Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Supporting InformationLindqvist et al. 10.1073/pnas.0914266107
Fig. S1. mtDNA sequence coverage per site over the entire mtDNA genome from the 454 shotgun fragment runs of the Poolepynten specimen.
Lindqvist et al. www.pnas.org/cgi/content/short/0914266107 1 of 8
Poolepynten specimen
14KB U. arctosBaranof Island
12WH U. arctosA9105 U. arctosAdmiralty Island
76824 U. arctosKodiak Island
2495 U. maritimusDiomedeLittle Diomede Island
2629 U. maritimusSavoongaSt. Lawrence Island
Poolepynten coastal cliffs(78°27′N, 11°44′E)Prins Karls ForlandSvalbard
Arct
ic C
ircle
NorthPole
Fig. S2. Map of the Arctic showing sampling sites of specimens analyzed in this study.
Lindqvist et al. www.pnas.org/cgi/content/short/0914266107 2 of 8
U. maritimus SAVO2629U. maritimus DIOM2495U. maritimus AJ428577U. maritimus NC_003428
Poolepynten specimen
U. arctos AdmA91-05U. arctos Adm12WH
U. arctos Baranof14KBU. arctos EU497665
U. arctos Kodiak76824U. arctos NC_003427
U. spelaeus EU327344U. spelaeus NC_011112
U. americanus NC_003426U. thibetanus NC_009971U. thibetanus NC_008753
U. malayanus NC_009968Ursus ursinus NC_009970
Arctodus simus NC_011116Tremarctos ornatus NC_009969
Ailuropoda melanoleuca FM177761
100
100
57
87100
100
100
100
100
100 100
97
10080
10099
Fig. S3. Molecular phylogeny of the Ursidae based on maximum parsimony (MP) analysis of complete mtDNA genome sequences [excluding the variable-number tandem repeats (VNTR) repeat region of the D loop]. One most-parsimonious tree of 8715 steps resulted from an analysis using a comprehensive MPapproach with a variety of tree space exploration techniques as implemented in TNT (1). Bootstrap support values are shown below branches.
1. Goloboff PA, Farris JS, Nixon KC (2008) TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24:774–786.
giant panda
spetacled bearAmerican giantshort-faced bearsloth bear
sun bear
American black bear
Asian black bear
Asian black bear
cave bear
cave bear
Kodiak bearbrown bear (east)
brown bear (west)
brown bear (Baranof)
brown bear (Admiralty)
brown bear (Admiralty)
Poolepynten specimenpolar bear
polar bear (E Greenland)
polar bear (Alaska)
polar bear (Alaska)
100
100
100
100100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
93
100
92
90
99
Fig. S4. Molecular phylogeny of the Ursidae based on maximum likelihood (ML) analyses of complete mtDNA genome sequences (excluding the VNTR repeatregion of the D loop). The phylogram with bootstrap support values shown below branches resulted from ML analysis using a rapid bootstrap algorithm asimplemented in RAxML (1). The mtDNA genome sequences (previously published and this study) are identical to the ones shown in Fig. S3. The previouslypublished brown bear sequences represent “eastern” (east) and “western” (west) lineages (2).
1. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J (2008) A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML Web servers. Syst Biol 75:758–771.2. Bon C, et al. (2008) Deciphering the complete mitochondrial genome and phylogeny of the extinct cave bear in the Paleolithic painted cave of Chauvet. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:
17447–17452.
Lindqvist et al. www.pnas.org/cgi/content/short/0914266107 3 of 8
Umar_2495, Alaska
Umar_IDNR23479, Barents Sea/Svalbard
Umar_IDNR23530, Barents Sea/Svalbard
Umar_IDNR23395, Barents Sea/Svalbard
Umar_IDNR7944, Barents Sea/Svalbard
Poolepynten specimen
Umar_AF303111
Umar_2629, Alaska
brown bear ‘eastern lineage’
modern polar bear
brown bear Alaska/Yukon
Fig. S5. Maximum clade probability tree from a BEAST analysis of short mtDNA control-region sequences. The analysis is based on 197 base-pair sequences fromcarbon-datedbrownbears (inblackbold) (1), theancientPoolepynten specimen(in red),andmodernbrownbearsandpolarbears, including four sequencesofmodernpolar bear from the Barents Sea/Svalbard (in blue). Numbers at nodes indicatemean ages inmillion years. BEAST parameters used: the General Time Reversible (GTR)substitutionmodel, Invariant Sites (I), andGamma4 (Γ4) siteheterogeneitymodelwitha relaxeduncorrelated log-normal clock, a coalescentprior, andaMarkov chainMonte Carlo (MCMC) chain length of 50,000,000. Note that the Svalbard subfossil is considerably older in origin than any modern Svalbard polar bear sampled.
1. Barnes I, Matheus P, Shapiro B, Jensen D, Cooper A (2002) Dynamics of Pleistocene population extinction in Beringian brown bears. Science 295:2267–2270.
Lindqvist et al. www.pnas.org/cgi/content/short/0914266107 4 of 8
Fig. S6. (Continued)
Lindqvist et al. www.pnas.org/cgi/content/short/0914266107 5 of 8
Fig. S6. Correct length of the VNTR for each mtDNA genome as determined by an Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer with the DNA 7500 kit.
Lindqvist et al. www.pnas.org/cgi/content/short/0914266107 6 of 8
Table S1. Sample information and summary of bear 454 sequencing runs
MID*Sample
IDMSM archive
no.† Species‡ Tissue Location454reads
No. mtreads
Complete(non-VNTR)§ Coverage
GenBankaccessionnumbers
1 503950 NK157104 U. arctos Muscle Alaska (Chilkoot Lake) 83,842 2 No NA NA2 14KB NK157109 U. arctos Muscle Alaska (Baranof Island) 82,790 3,425 Yes 50 GU5734893 12WH NK157111 U. arctos Muscle Alaska (Admiralty Island) 108,532 2,571 Yes 36 GU5734864 A91-05 NK157120 U. arctos Muscle Alaska (Admiralty Island) 10,428 4,866 Yes 70 GU5734875 84688 NK157123 U.arctos Muscle Alaska (Chichagof Island) 44,266 5 No NA NA6 76946 NK157129 U. arctos Muscle Alaska (Kodiak Island) 146 18 No NA NA7 76824 NK157130 U. arctos Muscle Alaska (Kodiak Island) 78,018 891 Yes 12 GU5734918 542 NK157137 U. maritimus Homogenate Alaska (Barrow) 120,195 261 No 3.5 NA9 2495 NK157142 U. maritimus Muscle Alaska (Little Diomede Island) 70,862 4,685 Yes 68 GU57349010 2629 NK157143 U. maritimus Muscle Alaska (St. Lawrence Island) 25,560 1,855 Yes 23 GU573485NA NA NA U. maritimus Tooth Svalbard (Poolepynten) 482,364 1,290 Yes 14 GU573488
*MID, multiplex identifiers (Methods); NA, not applicable.†Aliquots of the modern bear tissues are archived at the Museum of Southwestern Biology (MSM).‡The modern polar bear samples were harvested in 1998 (542), 2001 (2495), and 2002 (2629), that is, before listing of the species in the Endangered Species Act,by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Marine Region 7 Mammal Management Office.§Four samples provided too low percentages of mitochondrial reads to assemble the mt genome.
Lindqvist et al. www.pnas.org/cgi/content/short/0914266107 7 of 8
Table
S2.
Summaryofresu
ltsfrom
differentBEA
STan
alyses
based
ondifferentdatasets(this
study)
andco
mparisonofdivergen
cetimes
foundin
other
releva
nt,previously
published
studies.
Amea
nag
eof12
0thousand(k)ye
arsforthePo
olepyn
tensu
bfossilpolarbea
rwas
usedin
additionto
datafrom
twocarbon-dated
cave
bea
rmtgen
ome
sequen
ces(1,2)
Time-MRCA*
Yuet
al.,20
07(3)
Krause
etal.,20
08(2)
Bonet
al.,20
08(1)
Brown-A
BC-polaronly
excludingrepea
t
Sun-black-cav
e-brown-
ABC-polarex
cluding
repea
t(rep
orted
inFig.1)
Sloth-sun-black-cav
e-
brown-A
BC-polar
includingrepea
t
Sloth
+sun/black/
brown/cav
e/polar
6.34
(5.95–
6.73
)5.39
(4.2–6.86
)3.0(2.2–3.8)
NA
NA
2.59
(1.32–
4.05
)
Sun/black
+cave
/polar/
brown
6.13
(5.54–
6.72
)5.05
(3.9–6.48
)2.8(2.1–3.5)
NA
2.60
(1.85–
3.42
)2.49
(1.26–
3.86
)
Cav
e+brown/polar
NA
2.75
(2.1–3.57
)1.6(1–2.1)
NA
1.43
(1.03–
1.88
)1.39
(0.67–
2.16
)Su
n+black
5.67
3(5.09–
6.26
)4.58
(3.51–
5.89
)2.4(1.7–3)
NA
2.35
(1.58–
3.16
)2.12
(0.88–
3.43
)Asiatic+American
black
5.19
(4.6–5.78
)4.08
(3.11–
5.27
)2.1(1.4–2.7)
NA
NA
1.85
(0.72–
2.97
)Brown+polar†
1.32
(0.93–
1.71
)0.88
(0.66–
1.17
)0.6(0.3–0.8)
east
brown;
0.4(0.2–0.5)
westbrown
0.44
(0.14–
0.97
)ea
stbrown
0.49
(0.36–
0.62
)ea
stbrown;0.31
(0.24–
0.40
)westbrown
0.51
(0.29–
0.76
)ea
stbrown;0.33
(0.20–
0.49
)west
brown
ABC+polar
NA
NA
NA
0.23
(0.11–
0.50
)0.15
2(0.131
–0.17
7)0.16
7(0.132
–0.21
4)Ancien
t+modern
NA
NA
NA
0.17
(0.11–
0.32
)0.13
4(0.122
–0.14
9)0.13
8(0.122
–0.16
2)Modern
NA
NA
NA
68.6k(5.5–16
6.0k
)43
.5k(29.8–
59.0k)
46.7k(24.0–
71.2k)
Method
TREE
-PUZZ
LE:molecu
lar
clock
onco
ding
regions,onedee
pfossilcalib
rationpoint
BEA
ST:strict
clock,GTR
+Γ4
,threedee
pfossil
calib
rationpoints
BEA
ST:relaxe
dunco
rrelated
log-
norm
alclock,GTR
+I+
Γ4,twodee
pfossil
calib
rationpoints
BEA
ST:relaxe
dunco
rrelated
log-
norm
alclock,GTR
+I+Γ4
,nodee
pfossil
calib
rationpoints
BEA
ST‡:relaxe
dunco
rrelated
log-
norm
alclock,GTR
+I+Γ4
,nodee
pfossil
calib
rationpoints
BEA
ST:relaxe
dunco
rrelated
log-
norm
alclock,GTR
+I+Γ4
,nodee
pfossil
calib
rationpoints
Other
inform
ation
NA
SpeciationYule
process,
MCMCch
ainlength
=30
,000
,000
,logev
ery
1000
,Tracer
burn-in
5,00
0,00
0states
SpeciationYule
process,
MCMCch
ainlength
=10
,000
,000
,logev
ery
1000
,burn-in10
,000
states
SpeciationYule
process,
MCMCch
ainlength
=50
,000
,000
,logev
ery
1000
,Tracerburn-in
5,00
0,00
0states,a
llES
S>21
0,samplin
g50
,001
tree
s,Tree
Annotatorburn-in
1000
tree
s
SpeciationYule
process,
MCMCch
ainlength
=50
,000
,000
,logev
ery
1000
,Tracerburn-in
5,00
0,00
0states,a
llES
S>24
0,samplin
g50
,001
tree
s,Tree
Annotatorburn-
in10
00tree
s
SpeciationYule
process,
MCMCch
ainlength
=80
,000
,000
,logev
ery
1000
,Tracerburn-in
8,00
0,00
0states,a
llES
S>23
0,samplin
g80
,001
tree
s,Tree
Annotatorburn-
in10
00tree
s
*Tim
ein
Mya
(million
yearsag
o)is
indicated
forclad
esunless
labeled
otherwise.
Mea
nan
d95
%highestposteriorden
sity
(HPD
;in
paren
theses)va
lues
areshown.NA,notap
plicab
le;GTR
,Gen
eral
Time
Rev
ersible;ES
S,EffectiveSa
mple
Size
.†NC_0
0342
7,“ea
stbrownbea
rclad
e”;EU
_497
665,
“westbrownbea
rclad
e”(1).
‡Usingthesameparam
etersin
BEA
STbuttheHaseg
awa-Kishino-Yan
o(H
KY)model
instea
doftheGTR
+Iresulted
insimila
rtimeestimates
(althoughallES
S>
1100
).
1.BonC,et
al.(200
8)Decipheringtheco
mplete
mitoch
ondrial
gen
omean
dphylogen
yoftheex
tinct
cave
bea
rin
thePa
leolithic
paintedcave
ofChau
vet.ProcNatlAcadSciUSA
105:17
447–
1745
2.2.
Krause
J,et
al.(200
8)Mitoch
ondrial
gen
omes
reve
alan
explosive
radiationofex
tinct
andex
tantbea
rsnea
rtheMiocene-Plioceneboundary.
BMCEv
olBiol8:22
0.3.
YuL,
LiY-W
,Ryd
erOA,Zh
angY(200
7)Analysisofco
mplete
mitoch
ondrial
gen
omesequen
cesincrea
sesphylogen
etic
resolutionofbea
rs(U
rsidae
),amam
malianfamily
that
experiencedrapid
speciation.BMCEv
olBiol7:19
8–20
9.
Lindqvist et al. www.pnas.org/cgi/content/short/0914266107 8 of 8