118
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020 CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT (TIME : 10:30 AM) NOTE : Chronology is based on the date of initial filing. NOTE :- “ REQUEST FOR “NOT TO DELETE A MATTER” AND ALL CIRCULATIONS ( IF THE MATTERS ARE NOT ON BOARD FOR THE DAY ) NEED NOT BE MENTIONED BEFORE THE BENCH. SUCH REQUEST BE HANDED OVER TO THE CONCERNED COURT MASTERS IN ADVANCE BEFORE 10.30 A.M. REGULAR HEARING SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate Indirect Taxes Matters - Sales Tax Act (Central & various States) 101 C.A. No. 7154-7155/2010 XI-A THE NILAMBUR RUBBER CO. LTD. M. P. VINOD Versus STATE OF KERALA NISHE RAJEN SHONKER 102 C.A. No. 108/2013 III-A M/S.ASHOKA METAL DECOR PVT.LTD. YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-1] Versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX,LUCKNOW AND ANR. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1], [R-2] NEW DELHI 29-01-2020 17:55:53 ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    8

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.NOTE:-“ REQUEST FOR “NOT TO DELETE A MATTER” AND ALL CIRCULATIONS ( IF THE MATTERS ARE NOT ON BOARDFOR THE DAY ) NEED NOT BE MENTIONED BEFORE THE BENCH. SUCH REQUEST BE HANDED OVER TO THECONCERNED COURT MASTERS IN ADVANCE BEFORE 10.30 A.M.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Indirect Taxes Matters - Sales Tax Act (Central & various States)

101 C.A. No.7154-7155/2010XI-A

THE NILAMBUR RUBBER CO. LTD. M. P. VINOD

VersusSTATE OF KERALA NISHE RAJEN SHONKER

102 C.A. No. 108/2013III-A

M/S.ASHOKA METAL DECOR PVT.LTD. YASH PAL DHINGRA[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX,LUCKNOW ANDANR.

BHAKTI VARDHANSINGH[R-1], [R-2]

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:55:53

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 2: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Election Matters - Appeals u/s 116 A of Representation of People Act, 1951.

103 C.A. No. 4533/2018IV-A

G. MANJUNATHA HETU ARORA SETHI[P-1]

VersusN. MUNIANJAPPA AND ORS. MANISH KUMAR

GUPTA[R-10], [R-13], NULI &NULI[R-1], [R-4], [R-8], [R-9],[R-12], [R-20], [R-21],SUBHRO SANYAL[R-14], T. R.B. SIVAKUMAR[R-15],a BALAJI SRINIVASAN[R-17]

IA No. 63058/2018 - APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONSIA No. 122406/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 122378/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESIA No. 122404/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:56:02

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 3: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Indirect Taxes Matters - Sales Tax Act (Central & various States)

104 C.A. No. 8033/2009XVI

STATE OF WEST BENGAL .AND ORS. MADHUMITABHATTACHARJEE[P-1]

VersusHINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED KARANJAWALA & CO.[R-1]

Indirect Taxes Matters - Appeals u/s 35 L of Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944.

105 C.A. No.5669-5670/2009XII

COMMR.OF CEN.EXC-I,CHENNAI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S DOLLAR CO.P.LTD. THROUGH M.D RAJESH KUMAR-I[R-1]

Indirect Taxes Matters - Appeals u/s 130 E of Customs Act, 1962

106 C.A. No.6240-6241/2009IX

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT),MUMBAI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S KAINYA AND ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD. THR. ITS.G.M. AND ANR.

BALRAJ DEWAN

Indirect Taxes Matters - Others

107 C.A. No.9706-9708/2010XII

ITC LTD. RAJAN NARAIN

VersusNORASIA CONTAINER LINES LTD. . AND ORS. M. T. GEORGE, R.

NEDUMARAN, ANILKATIYAR

107.1

ConnectedC.A. No.9709-9711/2010XII

ITC LTD. RAJAN NARAIN

Page 4: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT

VersusNORASIA CONTAINER LINES LTD.& ORS.ETC. M. T. GEORGE, S. RAVI

SHANKAR, B. KRISHNAPRASAD

Indirect Taxes Matters - Appeals u/s 35 L of Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944.

108 C.A. No.4008-4009/2009IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRALEXCISE AND SERVICE TAX

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. MAGNUS SOCIETY M. P. DEVANATHIA No. 7/2009 - PERMISSION TO FILEANNEXURESIA No. 5/2009 - STAY APPLICATION

Election Matters - Elections relating to Municipal Councils

109 C.A. No. 14925/2017III

MAKARAND ALIAS NANDU M. Y. DESHMUKH

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO

KATNESHWARKARDILIP ANNASAHEBTAUR[INT], AMOLNIRMALKUMARSURYAWANSHI[INT]

109.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 19834/2017III

NITIN M. Y. DESHMUKH

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ORS. SUDHANSHU S.

CHOUDHARI, [R-3][PR]

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:56:08

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 5: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Indirect Taxes Matters - Service Tax

110 C.A. No. 7501/2009IV-A

M/S CITY MALL DEVELOPERS (P.) LTD. KANCHAN KAUR DHODI

VersusUNION OF INDIA GOVT. OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

110.1 ConnectedC.A. No. 7139/2012XI-A

CITY CENTRE VIJAY KUMAR

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS.

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:56:14

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 6: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

FOR JUDGEMENT

1501 SLP(C) No. 12230/2016XVI

URMILA DEVI AND ORS. NEERAJ SHEKHAR

VersusBRANCH MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCECOMPANY LTD. . AND ANR.

PARMANAND GAUR

HEARD BY HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ,HON'BLE B.R. GAVAI AND HON'BLE SURYAKANT, JJ. ]IA No. 109118/2019 - DELETING THE NAME OFPETITIONER/RESPONDENT

1502 SLP(C) No. 12449/2018IX

CHOWGULE AND COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED PAREKH & CO.

VersusGOA FOUNDATION AND ORS. PRASHANT

BHUSHAN[CAVEAT],SHISHIR DESHPANDE[R-2],[R-3], ANIL KATIYAR[R-4],[R-5], [R-6], JAYANTMOHAN[R-7]AMAN VARMA[INT]

{Mention Memo}[ HEARD BY HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HON'BLE B.R. GAVAI AND HON'BLE SURYAKANT, JJ. ]IA No. 125770/2018 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTIONIA No. 93645/2018 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTIONIA No. 172244/2018 - INTERVENTIONAPPLICATIONIA No. 125763/2018 - INTERVENTIONAPPLICATIONIA No. 71318/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

1502.1

ConnectedSLP(C) No.12328-12330/2018IX

V.M. SALGAOCAR AND BROTHER PRIVATE LIMITED YASHRAJ SINGH DEORA

Versus

Page 7: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT

THE STATE OF GOA AND ORS. PRASHANTBHUSHAN[CAVEAT],SHISHIR DESHPANDE[R-2],[R-3], ANIL KATIYAR[R-4],[R-5]

{Mention Memo}FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA70802/2018IA No. 70802/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

1502.2

ConnectedDiary No. 17815-2018IX

AGARWAL MINERALS (GOA) PRIVATE LIMITED YASHRAJ SINGH DEORA

VersusTHE STATE OF GOA AND ORS. PRASHANT

BHUSHAN[CAVEAT],SHISHIR DESHPANDE[R-1],[R-2], [R-3], ANILKATIYAR[R-4], [R-4], [R-4],[R-5], [R-5], [R-5], PAREKH &CO.[R-18]

{Mention Memo}FOR PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION(SLP/TP/WP/..) ON IA 69949/2018FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA71228/2018IA No. 71228/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESIA No. 69949/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEPETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..)

1502.3

ConnectedSLP(C) No.25711-25713/2018IX

V.M. SALGAOCAR SALES INTERNATIONAL AND ANR. YASHRAJ SINGH DEORA

VersusTHE STATE OF GOA AND ORS. PRASHANT

BHUSHAN[CAVEAT], PRATAPVENUGOPAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

{Mention Memo}IA No. 162492/2018 - DELETING THE NAME OFPETITIONER/RESPONDENTIA No. 94061/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTIA No. 94068/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESIA No. 94063/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILELENGTHY LIST OF DATES

1502.4

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 24831/2018IX

M/S MINESCAPE MINERALS PVT.LTD JAYANT MOHAN

VersusTHE GOA FOUNDATION AND ORS. PRATAP VENUGOPAL[R-2],

[R-3], [R-4], ANILKATIYAR[R-5], PAREKH &CO.[R-17]

{Mention Memo}

Page 8: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.121258/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.121259/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

1502.5

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 24830/2018IX

M/S MINESCAPE AND KADAR ORES PVT LTD JAYANT MOHAN

VersusTHE GOA FOUNDATION AND ORS. PRATAP VENUGOPAL[R-2],

[R-3], [R-4], ANILKATIYAR[R-5], PAREKH &CO.[R-17]

{Mention Memo}FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.121256/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.121257/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

1502.6

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 22035/2019IV-A

M HABEEB (DECEASED) THROUGH LR RAJ KISHORCHOUDHARY[P-1.1]

VersusTHE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF KARNATAKAAND ORS.{Mention Memo}FOR ADMISSION

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:55:24

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 9: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

FOR ORDER

1503 C.A. No. 9883/2016III

SHEETAL GANESH KULKARNI RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI

VersusEDUCATION OFFICER AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO

KATNESHWARKAR, J S WADAND CO

{Mention Memo}[ FOR ORDERS ONLY IN I.A.NO.180711/2019 INC.A.NO.9882/2016 IS TO BE LISTED ]

1503.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 9882/2016III

JNANA PRABODHINI RAJIV SHANKAR DVIVEDI

VersusEDUCATION OFFICER (SECONDARY) . AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO

KATNESHWARKAR, J S WADAND CO, GURMEET SINGHMAKKER

{Mention Memo}[ HEARD BY HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HON'BLE B.R. GAVAI AND HON'BLE SURYAKANT, JJ. ][ FOR ORDERS ONLY INI.A.NO.180711/2019 IN C.A.NO.9882/2016 ISTO BE LISTED ] FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTIONON IA 180711/2019IA No. 180711/2019 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:55:35

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 10: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

FOR JUDGEMENT

1504 SLP(C) No. 23644/2016XI-A

STATE OF ODISHA AND ORS. SHIBASHISH MISRA[P-1]

VersusM/S. JINDAL STEEL AND POWER LTD. . AND ORS. PREM PRAKASH[R-1], [R-2],

GURMEET SINGHMAKKER[R-3]KEDAR NATHTRIPATHY[IMPL]SANJAY KAPUR[INT],PAREKH & CO.[INT]

[HEARD BY : HON. THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON.B.R. GAVAI AND HON. SURYA KANT, JJ.]

1505 SLP(C) No. 36253/2016XI

CHAIRMAN/MANAGING DIRECTOR, U.P. POWERCORPORATION LTD. AND ORS.

PRADEEP MISRA

VersusRAM GOPAL FARRUKH RASHEEDHEARD BY HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HON'BLE B.R. GAVAI AND HON'BLE SURYAKANT, JJ.

1505.1

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 2014/2017II

SANJAY AGARWAL AND ORS. PRADEEP MISRA

VersusRAM GOPAL

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:55:42

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 11: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 2

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

NOTE:-[ THIS BENCH WILL SIT UPTO 12.55 P.M. ]

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Arbitration Matters - SLPs challenging Arbitration Matters

101 C.A. No. 2402/2019XVI

VIDYA DROLIA AND ORS. SOUMYA DUTTA[P-1]

VersusDURGA TRADING CORPORATION T. R. B. SIVAKUMAR[R-1]PART-HEARD BY HON'BLE N.V. RAMANA,HON'BLE SANJIV KHANNA AND HON'BLEKRISHNA MURARI, JJ. [ TO GO BEFORE THREEHON'BLE JUDGES ]

101.1

ConnectedSLP(C) No.5605-5606/2019XVI

LINDSAY INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. BIJOY KUMAR JAIN

VersusIFGL REFRACTORIES LIMITED TARUNA SINGH

GOHIL[CAVEAT]FORFOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 33156/2019FOR PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OFDATES ON IA 33158/2019IA No. 33156/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTIA No. 33158/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILELENGTHY LIST OF DATES

101.2

ConnectedDiary No. 40679-2019XVII

CREATIVE INFOCITY LTD AJAY KUMAR

VersusGUJARAT INFORMATICS LTD DHEERAJ NAIR[R-1]IAFOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA175117/2019FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THEIMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 175118/2019

Page 12: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 2

FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA175120/2019IA No. 175117/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN FILINGIA No. 175118/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENTIA No. 175120/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:26:59

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 13: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 2

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Three Judges Bench Matter - Three Judges Bench Matter

102 SLP(C) No.19641-19642/2017XIV

NATIONAL BUILDINGS CONSTRUCTIONSCORPORATIONS LTD

NIKILESH RAMACHANDRAN

VersusTHE DIRECTOR GENERAL (MAP) AND ANR. MUKESH KUMAR

MARORIA[R-1], [R-2][ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:27:09

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 14: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 2

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Criminal Matters - Criminal matters in which sentence awarded is up to five years

103 Crl.A. No. 37-38/2010II-C

BASAVARAJ YALLAPPA KALASANNAVAR AND ORS. RAMESHWAR PRASADGOYAL[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:27:25

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 15: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 2

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Arbitration Matters - SLPs challenging Arbitration Matters

104 C.A. No. 5853/2011IX

THOMAS COOK (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

VersusM/S BEACH ARK HOTELS PVT.LTD. . AND ANR.

104.1 ConnectedC.A. No. 5854/2011IX

BEACH ARK HOTELS LTD. M. J. PAUL

VersusTHOMAS COOK (INDIA) LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

Criminal Matters - Criminal matters in which sentence awarded is up to five years

105 Crl.A. No. 901/2011II-A

RAM NANDAN PANDEY T. MAHIPAL

VersusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND RATAN KUMAR CHOUDHURI

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:27:50

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 16: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 2

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Arbitration Matters - SLPs challenging Arbitration Matters

106 C.A. No.6531-6532/2012XII-A

M/S.PIONEER BUILDERS Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO

VersusSTATE OF A.P. REP.BY DIST.COLL.. AND ORS. MAHFOOZ AHSAN

NAZKI[R-1]

106.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 1005/2000XII-A

M/S PIONEER BUILDERS ENGINEERS ANDCONTRACTORS (REGD.) REP. BY ITS MANAGINGPARTNER P. PRATHAP REDD

Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO

VersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP. BY THEDISTRICT COLLECTOR KURNOOL AND ORS.

C. K. SUCHARITA

FOR ON IA 78887/2008(application for revival) inCivil Appeal 1005 of 2000 (since the matter isrecalled)(As per court's order dated 15.05.2009 theapplication for revival is to be listed along withCivil Appeal 6531-6532 of 2012 )

106.2

ConnectedC.A. No. 1006/2000XII-A

M/S PIONEER BUILDERS ENGINEERS ANDCONTRACTORS (REGD.) REP. BY ITS MANAGINGPARTNER P. PRATHAP REDD

Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO

VersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP. BY THEDISTRICT COLLECTOR KURNOOL AND ORS.

C. K. SUCHARITA

FOR ON IA 81338/2008 (application for revival) inCivil Appeal 1006 of 2000 (since the matter isrecalled)(as per court's order dated 15.05.2009 theapplication for revival is to be listed along withCivil Appeal No. 6531-6532 of 2012)

106.3

ConnectedC.A. No.6533-6534/2012XII-A

M/S.PIONEER BUILDERS Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO

Versus

Page 17: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 2

STATE OF A.P. REP.BY DIST.COLL.KURN.&ORS C. K. SUCHARITA, GUNTURPRABHAKAR

Criminal Matters - Others

107 Crl.A. No.1605-1607/2011II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HOMEDEPARTMENT S.H.O.

RAHUL KAUSHIK[P-1]

VersusJASPAL SINGH ARORA . AND ORS. ANAND VARMA[R-1], SHIVAJI

M. JADHAV[R-2], [R-3]

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:28:18

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 18: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 2

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Matters Relating To Judiciary - Matters pertaining to service conditions , etc., ofindividual Judicial Officer and other matters not specified above

108 C.A. No. 6599/2010XII-A

C.S.S.D.INDIRA PRIYA DARSHINI M. VIJAYA BHASKAR[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANR. G. N. REDDY[R-1], T. V.

RATNAM[R-2][PR]

Letter Petition & Pil Matters - SLPs filed against judgments / orders passed by the HighCourts in Writ Petitions filed as PIL

109 C.A. No.3791-3793/2011XII-A

GOVERNMENT OF TELANGANA AND ORS. S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR,GUNTUR PRABHAKAR,VENKAT PALWAI LAWASSOCIATES[P-1][GR], G. N.REDDY[P-2], [P-2]

VersusRAO V.B.J.CHELIKANI & ORS. ETC. MCLM & CO.[CAVEAT],

TAPESH KUMAR SINGH[R-1],T. V. RATNAM, SHUVODEEPROY[R-1], S.THANANJAYAN[R-1], RANJANMUKHERJEE[R-1], RAJEEVSHARMA, R.a NEDUMARAN, N.RAJARAMAN[R-1], M. SHOEBALAM[R-1], K. V.VIJAYAKUMAR[R-1], K.ENATOLI SEMA[R-1], GOPALSINGH[R-1][GR], G.INDIRA[R-1], DEVASHISHa BHARUKA[R-1], C. K.SUCHARITA[R-1], C. K.SASI[R-1], BIJOY KUMARJAIN, B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1], ARPUTHAMARUNA AND CO[R-1][GR],AMIT PAWAND.a ABHINAV RAO[IMPL][PR]

Page 19: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 2

IA No.61480/2017-impleading party filed by Mr.D. Mahesh Babu, Adv.Mr. Tapesh Kumar Singh,Adv. has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of State ofJharkhand.Mr. C.K. Sasi, Advocate has filed vakalatnama onbehalf of State of Kerala. Mr. K.V. Vijayakumar,Advocate has filed memo of appearance on behalfofState of Tamil Nadu. Mr. K. Enatoli Sema,Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of Stateof Nagaland(Respondent). Mr. Ranjan Mukherjee,Advocatehas filed vakalatnama on behalf of JointSecretary, Law Department, State of Meghalaya,Ms. Sharmila Upadhyay, Advocate has filedvakalatnama onbehalf of LR-cum-Spl Secretary to Govt. LawDepartment, Odisha, Bhubaneswar. Mr. GopalSingh, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalfof State ofTripura. Mr. M. Shoeb Alam, Advocate has filedMemo of Appearance on behalf of State of Jammuand Kashmir. and IA No.123863/2017-EXTENSION OFTIME.Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Advocate has filedVakalatnama/Appearance on behalf of ResidentCommissioner UT Admin of Lakshadweep. Mr.Mishra Saurabh,Advocate has filed Vakalatnama/Appearance onbehalf of State of Madhya Pradesh. Mr. V.G.Pragasam, Advocate has filedVakalatnama/Appearance on behalfof Union Territory of Puducherry. Mr.Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, Adv has filedVakalatnama with memo of appearance and shortaffidavit on behalf of Stateof Chhattisgarh. and IA No.3666/2018-XTRAMr.Shuvodeep Roy, Standing counsel has filedVakalatnama/ Appearance on behalf of State ofAssam alongwithAffidavit alongwith application for permission tofile compliance affidavit and for condonation ofdelay in filing the same – by Respondent State ofAssam i.e. I.A. No. 3666 of 2018.Affidavit onbehalf of Respondent i.e. State of Kerala filed byMr.C.K.Sasi, AdvocateMs. Rachana Srivastava,Advocatefiled Vakalatnama/ appearance b/o State ofMeghalayaIA No. 16/2016 - APPLICATION FORSUBSTITUTIONIA No. 23802/2019 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTIONIA No. 123863/2017 - EXTENSION OF TIMEIA No. 93373/2018 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 61480/2017 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

109.1

ConnectedC.A. No.3794-3796/2011XII-A

M/S INDIRA LEGISLATORS MUTUALLY AIDEDCOOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED

C. K. SUCHARITA

Versus

Page 20: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 2

DR. RAO V.B.J. CHELIKANI AND ORS. MCLM & CO.[CAVEAT], T. V.RATNAM, S. THANANJAYAN,RAJEEV SHARMA, R.NEDUMARAN, BIJOY KUMARJAIN, AMIT PAWAN

FORFOR MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER ON IA10/2015FOR MODIFICATION OF COURT ORDER ON IA16/2016IA No. 16/2016 - MODIFICATION OF COURTORDERIA No. 10/2015 - MODIFICATION OF COURTORDER

109.2

ConnectedC.A. No.3797-3799/2011XII-A

M/S JAWAHARLAL NEHRU JOURNALISTS M.COOP C. K. SUCHARITA

VersusRAO V B J CHELIKANI . AND ORS. MCLM & CO.[CAVEAT], T. V.

RATNAM, S. THANANJAYAN,RAJEEV SHARMA, R.NEDUMARAN, N.RAJARAMAN, BIJOY KUMARJAIN, AMIT PAWAN

FORFOR INTERVENTION APPLICATION ON IA 4/2013IA No. 4/2013 - INTERVENTION APPLICATION

109.3

ConnectedC.A. No.3800-3802/2011XII-A

KOH-EI-MUT.AIDED COOP.HNG.STY.LTD. AND ORS. R. NEDUMARAN

VersusRAO, V B J CHELIKANI . AND ORS. MCLM & CO.[CAVEAT], T. V.

RATNAM, RAJEEV SHARMA,PROMILA, C. K. SUCHARITA,BIJOY KUMAR JAIN, AMITPAWAN

109.4

ConnectedC.A. No. 3810/2011XII-A

M/S. CAMPAIGN FOR HOUSING TENURAL RIGHTS(CHATRI) REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY SRI S.JEEVAN KUMAR

PRASHANT BHUSHAN

VersusTHE GOVT. OF TELANGANA. REPRESENTED BY ITSSPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT ANDORS.

AMIT PAWAN, T. V. RATNAM,S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR,RAJEEV SHARMA, R.NEDUMARAN, PROMILA

109.5

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 19838/2010XII-A

KESHAV RAO JADHAV MCLM & CO., [CAVEAT]

VersusGOVT. OF A. P. AND ORS. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR,

[R-2][GR], [R-3][GR],ABINASH KUMAR MISHRA,[R-11], T. V. RATNAM[R-7], R.NEDUMARAN, [R-8],PROMILA, [R-5], [R-9],RAJEEV SHARMA,

Page 21: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 2

a [R-10]S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR[I-1][IMPL][GR]

IA No. 2/2011 - PERMISSION TO FILEANNEXURES

109.6

ConnectedC.A. No. 3803/2011XII-A

M/S. INDIAN REVENUE SERVICE OFFICERSHOUSING SOCIETY

RAJEEV SHARMA

VersusGOVERNMENT OF TELANGANA REPRESENTED BYITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT ANDORS.

BIJOY KUMAR JAIN, T. V.RATNAM, S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR, R. NEDUMARAN, C.K. SUCHARITA, AMIT PAWAN

109.7

ConnectedC.A. No.3804-3806/2011XII-A

M/S UDAY CIVIL SER.COOP.MUT.AID.HS.BD.ST

VersusRAO V.B.J CHELIKANI . AND ORS. MCLM & CO.[CAVEAT], T. V.

RATNAM, S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR, R. NEDUMARAN, C.K. SUCHARITA, BIJOYKUMAR JAIN, AMIT PAWAN

FOR APPLICATION FOR TRANSPOSITION ON IA7/2013IA No. 7/2013 - APPLICATION FORTRANSPOSITION

109.8

ConnectedC.A. No.3807-3809/2011XII-A

K.LAXMI REDDY AND ORS.

VersusRAO V.B.J.CHELIKANI . AND ORS. MCLM & CO.[CAVEAT], T. V.

RATNAM, RAJEEV SHARMA,R. NEDUMARAN, C. K.SUCHARITA, BIJOY KUMARJAIN, AMIT PAWAN

109.9

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 32890/2018XII-A

K. NAGI REDDY RAJAT SINGH[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AND ORS. VENKAT PALWAI LAW

ASSOCIATES[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4], D. BHARATHIREDDY[R-5]

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:28:33

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 22: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 2

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Criminal Matters - Matters relating to sexual harassment, kidnapping & abduction

110 Crl.A. No. 963/2012(SCLSC) II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH MISHRA SAURABH

VersusHARISINGH M. SARADA

NOTE:-[ HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA WILL TAKE CHAMBER MATTERS AT 2.00 P.M. ].[ HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI WILL TAKE CHAMBER MATTERS AT 2.00 P.M. IN COURT NO.10 ]

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:28:39

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 23: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 3

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

NOTE:-[ THIS BENCH WILL SIT UPTO 12.55 P.M. AND RE-ASSEMBLE AT 2.00 P.M. ]

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Company Law, Mrtp, Trai, Sebi, Idrai & Rbi - Appeals u/s 15 Z of Securities and ExchangeBoard of India Act, 1992.

101 C.A. No. 4964/2008XVII

VOCATION INVESTMENT NEERAJ SHEKHAR, [P-2],[P-3]

VersusADITYA BIRLA NUVO LTD. . AND ANR. S. S. SHROFF, BHARGAVA V.

DESAI[R-2]

101.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 4205/2008XVII

AIDEK TOURISM SERVICES PVT. LTD. NEERAJ SHEKHAR

VersusADITYA BIRLA NUVO LTD. . AND ORS. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN, S. S.

SHROFF, BHARGAVA V.DESAI

101.2

ConnectedC.A. No. 7218/2009XVII

M/S.AIDEK TOURISM SERVICES P. LTD. AND ORS.AND ANR.

NEERAJ SHEKHAR

VersusSECURITIES AND EXCH.BD.OF INDIA AND ORS. S. S. SHROFF, BHARGAVA V.

DESAI, K J JOHN ANDCO[CAVEAT]

101.3

ConnectedC.A. No. 6669/2009XVII

AIDEK TOURISM SERVICE PVT. LTD. NEERAJ SHEKHAR[P-1]

VersusSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ANDORS.

K J JOHN AND CO[CAVEAT],BHARGAVA V. DESAI[R-1], S.S. SHROFF[R-2], SENTHILJAGADEESAN[R-3], [R-5], E.C. AGRAWALA[R-6]

Criminal Matters - Matters relating to Bank scams, cheating, forgery etc.

Page 24: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 3

102 Crl.A. No.1250-1252/2009II

T. RAGHU ETC. JYOTI MENDIRATTA

VersusD.B.RAVINDRANATH AND ANR. ANNAM D. N. RAO, D.

MAHESH BABUAs per R.P. dated 29.11.2018, matter was to belisted in the 3rd week of January, 2019, henceplease update next date accordingly.

Criminal Matters - Matters filed by State against Acquittal

103 Crl.A. No. 734-739/2011II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[P-1]

VersusSURESH KUMAR JADIA AND ORS. T. MAHIPAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],

AFTAB ALI KHAN[R-4]

Company Law, Mrtp, Trai, Sebi, Idrai & Rbi - Appeals under Section 55 of the MRTP Act,1969

104 C.A. No.7380-7381/2008XVII

EMERSON NETWORK POWER INDIA PRIVATE LTD.(FORMERLY KNOWN AS TATA LIEBERT LTD.)

ANIL SHRIVASTAV

VersusTHE DIRECTOR AND ANR. SHALLY BHASIN

Company Law, Mrtp, Trai, Sebi, Idrai & Rbi - Matters relating to winding up

105 C.A. No. 7104/2009XIV-A

MAGMA LEASING LTD. THROUGH ITS CONSTITUTEDATTORNEY MR. VIJAY JOSHI

SUSMITA LAL

VersusM/S.HCL INFOSYSTEMS LTD. THROUGH ITSMANAGING DIRECTOR

ARPUTHAM ARUNA AND CO

Company Law, Mrtp, Trai, Sebi, Idrai & Rbi - Matters pertaining to TRAI / SEBI / IDRAIand RBI including Appeals U/S 18 of TRAI Act, Indian Electricity Act, 1910 and 2003,Electricity Supply Act, 1948 and Electricity Reforms Commission Act, 1998 - Matters

pertaining to TRAI / SEBI / IDRAI and RBI including Appeals U/S 18 of TRAI Act

106 C.A. No.4104-4107/2008XVII

TIRUMALA BALAJI ALLOYS PVT.LTD. . AND ORS. SHIBASHISH MISRA

VersusM/S JINDAL STEEL AND ORS. T. MAHIPAL, RASHMI SINGH,

PRAMOD DAYAL, KHAITAN &CO.

107 C.A. No.3607-3610/2008XVII

M/S JINDAL STEEL AND POWER LTD. KHAITAN & CO.

VersusCHATTISGARH STATE ELECT. REG. COMMN.. ANDORS.

RAM SWARUP SHARMA,PRAMOD DAYAL

Page 25: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 3

107.1

ConnectedC.A. No.4968-4969/2010XVII

CHHATISGARH STATE POWER DISTRN.CO.LTD. MCLM & CO.[P-1]

VersusARYAN COAL BENEFICATIONS P.LTD. AND ANR. PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1], M. R.

SHAMSHAD[R-1]

107.2

ConnectedC.A. No.5683-5685/2010XVII

CHHATISGARH STATE POWER DISTRN.CO.LTD. MCLM & CO.[P-1]

VersusSALASAR STEEL AND POWER LTD. AND ORS ANDORS.

SHARMILA UPADHYAY[R-1],PRAMOD DAYAL[R-2],DEVASHISH BHARUKA[R-4]

107.3

ConnectedC.A. No. 3134/2011XVII

M/S. JAYASWAL NECO INDUSTRIES LTD. DEVASHISH BHARUKA

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE REGULATORY COMM. PRAMOD DAYAL, RAM

SWARUP SHARMAFOR ON IA 1/2011

107.4

ConnectedC.A. No.5934-5935/2016XVII

SALASAR STEEL AND POWER LTD. LAKSHMI RAMAN SINGH

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTIONCOMPANY LTD. . AND ANR.

RAM SWARUP SHARMA, C. K.RAI

FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ANNEXURES] ON IA3/2017IA No. 3/2017 - PERMISSION TO FILEANNEXURES

107.5

ConnectedC.A. No. 2873/2018XVII

CHHATTISHGARH STATE POWER DISTRICUTION CO.LTD

APOORV KURUP

VersusCHHATISGARH STATE ELECT. REGLT. COMMISSIONTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANR.

PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1]

FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA28721/2018FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 28723/2018IA No. 28723/2018 - EX-PARTE STAYIA No. 28721/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

107.6

ConnectedC.A. No. 22944/2017XVII

GODAWARI POWER AND ISPAT LIMITED HASAN MURTAZA

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTIONCOMPANY LTD. AND ANR.

APOORV KURUP[R-1],PRAMOD DAYAL[R-2]

107.7

ConnectedC.A. No.1598-1599/2018XVII

SALASAR STEEL AND POWER LTD. HASAN MURTAZA

Versus

Page 26: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 3

CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTIONCOMPANY LTD. AND ANR.

APOORV KURUP[R-1],PRAMOD DAYAL[R-2]

IAFOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 9918/2018IA No. 9918/2018 - EX-PARTE STAY

107.8

ConnectedC.A. No. 3038/2018XVII

SKS ISPAT AND POWER LTD RAJESH KUMAR

VersusCHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION CO.LTD AND ANR.

PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1]

IAFOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 23209/2018IA No. 23209/2018 - EX-PARTE STAY

107.9

ConnectedC.A. No.1841-1842/2018XVII

M/S API ISPAT AND POWERTECH (P) LTD HASAN MURTAZA

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTIONCOMPANY LTD AND ANR.IAFOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 16131/2018IA No. 16131/2018 - EX-PARTE STAY

107.10

ConnectedC.A. No. 3032/2018XVII

CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION CO.LTD.

APOORV KURUP

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION AND ANR.

PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1], HASANMURTAZA[R-2], [R-2]

IA No.22538/2018-EX-PARTE STAY and IANo.22536/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING APPEAL and IA No.22537/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS

107.11

ConnectedC.A. No. 3026/2018XVII

CHHATISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION CO.LTD.

APOORV KURUP

VersusCHHATISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION AND ANR.

PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1], HASANMURTAZA[R-2]

107.12

ConnectedC.A. No. 3031/2018XVII

CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION CO.LTD.

APOORV KURUP

VersusCHHATISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATROYCOMMISSION AND ANR.

PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1]

FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 27641/2018FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA27642/2018IA No. 27641/2018 - EX-PARTE STAYIA No. 27642/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

107.13

ConnectedC.A. No. 3028/2018XVII

CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION COLTD

APOORV KURUP

Page 27: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 3

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION AND ANR.

HASAN MURTAZA[R-2]

FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILINGAPPEAL ON IA 26902/2018FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS ON IA 26909/2018FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 26914/2018[ TO BE TAKEN UP ALONGWITH ITEM NO. 8 I.E.D.NO.2647/2018 ]IA No. 26914/2018 - EX-PARTE STAYIA No. 26909/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

107.14

ConnectedC.A. No. 3035/2018XVII

CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION COLTD

APOORV KURUP

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION AND ANR.

PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1], RAJKISHOR CHOUDHARY[R-2]

FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 28012/2018FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA28015/2018IA No. 28015/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESIA No. 28012/2018 - STAY APPLICATION

107.15

ConnectedC.A. No. 3034/2018XVII

CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION COLTD

APOORV KURUP

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION AND ANR.

PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1]

FOR PERMISSION TO PLACE ADDITIONAL FACTSAND GROUNDS ON IA 27697/2018FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 27700/2018IA No. 27700/2018 - EX-PARTE STAYIA No. 27697/2018 - PERMISSION TO PLACEADDITIONAL FACTS AND GROUNDS

107.16

ConnectedC.A. No. 3033/2018XVII

CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION CO.LTD.

APOORV KURUP

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION AND ORS.

PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1]

FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA28337/2018 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING ON IA 28340/2018 FOR PERMISSIONTO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTSON IA 28342/2018 FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA28345/2018[ TO BE TAKEN UP ALONGWITH ITEMNO. 8 I.E. D.NO.2647/2018 ]IA No. 28345/2018 - EX-PARTE STAYIA No. 28342/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

107.17

ConnectedC.A. No. 3023/2018XVII

CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION COLTD

APOORV KURUP

Versus

Page 28: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 3

CHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION AND ANR.

PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1], HASANMURTAZA[R-2]

FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILINGAPPEAL ON IA 28638/2018 FOR PERMISSION TOFILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS ON IA28640/2018 FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA28643/2018[ TO BE TAKEN UP ALONGWITH ITEMNO. 8 I.E. D.NO.2647/2018 ]IA No. 28643/2018 - EX-PARTE STAYIA No. 28640/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

107.18

ConnectedC.A. No. 3022/2018XVII

CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION CO.LTD.

APOORV KURUP

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION AND ANR.

PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1]

FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILINGAPPEAL ON IA 27999/2018FOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS AND GROUNDS] ON IA 28001/2018FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 28002/2018[ TO BE TAKEN UP ALONGWITH ITEM NO. 8 I.E.D.NO.2647/2018 ]IA No. 28002/2018 - EX-PARTE STAYIA No. 28001/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS AND GROUNDS

107.19

ConnectedC.A. No. 3029/2018XVII

CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION COLTD

APOORV KURUP

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION AND ANR.

PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1], HASANMURTAZA[R-2]

FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA28468/2018FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 28469/2018IA No. 28469/2018 - EX-PARTE STAYIA No. 28468/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

107.20

ConnectedC.A. No. 3027/2018XVII

CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION COLTD

APOORV KURUP

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION AND ANR.

PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1], HASANMURTAZA[R-2]

FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA28473/2018 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING ON IA 28474/2018 FOR PERMISSIONTO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTSON IA 28475/2018 FOR [AD-INTERIM EX-PARTESTAY] ON IA 28476/2018[ TO BE TAKEN UPALONGWITH ITEM NO. 8 I.E. D.NO.2647/2018 ]IA No. 28476/2018 - AD-INTERIM EX-PARTE STAYIA No. 28475/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

107.21

ConnectedC.A. No. 6114/2018XVII

CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION COLTD

APOORV KURUP

Page 29: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 3

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION AND ANR.

PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1], HASANMURTAZA[R-2]

FORFOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA63462/2018FOR EX-PARTE STAY ON IA 63463/2018IA No. 63463/2018 - EX-PARTE STAYIA No. 63462/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

107.22

ConnectedC.A. No. 6116/2018XVII

CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER DISTRIBUTION CO.LTD.

APOORV KURUP

VersusCHHATTISGARH STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORYCOMMISSION

PRAMOD DAYAL[R-1], HASANMURTAZA[R-2], [R-2]

FORFOR [PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALGROUNDS AND DOCUMENTS] ON IA 63272/2018IA No. 63272/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL GROUNDS AND DOCUMENTS

108 C.A. No. 4279/2008XVII

TATA STEEL LTD. . AND ANR. MANIK KARANJAWALA

VersusJHARKHAND STATE ELECT.REGU.COMMISSION FARRUKH RASHEED

109 C.A. No. 4733/2008XVII

POWERGRID CORP.OF INDIA LTD. PRAMOD DAYAL, [R-8]

VersusNORTH EASTERN ELECT.POWER CORP.LTD. ANDORS.

SHARMILA UPADHYAY, T. G.NARAYANAN NAIR[R-6],GOPAL SINGH[R-8]

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:30:27

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 30: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 3

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Company Law, Mrtp, Trai, Sebi, Idrai & Rbi - Appeals under Section 55 of the MRTP Act,1969

110 C.A. No. 2534/2008XVII

M/S. HEWLETT PACKARD(INDIA) P. V. DINESH

VersusMAHESH C. ADVANI JATIN ZAVERI

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:30:38

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 31: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 4

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

NOTE :- No request for adjournment will be granted in any of the matter(s) listed for hearing.NOTE:-[ THREE JUDGES BENCH MATTERS WILL BE TAKEN UP FIRST ][ THIS BENCH WILL SIT UPTO 12.55 P.M. AND RE-ASSEMBLE AT 2.00 P.M. ]

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Direct Taxes Matter - Other matters under Income Tax act, 1961

101 C.A. No.8733-8734/2018IV-A

ENGINEERING ANALYSIS CENTRE OF EXCELLENCEPRIVATE LIMITED

B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[ LIST AS FIRST ITEM SUBJECT TO PART-HEARD ,IF ANY ]

101.1

ConnectedC.A. No.8735-8736/2018IV-A

GE INDIA TECHNOLOGY CENTRE PRIVATE LIMITED B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.2

ConnectedC.A. No.8737-8941/2018IV-A

M/S. SONATA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. .ETC.ETC

ANIL KATIYAR

101.3

ConnectedC.A. No.8942-8947/2018IV-A

M/S SONATA SOFTWARE LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.4

ConnectedC.A. No.8950-8953/2018IV-A

HEWLETT PACKARD INDIA PVT. LTD. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

Versus

Page 32: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 4

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.5

ConnectedC.A. No.8948-8949/2018IV-A

HEWLETT PACKARD INDIA SOFTWARE OPERATIONSPVT. LTD.

SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.6

ConnectedC.A. No. 4419/2012IV-A

M/S. IBM INDIA LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.7

ConnectedC.A. No. 4420/2012IV-A

M/S. IBM INDIA LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.8

ConnectedC.A. No. 10114/2013IV-A

SASKEN COMMUNICATIONS TECH LIMITED KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.9

ConnectedC.A. No.10107-10108/2013IV-A

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT. LTD. KUNAL VERMA

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.10

ConnectedC.A. No.10109-10111/2013IV-A

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.LTD. RAMESHWAR PRASADGOYAL

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.11

ConnectedC.A. No. 10097/2013IV-A

TEJAS NETWORKS INDIA LTD KUNAL VERMA

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.12

ConnectedC.A. No.10112-10113/2013IV-A

MPHASIS BFL LTD. KUNAL VERMA

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.13

ConnectedC.A. No. 10106/2013IV-A

MPHASIS BFL LTD. KUNAL VERMA

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

Page 33: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 4

101.14

ConnectedC.A. No.8954-8955/2018IV-A

ALCATEL-LUCENT INDIA PVT. LTD. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.15

ConnectedC.A. No.10115-10117/2013IV-A

M/S. SUNRAY COMPUTERS PVT. LTD. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.16

ConnectedC.A. No. 8956/2018IV-A

M/S. EDS TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.17

ConnectedC.A. No.4623-4628/2014IV-A

SYNOPSYS INTERNATIONAL OLD LTD. RUSTOM B.HATHIKHANAWALA

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX BANGALOREAND ANR.

ANIL KATIYAR

101.18

ConnectedC.A. No. 8957/2018IV-A

SASKEN COMMUNICATIONS TECH LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.19

ConnectedC.A. No. 8990/2018XIV-A

CITRIX SYSTEMS ASIA PACIFIC PTY LTD. AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

VersusDIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONALTAXATION)

ANIL KATIYAR

101.20

ConnectedC.A. No. 10103/2013IV-A

TEJAS NETWORKS INDIA LTD. KUNAL VERMA

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.21

ConnectedC.A. No. 10104/2013IV-A

TEJAS NETWORKS INDIA LTD. KUNAL VERMA

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.22

ConnectedC.A. No.8974-8975/2018IV-A

M/S EDS TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.23

ConnectedC.A. No. 6376/2016XIV-A

DIR. OF INCOME TAX.(INT.T), NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

Page 34: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 4

VersusM/S. METAPATH SOFTWARE INTERNATIONAL LTD S. R. SETIA

101.24

ConnectedC.A. No.6382-6383/2016XIV-A

DIR.OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ERICSSON RADIO SYSTEMS A.B. KAMAL MOHAN

GUPTA[CAVEAT]

101.25

ConnectedC.A. No. 8966/2018IV-A

M/S RATIONAL SOFTWARE CORPORATION INDIA LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.26

ConnectedC.A. No. 8959/2018IV-A

M/S RATIONAL SOFTWARE CORPORATION INDIA LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.27

ConnectedC.A. No. 8973/2018IV-A

M/S RATIONAL SOFTWARE CORPORATION INDIA LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.28

ConnectedC.A. No. 8963/2018IV-A

M/S RATIONAL SOFTWARE CORPORATION INDIA LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONALTAXATION AND ANR.

ANIL KATIYAR

101.29

ConnectedC.A. No. 8962/2018IV-A

M/S RATIONAL SOFTWARE CORPORATION INDIA LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.30

ConnectedC.A. No. 8958/2018IV-A

M/S RATIONAL SOFTWARE CORPORATION INDIA LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.31

ConnectedC.A. No. 8965/2018IV-A

M/S RATIONAL SOFTWARE CORPORATION INDIA LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.32

ConnectedC.A. No. 8972/2018IV-A

M/S SONATA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LTD H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.33

ConnectedC.A. No. 8961/2018IV-A

M/S SONATA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

Page 35: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 4

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.34

ConnectedC.A. No. 8969/2018IV-A

M/S SONATA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.35

ConnectedC.A. No. 8960/2018IV-A

M/S SONATA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.36

ConnectedC.A. No. 8971/2018IV-A

M/S. SONATA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE DIRECTOR (COMMISSIONER) OF INCOME TAXAND ANR.

ANIL KATIYAR

101.37

ConnectedC.A. No. 8970/2018IV-A

M/S SONATA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.38

ConnectedC.A. No. 8964/2018IV-A

M/S SONATA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.39

ConnectedC.A. No. 8967/2018IV-A

M/S SONATA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.40

ConnectedC.A. No. 8968/2018IV-A

M/S SONATA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LTD. H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.41

ConnectedC.A. No. 4629/2014IV-A

ANSYS SOFTWARE PVT. LTD. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.42

ConnectedC.A. No. 4631/2014IV-A

ANSYS SOFTWARE PVT. LTD. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.43

ConnectedC.A. No. 4630/2014IV-A

ANSYS SOFTWARE PVT. LTD. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

Versus

Page 36: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 4

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.44

ConnectedC.A. No.6386-6387/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONALTAXATION) NEW DELHI

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusERICSSON A.B.,NEW DELHI KAMAL MOHAN

GUPTA[CAVEAT]

101.45

ConnectedC.A. No. 10105/2013IV-A

ADITYA BIRLA MINACS WORLDWIDE LTD KHAITAN & CO.

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.46

ConnectedC.A. No. 6377/2016XIV-A

C.I.T-XVI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusVIJAY GOPAL JINDAL PUJA SHARMA

101.47

ConnectedC.A. No. 7852/2012IV-A

M/S. ING VYSYA LIFE INSURANCE CO. (P) LTD.

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.48

ConnectedC.A. No.1416-1418/2013IV-A

M/S. SONATA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.49

ConnectedC.A. No. 1403/2013IV-A

M/S. SONATA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LIMITEDAND ANR.

H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO,AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.50

ConnectedC.A. No. 1405/2013IV-A

M/S. SONATA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.51

ConnectedC.A. No. 1410/2013IV-A

M/S. SONATA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.52

ConnectedC.A. No. 1421/2013IV-A

M/S. SONATA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.53

ConnectedC.A. No. 1409/2013IV-A

M/S. SONATA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

Versus

Page 37: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 4

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.54

ConnectedC.A. No. 1415/2013IV-A

M/S. SONATA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LIMITED ANIL KUMAR GAUTAM

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.55

ConnectedC.A. No. 1414/2013IV-A

M/S. SONATA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.56

ConnectedC.A. No. 1412/2013IV-A

M/S. SONATA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.57

ConnectedC.A. No. 1413/2013IV-A

M/S. SONATA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.58

ConnectedC.A. No. 1419/2013IV-A

M/S. SONATA INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.59

ConnectedC.A. No. 1411/2013IV-A

M/S. IBM INDIA LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.60

ConnectedC.A. No. 1420/2013IV-A

M/S. IBM INDIA LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.61

ConnectedC.A. No. 1404/2013IV-A

M/S IBM INDIA LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.62

ConnectedC.A. No. 1406/2013IV-A

M/S. IBM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.63

ConnectedC.A. No. 1408/2013IV-A

M/S. IBM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

Page 38: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 4

101.64

ConnectedC.A. No. 1407/2013IV-A

M/S. RATIONAL SOFTWARE CORPORATION INDIALIMITED

H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.65

ConnectedC.A. No. 2304/2013IV-A

TATA ELXSI LIMITED KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.66

ConnectedC.A. No. 2305/2013IV-A

TATA ELXSI LIMITED KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.67

ConnectedC.A. No. 2306/2013IV-A

TATA ELXSI LIMITED KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.68

ConnectedC.A. No.10098-10102/2013IV-A

M/S. LG SOFT INDIA PVT. LTD. V. BALACHANDRAN

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.69

ConnectedC.A. No. 6381/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF I.T. (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusCIT ALCATEL RAMESHWAR PRASAD

GOYAL[R-1]

101.70

ConnectedC.A. No.2307-2308/2013IV-A

HEWLETT PACKARD GLOBALSOFT PVT. LTD. SENTHIL JAGADEESAN

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.71

ConnectedC.A. No. 6380/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONALTAXATION) NEW DELHI

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNOKIA NETWORKS OY RAMESHWAR PRASAD

GOYAL

101.72

ConnectedC.A. No. 6388/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONALTAXATION)NEW DELHI

ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusNOKIA NETWORKS OY, SHEKHAR PRIT JHA

101.73

ConnectedC.A. No. 6385/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONALTAXATION) NEW DELHI

ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

Versus

Page 39: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 4

NOKIA NETWORKS OY RAMESHWAR PRASADGOYAL

101.74

ConnectedC.A. No. 6384/2016XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONALTAXATION),NEW DELHI

ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusNOKIA NETWORKS OY, RAMESHWAR PRASAD

GOYAL

101.75

ConnectedC.A. No.4666-4667/2013IV-A

M/S. IBM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusINCOME TAX OFFICER BANGALORE ANIL KATIYAR

101.76

ConnectedC.A. No. 6764/2013IV-A

M/S. IBM INDIA LIMITED H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.77

ConnectedC.A. No. 4634/2014IV-A

SYNOPSYS INTERNATIONAL LTD. KUNAL VERMA

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

101.78

ConnectedC.A. No. 8976/2018IV-A

M/S FLEXTRONICS TECHNOLOGIES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. RONY OOMMEN JOHN[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

101.79

ConnectedC.A. No.8977-8988/2018IV-A

IBM INDIA PVT LTD H. RAGHAVENDRA RAO

VersusI.T. OFFICER ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

101.80

ConnectedC.A. No. 31/2017XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S. HALLIBURTON EXPORT INC. SHEKHAR PRIT JHA[R-1]IA No. 173381/2019 - EARLY HEARINGAPPLICATION

101.81

ConnectedC.A. No.12276-12277/2016IV-A

SYNOPSYS INTERNATIONAL LTD. KUNAL VERMA

VersusTHE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) AND ORS.

ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2],[R-3]

101.82

ConnectedC.A. No. 10218/2016IV-A

SYNOPSYS INTERNATIONAL LTD. KUNAL VERMA

Versus

Page 40: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 4

THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) . AND ANR.

ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

101.83

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 37580/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusALCATEL LUCENT FRANCE USA INC.

101.84

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 28867/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONALTAXATION) 1

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ALCATEL LUCENT ITALIA SPA

101.85

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 28868/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONALTAXATION) 1

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. ALCATEL LUCENT FRANCE KISHORE KUNAL[R-1]

101.86

ConnectedC.A. No. 10673/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ALCATEL LUCENT FRANCE KISHORE KUNAL

101.87

ConnectedC.A. No. 8721/2018XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S M. TECH INDIA PVT. LTD.

101.88

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 29571/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONALTAXATION1

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ALCATEL LUCENT ITALIA SPA

101.89

ConnectedC.A. No. 10674/2016XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. ALCATEL LUCENT FRANCE KISHORE KUNAL

101.90

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 36782/2016XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusALACTEL LUCENT FRANCE

101.91

ConnectedC.A. No. 2425/2017XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusERICSSON A.B. RSM AND CO

101.92

ConnectedC.A. No. 3402/2017IV-A

ON MOBILE GLOBAL LTD KUNAL VERMA

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2]

Page 41: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 4

101.93

ConnectedC.A. No. 8718/2018XIV-A

DIRECTOR INCOME TAX I ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD KAVITA JHA[R-1]

101.94

ConnectedC.A. No. 8719/2018XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX 1 ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD. KAVITA JHA[R-1]FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING ONIA 73883/2017IA No. 73882/2017 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

101.95

ConnectedC.A. No. 9366/2017XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX I ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD KAVITA JHA[R-1]

101.96

ConnectedC.A. No. 10758/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusCOMPTEL OY KISHORE KUNAL[R-1]

101.97

ConnectedC.A. No. 8617/2017XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX I ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S. HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD. KAVITA JHA[R-1]

101.98

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 27872/2017IV-A

SYNOPSYS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED KUNAL VERMA

VersusTHE JOINT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) AND ANR.

101.99

ConnectedC.A. No. 9486/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusCOMPTEL OYJ KISHORE KUNAL[R-1]

101.100

ConnectedC.A. No. 20932/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONALTAXATION 2

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusZTE CORPORATION HARPREET SINGH

AJMANI[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.123259/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.123261/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING

101.101

ConnectedC.A. No. 8711/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONALTAXATION) 1

ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

Page 42: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 4

COMPTEL OYJ KISHORE KUNAL[R-1]

101.102

ConnectedC.A. No. 21832/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusZTE CORPORATION HARPREET SINGH

AJMANI[R-1]

101.103

ConnectedC.A. No. 18311/2017XIV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusZTE CORPORATION HARPREET SINGH

AJMANI[R-1]

101.104

ConnectedC.A. No. 19837/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusZTE CORPORATION HARPREET SINGH

AJMANI[R-1]

101.105

ConnectedC.A. No. 17532/2017XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONALTAXATION 2

ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusZTE CORPORATION HARPREET SINGH

AJMANI[R-1]

101.106

ConnectedC.A. No. 8713/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ASPECT SOFTWARE INC. BRAJ KISHORE MISHRA[R-1]IA No.119567/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.119568/2017-EXEMPTIONFROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

101.107

ConnectedC.A. No. 8712/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 NEW DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. ASPECT SOFTWARE INC. BRAJ KISHORE MISHRA[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.116868/2017-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.116870/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

101.108

ConnectedC.A. No. 8714/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONALTAXATION) I

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. ASPECT SOFTWARE INC. BRAJ KISHORE MISHRA[R-1]

101.109

ConnectedC.A. No. 8715/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. ASPECT SOFTWARE INC. BRAJ KISHORE MISHRA[R-1]

Page 43: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 4

101.110

ConnectedC.A. No. 8716/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S ASPECT SOFTWARE INC. BRAJ KISHORE MISHRA[R-1]

101.111

ConnectedC.A. No. 8722/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIOANALTAXATION) 2

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNET APP BV RUNAMONI BHUYAN[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.46713/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.46714/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OFTHE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

101.112

ConnectedC.A. No. 9414/2018XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATINAL TAXATION) 2

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNET APP BV RUNAMONI BHUYAN[R-1]

101.113

ConnectedC.A. No. 8724/2018XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 (CENTRAL)NEW DELHI

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusCOMPTEL OYJ KISHORE KUNAL[R-1]

101.114

ConnectedC.A. No. 8725/2018XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) I

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusCOMPTEL OYJ KISHORE KUNAL[R-1]

101.115

ConnectedC.A. No. 9551/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONALTAXATION 2

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNET APP B.V RUNAMONI BHUYANFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.120741/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

101.116

ConnectedC.A. No. 10844/2018XIV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION 2

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusNORTAL NETWORK INDIA INTERNATIONAL INC. HARPREET SINGH

AJMANI[CAVEAT]

101.117

ConnectedC.A. No. 11196/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONALTAXATION 3

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSHANGHAI ELECTRIC GROUP CO. LTD. HARPREET SINGH AJMANIFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.159318/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

101.118

ConnectedDiary No. 38336-2018XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONALTAXATION 3

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSHANGHAI ELECTRIC GROUP CO. LTD. THROUGHDIRECTOR

Page 44: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 4

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.159777/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

101.119

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 450/2019XIV

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX IV ANIL KATIYAR

VersusGE INDIA INDUSTRIAL PVT. LTD.

101.120

ConnectedDiary No. 42821-2018XIV

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusSHANGHAI ELECTRIC GROUP CO. LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.182500/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.182501/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

101.121

ConnectedC.A. No. 1995/2019XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONALTAXATION 3

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSHANGHAI ELECTRIC GROUP CO. LTD.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.29303/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.29304/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING

101.122

ConnectedC.A. No. 1415/2019XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONALTAXATION 3

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusSHANGHAI ELECTRIC GROUP CO. LTDFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.13004/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.13005/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OFTHE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

101.123

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 10127/2019IV-A

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT. LTD. KUNAL VERMA

VersusASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFOR ADMISSION

101.124

ConnectedC.A. No. 2006/2019IV-A

INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT. LTD. KUNAL VERMA

VersusDEPUTY COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAXIA No. 124352/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN FILING

101.125

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 21425/2019XIV

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION 1

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBENTLY NEVADA LLCFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.128779/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

Page 45: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 4

101.126

ConnectedC.A. No. 8312/2019XIV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL TAXATION I

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusBENTLY NEVADA LLCFOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.160196/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:26:37

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 46: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 4

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

NOTE :- No request for adjournment will be granted in any of the matter(s) listed for hearing.REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Three Judges Bench Matter - Three Judges Bench Matter

102 C.A. No. 3636/2016III

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMARSHARMA[P-1]

VersusGOPALDAS BHAGWAN DAS AND ORS AND ORS. Y. RAJA GOPALA RAO[R-1],

[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6],[R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10],[R-11], [R-12], [R-13], [R-14]

[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES ]

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:27:08

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 47: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 4

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

NOTE :- No request for adjournment will be granted in any of the matter(s) listed for hearing.REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Three Judges Bench Matter - Three Judges Bench Matter

103 CONMT.PET.(Crl.) No.5/2019 in SPL.REF. No.1/2004XVII-A

SATVIR SINGH RAKESH DAHIYA

VersusSH PRAKASH SINGH BADAL AND ANR.IN SPL.REF. No. - 1/2004,[ TO GO BEFORE THREE HON'BLE JUDGES]CONMT.PET.(CRL.)D37990/2016 IN SPL.REF.NO. 1/2004

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:27:31

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 48: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 4

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

NOTE :- No request for adjournment will be granted in any of the matter(s) listed for hearing.REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Rent Act Matters - Eviction matters of sub-letting

104 C.A. No. 2742/2009IV-A

MONAPPA KOTTARI(D) BY LRS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[P-1]

VersusDAVID PINTO AND ANR. ANIL KUMAR MISHRA-I[R-1],

ROMY CHACKO[R-2]

Direct Taxes Matter - Other matters under Income Tax act, 1961

105 C.A. No. 5782/2008IV

INDUSTRIAL CABLES (I) LTD. MANJU JETLEY

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,PATIALA B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL

KATIYARand IA No.96571/2017-PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTSIA No. 96571/2017 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

105.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 7688/2009IV

INDUSTRIAL CABLES (INDIA) LIMITED MANJU JETLEY

VersusCOMMR.OF INCOME TAX,PATIALA B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL

KATIYARandFOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS ON IA 96574/2017IA No. 96574/2017 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

105.2

ConnectedC.A. No. 5784/2008IV

INDUSTRIAL CABLES (I) LTD. MANJU JETLEY

VersusCOMMR.OF INCOME TAX,PATIALA (PUNJAB) B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL

KATIYAR

Page 49: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 4

andFOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS ON IA 96568/2017IA No. 96568/2017 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

105.3

ConnectedC.A. No. 5785/2008IV

INDUSTRIAL CABLES (INDIA) LTD. MANJU JETLEY

VersusCOMMR.OF INCOME TAX,PATIALA (PUNJAB) B. V. BALARAM DAS, ANIL

KATIYARandFOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS ON IA 96579/2017IA No. 96579/2017 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

Ordinary Civil Matters - Matters relating to specific performance of contract

106 C.A. No. 13516/2015XII

FERRODOUS ESTATES (PVT) LTD. GEETHA KOVILAN[P-1][PR]

VersusP.GOPIRATHNAM (DEAD) AND ORS. AND ORS. VIKAS MEHTA[R-1][PR],

[P-1], VIJAY KUMAR[R-1], K.V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-6], [R-7]

Direct Taxes Matter - SLPs relating to Wealth Tax

107 C.A. No.3964-3971/2007IV-A

M/S. BANGALORE CLUB GAUTAM NARAYAN[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

Ordinary Civil Matters - Others

108 C.A. No. 2019/2010IX

SHRIDHAR C.SHETTY (DECEASED) THR. LRS. E. C. AGRAWALA[P-1]

VersusADDL.COLLECTOR AND COMPETENT AUTHORITYAND ORS.

SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

Mercantile Laws, Commercial Transactions Including Banking - Matters relating torecovery of debts/bank loans due under the banks and financial institutions

109 C.A. No. 11268/2016XVI

STOCK HOLDING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. MOHINDER JIT SINGH

VersusINDUSIND BANK LTD. AND ANR. PAREKH & CO.[CAVEAT][ LIST THE MATTER IN THE MONTH OFJANURARY, 2020 ]

Appeal Against Orders Of Statutory Bodies - Appeals and other matters U/Ss 30 and 31 ofthe Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007

Page 50: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 4

110 C.A. No. 5991/2016XVII

PARAM HANSH MISHRA PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA,

ARVIND KUMARSHARMA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE INPERSON ON IA 1/2016IA No. 1/2016 - PERMISSION TO APPEAR ANDARGUE IN PERSONIA No. 129357/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:28:18

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 51: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 5

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

NOTE:-[ THIS BENCH WLL SIT UPTO 12.55 P.M. AND RE-ASSEMBLE AT 2.00 P.M..]

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Arbitration Matters - SLPs challenging Arbitration Matters

101 C.A. No. 2283/2012XII

INDIA BREWERY AARTHI RAJAN[P-1]

VersusTVS LAKSHMI CREDIT LTD. VIKAS MEHTA

101.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 2499/2012XII

M/S TVS LAKSHMI CREDIT LIMITED VIKAS MEHTA

VersusM/S INDIA BREWERY AND DISTILLERY LTD. AARTHI RAJAN[R-1]

Rent Act Matters - Eviction on the ground of non-payment of rent

102 C.A. No. 8360/2016XVI

KANHAIYA PRASAD SMARHAR SINGH

VersusSUSHILA DEVI RAM KISHOR SINGH

YADAV[CAVEAT][ retain its position ]

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:32:33

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 52: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 5

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Service Matters - Removal/Dismissal/Termination from service or other major penalties

103 C.A. No. 8258/2009XVI

UNITED BANK OF INDIA MITTER & MITTER CO.

VersusBISWANATH BHATTACHARJEE PARTHA SILAs per R.P dated 4.12.2019, list in the third weekof January, 2019

Arbitration Matters - SLPs challenging Arbitration Matters

104 C.A. No. 867-870/2013IV

CHANDIGARH CONSTRUCTION CO. PVT.LTD. AJAY MARWAH

VersusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. UTTARA BABBAR[R-1]

105 C.A. No. 9980/2016IV

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. PRIYA PURI[P-1]

VersusM/S SARAF INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LTD. AND ANR. VIKASH SINGH

105.1

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 34492/2015IV-B

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. PRANAB KUMAR MULLICK

VersusM/S. PUNJAB TRANSFORMERS AND ELECTRONICSLTD. AND ANR.

105.2

ConnectedC.A. No. 5921/2016IV

PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD (NOW PUNJABSTATE POWER CORPORATION LTD.)

PRIYA PURI[P-1]

VersusM/S. A.R. TRANSMISSIONS PVT. LTD AND ANR. GARIMA PRASHAD[R-1]

105.3

ConnectedC.A. No. 5492/2016IV

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S SUPERTECH FORGINGS AND ANR. VIKASH SINGH, [CAVEAT]NOT READY

Page 53: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 5

105.4

ConnectedC.A. No. 2549/2016IV

PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD (NOW PUNJABPOWER SUPPLY CORPORATION LTD.)

PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S. A.R. TRANSMISSIONS PVT. LTD AND ANR. VISHWA PAL SINGHSERVICE COMPLETE.

105.5

ConnectedC.A. No. 619/2017IV

PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD NOW PUNJABSTATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED

PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S JAY BEE INDUSTRIES . AND ANR. AJIT SHARMA, [CAVEAT]

105.6

ConnectedC.A. No. 2546/2016IV

PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD NOW PUNJABSTATE POWER CORPORATION LTD.

PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S PUNJAB TRANSFORMERS AND ELECTRONICSLTD AND ANR.

VIKASH SINGH, [CAVEAT]

SERVICE COMPLETE.

105.7

ConnectedC.A. No. 623/2017IV

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S. PUNJAB TRANSFORMERS AND ANR. VIKASH SINGH[CAVEAT]

105.8

ConnectedC.A. No. 5494/2016IV

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S SANGRUR INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION ANDANR.

VIKASH SINGH, [CAVEAT]

NOT READY

105.9

ConnectedC.A. No. 5006/2016IV

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S PUNJAB TRANSFORMERS AND ANR. VIKASH SINGH[CAVEAT]

105.10

ConnectedC.A. No. 5493/2016IV

PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S. JAY BEE INDUSTRIES AND ANR. AJIT SHARMA[CAVEAT]NOT READY

105.11

ConnectedC.A. No. 2548/2016IV

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S. GURU NANAK ELECTRICALS . AND ANR. VIKASH SINGH, [CAVEAT]SERVICE COMPLETE.

105.12

ConnectedC.A. No. 9983/2016IV

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S SARAF INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LTD. AND ANR. VIKASH SINGH

Page 54: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 5

105.13

ConnectedC.A. No. 2557/2016IV

PUNJAB POWER CORPORATION LIMITED PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S SARAF ELECTRICALS PRIVATE LTD AND ANR. VIKASH SINGH[CAVEAT]SERVICE COMPLETE.

105.14

ConnectedC.A. No. 2555/2016IV

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S DEE KAY MECHANICAL WORKS . AND ANR. VIKASH SINGH, [CAVEAT]SERVICE COMPLETE.

105.15

ConnectedC.A. No. 2553/2016IV

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORP. LTD. PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S DEEPAK WIRE INDUSTRIES . AND ANR. VIKASH SINGH[CAVEAT]SERVICE COMPLETE.

105.16

ConnectedC.A. No. 5012/2016IV

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S TECHNICAL ASSOCIATES INDUSTRIES LTD. .AND ANR.

E. C. AGRAWALA

105.17

ConnectedC.A. No. 5013/2016IV

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S. P.M. ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD. AJIT SHARMA[CAVEAT]

105.18

ConnectedC.A. No. 621/2017IV

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S TECHNICAL ASSOCIATES INDUSTRIES LTD. ANDANR.

E. C. AGRAWALA, [CAVEAT]

105.19

ConnectedC.A. No. 2550/2016IV

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S. TECHNICAL ASSOCIATES INDUSTRIES LTD. . E. C. AGRAWALA[CAVEAT]SERVICE COMPLETE.

105.20

ConnectedC.A. No. 620/2017IV

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S. CAPITAL TRANSFORMERS AND ANR. GAURAV KEJRIWAL,

[CAVEAT]

105.21

ConnectedC.A. No. 5011/2016IV

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S. NUCON POWER CONTROL PVT. LTD. AND ANR. VIKASH SINGH[CAVEAT]

Page 55: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 5

105.22

ConnectedC.A. No. 622/2017IV

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S. NUCON POWER CONTROL LTD. AND ANR. VIKASH SINGH, [CAVEAT]

105.23

ConnectedC.A. No. 5004/2016IV

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S. NUCON SWITCHGEARS PVT. LTD. AND ANR. VIKASH SINGH[CAVEAT]

105.24

ConnectedC.A. No. 2554/2016IV

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S SANGRUR INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION LTD. ANDANR.

VIKASH SINGH, [CAVEAT]

105.25

ConnectedC.A. No. 291/2017IV

PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD NOW PUNJABSTATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED

PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S. MAHASHAKTI CONDUCTORS PVT. LTD. ANDANR.

VIKASH SINGH, [CAVEAT]

105.26

ConnectedC.A. No. 5496/2016IV

PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD NOW PUNJABSTATE POWER CORPORATION LTD.

PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S. SARAF ELECTRICALS AND ANR. VIKASH SINGH, [CAVEAT]NOT READY

105.27

ConnectedC.A. No. 11391/2016IV

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. PRIYA PURI[P-1]

VersusM/S SARAF ELECTRICALS PVT. LTD. AND ANR. VIKASH SINGH

105.28

ConnectedC.A. No. 9987/2016IV

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. PRIYA PURI[P-1]

VersusM/S SANGRUR INDUSTRIAL COMPANY LTD. ANDANR.

VIKASH SINGH

105.29

ConnectedC.A. No. 9991/2016IV

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S SANGRUR INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION LTD. VIKASH SINGH[CAVEAT]

105.30

ConnectedC.A. No. 11392/2016IV

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S. ANDERSONS ASSOCIATES AND ANR. YASH PAL DHINGRA

105.31

ConnectedC.A. No. 11393/2016IV

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. PRIYA PURI[P-1]

Versus

Page 56: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 5

M/S. P.P. INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. AND ANR. VIKASH SINGH

105.32

ConnectedC.A. No. 9985/2016IV

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S. PUNJAB TRANSFORMERS AND ANR. VIKASH SINGH

105.33

ConnectedC.A. No. 9996/2016IV

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S SANGRUR INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION LTD. ANDANR.

VIKASH SINGH[CAVEAT]

105.34

ConnectedC.A. No. 11387/2016IV

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. PRIYA PURI

VersusM/S J R INDUSTRIES AND ANR. ADARSH UPADHYAY,

[CAVEAT]

105.35

ConnectedC.A. No. 11389/2016IV

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. PRIYA PURI[P-1]

VersusM/S SANJAY CONDUCTORS AND CABLES AND ANR. VIKASH SINGH[R-1]

105.36

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 26242/2019IV-B

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LTD. PRIYA PURI[P-1]

VersusM/S SHIV SHAKTI ELECTRICALS AND ANR. VIKASH SINGH[R-1]IA No. 64281/2019 - STAY APPLICATION

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:32:44

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 57: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 5

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Land Laws And Agricultural Tenancies - Others

106 C.A. No. 7346/2010X

THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER REVENUE ANDORS.

JATINDER KUMARBHATIA[P-1]

VersusAKHALAQ HUSSAIN . AND ANR. MANJU JETLEY[R-1]IA No. 168658/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:32:55

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 58: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 5

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Ordinary Civil Matters - Others

107 C.A. No. 7774/2014XIV-A

RAVINDER KUMAR SEJWAL AND ANR. ATUL SHARMA[P-2]

VersusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ASHWANI KUMAR[R-1]IA No. 81393/2019 - APPLICATION FORSUBSTITUTIONIA No. 81400/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN FILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN.IA No. 81397/2019 - SETTING ASIDE ANABATEMENT

Arbitration Matters - SLPs challenging Arbitration Matters

108 C.A. No. 6216/2012XII

SUPER DIAMOND TOOLS AND ORS. PRAMOD DAYAL

VersusK.MOHAN RAO P. I. JOSE

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:33:04

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 59: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 5

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Arbitration Matters - SLPs challenging Arbitration Matters

109 C.A. No.4860-4861/2018XII

TAMIL NADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTIONCORPORATION LIMITED (TANGEDCO)

PAREKH & CO.

VersusM/S VIDEOCON POWER LIMITED AND ANR. S. S. SHROFF, RAMESHWAR

PRASAD GOYAL

109.1

ConnectedC.A. No.4862-4864/2018XII

TAMIL NADU GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTIONCORPORATION LIMITED (TANGEDCO)

PAREKH & CO.

VersusM/S. VIDEOCON POWER LTD. AND ANR S. S. SHROFF

110 C.A. No.7381-7384/2009XIV-A

ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INFRASTRUCTURELTD.(APIL)

K.PARAMESHWAR[P-1]

VersusCENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF TELEMATICS(CDOT)

S. K. DHINGRA[R-1]

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:33:11

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 60: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 6

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

NOTE:-BY : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

FOR JUDGEMENT

1501 SLP(C) No.5926-5927/2017XIV

OM PRAKASH M. C. DHINGRA

VersusSURESH KUMAR SHARMILA UPADHYAY[ HEARD BY : HON'BLE A.M. KHANWILKAR,HON'BLE HEMANT GUPTA AND HON'BLEDINESH MAHESHWARI, JJ. ]

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:41:26

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 61: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 6

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Indirect Taxes Matters - Sales Tax Act (Central & various States)

101 C.A. No.10680-10683/2011IV-A

M/S HIGH RANGE COFFEE CURING PVT.LTD. MITTER & MITTER CO.

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY, RADHA

RANGASWAMY

101.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 10684/2011IV-A

M/S HIGH RANGE COFFEE CURING PVT.LTD. MITTER & MITTER CO.[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. JOSEPH ARISTOTLE S.[R-1],

[R-2], [R-3], RADHARANGASWAMY[R-4]

Criminal Matters - Others

102 Crl.A. No.1431-1434/2010II-B

STATE OF HARYANA VISHWA PAL SINGH

VersusSURINDER ETC. YASH PAL DHINGRA, RAVI

KUMAR TOMAR, HARINDERMOHAN SINGH[R-1], [R-1]

IA No. 48274/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:41:33

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 62: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 6

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Ordinary Civil Matters - Others

103 C.A. No. 7764/2014IV

RAVINDER KAUR GREWAL AND ORS. PREM MALHOTRA[P-1]

VersusMANJIT KAUR AND ORS. SANJAY JAIN[R-1], [R-2],

[R-3]

104 C.A. No. 3961/2010XVI

TRILOKI NATH SINGH S. K. BHATTACHARYA

VersusANIRUDH SINGH (D) THR. LRS . AND ORS.LIST IN THE MONTH OF JANUARY, 2020 VIDEHON'BLE COURT'S ORDER DATED 12.12.2019

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:41:44

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 63: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 6

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Land Acquisition & Requisition Matters - Matters challenging the acquisitionproceedings

105 C.A. No. 4287/2011XIV-A

MADHU GAUR K. S. RANA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI, ANIL

KATIYAR[R-2], [R-3]

105.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 4292/2011XIV-A

M/S FIVE STAR TRADING AND INVESTMENTCOMPANY LIMITED

KRISHNA KUMAR

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR, SUSHMA

SURI, SAHARYA & CO.

105.2

ConnectedC.A. No.4288-4289/2011XIV-A

M/S. MARVELOUS EXPORTS P.LTD. MONIKA GUSAIN

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI, , ANIL

KATIYAR, SAHARYA &CO.[R-5]

Criminal Matters - Others

106 Crl.A. No. 1033/2013II-A

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH SWARUPAMACHATURVEDI[P-1]

VersusRAJDHAR SINGH . AND ORS. MERUSAGAR

SAMANTARAY[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4]

107 Crl.A. No. 2151/2010II-A

SOU. DHONDABAI BALKRISHNA CHINCHANE RAJIV SHANKARDVIVEDI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL, [R-1]

Page 64: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:41:50

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 65: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 6

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Direct Taxes Matter - Deductions/exemptions

108 C.A. No. 4088/2016IV

M/S VARDHMAN TEXTILES LIMITED KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMNR. OF INCOME TAX I B. V. BALARAM DAS[ AT TOP ]

108.1 ConnectedC.A. No. 4089/2016IV

M/S VARDHMAN TEXTILES LTD. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIOSNER OF INCOME TAX I B. V. BALARAM DAS

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:41:55

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 66: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 6

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Indirect Taxes Matters - Appeals u/s 35 L of Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944.

109 C.A. No. 1091/2009XVI

COMMR.OF CENTRAL EXCISE,JAMSHEDPUR B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S TATA STEEL LTD. RAJAN NARAINAs per ROP dated 24.10.2019, list the matter on30.01.2020.IA No. 3/2016 - PERMISSION TO FILEANNEXURES

Direct Taxes Matter - Other matters under Income Tax act, 1961

110 C.A. No.2899-2902/2011XIV-A

M/S SHIV SHAKTI FLOUR MISSL (P) LTD. THROUGHDIRECTOR

KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX B. V. BALARAM DAS[ AT TOP ]

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:42:01

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 67: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 7

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUDHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Ordinary Civil Matters - Others

101 C.A. No. 1318/2017XII

M/S EDELWEISS ASSET CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. M. RAMBABU ANDCO.[P-1][PR]

VersusR. PERUMALSWAMY AND ORS. AND ORS. A.

LAKSHMINARAYANAN[R-1],M. YOGESHKANNA[R-3][GR], K. V.VIJAYAKUMAR[R-3], D. L.CHIDANANDA[R-8], [R-8],[R-9]RAKESH K. SHARMA[IMPL],ASTHAa TYAGI[IMPL]

[ RETAIN ITS POSITION ] [ INSTANT MATTER ISRELEASED FROM PART HEARD ]IA No. 96552/2018 - I/A FOR REFERRING THEDISPUTE TO MEDIATIONIA No. 107609/2018 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 107514/2018 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

101.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 1319/2017XII

W.S. INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LTD THROUGH ITS CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER MR. SWAMINATHAN

E. C. AGRAWALA[P-1]

VersusR. PERUMALSWAMY AND ORS. RADHA SHYAM JENA[R-1], K.

V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-2], [R-3],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], M.RAMBABU AND CO.[R-7]RAKESH K. SHARMA[IMPL],ASTHA TYAGI[IMPL]

FOR FOR [FOR REFERRING THE DISPURT TOTHE MEDIATION] ON IA 96550/2018 FORINTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA107510/2018 FOR impleading party ON IA107620/2018 FORINTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA107620/2018IA No. 96550/2018 - FOR REFERRING THEDISPURT TO THE MEDIATION

Page 68: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 7

IA No. 107620/2018 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 107510/2018 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

101.2

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.1906/2017 in C.A. No.1319/2017XII

W. S. INDUSTRIES (INDIA) LTD. E. C. AGRAWALA

VersusR. PERUMALSWAMY S. GOWTHAMAN[R-1]IN C.A. No. - 1319/2017,

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:30:51

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 69: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 7

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUDHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Criminal Matters - Others

102 Crl.A. No.142-144/2008II-C

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA[P-1]

VersusMOHAMMED SAFI AND ORS. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN[R-1],

REVATHY RAGHAVAN[R-2],[R-3], [R-4], [R-6], [R-8],ANZU. K. VARKEY[R-7]

RETAIN ITS POSITION

Matters Pertaining To Armed Forces & Paramilitary Forces - Matters Pertaining ToArmed Forces & Paramilitary Forces

103 C.A. No. 4410/2012XVI

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]

VersusSURESH KUMAR SINGH NEERAJ SHEKHAR[R-1]

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:31:43

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 70: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 7

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUDHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Criminal Matters - Others

104 Crl.A. No. 2178/2009II-B

RAJBIR K. K. MOHAN

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN[R-1]

Ordinary Civil Matters - Others

105 C.A. No. 8313/2009IV-A

KRISHNA KUMARI SAURABH TRIVEDI[P-1]

VersusASHOK KUMAR AND ORS. PRATIBHA JAIN[R-1]REMAIN ON BOARD

Matters Relating To Consumer Protection - Appeals u/s 23 of Consumer Protection Act,1986.

106 C.A. No. 5459/2013XVII-A

ASSAM BROOK LTD ABHIJEET SINHA

VersusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD AND ANR. RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA[R-1],

[R-2]

Criminal Matters - Matters filed by complainant against Acquittal

107 Crl.A. No.2017-2019/2017II-A

JAI PRAKASH KUNWAR SHISHIR PINAKI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. SANTOSH KUMAR - I[R-1],

FAUZIA SHAKIL[R-3]

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:31:51

Page 71: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 72: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 7

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUDHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Indirect Taxes Matters - Sales Tax Act (Central & various States)

108 C.A. No. 3773/2011III-A

M/S TRIVENI GLASS LIMITED THROUGH ITSDEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER (SALES AND P.R.) R.K.SINHA

ANISH AGARWAL[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX, U.P. BHAKTI VARDHAN

SINGH[R-1]

108.1

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 29516/2013XI

M/S TRIVENI GLASS LTD ANISH AGARWAL[P-1]

VersusASSISTANT COMMR.(ASSTT.)TRADE TAX BHAKTI VARDHAN

SINGH[R-1], [R-2]

108.2

ConnectedSLP(C) No.12236-12237/2018XI

M/S TRIVENI GLASS LTD. ANISH AGARWAL[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER TRADE TAX U. P. BHAKTI VARDHAN

SINGH[R-1], [R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.54910/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IANo.54907/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING

108.3

ConnectedDiary No. 10047-2018XI

TRIVENI GLASS LIMITED ANISH AGARWAL[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX BHAKTI VARDHAN

SINGH[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.66415/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.66417/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.and IANo.66416/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING

Page 73: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:31:58

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 74: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 7

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUDHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Criminal Matters - Others

109 Crl.A. No. 2024/2008II-C

PAPPATHI @ KUPPATHAL S. RAVI SHANKAR[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ORS.ETC.

M. YOGESH KANNA, [R-1],GEETHA KOVILAN[R-2][PR],[R-3][PR], [R-4][PR],[R-5][PR], [R-6][PR], [R-7][PR]

Service Matters - Condition of service

110 C.A. No. 10639/2010XVI

AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA M. V. KINI &ASSOCIATES[P-1]

VersusDILIP BHUSHAN AND ORS. SARLA CHANDRA[R-1],

SUSHMA SURI[R-1]

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:32:05

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 75: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

NOTE:-BY: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

FOR JUDGEMENT

1501 Crl.A. No. 138/2020II

AHMAD ALI QURAISHI AND ANR. S. K. VERMA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR. GARVESH KABRA[R-1], V. N.

RAGHUPATHY[R-2]HEARD BY- HON. ASHOK BHUSHAN AND HON.M.R.SHAH, JJ.

1502 C.A. No. 710/2020XII-A

N. MOTILAL AND ORS. TARUN GUPTA

VersusFAISAL BIN ALI AND ANR. M. RAMBABU AND

CO.[CAVEAT]HEARD BY- HON. ASHOK BHUSHAN AND HON.M.R.SHAH, JJ.

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:44:16

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 76: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

NOTE:-BY: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

FOR JUDGEMENT

1503 C.A. No. 652/2020III

VAIJINATH S/O YESHWANTA JADHAV DECEASED BYL.RS. AND ANR.

AMOL B. KARANDE

VersusAFSAR BEGUM W/O NAIDIMUDDIN DECEASED BYL.RS. AND ORS.

ANJANI KUMARJHA[R-1.1][CAVEAT][CAVEAT], [R-2][CAVEAT][CAVEAT]

HEARD BY HON. ASHOK BHUSHAN AND HON.NAVIN SINHA, JJ.

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:44:34

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 77: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

NOTE:-[ THIS BENCH WILL SIT UPTO 12.55 P.M. AND RE-ASSEMBLE AT 2.00 P.M. ]

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Direct Taxes Matter - Deductions/exemptions

101 C.A. No. 11842/2018XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]TOP OF THE BOARDFOR ADMISSION and I.R. andIA No.119420/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING

101.1

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 32929/2018XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED (FORMERLYKNOWN M/S. MARUTI UDYOG LTD.)

KAVITA JHA

IA No.140408/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.140410/2018-EXEMPTIONFROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT

101.2

ConnectedC.A. No. 11919/2018XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6 (FORMERLYCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II) NEW DELHI

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED (FORMERLYMARUTI UDYOG LTD.) NEW DELHI

KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.137205/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.137207/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/COF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

101.3

ConnectedC.A. No. 11920/2018XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusM/S. MARUTI UDYOG LTD. KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.155109/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.155110/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING

Page 78: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 8

101.4

ConnectedDiary No. 33387-2018XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED (FORMERLYMARUTI UDYOG LTD.)

KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.151988/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.151989/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING

101.5

ConnectedC.A. No. 11921/2018XIV-A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. THROUGH DIRECTOR KAVITA

JHA[CAVEAT][CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.142970/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING[ TO BE TAKEN UP ALONG WITH ITEM NO.45 I.E.SLP(C)NO.9074/2018 ]

101.6

ConnectedC.A. No. 11977/2018XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6 (FORMERLYCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II)

ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED (FORMERLYMARUTI UDYOG LTD.)

KAVITAJHA[CAVEAT][CAVEAT]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.143757/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

101.7

ConnectedC.A. No. 11835/2018XIV-A

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI LIMITED KAVITA

JHA[CAVEAT][CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.157069/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

101.8

ConnectedC.A. No. 34/2019XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED KAVITA

JHA[CAVEAT][CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.154277/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

101.9

ConnectedC.A. No. 33/2019XIV-A

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.159765/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

101.10

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 3826/2019XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]

Page 79: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 8

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.181936/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.181938/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING

101.11

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 6631/2019XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusM/S MARUTI UDYOG LIMITED (NOW KNOWN ASMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED

KAVITA JHA[R-1]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.13185/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.13192/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INREFILING

101.12

ConnectedDiary No. 44704-2018XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX II ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]

101.13

ConnectedDiary No. 23919-2019XIV

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 6 ANIL KATIYAR

VersusMARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. KAVITA JHA[CAVEAT]IA No. 119413/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN FILINGIA No. 119415/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGC/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:44:38

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 80: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Personal Law Matters - Matters relating to partition

102 C.A. No. 3934/2006IV-A

P. ANJANAPPA (D) BY LRS. AND ORS. NAVEEN R. NATH[P-1]

VersusA.P. NANJUNDAPPA AND ORS. DEVASA & CO.[R-1], [R-2], S.

N. BHAT[R-3], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6.4], [R-6.3], [R-6.2],[R-6.1], RAJEEV SINGH[R-9]

[ REMAIN ON THE BOARD ]IA No. 68047/2017 - APPLICATION FORSUBSTITUTION

Ordinary Civil Matters - Others

103 C.A. No. 756/2013IV

GIAN SINGH . AND ORS. JYOTI MENDIRATTA

VersusMADAN SAIN @ KULWANT SINGH AND ORS. S. JANANI[ Retain its Position ]

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:44:50

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 81: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Rent Act Matters - Eviction matters of personal necessity

104 C.A. No. 7810/2013XIV-A

JAI KISHAN BANSAL(D) TR.LRS. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

VersusMOHD.ISHTYAQUDDIN K. S. RANAIA No. 20402/2019 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTIONIA No. 113374/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

104.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 7813/2013XIV-A

JAI KISHAN BANSAL(D) TR.LRS. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

VersusMOHD ISHTYAQUDDIN K. S. RANA

104.2

ConnectedC.A. No. 7812/2013XIV-A

JAI KISHAN BANSAL(D) TR.LRS. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

VersusMOHD.IMTIYAZ K. S. RANA

105 C.A. No. 7883/2012XVII

MANJU SINGH CHANDRA PRAKASH

VersusSHANTI DEVI S. K. VERMA

HITENDRA NATHRATH[IMPL], RACHITTAPRIYANKA[I-3][LR/S][PR]

[ REMAIN ON THE BOARD ]

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:44:56

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 82: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Land Laws And Agricultural Tenancies - Others

106 C.A. No. 6990/2014IV

STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH SECRETARY TOGOVERNMENT OF HARYANA

MONIKA GUSAIN[P-1]

VersusJAI SINGH AND ORS. RAVINDRA BANA[R-1],

CHANDER SHEKHARASHRI[R-1], ASHOK KUMARSINGH[R-1]

IA No. 8/2014 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING APPLICATION FOR RESTORATIONIA No. 5/2005 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN.IA No. 7/2014 - RESTORATION

106.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 6991/2014IV

SOHAN SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH PROPOSED LR. K. K. MOHAN

VersusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. MONIKA GUSAIN[R-1], B. K.

SATIJA[R-2]IA No. 2/2004 - APPLICATION FORSUBSTITUTIONIA No. 3/2004 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING SUBSTITUTION APPLN.

106.2

ConnectedC.A. No. 6992/2014IV

GYASI RAM R. C. KAUSHIK

VersusCOLLECTOR AND ORS. B. K. SATIJA, ANKUR

MITTAL[R-3]

106.3

ConnectedC.A. No. 6997/2014IV

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. MONIKA GUSAIN

VersusBIRSA SINGH

106.4

ConnectedC.A. No. 7001/2014IV

NISHAN SINGH AND ORS. UMANG SHANKAR[P-1], [P-2],[P-3], [P-4]

Page 83: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 8

VersusGRAM PANCHAYAT AND ORS. P. N. PURI, KAMAL MOHAN

GUPTA, SANJAY KUMARVISEN[R-2], [R-3]

106.5

ConnectedSLP(C) No.31052-31053/2014IV-B

BHOPAL SINGH AND ANR. SURENDER SINGH HOODA

VersusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. RANBIR SINGH YADAV,

MONIKA GUSAIN, ARVINDMINOCHA, B. K. SATIJA[R-1]

106.6

ConnectedC.A. No. 4435/2015IV

STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. SANJAY KUMAR VISEN

VersusVIR SINGH AND ORS.

106.7

ConnectedC.A. No.6610-6612/2016IV

BHAG SINGH (DEAD) AJAY PAL

VersusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. A. N. ARORA, B. K.

SATIJA[R-3], MANJUJETLEY[R-5]

106.8

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 28528/2017IV-B

M/S. ASF BUILDWELL PVT. LTD. GAUTAM TALUKDAR

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. B. K. SATIJA[R-4]IA No. 96029/2017 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 103939/2017 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 103938/2017 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESIA No. 96026/2017 - PERMISSION TO FILELENGTHY LIST OF DATES

106.9

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 1072/2018IV-B

THE STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. B. K. SATIJA

VersusSURAJ BHAN AND ORS. GAUTAM

TALUKDAR[CAVEAT],ANUBHAAGRAWAL[CAVEAT], RAKESHDAHIYA[R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

106.10

ConnectedDiary No. 14965-2018IV-B

DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYATS DEPARTMENTHARYANA AND ANR.

B. K. SATIJA

VersusRAM SINGH AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.67107/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IANo.67108/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHYLIST OF DATES

Page 84: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 8

IA No. 67107/2018 - CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILINGIA No. 67108/2018 - PERMISSION TO FILELENGTHY LIST OF DATES

106.11

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 29607/2018IV-B

RABINDRA NATH GUPTA AND ANR. K. V. MOHAN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.IA No. 137863/2018 - DELETING THE NAME OFPETITIONER/RESPONDENT

106.12

ConnectedSLP(C) No.205-210/2019IV-B

DROPTI AND ORS. SUBHASISH BHOWMICK

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

106.13

ConnectedSLP(C) No.211-217/2019IV-B

GURPAL SINGH AND ANR. SUBHASISH BHOWMICK

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.IA No.179567/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.179569/2018-APPLICATIONFOR SUBSTITUTION and IA No.179568/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION(SLP/TP/WP/..) and IA No.179571/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILINGSUBSTITUTION APPLN.

106.14

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 220/2019IV-B

DEVKI AND ORS. SUBHASISH BHOWMICK

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.IA No.183843/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.183844/2018-APPLICATIONFOR SUBSTITUTION and IA No.183846/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION(SLP/TP/WP/..) and IA No.183847/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILINGSUBSTITUTION APPLN.

106.15

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 3507/2019IV-B

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL BAHADURGARH SUBHASISH BHOWMICK

VersusPEHLAD SINGH G. BALAJI[R-1]

106.16

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 3559/2019IV-B

MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, BAHADURGARH SUBHASISH BHOWMICK

VersusSUNITA DEVI G. BALAJI[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R.

106.17

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 4062/2019IV-B

PALA RAM AND ANR. AJAY PAL

Page 85: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 8

VersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ROBIN KHOKHAR[R-4]

Service Matters - Condition of service

107 C.A. No. 2232/2006XVI

SHREE DIGAMBAR JAIN VIDYALAYA AND ANR. BIJOY KUMAR JAIN

VersusMAHENDRA NARAIN PATHAK AND OTHERS RADHA RANGASWAMY,

PRADEEP MISRA

Direct Taxes Matter - Deductions/exemptions

108 C.A. No. 3453/2007IX

ASHWINI SAHAKARI RUGNALAYA & RES. CENTRE P. S. SUDHEER[P-1]

VersusCHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX . AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:45:20

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 86: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Criminal Matters - Matters relating to Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA)

109 Crl.A. No. 2463/2014II-C

SHAILENDRA SWARUP JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

VersusTHE DEPUTY DIRECTOR,ENFORCEMENTDIRECTORATE

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

[ Retain its Position ]

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:45:33

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 87: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHANHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Personal Law Matters - Matters relating to partition

110 C.A. No.4459-4460/2016IV-A

CHINNAMMA AND ORS. E. C. VIDYA SAGAR[P-1]

VersusMUNI REDDY . AND ORS. RAJESH MAHALE[R-1], UDAY

B. DUBE[R-1][ Retain its Position ]

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:45:40

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 88: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Personal Law Matters - Others

101 C.A. No. 6875/2008IV-A

BHAGWAT SHARAN (DEAD THR. LRS.)) PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1.4],[P-1.3], [P-1.2], [P-1]

VersusPURUSHOTAM . AND ORS. NIRAJ SHARMA, YASH PAL

DHINGRA, MANJEET KIRPAL,B. K. SATIJA, ARJUNGARG[R-3], SUHAAS RATNAJOSHI[R-4.2], [R-4.1]

PART HEARD BY HON. L. NAGESWARA RAO ANDHON. DEEPAK GUPTA, JJ.

101.1

ConnectedC.A. No.6876-6877/2008IV-A

BHAGWAT SHARAN (DEAD THR. LRS.)) PRATIBHA JAIN, [P-1.4],[P-1.3], [P-1.2], [P-1.1]

VersusPURSHOTTAM . AND ORS. NIRAJ SHARMA, YASH PAL

DHINGRA, S. K. VERMA,MANJEET KIRPAL, B. K.SATIJA, ARJUN GARG,SUHAAS RATNAJOSHI[R-4.2], [R-4.1],VIKRANT SINGH BAIS[R-8]

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:25:15

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 89: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Criminal Matters - Others

102 Crl.A. No. 135/2010II-B

BUDHADEV KARMASKAR JAIL PETITION[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. CHANCHAL KUMAR

GANGULI[R-1], , V. G.PRAGASAM[R-1],SWARUPAMACHATURVEDI[R-1], SUSHMASURI[R-1], SUNILFERNANDES[R-1], SAVITASINGH[R-1], SAURABHa TRIVEDI[R-1], SANJAYKUMAR VISEN[R-1], S..UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-1],ROHIT KUMAR SINGH[R-1],RAMESHWAR PRASADGOYAL[R-1], RADHA SHYAMJENA[R-1], P. V.a DINESH[R-1], M. T.GEORGE[R-1], LIZMATHEW[R-1], KULDIPSINGH[R-1], KIRANBHARDWAJ[R-1], KAMALMOHAN GUPTA[R-1],JOSEPH ARISTOTLE S.[R-1],JATINDERa KUMAR BHATIA[R-1],JASPREET GOGIA[R-1],IRSHAD AHMAD[R-1],HEMANTIKA WAHI[R-1],GOPAL SINGH[R-1],GARVESH KABRA[R-1],GARIMA PRASHAD[R-1], G.a INDIRA[R-1], DIKSHARAI[R-1], DHARMENDRAKUMAR SINHA[R-1], D. S.MAHRA[R-1], , D. MAHESHBABU[R-1], C. K. SASI[R-1],BALAJI SRINIVASAN[R-1], B.V.

Page 90: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 9

a BALARAM DAS[R-1],ASWATHI M.K.[R-1], ASHOKKUMAR SINGH[R-1], ASHAGOPALAN NAIR[R-1],ARPUTHAM ARUNA ANDCO[R-1], APARNA BHAT[R-1],ANUVRATa SHARMA[R-1],ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1],ANIL SHRIVASTAV[R-1],ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], ANIL K.JHA[R-1], A.SUBHASHINI[R-1],CORPORATE LAWGROUP[R-1],a GURMEET SINGHMAKKER[R-4], ASTHASHARMA[R-4]

IA No. 87023/2018 - APPLICATION FORINSPECTION OF FILE

102.1

ConnectedSLP(Crl.)...CRLMP No.11882/2013II-C

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH D. MAHESH BABU

VersusTARAFOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA11882/2013. Tagged with Crl. Appeal No.135 of2010.IA No. 11882/2013 - CONDONATION OF DELAYIN FILING

Service Matters - Pay scales

103 C.A. No.3040-3041/2017XVI

SHOHIDULLAH RAUF RAHIM[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. MADHUMITA

BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], MITHILESH KUMARSINGH[R-4], [R-5], [R-6]

As per record of proceeding dated 25.7.2019, listthe appeals after three months

103.1

ConnectedC.A. No.3042-3043/2017XVI

THE STATE OF BENGAL AND ORS. MADHUMITABHATTACHARJEE[P-1]

VersusSHYAMSUNDER MOHANTO . AND ORS. SOMNATH

MUKHERJEE[R-1],MITHILESH KUMARSINGH[R-1], DEVASHISHBHARUKA[R-1]

103.2

ConnectedC.A. No. 3044/2017XVI

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. MADHUMITABHATTACHARJEE[P-1]

Versus

Page 91: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 9

BISHALI BANERJEE AND ORS. S.K. SINHA[R-1], MITHILESHKUMAR SINGH[R-1], AMITPAWAN[R-1]

103.3

ConnectedC.A. No. 3278/2017XVI

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. MADHUMITABHATTACHARJEE[P-1]

VersusSAUVIK GHOSH AND ORS. MITHILESH KUMAR

SINGH[R-1], AMITPAWAN[R-1]

FOR VACATING STAY ON IA 115708/2017FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES ON IA100050/2019IA No. 100050/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURESIA No. 115708/2017 - VACATING STAY

Service Matters - Removal/Dismissal/Termination from service or other major penalties

104 C.A. No. 6354/2009IV

JASMER SINGH JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR. UTTARA BABBAR[R-1], C. S.

N. MOHAN RAO, [R-2]

Ordinary Civil Matters - Matters relating to specific performance of contract

105 C.A. No. 6855/2008IX

MOHD.CHAND MUJAWAR (D) THR.LRS. AND ANR. RAVINDRA KESHAVRAOADSURE

VersusRAGHUNATH SHANKAR KELKAR ABHA R. SHARMAREMAIN ON BOARD

106 C.A. No. 4266/2012IV

SOM PRAKASH CHELA M.D.S.,UDASI (D) THR.LRS MOHAN PANDEY

VersusKARAM DASS(D) THR. LRS. . AND ORS. K. K. MOHANIn terms of Court's Order dated 05.12.2019, Mr.Puneet Jain is appearing on behalf of appellants.

Criminal Matters - Others

107 Crl.A. No. 1978/2011II-C

SAMRAJ VIJAY KUMAR[P-1][AMICUSCURIAE]

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

Ordinary Civil Matters - Others

108 C.A. No.8802-8803/2013III

SITABAI SHANTARAM TALAWNEKAR AND ORS. T. MAHIPAL

VersusCUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY . AND ORS. K J JOHN AND CO

ABHINAV MUKERJI[IMPL]

Page 92: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 9

108.1

ConnectedCONMT.PET.(C) No.187-188/2012 In C.A.No. 8802-8803/2013III

SITABAI SHANTARAM TALAWNEKAR T. MAHIPAL

VersusARJUN VASSUDEV TALAWNEKAR

Criminal Matters - Others

109 Crl.A. No. 2205/2014II-A

HAJARILAL . AND ANR. T. MAHIPAL[P-1], MINAKSHIVIJ[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH HARSH PARASHAR[R-1]

Service Matters - Disciplinary proceedings

110 C.A. No. 6731/2010XIV-A

HOTEL CORP.OF INDIA LTD M. V. KINI & ASSOCIATES

VersusBALWINDER SINGH NIGAH TAMALI WADIA No. 138360/2017 - APPROPRIATEORDERS/DIRECTIONS

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:25:43

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 93: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAOHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Ordinary Civil Matters - Others

111 C.A. No. 668-670/2017III

LT. GEN. SHANTONU CHOUDHRY AND ORS. ETC. RAVINDRA KESHAVRAOADSURE

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC. AND ORS. YASH PAL DHINGRA,

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR, J S WADAND CO, GURMEET SINGHMAKKER, M. V. KINI &ASSOCIATES, MUKESHKUMAR MARORIA[R-1]

List this matters in January, 2020IA No. 39901/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILEADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

111.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 673/2017III

ADARSH CO-OP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. GOPAL BALWANTSATHE[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. YASH PAL DHINGRA[R-1],

RAJ KAMAL[R-1][IMPL],GURMEET SINGHMAKKER[R-1]

111.2

ConnectedC.A. No. 672/2017III

ADARSH CO-OP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD GOPAL BALWANTSATHE[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR

SHARMA[R-1], J S WAD ANDCO[R-2]

111.3

ConnectedC.A. No. 671/2017III

ADARSH CO-OP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. GOPAL BALWANTSATHE[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ORS. YASH PAL DHINGRA[R-1], J S

WAD AND CO[R-1], M. V.KINI & ASSOCIATES[R-1]

Page 94: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 9

111.4

ConnectedC.A. No. 674/2017III

SURGEON CAPTAIN DR. P. SHYAMSUNDER TAMPI(RETD.) AND ORS.

BANKEY BIHARI

VersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. YASH PAL DHINGRA,

GURMEET SINGH MAKKER

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:25:57

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 95: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAULHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.NOTE :- Parties to get ready with short synopsis of not more than three (3) pages each in the finalhearing/disposal matters.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Land Laws And Agricultural Tenancies - Others

101 C.A. No. 8587/2018III-A

SRI RAMAN DAS RAJAT SINGH[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1],

[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]PART-HEARD BY HON'BLE SANJAY KISHANKAUL AND HON'BLE K.M. JOSEPH ,JJ.

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:30:54

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 96: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAULHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.NOTE :- Parties to get ready with short synopsis of not more than three (3) pages each in the finalhearing/disposal matters.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Personal Law Matters - Matters relating to Gift

102 C.A. No. 5725/2009XI-A

RAGINI DEVI M. P. VINOD

VersusKAMALAKSHY (DEAD) AND ORS. RADHA SHYAM JENA[R-2.9],

[R-2.1], [R-2.8], [R-2.7],[R-2.6], [R-2.5], [R-2.4],[R-2.3], [R-2.2]

[ PART-HEARD BY HON'BLE SANJAY KISHANKAUL AND HON'BLE K.M. JOSEPH, JJ. ] [REMAIN ON BOARD ]IA No. 7891/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:31:02

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 97: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAULHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.NOTE :- Parties to get ready with short synopsis of not more than three (3) pages each in the finalhearing/disposal matters.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Labour Matters - Dismissal

103 C.A. No.8111-8112/2009IV-A

M/S ALSTOM PROJECTS LTD S. S. RANA & CO.

VersusA.AZIZ V. G. PRAGASAM

Criminal Matters - Criminal matters in which sentence awarded is up to five years

104 Crl.A. No. 2437/2009II-C

SURESHA K. V. BHARATHI UPADHYAYA

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA V. N. RAGHUPATHY[ REMAIN ON BOARD ]

Rent Act Matters - Eviction on the ground of non-payment of rent

105 C.A. No. 3294/2012XII-A

SARASWATI PRASAD SINGH ANJANI AIYAGARI

VersusABDUL REHMAN (DEAD) BY LRS. K. RAJEEV

Service Matters - Seniority

106 C.A. No.3542-3543/2010XI-A

SHRI GOVINDA CHANDRA TIRIA SHIBASHISH MISRA[P-1]

VersusSIBAJI CHARAN PANDA AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1],

SHREEKANT N.TERDAL[R-2], [R-3], ABHIJITSENGUPTA[R-4]

Page 98: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:31:12

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 99: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAULHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.NOTE :- Parties to get ready with short synopsis of not more than three (3) pages each in the finalhearing/disposal matters.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Rent Act Matters - Others

107 C.A. No. 8339/2010IV

NAND KISHORE JITENDRA KUMAR

VersusGIAN KAUR

Service Matters - Recruitment/Transfer/Compassionate Appointment

108 C.A. No.7720-7721/2012IX

NANDKISHOR ANAGHA S. DESAI

VersusZILLA PARISHAD, AKOLA . AND ORS. CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI,

RAVINDRA KESHAVRAOADSURE

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:31:21

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 100: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAULHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.NOTE :- Parties to get ready with short synopsis of not more than three (3) pages each in the finalhearing/disposal matters.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Personal Law Matters - Matters relating to testamentary succession

109 C.A. No.1829-1830/2014XII-A

SHAIK HUSSAIN BI (DEAD) BY LRS. ABHIJIT SENGUPTA

VersusAMARA VENKATA SUBBAIAH & SONS . AND ORS. B. RAMANA MURTHY

Labour Matters - Matters relating to wages, bonus, ad-hoc, casual daily wages & theirregularisation

110 C.A. No. 3600/2009XI-A

MANAGEMENT OF DIRECTOR,MICROWAVE ETR. RAJIV SHANKARDVIVEDI[P-1]

VersusWORKMEN,REP.BY PRES.O.T.M.M.SANGHA ANDANR.

TEJASWI KUMARPRADHAN[R-1]

I.

110.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 747/2013XI-A

C.M.D. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. AND ORS. PIYUSH SHARMA

VersusPUNIA SAHOO AND ORS. SHIBASHISH

MISRA[CAVEAT]

Service Matters - Removal/Dismissal/Termination from service or other major penalties

111 C.A. No. 438/2013III

KU. JAYSHREE ANAGHA S. DESAI

VersusHIGH SCHOOL SOCIETY SAONER. AND ORS. CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI,

ASHA GOPALAN NAIR

Service Matters - Recruitment/Transfer/Compassionate Appointment

Page 101: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 11

112 C.A. No.10651-10652/2010XVI-A

SURESH SHARMA SADOTRA SUMITA HAZARIKA[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR THROUGHCHIEF SECRETARY AND ORS.

M. SHOEB ALAM[R-1], [R-2],RAJIV TALWAR[R-3],MANJULA GUPTA[R-4]

Labour Matters - Dismissal

113 C.A. No. 2670/2009III-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. RAJ BAHADUR YADAV[P-1]

VersusRAM MISHRA

Criminal Matters - Others

114 Crl.A. No. 897/2014(SCLSC) II-A

ASHOK MANIKA TRIPATHYPANDEY[P-1][SCLSC]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

Criminal Matters - Criminal matters relating to bail/interim bail/anticipatory bail

115 Crl.A. No. 476/2016II-B

RAJESH AGARWAL KEDAR NATH TRIPATHY

VersusSRINIVAS GUNDLURI AND ANR. TATINI BASU, SIBO SANKAR

MISHRA

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:31:27

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 102: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Ordinary Civil Matters - Others

101 C.A. No.1798-1799/2014IV-A

M.S.BHAVANI AND ANR. YASHRAJ SINGH DEORA

VersusM.S.RAGHU NANDAN AND ANR. S. N. BHAT

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:32:04

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 103: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Land Laws And Agricultural Tenancies - Matters relating to urban land ceiling

102 C.A. No. 5955/2015III

SWAYAM RELATORS BINDI GIRISH DAVE[P-1]

VersusTHE APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR INDUSTRIAL ANDFINANCIAL RECONSTRUCTIONS AND ORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR[R-3],[R-10], PAREKH & CO.[R-5],MEERA MATHUR[R-7],SHISHIR DESHPANDE[R-8],SUCHITRA ATULCHITALE[R-9], ANILa SHRIVASTAV[R-13]

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:32:11

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 104: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Service Matters - Recruitment/Transfer/Compassionate Appointment

103 C.A. No. 2813/2017XIV-A

CHANDER MOHAN NEGI AND ORS. PRASHANT BHUSHAN[P-1],[P-2], [P-4], SATISHKUMAR[P-3], [P-5], [P-6],[P-7], [P-8], [P-9], [P-10],[P-11], [P-12], [P-13]

VersusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ORS. ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1],

[R-2], AMITA SINGHKALKAL[R-3]ABHISHEK GUPTA[IMPL],KRISHAN SINGHCHAUHAN[IMPL]SANJEEV MALHOTRA[INT]

[ RETAIN ITS POSITION ]IA No. 67149/2019 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTIONIA No. 47819/2018 - INTERVENTIONAPPLICATIONIA No. 151605/2019 - INTERVENTIONAPPLICATIONIA No. 54096/2018 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENTIA No. 151609/2019 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

103.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 2814/2017XIV-A

RAJESH THAKUR AND ORS. PRASHANT BHUSHAN[P-1],[P-2], [P-3]

VersusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ORS. ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1],

[R-2], [R-3], VARINDERKUMAR SHARMA[R-4],VIKRANT SINGH BAIS[R-5],ANURADHA MUTATKAR[R-6],[R-7]

FOR impleading party ON IA 150731/2019FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA150731/2019IA No. 150731/2019 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

Page 105: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 12

103.2

ConnectedC.A. No. 2815/2017XIV-A

KUSHAL KUMARI AND ANR. PRASHANT BHUSHAN[P-1],[P-2]

VersusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ORS. ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1],

[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], VARINDERKUMAR SHARMA[R-5],DEVENDRA SINGH[R-7],ANURADHA MUTATKAR[R-8]

Criminal Matters - Matters relating to harassment, cruelty to woman for dowry, dowrydeath, eveteasing, domestic violence etc.

104 Crl.A. No. 1753/2019II

SHAIK MUKTHAR AND ANR. MANOJ C. MISHRA

VersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH NOW STATE OFTELANGANA

S.. UDAYA KUMARSAGAR[R-1]

IA No. 170640/2019 - GRANT OF BAIL

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:32:16

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 106: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Criminal Matters - Others

105 Crl.A. No. 613/2016II

ADUKKALPATTU MANI ABHIJIT SENGUPTA

VersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANR. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR[R-1]

105.1

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1818/2014II

ADUKKALPATTU MANI ABHIJIT SENGUPTA

VersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH GUNTUR PRABHAKARREADY

Matters Relating To Consumer Protection - SLPs relating to Consumer Protection.

106 C.A. No. 8879/2014XVII-A

R. KAMALAKANNAN T. R. B. SIVAKUMAR

VersusBRANCH MANAGER, SHRIRAM TRANSPORTFINANCE CO. LTD

MOMOTA DEVI OINAM

Criminal Matters - Others

107 Crl.A. No. 2452/2014II-C

INAL YADAV @ SHYAM SUNDER (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

Criminal Matters - Criminal matters in which sentence awarded is up to five years

108 Crl.A. No. 1126/2015II

SRI SWAPAN KR. DATTA RAJAN K. CHOURASIA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF TRIPURA SHUVODEEP ROY[R-1]

Page 107: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 12

Labour Matters - Other matters under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

109 C.A. No. 3299/2017III

M/S UNITED WHITE METALS LTD DILIP ANNASAHEB TAUR

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA STATE OFMAHARASHTRA . AND ORS.

P. V. DINESH, NISHANTRAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR, MUKTICHOWDHARY, DR. R.R.DESHPANDE ANDASSOCIATES[R-5]

109.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 3351/2017III

OTIS ELEVATOR CO. (I) LTD MUKTI CHOWDHARY

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA MINISTRY OFLABOUR AND INDUSTRIAL DEPARTMENT AND ORS.

NISHANT RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR, , P. V.DINESH, DILIP ANNASAHEBTAUR, DR. R.R. DESHPANDEAND ASSOCIATES[R-5]

Criminal Matters - Others

110 Crl.A. No. 93/2015II-C

TARANDAS SATNAMI(IN JAIL) AND ANR. RUNAMONI BHUYAN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUMEER SODHI[R-1]IA No. 20724/2014 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 165601/2018 - GRANT OF BAILIA No. 165589/2018 - GRANT OF BAILIA No. 20725/2014 - GRANT OF BAIL

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:32:21

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 108: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEERHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Service Matters - Retiral benefits

101 C.A. No. 8942/2013III

STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ANR. A. V. RANGAM[P-1]

VersusNATVARLAL L BHATTI RAVI PANWAR[R-1]

101.1 ConnectedC.A. No. 8943/2013III

STATE BANK OF INDIA A. V. RANGAM[P-1]

VersusNATVARLAL L BHATTI RAVI PANWAR[R-1]

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:24:05

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 109: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEERHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Rent Act Matters - Others

102 C.A. No.7655-7656/2009IV-A

LAKSHMINARAYANA SONY AP & J CHAMBERS

VersusC. BASHA AND ANR. M. A. CHINNASAMY

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:24:30

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 110: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEERHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Ordinary Civil Matters - Matters relating to specific performance of contract

103 C.A. No. 9833/2014XVI

INDIRA DEVI FARRUKH RASHEED

VersusVEENA GUPTA AND ORS. YADAV NARENDER SINGH,

RAHUL PRATAPLIST I.A. NO. 97775/2018 FOR DIRECTIONALONGWITH CIVIL APPEAL IN THE SECONDWEEK OF JANUARY 2019 VIDE COURT'S ORDERDATED 1-10-2018.IA No. 97775/2018 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION

Personal Law Matters - Matters relating to partition

104 C.A. No. 6260/2019XIV-A

ROSHAN LAL . AND ORS. AVADH BIHARIKAUSHIK[P-1]

VersusROOP SINGH EQUITY LEX

ASSOCIATES[R-1]

Service Matters - Condition of service

105 C.A. No. 3414/2017IV-A

RANGNATH NOURANGE T. MAHIPAL

VersusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ORS. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE,

AKSHAT SHRIVASTAVAIA No. 6/2015 - VACATING STAY

105.1

ConnectedC.A. No. 3415/2017IV-A

M.L. SAHU NITIN BHARDWAJ

VersusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND ORS. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEEFOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 165008/2018FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA165013/2018

Page 111: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 13

IA No. 165013/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILINGO.T.IA No. 165008/2018 - STAY APPLICATION

Ordinary Civil Matters - Others

106 C.A. No. 3769/2017IV

NEW BEACH CANDY HEALTH CARE PVT. LTD. ASHOK K. MAHAJAN

VersusUNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARHADMINISTRATION, CHANDIGARH THROUGH CHIEFADMINISTRATOR AND ANR.

ANIL K. CHOPRA

HEARING OF APPEAL IS EXPEDITED VIDE CT'SORDER DATED 21.10.2019

Land Laws And Agricultural Tenancies - Others

107 C.A. No.11418-11419/2018IV

AJIT SINGH MERUSAGARSAMANTARAY[P-1]

VersusJOINT DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB .AND ORS.

RANJEETA ROHATGI[R-1],ARCHANA PATHAKDAVE[R-1]

Personal Law Matters - Matters relating to partition

108 C.A. No.3581-3582/2017XII

JAYARAMAN VIJAY KUMAR[P-1]

VersusCHELLAMMAL . AND ORS. BALAJI SRINIVASAN[R-1]As per court's order dated 8.4.2019, list thematter in the month of October, 2019.

Ordinary Civil Matters - Others

109 C.A. No. 10069/2018XV

B.S. RATHORE CHANDRA PRAKASH

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1], [R-2],

[R-3]List the matter in the month of January, 2020,before the appropriate Bench.

State Excise-Trading In Liquor-Privileges, Licences-distilleries Breweries - State Excise-Trading In Liquor-Privileges, Licencesdistilleries Breweries

110 C.A. No. 7475/2019XI-A

THE STATE OF ODISHA AND ORS. RAVI PRAKASH MEHROTRA

VersusM/S ANHEUSER BUSCH INBEV INDIA LTD. ANDANR.

SHOVAN MISHRA[CAVEAT]

FOR FINAL HEARING

Page 112: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:24:46

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 113: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 14

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Ordinary Civil Matters - Original Civil Suit under Article 131 of the Constitution of India

101 ORGNL.SUIT No.2/1996XVII-A

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH ABHINAV MUKERJI[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA KAMINI JAISWAL[R-1],

HARINDER MOHANSINGH[R-1], GURMEETSINGH MAKKER[R-1], ANISHKUMAR GUPTA[R-3]

[ PART-HEARD BY HON. INDIRA BANERJEE ANDHON. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, JJ. ]

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:44:33

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 114: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 14

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Land Acquisition & Requisition Matters - Matters challenging compensations

102 C.A. No. 2644/2016III

LOONKARAN GANDHI(D) TR.LR. MRS SHAMABHIWAPURKAR

RAMESHWAR PRASADGOYAL

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ORS. ANAGHA S. DESAI, NISHANT

RAMAKANTRAOKATNESHWARKAR

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:44:41

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 115: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 14

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Arbitration Matters - SLPs challenging Arbitration Matters

103 C.A. No. 6797/2008X

M/S LAXMI CONTINENTAL CONSTRN.COMPANY MUKESH KUMARSHARMA[P-1][PR]

VersusSTATE OF U.P. KAMLENDRA

MISHRA[R-1][GR]

Land Acquisition & Requisition Matters - Matters challenging compensations

104 C.A. No. 5678/2010IX

ASHOKKUMAR CHAGANLAL JAIPURIA AND ANRAND ANR.

ANAGHA S. DESAI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. AND ORS. SACHIN PATIL[R-1]

Matters Relating To Consumer Protection - SLPs relating to Consumer Protection.

105 C.A. No.6076-6077/2011XVII-A

M/S BALAJI COLD STORAGE P.LTD.. AND ANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusRAM DHYAN CHAUDHARY @ RAMDHYAN YADAV

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:44:46

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 116: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 14

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Ordinary Civil Matters - Others

106 C.A. No.8885-8886/2012IV-A

KAMLESH PURI DIVYAKANT LAHOTI[P-1]

VersusHARI SINGH AND ORS. PUNEET TANEJA, SURYA

KANT, DHARMENDRAKUMAR SINHA

Matters Relating To Consumer Protection - SLPs relating to Consumer Protection.

107 C.A. No.4412-4413/2010XVII-A

M/S. ASSOCIATED ROAD CARRIERS LTD. VIJAY K. JAIN[P-1]

VersusM/S. KAMLENDER KASHYAP AND ORS. ANIS AHMED KHAN[R-1],

SUDARSHAN SINGHRAWAT[R-2]

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:44:51

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 117: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES

ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERSLISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]

DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 30-01-2020COURT NO. : 14

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

(TIME : 10:30 AM)

NOTE :Chronology is based on the date of initial filing.

REGULAR HEARING

SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/RespondentAdvocate

Ordinary Civil Matters - Others

108 C.A. No. 4949/2009XII

SRI PAMBAN KUMARAGURUPARASWAMY TEMPLE SHOBHA RAMAMOORTHY

VersusK.SUBRAMANYA MUDLIAR(D) THR.LRS.. AND ORS. R. AYYAM PERUMALIA No. 130079/2019 -INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT

Land Acquisition & Requisition Matters - Acquisition for Defence purpose

109 C.A. No. 1460/2010IV-A

B.K. RAVICHANDRA AND ORS. KSN & CO.[P-2], [P-3], [P-4],[P-5]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-2],

ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-3]

Land Acquisition & Requisition Matters - Matters challenging compensations

110 C.A. No. 2684/2010III-A

KAFEEL AHMAD (D) THR. LR. MOHD. IRSHAD HANIF[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF U.P. THROUGH COLLECTOR AND ORS. TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1],

[R-2], PRADEEP MISRA[R-3]

NEW DELHI29-01-2020 17:44:56

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR

Page 118: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON RECORD DO NOT …SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL