18
PIs: Giorgos Mountrakis, Colin Beier, Bill Porter + , Benjamin Zuckerberg^, Lianjun Zhang, Bryan Blair* USING LIDAR TO ASSESS THE ROLES OF CLIMATE AND LAND-COVER DYNAMICS AS DRIVERS OF CHANGES IN BIODIVERSITY SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry + Michigan State University ^University of Wisconsin *NASA Goddard Space Flight Center PhDs: Huiran Jin, Wei Zhuang, John Wiley, Marta Jarzyna

SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry + Michigan State University

  • Upload
    kera

  • View
    33

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

USING LIDAR TO ASSESS THE ROLES OF CLIMATE AND LAND-COVER DYNAMICS AS DRIVERS OF CHANGES IN BIODIVERSITY. PIs: Giorgos Mountrakis , Colin Beier , Bill Porter + , Benjamin Zuckerberg ^, Lianjun Zhang, Bryan Blair*. PhDs: Huiran Jin, Wei Zhuang , John Wiley , Marta Jarzyna. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry + Michigan State University

PIs: Giorgos Mountrakis, Colin Beier, Bill Porter+, Benjamin Zuckerberg^, Lianjun Zhang, Bryan Blair*

USING LIDAR TO ASSESS THE ROLES OF CLIMATE AND LAND-COVER DYNAMICS AS DRIVERS OF CHANGES IN BIODIVERSITY

SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry+Michigan State University^University of Wisconsin

*NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

PhDs: Huiran Jin, Wei Zhuang, John Wiley, Marta Jarzyna

Page 2: SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry + Michigan State University

• Introduction

1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 20200.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0New York Land In Farms

Year

Mill

ion

Acre

s

Stanton and Bills 1996 and USDA Agricultural Census 2007

Page 3: SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry + Michigan State University

• Research Questions:1. Does the addition of waveform LiDAR data

improve the ability of multispectral image processing to classify habitat types?

2. Can a model of successional dynamics coupled with LiDAR-derived vegetation structure information help predict past and future habitat trends?

3. To what degree do climate changes and habitat trends affect breeding bird range shifts, and can we effective model future bird dynamics?

Page 4: SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry + Michigan State University

• Study Area: Central New York

Page 5: SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry + Michigan State University

Treetop Height VS. Gaussian Decomposition Treetop Height VS. RH100 values

Existing methodProposed method

• Results: LiDAR Improved treetop height estimation

Page 6: SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry + Michigan State University

Existing methodsAdjusted R2 = 0.5-0.65

Proposed method:Adjusted R2 = 0.7-0.8

If you have Biomass Data over LVIS signals please contact us:

Giorgos Mountrakis - [email protected]

• Results: LiDAR improved biomass estimation

Page 7: SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry + Michigan State University

Multi-temporal Landsat offers significant benefits in OVERALL classification accuracy

72.27 73.90

90.95

33.09 32.74 37.09

91.73

• Results: Integration of Landsat, PALSAR, and LVIS

Page 8: SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry + Michigan State University

• Results: Integration of Landsat, PALSAR, and LVIS

Page 9: SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry + Michigan State University

• Results: Succession modeling

Model dAICc df WeightLinear 0 4 1

Null 23.2 3 <0.001Logistic 41.4 5 <0.001

Four-parameter logistic 41.9 6 <0.001Michaelis-Menten 42.9 4 <0.001

Page 10: SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry + Michigan State University

• Results: Succession modeling

Model dAICc df WeightNull 0.0 3 1

Yield 15.3 4 <0.001Northing 28.0 4 <0.001

Yield + Northing 43.4 5 <0.001Yield * Northing 356.1 6 <0.001

Page 11: SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry + Michigan State University

Recent trends in NY and US Northeast mapped at 4km resolution (1980-2009)

Based on PRISM (Daly et al. 2002) and NRCC (DeGaetano & Belcher 2007)

Theil-Sen and linear estimations

Seasonal and spatial variability in recent temperature changes

Tmin warming at greater rate and more seasonally consistent

Tmax trends variable by month

Trend maps are heterogeneous, with patches of warming, stability and cooling

Results: Climate change mapping

Page 12: SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry + Michigan State University

Beier et al. 2011 Landscape Ecol.

Page 13: SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry + Michigan State University

Species Richness in 1980 – Preliminary Results

• Results: Breeding bird biodiversity

Page 14: SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry + Michigan State University

•12% increase in number of blocks w/ >76 species:

•34% in 1980

•46% in 2000

Species Richness in 2000 – Preliminary Results

• Results: Breeding bird biodiversity

Page 15: SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry + Michigan State University

λs

λs

λs

•Communities w/ increasing number of species: 43%

•Communities w/ decreasing number of species: 34%

•Communities w/ constant number of species: 23%

• Results: Breeding bird biodiversity

Community Dynamics 1980 – 2000 – Preliminary Results

Page 16: SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry + Michigan State University

•Communities stationary: >99%

•Communities not stationary: <1%

Community Dynamics 1980 – 2000 – Preliminary Results

• Results: Breeding bird biodiversity

Page 17: SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry + Michigan State University

• Summary• Land cover classifier -> shrubs• Climate trends (Beier et al. 2012)• LiDAR calibration -> automate• Successional model

• Drivers of breeding bird shifts

Page 18: SUNY College of Environmental Science & Forestry + Michigan State University

Questions?