Upload
others
View
11
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Supermassive Dark Stars:stellar evolution
Tanja Rindler-Daller & Katherine Freese
Dep.of Physics & Michigan Center for Theoretical Physics
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
in collaboration with Mike Montgomery & Don Winget
Dep.of Astronomy & McDonald Observatory, UT Austin
27th Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics, Dallas, TX 2013
Prerequisite: self-annihilating dark matter
• Self-annihilating dark matter (DM):
(DM particle is its own anti-particle)
-) WIMPs (lightest SUSY partners to W,Z,Higgs; Kaluza-Klein particles, sterile neutrinos)
→ self-annihilation gives correct relic density of DM
→ possibly already indirect detection signatures
(FERMI-LAT, AMS) • Self-annihilation produces heat
→ affecting stellar evolution
.) present-day stars: constrained by observations
.) first stars: yet unconstrained
First Stars
• First stars form in the high-DM density peaks of primordial (mini-)halos with 105-6 Msun at high redshift
z ~ 25-15
• Those halos arose from the merging of smaller structures as overdense regions in the Universe assemble hierarchically into ever larger halos
• Pristine atomic gas of hydrogen and helium
• Baryonic matter cools and collapses via molecular hydrogen cooling into a single small protostar at the center of the halo
The Dark Star Proposal: Spolyar, Freese & Gondolo (2008)
The effect of DM heating is more pronounced at the time when first stars form:
• DM density scales as (1+z)3
• Protostar forms in the center of minihalo
• Upon collapse, baryons pull in more DM via adiabatic contraction
• For high-enough WIMP-nucleon scattering cross section, more DM gets captured in the central regions
The Dark Star Proposal: Spolyar, Freese & Gondolo (2008)
Critical temperature Tc(n) below which DM heating dominates over
all cooling mechanism (H2 cooling, H line cooling, Compton cooling)
at a given gas core density n
Supermassive Dark Stars: stellar evolution using polytropes
(Freese, Ilie, Spolyar,Valluri,Bodenheimer, 2010)
Assume that DS can be described using polytropic law
P = Kρ1+1/n in hydrostatic equilibrium:
grow DS and calculate new equilibria iteratively during its
evolution
→ established that DS can grow to supermassive size
with luminosities L ~ 109 – 1011 Lsun
→ great prospects of observing them with JWST
(→ see Cosmin Ilie's talk this session)
Dark Star evolution: improved models
Use 1D fully-fledged stellar evolution code
MESA
(Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics)
http://mesa.sourceforge.net/
→ improve upon polytropic models
→ study pulsations of dark stars
→ other features in stellar evolution ('flashes')
DS forms in minihalo of 106 Msun
• z = 20
• primordial He/H gas: 0.76
• baryon-to-DM ratio: 0.15
• c = 3.5
• dM/dt = 10-3 Msun /yr
for mDM = 10, 100, 1000 GeV
DS forms in minihalo of 106 Msun
• mDM = 100 GeV
• z = 20
• primordial He/H gas: 0.76
• baryon-to-DM ratio: 0.15
• c = 3.5
• dM/dt = 10-3 Msun /yr
DS forms in minihalo of 106 Msun
MESA dark stars with 105 Msun are
• brighter ~ 2x
• hotter ~ 1.5x (for Teff and Tc)
• smaller ~ 1.6x
• denser ~ 3.5x
than polytropic DS models
DS forms in minihalo of 108 Msun
• mDM = 100 GeV
• z = 15
• primordial He/H gas: 0.76
• baryon-to-DM ratio: 0.15
• c = 3.5
• MESA: dM/dt = 10-2 Msun /yr
• Polytropes: dM/dt = 10-1 Msun /yr
DS forms in minihalo of 108 Msun
MESA dark stars with 107 Msun are
• brighter ~ 2.7x
• hotter ~ 1.8x (for Teff and Tc)
• smaller ~ 1.9x
• denser ~ 7x
than polytropic DS models