Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Summer 2012: 2012 Community Wellbeing Survey interviews
Spring 2013: 2013 Community Index published
2014-Spring 2015: Sponsors & partners recruited,Survey Design
Spring-Summer 2015: 2015 CWS Interviews
Winter 2016: Partner projects released
Fall 2015: Survey data released
Spring 2016: Community Index reports published
2016-2017: Preparation for 2018 CWS
Motivation Behind 2015 Survey
• Valuable – 2012 Community Wellbeing Survey data highly useful to partners
• Longitudinal – Overlap with 2012 survey
• Comparable – Expanded geography of study covers entire state
• Sustainable – Hospitals’ CHNA requires assessment every 3 years
Survey Area & Findings17,000 interviews from May-Oct. 2015
All 169 towns in Connecticut
Data shown here from 2015 CWS are preliminary and for illustration only – please do not citeAnalysis based on “The Five Connecticuts,” CT State Data Center
Today’s Analysis: The Five Connecticuts
Data shown here from 2015 CWS are preliminary and for illustration only – please do not citeAnalysis based on “The Five Connecticuts,” CT State Data Center
About the Five Connecticuts methodology from the CT State Data Center: http://web2.uconn.edu/ctsdc/ctsdc_reports/five_connecticuts_preview/
Wealthy
Suburban
Rural
Urban Periphery
Urban Core
Access to Transportation
Wealthy Suburban Rural Urban Periphery
Urban Core0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%92% 92%
87% 87%
75%
In the past year, I have had reliable transportation when I have needed to go some place.
CT: 86% High-
Low: 17%
Data shown here from 2015 CWS are preliminary and for illustration only – please do not citeAnalysis based on “The Five Connecticuts,” CT State Data Center
Perception of Government
Wealthy Suburban Rural Urban Periphery
Urban Core0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
67%
54%47%
38% 28%
Government Responsiveness to Residents' Needsis "Excellent" or "Good"
CT: 43%
High-Low: 39%
Data shown here from 2015 CWS are preliminary and for illustration only – please do not citeAnalysis based on “The Five Connecticuts,” CT State Data Center
Environment for Children
Wealthy Suburban Rural Urban Periphery
Urban Core0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100% 95%89%
78%
65%
36%
As a place to raise children, my neighborhood is "Excellent" or "Good"
CT: 70% High-
Low: 59%
Data shown here from 2015 CWS are preliminary and for illustration only – please do not citeAnalysis based on “The Five Connecticuts,” CT State Data Center
Quality of Life
Wealthy Suburban Rural Urban Periphery
Urban Core0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%95%
90%82%
80%68%
I am satisfied with the area where I live.
CT: 82% High-
Low: 27%
Data shown here from 2015 CWS are preliminary and for illustration only – please do not citeAnalysis based on “The Five Connecticuts,” CT State Data Center
Wellbeing Differentials Wealthy – Urban Core
Data shown here from 2015 CWS are preliminary and for illustration only – please do not citeAnalysis based on “The Five Connecticuts,” CT State Data Center
Access to Transporta-tion
Perception of Government
Environment for Children
Quality of Life
17%
39%
59%
27%
Up next from DataHaven…
