Upload
storm
View
38
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Superintendent Goals Update. Governing Board Presentation October 28, 2008. Selection of Priority Areas. Strategic Plan 5 District goals Collaboration with Governing Board Superintendent goals established (Winter 2007). List of Goals. Improve academic achievement (#1) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Superintendent Goals Update
Governing Board PresentationOctober 28, 2008
Selection of Priority Areas
Strategic Plan 5 District goals Collaboration with Governing
Board Superintendent goals established
(Winter 2007)
List of Goals
Improve academic achievement (#1) Develop new employee compensation system
(#4) Improve teacher evaluation system (#4) Reduce teacher absenteeism (#4) Address AYP issues (#1) Report and update on facilities plans,
particularly construction projects (#3) Eliminate audit findings for student attendance
(#2)
Academic Achievement
State Assessment System
Kyrene School District
Closing the Gaps in Grade 8 AIMS Reading
0
20
40
60
80
100
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Annual Progress Required to Meet 100% Proficient for NCLB
10
0%
by
20
14
NecessaryProgress
NoProgress
StateExpectedProgressStateActual
2005, 2006, 2007 & 2008 Data From AIMS Summary Reports 2
Kyrene Performance
State Performance
State Expected
Kyrene School District
Closing the Gaps in Grade 8 AIMS Math
0
20
40
60
80
100
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Annual Progress Required to Meet 100% Proficient for NCLB
10
0%
by
20
14
NecessaryProgress
NoProgress
StateExpectedProgressStateActual
2005, 2006, 2007 & 2008 Data From AIMS Summary Reports 2
Kyrene Performance
State Performance
State Expected Progress
State Assessment System
Very high performance Favorable comparisons for Kyrene
to other Arizona districts Lack of positive trends Evident achievement gap
Kyrene Assessment System
Percentage and Range of Students at the "Proficiency" Levelfor MSS-EOG 1998 - 2008 for Grades 1 - 5
(Actual percentage, not weighted)
68
73
85
7881
78
95 95
8183 83
71
75
71
80
74
88
8380
78
82
76
6871
76 7679
70
94
86
66
75 76
84
7780
8886
88
84 84
61
66
78
74 74
8179
81 80
85
72
33 33
27
32
38
3028
4643
40
32
28
33
3740
34
29
38 39 39 39 38 39
29 2831
42
31
39
30
26
39
30
44 4442
48
43
39 39
35
25
31
23 22
30 30
39 39
30
37
30
53 53
57 57
6158 57
52
5658
56 57
6164 63
5153
63
5659
62
54
6466
6871
66 65
45 46 47 46
52 51
65
61 60 59
55
70
7473
33
2427
6461
50
59
5150
57
6263
6764
54
58
63
5756
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
199
8
199
9
200
0
200
1
200
2
200
3
200
4
200
5
200
6
200
7
200
8
199
8
199
9
200
0
200
1
200
2
200
3
200
4
200
5
200
6
200
7
200
8
199
8
199
9
200
0
200
1
200
2
200
3
200
4
200
5
200
6
200
7
200
8
199
8
199
9
200
0
200
1
200
2
200
3
200
4
200
5
200
6
200
7
200
8
199
8
199
9
200
0
200
1
200
2
200
3
200
4
200
5
200
6
200
7
200
8
High Low District
Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5
Middle Schools Percentage Range of Students at the "Proficiency" Level for MSS-EOG 1999 - 2008 for Grades 6 - 8
(Actual percentage, not weighted)
52 52
58 57
62
7472
70 69
6258
50 50
62
54
59
64
73 72
77
5557 57
55
60 59
6871
69
74
3531
38 37
49 49
43 4244
4044
40 4144
42
46
5755
53
48
33
4145
36
46
41
5356
46
52
43 42
48 48
55
65
57
49
45 45
5249
6163 63 62
42
4951
48
53 52
60
65
58
64
5357 57
55
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
High Low District
Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8
Percentage and Range of Students at the "Proficiency" Levelfor CASS-EOG 2000 - 2008 for Grades 2 - 8
(Actual percentage, not weighted)
68
85
70
81
77 78
84
77
84
74
70 69
74
69
65
71
7572
6365 66 67 68
7169
7376
61
68 6764
6159 60
56
6563
7779
74 75
70
79
69
61
57
62
7068 69
71
7674
6765 64
68
7275
69 69 69
34
39 3937
40
47
37 37
3336 37
29
3537
32 31 30
23
2931
33
29
42
30 3133
2729
32
37
31
24
31
23
50
45
59 59
5457
51 52
46
12
49 50
54
46
5350
52
4749 50 51 51 51
53
4648 48
5457
5457
6163
5654 53
49
59
49 5053 52
5654
46
53
4845 46
43
55
66 6664
58
63
56
42
5456
60 6062
60 61
5754 55 54
5759
62
57 56 56
62
38
28
48
6264
51
47
545251
47
5455
43
62
55
62
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
High Low District
Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8
Kyrene Assessment Results Erratic progress over time Lack of positive trends Great variability between schools Evident achievement gap
Achievement Gap
Minority students Special Education students ELL students Low SES students
Strategies District achievement goals Instructional Leadership
Walkthroughs Evaluation training and consistent implementation Leadership training Implementation data gathering
Superintendent presentations at every school and department
School Improvement Plans Response to Intervention (RTI) “Beyond Diversity” – “Closing the Achievement
Gap” efforts underway
Develop new employee compensation system
Compensation System (Certified)
Step and movement system for teachers eliminated
Total Compensation chart developed and implemented
Educational credits component transition plan developed
Improve teacher evaluation system
Evaluation System
Differentiated plan developed (T-3) Comprehensive – Standard
evaluations Timeline developed for revised
evaluation system (T+3) Professional Growth Plan (PGP)
being leveraged to have greater impact on student achievement
Reduce teacher absenteeism (#4)
Teacher Absenteeism Absenteeism has been reduced from
4.25% in 05/06 to 4.09% in 06/07 to 3.77% last year
18 schools had a lower certified absenteeism rate than the year before
21 schools had a lower certified absenteeism rate than 2 years before
Long-term solutions team collaboration
Address AYP issues (#1)
Annual Yearly Progress (AYP)
AYP issues related to % tested eliminated
Current AYP problem is about meeting annual learning goals for sub-groups
Major efforts underway to address current AYP problems
Report and update on facilities plans, particularly construction projects
Facilities
Numerous progress meetings, reports, and presentations for Portable Replacement Project (Board, Schools, Community)
Information posted on Kyrene web site
Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) approved by Board on 10/14/08
Eliminate audit findings for student attendance
Audit
FY 07/08 (anticipated) audit results show no findings in the previously identified areas
Comments – Questions