Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
SUPER AWESOME STUFFLinear Forms Over Finite Abelian Groups
Ran JiMentor: Craig V. Spencer
Kansas State UniversityHome Institution: Wellesley College
July 27, 2011
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
3-Term Arithmetic Progressions in GroupsA More General Question
What is a 3-Term Arithmetic Progression?
3 numbers defined by x1 = a, x2 = a + 2d , and x3 = a + dwhere a, d ∈ Z
Formalized as a solution to x1 − x2 − 2x3 = ~r · ~x = 0 where~r = (1, 1,−2)
Ex. 1: 3, 7, 11 ∈ ZEx. 2: 5, 0, 2 ∈ Z7
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
3-Term Arithmetic Progressions in GroupsA More General Question
What is a 3-Term Arithmetic Progression?
3 numbers defined by x1 = a, x2 = a + 2d , and x3 = a + dwhere a, d ∈ ZFormalized as a solution to x1 − x2 − 2x3 = ~r · ~x = 0 where~r = (1, 1,−2)
Ex. 1: 3, 7, 11 ∈ ZEx. 2: 5, 0, 2 ∈ Z7
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
3-Term Arithmetic Progressions in GroupsA More General Question
What is a 3-Term Arithmetic Progression?
3 numbers defined by x1 = a, x2 = a + 2d , and x3 = a + dwhere a, d ∈ ZFormalized as a solution to x1 − x2 − 2x3 = ~r · ~x = 0 where~r = (1, 1,−2)
Ex. 1: 3, 7, 11 ∈ Z
Ex. 2: 5, 0, 2 ∈ Z7
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
3-Term Arithmetic Progressions in GroupsA More General Question
What is a 3-Term Arithmetic Progression?
3 numbers defined by x1 = a, x2 = a + 2d , and x3 = a + dwhere a, d ∈ ZFormalized as a solution to x1 − x2 − 2x3 = ~r · ~x = 0 where~r = (1, 1,−2)
Ex. 1: 3, 7, 11 ∈ ZEx. 2: 5, 0, 2 ∈ Z7
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
3-Term Arithmetic Progressions in GroupsA More General Question
The Problem
Define ~x as a trivial solution to ~r · ~x = 0 if d = 0, i.e.x1 = x2 = x3
For a finite abelian group G , want to find the maximum sizeof A ⊆ G such that A contains no non-trivial solutions to~r · ~x = 0
Theorem (Meshulam, 1993)
Let G be a finite abelian group with 2 - G and let D(G ) denote themaximal cardinality of a set A ⊆ G such that A contains nonon-trivial 3-term arithmetic progressions. Then for someM, β > 0,
D(G ) ≤ M|G |
(ln |G |)β.
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
3-Term Arithmetic Progressions in GroupsA More General Question
The Problem
Define ~x as a trivial solution to ~r · ~x = 0 if d = 0, i.e.x1 = x2 = x3
For a finite abelian group G , want to find the maximum sizeof A ⊆ G such that A contains no non-trivial solutions to~r · ~x = 0
Theorem (Meshulam, 1993)
Let G be a finite abelian group with 2 - G and let D(G ) denote themaximal cardinality of a set A ⊆ G such that A contains nonon-trivial 3-term arithmetic progressions. Then for someM, β > 0,
D(G ) ≤ M|G |
(ln |G |)β.
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
3-Term Arithmetic Progressions in GroupsA More General Question
The Problem
Define ~x as a trivial solution to ~r · ~x = 0 if d = 0, i.e.x1 = x2 = x3
For a finite abelian group G , want to find the maximum sizeof A ⊆ G such that A contains no non-trivial solutions to~r · ~x = 0
Theorem (Meshulam, 1993)
Let G be a finite abelian group with 2 - G and let D(G ) denote themaximal cardinality of a set A ⊆ G such that A contains nonon-trivial 3-term arithmetic progressions. Then for someM, β > 0,
D(G ) ≤ M|G |
(ln |G |)β.
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
3-Term Arithmetic Progressions in GroupsA More General Question
Now we want to generalize the question to finding solutions to~r · ~x = 0 for the general linear form ~r = (r1, · · · , rs).
Theorem (Liu and Spencer, 2009)
Let r1, . . . , rs be non-zero integers satisfying r1 + . . .+ rs = 0. Let
G ' Zk1 ⊕ · · · ⊕ Zkn , n is called the rank of G
be a finite abelian group with ki |ki−1 (2 ≤ i ≤ n), and supposethat (ri , k1) = 1 (1 ≤ i ≤ s). Let D(G ) denote the maximalcardinality of a set A ⊂ G containing no non-trivial solution ofr1x1 + · · ·+ rsxs = 0 with xi ∈ A (1 ≤ i ≤ s). Then for somecomputable constant M,
D(G ) ≤ M|G |
ns−2 .
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
3-Term Arithmetic Progressions in GroupsA More General Question
Now we want to generalize the question to finding solutions to~r · ~x = 0 for the general linear form ~r = (r1, · · · , rs).
Theorem (Liu and Spencer, 2009)
Let r1, . . . , rs be non-zero integers satisfying r1 + . . .+ rs = 0. Let
G ' Zk1 ⊕ · · · ⊕ Zkn , n is called the rank of G
be a finite abelian group with ki |ki−1 (2 ≤ i ≤ n), and supposethat (ri , k1) = 1 (1 ≤ i ≤ s). Let D(G ) denote the maximalcardinality of a set A ⊂ G containing no non-trivial solution ofr1x1 + · · ·+ rsxs = 0 with xi ∈ A (1 ≤ i ≤ s). Then for somecomputable constant M,
D(G ) ≤ M|G |
ns−2 .
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
3-Term Arithmetic Progressions in GroupsA More General Question
For this summer project, we used the less general linear form~r = (1, . . . , 1,−s) ∈ Zs+1. Note: ~r = (1, . . . , 1,−s) mimics theconstruction of (1, 1,−2).
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
3-Term Arithmetic Progressions in GroupsA More General Question
Main Theorem
Theorem
Let ~r = (1, . . . , 1,−s), G be a finite abelian group, and D(G ) bethe maximal cardinality of a set A ⊆ G containing no non-trivialsolution to x1 + · · ·+ xs − sxs+1 = 0 with xi ∈ A (1 ≤ i ≤ s + 1).Define
d(m) = supc(H)≥m
D(H)
|H|
where c(H) is the rank of H. For any n ∈ N, d(n) ≤ Cns−2 , where
C = max
{1,√
s2 + s
√√√√(2s−4log 2
)2s−42
(2s−4log 2
) ,2s−1
2(s−2)2(2s−2 − 1)s−2
}.
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
First LemmaSecond Lemma
Lemma (Lemma 1)
For 1 ≤ i ≤ s + 1, let fi (χ) =∑x∈A
χ(rix) =∑x∈A
χri (x).
For ~r = (11, . . . , 1s ,−s),
(F) =∑χ∈G
f1(χ)f2(χ) · · · fs+1(χ) ≤ |G | |A|s−1(
s + 1
2
).
Let G be a finite abelian group with rank ≥ n. Suppose thatA ⊆ G contains no non-trivial solution to x1 + · · ·+ xs − sxs+1 = 0with xi ∈ A (1 ≤ i ≤ s + 1). G is the set of all homomorphismsfrom G to C×. Let χ ∈ G .
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
First LemmaSecond Lemma
Lemma (Lemma 1)
For 1 ≤ i ≤ s + 1, let fi (χ) =∑x∈A
χ(rix) =∑x∈A
χri (x).
For ~r = (11, . . . , 1s ,−s),
(F) =∑χ∈G
f1(χ)f2(χ) · · · fs+1(χ) ≤ |G | |A|s−1(
s + 1
2
).
Let G be a finite abelian group with rank ≥ n. Suppose thatA ⊆ G contains no non-trivial solution to x1 + · · ·+ xs − sxs+1 = 0with xi ∈ A (1 ≤ i ≤ s + 1).
G is the set of all homomorphismsfrom G to C×. Let χ ∈ G .
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
First LemmaSecond Lemma
Lemma (Lemma 1)
For 1 ≤ i ≤ s + 1, let fi (χ) =∑x∈A
χ(rix) =∑x∈A
χri (x).
For ~r = (11, . . . , 1s ,−s),
(F) =∑χ∈G
f1(χ)f2(χ) · · · fs+1(χ) ≤ |G | |A|s−1(
s + 1
2
).
Let G be a finite abelian group with rank ≥ n. Suppose thatA ⊆ G contains no non-trivial solution to x1 + · · ·+ xs − sxs+1 = 0with xi ∈ A (1 ≤ i ≤ s + 1). G is the set of all homomorphismsfrom G to C×. Let χ ∈ G .
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
First LemmaSecond Lemma
Then
(F) =∑χ∈G
f1(χ)f2(χ) · · · fs+1(χ)
=∑χ∈G
(∑x1∈A
χ(x1)
)· · ·
(∑xs∈A
χ(xl)
)( ∑xs+1∈A
χ(−sxs+1)
)
=∑x1∈A· · ·
∑xs+1∈A
∑χ∈G
χ(x1 + x2 + · · ·+ xs − sxs+1)
Fact 1:∑χ∈G
χ(x) =
{|G | if x = 0
0 if x 6= 0
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
First LemmaSecond Lemma
Then
(F) =∑χ∈G
f1(χ)f2(χ) · · · fs+1(χ)
=∑χ∈G
(∑x1∈A
χ(x1)
)· · ·
(∑xs∈A
χ(xl)
)( ∑xs+1∈A
χ(−sxs+1)
)
=∑x1∈A· · ·
∑xs+1∈A
∑χ∈G
χ(x1 + x2 + · · ·+ xs − sxs+1)
Fact 1:∑χ∈G
χ(x) =
{|G | if x = 0
0 if x 6= 0
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
First LemmaSecond Lemma
According to Fact 1,∑χ∈G
χ(x1 + · · ·+ xs − sxs+1) = 1 only when
x1 + · · ·+ xs − sxs+1 = 0. So the above equation becomes
|G | · {~x ∈ As+1 : ~r · ~x = 0}.
Since A contains no non-trivial solutions, we are left with
|G | ·∑
1≤i<j≤s+1
# {~x ∈ As+1 : xi = xj ,~r · ~x = 0}.
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
First LemmaSecond Lemma
According to Fact 1,∑χ∈G
χ(x1 + · · ·+ xs − sxs+1) = 1 only when
x1 + · · ·+ xs − sxs+1 = 0. So the above equation becomes
|G | · {~x ∈ As+1 : ~r · ~x = 0}.
Since A contains no non-trivial solutions, we are left with
|G | ·∑
1≤i<j≤s+1
# {~x ∈ As+1 : xi = xj ,~r · ~x = 0}.
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
First LemmaSecond Lemma
We want to find upper bound on∑1≤i<j≤s+1
# {~x ∈ As+1 : xi = xj ,~r · ~x = 0}.
For some fixed i , 1 ≤ i ≤ s + 1, we want to look at all solutions ~xto ~r · ~x = 0 such that xi = xj for some i 6= j . l+1∑
w=1w 6=i , j
rwxw
+ (ri + rj)xi = 0
Rewrite as q1x1 + · · ·+ qsxs = 0.
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
First LemmaSecond Lemma
We want to find upper bound on∑1≤i<j≤s+1
# {~x ∈ As+1 : xi = xj ,~r · ~x = 0}.
For some fixed i , 1 ≤ i ≤ s + 1, we want to look at all solutions ~xto ~r · ~x = 0 such that xi = xj for some i 6= j . l+1∑
w=1w 6=i , j
rwxw
+ (ri + rj)xi = 0
Rewrite as q1x1 + · · ·+ qsxs = 0.
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
First LemmaSecond Lemma
We want to find upper bound on∑1≤i<j≤s+1
# {~x ∈ As+1 : xi = xj ,~r · ~x = 0}.
For some fixed i , 1 ≤ i ≤ s + 1, we want to look at all solutions ~xto ~r · ~x = 0 such that xi = xj for some i 6= j . l+1∑
w=1w 6=i , j
rwxw
+ (ri + rj)xi = 0
Rewrite as q1x1 + · · ·+ qsxs = 0.
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
First LemmaSecond Lemma
WLOG, let q1 = · · · = qs−2 = 1. Then,
x1 =−q2x2 − q3x3 − · · · − qsxs
q1
= −q2x2 − q3x3 − · · · − qsxs
So we have that
∑1≤i<j≤s+1
#{~x ∈ As+1 : xi = xj , ~r · ~x = 0} ≤∑
1≤i<j≤s+1
|A|s−1.
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
First LemmaSecond Lemma
WLOG, let q1 = · · · = qs−2 = 1. Then,
x1 =−q2x2 − q3x3 − · · · − qsxs
q1
= −q2x2 − q3x3 − · · · − qsxs
So we have that
∑1≤i<j≤s+1
#{~x ∈ As+1 : xi = xj , ~r · ~x = 0} ≤∑
1≤i<j≤s+1
|A|s−1.
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
First LemmaSecond Lemma
Plugging this upper bound back into our original equation gives us
(F) =∑χ∈G
f1(χ)f2(χ) · · · fs+1(χ)
= |G |∑
1≤i<j≤s+1
#{~x ∈ As+1 : xi = xj ,~r · ~x = 0}
≤ |G |∑
1≤i<j≤s+1
|A|s−1
= |G | |A|s−1(
s + 1
2
).
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
First LemmaSecond Lemma
Let W be the kernel of χ1, where
∣∣∣∣∑x∈A
χ1(x)
∣∣∣∣ = maxχ 6=χ0
∣∣∣∣∑x∈A
χ(x)
∣∣∣∣.
Lemma (Lemma 2)
For 1 ≤ i ≤ s + 1, let fi (χ) =∑x∈A
χ(rix) =∑x∈A
χri (x).
For ~r = (11, . . . , 1s ,−s),
(F) =∑χ∈G
f1(χ)f2(χ) · · · fs+1(χ)
≥ |A|s+1 − |A|2 |G |
(D(W )
|W ||G | − |A|
)s−2
.
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
First LemmaSecond Lemma
Let W be the kernel of χ1, where
∣∣∣∣∑x∈A
χ1(x)
∣∣∣∣ = maxχ 6=χ0
∣∣∣∣∑x∈A
χ(x)
∣∣∣∣.Lemma (Lemma 2)
For 1 ≤ i ≤ s + 1, let fi (χ) =∑x∈A
χ(rix) =∑x∈A
χri (x).
For ~r = (11, . . . , 1s ,−s),
(F) =∑χ∈G
f1(χ)f2(χ) · · · fs+1(χ)
≥ |A|s+1 − |A|2 |G |
(D(W )
|W ||G | − |A|
)s−2
.
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
First LemmaSecond Lemma
(F) =∑χ∈G
f1(χ)f2(χ) · · · fs+1(χ)
=∑χ∈G
(∑x1∈A
χ(x1)
)· · ·
(∑xs∈A
χ(xs)
)( ∑xs+1∈A
χ(−sxs+1)
)
Let ♥ =
(∑x1∈A
χ(x1)
)· · ·
(∑xs∈A
χ(xs)
)( ∑xs+1∈A
χ(−sxs+1)
).
We can split the sum over χ ∈ G into two parts, χ = χ0 andχ 6= χ0.
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
First LemmaSecond Lemma
(F) =∑χ∈G
f1(χ)f2(χ) · · · fs+1(χ)
=∑χ∈G
(∑x1∈A
χ(x1)
)· · ·
(∑xs∈A
χ(xs)
)( ∑xs+1∈A
χ(−sxs+1)
)
Let ♥ =
(∑x1∈A
χ(x1)
)· · ·
(∑xs∈A
χ(xs)
)( ∑xs+1∈A
χ(−sxs+1)
).
We can split the sum over χ ∈ G into two parts, χ = χ0 andχ 6= χ0.
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
First LemmaSecond Lemma
(F) =∑χ∈G
f1(χ)f2(χ) · · · fs+1(χ)
=∑χ∈G
(∑x1∈A
χ(x1)
)· · ·
(∑xs∈A
χ(xs)
)( ∑xs+1∈A
χ(−sxs+1)
)
Let ♥ =
(∑x1∈A
χ(x1)
)· · ·
(∑xs∈A
χ(xs)
)( ∑xs+1∈A
χ(−sxs+1)
).
We can split the sum over χ ∈ G into two parts, χ = χ0 andχ 6= χ0.
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
First LemmaSecond Lemma
For all x ∈ G , χ0(x) = 1. Then∑x∈A
χ0(x) = |A|.
Using this fact,
we conclude that
(F) =∑χ∈G
♥
=∑χ=χ0
♥+∑χ6=χ0
♥
= |A|s+1 +∑χ 6=χ0
♥
We want to find an upper bound on
∣∣∣∣ ∑χ 6=χ0
♥∣∣∣∣ and subtract it from
|A|s+1 in order to find a lower bound on (F).
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
First LemmaSecond Lemma
For all x ∈ G , χ0(x) = 1. Then∑x∈A
χ0(x) = |A|. Using this fact,
we conclude that
(F) =∑χ∈G
♥
=∑χ=χ0
♥+∑χ 6=χ0
♥
= |A|s+1 +∑χ 6=χ0
♥
We want to find an upper bound on
∣∣∣∣ ∑χ 6=χ0
♥∣∣∣∣ and subtract it from
|A|s+1 in order to find a lower bound on (F).
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
First LemmaSecond Lemma
For all x ∈ G , χ0(x) = 1. Then∑x∈A
χ0(x) = |A|. Using this fact,
we conclude that
(F) =∑χ∈G
♥
=∑χ=χ0
♥+∑χ 6=χ0
♥
= |A|s+1 +∑χ 6=χ0
♥
We want to find an upper bound on
∣∣∣∣ ∑χ 6=χ0
♥∣∣∣∣ and subtract it from
|A|s+1 in order to find a lower bound on (F).
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
First LemmaSecond Lemma
∣∣∣∣ ∑χ 6=χ0
♥∣∣∣∣
≤∑χ 6=χ0
∣∣∣∣ ∑x1∈A
χ(x1)
∣∣∣∣ . . . ∣∣∣∣ ∑xs∈A
χ(xs)
∣∣∣∣∣∣∣∣ ∑xs+1∈A
χ(−sxs+1)
∣∣∣∣=∑χ 6=χ0
∣∣∣∣∑x∈A
χ(x)
∣∣∣∣s ∣∣∣∣∑y∈A
χ(−sy)
∣∣∣∣≤[
maxχ 6=χ0
∣∣∑x∈A
χ(x)∣∣]s−2 ∑
χ 6=χ0
∣∣∣∣∑x∈A
χ(x)
∣∣∣∣2∣∣∣∣∑y∈A
χ(−sy)
∣∣∣∣≤[
maxχ 6=χ0
∣∣∑x∈A
χ(x)∣∣
︸ ︷︷ ︸A
]s−2 ∑χ 6=χ0
∣∣∣∣∑x∈A
χ(x)
∣∣∣∣2︸ ︷︷ ︸B
|A|
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
First LemmaSecond Lemma
After some work, we obtain the results that
A ≤ D(W )
|W ||G | − |A|
B = |A| |G | .
This gives us
∣∣∣∣ ∑χ 6=χ0
♥∣∣∣∣
≤As−2B |A|
≤ |A|2 |G |
(D(W )
|W ||G | − |A|
)s−2
.
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
First LemmaSecond Lemma
After some work, we obtain the results that
A ≤ D(W )
|W ||G | − |A|
B = |A| |G | .
This gives us
∣∣∣∣ ∑χ 6=χ0
♥∣∣∣∣
≤As−2B |A|
≤ |A|2 |G |
(D(W )
|W ||G | − |A|
)s−2
.
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
First LemmaSecond Lemma
Then
(F)
≥ |A|s+1 −∣∣∣∣ ∑χ 6=χ0
♥∣∣∣∣
≥ |A|s+1 − |A|2 |G |
(D(W )
|W ||G | − |A|
)s−2
.
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
The Induction Proof
Proof of Theorem
If we put together Lemma 1 and Lemma 2, we obtain the followinginequality:
|A|s+1 − |A|2 |G |
(D(W )
|W ||G | − |A|
)s−2
≤(
s + 1
2
)|A|s−1 |G | .
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
The Induction Proof
The Induction
We will show that d(n) = maxc(H)≥n
D(H)
|H|≤ C
ns−2 , where
C = max
{1,√
s2 + s
√√√√(2s−4log 2
)2s−42
(2s−4log 2
) ,2s−1
2(s−2)2(2s−2 − 1)s−2
},
using a proof by induction on n.
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
The Induction Proof
For n = 1, the expression simplifies to d(n) ≤ Cns−2 = C. Since
D(G ) can be at most |G |, d(n) ≤ 1. Then as long as C ≥ 1, ourtheorem holds.
For n > 1, we will assume that d(n − 1) ≤ C(n−1)s−2 and prove that
d(n) ≤ Cns−2 .
In order to solve for C, we can split this into 2 cases:
Case 1: |A|s+1
2 ≤(
s + 1
2
)|G | |A|s−1
Case 2: |A|s+1
2 >
(s + 1
2
)|G | |A|s−1
For each case, we will show that |A||G | ≤C
ns−2 for all A, implying that
d(n) ≤ C1ns−2 .
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
The Induction Proof
For n = 1, the expression simplifies to d(n) ≤ Cns−2 = C. Since
D(G ) can be at most |G |, d(n) ≤ 1. Then as long as C ≥ 1, ourtheorem holds.
For n > 1, we will assume that d(n − 1) ≤ C(n−1)s−2 and prove that
d(n) ≤ Cns−2 .
In order to solve for C, we can split this into 2 cases:
Case 1: |A|s+1
2 ≤(
s + 1
2
)|G | |A|s−1
Case 2: |A|s+1
2 >
(s + 1
2
)|G | |A|s−1
For each case, we will show that |A||G | ≤C
ns−2 for all A, implying that
d(n) ≤ C1ns−2 .
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
The Induction Proof
For n = 1, the expression simplifies to d(n) ≤ Cns−2 = C. Since
D(G ) can be at most |G |, d(n) ≤ 1. Then as long as C ≥ 1, ourtheorem holds.
For n > 1, we will assume that d(n − 1) ≤ C(n−1)s−2 and prove that
d(n) ≤ Cns−2 .
In order to solve for C, we can split this into 2 cases:
Case 1: |A|s+1
2 ≤(
s + 1
2
)|G | |A|s−1
Case 2: |A|s+1
2 >
(s + 1
2
)|G | |A|s−1
For each case, we will show that |A||G | ≤C
ns−2 for all A, implying that
d(n) ≤ C1ns−2 .
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
The Induction Proof
For n = 1, the expression simplifies to d(n) ≤ Cns−2 = C. Since
D(G ) can be at most |G |, d(n) ≤ 1. Then as long as C ≥ 1, ourtheorem holds.
For n > 1, we will assume that d(n − 1) ≤ C(n−1)s−2 and prove that
d(n) ≤ Cns−2 .
In order to solve for C, we can split this into 2 cases:
Case 1: |A|s+1
2 ≤(
s + 1
2
)|G | |A|s−1
Case 2: |A|s+1
2 >
(s + 1
2
)|G | |A|s−1
For each case, we will show that |A||G | ≤C
ns−2 for all A, implying that
d(n) ≤ C1ns−2 .
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
The Induction Proof
Case 1
Assume |A|s+1
2 ≤(
s + 1
2
)|G | |A|s−1. We must find
C ≥√
s2 + s√
n2s−4
2n .
√n2s−4
2n has a single maximum at n = 2s−4log 2 . Let
C ≥√
s2 + s
√√√√(2s−4log 2
)2s−42
(2s−4log 2
) .
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
The Induction Proof
Case 1
Assume |A|s+1
2 ≤(
s + 1
2
)|G | |A|s−1. We must find
C ≥√
s2 + s√
n2s−4
2n .√n2s−4
2n has a single maximum at n = 2s−4log 2 . Let
C ≥√
s2 + s
√√√√(2s−4log 2
)2s−42
(2s−4log 2
) .
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
The Induction Proof
Case 2
Assume |A|s+1
2 >
(s + 1
2
)|G | |A|s−1. We must find
C ≥ 1
2b2(nb+1)
(nb
(n−1)b − 1
)b
where b = s − 2.
1
2b2(nb+1)
(nb
(n−1)b − 1
)b
is a strictly decreasing function of n.
Take n = 2 and let
C ≥ 2b+1
2b2(2b − 1)b =
2s−1
2(s−2)2(2s−2 − 1)s−2.
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
The Induction Proof
Case 2
Assume |A|s+1
2 >
(s + 1
2
)|G | |A|s−1. We must find
C ≥ 1
2b2(nb+1)
(nb
(n−1)b − 1
)b
where b = s − 2.
1
2b2(nb+1)
(nb
(n−1)b − 1
)b
is a strictly decreasing function of n.
Take n = 2 and let
C ≥ 2b+1
2b2(2b − 1)b =
2s−1
2(s−2)2(2s−2 − 1)s−2.
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
The Induction Proof
Let C = max
{1,√
s2 + s
√(2s−4log 2
)2s−4
2
(2s−4log 2
) , 2s−1
2(s−2)2(2s−2 − 1)s−2
}for
each s, and we have obtained the upper bound d(n) ≤ Cns−2 .
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff
IntroductionLemmas
Proof of TheoremThe End
Thank you for your time and attention!
Ran Ji Mentor: Craig V. Spencer Super Awesome Stuff