional and International Travel and Commerce

• Pleaseidentifyalltravelmodeoptionsthatthisprojectprovides,enhances,supports,orpromotes.• Doesthisprojectimproveaccessibilityforhistoricallytransportation-disadvantagedindividuals(i.e.,

personswithdisabilities,low-incomes,and/orlimitedEnglishproficiency?

TheCLRPProjectDescriptionformincludesasetofquestionsundertheRegionalPolicyFrameworksection.ThesequestionsareintendedtoexaminehowprojectssupportthegoalssetforthintheRegionalTransportationPrioritiesPlan(RTPP).ThesixRTPPgoalsaredescribedhereandarematchedupwiththecorrespondingquestionsfromtheCLRPProjectDescriptionform.TheresponsesprovidedbythesubmittingagenciesforallnewprojectsproposedforamendmenttotheCLRPthisyearhavebeensummarizedintheattachedtable,alongwiththeirresponsesastohowtheprojectssupportthefederalplanningfactorsprescribedunderMAP-21.

Goal 1

Goal 2

• DoesthisprojectbeginorendinanActivityCenter?• DoesthisprojectconnecttwoormoreActivityCenters?• Doesthisprojectpromotenon-autotravelwithinoneormoreActivityCenters?

• Doesthisprojectcontributetoenhancedsystemmaintenance,preservation,orsafety?

• Doesthisprojectreducetraveltimeonhighwaysand/ortransitwithoutbuildingnewcapacity(e.g.,ITS,busprioritytreatments,etc.)?

• Doesthisprojectenhancesafetyformotorists,transitusers,pedestrians,and/orbicyclists?

• Isthisprojectexpectedtocontributetoreductionsinemissionsofcriteriapollutants?• Isthisprojectexpectedtocontributetoreductionsinemissionsofgreenhousegases?

• Pleaseidentifyallfreightcarriermodesthatthisprojectenhances,supports,orpromotes.• Pleaseidentifyallpassengercarriermodesthatthisprojectenhances,supports,orpromotes.

Goal 3

Goal 4

Goal 5

Goal 6

Assessing CLRP Project Submissions against the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan and FAST Act

Question

Question

Question

Question

Question

Question

22

23

24

25

26

27

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 34

Page 38: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

SOVHOV

MetroRail

Commuter Rail

Streetcar/Lt. R

ail

BRTExp. B

us

Metrobus

Local Bus

OtherBicycling

WalkingDisa

dvantaged

GroupsBegin/End in AC

Connect ACs

Non-Auto w/in AC

Maintenance

Reduce Time

w/o Capacity

Enhance Safety

Criteria

Pollutants

Greenhouse Gases

Long Haul Truck

Local Delive

ry

Freight Rail

Freight Air

Air Passe

nger

AmtrakIntercity

Bus

MAJOR PROJECTS*

* Major projects are defined as changes to interstates, major arterials, and expressways or freeways with at-grade intersections, as well as dedicated transit facilities.

Estimated Cost

Projected Completion

TABLE 1VISUALIZE 2045 TECHNICAL INPUTS AND THE

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PRIORITIES PLAN GOALS

This matrix provides a visual summary of the responses provided by the relevant implementing agencies as to how their proposed projects support the goals identified in the RTPP.

1. Dedicated Bike Lanes

2. I-270 Toll Lanes $350 million

2018, 2023

2030

5. MD 201

6.MD 97

7. Randolph Road BRT

8.North Bethesda BRT

$1 billion

$52 million

2045

2025

9. MD 355 BRT

10. Veirs Mill Road BRT

11. I-495 HOT Lanes (North)

12. I-95 Southbound

$1.08 billion

$80 million

$500 million

$33 million

2045

2030

2025

2025

$28 million

$102 million

$115 million

2040

2035

3. I-95/I-495 Toll Lanes

4. US 301

$4.3 billion

$4.6 billion

2025

2045

13. US 15 $33 million 2025

Goal 1

Goal 2Goal 3

Goal 4Goal 5

Goal 6

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 35

Page 39: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

Economic Vitality

SafetyHomeland Security

Accessibilit

y/Mobility P

eople

Accessibilit

y/Mobility F

reight

Environment

Integration/Connectivi

ty

Management & Operatio

n

Preservatio

n

MAJOR PROJECTS*

* Major projects are defined as changes to interstates, major arterials, and expressways or freeways with at-grade intersections, as well as dedicated transit facilities.

Estimated Cost

Projected Completion

Federal Planning Factors

• Support the economic vitality of the metropolitanarea, especially by enabling global competitiveness,productivity,andefficienc .

• Increase the safety of the transportation systemfor all motorized and non-motorized users.

• Increase the ability of the transportation system tosupport homeland security and to safeguard the personalsecurity of all motorized and non-motorized users.

• Increase accessibility and mobility of people.• Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.• Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy

conservation, improve the quality of life, and promoteconsistency between transportation improvements andState and local planned growth and economicdevelopment patterns.

• Enhance the integration and connectivity of thetransportation system, across and between modes,for people and freight.

• Promoteefficien systemmanagement and operation.• Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.

TABLE 2VISUALIZE 2045 PROJECT SUBMISSIONSAND THE FEDERAL PLANNING FACTORS

This matrix provides a visual summary of the responses provided by the relevant implementing agencies as to how their proposed projects support the planning factors set forth in the FAST Act

1. Dedicated Bike Lanes

2. I-270 Toll Lanes

5. MD 201

6. MD 97

7. Randolph Road BRT

8.North Bethesda BRT

9. MD 355 BRT

10. Veirs Mill Road BRT

11. I-495 HOT Lanes (North)

12. I-95

3. I-495 Toll Lanes

4. US 301

13. US 15

$3.4 billion

2018, 2023

2030

$1 billion

$52 million

2045

2025

$1.08 billion

$500 million

$27.5 million

2045

2030

2025

2025

$28 million

$102 million

$115 million

2040

2035

$4.2 billion

$4.6 billion

2025

2045

$33 million 2025

$80 million

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 36

Page 40: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORMS

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 37

Page 41: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 36511. Submitting Agency: DDOT

2. Secondary Agency:

3. Agency Project ID:

4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☒ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ

☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program

☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs

5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other

6. Project Name: 17th Street NW Protected Bike LanePrefix Route Name Modifier

7. Facility:

8. From (☐ at):

9. To:

10. Description: Install two-way protected bike lane on 17th Street NW. This would replace the existing southbound-only conventional bike lane currently in place between New Hampshire Avenue NW and Massachusetts Avenue NW, and continue south to K Street NW. This project is intended to increase bicycle accessibility on a busy corridor for bicycling, and to provide an alternative facility to the congested 15th Street NW protected bike lane.

11. Projected Completion Year: 2018

12. Project Manager: Darren Buck

13. Project Manager E-Mail: [email protected]

14. Project Information URL:

15. Total Miles: 0.84 miles

16. Schematic (file upload):

17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):

18. Jurisdictions:

19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $150 cost estimate as of 11/9/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY

21. Funding Sources: ☐ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

Regional Policy Framework

Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.

22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options

Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Single Driver ☐ Carpool/HOV☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter bus ☐ Metrobus ☐ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other

☐ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)

17th St. NW New Hampshire Ave. NW K St. NW

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 38

Page 42: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

23. Promote Regional Activity Centers

☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☒ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?

24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

☒ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?

25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

☐ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☒ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?

26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?

27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Long-Haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air

Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☐ Intercity bus

28. Additional Policy Framework Response

Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.

Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:

a. ☐ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.

b. ☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.

i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☒ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:

c. ☐ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.

d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.

e. ☐ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.

f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.

g. ☐ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.

h. ☐ Promote efficient system management and operation.

i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.

j. ☐ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.

k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 39

Page 43: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☒ No

a. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?

☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;

☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands

Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions

a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☐ Yes; ☒ No

b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☐ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:

32. Capacity

a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☐ Yes; ☒ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,

or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):

☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required

☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)

☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile

☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange

☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles

☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction

☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.

c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.

Record Management 33. Completed Year:

34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator: Mark Rawlings

37. Created On: 11/17/2017

38. Last Updated by:

39. Last Updated On:

40. Comments:

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 40

Page 44: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 36531. Submitting Agency: DDOT

2. Secondary Agency:

3. Agency Project ID:

4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☒ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ

☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program

☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs

5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other

6. Project Name: Irving Street NE/NW Protected Bike LanePrefix Route Name Modifier

7. Facility:

8. From (☐ at):

9. To:

10. Description: Install protected bike lanes on Irving Street NE/NW. This bikeway would connect through McMillan-Old Soldier’s Home to Brookland. This project is intended to increase bicycle accessibility across a large crosstown area without any safe facilities for bicycling.

11. Projected Completion Year: 2018

12. Project Manager: Darren Buck

13. Project Manager E-Mail: [email protected]

14. Project Information URL:

15. Total Miles: 1 miles

16. Schematic (file upload):

17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):

18. Jurisdictions:

19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $250 cost estimate as of 11/9/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY

21. Funding Sources: ☐ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

Regional Policy Framework

Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.

22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options

Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Single Driver ☐ Carpool/HOV☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter bus ☐ Metrobus ☐ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other

☐ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)

Irving St. NE/NW Warder St. NW Michigan Ave. NE

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 41

Page 45: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

23. Promote Regional Activity Centers

☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☒ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?

24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

☒ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?

25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

☐ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☒ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?

26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?

27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Long-Haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air

Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☐ Intercity bus

28. Additional Policy Framework Response

Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.

Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:

a. ☐ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.

b. ☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.

i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☒ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:

c. ☐ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.

d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.

e. ☐ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.

f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.

g. ☐ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.

h. ☐ Promote efficient system management and operation.

i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.

j. ☐ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.

k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 42

Page 46: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☒ No

a. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?

☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;

☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands

Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions

a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☐ Yes; ☒ No

b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☐ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:

32. Capacity

a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☐ Yes; ☒ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,

or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):

☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required

☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)

☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile

☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange

☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles

☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction

☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.

c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.

Record Management 33. Completed Year:

34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator: Mark Rawlings

37. Created On: 11/17/2017

38. Last Updated by:

39. Last Updated On:

40. Comments:

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 43

Page 47: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 36521. Submitting Agency: DDOT

2. Secondary Agency:

3. Agency Project ID:

4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☒ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ

☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program

☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs

5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other

6. Project Name: K Street NW BikewayPrefix Route Name Modifier

7. Facility:

8. From (☐ at):

9. To:

10. Description: Install bike lanes (protected in places) along K Street NW/NE. This bikeway would connect Downtown, NoMa, and the Mt Vernon Triangle. This project is intended to increase bicycle accessibility on a busy corridor for bicycling.

11. Projected Completion Year: 2018

12. Project Manager: Darren Buck

13. Project Manager E-Mail: [email protected]

14. Project Information URL:

15. Total Miles: <1 mile

16. Schematic (file upload):

17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):

18. Jurisdictions:

19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $150 cost estimate as of 11/9/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY

21. Funding Sources: ☐ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

Regional Policy Framework

Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.

22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options

Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Single Driver ☐ Carpool/HOV☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter bus ☐ Metrobus ☐ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other

☐ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)

K St. NW 1st St. NE

7th St. NW

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 44

Page 48: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

23. Promote Regional Activity Centers

☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☒ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?

24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

☒ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?

25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

☐ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☒ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?

26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?

27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Long-Haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air

Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☐ Intercity bus

28. Additional Policy Framework Response

Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.

Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:

a. ☐ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.

b. ☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.

i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☒ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:

c. ☐ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.

d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.

e. ☐ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.

f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.

g. ☐ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.

h. ☐ Promote efficient system management and operation.

i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.

j. ☐ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.

k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 45

Page 49: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☒ No

a. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?

☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;

☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands

Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions

a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☐ Yes; ☒ No

b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☐ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:

32. Capacity

a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☐ Yes; ☒ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,

or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):

☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required

☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)

☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile

☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange

☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles

☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction

☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.

c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.

Record Management 33. Completed Year:

34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator: Mark Rawlings

37. Created On: 11/17/2017

38. Last Updated by:

39. Last Updated On:

40. Comments:

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 46

Page 50: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 36461. Submitting Agency: DDOT

2. Secondary Agency:

3. Agency Project ID:

4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☒ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ

☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program

☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs

5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other

6. Project Name: K Street NE Road Diet with Bike LanesPrefix Route Name Modifier

7. Facility:

8. From (☐ at):

9. To:

10. Description: Road diet to remove peak hour parking restrictions and provide full time parking along project limits. Peak hour restrictions are directional, 3 to 2 lane. Bicycle lanes will be provided between 1st St NE and 6th St NE. Reduction of one eastbound portal under rail (between 1st and 2nd Sts) to a provide two-way cycle track is currently under consideration with some opposition.

11. Projected Completion Year: 2018

12. Project Manager: Darren Buck

13. Project Manager E-Mail: [email protected]

14. Project Information URL:

15. Total Miles: <1 mile

16. Schematic (file upload):

17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):

18. Jurisdictions:

19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $30 cost estimate as of 11/9/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY

21. Funding Sources: ☐ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

Regional Policy Framework

Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.

22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options

Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Single Driver ☐ Carpool/HOV☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter bus ☐ Metrobus ☐ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other

☐ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)

K St. NE 1st St. NE

Florida Ave. NE

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 47

Page 51: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

23. Promote Regional Activity Centers

☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☒ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?

24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

☒ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?

25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

☐ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☒ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?

26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?

27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Long-Haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air

Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☐ Intercity bus

28. Additional Policy Framework Response

Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.

Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:

a. ☐ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.

b. ☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.

i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☒ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:

c. ☐ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.

d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.

e. ☐ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.

f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.

g. ☐ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.

h. ☐ Promote efficient system management and operation.

i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.

j. ☐ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.

k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 48

Page 52: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☒ No

a. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?

☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;

☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands

Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions

a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☐ Yes; ☒ No

b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☐ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:

32. Capacity

a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☐ Yes; ☒ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,

or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):

☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required

☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)

☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile

☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange

☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles

☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction

☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.

c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.

Record Management 33. Completed Year:

34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator: Mark Rawlings

37. Created On: 11/17/2017

38. Last Updated by:

39. Last Updated On:

40. Comments:

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 49

Page 53: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 36551. Submitting Agency: DDOT

2. Secondary Agency:

3. Agency Project ID:

4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☒ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ

☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program

☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs

5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other

6. Project Name: New York Avenue Streetscape & Trail ProjectPrefix Route Name Modifier

7. Facility:

8. From (☐ at):

9. To:

10. Description: The New York Avenue Streetscape and Trail Project is a 30% design plan to install streetscape improvements including lighting, new sidewalk connections, landscaping, traffic signals and signage and a raised cycletrack along New York Avenue NE from Florida Avenue NE to Bladensburg Road NE.

11. Projected Completion Year: 2023

12. Project Manager: Katherine Youngbluth

13. Project Manager E-Mail: [email protected]

14. Project Information URL: www.newyorkavenuestudy.com

15. Total Miles: 2.3 miles

16. Schematic (file upload):

17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):

18. Jurisdictions:

19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $27,200 cost estimate as of 11/9/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY

21. Funding Sources: ☐ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

Regional Policy Framework

Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.

22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options

Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Single Driver ☐ Carpool/HOV☒ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter bus ☐ Metrobus ☐ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other

☐ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)

New York Ave. NE Florida Ave. NE Bladensburg Ave. NE

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 50

Page 54: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

23. Promote Regional Activity Centers

☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☒ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?

24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

☒ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?

25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

☐ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☒ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?

26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?

27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Long-Haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air

Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☐ Intercity bus

28. Additional Policy Framework Response

Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.

Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:

a. ☐ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.

b. ☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.

i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☒ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:

c. ☐ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.

d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.

e. ☐ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.

f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.

g. ☐ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.

h. ☐ Promote efficient system management and operation.

i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.

j. ☒ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.

k. ☒ Enhance travel and tourism.

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 51

Page 55: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☒ No

a. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?

☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;

☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands

Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions

a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☐ Yes; ☒ No

b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☐ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:

32. Capacity

a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☐ Yes; ☒ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,

or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):

☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required

☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)

☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile

☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange

☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles

☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction

☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.

c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.

Record Management 33. Completed Year:

34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator: Mark Rawlings

37. Created On: 11/17/2017

38. Last Updated by:

39. Last Updated On:

40. Comments:

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 52

Page 56: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 36551. Submitting Agency: DDOT

2. Secondary Agency:

3. Agency Project ID:

4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☒ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ

☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program

☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs

5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other

6. Project Name: Pennsylvania Avenue SEPrefix Route Name Modifier

7. Facility:

8. From (☐ at):

9. To:

10. Description: This project will connect the Anacostia River Trail with bicycle lanes through Capitol Hill to the downtown core. In addition, it will provide cyclist access to bike lanes on Pennsylvania Ave west of the Capitol, and to the Metropolitan Branch Trail. It will reduce off-peak lane capacity from 6 to 4 lanes between 2nd and 14th Streets. During peak hours the existing 6 lanes will be utilized. Between 14th Street and Barney Circle, rush hour lane capacity will be reduced from 8 lanes to 6 lanes; the 6 lane off-peak capacity would be unchanged.

11. Projected Completion Year: 2018

12. Project Manager: Mike Goodno

13. Project Manager E-Mail: [email protected]

14. Project Information URL:

15. Total Miles: 1.3 miles

16. Schematic (file upload):

17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):

18. Jurisdictions:

19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $250 cost estimate as of 11/9/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY

21. Funding Sources: ☐ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

Regional Policy Framework

Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.

22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options

Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Single Driver ☐ Carpool/HOV☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter bus ☐ Metrobus ☐ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☐ Walking ☐ Other

☐ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals

Pennsylvania Avenue SE 2nd Street, Independence Avenue Barney Circle

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 53

Page 57: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)

23. Promote Regional Activity Centers

☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☒ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?

24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

☒ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?

25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

☐ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☒ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?

26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?

27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Long-Haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air

Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☐ Intercity bus

28. Additional Policy Framework Response

Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.

Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:

a. ☒ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.

b. ☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.

i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☒ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:

c. ☐ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.

d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.

e. ☐ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.

f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.

g. ☒ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.

h. ☐ Promote efficient system management and operation.

i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.

j. ☐ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.

k. ☒ Enhance travel and tourism.

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 54

Page 58: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☒ No

a. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?

☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;

☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands

Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions

a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☐ Yes; ☒ No

b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☐ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:

32. Capacity

a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☐ Yes; ☒ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,

or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):

☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required

☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)

☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile

☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange

☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles

☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction

☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.

c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.

Record Management 33. Completed Year:

34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator: Mark Rawlings

37. Created On: 11/17/2017

38. Last Updated by:

39. Last Updated On:

40. Comments:

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 55

Page 59: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information1. Submitting Agency: MDOT/State Highway Administration

2. Secondary Agency:

3. Agency Project ID:

4. Project Type: ☒ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☐ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ

☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program

☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs

5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other

6. Project Name: I-270 CorridorPrefix Route Name Modifier

7. Facility:

8. From (☐ at):

9. To:

10. Description: I-270 component of Traffic Relief Plan, to include two managed lanes in each direction, between I-495and I-70/US 40. Does not include I-270 Innovative Congestion Management improvements (CLRP3564).

11. Projected Completion Year: 2020-2025

12. Project Manager:

13. Project Manager E-Mail:

14. Project Information URL: http://www.mdtrafficreliefp3.com/

15. Total Miles: 34 miles

16. Schematic (file upload):

17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):

18. Jurisdictions:

19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $3,400,000 cost estimate as of 08/01/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY

21. Funding Sources: ☐ Federal ☐ State ☐ Local ☒ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

Regional Policy Framework

Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.

22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options

Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Single Driver ☒ Carpool/HOV☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☒ Express/Commuter bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☐ Bicycling ☐ Walking ☐ Other

☐ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)

I 270 I 495 Capital Beltway I 70 /US 40

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 56

Page 60: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

23. Promote Regional Activity Centers

☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☐ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?

24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

☒ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?

25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

☐ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☒ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?

26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?

27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Long-Haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air

Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☒ Intercity bus

28. Additional Policy Framework Response

Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.

Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:

a. ☒ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.

b. ☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.

i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☐ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:

c. ☒ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.

d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.

e. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.

f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.

g. ☒ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.

h. ☒ Promote efficient system management and operation.

i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.

j. ☐ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.

k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 57

Page 61: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☒ Yes; ☐ No

a. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?

☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;

☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☒ Wetlands

Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions

a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☒ Yes; ☐ No

b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☒ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:

32. Capacity

a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☒ Yes; ☐ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,

or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):

☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required

☒ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)

☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile

☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange

☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles

☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction

☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.

c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.

Record Management 33. Completed Year:

34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator:

37. Created On: 5/8/2006

38. Last Updated by: Matt Baker

39. Last Updated On: 11/21/2016

40. Comments:

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 58

Page 62: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

Project: MDOT I-495 and I-270 Traffic Relief Plan

1. Indicate whether the proposed project's location is subject to or benefits significantly from any of the

following in-place congestion management strategies:

a) X Metropolitan Washington Commuter Connections program (ridesharing, telecommuting, guaranteed

ride home, employer programs)

b) X A Transportation Management Association is in the vicinity

c) X Channelized or grade-separated intersection(s) or roundabouts

d) X Reversible, turning, acceleration/deceleration, or bypass lanes

e) X High occupancy vehicle facilities or systems

f) X Transit stop (rail or bus) within a 1/2 mile radius of the project location

g) X Park-and-ride lot within a one-mile radius of the project location

h) X Real-time surveillance/traffic device controlled by a traffic operations center

i) X Motorist assistance/hazard clearance patrols

j) X Interconnected/coordinated traffic signal system (along intersecting arterials)

k) _ Other in-place congestion management strategy or strategies (briefly describe below:)

2. List and briefly describe how the following categories of (additional) strategies were considered as full

or partial alternatives to single-occupant vehicle capacity expansion in the study or proposal for the

project.

a. Transportation demand management measures, including growth management and congestion

pricing

Several transportation demand management measures are currently in place in the I-495 and I-

270 corridors. Each local jurisdiction maintains growth management strategies in accordance with

Maryland law. In addition to the congestion management strategies currently in place in these

corridors (see Question 1 above), public transportation improvements are also underway including

the Purple Line light rail construction.

b. Traffic operational improvements

MDOT SHA has evaluated numerous operational improvements in these corridors to address

localized traffic and safety issues. These include extension of merge areas, auxiliary lanes, lighting

and signing improvements.

c. Public transportation improvements

Several public transportation improvements have been implemented and are currently underway in

these corridors, including upgrades to MARC commuter rail service, local and commuter bus service

improvements, and the ongoing implementation of the Purple Line light rail.

d. Intelligent Transportation Systems technologies

MDOT SHA’s Coordinated Highways Action Response Team (CHART) is a multi-jurisdictional,

multidisciplinary ITS program that supports freeways throughout Maryland. The comprehensive

and advanced traffic management system includes a state of the art command and control center

and satellite operations centers that function 24 hours-a-day, seven days a week. ITS technologies

in place throughout these corridors include real-time traffic surveillance, traffic incident

management, work zone management, traveler information services, road weather information,

and emergency response.

e. Other congestion management strategies

MDOT continues to support a comprehensive range of transportation strategies in these corridorsAppendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 59

Page 63: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

which have the highest levels of traffic demand in the State.

f. Combinations of the above strategies

3. Could congestion management alternatives fully eliminate or partially offset the need for the proposed

increase in single-occupant vehicle capacity? Explain why or why not.

I-495 and I-270 experience some of the worst congestion in the State. The demand is so great that

the facilities are congested not just during traditional rush hours, but for up to 10 hours daily and

periodically during weekends. Both state and local governments have developed and continue to

support a broad range of congestion management strategies in the project area; however, additional

roadway capacity is needed to provide congestion relief. Managed lanes, as proposed in this project,

will provide travelers with a reliable option for a faster trip, using pricing to manage the congestion in

the added lanes.

4. Describe all congestion management strategies that are going to be incorporated into the proposed

highway project.

MDOT expects to deliver these projects through public-private-partnerships (P3). Project goals of the

P3 agreements will be to provide solutions to reduce delay and improve predictability for vehicular

trips, provide improvements faster to the users, and encourage innovation to minimize impacts.

Specific elements of the project design, including congestion management strategies are not known at

this time; however, this document will be updates once the contracts are awarded.

5. Describe the proposed funding and implementation schedule for the congestion management

strategies to be incorporated into the proposed highway project. Also describe how the effectiveness

of strategies implemented will be monitored and assessed after implementation.

MDOT plans to initiate environmental review and seek Board of Public Works concurrence on the P3

procurement process in 2018. Selection of private partner(s) and environmental approvals are

anticipated in 2020, with construction beginning soon thereafter. MDOT expects that P3 delivery

approach will allow the projects to be implemented with no net State contribution over the totality of

P3 agreements. Once operational, the developer will be responsible for maintaining operations, safety

and maintenance conditions that will be established in the contract documents. MDOT will monitor

compliance with these commitments.

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 60

Page 64: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 11821. Submitting Agency: MDOT/State Highway Administration

2. Secondary Agency:

3. Agency Project ID:

4. Project Type: ☒ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☐ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ

☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program

☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs

5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other

6. Project Name: I-95/I-495 Corridor (South and East)Prefix Route Name Modifier

7. Facility:

8. From (☐ at):

9. To:

10. Description: I-95/I-495 component of Traffic Relief Plan, to include two managed lanes in each direction, betweenBaltimore Washington Parkway and Virginia State line/Potomac River (Woodrow Wilson Bridge).

11. Projected Completion Year: 2020-2025

12. Project Manager:

13. Project Manager E-Mail:

14. Project Information URL: http://www.mdtrafficreliefp3.com/

15. Total Miles: 22 miles

16. Schematic (file upload):

17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):

18. Jurisdictions:

19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $2,200,000 cost estimate as of 08/01/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY

21. Funding Sources: ☐ Federal ☐ State ☐ Local ☒ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

Regional Policy Framework

Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.

22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options

Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Single Driver ☒ Carpool/HOV☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☒ Express/Commuter bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☐ Bicycling ☐ Walking ☐ Other

☐ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)

I 495 Baltimore-Washington Parkway VA State Line/Potomac River (Woodrow Wilson Bridge)

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 61

Page 65: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

23. Promote Regional Activity Centers

☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☐ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?

24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

☒ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?

25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

☐ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☒ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?

26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?

27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Long-Haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air

Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☒ Intercity bus

28. Additional Policy Framework Response

Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.

Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:

a. ☒ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.

b. ☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.

i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☐ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:

c. ☒ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.

d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.

e. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.

f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.

g. ☒ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.

h. ☒ Promote efficient system management and operation.

i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.

j. ☐ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.

k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 62

Page 66: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☐ No

a. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?

☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;

☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands

Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions

a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☒ Yes; ☐ No

b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☒ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:

32. Capacity

a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☒ Yes; ☐ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,

or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):

☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required

☒ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)

☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile

☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange

☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles

☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction

☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.

c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.

Record Management 33. Completed Year:

34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator:

37. Created On: 5/8/2006

38. Last Updated by: Matt Baker

39. Last Updated On: 11/21/2016

40. Comments:

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 63

Page 67: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

Project: MDOT I-495 and I-270 Traffic Relief Plan

1. Indicate whether the proposed project's location is subject to or benefits significantly from any of the

following in-place congestion management strategies:

a) X Metropolitan Washington Commuter Connections program (ridesharing, telecommuting, guaranteed

ride home, employer programs)

b) X A Transportation Management Association is in the vicinity

c) X Channelized or grade-separated intersection(s) or roundabouts

d) X Reversible, turning, acceleration/deceleration, or bypass lanes

e) X High occupancy vehicle facilities or systems

f) X Transit stop (rail or bus) within a 1/2 mile radius of the project location

g) X Park-and-ride lot within a one-mile radius of the project location

h) X Real-time surveillance/traffic device controlled by a traffic operations center

i) X Motorist assistance/hazard clearance patrols

j) X Interconnected/coordinated traffic signal system (along intersecting arterials)

k) _ Other in-place congestion management strategy or strategies (briefly describe below:)

2. List and briefly describe how the following categories of (additional) strategies were considered as full

or partial alternatives to single-occupant vehicle capacity expansion in the study or proposal for the

project.

a. Transportation demand management measures, including growth management and congestion

pricing

Several transportation demand management measures are currently in place in the I-495 and I-

270 corridors. Each local jurisdiction maintains growth management strategies in accordance with

Maryland law. In addition to the congestion management strategies currently in place in these

corridors (see Question 1 above), public transportation improvements are also underway including

the Purple Line light rail construction.

b. Traffic operational improvements

MDOT SHA has evaluated numerous operational improvements in these corridors to address

localized traffic and safety issues. These include extension of merge areas, auxiliary lanes, lighting

and signing improvements.

c. Public transportation improvements

Several public transportation improvements have been implemented and are currently underway in

these corridors, including upgrades to MARC commuter rail service, local and commuter bus service

improvements, and the ongoing implementation of the Purple Line light rail.

d. Intelligent Transportation Systems technologies

MDOT SHA’s Coordinated Highways Action Response Team (CHART) is a multi-jurisdictional,

multidisciplinary ITS program that supports freeways throughout Maryland. The comprehensive

and advanced traffic management system includes a state of the art command and control center

and satellite operations centers that function 24 hours-a-day, seven days a week. ITS technologies

in place throughout these corridors include real-time traffic surveillance, traffic incident

management, work zone management, traveler information services, road weather information,

and emergency response.

e. Other congestion management strategies

MDOT continues to support a comprehensive range of transportation strategies in these corridorsAppendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 64

Page 68: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

which have the highest levels of traffic demand in the State.

f. Combinations of the above strategies

3. Could congestion management alternatives fully eliminate or partially offset the need for the proposed

increase in single-occupant vehicle capacity? Explain why or why not.

I-495 and I-270 experience some of the worst congestion in the State. The demand is so great that

the facilities are congested not just during traditional rush hours, but for up to 10 hours daily and

periodically during weekends. Both state and local governments have developed and continue to

support a broad range of congestion management strategies in the project area; however, additional

roadway capacity is needed to provide congestion relief. Managed lanes, as proposed in this project,

will provide travelers with a reliable option for a faster trip, using pricing to manage the congestion in

the added lanes.

4. Describe all congestion management strategies that are going to be incorporated into the proposed

highway project.

MDOT expects to deliver these projects through public-private-partnerships (P3). Project goals of the

P3 agreements will be to provide solutions to reduce delay and improve predictability for vehicular

trips, provide improvements faster to the users, and encourage innovation to minimize impacts.

Specific elements of the project design, including congestion management strategies are not known at

this time; however, this document will be updates once the contracts are awarded.

5. Describe the proposed funding and implementation schedule for the congestion management

strategies to be incorporated into the proposed highway project. Also describe how the effectiveness

of strategies implemented will be monitored and assessed after implementation.

MDOT plans to initiate environmental review and seek Board of Public Works concurrence on the P3

procurement process in 2018. Selection of private partner(s) and environmental approvals are

anticipated in 2020, with construction beginning soon thereafter. MDOT expects that P3 delivery

approach will allow the projects to be implemented with no net State contribution over the totality of

P3 agreements. Once operational, the developer will be responsible for maintaining operations, safety

and maintenance conditions that will be established in the contract documents. MDOT will monitor

compliance with these commitments.

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 65

Page 69: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 32811. Submitting Agency: MDOT/State Highway Administration

2. Secondary Agency:

3. Agency Project ID:

4. Project Type: ☒ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☐ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ

☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program

☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs

5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other

6. Project Name: I-95/I-495 Corridor (North and West)Prefix Route Name Modifier

7. Facility:

8. From (☐ at):

9. To:

10. Description: I-95/I-495 component of Traffic Relief Plan, to include two managed lanes in each direction, betweenthe Virginia State line/Potomac River (American Legion Bridge) and Baltimore Washington Parkway.

11. Projected Completion Year: 2025

12. Project Manager:

13. Project Manager E-Mail:

14. Project Information URL: http://www.mdtrafficreliefp3.com/

15. Total Miles: 20 miles

16. Schematic (file upload):

17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):

18. Jurisdictions:

19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $2,092,000 cost estimate as of 08/01/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY

21. Funding Sources: ☐ Federal ☐ State ☐ Local ☒ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

Regional Policy Framework

Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.

22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options

Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Single Driver ☒ Carpool/HOV☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☒ Express/Commuter bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☐ Bicycling ☐ Walking ☐ Other

☐ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)

I 495 VA State Line/Potomac River (American Legion Bridge) Baltimore-Washington Parkway

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 66

Page 70: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

23. Promote Regional Activity Centers

☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☐ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?

24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

☒ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?

25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

☐ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☒ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?

26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?

27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Long-Haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air

Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☒ Intercity bus

28. Additional Policy Framework Response

Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.

Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:

a. ☒ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.

b. ☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.

i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☐ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:

c. ☒ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.

d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.

e. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.

f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.

g. ☒ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.

h. ☒ Promote efficient system management and operation.

i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.

j. ☐ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.

k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 67

Page 71: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☐ No

a. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?

☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;

☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands

Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions

a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☒ Yes; ☐ No

b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☒ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:

32. Capacity

a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☒ Yes; ☐ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,

or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):

☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required

☒ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)

☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile

☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange

☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles

☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction

☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.

c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.

Record Management 33. Completed Year:

34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator:

37. Created On: 5/8/2006

38. Last Updated by: Matt Baker

39. Last Updated On: 11/21/2016

40. Comments:

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 68

Page 72: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

Project: MDOT I-495 and I-270 Traffic Relief Plan

1. Indicate whether the proposed project's location is subject to or benefits significantly from any of the

following in-place congestion management strategies:

a) X Metropolitan Washington Commuter Connections program (ridesharing, telecommuting, guaranteed

ride home, employer programs)

b) X A Transportation Management Association is in the vicinity

c) X Channelized or grade-separated intersection(s) or roundabouts

d) X Reversible, turning, acceleration/deceleration, or bypass lanes

e) X High occupancy vehicle facilities or systems

f) X Transit stop (rail or bus) within a 1/2 mile radius of the project location

g) X Park-and-ride lot within a one-mile radius of the project location

h) X Real-time surveillance/traffic device controlled by a traffic operations center

i) X Motorist assistance/hazard clearance patrols

j) X Interconnected/coordinated traffic signal system (along intersecting arterials)

k) _ Other in-place congestion management strategy or strategies (briefly describe below:)

2. List and briefly describe how the following categories of (additional) strategies were considered as full

or partial alternatives to single-occupant vehicle capacity expansion in the study or proposal for the

project.

a. Transportation demand management measures, including growth management and congestion

pricing

Several transportation demand management measures are currently in place in the I-495 and I-

270 corridors. Each local jurisdiction maintains growth management strategies in accordance with

Maryland law. In addition to the congestion management strategies currently in place in these

corridors (see Question 1 above), public transportation improvements are also underway including

the Purple Line light rail construction.

b. Traffic operational improvements

MDOT SHA has evaluated numerous operational improvements in these corridors to address

localized traffic and safety issues. These include extension of merge areas, auxiliary lanes, lighting

and signing improvements.

c. Public transportation improvements

Several public transportation improvements have been implemented and are currently underway in

these corridors, including upgrades to MARC commuter rail service, local and commuter bus service

improvements, and the ongoing implementation of the Purple Line light rail.

d. Intelligent Transportation Systems technologies

MDOT SHA’s Coordinated Highways Action Response Team (CHART) is a multi-jurisdictional,

multidisciplinary ITS program that supports freeways throughout Maryland. The comprehensive

and advanced traffic management system includes a state of the art command and control center

and satellite operations centers that function 24 hours-a-day, seven days a week. ITS technologies

in place throughout these corridors include real-time traffic surveillance, traffic incident

management, work zone management, traveler information services, road weather information,

and emergency response.

e. Other congestion management strategies

MDOT continues to support a comprehensive range of transportation strategies in these corridorsAppendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 69

Page 73: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

which have the highest levels of traffic demand in the State.

f. Combinations of the above strategies

3. Could congestion management alternatives fully eliminate or partially offset the need for the proposed

increase in single-occupant vehicle capacity? Explain why or why not.

I-495 and I-270 experience some of the worst congestion in the State. The demand is so great that

the facilities are congested not just during traditional rush hours, but for up to 10 hours daily and

periodically during weekends. Both state and local governments have developed and continue to

support a broad range of congestion management strategies in the project area; however, additional

roadway capacity is needed to provide congestion relief. Managed lanes, as proposed in this project,

will provide travelers with a reliable option for a faster trip, using pricing to manage the congestion in

the added lanes.

4. Describe all congestion management strategies that are going to be incorporated into the proposed

highway project.

MDOT expects to deliver these projects through public-private-partnerships (P3). Project goals of the

P3 agreements will be to provide solutions to reduce delay and improve predictability for vehicular

trips, provide improvements faster to the users, and encourage innovation to minimize impacts.

Specific elements of the project design, including congestion management strategies are not known at

this time; however, this document will be updates once the contracts are awarded.

5. Describe the proposed funding and implementation schedule for the congestion management

strategies to be incorporated into the proposed highway project. Also describe how the effectiveness

of strategies implemented will be monitored and assessed after implementation.

MDOT plans to initiate environmental review and seek Board of Public Works concurrence on the P3

procurement process in 2018. Selection of private partner(s) and environmental approvals are

anticipated in 2020, with construction beginning soon thereafter. MDOT expects that P3 delivery

approach will allow the projects to be implemented with no net State contribution over the totality of

P3 agreements. Once operational, the developer will be responsible for maintaining operations, safety

and maintenance conditions that will be established in the contract documents. MDOT will monitor

compliance with these commitments.

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 70

Page 74: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 10041. Submitting Agency: MDOT/State Highway Administration

2. Secondary Agency: MDOT/Maryland Transit Administration

3. Agency Project ID:

4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☒ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☐ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ

☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program

☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs

5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other

6. Project Name: US 301 South Corridor Transportation StudyPrefix Route Name Modifier

7. Facility:

8. From (☐ at):

9. To:

10. Description: Multi-modal corridor study to consider highway/transit improvements from the Potomac River to Mount Oak Road (US 50/US 301 interchange). Includes preparing appropriate environmental approvals for the recommended alternates. Project planning study and right-of-way preservation along US 301, from south of La Plata to Mount Oak Road.

11. Projected Completion Year: 2045

12. Project Manager:

13. Project Manager E-Mail:

14. Project Information URL:

15. Total Miles: 48 miles

16. Schematic (file upload):

17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):

18. Jurisdictions:

19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $4.644,000 cost estimate as of 08/01/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY

21. Funding Sources: ☒ Federal ☒ State ☐ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

Regional Policy Framework

Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.

22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options

Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Single Driver ☒ Carpool/HOV☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☒ Express/Commuter bus ☐ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☐ Bicycling ☐ Walking ☐ Other

☒ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)

US 301 Virginia State line/Potomac River (Harry Nice Bridge)

I 595 /US 50

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 71

Page 75: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

23. Promote Regional Activity Centers

☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☐ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?

24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

☐ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?

25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

☐ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☒ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?

26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?

27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Long-Haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air

Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☒ Intercity bus

28. Additional Policy Framework Response

Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.

Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:

a. ☒ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.

b. ☐ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.

i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☐ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:

c. ☒ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.

d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.

e. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.

f. ☐ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.

g. ☒ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.

h. ☒ Promote efficient system management and operation.

i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.

j. ☐ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.

k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 72

Page 76: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☐ No

a. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?

☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;

☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands

Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions

a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☒ Yes; ☐ No

b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☒ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:

32. Capacity

a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☒ Yes; ☐ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,

or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):

☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required

☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)

☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile

☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange

☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles

☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction

☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.

c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.

Record Management 33. Completed Year:

34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator:

37. Created On: 5/8/2006

38. Last Updated by: Matt Baker

39. Last Updated On: 11/21/2016

40. Comments:

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 73

Page 77: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 12041. Submitting Agency: MDOT/State Highway Administration

2. Secondary Agency:

3. Agency Project ID:

4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☐ Primary ☒ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☐ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ

☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program

☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs

5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other

6. Project Name: MD 201 WideningPrefix Route Name Modifier

7. Facility:

8. From (☐ at):

9. To:

10. Description: This project consists of the widening of MD 201 from north of I-95/I-495 at Cherrywood Lane to Ammendale Way from 2 or 3 lanes to 4 lanes. This project will also extend the designation of Maryland Route 201 from its current terminus at Powder Mill Road to continue along Edmonston Road and Old Baltimore Pike to US 1 north of Muirkirk Road, including the widening of Cedarhurst Drive from 2 to 4 lanes.

11. Projected Completion Year: 2045

12. Project Manager:

13. Project Manager E-Mail:

14. Project Information URL:

15. Total Miles: 4.5 miles

16. Schematic (file upload):

17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):

18. Jurisdictions:

19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $1,034,000 cost estimate as of 08/01/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY

21. Funding Sources: ☐ Federal ☒ State ☐ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

Regional Policy Framework

Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.

22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options

Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Single Driver ☐ Carpool/HOV☒ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☒ Express/Commuter bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other

☐ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)

MD 201 Edmonston Road, Old Baltimore Pike I 95 /I-495 US 1 North of Murkirk Road

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 74

Page 78: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

23. Promote Regional Activity Centers

☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☐ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?

24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

☐ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?

25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

☐ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☐ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?

26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

☐ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☐ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?

27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Long-Haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air

Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☐ Intercity bus

28. Additional Policy Framework Response

Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.

Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:

a. ☒ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.

b. ☐ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.

i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☐ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:

c. ☒ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.

d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.

e. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.

f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.

g. ☒ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.

h. ☐ Promote efficient system management and operation.

i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.

j. ☐ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.

k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 75

Page 79: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☒ Yes; ☐ No

a. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?

☐ Air Quality; ☒ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;

☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☒ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☒ Wetlands

Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions

a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☒ Yes; ☐ No

b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☒ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:

32. Capacity

a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☐ Yes; ☒ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,

or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):

☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required

☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)

☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile

☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange

☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles

☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction

☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.

c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.

Record Management 33. Completed Year:

34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator:

37. Created On: 5/8/2006

38. Last Updated by: Andrew Austin

39. Last Updated On: 11/30/2016

40. Comments:

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 76

Page 80: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 26181. Submitting Agency: MDOT/State Highway Administration

2. Secondary Agency: Montgomery County

3. Agency Project ID:

4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☐ Primary ☒ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☐ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ

☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program

☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs

5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other

6. Project Name: MD 97 CorridorPrefix Route Name Modifier

7. Facility:

8. From (☐ at):

9. To:

10. Description: The MD 97 Montgomery Hills project will evaluate safety and accessibility issues on MD 97. Widen from 6/7 to 7/8 lanes. Sidewalks and wide curb lanes to accommodate bicycles will be included where appropriate.

11. Projected Completion Year: 2025

12. Project Manager:

13. Project Manager E-Mail:

14. Project Information URL:

15. Total Miles: 1 mile

16. Schematic (file upload):

17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):

18. Jurisdictions:

19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $52,000 cost estimate as of 08/01/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY

21. Funding Sources: ☐ Federal ☒ State ☒ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

Regional Policy Framework

Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.

22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options

Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Single Driver ☒ Carpool/HOV☒ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other

☐ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)

MD 97 Georgia Avenue MD 390 16th Street MD 192 Forest Glen Road

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 77

Page 81: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

23. Promote Regional Activity Centers

☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☐ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?

24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

☐ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?

25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

☐ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☒ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?

26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?

27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Long-Haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air

Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☐ Intercity bus

28. Additional Policy Framework Response

Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.

Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:

a. ☒ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.

b. ☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.

i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☐ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:

c. ☒ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.

d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.

e. ☐ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.

f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.

g. ☒ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.

h. ☐ Promote efficient system management and operation.

i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.

j. ☐ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.

k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 78

Page 82: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☐ No

a. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?

☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;

☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands

Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions

a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☒ Yes; ☐ No

b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☒ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:

32. Capacity

a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☐ Yes; ☒ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,

or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):

☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required

☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)

☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile

☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange

☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles

☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction

☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.

c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.

Record Management 33. Completed Year:

34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator:

37. Created On: 1/7/2008

38. Last Updated by: Matt Baker

39. Last Updated On: 11/21/2016

40. Comments:

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 79

Page 83: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM

Basic Project Information 1. Submitting Agency: Montgomery County Department of Transportation2. Secondary Agency:

3. Agency Project ID: CIP 501318

4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☐ Bike/Ped ⛝ Transit ☐ CMAQ

☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program

☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs

5. Category: ⛝ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other

6. Project Name: Randolph Road Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) ProjectPrefix Route Name Modifier

7. Facility:Randolph Road

8. From (☐ at): US 29

9. To: MD 355

10. Description: This project provides for the detailed studies and construction related to a Bus RapidTransit (BRT) line on Randolph Road from the White Flint Metro Station on MD 355 to at Tech Road at US 29.Randolph Road is a commuter corridor with traffic and congestion in the westbound direction in the morningand the eastbound direction in the evening. Major activity centers include White Flint, Glenmont, and theemerging mixed-use center at White Oak. Randolph Road provides important linkages to other BRT corridorsand is important for the integrity of the BRT network. A mixed traffic transitway is recommended for thiscorridor. The County Council approved the Countywide Transit Corridors Functional Master Plan, anamendment to the Master Plan of Highways and Transportation, on November 26, 2013. The amendmentauthorizes the Department of Transportation to study enhanced transit options and Bus Rapid Transit for 10transit corridors, including: Georgia Avenue North, Georgia Avenue South, MD 355 North, MD 355 South, NewHampshire Avenue, North Bethesda Transitway, Randolph Road, University Boulevard, US 29, Veirs Mill Roadand Corridor Cities Transitway.

11. Projected Completion Year: 2040

12. Project Manager: Joana Conklin 13. Project Manager E-Mail: Joana.Conklin@montgomerycountymd,gov

14. Project Information URL: http://montgomeryplanning.org/transportation/highways/brt.shtm

15. Total Miles: 10 miles16. Schematic (file upload):17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):18. Jurisdictions: Montgomery County

19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): 102,000 cost estimate as of 10/25/2017

20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY

21. Funding Sources: ⛝ Federal ☐ State ⛝Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

Regional Policy Framework Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 80

Page 84: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.

22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options

Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.

☐ Single Driver ☐ Carpool/HOV⛝ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail⛝ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter bus ⛝ Metrobus ⛝ Local Bus⛝ Bicycling ⛝ Walking ☐ Other

⛝ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals (i.e.,persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)

23. Promote Regional Activity Centers

⛝ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?⛝ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?⛝ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?

24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

⛝Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?

25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

⛝ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit without building newcapacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?

⛝ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?

26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

⛝ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?⛝ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?

27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.

☐ Long-Haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirPlease identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.

☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☐ Intercity bus

28. Additional Policy Framework ResponsePlease provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.Advances goals of Master Plans in White Flint and White Oak.

Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:

a.⛝ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency.

b.⛝ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.

i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ⛝ No ii. If

yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 81

Page 85: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

c. ☐ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.

d.⛝ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.e. ☐ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.

f. ⛝Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.

g. ⛝ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.

h. ⛝ Promote efficient system management and operation.

i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.

j. ⛝ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.

k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.

Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ⛝ Noa. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?

☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;

☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands

Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions

a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ⛝ Yes; ☐ No

b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ⛝ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:32. Capacity

a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ⛝ Yes; ☐ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one, or

indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required

☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)

☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile

☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange

⛝ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles

☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction

☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.

c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.

Record Management 33. Completed Year:

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 82

Page 86: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator:37. Created On:38. Last Updated by:39. Last Updated On:40. Comments:

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 83

Page 87: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM

Basic Project Information1. Submitting Agency: Montgomery County Department of Transportation2. Secondary Agency:

3. Agency Project ID: CIP 501318

4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☐ Bike/Ped ⛝ Transit ☐ CMAQ

☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program

☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs

5. Category: ⛝ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other

6. Project Name: North Bethesda Transitway Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) ProjectPrefix Route Name Modifier

7. Facility:Rock Spring Drive / Old Georgetown Road

8. From (☐ at): Montgomery Mall Transit Center

9. To: White Flint Metrorail Station or Grosvenor Metrorail Station

10. Description: This project provides for detailed studies and construction related to the North BethesdaTransitway Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line. The North Bethesda Transitway connects the Rock Spring officepark area and the Montgomery Mall Transit Center to the Metrorail Red Line. Much of the right-of-way alongRock Spring Drive, Fernwood Road, and Tuckerman Lane is currently available through easements anddedications provided through the development review process. There are two alternative routes in theeasternmost portion of the corridor. One alternative is in dedicated lanes following Tuckerman Lane to theGrosvenor Metro Station. The other alternative would proceed north on Old Georgetown Road in a dedicatedlane to the western leg of Executive Boulevard, and then east on Old Georgetown Road in mixed traffic toRockville Pike and the White Flint Metro Station.

11. Projected Completion Year: 2035

12. Project Manager: Joana Conklin

13. Project Manager E-Mail: Joana.Conklin@montgomerycountymd,gov

14. Project Information URL: http://montgomeryplanning.org/transportation/highways/brt.shtm

15. Total Miles: 3.5 miles16. Schematic (file upload):17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):18. Jurisdictions: Montgomery County

19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): 115,150 cost estimate as of 10/25/2017

20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY

21. Funding Sources: ⛝ Federal ☐ State ⛝Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 84

Page 88: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

Regional Policy Framework

Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.

22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation OptionsPlease identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.

☐ Single Driver ☐ Carpool/HOV ⛝ Local Bus⛝ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail⛝ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter bus ⛝ Metrobus⛝Bicycling ⛝ Walking ☐ Other

⛝ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals (i.e.,persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)

23. Promote Regional Activity Centers

⛝ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☐ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?⛝ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?

24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

⛝ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?

25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

⛝ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit without building newcapacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?

⛝ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?

26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

⛝ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?⛝ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?

27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.

☐ Long-Haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirPlease identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.

☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☐ Intercity bus

28. Additional Policy Framework ResponsePlease provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.

Advances goals of Master Plans in White Flint and Rock Spring.

Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:

a.⛝ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.

b.⛝ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 85

Page 89: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ⛝ No ii. If

yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:

c. ☐ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.

d.⛝ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.e. ☐ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.

f. ⛝Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.

g. ⛝ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.

h. ⛝ Promote efficient system management and operation.

i. ⛝ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.

j. ⛝ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.

k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.

Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ⛝ Noa. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?

☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;

☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands

Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions

a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ⛝ Yes; ☐ No

b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ⛝ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:32. Capacity

a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ⛝ Yes; ☐ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one, or

indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):

☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required

☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)

☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile

☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange

⛝ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles

☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction ☐ Theconstruction costs for the project are less than $10 million.c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blank

Congestion Management Documentation Form.

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 86

Page 90: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

Record Management 33. Completed Year:

34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator:37. Created On:38. Last Updated by:39. Last Updated On:40. Comments:

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 87

Page 91: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 34241. Submitting Agency: Montgomery County Department of Transportation

2. Secondary Agency:

3. Agency Project ID:

4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☐ Bike/Ped ☒ Transit ☐ CMAQ

☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program

☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs

5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other

6. Project Name: MD 355 Bus Rapid TransitPrefix Route Name Modifier

7. Facility:

8. From (☐ at):

9. To:

10. Description: MD 355 includes numerous activity centers along the corridor planned for a high level of development that will support all-day travel throughout the corridor. It is also characterized by heavy congestion and high transit ridership potential. The corridor has several major existing and planned activity nodes, including Gaithersburg, Rockville, Twinbrook, White Flint, National Institutes of Health/Walter Reed National Medical Center, and the Bethesda CBD. This project will plan, design, and construct bus rapid transit service from Clarksburg to Bethesda. Project will be broken up into three phases with project completion in 2045: Phase 1 completion in 2025, Phase 2 in 2035 and Phase 3 in 2045.

11. Projected Completion Year: 2045

12. Project Manager: Corey Pitts

13. Project Manager E-Mail: [email protected]

14. Project Information URL: https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/BRT/md355project.html

15. Total Miles: 22 miles

16. Schematic (file upload):

17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):

18. Jurisdictions:

19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $1,080,000 cost estimate as of 10/31/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY

21. Funding Sources: ☒ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

Regional Policy Framework

Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.

22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options

Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Single Driver ☐ Carpool/HOV☒ Metrorail ☒ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☒ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other

☒ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)

MD 355

MD 410 East-West Highway

Clarksburg Road

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 88

Page 92: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

23. Promote Regional Activity Centers

☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☒ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?

24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

☒ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?

25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

☒ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☒ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?

26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?

27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Long-Haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air

Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☒ Intercity bus

28. Additional Policy Framework Response

Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.This project supports the transportation element of various community master plans along the MD 355 corridor.

Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:

a. ☒ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.

b. ☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.

i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☒ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:

c. ☐ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.

d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.

e. ☐ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.

f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.

g. ☒ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.

h. ☐ Promote efficient system management and operation.

i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.

j. ☐ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.

k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 89

Page 93: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

Environmental Mitigation

30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☒ Noa. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?

☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;

☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands

Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions

a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☒ Yes; ☐ No

b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☒ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:

32. Capacity

a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☒ Yes; ☐ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,

or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):

☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required

☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)

☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile

☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange

☒ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles

☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction

☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.

c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.

Record Management 33. Completed Year:

34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator:

37. Created On:

38. Last Updated by:

39. Last Updated On:

40. Comments:

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 90

Page 94: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

Basic Project Information CEID 3672

1. Submitting Agency: Montgomery County Department of Transportation

2. Secondary Agency:

3. Agency Project ID: CIP 501318

4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☐ Bike/Ped ☒ Transit ☐ CMAQ

☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program

☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs

5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other

6. Project Name: New Hampshire Avenue Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)

Prefix Route Name Modifier

7. Facility:

8. From (☐ at):

9. To:

10. Description: This project provides for the design and construction related to a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line on New

Hampshire Avenue from the Colesville park-and-ride lot to Eastern Avenue. New Hampshire Avenue is

a commuter corridor, with most traffic flowing southbound in the morning and northbound in the

evening. Activity centers are located at Takoma/Langley Crossroads and the emerging mixed-use

center at White Oak. Corridor recommendations, from north to south, include a mixed traffic transitway

from Colesville park-and-ride to Lockwood Drive, and dedicated lane(s) from Lockwood Drive to the

District line. The County Council approved the Countywide Transit Corridors Functional Master Plan, an

amendment to the Master Plan of Highways and Transportation, on November 26, 2013.

11. Projected Completion Year: 2045

12. Project Manager: Joana Conklin

13. Project Manager E-Mail: [email protected]

14. Project Information URL: http://montgomeryplanning.org/transportation/highways/brt.shtm

15. Total Miles: 8.4 miles

16. Schematic (file upload):

17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):

18. Jurisdictions: Montgomery County

19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $285,000 cost estimate as of 10/25/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY

21. Funding Sources: ☒ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

Regional Policy Framework

Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.

22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options

Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Single Driver ☐ Carpool/HOV☒ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☒ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other

MD 650 New Hampshire Avenue Colesville Park-and-Ride Lot Eastern Avenue

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 91

Page 95: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

☒ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)

23. Promote Regional Activity Centers

☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☒ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?

24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

☒ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?

25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

☒ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☒ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?

26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?

27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Long-Haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air

Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☐ Intercity bus

28. Additional Policy Framework Response

Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.Advances goals of Master Plans in White Oak and Silver Spring.

Federal Planning Factors

29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:a.☒ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and

efficiency.

b.☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.

i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☐ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:

c.☐ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.

d.☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.

e.☐ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.

f.☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.

g.☒ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.

h.☒ Promote efficient system management and operation.

i.☒ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.

j.☒ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 92

Page 96: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

k.☐ Enhance travel and tourism.

Environmental Mitigation

30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☒ Noa. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?

☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;

☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands

Congestion Management Information

31. Congested Conditions

a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☒ Yes; ☐ No

b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☒ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:

32. Capacity

a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☒ Yes; ☐ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,

or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):

☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required

☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)

☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile

☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange☒ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles

☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction

☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.

c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.

Record Management

33. Completed Year:

34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes

35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator:

37. Created On:

38. Last Updated by:

39. Last Updated On:

40. Comments:

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 93

Page 97: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 34241. Submitting Agency: Montgomery County Department of Transportation

2. Secondary Agency:

3. Agency Project ID: CIP 501318

4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☐ Bike/Ped ☒ Transit ☐ CMAQ

☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program

☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs

5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other

6. Project Name: Veirs Mill Road (MD 586) Bus Rapid Transit ProjectPrefix Route Name Modifier

7. Facility:

8. From (☐ at):

9. To:

10. Description: This project will implement a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line on Veirs Mill Road between Rockville and Wheaton Metrorail stations. The project consists of construction of queue jumps and installation of transit signal priority at key intersections, new transit service using articulated BRT vehicles, BRT stations with level boarding and off-board fare collection, and pedestrian/bike improvements.

11. Projected Completion Year: 2030

12. Project Manager: Joana Conklin

13. Project Manager E-Mail: [email protected]

14. Project Information URL: https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/BRT

15. Total Miles: 6.1 miles

16. Schematic (file upload):

17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload): Corridor Study Report, October 2017 (selection of Recommended Alternative)

18. Jurisdictions: Montgomery County

19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $80,000 cost estimate as of 10/31/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY

21. Funding Sources: ☒ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

Regional Policy Framework

Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.

22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options

Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Single Driver ☐ Carpool/HOV☒ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☒ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☐ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other

☒ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)

23. Promote Regional Activity Centers

☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?

MD 586 Veirs Mill Road

MD 355 Rockville Pike

MD 97 Georgia Avenue

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 94

Page 98: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☒ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?

24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

☒ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?

25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

☒ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☒ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?

26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?

27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Long-Haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air

Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☐ Intercity bus

28. Additional Policy Framework Response

Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.This project supports the transportation element of various community master plans along the MD 586 corridor.

Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:

a. ☒ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.

b. ☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.

i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☒ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:

c. ☐ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.

d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.

e. ☐ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.

f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.

g. ☒ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.

h. ☐ Promote efficient system management and operation.

i. ☒ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.

j. ☐ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.

k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.

Environmental Mitigation

30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☒ No

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 95

Page 99: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

a. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?

☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;

☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands

Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions

a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☒ Yes; ☐ No

b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☒ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:

32. Capacity

a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☒ Yes; ☐ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,

or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):

☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required

☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)

☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile

☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange

☒ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles

☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction

☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.

c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.

Record Management 33. Completed Year:

34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator:

37. Created On:

38. Last Updated by:

39. Last Updated On:

40. Comments:

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 96

Page 100: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 20691. Submitting Agency: VDOT

2. Secondary Agency:

3. Agency Project ID:

4. Project Type: ☒ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☐ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ

☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program

☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs

5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other

6. Project Name: I-495 HOT/HOV LanesPrefix Route Name Modifier

7. Facility:

8. From (☐ at):

9. To:

10. Description: The northern extension of VDOT’s I-495 High Occupancy/Toll (HOT) lanes has been in the long range transportation plan since 2005, as part of the larger project that resulted in creation of HOT lanes from the Springfield Interchange to Old Dominion Drive near Tysons. The plan is being amended to better coordinate with the I-495 HOT lanes project in Maryland. VDOT will extend the I-495 HOT Lanes from Old Dominion Drive north to the American Legion Bridge. The project will include two HOT lanes in each direction. VDOT anticipates this will be funded primarily by toll revenues, possibly through a pubic private partnership.

The existing CLRP includes extension of two HOT lanes in each direction from Old Dominion Drive to George Washington Parkway by 2025, and extension of one HOT Lane in each direction from George Washington Parkway to the American Legion Bridge by 2030. The plan is being amended to extend two HOT lanes in each direction from George Washington Parkway to the American Legion Bridge by 2025.

As a result of the collaboration between VDOT and MDOT, Maryland’s HOT lanes project, which includes improving the capacity of the American Legion Bridge, will connect to an equivalent managed lane system at the Virginia state line.

11. Projected Completion Year: 2025

12. Project Manager: Theresa DeFore

13. Project Manager E-Mail: [email protected]

14. Project Information URL:

15. Total Miles: 12 miles

16. Schematic (file upload):

17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):

18. Jurisdictions:

19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $500,000 cost estimate as of 12/11/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY

21. Funding Sources: ☒ Federal ☒ State ☐ Local ☒ Private ☒ Bonds ☐ Other

Regional Policy Framework

Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.

I 495 Capital Beltway I 95/ 395/495 – Springfield Interchange

American Legion Bridge

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 97

Page 101: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options

Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Single Driver ☒ Carpool/HOV☒ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☒ Express/Commuter bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other

☐ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)

23. Promote Regional Activity Centers

☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☐ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?

24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

☐ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?

25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

☐ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☐ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?

26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

☐ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☐ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?

27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Long-Haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air

Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☒ Intercity bus

28. Additional Policy Framework Response

Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.

Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:

a. ☒ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.

b. ☐ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.

i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☐ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:

c. ☒ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.

d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.

e. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.

f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 98

Page 102: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

g. ☒ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.

h. ☐ Promote efficient system management and operation.

i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.

j. ☒ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.

k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.

Environmental Mitigation

30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☒ Noa. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?

☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;

☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands

Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions

a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☒ Yes; ☐ No

b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☒ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:

32. Capacity

a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☒ Yes; ☐ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,

or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):

☒ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required

☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)

☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile

☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange

☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles

☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction

☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.

c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.

Record Management 33. Completed Year:

34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator:

37. Created On: 12/13/2006

38. Last Updated by: Norman Whitaker

39. Last Updated On: 12/12/2017

40. Comments:

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 99

Page 103: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 36671. Submitting Agency: VDOT

2. Secondary Agency: Prince William County DPW

3. Agency Project ID:

4. Project Type: ☒ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☐ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ

☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program

☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs

5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other

6. Project Name: I-95 Auxiliary Lane, between Route 123, Exit 160 and Route 294, Exit 158Prefix Route Name Modifier

7. Facility:

8. From (☐ at):

9. To:

10. Description: This project includes adding an auxiliary lane on southbound Interstate 95, from the Route 123 entrance ramp, which will merge into an existing lane before the Route 294 exit ramp. The length of the project is approximately 1.4 miles.

11. Projected Completion Year: 2028

12. Project Manager: Ricardo Canizales

13. Project Manager E-Mail: [email protected]

14. Project Information URL:

15. Total Miles: 1.4 miles

16. Schematic (file upload):

17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):

18. Jurisdictions:

19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $27,500 cost estimate as of 10/26/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY

21. Funding Sources: ☒ Federal ☒ State ☐ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

Regional Policy Framework

Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.

22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options

Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Single Driver ☐ Carpool/HOV☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☒ Express/Commuter bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☐ Bicycling ☐ Walking ☐ Other

☐ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)

23. Promote Regional Activity Centers

☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?

I 95 VA 123 VA 294

Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 100

Page 104: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

☐ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☐ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?

24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

☐ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?

25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

☒ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☐ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?

26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

☐ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☐ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?

27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Long-Haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air

Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☒ Intercity bus

28. Additional Policy Framework Response

Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.The construction of an auxiliary lane on Interstate 95 between Route 123, Exit 160 and Route 294, Exit 158 will improveoperations between two major interstate interchanges. This project will address congestion and improve access to boththe Route 123 and Route 294 exits. The project is in line with NVTA’s Regional TransAction Goal by investing intransportation improvements that reduces congestion and crowding experienced by travelers in the region.

Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:

a. ☒ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.

b. ☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.

i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☒ Yes; ☐ No

ii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem: Vehicles are forced tomerge in a short distance.

c. ☐ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.

d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.

e. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.

f. ☐ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.

g. ☐ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.

h. ☐ Promote efficient system management and operation.

i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.

j. ☐ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.

October 17, 2018 Appendix B – Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 101

Page 105: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.

Environmental Mitigation

30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☒ Noa. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?

☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;

☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands

Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions

a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☒ Yes; ☐ No

b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☒ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:

32. Capacity

a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☒ Yes; ☐ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,

or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):

☒ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required

☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)

☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile

☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange

☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles

☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction

☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.

c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.

Record Management 33. Completed Year:

34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator: Elizabeth Scullin

37. Created On: 12/11/2017

38. Last Updated by: Cina Dabestani

39. Last Updated On: 12/12/2017

40. Comments:

October 17, 2018 Appendix B – Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 102

Page 106: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 36081. Submitting Agency: VDOT

2. Secondary Agency: Loudoun County

3. Agency Project ID:

4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☒ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☐ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ

☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program

☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs

5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other

6. Project Name: Route 15 WideningPrefix Route Name Modifier

7. Facility:

8. From (☐ at):

9. To:

10. Description: Reconstruction with added capacity. This two lane road will be widened to four lanes.

11. Projected Completion Year: 2025

12. Project Manager: James Zeller

13. Project Manager E-Mail: [email protected]

14. Project Information URL: www.loudoun.gov/Route15

15. Total Miles: 3.6 miles

16. Schematic (file upload):

17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):

18. Jurisdictions: Loudoun County

19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $33 million cost estimate as of 10/17/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY

21. Funding Sources: ☒ Federal ☒ State ☒ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other

Regional Policy Framework

Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.

22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options

Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Single Driver ☐ Carpool/HOV☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter bus ☐ Metrobus ☐ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☐ Walking ☐ Other

☐ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)

23. Promote Regional Activity Centers

☐ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☐ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?

US 15 James Madison Highway Battlefield Parkway

VA 661 Montresor Road

October 17, 2018 Appendix B – Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 103

Page 107: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

☐ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?

24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

☒ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?

25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

☐ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☐ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?

26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?

27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce

Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Long-Haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air

Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☐ Intercity bus

28. Additional Policy Framework Response

Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.The project will improve regional north-south mobility between Virginia and Maryland.

Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:

a. ☒ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.

b. ☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.

i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☐ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:

c. ☒ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.

d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.

e. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.

f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.

g. ☒ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.

h. ☒ Promote efficient system management and operation.

i. ☒ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.

j. ☒ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.

k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.

October 17, 2018 Appendix B – Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 104

Page 108: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)

Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☒ Yes; ☐ No

a. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?

☒ Air Quality; ☒ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☒ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;

☐ Energy; ☒ Noise; ☒ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☒ Wetlands

Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions

a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☒ Yes; ☐ No

b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☒ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:

32. Capacity

a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☒ Yes; ☐ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,

or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):

☒ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required

☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)

☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile

☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange

☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles

☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction

☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.

c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.

Record Management 33. Completed Year:

34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator: Cina Dabestani

37. Created On: 10/30/2017

38. Last Updated by: Regina Moore

39. Last Updated On: 12/12/2017

40. Comments:

October 17, 2018 Appendix B – Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 105

Page 109: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

ALL PROJECTS IN THE CONSTRAINED ELEMENT OF VISUALIZE 2045

October 17, 2018 Appendix B – Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 106

Page 110: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

District of ColumbiaDDOT

System MaintenanceInterstate Projects

Rehabilitation of I-395 HOV Bridge over Potomac River

Facility: I 395 HOV

From: East Potomac Bank

To: West Potomac Bank

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $39,250

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3305

Rehabilitation of I-66 Ramp to Whitehurst Freeway over Potomac Pkwy and Rock Creek (Bridge No.1303)

Facility: I-66 Ramp

From:

To: Whitehurst Freeway over Potomac Pkwy and Rock Creek Bridge

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $6,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3457

OtherInterstate Projects

Return to L’Enfant

Facility: I 395 Center Leg Freeway

From: Massachusetts Avenue, NW

To: E St., NW (Between 2nd & 3rd)

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $27,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2813

System ExpansionPrimary Projects

Anacostia Waterfront Initiative

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $65,100

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1589

South Capitol Street

Facility:

From: Independence Avenue

To: Martin Luther King Jr., Boulevard

Complete In: 2024

Cost: $822,500

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1570

St. Elizabeth Access

Facility: Several locations

From:

To:

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $200,200

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2860

StudyPrimary Projects

Bus Only Lane (Planning and Implementation)

Facility: H & I Street Bus only Lanes

From:

To:

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $5,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3196

Operational ProgramPrimary Projects

Audit and Compliance

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $0

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3195

OtherPrimary Projects

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 107

Page 111: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Reconstruct New Jersey Avenue NW from H Street to N Street

Facility: New Jersey Avenue NW

From: H Street NW

To: N Street NW

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $15,500

Agency Proj. ID: SR055A

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3399

System ExpansionSecondary Projects

Southern Avenue

Facility: Southern Avenue

From: Branch Avenue

To: Naylor Road, S.E.

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $4,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2867

System MaintenanceSecondary Projects

Mid City East

Facility: Bates- Hanover, Bloomingdale, Eckington, Edgewood, LeDroit Park, Sursum Corda, and T

From: Bates- Hanover

To: Truxton Circle

Complete In: 2017

Cost: $3,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3297

Neighborhood Roadside Improvements

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $3,900

Agency Proj. ID: ED019A, SR

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3397

Reconstruction of 18th Street, NW from Virginia Ave to Connecticut Ave/M Street

Facility: 18th Street NW

From: Virginia Ave NW

To: Connecticut Ave NW / M Street NW

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $20,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3452

Reconstruction of Harvard Street NW from 16th Street NW to Georgia Ave NW

Facility: Harvard Street NW

From: 16th Street NW

To: Georgia Avenue NW

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $1,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3488

Reconstruction of Kenyon Street NW from Park Place to 13th Street

Facility: Kenyon Street NW

From: Park Place NW

To: 13th Street NW

Complete In: 2021

Cost: $6,500

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3455

Reconstruction of Ward II

Facility: Ward II- 4 Locations

From:

To: Ward II

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $1,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3454

Rehabilitation of Eastern Avenue NE from New Hamphire Ave, NE to Whitter Street NW

Facility: Eastern Avenue NE

From: New Hampshire Ave NE

To: Whitter Street NW

Complete In: 2021

Cost: $4,324

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3462

Safety Improvements of 22nd and I NW

Facility: Pennsylvania Ave. NW

From: 22nd Street NW

To: I Street

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $400

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3505

StudySecondary Projects

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 108

Page 112: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

C Street NE Implementation

Facility: C St NE/North Carolina Ave NE

From: Oklahoma Avenue

To: 14th Street NE

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $14,500

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3077

Florida Avenue Transportation Study

Facility: Florida Avenue, NE

From: 1St Street, NE

To: H Street, NE

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $12,000

Agency Proj. ID: ZU033A

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3382

Operational ProgramSecondary Projects

Livability Program

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $0

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2888

OtherSecondary Projects

Maryland Avenue Pedestrian Safety Project

Facility: Maryland Ave. NE

From: Constitution Avenue

To: 15th Street

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $18,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3075

Southeast Boulevard/Barney Circle Environmental Assessment

Facility: Southeast Boulevard

From: Barney Circle

To: 11th St SE

Complete In: 2017

Cost: $2,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3511

System ExpansionBike/Ped Projects

Lincoln Connector Trail

Facility: Bladensburg RD SE on west

From: Via Lincoln to New York Ave

To:

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $200

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3510

Metropolitan Branch Trail

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2021

Cost: $12,500

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1166

National Recreational Trails

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $180

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1170

Rock Creek Park Trail

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $10,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1168

System MaintenanceBike/Ped Projects

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 109

Page 113: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

New York Avenue Streetscape & Trail Project

Facility: 50 New York Avenue NE

From: Florida Avenue NE

To: Bladensburg Avenue NE

Complete In: 2023

Cost: $27,200

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3655

Oxon Run Trail Restoration

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2017

Cost: $14,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1465

Reconstruction/Rehabilitation of Superstructure and Substructure Arizona Ave NW

Facility: Pedestrian Bridge and Trail at Arizona Ave NW

From: Nebraska Ave NW

To: Galena Ave NW

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $5,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3539

Operational ProgramBike/Ped Projects

District-wide Bicycle and Pedestrian Management Program

Facility:

From: Bicycle racks, lanes and bicycle signs

To:

Complete In: 2024

Cost: $800

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1171

Safe Routes to School

Facility: Safe Routes to School

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $6,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1352

OtherBike/Ped Projects

17th Street NW Protected Bike Lane

Facility: 17th Street

From: New Hampshire Avenue

To: K Street

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $150

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3651

Irving Street NE/NW Protected Bike Lane

Facility: Irving Street

From: Warder Street

To: Michigan Avenue

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $250

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3653

K Street NW Bikeway

Facility: K Street

From: 7th Street

To: 1st Street

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $150

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3652

Klingle Trail

Facility: Klingle Road

From: Woodley Road

To: Porter Street

Complete In: 2017

Cost: $11,500

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1122

Pennsylvania Avenue SE

Facility: Pennsylvania Avenue SE

From: 2nd Street, Independence Avenue

To: Barney Circle

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $250

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3654

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 110

Page 114: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

South Capitol Street Trail

Facility: South Capitol Street

From: Firth Sterling Avenue SE

To: Southern Avenue Maryland state line

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $10,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3241

System ExpansionBridge Projects

Anacostia Freeway Bridges over Nicholson Street SE

Facility: Anacostia Freeway Bridge at Nicholson Street SE

From:

To:

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $16,500

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3191

System MaintenanceBridge Projects

Monroe Street, NE Bridge over CSX & WMATA

Facility: Monroe St.

From:

To:

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $15,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3294

Rehabilitation of 14th Street, SW Bridge over Streetcar Terminal

Facility: 14th Street SW Bridge

From:

To:

Complete In: 2024

Cost: $6,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3489

Rehabilitation of 16th St Bridge over Piney Branch Rd, NW (Bridge No. 0022)

Facility: 16th St Bridge NW

From:

To: over Piney Branch Rd, NW.

Complete In: 2021

Cost: $15,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3459

Rehabilitation of K Street NW Bridge, over Whitehurst Freeway Ramp (Bridge No. 1304)

Facility:

From:

To: over Whitehurst Freeway Ramp

Complete In: 2026

Cost: $7,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3458

Roadway and Bridge Improvement on Southern Avenue and Winkle Doodle Branch Bridge

Facility: Southern Avenue

From: South Capitol Street

To: 23rd Street

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $15,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2943

Tunnel Asset Management

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $0

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2890

StudyBridge Projects

H Street Bridge over Amtrak

Facility:

From: 3rd Street NE

To: North Capitol NE

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $230,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2925

Long Bridge Study

Facility: Long Bridge

From: Virginia Interface

To: 12th Street, SW

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $4,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2807

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 111

Page 115: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Operational ProgramEnhancement Projects

Transportation Alternatives Program

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $11,200

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1144

System MaintenanceITS Projects

Traffic Signal LED Replacement

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $0

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3242

Operational ProgramITS Projects

Traffic Control Center

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $0

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2555

Traffic Operations Improvements Citywide

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $126,532

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1151

OtherITS Projects

Construction of DDOT 511 System

Facility: Citywide

From:

To:

Complete In:

Cost: $500

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3518

System ExpansionOther Projects

Arboretum Bridge and Trail

Facility: Anacostia River Walk Trail east side over river to west side of river ar the Arboretum

From:

To:

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $1,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3509

System MaintenanceOther Projects

Asset Condition Assessment

Facility:

From:

To: District Wide

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $3,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2549

Local Sidewalk and Street Improvements Citywide

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $60,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1158

Rehabilitation of Anacostia Freeway Bridges over South Capitol Street (Bridge No. 1016 & 1017)

Facility: Anacostia Freeway over South Capitol Street

From:

To:

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $18,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3211

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 112

Page 116: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Roadside Improvements Citywide

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $37,955

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1157

Roadway Reconstruction Citywide

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $0

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1150

Streetscape

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In:

Cost: $12,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1519

Traffic Signal Maintenance

Facility:

From:

To: Citywide

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $0

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2553

StudyOther Projects

Cleveland Park Study

Facility: Connecticut Ave. NW

From: Porter Street NW

To: Macomb Street NW

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $1,000

Agency Proj. ID: PM0D7A

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3380

Metro Station Walkshed Connections Study

Facility: Metro Stations Citywide

From:

To:

Complete In: 2017

Cost: $200

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3506

South Dakota Ave NE and New York Ave NE Interchange Improvement Study

Facility: South Dakota Ave.

From: New York Ave NE

To: 33rd PL NE

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $400

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3508

Walter Reed Campus

Facility: Main Drive NW

From: Georgia Avenue

To: 16th Street NW

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $6,600

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3078

Operational ProgramOther Projects

Performance-Based Parking Pricing

Facility:

From: Citywide

To:

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $400

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1002

Planning and Management Systems

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $19,900

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1155

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 113

Page 117: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Safety Improvements

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $101,822

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1148

Traffic Congestion Mitigation

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $1,500

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1470

OtherOther Projects

Streetscape of Connecticut Ave. NW from Dupont Circle to California Street

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $1,000

Agency Proj. ID: New

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3504

Urban Forestry Program

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $60,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2548

Operational ProgramTERMs Projects

Transportation Emissions Reduction Measures

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $2,328

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1153

System MaintenanceMaintenance Projects

Bloomingdale/LeDroit Park Medium Term Flood Mitigation Project

Facility: Bloomingdale/LeDroit Park

From:

To:

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $7,500

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3298

Bridge Replacement/Rehabilitation Program

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $633,739

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1143

Citywide Pump Stations Rehab

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $1,500

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3198

Construction of Fiber Communication Network on Freeways

Facility: Citywide

From:

To:

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $3,500

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3517

Maintenance of Stormwater management / Best Management Ponds

Facility: New York Ave. at South Dakota Ave. & Anacostia Freeway near mile marker 1

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $750

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2905

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 114

Page 118: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Normanstone/Fulton Street Culvert & LID

Facility: Normanstone Drive

From: Fulton STreet

To: 34th Street

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $2,200

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3299

Reconstruction of Kennedy Street NW from 16th St NW to Georgia Ave NW

Facility: Kennedy St NW

From: 16th NW

To: Georgia Ave

Complete In: 2017

Cost: $800

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3513

Resurfacing Streets and Freeways Citywide

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $85,150

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1149

Southwest Freeway Bridgeover South Capitol Street

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2017

Cost: $2,000

Agency Proj. ID: New

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3503

Streetlight Asset Mgmt & Streetlight Construction - Local

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $52,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2557

Streetlight Upgrade

Facility: Citywide

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $5,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3464

Systems Maintenance

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $0

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3268

Upgrade and Replacement of Overhead Freeway Signs

Facility: Citywide

From:

To:

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $4,700

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3519

OtherMaintenance Projects

Streetlight Asset Mgmt & Streetlight Construction - Federal

Facility:

From: Districtwide

To: Districtwide

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $60,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2589

System ExpansionTransit Projects

16th Street NW Transit Priority Implementation

Facility: 16th Street NW

From: H Street NW

To: Arkansas Avenue NW

Complete In: 2021

Cost: $15,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3522

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 115

Page 119: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

5303/5304 FTA Program

Facility: Citywide

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $2,870

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3230

DC Circulator New Buses for Replacement and Expansion

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $0

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3233

Farragut Station Pedestrian Tunnel

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $500

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1175

Union Station to Georgetown Streetcar Line

Facility:

From: H Street NE at 3rd St. NE

To: Wisconsin Avenue under Whitehurst Fwy

Complete In: 2026

Cost: $348,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3081

Operational ProgramTransit Projects

DC Circulator System Operations

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $0

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3234

School Transit Subsidy (District Wide)

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $0

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3236

Specialized Transportation Services for the Elderly & Persons with Disabilities

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $1,280

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1172

StudyFreight Projects

District Freight Plan

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $0

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3005

Virginia Avenue Tunnel Project

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $0

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3079

Operational ProgramFreight Projects

Diesel Idle Reduction Program

Facility: Citywide

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $1,200

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3465

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 116

Page 120: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Off-Hours Freight Delivery Pilot Project

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2017

Cost: $300

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3431

Planning and Systems Enhancement for Weight Stations

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $0

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3265

System MaintenanceSafety Projects

On-Call Subsurface Pavement Investigation,Engineering

Facility: Citywide

From:

To:

Complete In: 2017

Cost: $425

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3514

Suburban MarylandCharles County

System MaintenanceBridge Projects

Poplar Hill Road Bridge over Zekiah Swamp Run

Facility: Poplar Hill Road Bridge

From: Zekiah Swamp Run

To:

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $742

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3555

Frederick County

System ExpansionSecondary Projects

Christopher's Crossing

Facility: Christopher's Crossing

From: Shookstown Road

To: Rocky Springs Road

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $15,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3593

Christopher's Crossing

Facility: Christopher's Crossing

From: Walter Martz Road

To: Thomas Johnson Drive

Complete In: 2021

Cost: $6,310

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3594

Monocacy Blvd & Gashouse Pike - City of Frederick

Facility: Monocacy Blvd

From: Schifferstadt

To: Gas House Pike

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $15,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1181

System MaintenanceSecondary Projects

Various Roads - County Capital Improvement Program

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In:

Cost: $26,311

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2691

StudySecondary Projects

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 117

Page 121: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Shockley Drive/Spectrum Drive Connector

Facility: Shockley Drive/Spectrum Drive Connector

From: MD 85 Buckeystown Pike

To: Existing Spectrum Drive

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $15,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3038

System ExpansionBike/Ped Projects

Bikeways & Trails Program - County Capital Improvement Program

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2021

Cost: $2,512

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2692

System MaintenanceBridge Projects

Various Bridges - County Capital Improvement Program

Facility: Blacks Mill; Lewistown; Ball; Pete Wiles; Hessong Bridge; Reels Mill; Dixon Roads & Gas

From:

To:

Complete In: 2016

Cost: $10,718

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1180

MDOT/Maryland Transit Administration

System ExpansionEnhancement Projects

Camden New Stations

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $0

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3582

Penn New Stations

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $626,706

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3576

System MaintenanceMaintenance Projects

Camden Stations and Parking

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $199,260

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3581

Camden Train Storage and Maintenance Facilities

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $40,173

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3584

Penn Stations and Parking

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $930,417

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3575

Penn Train Storage and Maintenance Facilities

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $453,157

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3578

System ExpansionTransit Projects

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 118

Page 122: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Brunswick Line Extensions

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $0

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3592

Brunswick New Stations

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $0

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3588

Camden Line Extensions

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $0

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3586

Corridor Cities Transitway (CCT)

Facility:

From: Shady Grove

To: Metropolitan Grove

Complete In: 2021

Cost: $545,000

Agency Proj. ID: 1108

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1649

Penn Line Extensions

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $120,520

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3580

Purple Line

Facility: Purple Line

From: Bethesda

To: New Carrollton

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $2,410,000

Agency Proj. ID: 1042

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1133

Silver Spring Transit Center Phase II

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2015

Cost: $122,211

Agency Proj. ID: 254

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1563

US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Improvements Project

Facility: US 29 BRT

From: Burtonsville Park and Ride Lot

To: Silver Spring Transit Center

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $39,104

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3423

System MaintenanceTransit Projects

Brunswick Rail Infrastructure

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $228,185

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3589

Brunswick Rolling Stock

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $0

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3591

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 119

Page 123: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Brunswick Stations and Parking

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $348,706

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3587

Brunswick Train Storage and Maintenance Facilities

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $51,422

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3590

Camden Rail Infrastructure

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $297,284

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3583

Camden Rolling Stock

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $0

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3585

Large Urban Systems- Capital

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $98,195

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1267

MARC Locomotive Replacement

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $340,690

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3573

MARC Northeast Corridor Commission Contribution

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $172,204

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3570

MARC Railcar Fleet Replacement

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $469,904

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3574

MARC Rolling Stock Preservation

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $31,690

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3572

MARC System Preservation

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $172,123

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3571

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 120

Page 124: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Penn Rail Infrastructure

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $2,278,638

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3577

Penn Rolling Stock

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $0

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3579

Operational ProgramTransit Projects

Large Urban Operating

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $155,540

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3270

Ridesharing

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $24,500

Agency Proj. ID: 45

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1265

Rural Transit - Operating Assistance

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $38,472

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=867

Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities

Facility:

From:

To: Various

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $22,310

Agency Proj. ID: 0210

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3493

Small Urban Systems - Operating Assistance

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $242,256

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1540

OtherTransit Projects

Small Urban Systems - Capital

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $128,517

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1264

MDOT/Maryland Transportation Authority

System ExpansionPrimary Projects

Governor Harry W. Nice Bridge Improvement Project

Facility: US 301 Bridge over the Potomac River

From: US 301 Charles County, MD

To: US King George County, VA

Complete In: 2023

Cost: $768,600

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2617

MDOT/State Highway Administration

System ExpansionInterstate Projects

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 121

Page 125: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

I-270 at Watkins Mill Road Interchange

Facility: I 270

From: Watkins Mill Road

To:

Complete In: 2021

Cost: $120,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1188

I-270 Corridor

Facility: I 270

From: I 495

To: I 70 /US 40

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $3,428,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1186

I-270 Innovative Congestion Management

Facility: I 270 /I-270Y

From: I 70

To: I 495

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $113,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3564

I-70/US 40 at MD 144FA, Meadow Road, and Old National Pike Interchange

Facility: I 70 /US 40

From: MD 144FA /Meadow Road /Old National Pike

To:

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $33,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2250

I-70/US 40 Corridor

Facility: I 70

From: Mount Phillip Road

To: East of MD 144FA

Complete In: 2035

Cost: $143,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1187

I-95/I-495 at Greenbelt Metro Station Interchange

Facility: I 95 /I 495

From: Greenbelt Metro Station

To:

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $196,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1479

I-95/I-495 Corridor (North and West)

Facility: I 95 /I 495

From: Virginia State line/Potomac River (American Legion Bridge)

To: Baltimore Washington Parkway

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $2,011,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3281

I-95/I-495 Corridor (South and East)

Facility: I 95 /I 495

From: Baltimore Washington Parkway

To: Virginia State line/Potomac River (Woodrow Wilson Bridge)

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $2,161,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1182

Operational ProgramInterstate Projects

Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O) Corridors

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $350,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3637

System ExpansionPrimary Projects

MD 2/MD 4 Corridor (Calvert County)

Facility: MD 2 /MD 4

From: North of Stoakley Road /Hospital Drive

To: South of MD 765A

Complete In: 2040

Cost: $228,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1200

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 122

Page 126: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

MD 210 Corridor

Facility: MD 210

From: I 95 /I 495

To: MD 228

Complete In: 2040

Cost: $754,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1199

MD 3 Corridor

Facility: MD 3

From: I 595 /US 50 /US 301

To: I 97 /MD 32

Complete In: 2035

Cost: $1,797,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1195

MD 4 at Suitland Parkway Interchange

Facility: MD 4

From: Suitland Parkway

To:

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $131,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3446

MD 4 Corridor (Calvert County/Saint Mary's County)

Facility: MD 4

From: MD 2

To: MD 235

Complete In: 2031

Cost: $861,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2246

MD 4 Corridor (Prince George's County)

Facility: MD 4

From: I 95 /I 495

To: MD 223

Complete In: 2040

Cost: $533,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1194

MD 5 Corridor

Facility: MD 5

From: I 95 /I 495

To: US 301 (North Junction)

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $790,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1196

US 15 at Monocacy Boulevard Interchange

Facility: US 15

From: Monocacy Boulevard

To:

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $61,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=913

US 15 Corridor (North of Frederick City)

Facility: US 15

From: MD 26

To: North of Biggs Ford Road

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $213,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3567

US 15/US 40 Corridor (Frederick City)

Facility: US 15 /US 40

From: I 70

To: MD 26

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $207,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3566

US 29 Corridor

Facility: US 29

From: Sligo Creek Parkway

To: Howard County line/Patuxent River

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $646,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1197

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 123

Page 127: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

US 301 Corridor (Bowie)

Facility: US 301

From: I 595 /US 50

To: North of Mount Oak Road

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $449,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1619

US 301 Corridor (Waldorf)

Facility: US 301

From: MD 5 (north junction)

To: Smallwood Road

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $199,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2239

US 301 South Corridor Transportation Study

Facility: US 301

From: Virginia State line/Potomac River (Harry Nice Bridge)

To: I 595 /US 50

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $4,644,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1004

US 50 Corridor

Facility: US 50

From: District of Columbia line

To: I 95 /I 495

Complete In: 2035

Cost: $29,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3425

System ExpansionSecondary Projects

MD 117 Corridor

Facility: MD 117

From: I 270

To: West of Game Preserve Road

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $69,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1203

MD 124 Corridor

Facility: MD 124

From: Midcounty Highway

To: Warfield Road

Complete In: 2035

Cost: $129,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1206

MD 180/Ballenger Creek Pike Corridor

Facility: MD 180 /Ballenger Creek Pike

From: Greenfield Drive

To: Corporate Drive

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $170,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2261

MD 197 Corridor

Facility: MD 197

From: Kenhill Drive

To: MD 450

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $94,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2253

MD 202 Corridor

Facility: MD 202

From: Brightseat Road

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $24,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1190

MD 223 Corridor

Facility: MD 223

From: MD 4

To: Steed Road

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $120,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2248

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 124

Page 128: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

MD 28/MD 198 Corridor

Facility: MD 28 Norbeck Road /MD 198

From: MD 97

To: I 95

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $413,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1462

MD 450 Corridor

Facility: MD 450

From: Stonybrook Drive

To: MD 3

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $67,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1207

MD 85 Corridor

Facility: MD 85

From: English Muffin Way

To: North of Grove Road

Complete In: 2035

Cost: $220,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1210

MD 97 at Brookeville

Facility: MD 97

From: Gold Mine Road

To: North of Brookeville

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $52,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1213

MD 97 at MD 28 Interchange

Facility: MD 97

From: MD 28

To:

Complete In: 2035

Cost: $155,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1211

MD 97 at Randolph Road Interchange

Facility: MD 97

From: Randolph Road

To:

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $76,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1212

MD 97 Corridor

Facility: MD 97

From: MD 390

To: MD 192

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $52,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2618

Naval Support Activity Bethesda BRAC Improvements

Facility: Intersections near Naval Support Activity Bethesda

From:

To:

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $77,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2620

US 1 Corridor

Facility: US 1

From: College Avenue

To: I 95 /I 495

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $116,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1202

US 1/MD 201 Corridor

Facility: US 1

From: I 95 /I 495

To: North of Muirkirk Road

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $1,034,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1204

Operational ProgramTERMs Projects

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 125

Page 129: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Transportation Emissions Reduction Measures

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $108,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1221

System MaintenanceMaintenance Projects

System Preservation Projects

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $17,273,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1193

Montgomery County

System ExpansionSecondary Projects

Burtonsville Access Road

Facility: Burtonsville Access Road

From: MD 198

To: entrance to Burtonsville Shopping Center

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $6,900

Agency Proj. ID: 500500

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=995

Century Boulevard

Facility: Century Boulevard

From: Current terminus south of Oxbridge Tract

To: Intersection with future Dorsey Mill Road

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $15,837

Agency Proj. ID: 501115

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3045

Chapman Avenue Extended

Facility: Chapman Avenue Extended

From: Randolph Road

To: Old Georgetown Road

Complete In: 2016

Cost: $21,363

Agency Proj. ID: 500719

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=947

Clarksburg Transportation Connections

Facility: Clarksburg Transportation Connections

From: Snowden Farm Parkway / Little Seneca Parkway/ Brink Rd

To: Ridge Road/Frederick Road/MD 355

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $15,000

Agency Proj. ID: 501315

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3130

Dorsey Mill Road Bridge over I-270

Facility: I 270

From: Century Boulevard

To: Milestone Center Drive

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $9,100

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1577

Middlebrook Road Extended Widening

Facility: Middlebrook Road Ext.

From: MD 355

To: M Midcounty Highway

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $16,200

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1229

Montrose Parkway East

Facility: Montrose Parkway East

From: Easter limits of MD 355/ Montrose Interchange

To: MD Veirs Mill Road / Parklawn Drive

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $139,900

Agency Proj. ID: 500717

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1492

Platt Ridge Drive Extended

Facility: Platt Ridge Drive

From: terminus at Jones Bridge Road

To: Montrose Driveway

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $4,300

Agency Proj. ID: 501200

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2912

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 126

Page 130: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

System MaintenanceSecondary Projects

MD 355 at Randolph Road/Montrose Parkway (Montrose Parkway East)

Facility: Montrose Parkway

From: MD 355

To: MD 586

Complete In: 2024

Cost: $140,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1217

StudySecondary Projects

Goshen Road South

Facility: Goshen Road South

From: South of Girard Street

To: North of Warfield Road

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $128,630

Agency Proj. ID: 501107

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1226

Operational ProgramSecondary Projects

MidCounty Highway: MD 27 to MIddlebrook Road

Facility: Midcounty Highway Extended

From: MD 27 Ridge Road

To: Middlebrook Road

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $202,600

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1245

Snouffer School Road North

Facility: Snouffer School Road

From: MD 124 Centerway Road

To: Alliston Hollow Way

Complete In: 2016

Cost: $12,099

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1236

Snouffer School Road: Sweet Autumn Dr. to Centerway Road

Facility: Snouffer School Road: Sweet Autumn Drive to Centerway Rd

From: Sweet Autumn Drive

To: Centerway Road

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $23,710

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3141

System ExpansionBike/Ped Projects

Bethesda CBD Streetscape

Facility: Bethesda CBD Streetscape

From:

To: Bethesda CBD

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $8,214

Agency Proj. ID: 500102

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3043

Capital Crescent Trail

Facility: Capital Crescent Trail

From: Elm Street Park in Bethesda

To: Silver Spring

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $81,200

Agency Proj. ID: 501316

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3122

Falls Road East Side Hiker/Biker Path

Facility: Falls Road Bikeway - East Side

From: River Road

To: Dunster Road

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $22,340

Agency Proj. ID: 500905

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1586

Frederick Road Bike Path: Stringtown to Milestone Manor

Facility: Frederick Road (MD 355)

From: Stringtown Road

To: Milestone Manor Lane

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $7,193

Agency Proj. ID: 501118

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3102

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 127

Page 131: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

MacArthur Boulevard Bikeway Improvements

Facility: MacArthur Boulevard

From: Oberlin Avenue

To: DC Line

Complete In: 2027

Cost: $17,500

Agency Proj. ID: 500718

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2827

MD 355 Multimodal Crossing

Facility: MD 355 Medical Center Metrorail Station/NIH

From: MD 355 Medical Center Metrorail Station/NIH

To: Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (WRNMMC)

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $73,000

Agency Proj. ID: 501209

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2817

Metropolitan Branch Trail

Facility: Metropolitan Branch Trail

From: Existing trail end in Takoma Park

To: Silver Spring Transit Center

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $12,147

Agency Proj. ID: 501110

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3042

Needwood Road Bikepath

Facility: Needwood Road Bikepath

From: Deer Lake Road

To: MD Muncaster Mill Road

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $4,200

Agency Proj. ID: 501304

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3125

Seven Locks Bikeway & Safety Improvements

Facility: Seven Locks BIkeway & Safety Improvements

From: Montrose Road

To: Bradley Boulevard

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $27,000

Agency Proj. ID: 501303

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3126

System MaintenanceBike/Ped Projects

Sidewalk & Infrastructure Revitalization

Facility:

From:

To: Countywide

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $53,400

Agency Proj. ID: 508182

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3100

Operational ProgramBike/Ped Projects

Bikeway Program - Minor Projects

Facility: Bikeway Program - Minor Projects

From: countywide

To:

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $5,100

Agency Proj. ID: 507596

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1239

Sidewalk Program - Minor Projects

Facility: Sidewalk Program - Minor Projects

From: countywide

To:

Complete In:

Cost: $17,775

Agency Proj. ID: 506747

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1240

Transportation Improvements for Schools

Facility: Various

From:

To: Various

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $1,775

Agency Proj. ID: P509036

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3407

OtherBike/Ped Projects

Bicycle Pedestrian Priority Area Improvements

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $5,375

Agency Proj. ID: P501532

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3408

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 128

Page 132: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Flower Avenue Sidewalk

Facility: Flower Avenue

From: Piney Branch Road

To: Carroll Avenue

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $200

Agency Proj. ID: 501206

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3047

MD 355 Sidewalk (Hyattstown)

Facility: MD 355

From: Hyattstown Mill Road

To: Montgomery County / Frederick County Line

Complete In: 2017

Cost: $2,180

Agency Proj. ID: 501104

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3041

Pedestrian Safety Program

Facility: Pedestrian Safety Program

From:

To: Countywide

Complete In:

Cost: $16,312

Agency Proj. ID: 500333

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1444

System MaintenanceBridge Projects

Beach Drive Bridge M-PK-24001

Facility: Beach Drive Bridge

From: Over Silver Creek

To:

Complete In:

Cost: $2,000

Agency Proj. ID: 509132

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2994

Bridge Renovation

Facility: County-wide

From: County-wide

To: County-wide

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $19,000

Agency Proj. ID: 509753

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3097

Brink Road Bridge M-0064001

Facility: Brink Road Bridge

From: Over Great Seneca Creek

To: Over Great Seneca Creek

Complete In: 2014

Cost: $1,500

Agency Proj. ID: 509132

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2995

Dennis Avenue Bridge Replacement M-0194

Facility: Dennis Avenue Bridge

From: Tributary to Sligo Creek

To:

Complete In: 2024

Cost: $5,610

Agency Proj. ID: 501701

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3569

Elmhirst Parkway Bridge M-PK-13001

Facility: Elmhirst Parkway Bridge

From:

To: Over tributary to Rock Creek

Complete In: 2015

Cost: $1,965

Agency Proj. ID: 509132

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2997

Garrett Park Road Bridge M-PK-04001

Facility: Garrett Park Road Bridge M-PK-04001

From:

To: Over Rock Creek

Complete In:

Cost: $2,000

Agency Proj. ID: 509132

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2998

Gold Mine Road Bridge M-0096001

Facility: Gold Mine Road Bridge M-0096001

From:

To: Over Hawlings River

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $4,433

Agency Proj. ID: 509132

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2999

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 129

Page 133: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Lyttonsville Bridge

Facility: Bridge over Georgetown Branch / Interim Capital Crescent Trail

From:

To:

Complete In: 2017

Cost: $2,500

Agency Proj. ID: P501421

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3406

Park Valley Road Bridge M-PK-03001

Facility:

From:

To: Over Sligo Creek

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $3,950

Agency Proj. ID: 509132

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3000

Piney Meetinghouse Road Bridge M-0021001

Facility: Piney Meetinghouse Road Bridge M-0021001

From:

To: Over Watts Branch

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $4,025

Agency Proj. ID: 509132

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3001

Valley Road Bridge M-0111001

Facility: Valley Road Bridge M-0111001

From:

To: Over Booze Creek

Complete In: 2017

Cost: $3,375

Agency Proj. ID: 509132

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3002

System ExpansionEnhancement Projects

Silver Spring Green Trail

Facility: Silver Spring Green Trail

From: Silver Spring Metro Station

To: Sligo Creek Hiker-Biker Trail

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $2,000

Agency Proj. ID: 509975

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1242

System MaintenanceITS Projects

Traffic Signal System Modernization

Facility: Traffic Signal System Modernization

From:

To:

Complete In: 2016

Cost: $35,897

Agency Proj. ID: 500704

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1620

Operational ProgramITS Projects

Advanced Transportation Management System

Facility: Advanced Transportation Management System

From: Countywide

To: Countywide

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $60,700

Agency Proj. ID: 509399

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1237

System ExpansionOther Projects

East Gude Drive Roadway Improvements

Facility: East Gude Drive Roadway Improvements

From: Crabbs Branch Way

To: Southlawn Drive

Complete In: 2021

Cost: $6,027

Agency Proj. ID: 501309

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3128

White Flint District East - Transportation

Facility:

From:

To: White Flint East

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $29,400

Agency Proj. ID: 501204

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3049

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 130

Page 134: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

White Flint District West: Transportation & Workaround

Facility:

From:

To: White Flint

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $71,100

Agency Proj. ID: 501116

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3050

StudyOther Projects

White Flint Traffic Analysis and Mitigation

Facility: White Flint Sector Plan Area & Surrounding Area

From:

To: White Flint Sector Plan Area & Surrounding Area

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $1,949

Agency Proj. ID: 501202

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3051

Operational ProgramOther Projects

Traffic Signals

Facility: Countywide

From:

To: Countywide

Complete In:

Cost: $35,106

Agency Proj. ID: 507154

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3143

OtherOther Projects

Colesville Depot

Facility:

From:

To: Cape May Road

Complete In: 2017

Cost: $10,414

Agency Proj. ID: 500709

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3098

Intersection & Spot Improvements

Facility: Intersection and Spot Improvements

From:

To: Countywide

Complete In:

Cost: $8,904

Agency Proj. ID: 507017

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3105

Neighborhood Traffic Calming

Facility: Residential neighborhoods County-wide

From:

To: Residential Neighborhoods County-wide

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $2,631

Agency Proj. ID: 509523

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3106

Seminary Road Intersection Improvement

Facility: Seminary Road Intersection Improvement

From: Brookeville Road/Seminary Place Intersection

To: LInden Lane/Second Avenue Intersection

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $7,300

Agency Proj. ID: 501307

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3129

Streetlight Enhancements - CBD /Town Center

Facility: Streetlight Enhancements - CBD / Town Center

From:

To: CBDs and Town Centers

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $4,400

Agency Proj. ID: 500512

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3107

System MaintenanceMaintenance Projects

Bridge Preservation Program

Facility: County-wide

From:

To: County-wide

Complete In:

Cost: $8,779

Agency Proj. ID: 500313

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3096

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 131

Page 135: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Resurfacing: Primary/Arterial

Facility: County-wide

From:

To: County-wide

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $50,800

Agency Proj. ID: 508527

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3099

Transit Park and Ride Lot Renovations

Facility:

From:

To: Transit Park and Ride Lot Renovations

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $3,000

Agency Proj. ID: 500534

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3101

System ExpansionTransit Projects

MD 650 New Hampshire Avenue BRT

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $285,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3672

North Bethesda Transitway Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project

Facility: Rock Spring Drive/Old Georgetown Road

From: Montgomery Mall Transit Center

To: White Flint Metrorail Station or Grosvenor Metrorail Station

Complete In: 2035

Cost: $115,150

Agency Proj. ID: CIP 501318

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3663

Olney Transit Center

Facility:

From: MD 108 adjacent to or north of MD 108

To:

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $1,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1249

Randolph Road Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project

Facility: Randolph Road BRT

From: US 29

To: MD 355

Complete In: 2040

Cost: $102,000

Agency Proj. ID: CIP 501318

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3662

Veirs Mill Bus Rapid Transit

Facility: Veirs Mill Road

From: Wheaton Metrorail Station

To: Rockville Metrorail Station

Complete In: 2017

Cost: $6,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3103

System MaintenanceTransit Projects

ADA Compliance Transportation Access

Facility: ADA Compliance Transportation Access

From: Countywide

To:

Complete In:

Cost: $9,150

Agency Proj. ID: 509325

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1252

Bus Stop Improvement Program

Facility: Bus Stop Improvement Program

From: countywide

To:

Complete In: 2023

Cost: $5,100

Agency Proj. ID: 507658

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1255

Low or No Emissions FTA Electric Bus grant

Facility: Silver Spring Depot Charging Stations

From:

To:

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $4,395

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3595

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 132

Page 136: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

RideOn Bus Fleet

Facility:

From: Countywide

To: County-wide

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $149,500

Agency Proj. ID: 500821

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1257

StudyTransit Projects

Countywide BRT Study

Facility:

From:

To: Countywide

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $1,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3053

MD 355 Bus Rapid Transit Study

Facility: MD 355

From: MD 410

To: Redgrave Place

Complete In: 2040

Cost: $1,080,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3424

Operational ProgramTransit Projects

Bethesda Bikeway and Pedestrian Facilities

Facility: Bethesda Bikeway and Pedestrian Facilities

From: Bethesda CBD

To:

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $5,200

Agency Proj. ID: 500119

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1553

Veirs Mill Road Bus Enhancement

Facility: Veirs Mill Road

From: Rockville

To: Wheaton

Complete In: 2015

Cost: $15,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1253

OtherTransit Projects

Bethesda Metro South Entrance

Facility: Bethesda Metro

From:

To: Bethesda Metro

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $110,200

Agency Proj. ID: 500929

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2726

Montgomery Mall Transit Center

Facility: Montgomery Mall Transit Center

From: Montgomery Mall

To:

Complete In: 2016

Cost: $1,342

Agency Proj. ID: 500714

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1529

Prince George's County

System ExpansionPrimary Projects

Contee Road Reconstruction

Facility: Contee Road

From: US 1

To: Old Gunpowder Road

Complete In:

Cost: $18,835

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2619

System ExpansionSecondary Projects

Addison Road

Facility: Addison Road

From: MD 214

To: Walker Mill Road

Complete In: 2024

Cost: $20,981

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1268

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 133

Page 137: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Brandywine Road

Facility: Brandywine Road

From: MD 223 Piscataway Road north of

To: Thrift Road

Complete In: 2015

Cost: $960

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1273

Brinkley Road

Facility: Brinkley Road

From: MD 414 St. Barnabas Road

To: MD Allentown Road

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $14,200

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1274

Brooks Drive

Facility: Brooks Drive Extended

From: Marlboro Pike

To: Rollins Avenue

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $3,140

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1275

Campus Way North

Facility: Campus Way North

From: Lake Arbor Way

To: Evarts Drive

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $3,780

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1277

Cherry Hill Road

Facility: Cherry Hill Road

From: Montgomery County line

To: US 1 Baltimore Avenue

Complete In: 2024

Cost: $13,322

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1278

Church Road

Facility: Church Road

From: Woodmore Road

To: MD 214 Central Avenue

Complete In: 2024

Cost: $9,448

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1279

Columbia Park Road

Facility: Columbia Park Road

From: US 50

To: Columbia Terrace

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $1,370

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1280

Columbia Park Road

Facility: US 50 Columbia Park Road Ramps

From: WB ramp to Columbia Park Rd

To:

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $64,200

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1313

Contee Road

Facility: Contee Road

From: US 1 Baltimore Avenue

To: Old Gunpowder Road

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $24,512

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1281

Dangerfield Road

Facility: Dangerfield Road

From: Cheltenham Avenue

To: MD Woodyard Road

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $3,700

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1282

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 134

Page 138: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Dower House Road

Facility: Dower House Road

From: MD 223 Woodyard Road

To: MD Pennsylvania Avenue

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $40,900

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1283

Fisher road

Facility: Fisher road

From: Brinkley Road

To: Holton Lane

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $2,300

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1284

Forbes Boulevard

Facility: Forbes Boulevard Extended

From: south of Amtrak

To: MD Greenbelt Road

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $2,770

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1285

Forestville Road

Facility: Forestville Road

From: Rena Road

To: I Ramps @ Forestville Road

Complete In: 2014

Cost: $2,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1286

Fort Washington Road

Facility: Fort Washington Road

From: Riverview road

To: MD Indian Head Highway

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $3,500

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1287

Good Luck Road

Facility: Good Luck Road

From: MD 201 Kenliworth Avenue east of

To: MD Greenbelt Road

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $9,760

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1288

Hill Road

Facility: Hill Road

From: MD 214 Central Avenue

To: Sheriff Road

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $7,134

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1290

Iverson St.

Facility: Iverson St. Extended

From: Wheeler Road

To: 19th Avenue

Complete In: 2018

Cost:

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1015

Livingston Road and Bridge

Facility: Livingston Road

From: MD 210 Indian Head Highway at Eastover

To: MD Indian Head Highway at Kerby Hill Road

Complete In: 2024

Cost: $3,350

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1291

Lottsford Vista Road

Facility: Lottsford Vista Road

From: MD 704 ML King Jr Highway

To: Lottsford Road

Complete In: 2015

Cost: $10,150

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1292

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 135

Page 139: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Metzerott Road

Facility: Metzerott Road

From: MD 650 New Hampshire Avenue

To: MD University Boulevard

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $8,520

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1295

Murkirk Road

Facility: Muirkirk Road

From: US 1 Baltimore Avenue west of

To: Odell Road

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $6,440

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1296

Oak Grove and Leeland Roads

Facility: Oak Grove and Leeland Roads

From: MD 193 Watkins Park Road

To: US Robert Crain Highway

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $6,450

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1297

Old Alexandria Ferry Road

Facility: Old Alexandria Ferry Road

From: MD 223 Woodyard Road

To: MD Branch Avenue

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $3,080

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1298

Old Branch Avenue

Facility: Old Branch Avenue

From: MD 223 Piscataway Road north of

To: Allentown Road

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $5,240

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1299

Old Fort Road

Facility: Old Fort Road Extended

From: MD 223 Piscataway Road

To: Old Fort Road

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $6,500

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1533

Old Gunpowder Road

Facility: Old Gunpowder Road

From: Powder Mill Road

To: MD Sandy Springs Road

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $17,764

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1300

Presidential Parkway

Facility: Presidential Parkway

From: Suitland Parkway

To: Melwood Road

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $12,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1324

Ritchie Road/Forestville Road

Facility: Ritchie Road/Forestville Road

From: Ritchie Marlboro Rd

To: MD Pennsylvania Avenue

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $22,500

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1302

Ritchie-Marlboro Road

Facility: Ritchie Marlboro Road

From: White House Road

To: Old Marlboro Pike

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $28,974

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2623

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 136

Page 140: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Rollins Avenue

Facility: Rollins Avenue

From: MD 214 Central Avenue

To: Walker Mill Road

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $7,380

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1303

Rosaryville Road

Facility: Rosaryville Road

From: US 301 Robert Crain Highway

To: MD Woodyard Road

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $5,090

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1304

Spine Road

Facility: Spine Road

From: MD/US Branch Avenue

To: MD Brandywine Road

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $11,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1305

Springfield Road

Facility: Springfield Road

From: MD 546 Lanham-Severn Road

To: Good Luck Road

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $1,460

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1306

Suitland Parkway

Facility: Suitland Parkway

From: interchange at Rena/Forestville Roads

To:

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $2,830

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1307

Suitland Road

Facility: Suitland Road

From: MD 337 Allentown Road

To: MD Silver Hill Road

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $13,587

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1308

Sunnyside Avenue

Facility: Sunnyside Avenue

From: US 1 Baltimore Avenue

To: MD Kenliworth Avenue

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $2,500

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1309

Surratts Road

Facility: Surratts Road

From: Beverly Avenue

To: Brandywine Road

Complete In: 2012

Cost: $15,470

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1310

Temple Hill Road

Facility: Temple Hill Road

From: MD 223 Piscataway Road

To: MD St. Barnabas Road

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $10,310

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1311

Van Dusen Road

Facility: Van Dusen Road

From: Contee Road

To: MD Sandy Springs Road

Complete In: 2015

Cost: $21,200

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1314

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 137

Page 141: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Walker Mill Road

Facility: Walker Mill Road Extended

From: Silver Hill Road Extended

To: I

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $20,100

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1316

Wheeler Road

Facility: Wheeler Road

From: MD 414 St. Barnabas Road

To: District of Columbia limits

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $3,460

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1317

White House Road

Facility: White House Road

From: Ritchie-Marlboro Road

To: MD Largo-Landover Road

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $14,200

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1318

Whitfield Chapel Road

Facility: Whitfield Chapel Road

From: MD 450 Annapolis Road

To: Ardwick-Ardmore Road

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $3,334

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1319

Widen Karen Boulevard from Walker Mill Road to Central Avenue (MD 214)

Facility: Karen Boulevard

From: Walker Mill Road

To: MD 214 Central Avenue

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $0

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3438

Widen Westphalia Road

Facility: Westphalia Road

From: MD 4 Pennsylvania Avenue

To: Ritchie Malboro Road

Complete In:

Cost: $16,607

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2624

Woodyard Road

Facility: MD 223 Woodyard Road

From: Rosaryville Road

To: Dower House Road

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $2,800

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1294

System MaintenanceSecondary Projects

Auth Road

Facility: Auth Road

From: Henderson Way

To: MD Allentown Road

Complete In: 2024

Cost: $16,950

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2736

Montgomery Road Improvments

Facility: Montgomery Road

From: Powder Mill Road

To: US 1

Complete In:

Cost:

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2734

Oxon Hill Road

Facility: Oxon Hill Road

From: National Harbor Ent.

To: MD At the Livingston Sq.Shopping Center

Complete In: 2014

Cost: $20,944

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2257

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 138

Page 142: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Rhode Island Avenue

Facility: Rhode Island Avenue

From: MD 193 University Boulevard

To: US 1 Baltimore Avenue

Complete In: 2024

Cost: $11,327

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1301

Traffic Congestion Improvemets

Facility:

From:

To: various locations

Complete In:

Cost: $19,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2745

Operational ProgramSecondary Projects

Allentown Road Relocated

Facility: Allentown Road Relocated

From: MD 210 Indian Head Highway

To: Brinkley Road

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $9,090

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1270

Ardwick-Ardmore Road

Facility: Ardwick-Ardmore Road

From: MD 704

To: St. Josephs Drive

Complete In: 2015

Cost: $10,400

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1320

Bowie Race Track Road

Facility: Bowie Race Track Road

From: MD 450 Annapolis Road

To: Old Chapel Road

Complete In: 2015

Cost: $5,670

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1272

System MaintenanceUrban Projects

NEw Carrollton Transit Oriented Development Infrastrucure

Facility: Various locations County-wide

From:

To: various locations

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $36,700

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3415

System MaintenanceBike/Ped Projects

School access project

Facility:

From:

To: various locations

Complete In:

Cost: $6,184

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3058

Operational ProgramBike/Ped Projects

Pedestrian Safety Improvements

Facility: Various locations County-wide

From:

To: various locations

Complete In:

Cost: $43,609

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3410

System ExpansionBridge Projects

Governor Bridge Road

Facility: Governor Bridge Road

From: US 301

To: Anne Arundel County

Complete In: 2021

Cost: $5,890

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1425

System MaintenanceBridge Projects

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 139

Page 143: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Brandywine Road Bridge Replacement

Facility: Brandywine Road Bridge

From: North side of Piscataway Creek

To: South side of Piscataway Creek

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $5,907

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2605

Bridge Rehabilitation, Federal Aid

Facility:

From:

To: various locations

Complete In: 2023

Cost: $10,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2600

Bridge Replacement - Governor Bridge Road

Facility: Over Patuxant River

From: East bank of river

To: West bank of river

Complete In:

Cost: $5,890

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3638

Bridge Replacement - Oxon Hill Road

Facility:

From:

To: Over Henson Creek

Complete In: 2021

Cost: $5,524

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2866

Bridge Replacement - Temple Hill Road

Facility:

From:

To: Over Pea HIll Branch

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $6,280

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3116

Bridge Replacement -Cherry Hill Road

Facility: Over Paint Branch

From:

To: Over Paint Branch

Complete In: 2021

Cost: $9,550

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3639

Commo Road Bridge Replacement

Facility:

From:

To: Over Piscataway Creek

Complete In:

Cost: $2,693

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3056

Sunnyside Avenue Bridge Replacement

Facility: Sunnyside Avenue Bridge

From: west side of Indian Creek

To: east side of Indian Creek

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $12,382

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2608

System MaintenanceEnhancement Projects

County Revitalization & Restoration 2

Facility: Various locations County-wide

From:

To: various locations county-wide

Complete In: 2021

Cost: $9,470

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3133

Operational ProgramEnhancement Projects

Green Street Improvements

Facility:

From:

To: various locations

Complete In:

Cost: $11,810

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3057

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 140

Page 144: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Planning and site Acquisition 2

Facility: various locations

From:

To: various locations

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $2,800

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3411

Transportation Enhancements 2

Facility: Various locations County-wide

From:

To: various locations

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $13,176

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3414

StudyOther Projects

Standard Details/Drawings for Low-Cost Bridge/Culvert Structures

Facility:

From:

To: Prince George's County

Complete In:

Cost: $100

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3495

OtherOther Projects

Developer Contribution Projects

Facility:

From:

To: various locations

Complete In: 2024

Cost: $23,144

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2738

System MaintenanceMaintenance Projects

Curb and Road Rehabilitation I & II

Facility:

From:

To: varoius locations

Complete In:

Cost: $115,761

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2737

Operational ProgramMaintenance Projects

ADA Right of Way Modifications

Facility:

From:

To: various locations

Complete In: 2024

Cost: $5,325

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3115

Operational ProgramTransit Projects

Bus Mass Transit/Metro Access 2

Facility:

From:

To: County wide

Complete In:

Cost: $8,247

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2891

System MaintenanceSafety Projects

Street Lights and Traffic Signals 2

Facility: Various locations County-wide

From:

To: various locations

Complete In:

Cost: $29,295

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3413

Northern VirginiaVDOT

System ExpansionInterstate Projects

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 141

Page 145: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

395 Express Lanes Project in Northern Virginia

Facility: I 395 HOV Lanes

From: Turkeycock Run near Duke Street

To: vicinity of Eads Street, Arlington County

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $220,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3525

Boundary Chanel Drive Modifications

Facility: Boundary Channel Drive

From: I 395 Shirley Highway

To: Old Jefferson Davis Hwy & N. Jefferson Davis

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $8,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3093

DAAH/I-495 Interchange Flyover Ramp Relocation (Phase IV DAAH)

Facility: I 495

From: EB Dulles Airport Access Highway (DAAH) - Inner Lanes

To: I NB GP Lanes

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $28,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3186

Dulles Airport Access Road

Facility:

From: Dulles Airport

To: VA

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $40,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1965

Dulles Greenway EB Transition

Facility: 267 Dulles Toll Road

From: Dulles Greenway/Dulles Toll Road Merge

To: Centreville Road

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $25,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3671

Dulles Toll Road Ramp to Greensboro Drive Extension

Facility:

From: VA 267 Dulles Toll Road

To: Greensboro Drive to Tyco Road

Complete In: 2036

Cost: $28,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3153

EPG Access to I-95

Facility: I 95 I-95 Reversible Ramp

From: EPG Southern Loop Road

To: I HOV/BUS/HOT Lanes

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $57,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2668

I-395 Construct 4th Southbound Lane

Facility: I 395 Henry G. Shirley Memorial Highway

From: VA 236 North of Duke Street

To: South of Edsall Road

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $58,500

Agency Proj. ID: 103316

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3179

I-495 Capital Beltway Auxiliary Lanes

Facility: I 495 Capital Beltway NB and SB

From: Hemming Avenue Underpass

To: VA Georgetown Pike

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $3,235

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3272

I-495 HOT/HOV Lanes

Facility: I 495 Capital Beltway HOT Lanes

From: I 95/ 395/495 - Springfield Interchange

To: American Legion Bridge

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $500,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2069

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 142

Page 146: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

I-495 Interchange Ramp Phase II, Ramp 3 DAAH

Facility: I 495

From: SB I-495

To: WB Dulles Airport Access Highway (DAAH)

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $42,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3208

I-66 @ Route 28 Interchange Improvements

Facility: I 66 I-66 @Rte 28

From: 1.0mi west of Rte 28

To: 1.0 mi east of Rte 28

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $50,000

Agency Proj. ID: 103317

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3264

I-66 Corridor Improvements Project

Facility: I 66 Outrside of the Beltway

From: I 495 Fairfax

To: US 15 PWC

Complete In: 2040

Cost: $4,400,000

Agency Proj. ID: 0066-96A-4

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3448

I-66 Spot Improvements Inside the Beltway

Facility: I 66

From: Fairfax Dr to Sycamore St; Washington Blvd to Dulles Airport Access Road; & Lee Hwy/S

To:

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $59,000

Agency Proj. ID: 78826

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2096

I-95 Auxiliary Lane, between Route 123, Exit 160 and Route 294, Exit 158

Facility: I 95

From: Rt 123

To: Rt 294

Complete In: 2028

Cost: $27,500

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3667

I-95 Express Lane Extension to Fredericksburg

Facility: I 95

From: Russell Road (exit 148)

To: 0.25 miles south of Exit 148

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $16,500

Agency Proj. ID: 110527

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3556

I-95 NB DIRECTIONAL OFF RAMP TO NB FAIRFAX COUNTY PARKWAY

Facility: I 95

From: VA 7100 Fairfax County Parkway Exit 166

To: 0.6 mi west of Exit 166

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $3,000

Agency Proj. ID: 93033

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2854

I-95 Reconstruct Interchange

Facility: I 95 Capital Beltway Interchange

From: VA 613

To:

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $40,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2147

SB I-95 Ramp

Facility: I 95 I-95 Ramp

From: I 95 SB I-95

To: NB Fairfax County Parkway/EPG Southern Loop Road

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $5,581

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2667

Transit Service Improvements

Facility: I 66

From: Fauquier County Line

To: Rosslyn

Complete In: 2021

Cost: $3,205

Agency Proj. ID: 81009

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1759

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 143

Page 147: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Widen Dulles Greenway - Eastbound Only

Facility: Dulles Greenway - eastbound only

From: Toll Plaza

To: Dulles Toll Road

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $0

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3680

System MaintenanceInterstate Projects

Construct noise barrier to fulfill environmental commitments from the I395 Auxiliary Lane project. N

Facility: I 395

From: 0.280 mi. north of Duke Street

To: 0.048 mi. south of Sanger Avenue

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $7,000

Agency Proj. ID: 110729

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3562

I-395 NORTHERN EXTENSION MULTI-MODAL ACCESS TO PENTAGON (2B)

Facility: I 395

From: Edsall Road

To: Washington D.C.

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $10,000

Agency Proj. ID: 110728

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3561

StudyInterstate Projects

I-66 Study / Access Improvements(Outside the Beltway)

Facility: I 66

From: US 15 @ Haymarket

To: I- Capital Beltway

Complete In: 2021

Cost: $73,823

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1853

Operational ProgramInterstate Projects

Congestion Management Plan - GEC Mega Proj. Admin.

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $15,000

Agency Proj. ID: 86527

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2270

I-66 Multimodal Improvement Project, inside the Beltway

Facility: I 66 Inside the Beltway

From: I 495 Fairfax County

To: RT 29 Near Roslyn, Arlington County

Complete In: 2040

Cost: $375,000

Agency Proj. ID: 107371

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3484

Interstate 395 - Study for Safety & Traffic on NB Lanes - PE Only

Facility: I 395

From: Boundary Drive

To: Washington D.C. Line

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $19,173

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2291

OtherInterstate Projects

I-395 NORTHERN EXTENSION PROJECT OWNER COSTS (2A)

Facility: I 395

From: Edsall Road

To: Washington D.C. Line

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $34,000

Agency Proj. ID: 108361

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3560

System ExpansionPrimary Projects

Boundary Channel Drive Interchange

Facility: Boundary Channel Drive

From: I-395

To:

Complete In: 2021

Cost: $19,300

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3658

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 144

Page 148: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Construct Interchange at Prince William Pkwy and Clover Hill Road

Facility: VA 234 Prince William Parkway

From: Clover Hill Road

To:

Complete In: 2026

Cost: $14,500

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3665

Construct Interchange at Rte. 7 and Rte 659 - Belmont Ridge Road

Facility: VA 7

From: 1.0 mi. west of Rte 659

To: 0.5 east of Rte 659

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $72,000

Agency Proj. ID: 99481

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3010

Construct VA 234 Bypass Interchange @ Balls Ford Road

Facility: VA 234 Bypass

From: Va Balls Ford Road Relocated

To:

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $145,000

Agency Proj. ID: 105420 , T

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3177

Dulles Toll Road Eastbound Collector/Distributor/Additional Lane

Facility: VA 267 Dulles Toll Road

From: VA 684 Spring Hill Road

To: VA Wiehle Ave.

Complete In: 2036

Cost: $62,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3151

Dulles Toll Road Ramp to Boone Blvd Extension

Facility:

From: VA 267 Dulles Toll Road

To: Boone Boulevard @ Ashgrove Lane

Complete In: 2037

Cost: $79,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3152

Dulles Toll Road Westbound Collector/Distributor/Additional Lane

Facility: VA 267 Dulles Toll Road

From: VA 684 Spring Hill Road

To: VA Wiehle Ave.

Complete In: 2037

Cost: $124,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3154

I-495 Overpass at Tysons Corner Center

Facility: New Bridge/Road

From: Tysons Corner Center RIng Road

To: Old Meadow Road

Complete In: 2035

Cost: $18,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3157

Lee Highway Widening

Facility: US 29 Lee Highway

From: VA 659 Union Mill Road

To: Buckleys Gate Drive

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $32,700

Agency Proj. ID: 110329

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3474

Manassas National Battlefield Park Bypass

Facility: Manassas National Battlefield Park Bypass

From: US 29 Intersection with Rte. 705 (Pageland Lane) & Rt 29

To: US West of intersection of Bull Run Post Office Rd & Rt 29

Complete In: 2035

Cost: $28,509

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3061

Nokesville Road Widening

Facility: VA 28 Nokesville Road

From: VA 619 Linton Hall Road

To: City of Manassas SW Corporate limit

Complete In: 2021

Cost: $34,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3163

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 145

Page 149: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Prince William Parkway / University Boulevard Interchange

Facility: VA 294 Prince William Parkway

From: VA 840 University Boulevard

To:

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $70,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3471

Route 1 Improvements

Facility: US 1 Jefferson Davis Highway

From: Mary's Way

To: VA Featherstone Drive

Complete In: 2021

Cost: $107,000

Agency Proj. ID: 104303

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3173

Route 1 Widening

Facility: US 1 Jefferson Davis Highway

From: Fuller Road

To: Stafford County Line

Complete In: 2040

Cost: $58,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3291

Route 123 (Chain Bridge Road) Widening (Old Courthouse Road to Rt 7)

Facility: VA 123 Chain Bridge Road

From: VA 677 Old Courthouse Road

To: VA Leesburg Pike

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $8,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3159

Route 15 Widening

Facility: US 15 James Madison Highway

From: Battlefield Parkway

To: VA 661 Montresor Road

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $33,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3608

Route 7 (Leesburg Pike) Widening (I-495-I-66)

Facility: VA 7 Leesburg Pike

From: I 495 Capital Beltway

To: US Curtis Memorial Parkway

Complete In: 2021

Cost: $71,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3161

Route 7 (Leesburg Pike) Widening (VA 267 to Reston Ave.)

Facility: VA 7 Leesburg Pike

From: VA 267 Dulles TollRoad

To: VA Reston Avenue

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $300,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3160

Rt 1 Widen to 6 lanes (Phase I of Rt 1/123 Interchange (CN Only)

Facility:

From: .50 miles south of existing Rte 123

To: .40 miles North of existing Rte 123

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $35,015

Agency Proj. ID: 94102

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2959

Rte 123 Widen Roadway to 4 Lanes

Facility: VA 123 Ox Road

From: Southward from Burke Center Parkway

To: Prince William County Line

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $59,412

Agency Proj. ID: 16622

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1784

Rte. 28 Widening

Facility: VA 28

From: Godwin Drive

To: South CIty Limits

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $13,700

Agency Proj. ID: 96721

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2956

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 146

Page 150: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Shirley Gate Road Extension & Intyerchange with Fairfax County Parkway with NO connections withPopes

Facility: VA 286 Fairfax County Parkway

From: US 29 Lee Highway

To: Rolling Road

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $269,300

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3472

Shirley Gate Road Extension & Intyerchange with Fairfax County Parkway with NO connections withPopes

Facility: VA 286 Fairfax County Parkway

From: VA 267 Dulles Toll Road

To: Rugby Road

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $126,800

Agency Proj. ID: #52 - #53

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3473

Sudley Manor Drive/Prince William Parkway Interchange

Facility: VA 234 Prince William Parkway

From: VA 1566 Sudley Manor Drive

To:

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $80,600

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3467

Sudley Road Third Lane

Facility: VA 234 Suddley Road

From: Grant Avenue

To: Godwin Drive

Complete In: 2021

Cost: $7,400

Agency Proj. ID: 109293

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3641

US 1 Construct 6-Lane divided roadway

Facility: US 1

From: VA 638 Neabsco Mills Road

To: VA Featherstone Road

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $22,982

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2685

US 1 Construct 6-Lane Divided Roadway

Facility: US 1

From: VA 1109 Brady's Hill Road

To: VA Neabsco Mills

Complete In: 2024

Cost: $127,000

Agency Proj. ID: 90339

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2594

US 1, Widen, Reconstruct Interchange, Study

Facility: US 1

From: Stafford County Line

To: I Capital Beltway SCL Alexandria

Complete In: 2035

Cost: $37,481

Agency Proj. ID: 107187

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1942

US 1/ VA 123 Interchange, Widen

Facility: US 1 Interchange

From: VA 123

To:

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $110,100

Agency Proj. ID: 100938, 14

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2161

US 15 South King Street Widening

Facility: US 15 South King Street

From: Evergreen Mill Road

To: SCL of Leesburg

Complete In: 2013

Cost: $9,365

Agency Proj. ID: 17687

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2102

US 15, Widen

Facility: US 15 James Madison Highway

From: US 29 Lee Highway

To: VA 55

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $54,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1803

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 147

Page 151: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

US 29, Construct, Widen

Facility: US 29

From: ECL City of Fairfax (vic. Nutley St.)

To: I Capital Beltway

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $130,453

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1933

US 50 Improvements, Fairfax

Facility: US 50

From: ECL City of Fairfax

To: Arlington County Line

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $249,287

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2182

US 50 Interchange at Loudoun County Parkway

Facility: US 50 Lee Jackson Memorial Highway

From: VA 606 Loudoun County Parkway

To:

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $60,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2875

US 50 Interchanges (3 locations)

Facility: US 50 US 50

From: West Spine (Gum Srprings Rd);South Riding Blvd.;Tall Cedars Pkwy

To:

Complete In: 2040

Cost: $150,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3354

VA 123 Widen

Facility: VA 123 Chain Bridge Road

From: VA 639 Horner

To: Devil's Reach Road

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $2,950

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1723

VA 123, Widen

Facility: VA 123 Chain Bridge Road

From: Burke Center Parkway

To: Braddock Road

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $10,962

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1856

VA 234 Bypass Interchange @ Dumfries Road/Brentsville

Facility: VA 234 Bypass

From:

To:

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $74,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3178

VA 234 Dumfries Road Widening

Facility: VA 234 Dumfries Road

From: South Corporate Limits

To: Hastings Drive

Complete In: 2040

Cost: $4,353

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2020

VA 234, Widen/Construct with Interchange at US 1

Facility: VA 234 Dumfries Road

From: US 1

To: VA Bypass at Limstrong, VA 649

Complete In: 2040

Cost: $96,380

Agency Proj. ID: 205

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2114

VA 236, Reconstruct, Widen

Facility: VA 236

From: Pickett Road

To: I

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $58,206

Agency Proj. ID: 108685

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1760

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 148

Page 152: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

VA 27, Reconstruct Interchange at VA 244

Facility: VA 27

From: VA 244 Columbia Pike

To:

Complete In: 2013

Cost: $51,516

Agency Proj. ID: 13528

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2117

VA 28 PPTA, Upgrade, Construct

Facility: VA 28

From: I 66

To: Loudoun County Line

Complete In: 2040

Cost: $100,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1734

VA 28 widen

Facility: VA 28 Nokesville Road

From: Godwin Drive

To: Manassas City Limits - west

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $13,778

Agency Proj. ID: 96721

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3219

VA 28- widening project

Facility: VA 28

From: VA 652 (Fitzwater Dr)

To: S. Infantry Lane

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $25,400

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3217

VA 28, Widen

Facility: VA 28

From: Fauquier County Line

To: Pennsylvania Avenue

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $70,900

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2045

VA 7, Widen

Facility: VA 7 Bypass

From: VA 7 Leesburg Pike West

To: US 15 South King Street (South)

Complete In: 2035

Cost: $54,711

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1870

VA 7, Widen

Facility: VA 7 Leesburg Pike

From: Seven Corners

To: Bailey's Crossroads

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $34,318

Agency Proj. ID: 3164

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2175

VA 7, Widen, Upgrade

Facility: VA 7 Leesburg Pike

From: VA 7 Leesburg Bypass /US 15 East

To: I 495 Capital Beltway

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $49,319

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2105

VA Route 7/VA Route 659 Interchange

Facility: VA 7 Interchange

From: VA 659 Belmont Ridge Road

To:

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $65,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2664

Vint Hill Road widening to 4 lanes

Facility: VA 215 Vint Hill Road

From: VA 1566 Sudley Manor Drive

To: Kettle Run

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $16,000

Agency Proj. ID: 104554

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3551

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 149

Page 153: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Widen Rte 1 from Telegraph Rd (Fairfax County) to Annapolis Way (Prince William Cnty)

Facility: US 1 Jefferson Davis Highway

From: Lorton Road (fairfax County)

To: Annapolis Way (Prince William Country)

Complete In: 2035

Cost: $125,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3180

Widen VA 123, Chain Bridge Road from VA 7 to I-495

Facility: VA 123 Chain Bridge Road

From: 7 Leesburg Pike

To: 495 Capital Beltway

Complete In: 2021

Cost: $22,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3376

Widening of Rte 15 (James Madison Highway)

Facility: US 15 James Madison Highway

From: Thoroughfare Road

To: 1200' South of RR Tracks

Complete In: 2024

Cost: $45,000

Agency Proj. ID: T17496

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3162

StudyPrimary Projects

US 50 (Seven Corners Interchange)

Facility: US 50 Arlington Boulevard

From: Patrick Henry Drive

To: South Street

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $3,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3477

VA 28 Centreville Road (widen from 4-6 lanes divided)

Facility: VA 28 Centreville Road

From: VA 898 Old Centreville Road

To: Prince William County Line

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $68,829

Agency Proj. ID: 108720

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3479

VA Route 28 Study

Facility: VA 28

From: VA 234 Sudley Road

To: I 66

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $2,501

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3383

Operational ProgramPrimary Projects

Centreville Road Imrovements

Facility: US 28 Centreville Road

From: Liberia Road

To: Phoenix Dr.

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $300

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3635

Roundabout Sudley/Centreville

Facility: VA 28 Centreville Street

From: VA 234 Sudley Road

To:

Complete In: 2024

Cost: $7,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3629

Rt. 28 Manasssas Bypass

Facility: Manassas Bypass

From: VA 234 Sudley Road

To: VA 28 Centreville Road

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $228,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1865

OtherPrimary Projects

Intersection Improvements RTE 15/29/Arrow Leaf Turn Lee Hwy RSFY15

Facility: US 29 Lee Highway

From: 400' East of the intersection with Arrow Leaf Turn

To: 400' West of the intersection with Arrow Leaf Turn

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $1,189

Agency Proj. ID: 105807

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3491

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 150

Page 154: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

System ExpansionSecondary Projects

Arcola Boulevard (Center Segment)

Facility: Arcola Boulevard

From: Dulles West Boulevard

To: Evergreen Mills Road

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $9,526

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3308

Arcola Boulevard (Northern Segment)

Facility: VA 606 Arcola Boulevard

From: Evergreen Mills Road

To: Loudoun County Parkway

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $3,546

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3307

Arcola Boulevard (Southern Segment)

Facility: VA 606 Arcola Boulevard

From: Dulles West Boulevard

To: U.S. 50

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $54,928

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3306

Balls Ford Road- Widening from 2 to 4 lanes

Facility: VA 621 Balls Ford Road

From: VA Sudley Road

To: VA 622 Groveton Drive

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $67,405

Agency Proj. ID: T20903

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3377

Boone Boulevard Extension (Rt 123 t Ashgrove)

Facility: Boone Boulevard

From: VA 123 Chain Bridge Road

To: Ashgrove Lane

Complete In: 2036

Cost: $126,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3150

Braddock Rd

Facility: VA 620 Braddock Rd

From: VA 7100 Fairfax County Parkway

To: VA Ox Road

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $16,710

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2158

Braddock Road – Route 659 to Fairfax County Line

Facility: VA 620 Braddock Road

From: VA 659 Gum Spring Road

To: Fairfax County Line

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $154,760

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3604

Braddock Road – Route 659 to Royal Hunter Drive

Facility: VA 620 Braddock Road

From: VA 659 Gun Spring Road

To: Royal Hunter Drive

Complete In: 2027

Cost: $6,095

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3605

Braddock/ Summerall/ Supreme Intersection Improvements

Facility: VA 620 Braddock Road

From: Summerall Drive (VA 1257) / Supreme Road (VA 1258)

To:

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $4,421

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3606

Catharpin Road, Widen

Facility: VA 676 Catharpin Road

From: VA 55 John Marshall Highway

To: Heathcote Boulevard

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $9,150

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1754

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 151

Page 155: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Claiborne Parkway Extension

Facility: Claiborne Parkway

From: Croson Road

To: Ryan Road

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $7,000

Agency Proj. ID: 102858

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3067

Croson Lane – Claiborne Parkway to Old Ryan Road

Facility: VA 645 Croson Lane

From: VA 901 Claiborne Parkway

To: VA 772 Old Ryan Road

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $21,270

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3607

Crosstrail Boulevard

Facility: VA 653 Crosstrail Boulevard

From: Sycolin Road

To: eastern boundary of county-owned property

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $70,300

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3310

Dulles West Blvd. Phase I

Facility: Dulles West Blvd

From: Dulles Landing Drive

To: Hutchinson Farm Drive

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $14,700

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3313

Dulles West Blvd.Phase II

Facility: Dulles West Blvd.

From: Hutchinson Drive

To: Arcola Blvd.

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $43,700

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3314

Evergreen Mills Road (Western Segment)

Facility: Evergreen Mills Road

From: Arcola Boulevard

To: Shreveport Drive

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $10,355

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3312

Fairfax County Parkway Improvements

Facility: VA 286 Fairfax County Parkway

From: VA 123 Ox Road

To: VA Dulles Toll Road)

Complete In: 2035

Cost: $295,888

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2106

Franconia-Springfield Parkway (and SOV)

Facility: VA 289 Franconia-Springfield Parkway

From: VA 7100 Fairfax County Parkway

To: VA 2677 Frontier Drive

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $16,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1833

Gallows Road Widening (Rt 7 to Prosperity Avenue

Facility: VA 650 Gallows Road

From: VA 7 Leesburg Pike

To: VA Prosperity Avenue

Complete In: 2038

Cost: $94,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3156

Greensboro Drive Extension (Spring Hill to Tyco)

Facility: VA Greensboro Drive

From: VA Spring Hill Road

To: VA Tyco Road

Complete In: 2034

Cost: $58,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3155

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 152

Page 156: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Gum Spring Rd.

Facility: VA 659 Gum Spring Rd.

From: Prince William County Line

To: US

Complete In: 2035

Cost: $17,500

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1818

Jones Branch Dr. Connector

Facility: VA 3102 Scotts Crossing Rd

From: 123 Dolley Madison Blvd

To: Jones Branch Dr

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $58,840

Agency Proj. ID: 103907

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3060

Joplin Rd/Fuller Rd Quantico base access improvements

Facility: VA 619 FUller Road/Joplin Road

From: I-95 Ramp

To: Fuller Heights Rd

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $8,043

Agency Proj. ID: 92999

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3187

Loudoun County Parkway Widening

Facility: VA 607 Loudoun County Parkway

From: US 50

To: Route 606

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $10,828

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3315

Loudoun County Pkwy

Facility: VA 607 Loudoun County Pkwy

From: VA 620 Braddock Road @ VA 613

To: VA Harry Byrd Highway

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $11,470

Agency Proj. ID: 107953

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1878

Magarity Road Widening from Rt 7 (Leesburg Pike) to Great Falls Street

Facility: Magarity Road

From: VA 7 Leesburg Pike

To: VA Great Falls Street

Complete In: 2037

Cost: $63,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3158

McGraws Corner Drive

Facility: McGraws Corner Drive Parallel

From: US 29 Lee Highway

To: US 15 James Madison Highway

Complete In: 2040

Cost: $208,800

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1985

Moorefield Boulevard – Mooreview Parkway to Moorefield Station

Facility: Moorefield Boulevard

From: VA 2298 Mooreview Parkway

To: Moorefield Boulevard

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $4,600

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3602

Neabsco Mills Road widen to 4 lanes

Facility: VA 638 Neabsco Mills Road

From: 1 Jefferson Davis Highway

To: Smoke Court

Complete In: 2023

Cost: $35,000

Agency Proj. ID: 107947

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3374

New Braddock Rd.

Facility: VA 620 New Braddock Rd.

From: VA 28

To: US @VA 622 (Stone Rd.) @ VA 662 (Stone Rd.)

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $0

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2206

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 153

Page 157: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

New Guinea Road, Construct

Facility: VA 651 New Guinea Road

From: VA 123 Ox Road

To: Roberts Road

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $20,677

Agency Proj. ID: 15132

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1748

NewTelegraph Rd/Summit School Road

Facility: VA 1781 NewTelegraph Rd/Summit School Road

From: VA 849 Caton Hill

To: VA Minnieville Rd.

Complete In: 2040

Cost: $35,962

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1921

Northstar Boulevard (Missing Link #79)

Facility: VA 659 Northstar Boulevard Relocated

From: Shreveport Drive

To: U.S. 50

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $12,000

Agency Proj. ID: 106994

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3318

Potomac Shores

Facility: VA 234 Potomac Shores Parkway

From: US 1 Jefferson Davis Highway

To: Potomac Shores Parkway

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $10,941

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3480

Prentice Drive (EasternSegment)

Facility: VA 1071 Prentice Drive

From: Lockridge

To: Loudoun County Parkway

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $26,300

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3321

Prentice Drive (Western Segment)

Facility: VA 1071 Prentice Drive

From: Loudoun County Parkway

To: Loudoun Station Drive

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $36,700

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3320

Reconstruct and widen Rte. 659 - Belmont Ridge Road

Facility: VA 659 Belmont Ridge Rd.

From: 267 Croson Ln

To: Harry Byrd Highway

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $80,000

Agency Proj. ID: 76243, 762

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2938

Rippon Boulevard Extension

Facility: VA 1392 Rippon Boulevard Extension

From: US 1 Jefferson Davis Highway

To: Rippon VRE Station

Complete In: 2040

Cost: $28,600

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2008

River Heritage Boulevard

Facility: VA 4700 River Heritage Boulevard

From: Dominica Drive

To: Potomac Shores Parkway

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $5,357

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3481

River Heritage Boulevard widening

Facility: VA 4700 River Heritage Boulevard

From: Potomac Shores Parkway

To: Dominica Drive

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $3,209

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3482

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 154

Page 158: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Riverside Parkway (VA Route 7 North Collector Road) Extension

Facility: VA 2401 Riverside Parkway

From: VA 607 Loudoun County Parkway

To: VA 2020 Ashburn Village Boulevard Extension

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $15,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3501

Rolling Road Widening

Facility: Rolling Road

From: Rt 5297 DeLong Road

To: Rt 4502 .01mi. N. of Fullerton Rd.

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $25,500

Agency Proj. ID: 102905

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3301

Rollins Ford Road Extension

Facility: Rollins Ford Road

From: Linton Hall Road

To: Wellington Road

Complete In: 2040

Cost: $44,231

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3293

Route 7 George Washington Boulevard Overpass

Facility: VA 1050 George Washington Boulevard Overpass

From: George Washington Boulevard

To: Richfield Street

Complete In: 2023

Cost: $28,000

Agency Proj. ID: 105584

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3327

Route 772 Transit Station Connector Bridge

Facility: VA 772 Transit Station Bridge

From: Dulles Greenway

To: Route 772 Transit Station

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $16,900

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3323

Rte 638 - Widen to 4 Lanes

Facility: VA 638 Pohick Road

From: US 1

To: I

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $12,456

Agency Proj. ID: 16505

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2645

Rte 659 - Belmont Ridge Road Reconstruction to four lanes

Facility: VA 659 Belmont Ridge Road - Loudoun County

From: Hay Road

To: 0.23MI N. Gloucester Parkway

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $61,000

Agency Proj. ID: 76244

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3034

Russell Branch Parkway (Western Segment)

Facility: VA 1061 Russell Branch Parkway

From: Belmont Bridge Road

To: Tournament Drive

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $16,400

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3324

Shirley Gate Road Extension & Intyerchange with Fairfax County Parkway with NO connections withPopes

Facility: VA 655 Shirley Gate Road Extension (on new alignment)

From: VA 620 Braddock Road

To: VA 286 Fairfax County Parkway

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $129,650

Agency Proj. ID: #1 & #18

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3468

Shreveport Drive (Western Segment)

Facility: VA 621 Shreveport Drive

From: Evergreen Mills Road

To: Belmont Ridge Road

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $12,400

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3326

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 155

Page 159: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Soapstone Drive 4-Lane Overpass

Facility: VA 4720 Soapstone Drive

From: VA 5320 Sunrise Valley Drive

To: VA 675 Sunset Hills Drive

Complete In: 2027

Cost: $2,500

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3450

South 12th Street Extension

Facility: S 12th Street

From: S Glebe Road

To: S Monroe Street

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $1,200

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3657

Sterling Boulevard Extension

Facility: VA 846 Sterling Boulevard Extension

From: Pacific Boulevard

To: Moran Road

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $12,400

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3329

Stringfellow Rd.

Facility: VA 645 Stringfellow Rd.

From: VA 7100 Fairfax County Parkway

To: US 50

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $25,800

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1859

Telegraph Road widen

Facility: VA 1781 Telegraph Road

From: VA 294 Prince William Parkway

To: VA Caton Hill Road

Complete In: 2024

Cost: $11,200

Agency Proj. ID: 104802

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1837

University Boulevard Extension

Facility: VA 840 University Boulevard

From: Sudley Manor Drive

To: Devlin

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $33,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3292

University Boulevard Extension 2

Facility: VA 840 University Blvd

From: Devlin Road

To: Progress Court

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $100,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3470

VA 2190 Summit School Road Extension

Facility: VA 2190 Summit School Road Extension

From: Telegraph Road

To: VA 2190 Summit School Road (south end of existing)

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $11,400

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3227

VA 294 Prince William Parkway Improvements

Facility: VA 294 Prince William Parkway

From: VA 642 Hoadly Road

To: Liberia Avenue

Complete In: 2040

Cost: $263,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2718

VA 602 Reston Parkway Improvements

Facility: VA 602 Reston Pkwy.

From: VA 5320 Sunrise Valley Drive

To: VA Baron Cameron Avenue

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $52,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1849

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 156

Page 160: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

VA 608, Frying Pan Road Widening

Facility: va 608 Frying Pan Road

From: VA 28 Sully Road

To: VA 657 Centreville Road

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $54,350

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3475

VA 611 Telegraph Road Widening

Facility: VA 611 Telegraph Road

From: US 1

To: VA Franconia Road

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $24,868

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2186

VA 613 Van Dorn Interchange at VA 644 Franconia Road PE COMPLETE

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $2,196

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3275

VA 636 Hooes Road

Facility: VA 636 Hooes Road

From: VA 286 Fairfax County Parkway

To: VA 600 Silverbrook Road

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $20,550

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3478

VA 638 Rolling Road Widening

Facility: VA 638 Rolling Road

From: VA 6945 Hunter Village Drive

To: VA Old Keene Mill Road

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $31,139

Agency Proj. ID: 5559

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1936

VA 643 Sycolin Road Paving/Widening

Facility: VA 643 Sycolin Road

From: Leesburg Town Limits

To: VA Belmont Ridge Road

Complete In: 2035

Cost: $50,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2209

VA 659 Belmont Ridge Road, Reconstruct

Facility: VA 659 Belmont Ridge Road Relocated

From: Prince William County Line

To: VA

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $34,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1897

VA Route 606 Ramp

Facility: VA 606 Ramp

From: VA 606 Eastbound

To: Lockridge Road northbound

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $10,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3355

VA Route 643 Extended - Shellhorn Road

Facility: VA 643 Shellhorn Road Extension

From: VA 606 Loudoun County Parkway

To: VA 634 Moran Road

Complete In: 2024

Cost: $127,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3502

VA Route 645 Extended - Westwind Drive

Facility: VA 645 Westwind Drive Extended

From: VA 607 Loudoun County Parkway (opposite Moorefield Boulevard)

To: VA 606 Old Ox Road

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $44,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3499

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 157

Page 161: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

VA Route 7 Interchange at VA Route 690

Facility: VA 7 Interchange

From: VA 690

To:

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $35,700

Agency Proj. ID: 111666

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3331

Van Buren Road - construct a four lane facility

Facility: VA 627 Van Buren Road

From: 234 Dumfries Road

To: 610 Cardinal Drive

Complete In: 2035

Cost: $93,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3372

Washington Boulevard Widening

Facility: Washington Boulevard

From: Wilson

To: Kirkwood

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $3,800

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2830

Waxpool Road/ Loudoun County Parkway Intersection Improvements

Facility: Waxpool Road

From: Loudoun County Parkway

To:

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $5,147

Agency Proj. ID: 111674

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3333

Wellington Road

Facility: VA 674 Wellington Road

From: VA 619 Linton Hall Road Relocated

To: VA Rixlew Lane

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $20,556

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2145

Widen Balls Ford Rd

Facility: VA 621 Balls Ford Road

From: Devlin Road

To: 234 Sudley Road

Complete In: 2035

Cost: $53,564

Agency Proj. ID: 80347

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2357

Widen Farmwell Road between Smith Switch and Ashburn Road

Facility: Farmwell Road

From: Smith Switch

To: Ashburn Road

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $7,000

Agency Proj. ID: 106996

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3443

Williamson Boulevard

Facility: Williamson Boulevard

From: VA 1566 Sudley Manor Drive

To: VA Portsmouth Road)

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $3,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2176

System MaintenanceSecondary Projects

Evergreen Mills Road (Eastern Segment)

Facility: VA 621 Evergreen Mills Road

From: Loudoun County Parkway

To: Arcola Boulevard

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $19,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3311

Rogues Road Reconstruction

Facility:

From: Prince William County Line

To: RT 605

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $9,390

Agency Proj. ID: 104300

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3487

StudySecondary Projects

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 158

Page 162: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Braddock Road

Facility: VA 620 Braddock Road

From: I 495 I-495

To: VA Burke Lake Road

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $800

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1857

Town Center Parkway Underpass Study

Facility: Town Center Parkway

From: Sunrise Valley Drive

To: Sunset Hills Road

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $500

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3476

Operational ProgramSecondary Projects

Route 287 / Route 9 Intersection Improvements

Facility: VA 9 Charles Town Parkway

From: VA 287 Berlin Turnpike

To:

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $12,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3486

OtherSecondary Projects

Crystal City Streets Program

Facility: Multiple local streets

From: Crystal City

To:

Complete In: 2026

Cost: $87,601

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3656

EDSALL ROAD WALKWAY

Facility: VA 648 EDSALL ROAD

From: Cherokee Avenue

To: 200 feet N of Beryl Road (0.5000 MI)

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $4,000

Agency Proj. ID: 110740

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3563

Mooreview Parkway (Missing Link)

Facility: VA 2298 Mooreview Parkway

From: Amberleigh Farm Drive

To: Old Ryan Road

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $6,300

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3316

System ExpansionUrban Projects

Battlefield Parkway, Construct

Facility: Battlefield Parkway

From: US 15 South of Leesburg

To: US Bypass north

Complete In: 2016

Cost: $45,000

Agency Proj. ID: 18992

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2139

East Elden Street (widening)

Facility: East Elden Street

From: Monroe Street

To: Herndon Parkway onto Fairfax County Parkway

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $43,995

Agency Proj. ID: 50100

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3222

Edwards Ferry Road at Route 15 Bypass Interchange

Facility: US 15 Rt 15 Bypass

From:

To: VA Edwards Ferry Road

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $27,000

Agency Proj. ID: 89890

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2671

Eisenhower Valley Access and Circulation Improvements

Facility: Eisenhower Valley Access and Circulation Improvements

From: City of Alexandria

To:

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $70,046

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1783

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 159

Page 163: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Evergreen Mill Road Widening

Facility: Evergreen Mill Road

From: Rt 15 S. King Street

To: South City Limits

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $11,300

Agency Proj. ID: 104830

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3300

Grant Avenue Road Diet

Facility: VA 234 Grant Avenue

From: Lee AVenue

To: Wellington Road

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $11,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3375

Herndon Parkway Intersection at Van Buren Street Improvements (to include ped/bike connectivity)

Facility: Herndon Parkway

From: Van Buren

To:

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $3,000

Agency Proj. ID: 89889

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3469

King and Beauregard Intersection Improvements, Phases 1 and 2

Facility: VA 7 King/Bearegard Intersection Improvements

From: 0.05 mi N of Beauregard St

To: 0.19 mi S of Beauregard St.

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $17,900

Agency Proj. ID: 8645 107

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3174

Spring Street Widen 4 to 6 lanes, intersection & ramp impv., sidewalks

Facility: Spring Street

From: Herndon Parkway East

To: Fairfax County Parkway

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $10,500

Agency Proj. ID: 105521

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1952

Sycolin Road

Facility: Sycolin Road

From: VA/US 7/15 Leesburg Bypass

To: SCL of Leesburg

Complete In: 2015

Cost: $13,500

Agency Proj. ID: 78853

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2073

Widen Liberia Avenue

Facility: Liberia Avenue

From: VA 28

To: PW Parkway Rt 294

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $63,000

Agency Proj. ID: 102903

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2876

System MaintenanceUrban Projects

VA 17 Intersection Improvements in Warrenton

Facility: VA 17

From: Frost Avenue south of

To: Winchester Street south of

Complete In: 2021

Cost: $668

Agency Proj. ID: 76408

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3441

Operational ProgramUrban Projects

Seminary Road & Beauregard Street Ellipse

Facility: Seminary Road/ Beauregard St. Intersection

From:

To:

Complete In: 2028

Cost: $35,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3175

OtherUrban Projects

Convert 27th Street South to 2-way

Facility: 27th Street South

From: US 1

To: Crystal Drive

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $1

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3677

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 160

Page 164: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Farrington Aveneue

Facility: New road

From: Van Dorn Street at Eisenhower Avenue

To: Edsall Road

Complete In: 2035

Cost: $30,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3286

Remove South Clark Street

Facility: South Clark Street

From: 12th Street South

To: 18th Street South

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $1

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3678

Wellington Rd. Overpass Phase III

Facility: Wellington Road

From: Dean Drive

To: Dean Park Lane

Complete In: 2040

Cost: $60,000

Agency Proj. ID: 104374

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3402

System ExpansionBike/Ped Projects

Backlick Run Multi-use trail Phase 1

Facility: Backlick Run Multi-use trail

From: From Booth Park Base Ball field

To: Van Dorn St.

Complete In: 2023

Cost: $7,163

Agency Proj. ID: 111469

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3612

Capital Bikeshare

Facility: Citywide

From:

To:

Complete In: 2024

Cost: $750

Agency Proj. ID: 106958

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3614

Four Mile Run Trail expansion

Facility:

From: Route 1

To: Mt Vernon Trail

Complete In: 2040

Cost: $750

Agency Proj. ID: 103595

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3616

Holmes Run Trail Connector

Facility: Holmes Run Trail

From: N. Ripley St.

To: S. Pickett St.

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $1,286

Agency Proj. ID: 111401

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3617

HOT Lanes Bicycle/Pedestrians Facilities Phase II

Facility: I 495

From: Springfield Interchange

To: Old Dominion Drive

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $1,775

Agency Proj. ID: 104005

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3259

Old Cameron Run Trail Construction

Facility: Old Cameron Run Trail

From: Mt. Vernon Trail

To: Eisenhower Ave Trail

Complete In: 2021

Cost: $54

Agency Proj. ID: 855755

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3618

Potomac Yard Trail Expansion

Facility: Potomac Yard Trail

From: E. Glebe Road

To: Four Mile Run

Complete In: 2021

Cost: $736

Agency Proj. ID: 80434

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3624

OtherBike/Ped Projects

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 161

Page 165: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Mt. Vernon Trail at East Abingdon Dr.

Facility: Mt. Vernon Trail at East Abingdon Dr.

From: Between end of Mt. Vernon trail north of Slaters Ln.

To: Norfolk Southern Tracks south of Slaters Ln.

Complete In: 2024

Cost: $540

Agency Proj. ID: 105300

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3623

Project Grouping for Construction: Recreational Trails

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $6,712

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3498

System ExpansionBridge Projects

Frontier Drive Extension plus Braided Ramps

Facility: VA 2677 Frontier Drive

From: Franconia -Springfield Transportation Center

To: VA 789 Loisdale Road

Complete In: 2024

Cost: $84,500

Agency Proj. ID: 106742

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3460

Rock Hill Road Overpass

Facility:

From: 5320 Sunrise Valley Drive

To: 209 Innovation Avenue

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $82,696

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3609

South Lakes Drive 4-Lane Overpass

Facility: VA 5329 South Lakes Drive

From: VA 5320 Sunrise Valley Drive

To: VA 675 Sunset Hills Road

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $500

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3451

System MaintenanceBridge Projects

Project Grouping: Construction: Bridge Rehabilitation/Replacement/Reconstruction

Facility: NoVA District Bridges

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $116,483

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2693

TIP Grouping for Preventive Maintenance for Bridges

Facility: Bridges

From: NoVA District

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $148,783

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2699

StudyBridge Projects

Rockhills 4-lane Overpass

Facility:

From: VA 605 Sunrise Valley Drive

To: VA 868 Davis Drive Extension

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $500

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3449

OtherBridge Projects

Multimodal Bridge to Van Dorn Metro Station

Facility:

From: Eisenhower Avenue

To: S. Pickett Street

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $40,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3284

System ExpansionEnhancement Projects

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 162

Page 166: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

VA 294 Prince William Pkwy Interchange at Smoketown Road

Facility: VA 294 Prince William Parkway

From:

To:

Complete In: 2040

Cost: $100,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3670

System MaintenanceEnhancement Projects

Colechester Road (paving dirt road)

Facility: VA 612 Colchester Road

From: VA 641 Chapel Road

To: VA 641 0.24 mile northwest of VA 641

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $445

Agency Proj. ID: 76256

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3385

OtherEnhancement Projects

TIP Grouping project for Construction: Transportation Enhancement Byway Non-Traditional

Facility: Enhancement projects

From: NoVA District

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $667,918

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2697

Operational ProgramITS Projects

ITS Integration Phase IV

Facility: City-wide

From:

To:

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $1,918

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3610

TIP Grouping project for Maintenance: Traffic and Safety Operations

Facility: Traffic and Safety Operations

From: NoVA District

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $460,491

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2700

Traffic Adaptive Signal Control Fiber Optic

Facility: City-wide

From:

To:

Complete In: 2024

Cost: $7,676

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3611

StudyOther Projects

Embark Richmond Highway (Study)

Facility: US 1 Richmond Highway

From:

To:

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $800

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3541

Evaluation of Significant Projects that can ease Congestion

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $600

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3148

Washington, D.C. to Richmond Southeast High Speed Rail (DC2RVA) Project

Facility: RF&P Subdivision, CSX Transportation System

From: CF 110 CSX Long Bridge, Arlington County

To: CF Junction of North End and Bellwood Subdivisions, CSX Transportation System (Centr

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $55,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3628

Operational ProgramOther Projects

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 163

Page 167: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

BRAC/Economic Development

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $3,316

Agency Proj. ID: 81738

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2431

Next Generation Fare Collection & Technology

Facility: City-wide

From:

To:

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $1,200

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3622

TIP Grouping project for Construction: Safety/ITS/Operational Improvements

Facility: Safety/ITS/Operational Facilities

From: District-wide

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $2,478,654

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2695

OtherOther Projects

Virginia Statewide Vehicle Fuel Conversion Program

Facility: Statewide

From:

To:

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $25,740

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3139

OtherCMAQ Projects

BUS REPLACEMENT (OMNIRIDE EXPRESS COMMUTER BUSES)

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $11,978

Agency Proj. ID: T21459

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3685

COMMUTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $34,533

Agency Proj. ID: T21240

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3682

FAIRFAX COUNTYWIDE TRANSIT STORES

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $3,760

Agency Proj. ID: T21448

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3683

PRTC COMMUTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $2,050

Agency Proj. ID: T21457

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3684

TRANSIT STORE FUNDING - Alexandria

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $1

Agency Proj. ID: T21453

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3681

WMATA REPLACEMENT BUSES

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $3,700

Agency Proj. ID: T21033

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3686

OtherFederal Lands Highway Pro

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 164

Page 168: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Project Grouping:Construction : Federal Lands Highway

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $250

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3494

System MaintenanceMaintenance Projects

TIP Grouping project for Preventive Maintenance and System Preservation

Facility: Preventive Maintenance and System Preservation Facilities

From: NoVA District

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $1,006,098

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2698

System ExpansionTransit Projects

Arkendale to Powell’s Creek Third Track Project and Potomac Shores Station

Facility: Third Track

From: CFP 72 Arkendale, Stafford County VA

To: CFP 83.4 Powell's Creek, Prince William VA

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $26,559

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2831

Ballston Multimodal Improvements

Facility: Ballston Metro Station

From: Fairfax Drive at Stuart Street

To:

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $4,843

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3660

Ballston-MU Metro Station West Entrance

Facility: Ballston Metro station

From:

To: Fairfax Drive at N Vermont Street

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $104,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3633

Citywide Bus Shelters

Facility: Citywide

From:

To:

Complete In: 2024

Cost: $2,200

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3613

Crystal City Potomac Yard BRT Expansion

Facility: Portion of Route 1, Evans Lane, and Potomac Avenue

From: E. Glebe Road

To: S. Glebe Road (Arlington)

Complete In: 2040

Cost: $1,205

Agency Proj. ID: T1117

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3615

Crystal City Potomac Yard Transitway Northern Extension

Facility: Crystal City Transitway

From: Crystal City Metro Station

To: Pentagon City Metro Station

Complete In: 2023

Cost: $24,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3521

DASH Facility & Fleet Expansion Project

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $11,134

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3620

Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project

Facility:

From: East Falls Church Metrorail Station

To: VA Loudoun County)

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $2,937,421

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1981

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 165

Page 169: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project Phase II

Facility: VA 267 Dulles Toll Road

From:

To:

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $20,160

Agency Proj. ID: 97226

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2982

Fairfax Connector Bus Service Expansion

Facility: Fairfax Connector Bus Service Expansion

From: Countywide

To:

Complete In: 2021

Cost: $0

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2673

Herndon Metrorail Intermodal Access Improvements

Facility: VA Herndon Parkway

From: VA 666 Van Buren Street (East of)

To: VA Spring Street (West of )

Complete In: 2021

Cost: $1,600

Agency Proj. ID: 104328 or

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3166

Landmark Transit Center

Facility: Landmark Transit Center

From: Van Dorn St.

To: DUke Street

Complete In: 2032

Cost: $25,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3071

PRTC - Bus Acquisition / Replacement Program

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $126,583

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2172

TIP Grouping project for Construction: Rail

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $7,707

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2694

US 1 Bus Rapid Transit

Facility: US 1 Richmond Highway BRT

From: N. Kings Highway at Huntington Metro

To: Fort Belvoir

Complete In: 2030

Cost: $504,900

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3496

VRE - Rolling Stock Acquisition

Facility: VRE Systemwide

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $662,155

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2163

VRE Service Improvements (Reduce Headways)

Facility: Fredericksburg and Manassas lines

From:

To:

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $105,013

Agency Proj. ID: 113526

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2832

West End Transitway

Facility: Van Dorn Metrorail Station

From: Van Dorn Metrorail Station

To: Pentagon Metrorail Station

Complete In: 2024

Cost: $140,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2930

System MaintenanceTransit Projects

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 166

Page 170: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Eisenhower Metrorail Station

Facility: Eisenhower Ave. and Swamp Fox Rd

From:

To:

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $8,500

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3134

PRTC - Captial Cost of Contracting

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $87,912

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2747

PRTC - Rehabilitate / Rebuild OmniRide Buses

Facility: OmniRide Buses

From: Prince William County

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $106,985

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2714

VRE - Stations and Facilities

Facility:

From: Systemwide

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $650,002

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2164

VRE - Tracks and Storage Yards

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $1,324,447

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1996

VRE Track Lease Improvements

Facility: VRE Tracks

From: Systemwide

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $685,430

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2684

StudyTransit Projects

Duke Street BRT Design & Construction

Facility: Duke Street BRT

From: King Street Metro Station

To: Landmark (Possibly CIty of Fairfax)

Complete In: 2027

Cost: $19,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2932

VRE Grant and Project Management

Facility:

From: Systemwide

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $17,550

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1908

Operational ProgramTransit Projects

CSX RF &P Rail Corridor Third Track

Facility:

From: CF 577 Hamilton Interlocking (HA), Spotsylvania

To: CF 1063 Slaters Lane Interlocking, Alexandria

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $104,160

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3016

DASH Real-Time Information Enhancement Project

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $610

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3619

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 167

Page 171: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Dulles Town Center Park and Ride Lot

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $5,250

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3361

Franconia-Springfield Parkway Park-and-Ride Lots

Facility:

From: Franconia-Springfield Pkwy, west of I-95

To:

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $8,875

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1977

Loudoun County Park and Ride Lots, Construct

Facility: Lowes Island

From:

To:

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $280

Agency Proj. ID: 79679

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1960

One Loudoun Park and Ride Lot

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $3,500

Agency Proj. ID: 111470

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3358

Park and Ride Lot at Arcola Center

Facility: Park and Ride Lot

From: Arcola Center

To:

Complete In: 2025

Cost: $5,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2874

Project Grouping :Transit: Ridesharing

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $1,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2944

PRTC Western Facility

Facility: Western PWC

From:

To:

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $47,667

Agency Proj. ID: T20924

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2320

Sterling Park and Ride Lot

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2014

Cost: $100

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3357

Transit Signal Priority on Route 7 and Route 236

Facility: Rt King Street/Duke Street

From: City Line

To: Quaker Ln/Diagonal Rd

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $1,505

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3621

Western Loudoun Park and Ride Lot

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $3,575

Agency Proj. ID: 111470

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3359

OtherTransit Projects

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 168

Page 172: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Columbia Pike Transit Stations

Facility: Columbia Pike

From:

To:

Complete In: 2021

Cost: $13,323

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3659

East Falls Church Metro Station Bus Bay Expansion

Facility: East Falls Church Metro station

From:

To: North side bus bays

Complete In: 2018

Cost: $6,328

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3650

Mark Center

Facility: Mark Center

From: Mark Center Drive

To:

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $4,000

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3625

PRTC Bus Shelter Programs

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2019

Cost: $54

Agency Proj. ID: PRTC0001

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1932

PRTC Security Enhancements

Facility: PRTC Transit Center

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $623

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2805

Springfield Commuter Parking Garage

Facility:

From: Springfield CBD &

To: Engineering Proving Grounds (EPG)

Complete In: 2020

Cost: $63,800

Agency Proj. ID: 106274

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2188

TIP Grouping for Transit Vehicles

Facility: TIP Grouping project for Transit Vehicles

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $300,007

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2900

TIP Grouping project for Transit Access

Facility: TIP Grouping project for Transit Access

From: District-wide

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $308,438

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2711

TIP Grouping project for Transit Amenities

Facility: TIP Grouping project for Transit Amenities

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $20,593

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2712

System ExpansionSafety Projects

Army Navy Country Club Emergency Access Drive

Facility: new access drive

From: Memorial Drive at Army Navy Drive

To: South Queen Street

Complete In: 2023

Cost: $5,150

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3649

Operational ProgramSafety Projects

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 169

Page 173: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Elk Lick Road Intersection Improvements

Facility: VA 621 Elk Lick Drive

From: US 50 John Mosby Highway

To: VA 2200 Tall Cedars Parkway

Complete In: 2023

Cost: $1,654

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3600

Evergreen Mills Road Realignments - Reservoir Road & Watson Road

Facility: VA 621 Evergreen Mills Road

From: VA 860 Watson Road

To: VA 861 Reservoir Road

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $3,815

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3601

Route 50/ Everfield Drive Roundabout

Facility: US 50 John Mosby Highway

From: Everfield Drive

To:

Complete In: 2022

Cost: $7,975

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3603

Region-wideTPB

StudyBike/Ped Projects

Transportation, Community, and System Preservation (TCSP) Program

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In:

Cost:

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3138

Operational ProgramHuman Service Transportat

Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In:

Cost: $0

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3409

JARC and New Freedom Programs

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In:

Cost:

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2612

OtherTransit Projects

TIGER – Priority Bus Transit in the National Capital Region

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In:

Cost: $10,062

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2882

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

System MaintenanceTransit Projects

Maintenance Equipment

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $128,329

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2896

Maintenance Facilities

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $5,738,260

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2779

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 170

Page 174: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

All costs shown in $1,000s

Other Facilities

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $1,401,401

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2781

Passenger Facilities

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $10,923,385

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2782

Project Management and Support

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $691,628

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=874

Rail System Infrastructure Rehabilitation

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $7,995,712

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2881

Systems and Technology

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $4,341,798

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2897

Track & Structures

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $8,788,070

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2787

Vehicles/ Vehicle Parts

Facility:

From:

To:

Complete In: 2045

Cost: $17,667,659

Agency Proj. ID:

CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2894

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 171

Page 175: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

Technical Inputs Solicitation

for the Constrained Element and Air Quality Conformity Analysis of the Visualize 2045 Long-Range Transportation Plan

for the National Capital Region

Submission Guidefor Implementing Agencies

Inputs are due November 15, 2017

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 172

Page 176: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

VISUALIZE 2045 TECHNICAL INPUTS SOLICITATIONSubmission Guide for Implementing Agencies

Approved October 18, 2017

ABOUT THE TPBThe National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (TPB) is the federally designated metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for metropolitan Washington. It is responsible for developing and carrying out a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process in the metropolitan area. Members of the TPB include representatives of the transportation agencies of the states of Maryland and Virginia and the District of Columbia, 24 local governments, the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, the Maryland and Virginia General Assemblies, and nonvoting members from the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority and federal agencies. The TPB is staffed by the Department of Transportation Planning at the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG).

CREDITS Editor: Benjamin HamptonContributing Editors: Andrew Austin, Jane Posey, Lyn EricksonDesign: Remline Corp.

ACCOMMODATIONS POLICYAlternative formats of this document are available upon request. Visit www.mwcog.org/accommodations or call (202) 962-3300 or (202) 962-3213 (TDD).

TITLE VI NONDISCRIMINATION POLICYThe Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG) fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes and regulations prohibiting discrimination in all programs and activities. For more information, to file a Title VI related complaint, or to obtain information in another language, visit www.mwcog.org/nondiscrimination or call (202) 962-3300.

El Consejo de Gobiernos del Área Metropolitana de Washington (COG) cumple con el Título VI de la Ley sobre los Derechos Civiles de 1964 y otras leyes y reglamentos en todos sus programas y actividades. Para obtener más información, someter un pleito relacionado al Título VI, u obtener información en otro idioma, visite www.mwcog.org/nondiscrimination o llame al (202) 962-3300.

Copyright © 2017 by the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments

Visualize 2045 Technical Inputs SolicitationAppendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element |173 171

Page 177: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

Submission Guide for Implementing Agencies

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction .........................................................................................1

Solicitation Schedule ..........................................................................2

Responsible Agencies ..........................................................................3

Project, Program, and Policy Inputs ...................................................4

Financial Inputs ....................................................................................4

Additional Inputs .................................................................................6

Regional Policy Considerations and Evaluation ...............................6

Federal Requirements and Policy Considerations ............................8

Review, Comment, and Approval Process .........................................9

Basic Submission Instructions for Conformity Inputs ................... 10

Resources and Maps ......................................................................... 10

Contact Information .......................................................................... 10

APPENDIX A: Detailed Submission Instructions and Sample

Description Form ...................................................................... A-1

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 174

Page 178: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

Visualize 2045 Technical Inputs Solicitation

7

267

28

85

15

26

194

27

12497

20028

355

295197

450

2024

5

223

210

5225

294

234

286

123

608

28

234

7

75

50

1

29

50

301

1

29

340

40

29

50

15

15

301

66395

495

295

95

95

270

70

495

9566

695

370

Dulles

DCADCA

BWI

Frederick County

Frederick County

Prince WilliamCounty

Prince WilliamCounty

Prince George’sCounty

Prince George’sCounty

CharlesCountyCharlesCounty

Loudoun County

Loudoun County

FairfaxCountyFairfaxCounty

Montgomery County

Montgomery County

ArlingtonCounty

Arlington County

FauquierCounty

Urbanized Area

FauquierCounty

Urbanized Area

ManassasManassas

ManassasPark

ManassasPark

AlexandriaAlexandria

BowieBowie

CollegePark

CollegePark

GreenbeltGreenbeltTakomaPark

TakomaPark

RockvilleRockville

GaithersburgGaithersburg

FrederickFrederick

Fairfax CityFairfax City

Falls Church

LaurelLaurel

ClarkCounty

JeffersonCounty

WashingtonCounty

King GeorgeCounty

St. Mary’s County

AnneArundelCounty

HowardCounty

CarollCounty

CulpeperCounty

SpotsylvaniaCounty

BaltimoreCounty

City of Baltimore

StaffordCountyStaffordCounty

CalvertCountyCalvertCounty

York County

Adams County

FranklinCounty

MARYLAND

VIRGINIA

DC

WESTVIRGINIA

PENNSYLVANIA

P o t o m a c R i v e r

Major Highway

Other Major Roadway

Passenger & Freight Rail Line

MetroRail Lines

Major Airport

Transportation System

Adminstrative Boundaries

State Borders

County & City Lines

TPB Planning Area 5 10 200Miles N

The National Capital Region, as defined by the federal government for the purposes of metropolitan transportation planning, includes the District of Columbia and 22 surrounding counties and cities in Suburban Maryland and Northern Virginia. It encompasses more than 3,500 square miles and a great diversity of development patterns, transportation needs, and economic interests. The region is home to 5.5 million people and 3.2 million jobs.

National Capital Region

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 175

Page 179: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

Submission Guide for Implementing Agencies 1

INTRODUCTIONAbout Visualize 2045Visualize 2045 is the federally required four-year update of the National Capital Region’s long-range transportation plan. It will identify all regionally significant transportation investments planned through 2045 and provide detailed analyses to help decision makers and the public “visualize” the region’s future under current plans.

Visualize 2045 will include both a “Constrained Element” and an “Unconstrained Element.” The Constrained Element will identify the investments agencies expect to be able to afford between now and 2045, while the Unconstrained Element will identify projects that appear in local, state, and regional plans but for which funding has not yet been identified. The Constrained Element is the portion of the plan that was previously known as the Constrained Long-Range Transportation Plan (CLRP). The most recent CLRP was adopted by the TPB in 2014 and amended in 2016.

Like the CLRP had in the past, the Constrained Element of Visualize 2045 will undergo federally required analyses to ensure that it supports the region’s air-quality improvement goals (this is known as Air Quality Conformity) and that sufficient financial resources will be available to implement the projects and programs in it (this is known as Constraint). The TPB will also analyze the future performance of the planned system and assess how well it supports or advances regional goals and priorities.

Technical Inputs SolicitationThe Technical Inputs Solicitation is a formal call for area transportation agencies to submit many of the technical elements that will make up Visualize 2045, including those necessary to perform the required air quality and financial analyses of the Constrained Element. The inputs will also be used to assess the future performance of the planned transportation system.

These analyses take several months to complete. Therefore, the technical inputs must be submitted by November 15, 2017 to ensure that the analyses can be completed and the plan adopted by October 2018.

What’s RequiredTo properly analyze the Constrained Element of Visualize 2045, the TPB must know what regionally significant projects, programs, and policies agencies are planning to implement between now and 2045. Agencies must undertake the following as part of the Technical Inputs Solicitation:

1. Review and update existing projects,programs, and policies

2. Add new projects, programs, and policies

3. Submit updated revenue and expenditureestimates

The following broad categories of inputs are anticipated as part of this Technical Inputs Solicitation:

• Capacity expansion projects

• Operations and maintenance programs

• Transit service and fare assumptions

For each submission, agencies must provide certain project details, including project descriptions, cost and revenue estimates in year of expenditure dollars, and completion dates. Agencies must also identify and describe what federal and regional policy considerations the investments address.

In addition to the transportation projects, programs, and policies called for in this solicitation, the TPB will also be gathering other technical inputs necessary for the analyses, such as updated population, household, and job growth forecasts, and information about the region’s fleet of passenger and commercial vehicles. These inputs are also essential to forecast future travel patterns and vehicle-based emissions under the plan.

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 176

Page 180: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

2 Visualize 2045 Technical Inputs Solicitation

SOLICITATION SCHEDULEThe technical analyses of Visualize 2045 will take several months to complete. To ensure that the analyses are finished in time for the full plan to be adopted by the TPB in October 2018, agencies must submit these technical inputs by November 15, 2017.

A 30-day comment period will provide an opportunity for TPB members, stakeholders, and the public to comment on the projects, programs, policies, and technical assumptions submitted for use in the technical analyses of the plan.

Summer 2017 Staff development of solicitation; initial request for project/program and financial information underway

September 2017 Committee and board review of draft solicitation

October 18, 2017 Solicitation opens, pending board approval

November 15, 2017 Solicitation closes; all inputs are due

December 2017 Committee and board review of draft technical inputs

December 14, 2017 - January 13, 2018 30-day comment period on draft technical inputs

January 17, 2018 Board approval of technical inputs

March 2, 2018 Congestion Management Documentation and FY 2019-2024 TIP Inputs are due

May 10, 2018 Public Forum on the FY 2019-2024 TIP

June/July Staff completes draft Visualize 2045 plan, containing all elements for committee review

September 2018 Committee and board review of Visualize 2045 plan, TIP, and analyses

September 13 - October 13, 2018 30 day comment period on projects, Visualize 2045 plan, TIP, and analyses

October 17, 2018 TPB reviews comments and responses, presented with draft Visualize 2045 plan, Conformity Analysis, and TIP for approval.

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 177

Page 181: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

Submission Guide for Implementing Agencies 3

RESPONSIBLE AGENCIESAny municipal, county, state, regional, or federal agency with the fiscal authority to fund transportation projects

is responsible for providing required project, program, and policy inputs for the Constrained Element of Visualize 2045. Inputs must be submitted by one of the TPB member jurisdictions or agencies listed below.

District of ColumbiaDistrict Department of Transportation (DDOT)

Suburban MarylandMaryland Department of Transportation (MDOT)

State Highway Administration (MDOT SHA)Maryland Transit Administration (MTA)Maryland Transportation Authority (MDTA)

Charles County Department of Public WorksFrederick County Department of Public WorksMontgomery County Department of TransportationPrince George’s County Department of Public Works and TransportationMaryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (M-NNCPPC)City of Frederick Planning DepartmentGaithersburg Public Works DepartmentRockville Public Works DepartmentTakoma Park Public Works Department

Northern VirginiaVirginia Department of Transportation (VDOT)Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (VDRPT)Virginia Railway Express (VRE)Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission (PRTC)Northern Virginia Transportation Authority (NVTA)Northern Virginia Transportation Commission (NVTC)Arlington County Department of Environmental Services*Fairfax County Department of Transportation*Fauquier County Department of Community Development*Loudoun County Department of Transportation and Capital Infrastructure*Prince William County Department of Transportation*City of Alexandria Department of Transportation and Environmental Services*City of Fairfax Department of Public Works*City of Falls Church Department of Public Works*City of Manassas Public Works Department*City of Manassas Park Public Works Department**Virginia local jurisdictions submit through VDOT but are stillresponsible for providing required information

RegionalWashington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA)Eastern Federal Lands Highway DivisionMetropolitan Washington Airports Authority (MWAA)

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 178

Page 182: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

4 Visualize 2045 Technical Inputs Solicitation

PROJECT, PROGRAM, AND POLICY INPUTSTo properly analyze the Constrained Element of Visualize 2045, the TPB must know what projects, programs, and policies agencies are planning to implement between now and 2045. Agencies must undertake the following activities as part of the Technical Inputs Solicitation:

• Review and update existing projects,programs, and policies:Agencies must review all projects, programs, andpolicies in the most recently adopted CLRP andupdate all project information, including projectcosts.

• Add new projects, programs, and policies:Agencies must submit any project, program,or policy not already in the plan that is deemed“regionally significant” as outlined below.

• Submit updated revenue and expenditureestimates:Agencies must submit updated revenue forecastsand estimated expenditure information for theyears 2019-2045 to enable the fiscal constraintanalysis to be performed.

The following broad categories of inputs are required as part of this Technical Inputs Solicitation:

• Capacity expansion projects: Projects that add orremove capacity on the existing highway or transitsystem

• Operations and maintenance programs: New orupdated operations and maintenance programs orupdated cost figures for such programs

• Transit service and fare assumptions: New orupdated route, frequency, and fare information forexisting or planned transit services

For each submission, agencies must provide certain project details, including project descriptions, cost and revenue estimates in year of expenditure dollars, and completion dates. Agencies must also identify and describe what federal and regional policy considerations the investments address.

FINANCIAL INPUTSFederal metropolitan planning regulations require MPOs to develop a financial plan that demonstrates how the adopted long-range transportation plan could be implemented given revenues that are “reasonably expected to be available.” “Financial constraint” or “fiscal constraint” is the analysis performed to demonstrate that the forecast revenues which are reasonably expected to be available through 2045 are able to cover the estimated costs of adequately maintaining, operating, and expanding the highway and transit system in the region through that same timeframe. This analysis will be included in the Financial Element of Visualize 2045.

Currently, an interim financial analysis is being prepared to provide a baseline of anticipated revenues and existing planned expenditures. That analysis is based on projects and programs in the adopted FY2017-2022 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), the 2016 Constrained Long-Range Transportation Plan (CLRP), and the existing Air Quality Conformity Inputs table for both the CLRP and TIP. The inputs provided by the implementing agencies in response to this Technical Inputs Solicitation and for conformity should start from this baseline and adjust their revenues and expenditures to then enable staff to determine financial constraint. The Financial Element will then be finalized as part of the Visualize 2045 long-range plan when submitted for approval by the TPB in October 2018.

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 179

Page 183: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

Submission Guide for Implementing Agencies 5

Roadway Projects

• System Expansion: Increasing systemcapacity by increasing the number oflane-miles of roadway

• System Preservation/State of Good Repair:Major rehabilitation or complete replacementof aging roadways, bridges, technologyand communications systems, and otherinfrastructure as it nears the end of itsuseful lifespan

• Study: Any project that does not have fundingidentified for right-of-way acquisition orconstruction. The study may include multipledesign alternatives. Funding in the TIP ispermitted for project planning or preliminaryengineering only

Transit Projects

• System Expansion: Increasing system capacityby building new transit lines or adding service toexisting lines

• System Preservation/State of Good Repair:Major rehabilitation or complete replacementof aging railcars, buses, rail track, stops andstations, and other infrastructure as it nears theend of its useful lifespan

• Study: Any project that does not have fundingidentified for right-of-way acquisition orconstruction. The study may include multipledesign alternatives. Funding in the TIP ispermitted for project planning or preliminaryengineering only

Bicycle or Pedestrian Projects

• Local Circulation: Projects that support localcirculation within Activity Centers. These caninclude streetscaping, traffic calming, bikeshare,bicycle lanes, sidewalks, and multi-use paths

• Regional Facilities: Multi-jurisdictional projects,projects that improve transit station access, and/or projects that are part of the National CapitalTrail network

Operations and Maintenance Programs

• Day-to-Day Operations and Maintenance: Thiscan include activities like repaving roadways,inspecting and maintaining bridges, clearingsnow and debris, servicing transit vehicles,maintaining and operating traffic signals, andpaying train and bus operators

• Regional programs: This can include programslike regional ridesharing and traveler informationprograms

Transit Service and Fare Assumptions

• Bus transit: New or updated routes, frequencies,and/or fare policies

• Rail transit: New or updated routes, frequencies,and/or fare policies

• HOV/HOT: New or updated lane restrictions and/or hours of operation

Technical Conformity Input CategoriesVisualize 2045 can include any kind of project or program. However, some projects and programs must be included. Per federal requirements, any project that adds roadway or transit capacity—and could therefore affect air quality—must be included, as must any project or program slated to receive federal funding. The plan must also identify the maintenance and operations programs and funding required to keep the system in a state of good repair. Plan inputs typically fall into one of the following categories:

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 180

Page 184: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

ADDITIONAL INPUTSOther inputs that are required in order to perform the Air Quality Conformity Analysis include the following, which are gathered by staff with help from local, state, and other agencies and are not directly required as part of this solicitation:

• Baltimore area project inputs: Projects in theBaltimore Regional Transportation Board (BRTB)long-range transportation plan that are injurisdictions in the TPB Modeled Area.

• Fredericksburg area project inputs: Projects inthe Fredericksburg Area Metropolitan PlanningOrganization (FAMPO) long-range transportationplan that are in jurisdictions in the TPB Modeled Area.

• Calvert-St. Mary’s area project inputs:Projects in the Calvert-St. Mary’s MetropolitanPlanning Organization (C-SMMPO) long-rangetransportation plan that are in jurisdictions in theTPB Modeled Area.

• Land-use forecasts for neighboring areas:Population and employment forecasts forjurisdictions outside the TPB Planning Area but withinthe TPB Modeled Area, including the Baltimore,Fredericksburg, and Calvert-St. Mary’s metropolitanareas and Charles County (MD), Clark and Fauquiercounties (VA), and Jefferson County (WV).

• Census-adjusted employment forecasts:Employment forecasts provided by COG aremodified to reflect the latest Census estimates.

• Other specialized trips: Estimates of external trips,through trips, and specialty-generator trips (e.g.,for major sporting events).

• Vehicle registration information: Make, model, andyear of all registered vehicles, used to calculate theaverage fuel efficiency of the region’s vehicle fleet.

• Non-travel related emissions model inputs:Air temperature and humidity, fuel formulation,and inspection and maintenance program andrequirement information.

• Base-year transit assumptions: Route and scheduleinformation for existing train and bus systems.

• Toll and fare updates: Existing toll and fare policiesand usage, including toll collection methods, facilityuse by vehicle type, and hours of operation andenforcement.

REGIONAL POLICY CONSIDERATIONS AND EVALUATIONVisualize 2045 should strive and aspire to meet the goals and reflect the priorities developed and agreed to by the TPB and its member jurisdictions. To that end, the TPB asks agencies and jurisdictions to “think regionally” as they “act locally” to develop transportation projects, programs, and policies for implementation. This means considering the needs of neighboring jurisdictions and the region as a whole when identifying investment priorities—recognizing that decisions made in one jurisdiction can affect travelers and transportation systems and services elsewhere in the region.

The region’s leaders have come together around a shared vision for the region’s transportation future. That vision focuses on multimodal transportation solutions that give people greater choice in finding the travel mode that works best for them. It also emphasizes the important role of land-use, especially strengthening the region’s Activity Centers by providing high-quality connections between centers and improving non-auto travel options within them. System maintenance is also paramount, recognizing that our existing roadways and transit systems must be in a state of good repair to be safe, efficient, and reliable.

When agencies submit new projects or programs for inclusion in Visualize 2045, they will be asked to document how the initiative supports or advances regional goals and priorities. This information will be shared with the TPB, its committees and subcommittees, and the general public for review and discussion at key points in the plan development process.

Note for agencies: The Visualize 2045 Project Description Form asks for information about how project submissions support or advance regional goals and priorities. These questions must be completed for all new submissions.

6 Visualize 2045 Technical Inputs SolicitationAppendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 181

Page 185: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

Submission Guide for Implementing Agencies 7

Shared Regional Goals and PrioritiesThe six goals below were outlined in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan, adopted by the TPB in 2014. The goals are rooted in the TPB Vision, which was adopted by the TPB in 1998 and serves as the official policy element of Visualize 2045. When agencies submit new projects or programs for inclusion in Visualize 2045, they will be asked to document how the initiatives support or advance these regional goals.

Provide a Comprehensive Range of Travel Options

• Identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports orpromotes

• Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals (i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes,and/or limited English proficiency)?

Promote Regional Activity Centers

• Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?

• Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?

• Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or moreActivity Centers?

Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety

• Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, orsafety?

Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety

• Is this project primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transitwithout building new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?

• Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/orbicyclists?

Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment

• Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteriapollutants?

• Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhousegases?

Support Interregional and International Travel and

Commerce

• Does this project enhance, support, or promote the following freight carrier modes:long-haul truck, local delivery, rail, or air freight carrier modes?

• Does this project enhance, support, or promote the following passenger carriermodes: air, Amtrak intercity passenger rail, intercity bus?

Note: Several TPB and COG policy documents together articulate the region’s shared vision for the future. Refer to the Resources and Maps section for links to these resources online.

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 182

Page 186: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

8 Visualize 2045 Technical Inputs Solicitation

FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS AND POLICY CONSIDERATIONSVisualize 2045 must satisfy a number of federal requirements in order to receive federal approval and for federal funding to flow to transportation projects in our region. The two main requirements are that the plan must:

• Identify all regionally significant projects andprograms for which funding is reasonablyexpected to be available between now and 2045.Regionally significant projects and programs arethose that add or remove capacity on the existingtransportation system.

• Demonstrate that these projects and programstogether support regional air-quality improvementgoals. An official Air Quality Conformity Analysiscarried out by the TPB must show that forecastvehicle-related emissions under the plan will notexceed approved regional limits.

Under federal law, the plan must also address eight federal planning factors, as identified by the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT). (See sidebar)The Constrained Element of Visualize 2045 must meet a number of other federal requirements as well, including non-discrimination and equity, congestion management documentation, public participation, and others. For a full listing of these requirements, refer to the Resources and Maps section of this document.

Performance-Based Planning and ProgrammingThe Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act put forth seven National Goals for Performance-Based Planning and Programming:

1. Safety

2. Infrastructure Condition

3. Congestion Reduction

4. System Reliability

5. Freight Movement and Economic Vitality

6. Environmental Sustainability

7. Reduced Project Delivery Delays

These goals mirror the goals in the TPB Vision and other regional policy documents. The FY 2019-2024 TIP will be used as a tool to monitor and review the region’s performance relative to these goals.

Project and program submissions must:

• Include sufficient detail to be analyzed for air quality impacts and fiscal constraint: The ProjectDescription Form notes all required project details and descriptions.

• Address one or more federal planning factors: Agencies will be asked in the Project SubmissionForm to note which federal planning factors the project or program addresses.

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 183

Page 187: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

Submission Guide for Implementing Agencies 9

1. Support the economic vitality of themetropolitan area, especially by enabling globalcompetitiveness, productivity, and efficiency;

2. Increase the safety of the transportation systemfor all motorized and non-motorized users;

3. Increase the ability of the transportation systemto support homeland security and to safeguardthe personal security of all motorized andnon-motorized users;

4. Increase accessibility and mobility of peopleand freight;

5. Protect and enhance the environment, promoteenergy conservation, improve the qualityof life, and promote consistency betweentransportation improvements and Stateand local planned growth and economicdevelopment patterns;

6. Enhance the integration and connectivity ofthe transportation system, across and betweenmodes, for people and freight;

7. Promote efficient system management andoperation;

8. Emphasize the preservation of the existingtransportation system;

9. Improve resiliency and reliability of thetransportation system and reduce or mitigatestormwater impacts of surface transportation(New under the FAST Act); and

10. Enhance travel and tourism. (New under theFAST Act)

Federal Planning FactorsFederal law also identifies a list of planning factors meant to guide metropolitan transportation planning. Collectively, the projects, programs, and policies in Visualize 2045 must address these factors. Agencies will therefore be asked to identify which of the federal planning factors their submissions address.

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 184

Page 188: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

10 Visualize 2045 Technical Inputs Solicitation

Purpose of Committee and Board ReviewIt is TPB’s responsibility to approve project, program, and policy submissions for inclusion in the long-range plan. These initiatives have typically undergone extensive local development and review, however, the TPB and its committees play an important review role. Their tasks are to:

• Become acquainted with project and program details

• Ensure key questions are answered and details are provided

• Ensure consistency with locally adopted plans and priorities

• Ensure that sufficient local input from the public and local officials has been provided

• Discuss whether and how submissions support regional policy goals and priorities

The TPB will vote on aspects of Visualize 2045 at two key points in the plan development process. The first will come in January 2018, when the board will be asked to approve the technical inputs. The board will vote again in October 2018 on final adoption of the full plan.

REVIEW, COMMENT, AND APPROVAL PROCESSThe draft technical inputs will undergo a process of review, comment, and approval before they are used in the federally required Air Quality Conformity Analysis and other analyses of the plan. The steps of this process are outlined below.

Staff Review November 2017

Staff will review the draft inputs and work with submitting agencies to ensure that all provided information is complete and accurate.

Committee and Board Review

December 2017

The TPB and the TPB Technical Committee will review the draft inputs at their December meetings. Other committees and sub-committees may request a briefing on the draft inputs.

Comment Period December 2017 -

January 2018

A 30-day comment period will provide an official opportunity for TPB members, stakehold-ers, and the public to comment on the draft inputs. Comments must be provided through official channels described at mwcog.org/TPBcomment.

Review of Comments and Board Approval

January 2018

The TPB and TPB Technical Committee will review comments on the draft inputs. The board will vote at its January meeting to approve the inputs for use in the federally required Air Quality Conformity and other analyses of the plan.

Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 185

Page 189: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element...Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1 INTRODUCTION The financially constrained element

BASIC SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS FOR CONFORMITY INPUTSAn online database application is used to gather project and program information from each agency. Staff from implementing agencies will be assigned an account with a user name and password. There are two levels of access to the database: editors and reviewers. Each agency should decide which person on their staff should assume these roles. Once logged into the application users will have access to the most recent version of the plan and TIP information that was approved by the TPB. TPB staff will offer training sessions to assist staff with the application as needed.

Appendix A provides details instructions for project and program submissions.

RESOURCES AND MAPSThe following resources and maps may be helpful for agencies and jurisdictions as they report on how their technical submissions support or advance regional goals and priorities.

TPB Vision www.mwcog.org/TPBvision

Regional Transportation Priorities Plan www.mwcog.org/RTPP

Activity Centers map and list www.mwcog.org/ActivityCenters

Equity Emphasis Areas map www.mwcog.org/EquityEmphasisAreas

Region Forward www.mwcog.org/RegionForward

Financial Analysis (2014 CLRP) www1.mwcog.org/clrp/elements/financial/default.asp

Federal requirements www1.mwcog.org/clrp/process/federalrequirements.asp

CONTACT INFORMATION

Technical questions and assistance with submissions: Andrew Austin | [email protected] | (202) 962-3353

Questions about transit assumptions and air quality conformity: Jane Posey | [email protected] | (202) 962-3331

All other questions about Visualize 2045: Lyn Erickson | [email protected] | (202) 962-3319

Submission Guide for Implementing AgenciesAppendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 186