9
Wasnik et al. Updated: July 6, 2018 1 SUPPLEMENTAL DATA 1 2 Defining the Role of M1 macrophage in Bone Repair 3 via the Function of 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D in M1/M2 Differentiation 4 Samiksha Wasnik 1 , Charles H Rundle 2 , David J Baylink 1 , Mohammad Safaie Yazdi 1 , Edmundo 5 E Carreon 1 , Yi Xu 1 , Xuezhong Qin 1,2 , Kin-Hing William Lau 1,2 , Xiaolei Tang 1* . 6 7 1 Division of Regenerative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma 8 Linda, CA.92354, USA 9 2 Musculoskeletal Disease Center, Jerry L. Pettis Memorial VA Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA 10 92357, USA 11 12 13 Running title: 1,25(OH) 2 D Blocks M1 Macrophage-MSC Crosstalk 14 15 *Correspondence should be addressed to: 16 Xiaolei Tang, MD/PhD, 17 Department of Medicine, 18 Division of Regenerative Medicine, 19 Loma Linda University, 20 Loma Linda, CA. 92354. 21 Phone: (909) 651-5891; 22 Fax: (909) 558-0428. 23 Email: [email protected]. 24 25 The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA 2 Defining the Role of M1 macrophage in ... · Wasnik et al. Updated: July 6, 2018 1 1 SUPPLEMENTAL DATA 2 Defining the Role of M1 macrophage in Bone Repair 3 4

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: SUPPLEMENTAL DATA 2 Defining the Role of M1 macrophage in ... · Wasnik et al. Updated: July 6, 2018 1 1 SUPPLEMENTAL DATA 2 Defining the Role of M1 macrophage in Bone Repair 3 4

Wasnik et al. Updated: July 6, 2018

1

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA 1

2

Defining the Role of M1 macrophage in Bone Repair 3

via the Function of 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D in M1/M2 Differentiation 4

Samiksha Wasnik1, Charles H Rundle

2, David J Baylink

1, Mohammad Safaie Yazdi

1, Edmundo 5

E Carreon1, Yi Xu

1, Xuezhong Qin

1,2, Kin-Hing William Lau

1,2, Xiaolei Tang

1*. 6

7

1Division of Regenerative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma 8

Linda, CA.92354, USA 9

2Musculoskeletal Disease Center, Jerry L. Pettis Memorial VA Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA 10

92357, USA 11

12

13

Running title: 1,25(OH)2D Blocks M1 Macrophage-MSC Crosstalk 14

15

*Correspondence should be addressed to: 16

Xiaolei Tang, MD/PhD, 17

Department of Medicine, 18

Division of Regenerative Medicine, 19

Loma Linda University, 20

Loma Linda, CA. 92354. 21

Phone: (909) 651-5891; 22

Fax: (909) 558-0428. 23

Email: [email protected]. 24

25

The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists 26 27

28

29 30 31 32

33

Page 2: SUPPLEMENTAL DATA 2 Defining the Role of M1 macrophage in ... · Wasnik et al. Updated: July 6, 2018 1 1 SUPPLEMENTAL DATA 2 Defining the Role of M1 macrophage in Bone Repair 3 4

Wasnik et al. Updated: July 6, 2018

2

34 35

Gene Forward Reverse

F4/80 CTTTGG CTATGGGCTTCCAGTC GCAAGGAGGACAGAGTTTATCGTG

IL-1α AGGGAGTCAACTCATTGGCG ACTTCTGCCTGACGAGCTTC

IL-1β GTCGCTCAGGGTCACAAGAA GTGCTGCCTAATGTCCCCTT

IL-6 CTGCAAGAGACTTCCATCCAG AGTGGTATAGACAGGTCTGTTGG

CD11b CCATGACCTTCCAAGAGAATGC ACCGGCTTGTGCTGTAGTC

TNF-α GAACTCCAGGCGGTGCCTAT TCGGCTGGCACCACTAGTTG

OSM ATGCAGACACGGCTTCTAAGA TTGGAGCAGCCACGATTGG

CD90 TGCTCTCAGTCTTGCAGGTG TGGATGGAGTTATCCTTGGTGTT

CD105 TGCACTTGGCCTACGACTC TGGAGGTAAGGGATGGTAGCA

CD73 AACCCCTTTCCTCTCAAATCCA CAGGGCGATGATCTTATTCACAT

OCN CTGACCTCACAGATCCCAAGC TGGTCTGATAGCTCGTCACAAG

OSX GGAAAGGAGGCACAAAGAAGC CCCCTTAGGCACTAGGAGC

Runx2 TTCAACGATCTGAGATTTGTGGG GGATGAGGAATGCGCCCTA

GAPDH TGGCAAAGTGGAGATTGTTGCC AAGATGGTGATGGGCTTCCCG

Notes: F4/80: adhesion G protein-coupled receptor E1, IL-1: Interleukin-1α; IL-1: Interleukin-36

1β;, CD11b: Cluster of differentiation 11b, IL-6: Interleukin-6;, TNF-α :Tumor Necrosis Factor -37

α ,OSM: Oncostatin M, CD90: Thy1, CD105: Endoglin, CD73: 5'-Nucleotidase, 38

OCN:Osteocalcin, OSX-:Osterix, Runx2-:Runt related transcription factor 2, GAPDH: 39

Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. 40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

Table S1. List of primers used in this study

Page 3: SUPPLEMENTAL DATA 2 Defining the Role of M1 macrophage in ... · Wasnik et al. Updated: July 6, 2018 1 1 SUPPLEMENTAL DATA 2 Defining the Role of M1 macrophage in Bone Repair 3 4

Wasnik et al. Updated: July 6, 2018

3

53

54

55

Day 4

Proteins\MFIs\Tx Intact bones Fractured bones

VC 100ng/kg VD 1000ng/kg VD

IL-1β 269.6±10.33**** 994.3±51.26 712.3±6.6*** 649.5±3.6***

IL-12 333.5±47.5*** 540±25.5 500.3±44 ns

450.3±38 ns

IL-6 485.3±44.2**** 815.4±5.9 479.2±37.8**** 436.2±37.8****

TNF-α 435±6.6**** 875.6±32.2 868±14.7 ns

805.5±12.6 ns

OSM-M 666±30.7*** 1162±74.3 946±35.8 ns

667.3±67.2***

56

Day 7

Proteins\MFIs\Tx Intact bones Fractured bones

VC 100ng/kg VD 1000ng/kg VD

IL-1β 1227±42.0 ns

1381±72.8 1661±31.8 ns

1585±97.2 ns

IL-12 1123±25.3*** 1648.5±1.2 1798±1.6* 1579.5±20.0 ns

IL-6 1641±143.1 ns

1893±39.5 1791±25.5 ns

1769±72.1 ns

TNF-α 2268±177.6 ns

2349.6±57.5 2160±19.6 ns

2101±107.3 ns

OSM-M 1531.5±92.5 ns

1557±199.0 1489.667±9.7 ns

1725.5±60.5 ns

57

Note: “VD”: 1,25(OH)2D. “VC”: vehicle. “Tx”: treatment. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001, 58 ****P≤ 0.0001, “ns”: not significant. ANOVA test: vehicle vs intact bones, 100ng/kg VD, and 59

1000ng/kg VD. 60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

Table S2. Mean fluorescence intensities (MFIs) of secreted

proteins in CD11b+F4/80

+ macrophages at fracture sites

Page 4: SUPPLEMENTAL DATA 2 Defining the Role of M1 macrophage in ... · Wasnik et al. Updated: July 6, 2018 1 1 SUPPLEMENTAL DATA 2 Defining the Role of M1 macrophage in Bone Repair 3 4

Wasnik et al. Updated: July 6, 2018

4

69

70

71

Day 4

MSC\%\Tx Intact bones Fractured bones

VC 100ng/kg VD 1000ng/kg VD

CD90 3.705±0.2*** 8.1±0.03 4.2±0.4 ** 3.9±0.3**

CD105 7.4±2.0* 14.9±0.5 9.8±0.7 ns

6.9±1.95*

CD29 9.6±2.5* 20.28±1.3 16.6±2.3 ns

15.3±3.7 ns

CD73 6.42±1.7** 14.9±0.6 11.8±1.2 ns

8.1±0.1*

72

Day 7

MSC\%\Tx Intact bones Fractured bones

VC 100ng/kg VD 1000ng/kg VD

CD90 7.2±0.2 ns

10.5±0.9 16.9±0.7** 19±2.7**

CD105 2±0.5 ns

3.17±0.8 7.09±0.9* 6.5±0.9 ns

CD29 11.5±0.5 ns

11.47±0.8 21.6±2.5** 22.3±0.35**

CD73 9.0±1.3 ns

7.8±0.5 17.02±1.8* 16.0±3.7*

73

Note: “VD”: 1,25(OH)2D. “VC”: vehicle. “Tx”: treatment. *P≤ 0.05, **P≤ 0.01, ***P≤ 0.001, 74 ****P≤ 0.0001, “ns”: not significant. ANOVA test: vehicle vs intact bones, 100ng/kg VD, 75

1000ng/kg VD. 76

77

78

79

Table S3. Percent of MSC cell populations at days 4 and 7 post fracture surgery

Page 5: SUPPLEMENTAL DATA 2 Defining the Role of M1 macrophage in ... · Wasnik et al. Updated: July 6, 2018 1 1 SUPPLEMENTAL DATA 2 Defining the Role of M1 macrophage in Bone Repair 3 4

Wasnik et al. Updated: July 6, 2018

5

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

Figure S1. Local subcutaneous treatment with 1,25(OH)2D during the regenerative stage 96 did not impair fracture repair. A) C57BL/6 mice were subject to fracture surgery (Fx). Ten 97

days later, the animals subcutaneously received at the fracture sites a daily dose of either vehicle 98

(VC) or 100ng/kg/mouse 1,25(OH)2D (VD). X-ray images of the fractured bones were taken at 99

days 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28. At day 28, fractured bones were analyzed by microCT. B) 100

Representative x-ray images of fracture sites are shown. C) X-ray images were scored at day 14 101 for callus formation and at day 28 for bone union and cortex remodeling.

#P>0.05. t-test. N=5. D) 102

Representative microCT 3D images are shown. E) Cumulative data show BV/TV (bone 103 volume/total volume), Tb.N (trabecular number), and Tb.th (trabecular thickness) from the 104 microCT analysis. *P<0.05;

#P>0.05. t-test. N=5. 105

106

107

108

109

110

Page 6: SUPPLEMENTAL DATA 2 Defining the Role of M1 macrophage in ... · Wasnik et al. Updated: July 6, 2018 1 1 SUPPLEMENTAL DATA 2 Defining the Role of M1 macrophage in Bone Repair 3 4

Wasnik et al. Updated: July 6, 2018

6

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

118

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126

Figure S2. Local subcutaneous treatment with 1,25(OH)2D during the pro-inflammatory 127

stage decreased the expression of marker genes for M1 macrophages at fracture sites. A) 128 C57BL/6 mice were subject to fracture surgery (Fx). Immediately after the fracture surgery, the 129

animals subcutaneously received at the fracture sites a daily treatment (Tx) with vehicle (VC) or 130

100ng/kg/mouse 1,25(OH)2D (VD). At days 1, 4, and 7, contralateral bones (Intact bones) and 131

the bones at fracture sites (fractured bones) were examined by RT-qPCR analysis. B) Data show 132 mRNA expressions of the marker genes for pan-macrophage (i.e. F4/80 and CD11b). C) Data 133

show mRNA expressions of the marker genes for M1 macrophages (IL-1 and IL-1). Data are 134 means ± SE. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; ****P<0.0001. ANOVA test. N=3. 135 136

137

138 139 140 141 142

Page 7: SUPPLEMENTAL DATA 2 Defining the Role of M1 macrophage in ... · Wasnik et al. Updated: July 6, 2018 1 1 SUPPLEMENTAL DATA 2 Defining the Role of M1 macrophage in Bone Repair 3 4

Wasnik et al. Updated: July 6, 2018

7

143

144

145

146

147

148

149

150

151

152

153

154

155

156

157 Figure S3. Bone fracture and 1,25(OH)2D treatment had moderate effects on peripheral 158 lymphoid systems. C57BL/6 mice were subjected to fracture surgery and immediately after the 159

fracture surgery received a daily dose of either vehicle (VC) or 100ng/kg 1,25 (OH)2D (VD) 160 subcutaneously near fracture sites. Additionally, a group of healthy animals was also included as 161 a control. At days 1, 4, and 7 post treatments, splenocytes were analyzed by FACS and RT-162

qPCR. A) Representative FACS dot plots show the expressions of IL-1β, IL-12, TNF-α, IL-4, IL-163

10 and arginase 1 (ARG1) among CD11b+F4/80

+ monocytes/macrophages in splenocytes on day 164

1 after the treatments. B) Cumulative data of mean fluorescent intensities (MFIs) of IL-1β, IL-165

12, TNF-α, IL-4, IL-10, and ARG1 in CD11b+F4/80

+ monocytes/macrophages in splenocytes on 166

day 1 after the treatments. E) RT-qPCR analyses show the mRNA expressions of iNOS and 167 ARG1 in the splenocytes at days 1 and 4 after the treatments. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. 168 Two way ANOVA test. N=3. 169 170

171

172

173

174

Page 8: SUPPLEMENTAL DATA 2 Defining the Role of M1 macrophage in ... · Wasnik et al. Updated: July 6, 2018 1 1 SUPPLEMENTAL DATA 2 Defining the Role of M1 macrophage in Bone Repair 3 4

Wasnik et al. Updated: July 6, 2018

8

175

176

177

178

179

180

181

182

183

184

185

186

187

188

189

190

Figure S4. 1,25(OH)2D, when locally administered at proinflammatory stage, decreased the 191 expressions of MSC markers. A) C57BL/6 mice were subjected to fracture surgery (Fx). 192

Immediately after the fracture surgery, the animals subcutaneously received a daily dose of either 193

vehicle (VC) or 1,25(OH)2D (100ng/kg) (VD) near fracture sites. Intact and fractured bones were 194

collected from the animals at days 1, 4, and 7 for analysis by RT-qPCR. B) Data show the 195

mRNA expressions of CD90, CD105, and CD73 at days 1 and 4. Data are means ± SEM. 196 *P<0.05; **P<0.005; ***P<0.001; ****P<0.0001. ANOVA test. N=3. C) Paraffin sections of 197 intact and fractured bones were stained for CD90 by DAB staining. Representative images are 198 shown. 199 200

201 202

203

204

205

Page 9: SUPPLEMENTAL DATA 2 Defining the Role of M1 macrophage in ... · Wasnik et al. Updated: July 6, 2018 1 1 SUPPLEMENTAL DATA 2 Defining the Role of M1 macrophage in Bone Repair 3 4

Wasnik et al. Updated: July 6, 2018

9

206

207

208

209

210

211

212

213

214

215

216

217

218

219

220

221

222

223

Figure S5. Local subcutaneous treatment with 1,25(OH)2D during pro-inflammatory stage 224

decreased the expression of marker genes of M1 macrophage-associated proteins important 225 for osteogenic priming of MSCs and for bone repair. A) C57BL/6 mice were subjected to 226

fracture surgery (Fx), treatments (Tx), and analyses as described in Figure S2. B) Data show the 227

mRNA expressions of oncostatin-M (OSM), TNF-, and IL-6 at days 1, 4, and 7 after the 228 treatments. 229 230 231 232

233