85
SURVEYCONDUCTED BYTRAI TOASSESS QOS PROVIDED BYTELECOM SERVICES PROVIDERS SUMMARISED RESULTS: October 2003–December 2003 TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA

SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY TELECOM SERVICES PROVIDERS

SUMMARISED RESULTS: October 2003–December 2003

TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA

Page 2: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA

April , 2004, NEW DELHI

Page 3: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

13

INTRODUCTION

1.1. In exercise of the powers vested in the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) under the TRAI Act, 1997, the Authority has been conducting periodical survey of the quality of basic and cellular telephone services provided by different telecommunication service providers all over the country. The survey also covers an assessment of the level of satisfaction with the services received by subscribers of these telephone service providers. The survey, spread over 14 months from November 2003 to December 2004 covers a performance period of one year from October 2003 to September 2004. M/s. IMRB International, the authorised survey agency, is to submit four quarterly reports at the end of each quarter and one annual report at the end of the survey.

1.2. The study is being conducted broadly in two modules. They are:

(1) Objective assessment: To assess the quality of service of telecom operators by auditing the service level records maintained by the operators, conducting drive tests as well as live measurements and comparing them with quality of service benchmarks stipulated by TRAI

(2) Subjective survey: To obtain subscriber feedback on quality of services by way of primary survey

1.3. The following pages present a summary of Quarter 1 (Oct-Dec. 2003) findings from

the audit and primary survey work undertaken by IMRB International during the period November 2003 - January 2004. The audit was conducted for the month of October 2003.

1.4. To verify the accuracy and authenticity of QoS performance monitoring reports submitted to TRAI by the various operators, IMRB’s officials visited 466 basic telephone exchanges while auditing 34 basic operators. 110 urban and 356 rural exchanges were covered as part of the basic telecom service operators. Further, the operations of 70 GSM and 25 CDMA operators were audited as part of this exercise. In the case of basic operators, a sample mix of urban and rural exchanges (that are representative of the circle) was selected across 10% of SDCAs (Short Distance Charging Area) of operator. Also, for basic operators, the exchanges were selected on basis of their equipped capacity (large, medium and small). All GSM and CDMA operators in the country were covered during the exercise. During this visit IMRB officials verified and validated the source data used by the operators for calculation of QoS parameters, collected supporting documents, made live measurements and recorded observations, if any.

1.5. In the subjective assessment of the QoS, a large sample of 24,208 basic, 12,912

cellular and 4,929 CDMA service subscribers were met to assess their satisfaction levels with the quality of the services that were delivered by the telecom services providers.

Page 4: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

13

Overall perform

ance of Basic service operators

on some selected service param

eters

Annex-I

PERC

ENTA

GE O

F NEW

CO

NN

ECTIO

NS PR

OV

IDED

WITH

IN 7 D

AY

S Prescribed Q

oS Standard: 100% w

ithin 7 days Oct 03-D

ec 03

64%

90%

34%

54%

38%

53%

80%

72%

39%

74%

57%

65%

33%

48%

70%

22%27%

20%

90%

53%

94%

19%

75%

38%

55%

35%

15%

58%

30%

4%

51%

8%

33%

52%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

10

0%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Chennai - BSNL

Delhi - MTNL

Kolkata - BSNL

Mumbai – MTNL

Delhi – Touchtel

AP - BSNL

AP-TATA TELE

Gujrat – BSNL

MH - BSNL

MH - TATA TELE

TN - BSNL

Karnataka - BSNL

Karntaka - Touchtel

Haryana - BSNL

Haryana - Touchtel

Kerala - BSNL

MP - BSNL

Chhattisgarh - BSNL

MP - Touchtel

Punjab - BSNL

Punjab - HFCL

Rajasthan - BSNL

Rajasthan - STL

UP (E) - BSNL

UP (W) – BSNL

Uttaranchal - BSNL

WB – BSNL

Assam - BSNL

Bihar - BSNL

Jharkhand - BSNL

HP- BSNL

J&K - BSNL

NE - BSNL

Orissa - BSNL

Page 5: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

14

`Annex-II

CU

STOM

ER C

OM

PLAIN

TS OF PH

ON

E FAU

LT (NO

. OF FA

ULTS PER

100 SUB

SCR

IBER

S PER M

ON

TH)

Oct 03-D

ec 03 Prescribed Q

oS Standard: <3 faults per 100 subscribers

6

2527

6.8

1.8

15

2

1114

68

10

2.9

15

7

13

41

18.2

2.5

21

6

23

2

13.115

7.1

22.3

15

3127

96

2017

30

0 10 20 30 40 50Chennai - BSNL

Delhi - MTNL

Kolkata - BSNL

Mumbai – MTNL

Delhi – Touchtel

AP - BSNL

AP-TATA TELE

Gujrat – BSNL

MH - BSNL

MH - TATA TELE

TN - BSNL

Karnataka - BSNL

Karntaka - Touchtel

Hary - BSNL

Hary-Touchtel

Kerala - BSNL

MP - BSNL

Chhatti- BSNL

MP – Tou-chtel

Punjab - BSNL

Punjab - HFCL

Rajasthan - BSNL

Rajasthan - STL

UP (E) - BSNL

UP (W) – BSNL

Uttar-anchal - BSNL

WB – BSNL

Assam - BSNL

Bihar - BSNL

Jharkhand - BSNL

HP- BSNL

J&K - BSNL

NE - BSNL

Orissa - BSNL

Page 6: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

15

Annex-III

PERC

ENTA

GE O

FCU

STOM

ER FA

ULT C

OM

PLAIN

TS REPA

IRED

BY

NEX

T WO

RK

ING

DA

Y

Oct. ’03-D

ec.’03 Prescribed Q

oS Standard: > 90% by next w

orking day

62%49%44% 72% 99%61% 96%71%59% 100%84% 87% 99%61% 99%78%41% 63% 97%52% 99%49% 97%46% 86% 90%32% 100%27%

8%

93%45% 100%73%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Chennai - BSNL

Delhi - MTNLKolkata - BSNL

Mumbai – MTNL

Delhi – TouchtelAP - BSNL

AP-TATA TELEGujrat – BSNL

MH - BSNL

MH - TATA TELETN - BSNL

Karnataka - BSNLKarntaka - Touchtel

Haryana - BSNL

Haryana - TouchtelKerala - BSNL

MP - BSNLChhattisgarh - BSNL

MP - TouchtelPunjab - BSNL

Punjab - HFCL

Rajasthan - BSNLRajasthan - STL

UP (E) - BSNLUP (W) – BSNL

Uttaranchal - BSNLWB – BSNL

Assam - BSNL

Bihar - BSNLJharkhand - BSNL

HP- BSNL

J&K - BSNLNE - BSNL

Orissa - BSNL

Page 7: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

16

Annex-IV

A

VER

AG

E TIME (H

OU

RS) TA

KEN

TO A

TTEND

THE C

USTO

MER

FAU

LT CO

MPLA

INTS

Oct.’03-D

ec.’03 Prescribed Q

oS Standard: < 8 Hours

14

16

18

15

5

15

6

1415

1110

8

5

16

5

1616

12

6

18

6

20

7

18

1011

9

16

2023

7

2019

17

8.008.00

8.008.00

8.008.00

8.008.00

8.008.00

8.008.00

8.008.00

8.008.00

8.008.00

8.008.00

8.008.00

8.008.00

8.008.00

8.008.00

8.008.00

8.008.00

8.008.00

0.00

5.00

10.00

15.00

20.00

Chennai - BSNL

Delhi - MTNL

Kolkata - BSNL

Mumbai – MTNL

Delhi – Touchtel

AP - BSNL

AP-TATA TELE

Gujrat – BSNL

MH - BSNL

MH - TATA TELE

TN - BSNL

Karnataka - BSNL

Karntaka - Touchtel

Haryana - BSNL

Haryana - Touchtel

Kerala - BSNL

MP - BSNL

Chhattisgarh - BSNL

MP - Touchtel

Punjab - BSNL

Punjab - HFCL

Rajasthan - BSNL

Rajasthan - STL

UP (E) - BSNL

UP (W) – BSNL

Uttaranchal - BSNL

WB – BSNL

Assam - BSNL

Bihar - BSNL

Jharkhand - BSNL

HP- BSNL

J&K - BSNL

NE - BSNL

Orissa - BSNL

Page 8: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

17

Annex-V

PER

CEN

TAG

E OF TELEPH

ON

E SHIFTIN

G C

OM

PLETED W

ITHIN

3 DA

YS

Oct.’03-D

ec.’03 Prescribed Q

oS Standard: 100%

25%

80%

25%

12%

20%

34%35%

49%

29%

64%

42%

54%

2%

58%

15%

24%

12%

22%

41%36%

43%

15%

95%

45%

53%

40%33%

69%

45%

63%58%

0%

54%

70%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

10

0.0

0%

0.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

80.00%

100.00%

Chennai - BSNL

Delhi - MTNL

Kolkata - BSNL

Mumbai – MTNL

Delhi – Touchtel

AP - BSNL

AP-TATA TELE

Gujrat – BSNL

MH - BSNL

MH - TATA TELE

TN - BSNL

Karnataka - BSNL

Karntaka - Touchtel

Haryana - BSNL

Haryana - Touchtel

Kerala - BSNL

MP - BSNL

Chhattisgarh - BSNL

MP - Touchtel

Punjab - BSNL

Punjab - HFCL

Rajasthan - BSNL

Rajasthan - STL

UP (E) - BSNL

UP (W) – BSNL

Uttaranchal - BSNL

WB – BSNL

Assam - BSNL

Bihar - BSNL

Jharkhand - BSNL

HP- BSNL

J&K - BSNL

NE - BSNL

Orissa - BSNL

Page 9: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

18

Annex-V

I PER

CEN

TAG

E OF C

LOU

SERS IN

24 HO

UR

S O

ct.’03-Dec.’03

Prescribed QoS Standard: 95%

within 24 H

ours

52%

97%

59%

13%

46%

70%

0%

92%

41%

16%

71%68% 100%63%

59%

65%

5%9%

100%26%

92%

41% 100%80%

48%

29%25%

0%

52%

7%

0%

83%

94%100%

0.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

80.00%

100.00%

Chennai - BSNL

Delhi - MTNL

Kolkata - BSNL

Mumbai – MTNL

Delhi – Touchtel

AP - BSNL

AP-TATA TELE

Gujrat – BSNL

MH - BSNL

MH - TATA TELE

TN - BSNL

Karnataka - BSNL

Karntaka - Touchtel

Haryana - BSNL

Haryana - Touchtel

Kerala - BSNL

MP - BSNL

Chhattisgarh - BSNL

MP - Touchtel

Punjab - BSNL

Punjab - HFCL

Rajasthan - BSNL

Rajasthan - STL

UP (E) - BSNL

UP (W) – BSNL

Uttaranchal - BSNL

WB – BSNL

Assam - BSNL

Bihar - BSNL

Jharkhand - BSNL

HP- BSNL

J&K - BSNL

NE - BSNL

Orissa - BSNL

Page 10: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

19

Annex-V

II O

PERA

TOR

SERV

ICE R

ESPON

SE LEVEL (%

AG

E OF C

USTO

MER

CA

LLS RESPO

ND

ED IN

10 SEC.)

Oct.’03-D

ec.’03 Prescribed Q

oS Standard: At least 95%

answered w

ithin 10 Sec.

0

99%

75%

0

75%

91%

0

78%

98%

0

84%

96%

0

0

75%

89%

0

0%

0%

96%

0

88%

0

89%

0

0

52%

0%

22%

26%

82%

94%

0

0

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Chennai - BSNL

Delhi - MTNL

Kolkata - BSNL

Mumbai – MTNL

Delhi – Touchtel

AP - BSNL

AP-TATA TELE

Gujrat – BSNL

MH - BSNL

MH - TATA TELE

TN - BSNL

Karnataka - BSNL

Karntaka - Touchtel

Har - BSNL

Hary-Touchtel

Kerala - BSNL

MP - BSNL

Chhatti- BSNL

MP - Touchtel

Punjab - BSNL

Punjab - HFCL

Rajasthan - BSNL

Rajasthan - STL

UP (E) - BSNL

UP (W) – BSNL

Uttaranchal - BSNL

WB – BSNL

Assam - BSNL

Bihar - BSNL

Jharkhand - BSNL

HP- BSNL

J&K - BSNL

NE - BSNL

Orissa - BSNL

Page 11: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

20

Please note: those marked 0 above have not reported the data.

Annex-VIII BILLING DISPUTES COMPLAINTS FROM CUSTOMERS (%AGE OF TOTAL BILLS ISSUED IN THE PERIOD)

Oct.’03-Dec.’03 Prescribed QoS Standard: <0.10% of bills generated

Billing dispute complents by customers (%age of total bills generated in the period)

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

Page 12: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

21

A

nnex-IX

CU

STOM

ER SU

RV

EY SC

OR

ES ON

SERV

ICE PR

OV

ISION

– BA

SIC SER

VIC

ES O

ct.’03- Dec.’03

Prescribed QoS standard: > 95%

score

92%

83%

87%

80%

94%

86%

90%

95%

92%

96%

79%

78%

82%

92%

92%

98%

49%

95%

69%

83%

78%

87%

82%

88%

64%

91%

68%

68%

77%

67%

55%

54%

59%

66%

51%

75%

72%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%Chennai-BSNL

Kolkata-BSNL

Delhi-TTL

Delhi-MTNL

Delhi-Touchtel

Mumbai-MTNL

A P -BSNL

A P -TTL

Gujarat-BSNL

Gujarat-TTL

Karnataka-BSNL

Karnataka-Touchtel

MH-BSNL

MH - TTL

T N-BSNL

T N-Touchtel

Har. BSNL

Har. Touchtel

Kerala-BSNL

M. P. BSNL

M.P. Touchtel

Chattisgarh-BSNL

Punjab-BSNL

Punjab-Connect

Raj BSNL

Raj Rainbow

UP(E)-BSNL

UP(W)-BSNL

Uttranchal-BSNL

WB BSNL

Assam-BSNL

Bihar- BSNL

Jharkhand- BSNL

HP-BSNL

J&K-BSNL

N E -BSNL

Orrisa-BSNL

Page 13: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

22

Annex-X

C

USTO

MER

SCO

RES O

N SA

TTISFAC

TION

WITH

NETW

OR

K PER

FOR

MA

NC

E, RELIA

BILITY

AN

D A

VA

ILAB

LILITY – B

ASIC

SER

VIC

ES O

ct.’03-Dec.’03

Prescribed Q

oS Standard: > 95% scores

90%

82%

88%

83%

93%

85%

86%

94%

91%

95%

86%

77%

90%

93%

88%

94%

77%

92%

78%

83%

82%

92%

86%

89%

80%

86%

88%

83%

85%

75%

70%

68%

73%

79%

75%

79%

76%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Chennai-BSNL

Kolkata-BSNL

Delhi-TTL

Delhi-MTNL

Delhi-Touchtel

Mumbai-MTNL

A P -BSNL

A P -TTL

Gujarat-BSNL

Gujarat-TTL

Karnataka-BSNL

Karnataka-Touchtel

MH-BSNL

MH - TTL

T N-BSNL

T N-Touchtel

Har. BSNL

Har. Touchtel

Kerala-BSNL

M. P. BSNL

M.P. Touchtel

Chattisgarh-BSNL

Punjab-BSNL

Punjab-Connect

Raj BSNL

Raj Rainbow

UP(E)-BSNL

UP(W)-BSNL

Uttranchal-BSNL

WB BSNL

Assam-BSNL

Bihar- BSNL

Jharkhand- BSNL

HP-BSNL

J&K-BSNL

N E -BSNL

Orrisa-BSNL

Page 14: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

23

Annex-X

I C

USTO

MER

SUR

VEY

SCO

RES O

N SA

TISFAC

TION

WITH

MA

INTA

INA

BILITY

– BA

SIC SER

VIC

ES O

ct.’03-Dec.’03

Prescribed QoS Standard: > 95%

scores

86%

74%

82%

77%

91%

84%

75%

71%

92%

81%

82%

72%

83%

85%

85%

77%

69%

90%

72%

68%

80%

86%

82%

82%

72%

81%

65%

66%

72%

75%

71%

69%

64%

68%

63%

78%

77%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Chennai-BSNL

Kolkata-BSNL

Delhi-TTL

Delhi-MTNL

Delhi-Touchtel

Mumbai-MTNL

A P -BSNL

A P -TTL

Gujarat-BSNL

Gujarat-TTL

Karnataka-BSNL

Karnataka-Touchtel

MH-BSNL

MH - TTL

T N-BSNL

T N-Touchtel

Har. BSNL

Har. Touchtel

Kerala-BSNL

M. P. BSNL

M.P. Touchtel

Chattisgarh-BSNL

Punjab-BSNL

Punjab-Connect

Raj BSNL

Raj Rainbow

UP(E)-BSNL

UP(W)-BSNL

Uttranchal-BSNL

WB BSNL

Assam-BSNL

Bihar- BSNL

Jharkhand- BSNL

HP-BSNL

J&K-BSNL

N E -BSNL

Orrisa-BSNL

Page 15: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

24

Annex-X

II C

USTO

MER

SUR

VEY

SCO

RES O

N SA

TISFAC

TION

WITH

HELP SER

VIC

ES - BA

SIC SER

VIC

ES O

ct.’03-Dec.’03

Prescribed QoS Standard: > 90%

scores

87%

78%

84%

82%

92%

81%

82%

91%

91%

96%

85%

71%

85%

88%

89%

89%

75%

91%

80%

79%

84%

85%

89%

89%

78%

86%

76%

72%

79%

77%

72%

68%

73%

72%

75%

79%

83%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Chennai-BSNL

Kolkata-BSNL

Delhi-TTL

Delhi-MTNL

Delhi-Touchtel

Mumbai-MTNL

A P -BSNL

A P -TTL

Gujarat-BSNL

Gujarat-TTL

Karnataka-BSNL

Karnataka-Touchtel

MH-BSNL

MH - TTL

T N-BSNL

T N-Touchtel

Har. BSNL

Har. Touchtel

Kerala-BSNL

M. P. BSNL

M.P. Touchtel

Chattisgarh-BSNL

Punjab-BSNL

Punjab-Connect

Raj BSNL

Raj Rainbow

UP(E)-BSNL

UP(W)-BSNL

Uttranchal-BSNL

WB BSNL

Assam-BSNL

Bihar- BSNL

Jharkhand- BSNL

HP-BSNL

J&K-BSNL

N E -BSNL

Orrisa-BSNL

Page 16: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

25

Annex-X

III C

USTO

MER

SUR

VEY

SCO

RES O

N SA

TISFAC

TION

WITH

BILLIN

G – B

ASIC

SERV

ICES

Oct.’03-D

ec.’03 Prescribed Q

oS Standard: > 90% scores

84%

66%

77%

83%

87%

81%

80%

86%

91%

82%

82%

65%

89%

91%

79%

85%

79%

87%

82%

81%

82%

84%

82%

92%

83%

88%

76%

86%

81%

76%

68%

62%

55%

64%

77%

74%

67%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%90%

90%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Chennai-BSNL

Kolkata-BSNL

Delhi-TTL

Delhi-MTNL

Delhi-Touchtel

Mumbai-MTNL

A P -BSNL

A P -TTL

Gujarat-BSNL

Gujarat-TTL

Karnataka-BSNL

Karnataka-Touchtel

MH-BSNL

MH - TTL

T N-BSNL

T N-Touchtel

Har. BSNL

Har. Touchtel

Kerala-BSNL

M. P. BSNL

M.P. Touchtel

Chattisgarh-BSNL

Punjab-BSNL

Punjab-Connect

Raj BSNL

Raj Rainbow

UP(E)-BSNL

UP(W)-BSNL

Uttranchal-BSNL

WB BSNL

Assam-BSNL

Bihar- BSNL

Jharkhand- BSNL

HP-BSNL

J&K-BSNL

N E -BSNL

Orrisa-BSNL

Page 17: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

26

Annex-X

IV

CU

STOM

ER SU

RV

EY SC

OR

ES ON

SATISFA

CTIO

N W

ITH SU

PPLEMEN

TAR

Y SER

VIC

ES - BA

SIC SER

VIC

E Oct.’03-D

ec.’03

Prescribed QoS Standard: > 95%

scores

84%

86%

89%

85%

93%

86%

92%

94%

94%

90%

87%

73%

93%

92%

83%

100%

89%

85%

81%

84%

88%

80%

95%

73%

80%

96%

86%

87%

90%

87%

67%

79%

67%

80%

71%

77%

93%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%95%

95%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Chennai-BSNL

Kolkata-BSNL

Delhi-TTL

Delhi-MTNL

Delhi-Touchtel

Mumbai-MTNL

A P -BSNL

A P -TTL

Gujarat-BSNL

Gujarat-TTL

Karnataka-BSNL

Karnataka-Touchtel

MH-BSNL

MH - TTL

T N-BSNL

T N-Touchtel

Har. BSNL

Har. Touchtel

Kerala-BSNL

M. P. BSNL

M.P. Touchtel

Chattisgarh-BSNL

Punjab-BSNL

Punjab-Connect

Raj BSNL

Raj Rainbow

UP(E)-BSNL

UP(W)-BSNL

Uttranchal-BSNL

WB BSNL

Assam-BSNL

Bihar- BSNL

Jharkhand- BSNL

HP-BSNL

J&K-BSNL

N E -BSNL

Orrisa-BSNL

Page 18: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

27

Annex-X

V

CU

STO

ME

R SU

RV

EY

SCO

RE

S ON

SAT

ISFAC

TIO

N W

ITH

OV

ER

AL

L SE

RV

ICE

– BA

SIC SE

RV

ICE

Oct.’03-D

ec.’03 Prescribed Q

oS Standard: > 95% score

89%

77%

82%

78%

90%

84%

85%

91%

91%

81%

82%

72%

89%

92%

86%

86%

75%

88%

76%

85%

83%

86%

80%

83%

79%

79%

73%

74%

76%

77%

60%

72%

71%

67%

65%

77%

79%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%9

5%

95

%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Chennai-BSNL

Kolkata-BSNL

Delhi-TTL

Delhi-MTNL

Delhi-Touchtel

Mumbai-MTNL

A P -BSNL

A P -TTL

Gujarat-BSNL

Gujarat-TTL

Karnataka-BSNL

Karnataka-Touchtel

MH-BSNL

MH - TTL

T N-BSNL

T N-Touchtel

Har. BSNL

Har. Touchtel

Kerala-BSNL

M. P. BSNL

M.P. Touchtel

Chattisgarh-BSNL

Punjab-BSNL

Punjab-Connect

Raj BSNL

Raj Rainbow

UP(E)-BSNL

UP(W)-BSNL

Uttranchal-BSNL

WB BSNL

Assam-BSNL

Bihar- BSNL

Jharkhand- BSNL

HP-BSNL

J&K-BSNL

N E -BSNL

Orrisa-BSNL

Page 19: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

28

SUMMARY OF BASIC SERVICES QOS AUDIT Annex-XVI

Metro Circle Basic Services Operators Oct.’03-Dec.’03

A.3.1 METRO

Parameters Long Term Benchmarks Chennai - BSNL Delhi - MTNL Kolkata - BSNL Mumbai – MTNL Delhi –

Touchtel

New connections after registration of demand in less than 7 days =100% 64% 90% 34% 54% 38%

Fault incidences per 100subcribers/mnth) < 3 6 25 27 6.8 1.8

Fault repair by next working day >90% 62% 49% 44% 72% 99% Mean Time to Repair (MTTR) <8 hrs 13.78 15.79 18.05 14.94 5.07 Grade of service (calls blocked per thousand attempts) a) Junction between local exchange < 0.002 0.09 0.002 0.01 0.28 0.001 b) Outgoing Junction from TAX to Local < 0.005 NR NR NR NR NR c) Incoming junction from local to TAX < 0.005 NR 0.001 0.004 0.36 NR d) Incoming/outgoing junction of TAX’s < 0.005 NR NR NR NR NR Call completion rate in local network >65% 54% 65% 62% 97% 59% Metering & billing credibility- % of bills disputed <0.10% 0.14% 0.15% 0.23% 0.29% 2.05%

Operator Assisted Trunk calls (% answered within time norm) Urgent calls: <1 hr = 100% 100% 98% 100% 100% NR Ordinary calls: <2 hr = 100% 100% 93% 100% NR 100% Response to operator assisted services (% answered in 10 sec. or three rings) > 95% NR 99% 75% NR 75%

Customer care promptness Request for Shifts within 3 days > 95% 25% 80% 25% 12% 20% Request for Closures in less than 24 hours > 95% 52% 97% 59% 13% 46%

Request for Additional facility within 24 hours > 95% 87% 97% 91% 83% 81%

Percentage of repeat faults within 30 days <1% 17% 6% 30% 2% 8%

Note: Highlighted boxes are those not meeting the TRAI long term benchmark norms

Page 20: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

29

SUMMARY OF BASIC SERVICES QOS AUDIT Annex-XVII

A Circle Basic Services Operators Oct.03- Dec 03

Parameters TRAI Benchmarks

AP - BSNL

AP-TATA TELE

Gujrat – BSNL

MH - BSNL

MH - TATA TELE

TN - BSNL

Karnataka - BSNL

Karnataka -

TouchtelNew connections after registration of demand in less than 7 days =100% 53% 80% 72% 39% 74% 57% 65% 33%

Fault incidences per 100subcribers/mnth) < 3 15 2 11 14 6 8 10 2.9 Fault repair by next working day >90% 61% 96% 71% 59% 100% 84% 87% 99% Mean Time to Repair (MTTR) <8 hrs 15 6 14 15 11 10 8 5 Grade of service (calls blocked per thousand attempts) a) Junction between local exchange < 0.002 0.002 0.001 NR 0.155 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.015 b) Outgoing Junc. from TAX to Local < 0.005 NR 0.003 NR 0.189 NR 0.032 NR NR c) Incoming junc. from local to TAX < 0.005 0.005 0.001 NR 0.162 0.001 0.011 0.003 NR d) Incoming/outgoing junc. of TAX’s < 0.005 0.002 NR NR NR NR 0.108 0.006 NR Call completion rate in local network > 65% 61% 60% 64% 60% 82% 61% 59% 64% Metering & billing credibility- % of bills disputed < 0.10% 0.13% 0.18% 0.13% 0.15% 2.74% 0.09% 0.10% 0.55%

Operator Assisted Trunk calls (% answered within time norm) Urgent calls: <1 hr = 100% 100% 93% 100% 100% 88% 99% 100% 100% Ordinary calls: <2 hr = 100% 100% 92% 100% 100% NR 100% 100% NR Response to operator assisted services (% answered in 10 sec. or three rings) > 95% 91% NR 78% 98% NR 84% 96% NR

Customer care promptness Request for Shifts within 3 days > 95% 34% 35% 49% 29% 64% 42% 54% 2%

Request for Closures in less than 24 hours > 95% 70% NR 92% 41% 16% 71% 68% 100%

Request for Additional facility within 24 hours > 95% 88% 52% 98% 97% 91% 72% 74% 92%

Percentage of repeat faults within 30 days <1% 10% 8% 4% 3% 9% 8% 12% 6% Note: Highlighted boxes are those not meeting the TRAI long term benchmark norms

Page 21: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

P

New connectof demand inFault incidenc100subcriberFault repair bMean Time toGrade of sera) Junction bb) Outgoing Jc) Incoming jd) Incoming/oCall completiMetering & bibills disputedOperator AsUrgent calls: Ordinary callsResponse to services (% athree rings) Customer caRequest for SRequest for Chours Request for A24 hours Percentage o30 days

30

SUMMARY OF BASIC SERVICES QOS AUDIT Annex-XIX

B Circle Basic Services Operators Oct.03- Dec 03

arameters TRAI

Bench-marks

Haryana –

BSNL

Haryana-

Touchtel

Kerala -BSNL

MP - BSNL

Chhattsgarh- BSNL

MP – Tou-chtel

Punjab - BSNL

Punjab - HFCL

Rajasthan - BSNL

Rajasthan - STL

UP (E) -BSNL

UP (W) – BSNL

Uttar-anchal - BSNL

WB – BSNL

ions after registration less than 7 days =100% 48% 70% 22% 27% 20% 90% 53% 94% 19% 75% 38% 55% 35% 15%

es per s/mnth) < 3 15 7 13 41 18.2 2.5 21 6 23 2 13.1 15 7.1 22.3

y next working day >90% 61% 99% 78% 41% 63% 97% 52% 99% 49% 97% 46% 86% 90% 32% Repair (MTTR) <8 hrs 16 5 16 16 12 6 18 6 20 7 18 10 11 9 vice (calls blocked per thousand attempts) etween local exchange < 0.002 NR 0.003 0.002 0.001 NR NR 0.458 NR 0.012 NR 0.003 NR NR NR unc. from TAX to Local < 0.005 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0.007 0.003 NR 0.061

unc. from local to TAX < 0.005 NR 0.002 0.01 NR NR NR 0.747 NR 0.002 NR NR NR NR NR utgoing junc. of TAX’s < 0.005 NR NR NR 0.008 NR NR NR NR 0.012 NR 0.003 0.029 NR NR

on rate in local network > 65% 60% 77% 63% 72% 67% 72% 51% 74% 53% NR 63% 46% 66% NR lling credibility- % of < 0.10% 0.23% 1.94% 0.08% 0.08% NR 0.16% 0.08% 0.02% 0.01% 0.08% 0.05% 0.03% 0.01% 0.07%

sisted Trunk calls (% answered within time norm) <1 hr = 100% NR NR 100% 81% 100% 100% 100% NR 100% NR 100% NR 100% NR : <2 hr = 100% NR 100% 100% 98% 100% NR 100% NR 99% 100% 100% NR 100% 100% operator assisted nswered in 10 sec. or > 95% NR 75% 89% NR 0% 0% 96% NR 88% NR 89% NR NR 52%

re promptness hifts within 3 days > 95% 58% 15% 24% 12% 22% 41% 36% 43% 15% 95.1% 45% 53% 40% 33% losures in less than 24 > 95% 63% 59% 65% 5% 9% 100% 26% 92% 41% 100% 80% 48% 29% 25%

dditional facility within > 95% 53% 80% 84% 10% NR 100% 91% NR 84% 98% 89% 95% 94% 83%

f repeat faults within <1% 4% 8% 7% 4% 8% 2% 4% 11% 17% 1% 2% NR NR 2%

Note: Highlighted boxes are those not meeting the TRAI long term benchmark norms

Page 22: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

31

SUMMARY OF BASIC SERVICES QOS AUDIT Annex-XX

C Circle Basic Services Operators Oct.03- Dec 03

Parameters Long Term Benchmarks

Assam - BSNL

Bihar - BSNL

Jharkhand - BSNL

HP- BSNL

J&K - BSNL

NE - BSNL

Orissa - BSNL

New connections after registration of demand in less than 7 days =100% 58% 30% 4% 51% 8% 33% 52%

Fault incidences per 100subcribers/mnth) < 3 15 31 27 96 20 17 30

Fault repair by next working day >90% 100% 27% 8% 93% 45% 100% 73% Mean Time to Repair (MTTR) <8 hrs 16 20 23 7 20 19 17 Grade of service (calls blocked per thousand attempts) a) Junction between local exchange < 0.002 0.091 NR NR 0.003 0.003 0.031 0.016 b) Outgoing Junc. from TAX to Local < 0.005 0.186 0.667 0.82 0.001 0.012 0.112 0.087 c) Incoming junc. from local to TAX < 0.005 0.344 0.025 0.641 0.017 NR 0.05 0.072 d) Incoming/outgoing junc. of TAX’s < 0.005 0.27 0.779 NR NR 0.028 0.005 NR Call completion rate in local network > 65% 86% NR NR 55% 50% 65% 56% Metering & billing credibility- % of bills disputed < 0.10% NR NR NR 0.40% 0.22% NR 0.24%

Operator Assisted Trunk calls (% answered within time norm) Urgent calls: <1 hr = 100% 100% 100% NR 95% 97% 77% 50% Ordinary calls: <2 hr = 100% 84% 100% NR 99% 99% 95% 70% Response to operator assisted services (% answered in 10 sec. or three rings) > 95% NR 22% 26% 82% 94% NR NR

Customer care promptness Request for Shifts within 3 days > 95% 69% 45% 63% 58% NR 54% 70% Request for Closures in less than 24 hours > 95% 100% NR 52% 7% NR 83% 94%

Request for Additional facility within 24 hours > 95% 86% 62% 25% 67% 98% 99% 77%

Percentage of repeat faults within 30 days <1% 5% 7% NR 8% 11% 7% 19%

Note: Highlighted boxes are those not meeting the TRAI long term benchmark norms

Page 23: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

32

Overall performance of Cellular service operators on some selected service parameters Annex-I

CUSTOMER REPORTED BILLING COMPLAINTS - METROS Prescribed QoS standard: <0.10% complaints per 100 bills generated

Billing Complaints per 100 bills issued - Metros

0.10% 0.07% 0.08%0.20%

0.10%

1.85%

0.17% 0.09%

0.93%

0.13%

3.31%

1.03%

0.16% 0.10%

0.62%

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%D

elhi

- B

harti

Del

hi -

Hut

ch

Del

hi -

MTN

L

Del

hi -

Idea

Mum

bai -

BP

L

Mum

bai -

Hut

ch

Mum

bai -

MTN

L

Mum

bai -

Bha

rti

Che

nnai

- R

PG

Che

nnai

- B

harti

Che

nnai

- H

utch

Che

nnai

- B

SN

L

Kol

kata

- B

harti

Kol

kata

- H

utch

Kol

kata

- B

SN

L

Page 24: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

33

CUSTOMER REPORTED BILLING COMPLAINTS – A CIRCLES Prescribed QoS standard: <0.10% complaints per 100 bills generated

Billing Complaints per 100 bills issued - A Circles

0.10% 0.10%0.90% 1.27%

0.06% 0.15% 0.09%1.16%

0.11% 0.24%

15.43%

2.36%

0.02% 0.10%

4.45%

1.63%

0.06% 0.37% 0.53% 0.12%0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

16.0%

18.0%

Mah

aras

htra

- B

PL

Mah

aras

htra

- Id

ea

Mah

aras

htra

- B

hart

Mah

aras

htra

-B

SN

L

Guj

arat

- Fa

scel

Guj

arat

- Id

ea

Guj

arat

- B

harti

Guj

arat

- B

SN

L

A.P

. - Id

ea

A.P

. - B

harti

A.P

. - H

utch

A.P

. - B

SN

L

Kar

nata

ka -

Bha

rti

Kar

nata

ka -

Spi

ce

Kar

nata

ka -

Hut

ch

Kar

nata

ka -

BS

NL

T.N

. - B

PL

T.N

. - A

ircel

T.N

. - B

SN

L

T.N

. - B

harti

Page 25: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

34

CU

STOM

ER R

EPOR

TED B

ILLING

CO

MPLA

INTS – B

CIR

CLES

Prescribed QoS standard: <0.10%

complaints per 100 bills generated

Billing C

omplaints per 100 bills issued - B

Circles

0.05%0.03%

0.22%

3.00%

0.02%0.09%

2.47%

0.21%0.03%

0.09%

0.54%0.42%

0.09%

1.24%

0.88%

0.21%0.03%

0.05%

0.51%

0.09%0.08%

0.91%

0.03%0.05%

NR

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%Kerala - Escotel

Kerala - BPL

Kerala - Bharti

Kerala - BSNL

Punjab - Spice

Punjab - Bharti

Punjab - BSNL

Haryana - Escotel

Haryana - Aircel

Haryana - Bharti

Haryana - BSNL

U.P.(W) - Escotel

U.P.(W) - Bharti

U.P.(W) - BSNL

U.P.(E) - Aircel

U.P.(E) - BSNL

Rajasthan - Aircel

Rajasthan -Hexacom

Rajasthan - BSNL

M.P. - Bharti

M.P. - Reliance

M.P. - Idea

M.P. - BSNL

W.B. & A&N -Reliance

W.B. & A&N -BSNL

Page 26: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

35

CUSTOMER REPORTED BILLING COMPLAINTS – C CIRCLES

Prescribed QoS standard: <0.10% complaints per 100 bills generated

Billing Complaints per 100 bills issued - C Circles

0.10%

0.66%

NRNRNRNRNRNRNRNR0.0%

0.1%

0.2%

0.3%

0.4%

0.5%

0.6%

0.7%H

.P. -

Bha

rti

H.P

. - R

elia

nce

H.P

. - B

SN

L

Bih

ar -

Rel

ianc

e

Bih

ar -

BS

NL

Oris

sa -

Rel

ianc

e

Oris

sa -

BS

NL

Ass

am -

Rel

ianc

e

N.E

. - R

elia

nce

J&K

- B

SN

L

Page 27: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

36

Annex-II

PERC

ENTA

GE O

F CA

LLS DR

OPPED

DU

RIN

G C

ON

VER

SATIO

N - M

ETRO

S

Oct 03-D

ec 03

Prescribed QoS Standard: < 3%

of total calls established

Call D

rop Rate - M

etros

2.1%

1.4%

1.6%

0.3%

1.9%

1.9%

1.4%

1.2%

1.3%

0.9%

0.9%

0.6%

1.4%

1.2%

1.2%

1.1%

1.6%

2.9%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

7.0%

3.5%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

6.7%

NR

0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8%

Delhi - Bharti

Delhi - Hutch

Delhi - MTNL

Delhi - Idea

Mumbai - BPL

Mumbai - Hutch

Mumbai - MTNL

Mumbai - Bharti

Chennai - RPG

Chennai - Bharti

Chennai - Hutch

Chennai - BSNL

Kolkata - Bharti

Kolkata - Hutch

Kolkata - BSNL

October A

udit Data

Live Drive tests (drive test w

as conducted on a selected route only)

Page 28: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

37

PER

CEN

TAG

E OF C

ALLS D

RO

PPED D

UR

ING

CO

NV

ERSA

TION

- A C

IRC

LES

Prescribed Q

oS Standard: < 3% of total calls established

Call D

rop Rate - A C

ircles1.5%

1.2%

1.4%

1.5%

0.9%

1.1%

1.1%

1.0%

1.8%

1.5%

1.2%

2.0%

1.5%

1.4%

0.9%

1.4%

1.2%

1.6%

1.6%

1.4%

0.0%

0.5%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

2.4%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

7.1%

0.0%

27.8%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

NR

0% 5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

Maharashtra - BPL

Maharashtra - Idea

Maharashtra -Bhart

Maharashtra -BSNL

Gujarat - Fascel

Gujarat - Idea

Gujarat - Bharti

Gujarat - BSNL

A.P. - Idea

A.P. - Bharti

A.P. - Hutch

A.P. - BSNL

Karnataka - Bharti

Karnataka - Spice

Karnataka - Hutch

Karnataka - BSNL

T.N. - BPL

T.N. - Aircel

T.N. - BSNL

T.N. - Bharti

October A

udit Data

Live Drive tests (drive test w

as conducted on a selected route only)

Page 29: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

38

A

nnex-III

Oct 03-D

ec 03 PER

CEN

TAG

E OF C

ALLS D

RO

PPED D

UR

ING

CO

NV

ERSA

TION

- B C

IRC

LES

Prescribed QoS Standard: < 3%

of total calls established

Call D

rop Rate - B

Circles

1.0%

1.1%

1.3%

1.6%

1.3%

1.6%

2.1%

0.9%

1.1%

1.8%

3.2%

1.3%

2.3%

2.6%

17.9%

1.2%

2.0%

0.9%

2.9%

1.2%

1.5%

2.8%

3.0%

1.9%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

1.9%

2.7%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

4.8%

0.0%

0.7%

0.0%

2.7%

3.3%

0.0%

0.0%

0.4%

18.2%

NR

NR

NR

0% 2% 4% 6% 8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

20%

Kerala - Escotel

Kerala - BPL

Kerala - Bharti

Kerala - BSNL

Punjab - Spice

Punjab - Bharti

Punjab - BSNL

Haryana - Escotel

Haryana - Aircel

Haryana - Bharti

Haryana - BSNL

U.P.(W) - Escotel

U.P.(W) - Bharti

U.P.(W) - BSNL

U.P.(E) - Aircel

U.P.(E) - BSNL

Rajasthan - Aircel

Rajasthan -Hexacom

Rajasthan - BSNL

M.P. - Bharti

M.P. - Reliance

M.P. - Idea

M.P. - BSNL

W.B. & A&N -Reliance

W.B. & A&N -BSNL

October A

udit Data

Live Drive tests (drive test w

as conducted on a selected route only)

Page 30: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

39

PERCENTAGE OF CALLS DROPPED DURING CONVERSATION - C CIRCLES

Prescribed QoS Standard: < 3% of total calls established

Call Drop Rate - C Circles

2.0% 2.

2%

3.7%

2.4%

3.2%

2.5%

5.8%

3.0%

1.2%

0.4%

0.0%

0.0%

1.5%

0.0%

1.0%

5.3%

0.0%

NR

NR

NR

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

H.P

. - B

harti

H.P

. - R

elia

nce

H.P

. - B

SN

L

Bih

ar -

Rel

ianc

e

Bih

ar -

BS

NL

Oris

sa -

Rel

ianc

e

Oris

sa -

BS

NL

Ass

am -

Rel

ianc

e

N.E

. - R

elia

nce

J&K

- B

SN

L

October Audit Data Live Drive tests (drive test was conducted on a selected route only)

Page 31: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

40

Annex-IV

PER

CEN

TAG

E OF C

ALLS W

ITH G

OO

D V

OIC

E QU

ALITY

- METR

OS

Oct 03-D

ec 03 Standard: > 95%

of calls with good voice quality

%age connections w

ith good voice quality - Metros

96.3%

91.8%

96.7%

95.3%

95.9%

94.8%

97.0%

91.3%

95.0%

95.4%

94.3%

95.0%

97.2%

95.0%

100.0%

95.4%

94.2%

92.3%

95.8%

91.7%

94.8%

91.2%

91.3%

98.5%

96.3%

92.9%

95.0%

89.7%

91.7%

93.1%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

Delhi - Bharti

Delhi - Hutch

Delhi - MTNL

Delhi - Idea

Mumbai -BPL

Mumbai -Hutch

Mumbai -MTNL

Mumbai -Bharti

Chennai -RPG

Chennai -Bharti

Chennai -Hutch

Chennai -BSNL

Kolkata -Bharti

Kolkata -Hutch

Kolkata -BSNL

October A

udit Data

Live Drive tests (drive test w

as conducted on a selected route only)

Page 32: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

41

PER

CEN

TAG

E OF C

ALLS W

ITH G

OO

D V

OIC

E QU

ALITY

– A C

IRC

LES

Standard: > 95% of calls w

ith good voice quality

%age connections w

ith good voice quality - A Circles

98.4%

100.0%

85.3%

99.7%

98.0%

89.3%

97.0%

99.2%

90.7%

99.5%

97.8%

92.5%

86.1%

97.8%

99.2%

99.3%

10.0%

100.3%

85.3%

88.3%

99.7%

89.3%

94.1%

95.9%

94.5%

80.2%

96.2%

97.5%

91.7%

86.1%

97.8%

95.5%

98.7%

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

Maharashtra -BPL

Maharashtra -Idea

Maharashtra -Bhart

Maharashtra -BSNL

Gujarat -Fascel

Gujarat - Idea

Gujarat -Bharti

Gujarat -BSNL

A.P. - Idea

A.P. - Bharti

A.P. - Hutch

A.P. - BSNL

Karnataka -Bharti

Karnataka -Spice

Karnataka -Hutch

Karnataka -BSNL

T.N. - BPL

T.N. - Aircel

T.N. - BSNL

T.N. - Bharti

October A

udit Data

Live Drive tests (drive test w

as conducted on a selected route only)

Page 33: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

42

A

nnex-V-a

PERC

ENTA

GE O

F CA

LLS WITH

GO

OD

VO

ICE Q

UA

LITY – B

CIR

CLES

Standard: > 95% of calls w

ith good voice quality

%age connections w

ith good voice quality - B C

ircles96.0%

100.0%

99.4%

97.0%

99.6%

99.9%

97.8%

99.3%

98.5%

100.0%

97.5%

84.1%

99.2%

98.5%

97.6%

99.0%

100.0%

96.3%

98.9%

96.0%

94.8%

95.6%

99.0%

99.9%

99.6%

100.0%

99.9%

100.0%

96.2%

97.3%

99.7%

91.3%

99.8%

99.2%

91.7%

99.2%

98.1%

91.5%

95.7%

99.4%

99.4%

97.6%

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

Kerala - Escotel

Kerala - BPL

Kerala - Bharti

Kerala - BSNL

Punjab - Spice

Punjab - Bharti

Punjab - BSNL

Haryana - Escotel

Haryana - Aircel

Haryana - Bharti

Haryana - BSNL

U.P.(W) - Escotel

U.P.(W) - Bharti

U.P.(W) - BSNL

U.P.(E) - Aircel

U.P.(E) - BSNL

Rajasthan - Aircel

Rajasthan - Hexacom

Rajasthan - BSNL

M.P. - Bharti

M.P. - Reliance

M.P. - Idea

M.P. - BSNL

W.B. & A&N - Reliance

W.B. & A&N - BSNL

October A

udit Data

Live Drive tests (drive test w

as conducted on a selected route only)

Page 34: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

43

PERCENTAGE OF CALLS WITH GOOD VOICE QUALITY – C CIRCLES

Standard: > 95% of calls with good voice quality

%age connections with good voice quality - C Circles

99.8

%

99.3

%

97.0

%

97.4

%

97.6

%

98.3

%

99.8

%

99.6

%

98.7

%

99.7

%

96.0

%

99.0

%

97.6

%

95.1

%

98.6

%

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%H

.P. -

Bha

rti

H.P

. -R

elia

nce

H.P

. - B

SN

L

Bih

ar -

Rel

ianc

e

Bih

ar -

BS

NL

Oris

sa -

Rel

ianc

e

Oris

sa -

BS

NL

Ass

am -

Rel

ianc

e

N.E

. -R

elia

nce

J&K

- B

SN

L

October Audit Data Live Drive tests (drive test was conducted on a selected route only)

Page 35: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

44

SUMMARY OF CELLULAR SERVICE OPERATAORS QoS AUDIT (METRO CIRCLE) Oct- Dec 2003

A.1.1

METROS S.no

Objective parameters Long term benchmark Delhi Delhi Delhi Delhi Mumbai Mumbai Mumbai Mumbai

Bharti Hutch MTNL Idea BPL Hutch MTNL Bharti Fault Incidence & repair

A (I) Fault incidences (per100 subscribers/ month) <1 0.14 0.39 1.03 0.45 0.05 0.25 0.48 0.03

A (ii) Fault cleared in 24 hours 100% 100.00% 99.06% NR 98.05% 99.22% 95.11% 49.62% 100.00%

A (iii) Accumulated down time of community isolation <24Hrs. 0.00 hrs. 73.68 hrs. 0.00 hrs. 0.00 hrs. 9.17 hrs. 0.00 hrs. 0.00 hrs. 0.00 hrs.

Network performance B (I) Call success rate >99% 99.07% 99.98% NR 99.98% 95.48% 87.53% NR 94.83%

B (ii) Service Access Delay 9 to 20 Sec. 9.3 to 15.27 sec.

9.07 to 15.16 sec. NR 6.89 to

11.01 sec.10.15 to

20.72 sec.7.58 to

10.13 sec.9.33 to

26.33 sec. 9.16 to 16.11

sec. B (iii) Call Drop rate <3% 2.1% 1.4% 1.6% 0.3% 1.9% 1.9% 1.4% 1.2%

B(iv) % connections with good voice quality >95% 96.29% 91.77% 96.74% 95.25% 95.94% 94.80% 97.04% 91.29%

Billing complaints

C(I) Billing complaints per 100 bills issued <0.1% 0.10% 0.07% 0.08% 0.20% 0.10% 1.85% 0.17% 0.09%

C (ii) %age of billing complaints resolved within 4 weeks 100% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.1% 100.0% 100.0%

C (iii) Period of all refunds/ from the date of resolution <4 weeks 100.0% NR NR 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% 100.0% 100.0%

Network and POI Congestion related parameters

D(I) SDCCH Establishment success rate Not applicable 99.7% 98.0% 97.6% 99.7% 99.5% 97.8% 73.6% 99.4%

D(ii) TCH Establishment success rate Not applicable 98.6% 98.3% 98.9% 94.0% 94.0% 97.8% 82.8% 92.2%

D (iii) Served Traffic for all POIs Not applicable 99.9% 67.3% 92.3% 61.0% 55.2% 38.1% 98.8% 76.5%

Page 36: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

45

METROS (CONTD.)

S.no Objective parameters Long term benchmark Chennai Chennai Chennai Chennai Kolkata Kolkata Kolkata

RPG Bharti Hutch BSNL Bharti Hutch BSNL Fault Incidence & repair

A (I) Fault incidences (per100 subscribers/ month) <1 0.46 0.02 0.36 0.00 0.63 0.04 1.73 A (ii) Fault cleared in 24 hours 100% 100.00% 100.00% 85.67% 100.00% 100.00% 76.05% 64.62%

A (iii) Accumulated down time of community isolation <24Hrs. 0.00 hrs. 0.00 hrs. 0.00 hrs. 16.17 hrs. 0.00 hrs. 15.33 hrs. 20.55 hrs.

Network performance B (I) Call success rate >99% 100.00% 99.44% 100.00% 97.97% 99.73% 98.87% 85.66%

B (ii) Service Access Delay 9 to 20 Sec.

7.54 to 14.03 sec.

11.68 to 19.48 sec.

5.69 to 13.22 sec.

15.32 to 20.52 sec.

14.33 to 19.6 sec.

14.78 to 17.33 sec. NR

B (iii) Call Drop rate <3% 1.3% 0.9% 0.9% 0.6% 1.4% 1.2% 1.2% B(iv) % connections with good voice quality >95% 95.03% 95.42% 94.32% 95.02% 97.18% 95.00% 100.00%

Billing complaints C(I) Billing complaints per 100 bills issued <0.1% 0.93% 0.13% 3.31% 1.03% 0.16% 0.10% 0.62%

C (ii) %age of billing complaints resolved within 4 weeks 100% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 93.1%

C (iii) Period of all refunds/ from the date of resolution <4 weeks NR 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 96.5%

Network and POI Congestion related parameters

D(I) SDCCH Establishment success rate Not applicable 96.2% 96.3% 95.0% 98.8% 99.0% 99.5% NR

D(ii) TCH Establishment success rate Not applicable 86.0% 99.5% 97.0% 97.1% 98.0% 98.7% 99.2%

D (iii) Served Traffic for all POIs Not applicable 63.5% 63.7% 67.5% 1.3% 49.8% 50.5% NR

Page 37: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

46

SUMMARY OF CELLULAR SERVICE OPERATAORS QoS AUDIT (A CIRCLE) Annex-V-b Oct- Dec 2003

S.no Objective parameters Long term benchmark MaharashtraMaharashtr

a Maharashtra Maharashtra Gujarat Gujarat Gujarat Gujarat

BPL Idea Bharti BSNL Fascel / Hutch Idea Bharti BSNL

Fault Incidence & repair

A (I) Fault incidences (per100 subscribers/ month) <1 0.70 0.01 0.18 0.09 0.02 0.02 0.19 0.00

A (ii) Fault cleared in 24 hours 100% 85.94% 100.00% 85.39% 25.19% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

A (iii) Accumulated down time of community isolation <24Hrs. 9.25 hrs. 50.47 hrs. 25.70 hrs. 109.83 hrs. 22.65 hrs. 59.57 hrs. 18.25 hrs. 73.00 hrs.

Network performance B (I) Call success rate >99% 99.88% 95.00% 86.83% 96.47% 99.00% 99.03% 99.23% 99.60%

B (ii) Service Access Delay 9 to 20 Sec. NR 7.33 to 19.45 sec.

9.5 to 15.3 sec. NR 7.58 to

17.9 sec.

6.07 to 18.87 sec.

9.9 to 16.93 sec.

6.14 to 8.37 sec.

B (iii) Call Drop rate <3% 1.5% 1.2% 1.4% 1.5% 0.9% 1.1% 1.1% 1.0% B(iv) % connections with good voice quality >95% 98.36% NR 100.00% 85.30% NR 99.69% 98.00% 89.29%

Billing complaints C(I) Billing complaints per 100 bills issued <0.1% 0.10% 0.10% 0.90% 1.27% 0.06% 0.15% 0.09% 1.16%

C (ii) %age of billing complaints resolved within 4 weeks 100% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 69.0% 100.0%

C (iii) Period of all refunds/ from the date of resolution <4 weeks 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% NR NR 63.5% NR NR

Network and POI Congestion related parameters D(I) SDCCH Establishment success rate Not applicable 99.4% 92.6% 99.9% 88.0% 99.6% 92.7% NR 98.0% D(ii) TCH Establishment success rate Not applicable 98.0% 81.0% 99.5% 93.9% 98.4% 94.3% NR 99.7% D (iii) Served Traffic for all POIs Not applicable 82.5% 87.6% 68.9% NR 89.0% NR NR 64.2%

Page 38: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

47

S.no Objective parameters Long term benchmark A.P. A.P. A.P. A.P. Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka Karnataka

Idea Bharti Hutch BSNL Bharti Spice Hutch BSNL Fault Incidence & repair

A (I) Fault incidences (per100 subscribers/ month) <1 0.00 0.03 0.73 0.12 0.13 0.31 0.13 0.03

A (ii) Fault cleared in 24 hours 100% 100.00% 100.00% 93.97% 56.15% 100.00% 100.00% 85.33% 48.68%

A (iii) Accumulated down time of community isolation <24Hrs. 21.70 hrs. 71.37 hrs. 111.85 hrs. 519.98

hrs. 60.00 hrs. 1.20 hrs. 37.65 hrs. 475.57 hrs.

Network performance B (I) Call success rate >99% 99.97% 99.04% 95.98% 97.85% 99.06% 99.64% NR NR

B (ii) Service Access Delay 9 to 20 Sec. 6.46 to 12.46 sec.

7.6 to 15.6 sec.

8 to 16.12 sec.

8.32 to 11.42 sec.

6.12 to 16.72 sec.

8.81 to 18.81 sec. NR NR

B (iii) Call Drop rate <3% 1.8% 1.5% 1.2% 2.0% 1.5% 1.4% 0.9% 1.4%

B(iv) % connections with good voice quality >95% 96.96% 99.19% 90.73% NR 99.46% 97.76% 92.48% 86.11%

Billing complaints

C(I) Billing complaints per 100 bills issued <0.1% 0.11% 0.24% 15.43% 2.36% 0.02% 0.10% 4.45% 1.63%

C (ii) %age of billing complaints resolved within 4 weeks 100% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 97.2% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 93.5%

C (iii) Period of all refunds/ from the date of resolution <4 weeks 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% NR 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 7.4%

Network and POI Congestion related parameters

D(I) SDCCH Establishment success rate Not applicable 99.8% 93.9% 96.2% 99.2% 96.8% 99.8% 97.1% 97.7%

D(ii) TCH Establishment success rate Not applicable 96.6% 97.5% 96.0% 96.6% 94.0% 97.6% 99.1% 94.0%

D (iii) Served Traffic for all POIs Not applicable 71.2% 77.2% 31.7% 38.5% 70.3% 58.9% 76.4% 81.5%

Page 39: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

48

S.no Objective parameters Long term benchmark T.N. T.N. T.N. T.N.

BPL Aircel BSNL Bharti Fault Incidence & repair

A (I) Fault incidences (per100 subscribers/ month) <1 0.43 0.17 0.10 0.05

A (ii) Fault cleared in 24 hours 100% 100.00% 1.74% 89.43% 100.00%

A (iii) Accumulated down time of community isolation <24Hrs. 3.68 hrs. 91.60 hrs. 75.83 hrs. 15.98 hrs.

Network performance B (I) Call success rate >99% 99.17% 34.92% 30.33% 99.47% B (ii) Service Access Delay 9 to 20 Sec. 6.24 to 11.9 sec. 14.16 to 31.14 sec. NR 14.07 to 20.07 sec.B (iii) Call Drop rate <3% 1.2% 1.6% 1.6% 1.4% B(iv) % connections with good voice quality >95% 97.78% NR NR 99.21%

Billing complaints C(I) Billing complaints per 100 bills issued <0.1% 0.06% 0.37% 0.53% 0.12%

C (ii) %age of billing complaints resolved within 4 weeks 100% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

C (iii) Period of all refunds/ from the date of resolution <4 weeks 100.0% 100.0% 37.1% 100.0%

Network and POI Congestion related parameters

D(I) SDCCH Establishment success rate Not applicable 98.1% 99.1% 98.4% 94.5%

D(ii) TCH Establishment success rate Not applicable 98.7% 97.7% 92.7% 99.5%

D (iii) Served Traffic for all POIs Not applicable 73.8% 99.9% NR 59.9%

Page 40: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

49

Annex- VI

SUMMARY OF CELLULAR SERVICE OPERATAORS QoS AUDIT (B CIRCLE) Oct- Dec 2003

S.no Objective parameters Long term benchmark Kerala Kerala Kerala Kerala Punjab Punjab Punjab

Escotel BPL Bharti BSNL Spice Bharti BSNL Fault Incidence & repair

A (I) Fault incidences (per100 subscribers/ month) <1 0.34 0.04 0.05 2.35 0.23 0.04 0.23

A (ii) Fault cleared in 24 hours 100% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% NR 99.05% 100.00% NR

A (iii) Accumulated down time of community isolation <24Hrs. 10.21 hrs. 3.07 hrs. 11.30 hrs. 63.53 hrs. 23.47 hrs. 10.75 hrs. 31.58 hrs.

Network performance B (I) Call success rate >99% 99.95% 99.22% 99.23% 89.50% 98.07% 99.01% 78.00%

B (ii) Service Access Delay 9 to 20 Sec. 9.3 to 18.6 sec.

6.02 to 12.37 sec.

14.05 to 19.05 sec.

16.8 to 20.8 sec.

12.29 to 21.52 sec.

7.37 to 15.24 sec. NR

B (iii) Call Drop rate <3% 1.0% 1.1% 1.3% 1.6% 1.3% 1.6% 2.1% B(iv) % connections with good voice quality >95% 95.98% 100.00% 99.35% NR 96.97% 99.62% NR

Billing complaints C(I) Billing complaints per 100 bills issued <0.1% 0.05% 0.03% 0.22% 3.00% 0.02% 0.09% 2.47%

C (ii) %age of billing complaints resolved within 4 weeks 100% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 90.0% 100.0% 100.0% 95.0%

C (iii) Period of all refunds/ from the date of resolution <4 weeks 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% NR 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Network and POI Congestion related parameters D(I) SDCCH Establishment success rate Not applicable 99.0% 99.7% 95.3% 99.7% 98.9% 95.1% 89.7% D(ii) TCH Establishment success rate Not applicable 98.7% 97.5% 99.3% 98.0% 96.3% 99.0% 41.8% D (iii) Served Traffic for all POIs Not applicable 55.6% 88.1% 50.4% 71.4% 93.4% 83.6% 97.7%

Page 41: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

50

B CIRCLES (CONTD.)

S.no Objective parameters Long term benchmark Haryana Haryana Haryana Haryana U.P.(W) U.P.(W) U.P.(W) U.P.(E) U.P.(E)

Escotel Aircel Bharti BSNL Escotel Bharti BSNL Aircel BSNL Fault Incidence & repair

A (I) Fault incidences (per100 subscribers/ month) <1 0.06 1.00 0.08 0.04 0.16 0.06 0.21 0.05 0.09

A (ii) Fault cleared in 24 hours 100% 100.00% 97.75% 100.00% 100.00% 93.86% 100.00% 84.14% 79.61% NR

A (iii) Accumulated down time of community isolation <24Hrs. 11.07 hrs. 1.12 hrs. 6.17 hrs. 8.00 hrs. 0.00 hrs. 8.00 hrs. 0.00 hrs. 0.00 hrs. 6.00 hrs.

Network performance B (I) Call success rate >99% 99.76% 99.92% 99.02% 97.50% 99.12% 99.01% NR 98.59% 72.35%

B (ii) Service Access Delay 9 to 20 Sec. 11.06 to 19.48 sec.

14.74 to 19.48 sec.

6.31 to 14.31 sec. NR

11.43 to 16.83 sec.

9.06 to 14.1 sec. NR

7.07 to 14.82 sec.

NR

B (iii) Call Drop rate <3% 0.9% 1.1% 1.8% 3.2% 1.3% 2.3% NR NR 2.6%

B(iv) % connections with good voice quality >95% 99.86% 97.81% NR NR 99.31% 98.54% 100.00% NR NR

Billing complaints

C(I) Billing complaints per 100 bills issued <0.1% 0.21% 0.03% 0.09% 0.54% 0.42% 0.09% 1.24% 0.88% 0.21%

C (ii) %age of billing complaints resolved within 4 weeks 100% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 92.2%

C (iii) Period of all refunds/ from the date of resolution <4 weeks 100.0% NR NR 100.0% NR 100.0% NR 100.0% 83.2%

Network and POI Congestion related parameters

D(I) SDCCH Establishment success rate Not applicable 99.5% 93.8% 95.8% 89.4% 99.2% 99.6% 94.3% NR 92.0%

D(ii) TCH Establishment success rate Not applicable 96.3% 92.9% 99.0% 84.9% 97.1% 98.3% 88.7% NR 82.0%

D (iii) Served Traffic for all POIs Not applicable 98.9% 100.0% 73.2% 99.7% 97.5% 99.6% 99.3% NR 0.8%

Page 42: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

51

B CIRCLES (CONTD.)

S.no Objective parameters Long term benchmark Rajasthan Rajasthan Rajasthan M.P. M.P. M.P. M.P. W.B. & A&N W.B. &

A&N Aircel Hexacom BSNL Bharti Reliance Idea BSNL Reliance BSNL Fault Incidence & repair

A (I) Fault incidences (per100 subscribers/ month) <1 0.15 0.35 0.16 0.15 0.05 0.19 NR 0.16 0.21

A (ii) Fault cleared in 24 hours 100% 32.81% 65.22% 100.00% 100.00% 51.11% 87.89% NR 100.00% 100.00%

A (iii) Accumulated down time of community isolation <24Hrs. 42.22 hrs. 36.37 hrs. 38.30 hrs. 7.50 hrs. 12.35 hrs. 50.47 hrs. 294.25 hrs. 19.60 hrs. 0.00 hrs.

Network performance B (I) Call success rate >99% 100.05%* 84.42% 99.50% 99.93% 124.80%* 99.11% 82.61% 102.52%* 99.04%

B (ii) Service Access Delay 9 to 20 Sec. 9 to 17 sec. NR NR 8.39 to 13.24 sec. 10 to 16 sec. 8.09 to

16.11 sec.12.72 to

14.44 sec.10.52 to

15.52 sec. NR

B (iii) Call Drop rate <3% 17.9% 1.2% 2.0% 0.9% 2.9% 1.2% 1.5% 2.8% 3.0%

B(iv) % connections with good voice quality >95% 97.46% 84.14% NR 99.18% 98.52% 97.64% 98.97% 100.00% NR

Billing complaints

C(I) Billing complaints per 100 bills issued <0.1% 0.03% 0.05% 0.51% 0.09% 0.08% 0.91% 0.03% NR 0.05%

C (ii) %age of billing complaints resolved within 4 weeks

100% 100.0% 100.0% 99.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% NR 100.0%

C (iii) Period of all refunds/ from the date of resolution

<4 weeks 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% NR 100.0% NR

Network and POI Congestion related parameters

D(I) SDCCH Establishment success rate

Not applicable 99.8% 85.0% 93.7% 99.7% 99.9% 98.6% 90.6% 98.2% 98.2%

D(ii) TCH Establishment success rate

Not applicable 94.9% 69.2% 87.6% 98.8% 98.2% 93.6% 94.7% 97.0% 83.8%

D (iii) Served Traffic for all POIs

Not applicable 57.6% 49.3% 1.2% 49.5% 98.6% 39.6% 76.8% 99.3% NR

* The CSR figure for these operators exceeds 100% due to the inability of the service providers MSC to capture the results as per the prescribed methodology.

Page 43: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

52

SUMMARY OF CELLULAR SERVICE OPERATAORS QoS AUDIT (C CIRCLE) Annex-VII S.no Objective parameters Long term

benchmark H.P. H.P. H.P. Bihar Bihar Orissa Orissa Assam N.E. J&K

Bharti Reliance BSNL Reliance BSNL Reliance BSNL Reliance Reliance BSNL Fault Incidence & repair

A (I) Fault incidences (per100 subscribers/ month) <1 0.13 0.12 0.07 0.02 0.89 0.13 0.35 NR 0.00 NR

A (ii) Fault cleared in 24 hours 100% 100.00% 100.00% NR 100.00% NR 100.00% 73.50% NR 100.00% NR

A (iii) Accumulated down time of community isolation <24Hrs. 19.75 hrs. 9.15 hrs. 885.80 hrs. 61.55 hrs. 0.00 hrs. 14.85 hrs. 86.68 hrs. 0.00 hrs. 0.00 hrs. 0.00 hrs.

Network performance B (I) Call success rate >99% 99.01% 37.89% 90.63% 95.56% 86.51% 99.17% 220.06%* 127.84%* 107.27%* NR

B (ii) Service Access Delay 9 to 20 Sec. 8.02 to 15.94 sec. NR NR NR NR 9.86 to 14.9

sec. 13 to 26

sec. 9.37 to 15.7

sec. 9.32 to

15.65 sec. NR

B (iii) Call Drop rate <3% 2.0% 2.2% 3.7% 2.4% 3.2% 2.5% 5.8% 3.0% 1.2% NR

B(iv) % connections with good voice quality >95% 99.79% 99.34% NR 96.96% NR 97.41% 97.65% 98.32% 99.77% NR

Billing complaints

C(I) Billing complaints per 100 bills issued <0.1% 0.10% NR NR NR NR NR 0.66% NR NR NR

C (ii) %age of billing complaints resolved within 4 weeks 100% 100.0% NR NR NR NR NR 100.0% NR NR NR

C (iii) Period of all refunds/ from the date of resolution <4 weeks 100.0% NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR

Network and POI Congestion related parameters

D(I) SDCCH Establishment success rate Not applicable 95.9% 99.3% 92.0% 99.2% 92.2% 99.2% 94.4% 99.6% 99.6% NR

D(ii) TCH Establishment success rate Not applicable 99.0% 96.8% 90.4% 96.4% 69.7% 97.0% 73.6% 95.5% 99.6% NR

D (iii) Served Traffic for all POIs Not applicable 78.8% 96.2% 97.3% 95.4% 83.8% 95.7% NR 100.0% 99.9% NR * The CSR figure for these operators exceeds 100% due to the inability of the service providers MSC to capture the results as per the prescribed

methodology.

Page 44: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

53

Annex-VIII CUSTOMER SURVEY SCORES ON SATISFACTION WITH SERVICE PROVISION – GSM SERVICES (METROS)

Oct.’03-Dec.’03

Standard: > 95%

90%96%

92%95%

72%

94% 93%96% 94% 94%

87%90% 91% 89%

93%95%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Che

nnai

-B

SN

L

Che

nnai

- A

irtel

Che

nnai

-H

utch

Che

nnai

- R

PG

Kol

kata

- B

SN

L

Kol

kata

- A

irtel

Kol

kata

- H

utch

Del

hi -

Airt

el

Del

hi -

Hut

ch

Del

hi -

Idea

Del

hi -

MTN

L

Mum

bai -

Airt

el

Mum

bai -

BP

L

Mum

bai -

MTN

L

Mum

bai -

Ora

nge

Page 45: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

54

Annex-IX

CU

STOM

ER SU

RV

EY SC

OR

ES ON

SATISFA

CTIO

N W

ITH SER

VIC

E PRO

VISIO

N – G

SM SER

VIC

ES (A C

IRC

LES)

Oct.’03-D

ec.’03 Standard: > 95%

93%96%

95%94%

90%93%

92%94%

79%88%

90%

79%87%

90%83%

93%96%

96%96%

96%95%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

AP - BSNL

AP - Airtel

AP - Hutch

AP - Idea

Gujarat -BSNL

Gujarat - Airtel

Gujarat -Hutch

Gujarat - Idea

K’taka - BSNL

K’taka - Airtel

K’taka - Hutch

K’taka - Spice

M’rastra -BSNL

M’rastra -Airtel

M’rastra - BPL

M’rastra - Idea

TN - BSNL

TN - Airtel

TN - Aircell

TN - BPL

Page 46: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

55

Annex-X

CU

STOM

ER SU

RV

EY SC

OR

ES ON

SATISFA

CTIO

N W

ITH SER

VIC

E PRO

VISIO

N – G

SM SER

VIC

ES (B C

IRC

LES)

O

ct.’03-Dec.’03

Standard: > 95%

95%98%

97%95%

90%89%

86%90%

85%82%

81%87%

93%94%

95%

80%

92%94%

90%99%

90%98%

97%

77%

88%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%Haryana - BSNL

Haryana - Airtel

Haryana - Escotel

Haryana - Essar

Kerala - BSNL

Kerala - Airtel

Kerala - BPL

Kerala - Escotel

MP - BSNL

MP - Airtel

MP - Reliance

MP - Idea

Punjab - BSNL

Punjab - Airtel

Punjab - Spice

R’than - BSNL

R’than - Essar

R’than - Oasis

U P (E) - BSNL

U P (E) - Essar

U P (W) - BSNL

U P (W) - Airtel

U P (W) - Escotel

WB - BSNL

WB - Reliance

Page 47: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

56

Annex-XI

CUSTOMER SURVEY SCORES ON SATISFACTION WITH SERVICE PROVISION – GSM SERVICES (C CIRCLES)

Oct.’03-Dec.’03

Standard: > 95%

Annex-XII

85% 85%

95%

77%

89% 88%

52%

95%

85%

94%95%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Ass

am -

Rel

ianc

e

Bih

ar -

BS

NL

Bih

ar -

Rel

ianc

e

HP

- B

SN

L

HP

- A

irtel

HP

- R

elia

nce

J&K

- B

SN

L

N. E

. -R

elia

nce

Oris

sa -

BS

NL

Oris

sa -

Rel

ianc

e

Page 48: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

57

CUSTOMER SURVEY SCORES ON SATISFACTION WITH NETWORK PERFORMANCE, RELIABILITY & AVAILABILITY – GSM SERVICES (METROS)

Oct.’03-Dec.’03

Standard: > 95%

89%93% 90%

94%

62%

78%82%

93% 90% 88%

76% 79% 79% 79%83%

95%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%C

henn

ai -

BS

NL

Che

nnai

-A

irtel

Che

nnai

-H

utch

Che

nnai

-R

PG

Kol

kata

-B

SN

L

Kol

kata

- A

irtel

Kol

kata

-H

utch

Del

hi -

Airt

el

Del

hi -

Hut

ch

Del

hi -

Idea

Del

hi -

MTN

L

Mum

bai -

Airt

el

Mum

bai -

BP

L

Mum

bai -

MTN

L

Mum

bai -

Ora

nge

Page 49: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

58

Annex-XIII

CUSTOMER SURVEY SCORES ON SATISFACTION WITH NETWORK PERFORMANCE, RELIABILITY & AVAILABILITY – GSM SERVICES (A CIRCLES)

Oct.’03-Dec.’03

Standard: > 95%

86%93% 92% 91%

85%89% 91% 92%

74%

84%78%

71% 70%

82%

67%

86% 87% 90%86% 86%95%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%A

P -

BS

NL

AP

- A

irtel

AP

- H

utch

AP

- Id

ea

Guj

arat

-B

SN

L

Guj

arat

- A

irtel

Guj

arat

-H

utch

Guj

arat

- Id

ea

K’ta

ka -

BS

NL

K’ta

ka -

Airt

el

K’ta

ka -

Hut

ch

K’ta

ka -

Spi

ce

M’ra

stra

-B

SN

L

M’ra

stra

-A

irtel

M’ra

stra

- B

PL

M’ra

stra

- Id

ea

TN -

BS

NL

TN -

Airt

el

TN -

Airc

ell

TN -

BP

L

Page 50: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

59

Annex-X

IV

C

USTO

MER

SUR

VEY

SCO

RES O

N SA

TISFAC

TION

WITH

NETW

OR

K PER

FOR

MA

NC

E, RELIA

BILITY

& A

VA

ILAB

ILITY – G

SM

SERV

ICES (B

CIR

CLES)

Oct.’03-D

ec.’03 Standard: > 95%

87%91%

85%83%

82%76%

77%77%

84%81%

84%84%

78%

88%85%

72%

85%81%

88%85%

82%

91%84%

69%

46%

95%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%Haryana - BSNL

Haryana - Airtel

Haryana - Escotel

Haryana - Essar

Kerala - BSNL

Kerala - Airtel

Kerala - BPL

Kerala - Escotel

MP - BSNL

MP - Airtel

MP - Reliance

MP - Idea

Punjab - BSNL

Punjab - Airtel

Punjab - Spice

R’than - BSNL

R’than - Essar

R’than - Oasis

U P (E) - BSNL

U P (E) - Essar

U P (W) - BSNL

U P (W) - Airtel

U P (W) - Escotel

WB - BSNL

WB - Reliance

Page 51: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

60

Annex-XV

CUSTOMER SURVEY SCORES ON SATISFACTION WITH NETWORK PERFORMANCE, RELIABILITY & AVAILABILITY – GSM SERVICES (C CIRCLES)

Oct.’03-Dec.’03

Standard: > 95%

51%

65%

74% 73%

83%

71% 69% 71% 69%

77%

95%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Ass

am -

Rel

ianc

e

Bih

ar -

BS

NL

Bih

ar -

Rel

ianc

e

HP

- B

SN

L

HP

- A

irtel

HP

- R

elia

nce

J&K

- B

SN

L

N. E

. -R

elia

nce

Oris

sa -

BS

NL

Oris

sa -

Rel

ianc

e

Page 52: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

61

Annex-XVI

CUSTOMER SURVEY SCORES ON SATISFACTION WITH MAINTAINABILITY – GSM SERVICES (METROS)

Oct.’03-Dec.’03

Standard: > 95%

85%91% 91% 92%

65%71%

77%

89% 87% 86%

72% 75% 76% 74%

84%95%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Che

nnai

-B

SN

L

Che

nnai

-A

irtel

Che

nnai

-H

utch

Che

nnai

-R

PG

Kol

kata

-B

SN

L

Kol

kata

- A

irtel

Kol

kata

-H

utch

Del

hi -

Airt

el

Del

hi -

Hut

ch

Del

hi -

Idea

Del

hi -

MTN

L

Mum

bai -

Airt

el

Mum

bai -

BP

L

Mum

bai -

MTN

L

Mum

bai -

Ora

nge

Page 53: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

62

Annex-X

VII

C

USTO

MER

SUR

VEY

SCO

RES O

N SA

TISFAC

TION

WITH

MA

INTA

INA

BILITY

– GSM

SERV

ICES (A

CIR

CLES)

O

ct.’03-Dec.’03

Standard: > 95%

88%91%

91%87%

84%85%

86%86%

78%83%

77%75%

66%71%

54%

80%84%

86%87%

84%95%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

AP - BSNL

AP - Airtel

AP - Hutch

AP - Idea

Gujarat -BSNL

Gujarat - Airtel

Gujarat -Hutch

Gujarat - Idea

K’taka - BSNL

K’taka - Airtel

K’taka - Hutch

K’taka - Spice

M’rastra -BSNL

M’rastra -Airtel

M’rastra - BPL

M’rastra - Idea

TN - BSNL

TN - Airtel

TN - Aircell

TN - BPL

Page 54: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

63

Annex-X

VIII

C

USTO

MER

SUR

VEY

SCO

RES O

N SA

TISFAC

TION

WITH

MA

INTA

INA

BILITY

– GSM

SERV

ICES (B

CIR

CLES)

O

ct.’03-Dec.’03

Standard: > 95%

86%92%

83%81%

76%76%

72%74%

69%

59%

72%76%

77%

86%88%

71%77%

78%75%

83%

61%

79%74%

67%59%

95%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Haryana - BSNL

Haryana - Airtel

Haryana - Escotel

Haryana - Essar

Kerala - BSNL

Kerala - Airtel

Kerala - BPL

Kerala - Escotel

MP - BSNL

MP - Airtel

MP - Reliance

MP - Idea

Punjab - BSNL

Punjab - Airtel

Punjab - Spice

R’than - BSNL

R’than - Essar

R’than - Oasis

U P (E) - BSNL

U P (E) - Essar

U P (W) - BSNL

U P (W) - Airtel

U P (W) - Escotel

WB - BSNL

WB - Reliance

Page 55: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

64

Annex-XIX

CUSTOMER SURVEY SCORES ON SATISFACTION WITH MAINTAINABILITY – GSM SERVICES (C CIRCLES)

Oct.’03-Dec.’03

Standard: > 95%

70%65%

70%66%

77%

67%

87%

69%73%

77%

95%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Ass

am -

Rel

ianc

e

Bih

ar -

BS

NL

Bih

ar -

Rel

ianc

e

HP

- B

SN

L

HP

- A

irtel

HP

- R

elia

nce

J&K

- B

SN

L

N. E

. -R

elia

nce

Oris

sa -

BS

NL

Oris

sa -

Rel

ianc

e

Page 56: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

65

Annex-XX CUSTOMER SURVEY SCORES ON SATISFACTION WITH HELP SERVICES – GSM SERVICES (METROS)

Oct.’03-Dec.’03

Standard: > 90%

84%

92% 90% 92%

63%

80% 83%

91% 88% 89%

73%79% 81% 79%

89%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Che

nnai

-B

SN

L

Che

nnai

-A

irtel

Che

nnai

-H

utch

Che

nnai

-R

PG

Kol

kata

-B

SN

L

Kol

kata

- A

irtel

Kol

kata

-H

utch

Del

hi -

Airt

el

Del

hi -

Hut

ch

Del

hi -

Idea

Del

hi -

MTN

L

Mum

bai -

Airt

el

Mum

bai -

BP

L

Mum

bai -

MTN

L

Mum

bai -

Ora

nge

Page 57: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

66

Annex-X

XI

CU

STOM

ER SU

RV

EY SC

OR

ES ON

SATISFA

CTIO

N W

ITH H

ELP SERV

ICES – G

SM SER

VIC

ES (A C

IRC

LES)

Oct.’03-D

ec.’03 Standard: > 90%

91%92%

93%91%

82%89%

91%89%

79%86%

83%79%

73%

81%

71%

84%78%

89%88%

89%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

AP - BSNL

AP - Airtel

AP - Hutch

AP - Idea

Gujarat -BSNL

Gujarat - Airtel

Gujarat -Hutch

Gujarat - Idea

K’taka - BSNL

K’taka - Airtel

K’taka - Hutch

K’taka - Spice

M’rastra -BSNL

M’rastra -Airtel

M’rastra - BPL

M’rastra - Idea

TN - BSNL

TN - Airtel

TN - Aircell

TN - BPL

Page 58: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

67

Annex-X

XII

CU

STOM

ER SU

RV

EY SC

OR

ES ON

SATISFA

CTIO

N W

ITH H

ELP SERV

ICES – G

SM SER

VIC

ES (B C

IRC

LES)

Oct.’03-D

ec.’03 Standard: > 90%

92%93%

84%85%

79%82%

83%82%

83%85%

87%88%

76%

86%88%

77%82%

85%82%

90%

73%

91%87%

79%

67%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Haryana - BSNL

Haryana - Airtel

Haryana - Escotel

Haryana - Essar

Kerala - BSNL

Kerala - Airtel

Kerala - BPL

Kerala - Escotel

MP - BSNL

MP - Airtel

MP - Reliance

MP - Idea

Punjab - BSNL

Punjab - Airtel

Punjab - Spice

R’than - BSNL

R’than - Essar

R’than - Oasis

U P (E) - BSNL

U P (E) - Essar

U P (W) - BSNL

U P (W) - Airtel

U P (W) - Escotel

WB - BSNL

WB - Reliance

Page 59: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

68

Annex-XXIII CUSTOMER SURVEY SCORES ON SATISFACTION WITH HELP SERVICES – GSM SERVICES (C CIRCLES)

Oct.’03-Dec.’03

Standard: > 90%

78%72%

80%

68%

79%72%

65%

89%

78%85%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Ass

am -

Rel

ianc

e

Bih

ar -

BS

NL

Bih

ar -

Rel

ianc

e

HP

- B

SN

L

HP

- A

irtel

HP

- R

elia

nce

J&K

- B

SN

L

N. E

. -R

elia

nce

Oris

sa -

BS

NL

Oris

sa -

Rel

ianc

e

Page 60: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

69

Annex-XXIV CUSTOMER SURVEY SCORES ON SATISFACTION WITH BILLING – GSM SERVICES (METROS)

Oct.’03-Dec.’03

Standard: > 90%

88% 90% 88% 91%

67%

77%73%

91% 88% 90%

75%80% 83% 82%

89%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Che

nnai

-B

SN

L

Che

nnai

-A

irtel

Che

nnai

-H

utch

Che

nnai

-R

PG

Kol

kata

-B

SN

L

Kol

kata

- A

irtel

Kol

kata

-H

utch

Del

hi -

Airt

el

Del

hi -

Hut

ch

Del

hi -

Idea

Del

hi -

MTN

L

Mum

bai -

Airt

el

Mum

bai -

BP

L

Mum

bai -

MTN

L

Mum

bai -

Ora

nge

Page 61: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

70

Annex-X

XV

C

USTO

MER

SUR

VEY

SCO

RES O

N SA

TISFAC

TION

WITH

BILLIN

G – G

SM SER

VIC

ES (A C

IRC

LES)

Oct.’03-D

ec.’03 Standard: > 90%

90%90%

91%

87%85%

90%89%

90%

76%

84%82%

76%

82%83%

76%

87%85%

84%85%

87%

65%

70%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

AP - BSNL

AP - Airtel

AP - Hutch

AP - Idea

Gujarat -BSNL

Gujarat - Airtel

Gujarat -Hutch

Gujarat - Idea

K’taka - BSNL

K’taka - Airtel

K’taka - Hutch

K’taka - Spice

M’rastra -BSNL

M’rastra -Airtel

M’rastra - BPL

M’rastra - Idea

TN - BSNL

TN - Airtel

TN - Aircell

TN - BPL

Page 62: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

71

Annex-X

XV

I C

USTO

MER

SUR

VEY

SCO

RES O

N SA

TISFAC

TION

WITH

BILLIN

G – G

SM SER

VIC

ES (B C

IRC

LES)

Oct.’03-D

ec.’03 Standard: > 90%

91%89%

88%87%

77%76%

79%79%

82%80%

78%85%

88%90%

90%

73%

88%85%

85%89%

76%

87%83%

66%65%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Haryana - BSNL

Haryana - Airtel

Haryana - Escotel

Haryana - Essar

Kerala - BSNL

Kerala - Airtel

Kerala - BPL

Kerala - Escotel

MP - BSNL

MP - Airtel

MP - Reliance

MP - Idea

Punjab - BSNL

Punjab - Airtel

Punjab - Spice

R’than - BSNL

R’than - Essar

R’than - Oasis

U P (E) - BSNL

U P (E) - Essar

U P (W) - BSNL

U P (W) - Airtel

U P (W) - Escotel

WB - BSNL

WB - Reliance

Page 63: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

72

Annex-XXVII

CUSTOMER SURVEY SCORES ON SATISFACTION WITH BILLING – GSM SERVICES (C CIRCLES)

Oct.’03-Dec.’03 Standard: > 90%

76%80%

74% 71%

80%

65% 65%

86%

73% 70%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%A

ssam

-R

elia

nce

Bih

ar -

BS

NL

Bih

ar -

Rel

ianc

e

HP

- B

SN

L

HP

- A

irtel

HP

- R

elia

nce

J&K

- B

SN

L

N. E

. -R

elia

nce

Oris

sa -

BS

NL

Oris

sa -

Rel

ianc

e

Page 64: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

73

Annex-XXVIII CUSTOMER SURVEY SCORES ON SATISFACTION WITH SUPPLEMENTARY SERVICES – GSM SERVICES

(METROS)

Oct.’03-Dec.’03 Standard: > 95%

88% 87% 86% 88%

79%82% 84%

94% 93% 93%

80% 83% 85% 85%91%95%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%C

henn

ai -

BS

NL

Che

nnai

-A

irtel

Che

nnai

-H

utch

Che

nnai

-R

PG

Kol

kata

-B

SN

L

Kol

kata

- A

irtel

Kol

kata

-H

utch

Del

hi -

Airt

el

Del

hi -

Hut

ch

Del

hi -

Idea

Del

hi -

MTN

L

Mum

bai -

Airt

el

Mum

bai -

BP

L

Mum

bai -

MTN

L

Mum

bai -

Ora

nge

Page 65: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

74

Annex-X

XIX

C

USTO

MER

SUR

VEY

SCO

RES O

N SA

TISFAC

TION

WITH

SUPPLEM

ENTA

RY

SERV

ICES – G

SM SER

VIC

ES (A

CIR

CLES)

Oct.’03-D

ec.’03 Standard: > 95%

94%95%

97%94%

92%95%

94%95%

77%84%

84%79%

87%86%

77%

87%83%

89%84%

89%95%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%AP - BSNL

AP - Airtel

AP - Hutch

AP - Idea

Gujarat -BSNL

Gujarat - Airtel

Gujarat -Hutch

Gujarat - Idea

K’taka - BSNL

K’taka - Airtel

K’taka - Hutch

K’taka - Spice

M’rastra -BSNL

M’rastra -Airtel

M’rastra - BPL

M’rastra - Idea

TN - BSNL

TN - Airtel

TN - Aircell

TN - BPL

Page 66: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

75

Annex-X

XX

CU

STOM

ER SU

RV

EY SC

OR

ES ON

SATISFA

CTIO

N W

ITH SU

PPLEMEN

TAR

Y SER

VIC

ES – GSM

SERV

ICES

(B C

IRC

LES)

Oct.’03-D

ec.’03 Standard: > 95%

94%93%

92%89%

83%84%

78%78%

89%93%

93%91%

88%91%

92%

81%89%

85%92%

91%91%

88%88%

81%73%

95%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%Haryana - BSNL

Haryana - Airtel

Haryana - Escotel

Haryana - Essar

Kerala - BSNL

Kerala - Airtel

Kerala - BPL

Kerala - Escotel

MP - BSNL

MP - Airtel

MP - Reliance

MP - Idea

Punjab - BSNL

Punjab - Airtel

Punjab - Spice

R’than - BSNL

R’than - Essar

R’than - Oasis

U P (E) - BSNL

U P (E) - Essar

U P (W) - BSNL

U P (W) - Airtel

U P (W) - Escotel

WB - BSNL

WB - Reliance

Page 67: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

76

Annex-XXXI

CUSTOMER SURVEY SCORES ON SATISFACTION WITH SUPPLEMENTARY SERVICES – GSM SERVICES (C CIRCLES)

Oct.’03-Dec.’03 Standard: > 95%

75%82%

86%

78%

87%

76%

68%

84%90% 90%95%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Ass

am -

Rel

ianc

e

Bih

ar -

BS

NL

Bih

ar -

Rel

ianc

e

HP

- B

SN

L

HP

- A

irtel

HP

- R

elia

nce

J&K

- B

SN

L

N. E

. -R

elia

nce

Oris

sa -

BS

NL

Oris

sa -

Rel

ianc

e

Page 68: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

77

Annex-XXXII

CUSTOMER SURVEY SCORES ON SATISFACTION WITH OVERALL SERVICE – GSM SERVICES (METROS)

Oct.’03-Dec.’03 Standard: > 95%

90% 93% 91% 93%

61%

76%81%

91% 88% 87%

73%

83% 81% 84%89%95%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%C

henn

ai -

BS

NL

Che

nnai

-A

irtel

Che

nnai

-H

utch

Che

nnai

-R

PG

Kol

kata

-B

SN

L

Kol

kata

- A

irtel

Kol

kata

-H

utch

Del

hi -

Airt

el

Del

hi -

Hut

ch

Del

hi -

Idea

Del

hi -

MTN

L

Mum

bai -

Airt

el

Mum

bai -

BP

L

Mum

bai -

MTN

L

Mum

bai -

Ora

nge

Page 69: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

78

Annex-X

XX

III

CU

STOM

ER SU

RV

EY SC

OR

ES ON

SATISFA

CTIO

N W

ITH O

VER

ALL SER

VIC

E – GSM

SERV

ICES

(A C

IRC

LES) O

ct.’03-Dec.’03

Standard: > 95%

88%93%

91%91%

85%91%

93%91%

78%83%

82%75%

72%

80%

65%

82%85%

83%78%

81%

95%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%AP - BSNL

AP - Airtel

AP - Hutch

AP - Idea

Gujarat -BSNL

Gujarat - Airtel

Gujarat -Hutch

Gujarat - Idea

K’taka - BSNL

K’taka - Airtel

K’taka - Hutch

K’taka - Spice

M’rastra -BSNL

M’rastra -Airtel

M’rastra - BPL

M’rastra - Idea

TN - BSNL

TN - Airtel

TN - Aircell

TN - BPL

Page 70: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

79

Annex-X

XX

IV

CU

STOM

ER SU

RV

EY SC

OR

ES ON

SATISFA

CTIO

N W

ITH O

VER

ALL SER

VIC

E – GSM

SERV

ICES

(B C

IRC

LES)

Oct.’03-D

ec.’03 Standard: > 95%

91%88%

83%82%

81%73%

74%74%

89%86%

90%91%

76%84%

84%

71%

84%76%

79%72%

74%

89%

78%72%

44%

95%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%Haryana - BSNL

Haryana - Airtel

Haryana - Escotel

Haryana - Essar

Kerala - BSNL

Kerala - Airtel

Kerala - BPL

Kerala - Escotel

MP - BSNL

MP - Airtel

MP - Reliance

MP - Idea

Punjab - BSNL

Punjab - Airtel

Punjab - Spice

R’than - BSNL

R’than - Essar

R’than - Oasis

U P (E) - BSNL

U P (E) - Essar

U P (W) - BSNL

U P (W) - Airtel

U P (W) - Escotel

WB - BSNL

WB - Reliance

Page 71: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

80

Annex-XXXV

CUSTOMER SURVEY SCORES ON SATISFACTION WITH OVERALL SERVICE – GSM SERVICES (C CIRCLES)

Oct.’03-Dec.’03 Standard: > 95%

2.1 METROS

59%

67%73%

63%

75%

59%

70%77%

84%

76%

95%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%A

ssam

-R

elia

nce

Bih

ar -

BS

NL

Bih

ar -

Rel

ianc

e

HP

- B

SN

L

HP

- A

irtel

HP

- R

elia

nce

J&K

- B

SN

L

N. E

. -R

elia

nce

Oris

sa -

BS

NL

Oris

sa -

Rel

ianc

e

Page 72: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

81

Annex-I Overall performance of CDMA service operators on some selected service parameters

CDMA Operators in Metro Circle

Oct.03- Dec 03

A.2.1 METROS Chennai Chennai Delhi Delhi Kolkata Mumbai MumbaiS.no Objective parameters RIL TTL RIL TTL RIL RIL TTL Fault Incidence & repair A (I) Fault incidences (per100 subscribers/ month) 0.729 0.034 1.061 1.183 0.809 1.373 1.525 A (ii) Fault cleared in 24 hours 98.9% 100.0% 99.0% 99.3% 99.0% 99.0% 99.7%

A (iii) Accumulated down time of community isolation 0.00 hrs. 1.48 hrs.

0.00 hrs. 69.55 hrs. 0.00 hrs. 0.00 hrs. 2.52 hrs.

Network performance B (I) Call setup success rate Incoming 98.75% 98.61% 99.57% 94.99% 99.25% 99.09% 87.45% Outgoing 98.51% 98.24% 98.41% 95.48% 98.52% 98.52% 88.55% Total 98.58% 98.36% 98.79% 95.35% 98.77% 98.72% 88.26%

B (ii) Service Access Delay 7.52 to 11.44 sec. NR NR NR

7.38 to 11.1 sec.

7.07 to 10.99 sec. NR

B (iii) Call Drop rate 1.26% 0.72% 0.74% 0.75% 0.77% 1.02% 1.26%

B(iv) % connections with good voice quality (%ageconnections with FER)

0-2 97.32% 80.73% 97.88% NR 98.19% 99.36% NR 2-4 1.87% 14.17% 0.67% NR 1.61% 0.46% NR More than 4 0.80% 5.10% 1.45% NR 0.20% 0.18% NR

Page 73: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

82

METROS (CONTD.) Chennai Chennai Delhi Delhi Kolkata Mumbai MumbaiS.no Objective parameters RIL TTL RIL TTL RIL RIL TTL Billing complaints C(I) Billing complaints per 100 bills issued 0.11% 0.16% 0.15% 1.31% 0.22% 0.17% 0.22%

C (ii) %age of billing complaints resolved within 4 weeks 95.9% 100.0% 98.2% 39.1% 96.6% 98.9% 80.1%

C (iii) Period of all refunds/ from the date of resolution

Total number of cases where refund was made in <4 weeks 97.2% NR 98.6% 0.0% 96.2% 97.4% 75.4%

Total number of cases where refund was made in <5 weeks 2.8% NR 1.4% 0.0% 3.8% 2.6% 9.6%

Total number of cases where refund was made in <6 weeks 0.0% NR 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.6%

Network and POI Congestion related parameters

D(I) Paging Channel Establishment success rate 94.6% 100.0% 95.6% NR 92.3% 95.9% NR

D(ii) Traffic Channel Establishment success rate 94.9% 100.0% 98.4% NR 97.7% 97.3% 95.4%

E Global Answer Seizure Ratio Incoming 74.0% 50.0% 78.5% 59.8% 76.4% 81.0% 41.7% Outgoing 59.5% 52.4% 62.5% 49.1% 65.9% 59.9% 37.1% Total 64.1% 51.2% 67.8% 53.3% 69.5% 67.1% 38.9%

Page 74: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

83

Annex-II CDMA Operators in A Circle

Oct.03- Dec 03

A.P. AP Gujarat Gujarat Karnataka KarnatakaMaharashtra

Maharashtra T.N. TN

S.no Objective parameters RIL TTL RIL TTL RIL TTL TTL RIL RIL TTL Fault Incidence & repair

A (I) Fault incidences (per100 subscribers/ month) 0.791 0.000 0.970 NA 0.608 0.098 NA 0.947 0.917 0.030

A (ii) Fault cleared in 24 hours 98.0% NR 98.0% NA 99.0% 100.0% NA 99.0% 98.1% 100.0%

A (iii) Accumulated down time of community isolation 10.03 hrs.

4.00 hrs.

10.93 hrs. NA 9.25 hrs. 0.00 hrs. NA

9.27 hrs. 0.00 hrs.

6.13 hrs.

Network performance B (I) Call setup success rate Incoming 99.07% NR 98.71% NA 99.32% 98.59% NA 98.73% 98.55% 98.19% Outgoing 98.46% NR 98.45% NA 98.61% 97.95% NA 98.53% 98.38% 98.37% Total 98.68% 97.67% 98.54% NA 98.89% 98.16% NA 98.59% 98.43% 98.32%

B (ii) Service Access Delay 7.15 to

11.06 sec. NR

7.75 to 11.66 sec. NA

7.29 to 11.05 sec. NR NA

6.65 to 10.57 sec.

6.63 to 10.38 sec. NR

B (iii) Call Drop rate 1.00% 0.73% 0.80% NA 0.76% 0.70% NA 0.81% 0.91% 0.45%

B(iv)

% connections with good voice quality (%age connections with FER)

0-2 98.19% 96.46% 97.98% NA 97.61% 89.99% NA 99.10% 98.51% 84.76% 2-4 0.44% 2.80% 1.92% NA 2.29% 6.74% NA 0.64% 1.39% 12.06% More than 4 1.37% 0.70% 0.09% NA 0.10% 3.27% NA 0.26% 0.11% 3.17%

Page 75: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

84

A CIRCLES (CONTD.)

A.P. AP Gujarat Gujarat Karnataka KarnatakaMaharashtra

Maharashtra T.N. TN

S.no Objective parameters RIL TTL RIL TTL RIL TTL TTL RIL RIL TTL Billing complaints

C(I) Billing complaints per 100 bills issued 0.10% NR 0.18% NA 0.10% 0.18% NA 0.17% 0.11% 0.06%

C (ii) %age of billing complaints resolved within 4 weeks 95.0% NR 99.0% NA 98.6% 96.0% NA 98.9% 95.9% 100.0%

C (iii) Period of all refunds/ from the date of resolution

Total number of cases where refund was made in <4 weeks 96.5% NR 96.0% NA 97.0% 100.0% NA 97.4% 97.2% NR

Total number of cases where refund was made in <5 weeks 2.5% NR 4.0% NA 3.0% 0.0% NA 2.6% 2.8% NR

Total number of cases where refund was made in <6 weeks 1.0% NR 0.0% NA 0.0% 0.0% NA 0.0% 0.0% NR

Network and POI Congestion related parameters

D(I) Paging Channel Establishment success rate 93.1% NR 92.4% NA 92.4% 100.0% NA 92.8% 87.9% 100.0%

D(ii) Traffic Channel Establishment success rate 98.2% NR 97.7% NA 98.3% 100.0% NA 98.1% 96.7% 99.9%

E Global Answer Seizure Ratio Incoming 74.7% 99.9% 77.3% NA 72.6% 55.6% NA 71.3% 72.3% 48.0% Outgoing 61.3% 99.6% 66.3% NA 67.5% 49.9% NA 56.8% 56.2% 48.3% Total 66.0% 99.8% 69.9% NA 69.5% 52.5% NA 61.4% 61.2% 48.2%

Page 76: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

85

Annex-III CDMA Operators in B Circle

Oct.03- Dec 03 Oct.03- Dec 03A.2.3 B CIRCLES Oct.03- Dec 03 Haryana Kerala M.P. Punjab Rajasthan U.P.(E) U.P.(W) W.B. S.no Objective parameters RIL RIL RIL RIL RIL Reliance Reliance Reliance Fault Incidence & repair

A (I) Fault incidences (per100 subscribers/ month) 2.867 0.821 0.970 1.008 0.955 1.344 1.920 2.859

A (ii) Fault cleared in 24 hours 98.1% 98.0% 98.1% 99.0% 98.1% 98.0% 98.1% 98.1%

A (iii) Accumulated down time of community isolation 3.00 hrs. 0.00 hrs.

0.00 hrs. 2.48 hrs. 3.75 hrs. 1.97 hrs. 7.12 hrs. 0.00 hrs.

Network performance B (I) Call setup success rate Incoming 98.81% 98.63% 99.36% 98.61% 98.93% 99.08% 99.27% 99.23% Outgoing 98.59% 98.39% 98.49% 98.45% 98.60% 98.47% 98.49% 98.55% Total 98.65% 98.48% 98.83% 98.50% 98.70% 98.62% 98.72% 98.76%

B (ii) Service Access Delay NR

7.48 to 11.39 sec. NR

6.29 to 10.24 sec.

6.5 to 10.42 sec.

7.25 to 11.16 sec.

7.04 to 10.96 sec.

6.49 to 10.41 sec.

B (iii) Call Drop rate 0.75% 0.99% 0.53% 0.66% 0.59% 1.25% 0.75% 1.18%

B(iv)

% connections with good voice quality (%age connections with FER)

0-2 98.05% 99.20% 94.56% 98.54% 97.84% 95.91% 91.76% 96.67% 2-4 1.95% 0.76% 4.97% 0.97% 2.11% 4.06% 6.99% 3.27% More than 4 0.00% 0.04% 0.47% 0.48% 0.05% 0.03% 1.25% 0.06%

Page 77: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

86

B CIRCLES (CONTD.) Haryana Kerala M.P. Punjab Rajasthan U.P.(E) U.P.(W) W.B. S.no Objective parameters RIL RIL RIL RIL RIL Reliance Reliance Reliance Billing complaints

C(I) Billing complaints per 100 bills issued 0.13% 0.14% 0.12% 0.10% 0.10% 0.10% 0.11% 0.22%

C (ii) %age of billing complaints resolved within 4 weeks 97.8% 97.0% 98.8% 97.4% 98.4% 98.9% 97.3% 96.6%

C (iii) Period of all refunds/ from the date of resolution

Total number of cases where refund was made in <4 weeks 100.0% 100.0% 97.9% 92.9% 95.5% 100.0% 87.5% 96.2%

Total number of cases where refund was made in <5 weeks 0.0% 0.0% 2.1% 7.1% 4.5% 0.0% 12.5% 3.8%

Total number of cases where refund was made in <6 weeks 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Network and POI Congestion related parameters

D(I) Paging Channel Establishment success rate 88.5% 86.6% 90.7% 91.3% 91.1% 88.2% 91.4% 89.0%

D(ii) Traffic Channel Establishment success rate 98.0% 97.5% 98.8% 97.7% 98.3% 97.6% 98.5% 97.5%

E Global Answer Seizure Ratio Incoming 72.2% 72.1% 77.9% 74.2% 75.1% 69.0% 72.0% 71.0% Outgoing 52.8% 64.9% 64.2% 59.1% 54.9% 51.3% 56.1% 62.6% Total 57.9% 67.4% 69.4% 63.8% 61.3% 55.8% 60.8% 65.1%

Page 78: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

87

Annex-IV CDMA Operators in C Circle

Oct.03- Dec 03 A.2.4 C CIRCLES Bihar Orissa S.no Objective parameters Reliance Reliance Fault Incidence & repair A (I) Fault incidences (per100 subscribers/ month) 2.792 1.271 A (ii) Fault cleared in 24 hours 98.0% 98.1% A (iii) Accumulated down time of community isolation 0.00 hrs. 0.00 hrs. Network performance B (I) Call setup success rate Incoming 98.92% 98.38% Outgoing 98.45% 98.61% Total 98.59% 98.55%

B (ii) Service Access Delay 6.45 to 10.37 sec.7.65 to 11.47

sec. B (iii) Call Drop rate 1.66% 0.88% B(iv) % connections with good voice quality (%age connections with FER) 0-2 93.83% 92.62% 2-4 5.93% 7.38% More than 4 0.37% 0.00% Billing complaints C(I) Billing complaints per 100 bills issued 0.08% 0.12% C (ii) %age of billing complaints resolved within 4 weeks 97.1% 97.0% C (iii) Period of all refunds/ from the date of resolution Total number of cases where refund was made in <4 weeks 100.0% 100.0% Total number of cases where refund was made in <5 weeks 0.0% 0.0% Total number of cases where refund was made in <6 weeks 0.0% 0.0% Network and POI Congestion related parameters D(I) Paging Channel Establishment success rate 87.4% 87.6% D(ii) Traffic Channel Establishment success rate 98.2% 98.2% E Global Answer Seizure Ratio Incoming 72.2% 75.7% Outgoing 59.6% 59.4% Total 63.3% 64.2%

Page 79: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

88

Annex-V

CU

STOM

ER SU

RV

EY SC

OR

ES ON

SATISFA

CTIO

N W

ITH SER

VIC

E PRO

VISIO

N – C

DM

A SER

VIC

ES O

ct.’03-Dec.’03

92%

92%

89%

97%

96%

93%

91%

94%

97%

96%

95%

91%

94%

84%

97%

93%

89%

85%

90%

92%

88%

91%

92%

94%

96%

91%

92%

91%

93%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%Chennai Reliance

Chennai Tata

Kolkatta-Reliance

Delhi-Reliance

Delhi-TTL

Mumbai-Reliance

Mumbai-Tata

AP - Reliance

AP-Tata

Gujarat-Reliance

Gujarat-Tata

K’taka-Reliance

K’taka-Tata

M’rastra-Reliance

M’rastra-Tata

TN-Reliance

Haryana-Reliance

Kerela-Reliance

MP-Reliance

Punjab-Reliance

R’sthan-Reliance

R’sthan -STL

UP(East)-Reliance

UP(West)-Reliance

Uttranchal -Reliance

West Bengal -Reliance

Bihar -Reliance

Jharkhand -Reliance

Orissa -Reliance

Page 80: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

89

Annex-V

I C

USTO

MER

SUR

VEY

SCO

RES O

N SA

TISFAC

TION

WITH

NETW

OR

K PER

FOR

MA

NC

E, RELIA

BILITY

AN

D A

VA

ILAB

ILITY –

CD

MA

SERV

ICES

Oct.’03-D

ec.’03

81%

82%

71%

89%

88%

85%

84%

87%

93%

90%

92%

67%

91%

92%

84%

85%

69%

80%

71%

84%

83%

81%

83%

84%

88%

56%

84%

68%

81%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%Chennai Reliance

Chennai Tata

Kolkatta-Reliance

Delhi-Reliance

Delhi-TTL

Mumbai-Reliance

Mumbai-Tata

AP - Reliance

AP-Tata

Gujarat-Reliance

Gujarat-Tata

K’taka-Reliance

K’taka-Tata

M’rastra-Reliance

M’rastra-Tata

TN-Reliance

Haryana-Reliance

Kerela-Reliance

MP-Reliance

Punjab-Reliance

R’sthan-Reliance

R’sthan -STL

UP(East)-Reliance

UP(West)-Reliance

Uttranchal -Reliance

West Bengal -Reliance

Bihar -Reliance

Jharkhand -Reliance

Orissa -Reliance

Page 81: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

90

Annex-V

II C

USTO

MER

SUR

VEY

SCO

RES O

N SA

TISFAC

TION

WITH

MA

INTA

INA

BILITY

– CD

MA

SERV

ICES

Oct.’03-D

ec.’03

81%

83%

53%

86%

84%

84%

83%

85%

64%

85%

93%

65%

91%

70%

54%

70%

76%

71%

63%

81%

77%

68%

82%

73%

70%

67%

76%

90%

71%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Chennai Reliance

Chennai Tata

Kolkatta-Reliance

Delhi-Reliance

Delhi-TTL

Mumbai-Reliance

Mumbai-Tata

AP - Reliance

AP-Tata

Gujarat-Reliance

Gujarat-Tata

K’taka-Reliance

K’taka-Tata

M’rastra-Reliance

M’rastra-Tata

TN-Reliance

Haryana-Reliance

Kerela-Reliance

MP-Reliance

Punjab-Reliance

R’sthan-Reliance

R’sthan -STL

UP(East)-Reliance

UP(West)-Reliance

Uttranchal -Reliance

West Bengal -Reliance

Bihar -Reliance

Jharkhand -Reliance

Orissa -Reliance

Page 82: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

91

A

nnex-VIII

CU

STOM

ER SU

RV

EY SC

OR

ES ON

SATISFA

CTIO

N W

ITH H

ELP SERV

ICES – C

DM

A SER

VIC

ES O

ct.’03-Dec.’03

83%

77%

63%

89%

84%

88%

88%

87%

93%

90%

92%

70%

92%

90%

78%

82%

75%

71%

85%

83%

84%

86%

73%

83%

93%

79%

86%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Chennai Reliance

Chennai Tata

Kolkatta-Reliance

Delhi-Reliance

Delhi-TTL

Mumbai-Reliance

Mumbai-Tata

AP - Reliance

AP-Tata

Gujarat-Reliance

Gujarat-Tata

K’taka-Reliance

K’taka-Tata

M’rastra-Reliance

TN-Reliance

Haryana-Reliance

Kerela-Reliance

MP-Reliance

Punjab-Reliance

R’sthan-Reliance

R’sthan -STL

UP(East)-Reliance

UP(West)-Reliance

Uttranchal -Reliance

West Bengal -Reliance

Bihar -Reliance

Orissa -Reliance

Page 83: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

92

A

nnex-IX

CU

STOM

ER SU

RV

EY SC

OR

ES ON

SATISFA

CTIO

N W

ITH B

ILLING

– CD

MA

SERV

ICES

Oct.’03-D

ec.’03

68%

70%

38%

76%

75%

76%

88%

75%

86%

77%

88%

62%

86%

85%

67%

61%

71%

66%

53%

72%

68%

83%

61%

69%

69%

56%

62%

31%

56%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Chennai Reliance

Chennai Tata

Kolkatta-Reliance

Delhi-Reliance

Delhi-TTL

Mumbai-Reliance

Mumbai-Tata

AP - Reliance

AP-Tata

Gujarat-Reliance

Gujarat-Tata

K’taka-Reliance

K’taka-Tata

M’rastra-Reliance

M’rastra-Tata

TN-Reliance

Haryana-Reliance

Kerela-Reliance

MP-Reliance

Punjab-Reliance

R’sthan-Reliance

R’sthan -STL

UP(East)-Reliance

UP(West)-Reliance

Uttranchal -Reliance

West Bengal -Reliance

Bihar -Reliance

Jharkhand -Reliance

Orissa -Reliance

Page 84: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

93

Annex-X

C

USTO

MER

SUR

VEY

SCO

RES O

N SA

TISFAC

TION

WITH

SUPPLIM

ENTA

RY

SERV

ICE – C

DM

A SER

VIC

ES O

ct.’03-Sept.’03

78%

78%

78%

91%

93%

89%

93%

93%

99%

97%

96%

94%

100%

79%

82%

80%

76%

85%

90%

92%

62%

88%

88%

100%

89%

93%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Chennai Reliance

Chennai Tata

Kolkatta-Reliance

Delhi-Reliance

Delhi-TTL

Mumbai-Reliance

Mumbai-Tata

AP - Reliance

AP-Tata

Gujarat-Reliance

Gujarat-Tata

K’taka-Reliance

K’taka-Tata

M’rastra-Reliance

TN-Reliance

Kerela-Reliance

MP-Reliance

Punjab-Reliance

R’sthan-Reliance

R’sthan -STL

UP(East)-Reliance

UP(West)-Reliance

Uttranchal -Reliance

West Bengal -Reliance

Bihar -Reliance

Orissa -Reliance

Page 85: SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRAI TO ASSESS QOS PROVIDED BY …

94

A

nnex-XI

CU

STOM

ER SU

RV

EY SC

OR

ES ON

SATISFA

CTIO

N W

ITH O

VER

ALL SER

VIC

E – CD

MA

SERV

ICES

Oct.’03-D

ec.’03

78%

78%

60%

83%

84%

82%

88%

85%

93%

79%

89%

67%

94%

90%

69%

68%

67%

72%

56%

72%

72%

78%

64%

73%

74%

60%

80%

60%

67%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Chennai Reliance

Chennai Tata

Kolkatta-Reliance

Delhi-Reliance

Delhi-TTL

Mumbai-Reliance

Mumbai-Tata

AP - Reliance

AP-Tata

Gujarat-Reliance

Gujarat-Tata

K’taka-Reliance

K’taka-Tata

M’rastra-Reliance

M’rastra-Tata

TN-Reliance

Haryana-Reliance

Kerela-Reliance

MP-Reliance

Punjab-Reliance

R’sthan-Reliance

R’sthan -STL

UP(East)-Reliance

UP(West)-Reliance

Uttranchal -Reliance

West Bengal -Reliance

Bihar -Reliance

Jharkhand -Reliance

Orissa -Reliance