5
Supplement of Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11837–11851, 2016 http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/16/11837/2016/ doi:10.5194/acp-16-11837-2016-supplement © Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Supplement of Response of winter fine particulate matter concentrations to emission and meteorology changes in North China Meng Gao et al. Correspondence to: Meng Gao ([email protected]) and Gregory R. Carmichael ([email protected]) The copyright of individual parts of the supplement might differ from the CC-BY 3.0 licence.

Supplement of · Figure S1. Model domain settings Figure S2. The impacts of boundary conditions on monthly averaged PM 2.5 concentrations in the innermost domain Figure S3. Averaged

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Supplement of · Figure S1. Model domain settings Figure S2. The impacts of boundary conditions on monthly averaged PM 2.5 concentrations in the innermost domain Figure S3. Averaged

Supplement of Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11837–11851, 2016http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/16/11837/2016/doi:10.5194/acp-16-11837-2016-supplement© Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License.

Supplement of

Response of winter fine particulate matter concentrations to emission andmeteorology changes in North ChinaMeng Gao et al.

Correspondence to: Meng Gao ([email protected]) and Gregory R. Carmichael ([email protected])

The copyright of individual parts of the supplement might differ from the CC-BY 3.0 licence.

Page 2: Supplement of · Figure S1. Model domain settings Figure S2. The impacts of boundary conditions on monthly averaged PM 2.5 concentrations in the innermost domain Figure S3. Averaged

Figure S1. Model domain settings

Figure S2. The impacts of boundary conditions on monthly averaged PM2.5 concentrations in the

innermost domain

Figure S3. Averaged VOC:NOx ratios in 1960(a) and 2010(b)

Figure S4. Changes in LWP due to temperature perturbations

Figure S5. Monthly mean temperature difference due to perturbation in initial and boundary

conditions (a), and daily mean OH (b), mean PBLH (c) and mean near surface wind speed changes

(d) due to temperature increase based on 2010 emission levels

Figure S6. Monthly mean changes of sulfate (a), nitrate (b), ammonium (c), BC (d), OC (e), and

PM2.5 (f) and due to temperature increase based on 2010 emission levels

Figure S7. Monthly mean changes of PM2.5 (a), LWP (b), and AOD at 600nm (c) due to RH decrease

based on 2010 emission levels

Figure S1. Model domain settings

Page 3: Supplement of · Figure S1. Model domain settings Figure S2. The impacts of boundary conditions on monthly averaged PM 2.5 concentrations in the innermost domain Figure S3. Averaged

Figure S2. The impacts of boundary conditions on monthly averaged PM2.5 concentrations in the

innermost domain

Figure S3. Averaged VOC:NOx ratios in 1960(a) and 2010(b)

Page 4: Supplement of · Figure S1. Model domain settings Figure S2. The impacts of boundary conditions on monthly averaged PM 2.5 concentrations in the innermost domain Figure S3. Averaged

Figure S4. Changes in LWP due to temperature perturbations

Figure S5. Monthly mean temperature difference due to perturbation in initial and boundary

conditions (a), and daily mean OH (b), mean PBLH (c) and mean near surface wind speed changes (d)

due to temperature increase based on 2010 emission levels

Page 5: Supplement of · Figure S1. Model domain settings Figure S2. The impacts of boundary conditions on monthly averaged PM 2.5 concentrations in the innermost domain Figure S3. Averaged

Figure S6. Monthly mean changes of sulfate (a), nitrate (b), ammonium (c), BC (d), OC (e), and

PM2.5 (f) and due to temperature increase based on 2010 emission levels

Figure S7. Monthly mean changes of PM2.5 (a), LWP (b), and AOD at 600nm (c) due to RH decrease

based on 2010 emission levels