Upload
aerona
View
34
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Support for the integration of modelling in the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive. Georgios Kokogiannakis. Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD). EPB Directive 2002/91/EC: Proposal published on 11 May 2001 Came into force on 4 January 2003 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Support for the integration of modelling in the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive
Georgios Kokogiannakis
Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD)
EPB Directive 2002/91/EC:Proposal published on 11 May 2001Came into force on 4 January 2003On January 2006, Member States have to put the
Directive into practice through their own legislation Objective: promote the cost-effective improvement
of energy performance of buildings
Energy Performance of Buildings Directive – why? Europe is worried about the security of Energy
Supply Kyoto protocol obligation to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions Limited impact on supply but potential savings
on demand and mainly at buildings
Energy Performance of Buildings Directive – what? Calls for a common methodology for an integrated energy performance of buildings based on technical annex
…integrated……integrated…
Energy Performance of Buildings Directive – what? Calls for a common methodology for an integrated energy performance of buildings based on technical annex
…integrated……integrated…
Sustainability & Directive
Does the Directive cover the set of aspects that society is interested in during the sustainable design of buildings?
How is it going to evolve?
Sustainability & Directive
Acoustics, Local thermal & visual comfort, contaminants concentration, surface condensation, e.t.c….
Integrative modelling
Buildings:Systematic (many parts make the whole)Dynamic (the parts evolve at different rates)Non-linear (the parameters depend on the
thermodynamic state)Complex (myriad interactions)
Integrative modelling
Preserves the integrity of building/plant system Cheaper & quicker feedback on alternative
design approaches Large number of assessment under realistic
conditions
Methodology in UK
Domestic buildings:Simplified methods (SAP2005 in England and
Wales, SERT in Scotland)
Non-domestic buildings:Detailed thermal modelling softwareNew simplified tool (NCT) based on the Dutch
Standard NEN 2916:1998
Which method? Is a simplified method enough to cover
appropriate the building sustainability issues? What are the dangers of using such a method? If modelling:
How should users select modelling tools?
Case studies Two modelling tools (ESP-r & EnergyPlus) Simplified method Dutch Standard NEN 2916:1998
Base Case
• Change orientation
• Change constructions
• Change occupancy patterns
• Change climate
• Change ventilation strategies
• Change shading strategies
• Heating and cooling loads
• Daylight & glare
• Peak & Mean Air Temperatures
• Overheating risk
• Thermal comfort
• ……
Case studies Inability of the simplified method to deal with
some of the assessments Simplified method – not “simplified” for use Simplified method produces different results
than the two modelling tools Differences in some cases between the results
of the two modelling tools
Software accreditation “Online” validation: Embedded validation tests in
the modelling tool (ESP-r) Users can access & choose testsRun them automatically with pre-defined
parameters Results analysis is automatically invoked Specific results for every test are recovered and
saved in a file…
Software accreditation “Online” validation: Embedded validation tests
in the modelling tool (ESP-r)ESP-r reads a recovery data file A check is made whether or not the recovered
results are within the specified rangeResults from the previous released version or
another version of the past are also displayed
“Online validation” - Benefits
Developers can check the impact of code modifications
Developers can check compliance with regulations
Frequent checking will confirm the fact that a program continues to be within the specified tolerance bands
“Online validation” - Benefits
User confidence is improved Users can confirm their installation is correct
and check Standards compliance themselves No need for repeating the construction of the
models set out in the validation tests
Summary EPB Directive is a good first step Expected to evolve to cover more sustainability
issues Need for a methodology that integrates these
issues Modelling exists and has the capability to deal
with these issues Accreditation process needed “Online validation” can offer useful benefits