3
Supplementary Fig. S1: GO classification of 2,318 differentially expressed genes during fruit ripening in tomato. The genes which show differential expression in at least one stage, out of the total four different ripening transition phases (Kumar et al., 2012), including mature green versus breaker, breaker versus breaker+3, breaker+3 versus breaker+7 and breaker+7 versus breaker+20 in wild type were used for the study. All the differentially expressed genes (p value≤0.05, FC≥2 fold) were sorted for unique gene list. The differentially expressed genes were used for GO classification, based on biological process, using tomato functional genomics database (http://ted.bti.cornell.edu/).The output was use to make the final graph using MS excel.

Supplementary Fig. S1: GO classification of 2,318 differentially expressed genes during fruit ripening in tomato. The genes which show differential expression

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

B LeafShootFlowerRootMGRRB WT SlHDC10-FL C GUS Activity (nmoles 4MU/hr/mg protein) GUS NOS 5' +1 SlHDC10-Fl GUS -968 NOS SlHDC10-DI +1 GUS -668 NOS SlHDC10-DII +1 A CArG box Nitrate responsive element Ethylene responsive element Ethylene biosynthesis element Supplementary Fig. S3: (A) Scheme of SlHDC10 full length and deletion GUS reporter constructs. Presence of different important cis-regulatory elements and their subsequent deletions in the deletion constructs are shown in figure. (B) & (C) Histochemical analysis of GUS activity in different tissues of transgenic tomato lines. For histochemical assay of three independent transgenic lines were used and data of a representative line is presented. For fluorimetric analysis at least three independent transgenic lines which gave GUS staining were taken and three biological replicate for each line were utilized and average of fluorimetry reading were taken for calculation.

Citation preview

Page 1: Supplementary Fig. S1: GO classification of 2,318 differentially expressed genes during fruit ripening in tomato. The genes which show differential expression

Supplementary Fig. S1: GO classification of 2,318 differentially expressed genes during fruit ripening in tomato. The genes which show differential expression in at least one stage, out of the total four different ripening transition phases (Kumar et al., 2012), including mature green versus breaker, breaker versus breaker+3, breaker+3 versus breaker+7 and breaker+7 versus breaker+20 in wild type were used for the study. All the differentially expressed genes (p value≤0.05, FC≥2 fold) were sorted for unique gene list. The differentially expressed genes were used for GO classification, based on biological process, using tomato functional genomics database (http://ted.bti.cornell.edu/).The output was use to make the final graph using MS excel. Functional categories with at least 50 or more genes were used to make final graph.

Page 2: Supplementary Fig. S1: GO classification of 2,318 differentially expressed genes during fruit ripening in tomato. The genes which show differential expression

SlAAD3:C

aAAD3

SlAAD4:C

aAAD4

SlGAD

4:CaG

AD4, C

aGAD

5SlH

DC

1:CaH

DC

1SlH

DC

9:CaH

DC

11SlH

DC

15:CaAAD

5SlG

AD1:C

aGAD

3

Supplementary Fig. S2: Syntelog analysis between tomato and pepper. The analysis was performed as described in earlier.

Page 3: Supplementary Fig. S1: GO classification of 2,318 differentially expressed genes during fruit ripening in tomato. The genes which show differential expression

B Leaf Shoot FlowerRoot MG RRB

WT

SlH

DC

10-F

L

C

0

5

10

15

20

25

Leaf Root Shoot Flower MG Br RR

WT L1 L2 L3

GU

S A

ctiv

ity

(nm

oles

4M

U/h

r/mg

prot

ein)

GUS-1599

NOS5'

+1SlHDC10-Fl

GUS-968

NOSSlHDC10-DI

+1

GUS-668

NOSSlHDC10-DII

+1

A

CArG box

Nitrate responsive element

Ethylene responsive element

Ethylene biosynthesis element

Supplementary Fig. S3: (A) Scheme of SlHDC10 full length and deletion GUS reporter constructs. Presence of different important cis-regulatory elements and their subsequent deletions in the deletion constructs are shown in figure. (B) & (C) Histochemical analysis of GUS activity in different tissues of transgenic tomato lines. For histochemical assay of three independent transgenic lines were used and data of a representative line is presented. For fluorimetric analysis at least three independent transgenic lines which gave GUS staining were taken and three biological replicate for each line were utilized and average of fluorimetry reading were taken for calculation.