Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
S1
Supporting Information
New 12,8-Eudesmanolides from Eutypella sp. 1-15
Yuezhou Wang1,2,#
, Yue Wang1,2,#
, An-an Wu3, Lei zhang
1,2, Zhiyu Hu
1,2, Huiying
Huang1,2
, Qingyan Xu1,2,*
and Xianming Deng1,2,*
1State Key Laboratory of Cellular Stress Biology, Innovation Center for Cell Signaling
Network, School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361102, China. 2State-province Joint Engineering Laboratory of Targeted Drugs from Natural Products,
Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361102, China. 3State Key Laboratory for Physical Chemistry of Solid Surface, College of Chemistry and
Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, 361005,China. #These authors contributed equally to this work.
*Correspondence: Professor Qingyan Xu or Professor Xianming Deng, E-mail:
S2
General procedures: UV spectra were measured using a Jasco V-530
spectrophotometer. Optical rotations were acquired on a PerkinElmer 341 polarimeter
(PerkinElmer Inc.) using a 1 cm cell. IR spectra were acquired on a PerkinElmer 552
spectrophotometer. 1H, 13C, and 2D NMR spectra were obtained on a Bruker
Avance-600 spectrometer (600 MHz) using TMS as the internal standard. Electrospray
ionization (ESI) low-resolution LC/MS data were medsured on a Thermo-Finnigan LCQ
Advantage mass spectrometer. High-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectra
(HR-ESI-MS) was obtained on a Bruker LC-QTOF mass spectrometer. ECD spectrum
was recorded on a Circular Dichroism Spectrometer (JASCO Corporation, Japan). TLC
detection was carried out using precoated silica gel GF254 plates (10−40 μm, Qingdao
Marine Chemical Plant). Column chromatography was performed with silica gel
(200−300 mesh, Qingdao Marine Chemical Plant), reversed-phase RP-18 (40−63 μm,
Merck), and Sephadex LH-20 (Amersham Biosciences).
Fermentation and Extraction: The strain Eutypella sp. 1-15 was inoculated on rice
medium containing rice 1000g, NaCl 100g in 1.0 L water and cultured at 28 ºC for 27
days. A total of 2 L of fungal solid culture was prepared. The fermented agar cakes were
diced and extracted with EtOAc−MeOH− AcOH (v/v/v, 80/15/5, 3 × 4 L). After the
removal of solvents under vacuum, the extract was suspended in EtOAc and washed with
H2O; then the EtOAc layer was concentrated and resuspended in MeOH and petroleum
ether. The MeOH layer was concentrated to give the crude extract (5.6 g).
Isolation of compounds 1−4: The MeOH extract was fractionated by
medium-pressure liquid chromatography over an RP-18 column (170 g) eluting with a
MeOH−H2O gradient (v/v, from 10% to 100% in 4 h, flow rate of 25 mL/min) to afford
fractions a−h. The 30-35% MeOH fraction, b (967.7 mg) , was sequentially subjected to
Sephadex LH-20 (2.5 × 150 cm) eluting with MeOH to get subfractions b-5 (40.1 mg),
then subjected to silica gel chromatography eluting with petroleum ether /acetone (v/v,
15:1) to afford 3 (5.1 mg). The 45-60% MeOH fraction, d (775.3 mg), was subjected to
Sephadex LH-20 (2.5 × 150 cm) eluting with MeOH to afford subfractions d-4 (180.0
mg), d-6 (149.2 mg). d-4 was subjected Sephadex LH-20 (2.5 × 80 cm) eluting with
acetone−MeOH (v/v, 4:1) to affod d-4-2 (75.4 mg), d-4-3 (35.9 mg), d-4-2 was subjected
to silica gel chromatography eluting with petroleum ether/acetone (v/v, 30:1) to afford 5
(49.1 mg). d-4-3 was chromatographied on LH-20 (2.5 × 80 cm) eluting with acetone to
afford 4 (6.1 mg) as a pure compound (elution volume 50-64 mL). d-6 was subjected to
silica gel chromatography eluting with petroleum ether/acetone (v/v, 25:1) to give 2 (81.2
mg). The 60-65% MeOH fraction, e (213.4 mg), was subjected to Sephadex LH-20 (2.5 ×
150 cm) eluting with MeOH to give subfraction e-4 (187.1 mg), then subjected to silica
gel chromatography eluting with petroleum ether/acetone (v/v, 20:1) to give 1 (20.1 mg).
S3
(1): colorless oil; 20
D +10.4 (c 0.87, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 200 (3.47), 281
(2.78) nm; IR (KBr): 790, 1001, 1435, 1762, 2927, 3420 cm-1
; 1H and
13C NMR data,
Table 1; HR-ESI-MS m/z 247.1329 [M + H]+ (calcd for C15H19O3 247.1329).
(2): colorless solid; 20
D +70.2 (c 1, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 200 (3.46), 329
(2.57) nm; IR (KBr): 994, 1076, 1231, 1614, 1758, 2926, 3419 cm-1
; 1H and
13C NMR
data, Table 1; HR-ESI-MS m/z 245.1172 [M + H]+ (calcd for C15H17O3, 245.1172).
(3): yellow powder;20
D +162.1 (c 0.5，MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 200 (3.45),
335 (2.31) nm; IR(KBr): 1247, 1374, 1663, 1762, 2359, 2926, 3415 cm-1
; 1H and
13C
NMR data, Table 1; HR-ESI-MS m/z 259.0965 [M + H]+ (calcd for C15H15O4, 259.0965).
(4): colorless oil; 20
D -40.9 (c 0.6，MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 225(3.48) nm;
IR(KBr): 1010, 1436, 1734, 2918, 3450 cm-1
; 1H and
13C NMR data, Table 1;
HR-ESI-MS m/z [M+H]+
265.1435 (calcd for C15H21O4, 265.1434).
Computational Analysis: In this work, all calculations were performed with the
Gaussian 09 package.1 For the geometry optimization, the calculations were performed
by B3LYP2-3
in conjunction with the basis set of 6-31+G(D,P)4. Analytical frequencies
were calculated in order to confirm that a local minimum has no imaginary frequency.
The ECD data were calculated using TDDFT(CAM-B3LYP)5 with the basis set
6-311+G(D,P)6 for all atoms. As far as the solvent is concerned, its effects were included
by the PCM7 model for all calculations. The ECD spectra were obtained by the following
equation:
where is the width of the band at 1/e height (fixed at 0.30 eV), Ei and Ri are the
excitation energies and rotatory strengths for transition i, respectively.
The specific rotation was calculated using B3LYP in conjunction with the
6-311+G(D,P) basis set.
S4
Figure S1.1H NMR spectrum of 1 in acetone-d6
S5
Figure S2.13C NMR spectrum of 1 in acetone-d6
S6
Figure S3. 1H-1H COSY spectrum of 1 in acetone-d6
S7
Figure S4. HSQC spectrum of 1 in acetone-d6
S8
Figure S5. HMBC spectrum of 1 in acetone-d6
S9
Figure S6. NOESY spectrum of 1 in acetone-d6
S10
Figure S7. HRESIMS spectrum of 1
S11
Figure S8.1H NMR spectrum of 2 in Acetone-d6
S12
Figure S9.13C NMR spectrum of 2 in Acetone-d6
S13
Figure S10. 1H-1H COSY spectrum of 2 in acetone-d6
S14
Figure S11.HSQC spectrum of 2 in Acetone-d6
S15
Figure S12. HMBC spectrum of 2 in Acetone-d6
S16
Figure S13. HRESIMS spectrum of 2
S17
Figure S14. 1H NMR spectrum of 3 in acetone-d6
S18
Figure S15. 13C NMR spectrum of 3 in acetone-d6
S19
Figure S16. HSQC spectrum of 3 in Acetone-d6
S20
Figure S17.HMBC spectrum of 3 in Acetone-d6
S21
Figure S18. HRESIMS spectrum of 3
S22
Figure S19. 1H NMR spectrum of 4 in Acetone-d6
S23
Figure S20. 13C NMR spectrum of 4 in Acetone-d6
S24
Figure S21. HSQC spectrum of 4 in Acetone-d6
S25
Figure S22. HMBC spectrum of 4 in Acetone-d6
S26
Figure S23. NOESY spectrum of 4 in Acetone-d6
S27
Figure S24. Enlarged NOESY spectrum of 4 in Acetone-d6
S28
Figure S25.HRESIMS spectrum of 4
S29
Figure S26.1H NMR spectrum of 5 in Acetone-d6
S30
Figure S27.13C NMR spectrum of 5 in Acetone-d6
S31
References
1. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.;
Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Caricato, M.; Li, X.; Hratchian, H. P.; Izmaylov, A. F.; Bloino, J.; Zheng, G.;
Sonnenberg, J. L.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.;
Nakai, H.; Vreven, T.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Peralta, J. E.; Ogliaro, F.; Bearpark, M.; Heyd, J. J.; Brothers, E.; Kudin, K. N.;
Staroverov, V. N.; Kobayashi, R.; Normand, J.; Raghavachari, K.; Rendell, A.; Burant, J. C.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Cossi, M.;
Rega, N.; Millam, J. M.; Klene, M.; Knox, J. E.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R.
E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Martin, R. L.; Morokuma, K.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Voth,
G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Farkas, O.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cioslowski, J.; Fox,
D. J. Gaussian 09, Revision A. 01;Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2009.
2. Becke, A.D. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 38, 3098.
3. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Par, R. G. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785.
4. Peterson, G.A.; Al-Laham, M.A. J. Chem.Phys. 1991, 94, 6081.
5. Yanai, T.; Tew, D.; Handy, N. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 393.51.
6. Krishman, R.; Binkley, J. S.; Seeger, R.; Pople, J. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 72, 650.
7. Tomasi, J.; Mennucci, B.;Cammi, R. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 2999.
