Survey of microcontrollers and short- range radio

Survey of microcontrollers and short-

range radio transceivers for wireless

sensors

Bachelor Thesis

Ephrem Zewdu

MID SWEDEN UNIVERSITY Department of Information Technology and Media (ITM) Examiner: Lundgren jan, [email protected] Supervisor: Bengt Oelman, [email protected] Author: Ephrem Zewdu, [email protected] Degree programme: international Bachelor’s Program in Electronics, 180.0 credits Main field of study: Electronics design

iii

Abstract A significant growth was witnessed in the field of Wireless Sensor

Networks (WSNs), in the previous decade. The objective of this study

has been Survey of micro controllers and short-range radio transceivers

for wireless sensors and provide an extensive overview of micro control-

lers and RF-transceivers in the Market and compare the relevant proper-

ties for designing wireless sensor nodes. In the survey, RF-transvers

from Nordic semiconductors is extensively presented for short-rang

wireless protocols some of the protocols are RF-Communication Mod-

ule, Bluetooth Low Energy Module, ZigBee module and Wi-Fi module.

In WSNs node design Power consumption is one the most important

design issue, this thesis work present the different type of WSN proto-

cols energy consumption efficiency and power consumption, compared

and conclude graphically.

Microcontrollers are the main part of WSNs node for processing and

gathering sensor data. There is different microcontroller’s products in

the market however the WSN protocols presented in this thesis uses

Cortex-M4 processor which is one of ARM product, the specification

and comparison of this product with other products is presented.

Keywords: Wireless Sensor Network (WSNs), RF-transceivers, wireless

fidelity (Wi-Fi), Cortex-M4.

iv

Acknowledgements First of all, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisers

Prof.Bengt Oelmann and Prof.Börje Norlin for letting me conduct this

thesis under their supervision.

Many Thanks to a friend Xu Ye who have shared his knowledge and

time to lend a helpful insight and feedback in this Thesis work.

I also would like to use this opportunity to extend my gratefulness to

my family, Friends and all who has been at my side during this thesis

work and the course of my study. All your words and supports have

strengthened me in many ways.

v

Table of Content Abstract ........................................................................................................ iii

Acknowledgements / Foreword ................................................................ iv

Terminology / ............................................................................................. vi

Mathematical Notation

…………………………………………………...viii

1 Introduction (Introduktion) .............................................................. 1

1.1 System Requirment................................................................... 1

1.2 Challenges of

WSN…………………………………………….2Error!

Bookmark not defined.

1.3 Application of WSN ................................................................. 2

1.4 Architecture of WSN ................................................................ 3

2 Theory / RF Communication ............................................................ 4

2.1 BLE (Bluetooth Low Energy Comunication Modules . 8Error!

Bookmark not defined.

2.1.1 ZigBee Communication ............................................................. 9

2.2 Wi-Fi Communication ........... Error! Bookmark not defined.

2.3 Power Consuption .................................................................. 23

2.4 MICROCONTROLLER……………………………………24 2.5 OPERATING SYSTEMS…………………………………...26 3 Methodology ………………………………………………………..28 4 Rusult ……………………………………………….29 5 Conclusion…………………………………………..35 5.1 Future work…………………………………………………36 References …………………………………………………..37

vi

Terminology Acronyms

WSN Wireless sensor Network.

WPAN Wireless personal area network

WLAN Wireless local-area network.

GID Global identification

GPS Global Positioning System

RF Radio Frequency

RX Receive

TX Transmit

ISM Industrial, Scientific, & Medical

ACK Acknowledgemen

GFSK Gaussian frequency shift keying

BPSK Binary phase-shift keying

ASK Amplitude Shift Keying

QPSK Quadrature Phase Shift Keying

CCK Complementary Code Keying

FHSS Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum

DSSS Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum

QFN Quad Flat No-lead package

SPI Serial Peripheral Interface

I²S Integrated Interchip Sound

UART Universal Asynchronous Receiver/Transmitter

https://www.abbreviations.com/term/1836700

vii

NFC Near Field Communication

PPI Programmable Peripheral Interconnect

BLE Bluetooth low Energy

Wi-Fi Wireless Fidelity (IEEE 802.11)

MCU Micro Controller Unit

CPU Central Processing Unit

RAM Random Access Memory

FPU Floating Point Unit

ANT Antenna

SoC System-on-Chip

ARM Advanced RISC Machine

OTA DFU Over-The-Air Device Firmware Upgrade

RSSI Received Signal Strength Indicator

FIFO First In, First Out

GPIO General - Purpose Input/Output

ADC Analog to Digital Converter

DC/DC Direct Current to Direct Current

IoT Internet of Things

IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers

Mathematical notation GHz Giga Hertz

MHz Mega Hertz

kB Kilobyte

viii

Kbps KiloBytes Per Second

Mbps MegaBits Per Second

mA milliampere

Mbps MegaBits Per Second

Ppm Parts Per Million

dBm Decibel relative to one milliwatt

KSPS Kilo Samples Per Second

Title: survey of MCU and short-

range RF- Transceivers for WSN

Author: Ephrem Zewdu

1 Introduction

2020-06-18

1

1 Introduction Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) become very popular in research

topics as they provide a promising platform with a flexible infrastruc-

ture that allows variety of control methods to monitor different applica-

tions in a lot of fields

The typical WSN is composed of two primary components which are:

the node and the base station as indicated in Fig 1[1]

Fig. 1 [1]

In order to define the components of this typical system we have to

know that the node is the device that has the sensor, transceivers and

processing unit that are spread in multiple sites to monitor and gather

information about certain phenomena ,while the base station is the part

of the system that is responsible for collecting the received data from

different nodes and keep them in the system storage based on the pur-

pose of the system more over the base station sometimes can act as a

gateway or router for data to give the data the remote manageability [1]




1 Introduction

2020-06-18

2

The node and the base station are communicating through different

communication channels in order to transfer the gathered information

between them. WSN uses wireless personal area network (WPAN),

Bluetooth, ZigBee and RFID to transfer data between them .different

details will be shown next for each type of these links to have a more

detailed look about these communication links

is urgent because this can lead to a considerable reduction of costs for…,

increased market shares within… and an improved work environment.”

1.1 System Requirements WSN systems have some requirements to ensure the smooth and

flexible operation of the system, the system should have the following

characteristics [2]

1. Affordable: the price of the components of the system must have

low price since the system consists of thousands of nodes that

spread in different location, also the price of the maintenance of

the system should be economic inorder to achieve a realistic de-

ployment

2. Secure: WSN should support the three services for security

which are confidentiality, authenticity, and integrity

3. Programmable: nodes of WSN should have the programming

ability to be able to modify the different functionality of them so

that they can adapt to different operation requirement without

the need to change the whole system

4. Fault tolerance: WSN should be able to handle node failure, also

some kind of alarming mechanism should be available to show

that there is an error at one of the nodes or a communication link

5. Scalable: WSN should support large number of nodes beside

adding extra nodes when needed

6.

1.2 Challenges of WSN With the advancements in electronics components, power resources and

communication links there are many challenges that must be

understood when designing WSN [1]

1. limitation of functions: the nodes of WSN are characterized with

limited resources so a well-designed architecture must be used to

make the most out of these limited resources




1 Introduction

2020-06-18

3

2. Energy limitations: most of the nodes are placed in wide geo-

graphical location or in a remote and hard to reach areas, so

managing the available energy resources on the node must be

deployed in an efficient way to increase the reliability of the node

3. Global identifications: Due to the large number of nodes in

WSN it is hard to make global identification (GID)for nodes, alt-

hough some of the nodes use GPS satellites but this requires line

of site with the sky and this is not available at some of the loca-

tions

4. Latency: WSN should get the readings to be on the system with a

suitable delay for each application, in some applications the con-

tinuous change in the environmental conditions put constraints

on the time delay in order to get readings before getting the read-

ings out of date

1.3 Application of WSN Military application : WSN was initially invented for military applications, it was aiming to give monitoring system for remote areas about the movements of enemies or friendly armies, the usage of WSN in this application will require dense deployment for some nodes so that the damage of some nodes does not make an effect on the military operation [1] Environmental monitoring: this type of applications covers a large geographical area in order to record and monitor physical phenomena like: forest fires, level of carbon dioxide in air which can help in early detection of fire forest in remote areas, the nodes send the recorded and measured data to the central database according to a programmed way Home automation: with technology advancements, nodes with the help of mobile applications can offer extra control over home appliances like vacuum cleaner, air conditioner and microwave oven Medical applications: WSN can be used by attaching a node to a patient to measure his vital processes like heart beat and send it directly to his doctor or health care team within the hospital in order to give live health monitoring to the doctor

1.4 Architecture of WSN WSN consists of three main components which are: wireless link, operating system and sensor nodes (some of them have built-in wireless link) with their circuitry [1]. We will show latest trends in these three components within the next section




2 Theory

2020-06-18

4

2 Theory RF communication [3]

RF communication works basically based on electromagnetic wave.

The wave carries the electromagnetic energy of electromagnetic field

through space. This wave includes different rays like Gamma rays,

ultraviolet, visible light, infrared rays, Microwave rays and Radio Wave.

Usually Radio waves used for wireless communication to carry signals.

RF Transceivers are working in both way as transmitter and receiver in

a single module. Since wireless communication started RF transceivers

has been used. The main purposes of RF transceivers are to exchange

information in the form of Voice, video and data. Which enables us to

transmit them in a wireless medium. One of the important factors in RF

communication is Antenna size. To optimize transmission and receiving

data, an antenna should be where λ is the wave length of the carrier

frequency, the other factor is energy consumption the energy consump-

tion should be as low as possible. RF communication has different

advantages the likes of it is easy to use, its integrality with other devices

and we can find it easily in the market.

Modulation Schema used, Data rate and transmission power affect the

power consumption of Radio. There are four different operation modes

of radios: Transmit, receive, Idle and sleep. From this mode of operation

idle mode consume high power almost equal to receiving mode there-

fore is important shutting down the Radio than leaving it idle.

General operational Modes of RF transceiver: RF transceivers can be

configured to power down, standby, RX and TX mode.

Power down mood: The RF transceiver is switched off by the least

current consumption.

Standby mood I: Standby mode I is used to minimize average current

consumption while maintaining short start up times.

Standby mood II: more current is being used comparing to Standby

mood I.




2 Theory

2020-06-18

5

RX mood: it is an active mood where the transceiver used as a receiver.

TX mood: it is also an active mood used as transmitting packets.

Fe1atures of RF Transceiver [3]

• General

Worldwide 2.4 GHz ISM band operation

Common antenna interface in transmit and receive

GFSK modulation

250kbps, 1 and 2Mbps on air data rate

• TX

Programmable output power: 0, -6, -12 or -18dBm

11.1mA at 0dBm output power

• RX

Fully integrated synthesizer

1 MHz frequency programming resolution

Accepts low cost ±60 ppm 16 MHz crystal

1 MHz non-overlapping channel spacing at 1 Mbps

2 MHz non-overlapping channel spacing at 2 Mbps

• Enhanced ShockBurst™

1 to 32 bytes dynamic payload length

Automatic packet handling (assembly/disassembly)

Automatic packet transaction handling (auto ACK, auto retrans-

mit)

• 6 data pipe MultiCeiver™ for 6:1 star networks




2 Theory

2020-06-18

6

Fig.2 RF transceiver block diagram [3]

There is a number of different RF short range transceivers in the

market for the Likes of nRF24 series and so on and can be given all

details, Tabl.1 shows different Rf24 series and there basic specification

with their prices from Nordic semiconductor.




2 Theory

2020-06-18

7

Table.1 Comparison table of nRF24 series [4]

Part No. Operating

Frequency

Type ISM

Supply

voltage

Operating

Temp

Max.data

rate

Iterface

Type

Packag

e/case

Price

nRF2401A 2.4 GHz 1.9v – 3.6V -40 to+85C 1Mb/s QFN-24 3,53€

nRF24AP1 2.4GHz 1.9v – 3.6V -40 to+85C 1 Mb/s QFN-24 6,82€

nRF24L01+ 2.4GHz 1.9v – 3.6V -40 to+85C 2 Mb/s SPI QFN-20 3,02€

nRF24LE1 2.4GHz 1.9v – 3.6V -40 to+85C 2 Mb/s SPI QFN-24 5,84€

nRF24AP2 2.4GHz 1.9v – 3.6V -40 to+85C 1 Mb/s QFN-32 6,25€

nRF24L01 2.4GHz 1.9v – 3.6V -40 to+85C 8 Mb/s SPI QFN-20 3,28€

nRF2401A 2.4GHz 1.9v – 3.6V -40 to+85C 1 Mb/s QFN-24 3,53€

nRF905 433 MHz

to 915

MHz

1.9v – 3.6V -40 to+85C 50 kb/s SPI QFN-32 3,78€

nRF24LU+ 2.4GHz 4V – 5.25V -40 to+80C 2 Mb/s SPI, UART QFN-32 5,50€




2 Theory

2020-06-18

8

NRf24L01 Transceiver: [5]

NRF24L01 is a single chip radio transceiver developed by Nordic

semiconductor. It Operate in the license-free 2.4GHz – 2.5GHz ISM

band. It supports data rate 250kbps, 1Mbps and 2Mbps. For data rate of

250kbps and 1Mbps the channel bandwidth is approximately 1MHz.

taking the minimum and maximum operating frequencies of 2400MHz

and 2525MHz this gives 125 possible RF channels. However, at Baud of

2Mbps it occupies 2MHz bandwidth so to avoid overlapping channels

and cancels the cross-talk at 2Mbps, it is recommended to keep 2MHz

spacing between channels or more than 2MHz.

The nRF24L01+ transceiver module is the cheapest "2"-way RF solutions.

The voltage operates from 1.9 to 3.6 V, but the logic pins are 5-volt

tolerant, so it can be attached to an Arduino or 5V logic micro-controller

without any level converter. The module withdraws a current of 12 mA

while transmitting that is even lower than one LED. Built-in power

down and standby modes makes power saving easily realizable.

SPI interface [6] nRF2401+ transceiver module communicates over a 4-pin Serial

Peripheral Interface (SPI) with a maximum data rate of 10Mbps.SPI

basically works by the idea of master and slave in most application, the

nRF2401+ works as a slave.

The nRF24L01+ has a feature that is called Multiceiver. It is stands for

Multiple Transmitters Single Receiver. This feature allows each RF

channel with a set of 6 unique addresses data pipes so that each module

can communicate with 6 other modules in the same RF channel

FIG.3 nRF24L01 [6]




2 Theory

2020-06-18

9

2.1 BLE (Bluetooth Low Energy) Communication Modules [7] Bluetooth Low Energy: it is a wireless protocol operating in 2.4

GHz ISM band, since it operates in small coin cell battery, it is

product and application depends on low power consumption.

Over the last couple of years BLE evolves from Bluetooth 4.0 –

Bluetooth 5 and Bluetooth 5.1. BLE helps us to connect devises and

send data wirelessly. We are not only use BLE to connect devices

to smart phone, it gives us a very wide option of connections

wirelessly between two BLE devises, for instance we can use

Bluetooth in Credit cards, sport equipment’s, door locks, automo-

biles, gas sensors, light bulbs and so on.

There is so many options in chip selection of BLE in the market,

in this survey I focus on commonly used, good software support,

Better RF performance and coastwise. Since Nordic semiconductor

has been the best in BLE chips seller in the past year this survey

based on, nRF52810, nRF52811, nRF52832, and nRF52840 chipsets.

This chipset is commonly used in consumers and industrial prod-

uct because of their easiness to use and good SDK support.

DEVELOPMENT TOOLS [8]

Nordic Semiconductor provides a complete range of hardware

and software development tools for the nRF52 Series devices.

SoftDevices [8]

The Nordic protocol stacks are known as SoftDevices and comple-

ment the nRF52 Series SoCs. All nRF52 Series are programmable with

software stacks available from Nordic Semiconductor. This brings

maximum flexibility to application development and allows the latest




2 Theory

2020-06-18

10

stack version to be programmed into the nRF52 Series SoC. In this

survey I focus on nRF52 Series for BLE.

BLE Device Comparison

Table.2. BLE Device comparison [9]

From this Devices I mentioned and compare above the

nRF52832 is the most popular chipsets used in many products. The

extensive study of this module be given under

nRF52832: is a multiprotocol Bluetooth low energy (Bluetooth 5)

ANT/ANT+ and 2.4GHz proprietary System-on-Chip Device. The

nRF52832 is a powerful multiprotocol single chip solution for ULP

wireless applications. It incorporates Nordic’s best-inclass perfor-

mance radio transceiver, an ARM® Cortex™ M4F CPU and 512kB

flash and 64kB RAM memory. The nRF52832 supports Bluetooth®

low energy (Bluetooth 5), ANTTM and 2.4GHz proprietary proto-

col stacks. The device also has a NFC-A tag interface for OOB

pairing. [8]




2 Theory

2020-06-18

11

Lowe power and higher performance: nRF52832 uses the 32-bit

ARM Cortex M4F MCU together with extensive flash availability,

512kB in total with 400kB available for application development.

Speed are considerably greater than for 8/16-bit platforms. The

Programmable Peripheral Interconnect (PPI) system provides a 20-

channel bus for direct and autonomous system peripheral com-

munication without CPU intervention. This brings predictable

latency times for peripheral to peripheral interaction and power

saving benefits associated with leaving the CPU idle. The device

has 2 global power modes ON/OFF, but all system blocks and

peripherals have individual power management control which

allows for an automatic switching RUN/IDLE for system blocks

based only on those required/not required to achieve particular

tasks.

The new radio is designed to support the Bluetooth 5 2Mbs mode.

This means the nRF52832 can be qualified for Bluetooth 5 applica-

tions. It supports Bluetooth low energy (Bluetooth 5), ANT and

proprietary 2.4GHz applications. Output power is programmable

between +4dBm and -20dBm and has receiver sensitivity of -

96dBm for Bluetooth low energy 1Mbs). [8]

OTA DFU: The nRF52832 is supported by an Over-The-Air

Device Firmware Upgrade (OTA DFU) feature. This allows for in

the field updates of application software and Soft Device. Has a

specification of On-air-data rate 2 Mbps and 1 Mbps Bluetooth LE,

1 Mbps ANT, 2 Mbps and 1 Mbps 2.4GHz proprietary [8]




2 Theory

2020-06-18

12

Maximum re-use and easy migration: The nRF52832 have

binary compatible peripherals with the nRF51 Series for most

functions enabling easy migration between older parts and the

new nRF52 Series. The backwards compatibility of most interfaces

and the common SW architecture of the nRF51 Series S130 and the

nRF52 Series S132 SoftDevices ensures that existing codebase for the

nRF51 Series can in very large parts be re-used effortlessly on the nRF52

Series. [8]

nRF52832: KEY FEATURS [8]

• Bluetooth 5 - 2Mbs mode

• 32-bit ARM Cortex M4F processor

• 512kB flash + 64kB RAM

• interface: SPI/2-wire/ I²S/UART/PDM/QDEC

• Application development independent from protocol stack

• Supports 1Mbit and 2Mbit Bluetooth low energy modes

• On-air compatible with nRF51, nRF24AP and nRF24L Series

• Sensitivity of -96 dbm for Bluetooth low energy

• Programmable output power from +4dBm to -20dBm

• RSSI

• RAM mapped FIFOs using EasyDMA

• Dynamic on air payload length up to 256 Bytes

• Flexible and configurable 32 pin GPIO

• Programmable Peripheral Interface – PPI

• Simple ON/OFF global power modes

• 12-bit/200KSPS ADC

• 128-bit AES ECB/CCM/AAR co-processor




2 Theory

2020-06-18

13

• Quadrature demodulator

• Low cost external crystal 32MHz ± 40ppm for Bluetooth,

± 50ppm for ANT

• Single-ended antenna output (On-chip Balun)

• Low power 32MHz crystal and RC oscillators

• Ultra low-power 32kHz crystal and RC oscillators

• Wide supply voltage range (1.7 V to 3.6 V)

• On-chip DC/DC buck converter

• Individual power management for all peripherals

• Package options: 48-pin 6x6 QFN/WL-CSP

Fig.4. nRF52832 [10]




2 Theory

2020-06-18

14

ESP32 [11]

ESP32 chipset includes Wi-Fi, Bluetooth Classic, Bluetooth Low-

Energy, and a 240 MHz microcontroller and it’s still cheaper than

any of the other modules, because of this I included it in this

survey for comparison. It is designed and optimized for the best

power performance, RF performance, robustness, versatility,

features and reliability, for a wide variety of applications and

different power profiles. ESP32 is applicable on Mobile, wearable

electronics and internet of things ((IoT) application.

ESP32-contains dual core low-power Xtensa® 32-bit LX6 micro-

processor. It has two separate processor cores that can be con-

trolled individually.

Clock frequency from 80MHz to 240MHz

Flash memory 16MB

RAM memory 520KB




2 Theory

2020-06-18

15

Fig.5. ESP32 [12]

2.1.1 ZigBee: [13] Zigbee is a standard that specifies the network stack above

802.15.4, there are many stacks based on 802.15.4: Zigbee, XBee,

DigiMesh, Thread, etc. Zigbee only works on 802.15.4. 802.15.4 is a

PAN ("Personal Area Network") technology, features that make it

different from WiFi and Bluetooth is low speed, low energy,

network resilience and extremely simple radio stage.

Zigbee supplies a complete network stack, top to bottom. Even the

application data types and their encodings are rigidly specified. It is

applicable on Smart home, building, industrial, retails, health and more.




2 Theory

2020-06-18

16

Fig.6.Zigbee application layer [14]

NRF52840 SoC is recommended for Zigbee from Nordic semiconduc-

tor. It is a fully multiprotocol capable with full protocol concurrency. It

is Dynamic multi-protocol transceiver support, Bluetooth 5 / Bluetooth

low energy, IEEE 802.15.4/Thread, ANT/ANT, Proprietary 2.4GHz

KeFeatures of nRF52840 [13]

Microprocessor 64 MHz 32-bit Arm Cortex-M4 with FPU

Memory 1 MB Flash + 256 KB RAM

Operating Voltage Range 1.7 -5.5V

On-air data rate 802.15.4: 250 kbps

interface SPI/UART/PWM

Table.3. nRF52840 specifications [13]




2 Theory

2020-06-18

17

2.2 WiFi Communication [15]

Wireless fidelity (Wi-Fi) or by it is Standard IEEE 802.11, first released in

1997 and since then is has been modified many times to achieve high level of

quality of service (QoS) that include IEEE 802.11a/b/g standards for wireless

local area networks (WLAN), this three versions basically function at 2.4GHz

Frequency band for IEEE 802.11b/g and 5GHz Frequency band for IEEE

802.11/a. Wi-Fi use Unlicensed ISM band, its protocol is Spread Spectrum

technique which is open for public use, the problem of Wi-Fi is that it is availa-

ble for public use, when too many devices nearby to a Wi-Fi network can

interfere each other since they use the same Band. To avoid such interference a

5m distance between the devices is recommended. Wi-Fi allows users to surf

the Internet at broadband speeds when connected to an access point

(AP) or in ad hoc mode. Next, we will see some of the communication

modules of Wi-Fi. In this survey I will present Wi-Fi module form ESPRESSIF

vendor. Espressif offer wide range of fully-certified Wi-Fi and BT SoC mod-

ules.

Dual-core, single-core and single-core with 802.11b/g/n 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi are some of the module ESPRESSIF provide. DUAL-CORE: Features [16]

• Has two independently-controlled CPU cores with adjustable clock fre-

quency, ranging from 80 MHz to 240 MHz

• +19.5 dBm output at the antenna ensures a good physical range

• Sleep current is less than 5 μA, making it suitable for battery-powered

and wearable-electronics applications.

• Integrates 4 MB flash.

• Peripherals include capacitive touch sensors, Hall sensor, low-noise

sense amplifiers, SD card interface, Ethernet, high-speed SPI, UART,

I2S and I2C

• Fully certified with integrated antenna and software stacks




2 Theory

2020-06-18

18

Table.4. Dual-Core ESP32 [16]




2 Theory

2020-06-18

19

SINGLE-CORE: Features [16]

• High-performance 160 MHz single-core CPU



and wearable-electronics applications

• Peripherals include capacitive touch sensors, Hall sensor, low-noise

sense amplifiers, SD card interface, Ethernet, high-speed SPI, UART,

I2S and I2C

• Fully certified with integrated antenna and software stacks

Table.5. Single Core ESP32 [16]

SINGLE-CORE MODULES WITH 802.11b/g/n 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi: Features

• High-performance 160 MHz single-core CPU



and wearable-electronics applications

• Peripherals include UART, GPIO, I2C, I2S, SDIO, PWM, ADC and SPI

• Fully certified with integrated antenna and software stacks [16]




2 Theory

2020-06-18

20

Table.6. Single-core with 802.11b/g/n 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi [16]




2 Theory

2020-06-18

21

ESP8266 WiFi Module [17]

ESP8266 is a complete and self-contained Wi-Fi network solutions that can

carry software applications, it is a single-core Soc, it is applicable especially for

mobile platform designers, provide an excellent capability to embed Wi-Fi

with in other systems at low cost with greatest functionality.is around 6$.

ESP8266 has a Built-in cache memory which will help improve system perfor-

mance and reduce memory requirements and we can add it to any microcon-

troller-based design, the connection is simple, just by SPI / SDIO interface or

central processor AHB bridge interface. It can be integrated via GPIO ports,

ESP8266 is highly integrated chip, including antenna switch balun, power

management converter, it requires minimal external circuitry and includes

front-end module, The system equipped with ESP8266 manifested leading

features are: energy saving VoIP, quickly switch between the sleep / wake

patterns, with low-power operation adaptive radio bias, front-end signal

processing functions, troubleshooting and radio systems coexist features for

common cellular / Bluetooth / DDR / LVDS / LCD interference.

Ultra-low power technology [17] ESP8266 specifically for mobile devices, wearable electronics and networking

applications design and make the machine to achieve the lowest energy con-

sumption, together with several other patented technology. This energy-

efficient constructed in three modes: active mode, sleep mode and deep sleep

mode type. ESP8266 use high-end power management technology and logic

systems to reduce non-essential functions of the power conversion between

sleep patterns and work modes, in sleep mode it consumes less than 12uA

current. Through programming, ESP8266 will automatically wake up when

specific condition detected. ESP8266 automatic wake-up in the shortest time.

INTERFACE

ESP8266 contains multiple analog and digital interfaces, as follows:

Main SI / SPI control (optional)

Main Serial Interface (SI) can run at two, three, four-wire bus configura-

tion, is used to control the EEPROM or other I2C / SPI devices. Multiple

devices share the two-wire I2C bus. Multiple SPI devices to share the

clock and data signals, according to the chip select, each controlled by

software alone GPIO pins. SPI can be used to control external devices,




2 Theory

2020-06-18

22

such as serial flash, audio CODEC or other slave devices, installation,

effectively giving it three different pins, making it the standard master

SPI device.

• SPI_EN0

• SPI_EN1

• SPI_EN2

FEATURES OF ESP8266: [17]

• 802.11 b/g/n protocol

• Wi-Fi Direct (P2P), soft-AP

• Integrated TCP/IP protocol stack

• Frequency range 2.412GHz – 2.484GHz

• Working voltage 3.3V-3.6V

• Power down leakage current of < 10uA

• Integrated low power 32-bit CPU could be used as application

processor

• SDIO 2.0, SPI, UART

• Wake up and transmit packets in < 2ms

• Standby power consumption of < 1.0mW (DTIM3)

• Supports antenna diversity.




2 Theory

2020-06-18

23

2.3 POWER CONSUMPTION: [15]

The two aspects in WSN, regarding power consumption is the power

flow optimization between the storage elements (battery and supper-

capacities) and the power management related to the wireless transmis-

sion and successive functional stage of the micro-controllers and sensor

transceivers.

ZigBee and Bluetooth LE mainly designed for portable devices and

limited battery power because of this they have low power consump-

tion, there for they are not affected significantly their battery life time.

Wi-Fi is considered for a longer connection and support devices with a

considerable power supply. Normally Wi-Fi is for bulk traffic transfer at

high speed. Even if ZigBee and BLE protocols consume less power, Wi-

Fi have a better energy consumption efficiency. Here under we will see

graphically the different of power consumption and energy consump-

tion efficiency for each protocol. The graph shows BL and ZigBee have a

very low power consumption comparing with Wi-Fi.

Fig.7.Comparison of Power Consuption [15]




2 Theory

2020-06-18

24

The graph below shows Wi-Fi have a considerable better energy

consumption efficiency per bit than BL and ZigBee

Fig.8. Comparison of Energy consumption efficiency [15]

2.4 MICROCONTROLLER:

Microcontrollers perform the main task in sensor nodes since sensor

nods expect to be communicate. For processing and gathering sensor

data, sensor nods should have processing unite with better energy

consumption and computational capability of data with different opera-

tional modes. Generally, microcontrollers include not only memory and

processor unit but also non-volatile memory and different interfaces

such as UART, USB, SPI and I2C, and peripherals such as A/D Convert-

ers (ADCs), counters and timers because of this MUC can easily inter-

face with digital and along sensors. Microprocessors and programmable

logic allow great flexibility for CPU implementations.

There is a number of microcontrollers in the market which is used for

wireless sensor network from 4 – 32 bits. PIC MUC, 80551 MUC, AVR

MUC are 8-bit microcontroller.

The Texas Instruments MSP430F169 is a 16-bit, 8 MIPS, and ultra-low

power CPU. It has 60Kbytes of program memory and 2Kbytes of data

memory and The Motorola DragonBall MC9328MX1 is a 32-bit CPU

with a Bluetooth Accelerator radio interface, an Analog Signal Pro-

cessing (ASP) Module, a Multimedia Accelerator (MMA), and a DPLL

Clock and Power Control Module that provides power management

capabilities.




2 Theory

2020-06-18

25

The three-wireless protocol in this survey use a microcontroller ARM

CORTEX-M4 processor which is one of ARM CORTEX-M series, this

series was released a few years ago, ARM CORTEX-M processor family

is optimized for energy-efficient microcontrollers and found in many

applications like in IoT, industrial and consumer devices.

This processor family is based on the M-profile Architecture that

provides low-latency and have high accurate performance for deeply

embedded system. Cortex-M55 is the latest in the market which is built

on Armv8.1-M architecture with Arm Helium technology. The series

start from Cortex-M0 processor, Cortex-M0 is the smallest Arm

processor.

ARM CORTEX-M4: is designed to address digital signal that demands

an efficient, easy to use and signal processing capabilities. The benefit of

ARM CORTEX-M4 is highly efficient signal processing functionality

with low power and low cost this satisfy to be choices for the above

wireless protocol. ARM CORTEX-M4 core with FPU is the latest

generation of ARM processor for embedded system. It has low cost and

low power consumption with small number of pin count this satisfy the

need of MCU implementation. ARM CORTEX-M4 is built on Armv7E-M architecture.

Architecture Armv7E-M

Bus Interface 3x AMBA AHB-Lite interface (Harvard bus architecture) AMBA ATB interface for CoreSight debug components

ISA Support Thumb/Thumb-2

Pipeline 3-stage + branch speculation

DSP Extension Single cycle 16/32-bit MAC Single cycle dual 16-bit MAC 8/16-bit SIMD arithmetic Hardware Divide (2-12 Cycles)

Floating-Point Unit Optional single precision floating point unit IEEE 754 compliant

Memory Protection Optional 8 region MPU with sub regions and background region

Bit Manipulation Integrated Bit Field Processing Instructions & Bus Level Bit Banding

Interrupts Non-maskable Interrupt (NMI) + 1 to 240 physical interrupts

https://developer.arm.com/architectures/system-architectures/amba/amba-3

https://developer.arm.com/architectures/system-architectures/amba/amba-4

https://developer.arm.com/architectures/instruction-sets




2 Theory

2020-06-18

26

Interrupt Priority Levels

8 to 256 priority levels

Wake-up Interrupt Controller

Optional

Sleep Modes Integrated WFI and WFE Instructions and Sleep On Exit capability Sleep & Deep Sleep Signals Optional Retention Mode with Arm Power Management Kit

Debug Optional JTAG and Serial Wire Debug ports. Up to 8 Breakpoints and 4 Watchpoints

Trace Optional Instruction Trace (ETM), Data Trace (DWT), and Instrumentation Trace (ITM)

Table.7. ARM CORTEX-M4 Specification Table

2.5 Operating system TinyOS [18] TinyOS is a tiny microthreaded OS that attempts to address two issues:

how to guarantee concurrent data flows among hardware devices, and

how to provide modularized components with little processing and

storage overhead. TinyOS uses an vent-based model to support high

levels of concurrent application in a very small amount of memory.

Compared with a stack-based threaded approach, which would require

that stack space be reserved for each execution context, and because the

switching rate of execution context is slower than in an event-based

approach, TinyOS achieves higher throughput. It canrapidly create tasks

associated with an event, with noblocking or polling. When CPU is idle,

the process is maintained in a sleep state to conserve energy

TinyOS has a component-based programmingmodel, codified by the

nesC language. his WNS operating system defines three types of com-

ponents: hardware abstractions, synthetic hardware, and high-level

software components.

Contiki OS [18] The Contiki operating system is an open source operating system for

networked embedded systems in general, and wireless sensor nodes in

particular.

Contiki system consists of the kernel, libraries, the program loader, and

a set of processes. Communication between processes always goes

through the kernel, which does not provide a hardware abstraction

https://developer.arm.com/architectures/cpu-architecture/debug-visibility-and-trace/coresight-architecture/serial-wire-debug

https://developer.arm.com/ip-products/system-ip/coresight-debug-and-trace/coresight-components/system-trace-macrocell






2 Theory

2020-06-18

27

layer, but lets device drivers and applications communicate directly

with the hardware . Both the Contiki system and applications for the

system are implemented in the C programming language. Because

Contiki is implemented in C, it is highly portable. Contiki has been

ported to a number of microcontroller architectures, including the Texas

Instruments MSP430 and the Atmel AVR

Lite OS [18] Lite OS is designed to provide a traditional Unix-like environment for

programming WSN applications, it partitioned into three subsystems:

Lite Shell, Lite FS, and the Kernel. Implemented on the base station PC

side, the Lite Shell subsystem interacts with sensor nodes (motes) only

when a user is present .Lite OS 2.0 is closely integrated with AVR Studio

5.0. This brings multiple advantages, such as IDE editing, debugging,

and built-in JTAG support. LiteOS also supports software updates

through a separation between the kernel and user applications, which

are bridged through a suite of system calls.




3 Methodology

2020-06-18

28

3 Methodology This survey was done by referring different Study papers, I have been

trying to refer recently done Study papers since WSNs technology have

a lot of development throw time, to make sure the specifications are

precise I have been referred Datasheet form product developers and

producers.




4 Results

2020-06-18

29

4 Results Over all comparison of Bluetooth, Zigbee and Wi-Fi protocols!

Standard Bluetooth Zig bee Wi-Fi

IEEE spec. 802.15.1 802.15.4 802.11a/b/g

Frequency band 2.4 GHz 868/915MHz;2.4

GHz 2.4 GHz; 5 GHz

Max signal rate 1Mb/s 250Kb/s 54Mb/s

Nominal range 10m 10–100 m 100 m

Nominal TX power 0–10 dBm (™25)– 0 dBm 15–20 dBm

Number of RF channels 79 1/10;16 14 (2.4 GHz)

Channel bandwidth 1 MHz 0.3/0.6MHz; 2 MHz 22 MHz

Modulation type GFSK BPSK (+ ASK), O-

QPSK BPSK,

QPSK,COFDM,

CCK, M-QAM

Network size

8 65000 2007

Data protection 16-bit CRC 16-bit CRC 32-bit CRC

Power Consumption Medium Very low High

Network topology A-hoc,small

network

Peertopeer,star or

mesh

Point to point

Spreading FHSS DSSS DSSS

Table.8. Comparison of Bluetooth, Zigbee and Wi-Fi protocols




4 Results

2020-06-18

30

Power consumption

Table.9. Power consumption comparison for selected protocols [19]

Standard RF

NRf24L01

Bluetooth

NRF52832

Zig bee

nRF52840

Wi-Fi

ESP8266

Standard Nrf24 Nrf52 Nrf52 Wi-Fib/g/n

Frequency band 2.4GHz 2.4GHz 2.4GHz 2.412GHz- 2.484GHz

Max signal rate 2 Mb/s 1Mb/s 250Kb/s 54Mb/s

Nominal range 15m-60m 10M 10M-100M 100M

Nominal current 50mA 80mA

Supply voltage 1.9v – 3.6V 1.7V – 3.6V 1.7v - 5.5v 3.3V -3.6V

CPU N/A 64 MHZ ARM

Cortex M4

64 MHZ ARM

Cortex M4

ULP 32-bit cpu

Memory N/A Flash 256/512KB

RAM 32/64KB

Flash 1MB

RAM 256KB

N/A

Table.10. Comparison of selected chips form all protocols

ZigBee BLE Wi-Fi




4 Results

2020-06-18

31

Current and power consumption comparison from selected chip

NRF24L01 [6]

Standby-1-------26μA

Power down----900nA

Rx mode---------13.5mA@2Mbps

Tx mode-------- 11.3mA@0dBm

Power consumption ----60mW

Pow.Effciency------------2.48 µW/bit

NRF52832 [20]

Tx mode--------- 5.3mA peak current (0dBm)

Rx mode---------5.4mA peak current in Rx.

Power and clock management in nRF52832: the main point of power

and clock management system in nRF52832 is the power management

unit (PWM)

Fig.9. Power management unit

The user application is not required to actively control power and clock,

since the PMU is able to automatically detect which resources are re-

quired by the different components in the system at any given time. The

mailto:mode---------13.5mA@2Mbps

mailto:11.3mA@0dBm




4 Results

2020-06-18

32

PMU will continuously optimize the system based on this information to achieve the lowest power consumption possible without user interac-

tion.

There is different current consumption scenarios as the system being

constantly tuned by the PMW, knowing the energy consumption of an

application can be challenging if the designer is not able to do meas-

urements on the hardware directly.

Table.11. Current consumption scenarios, common conditions




4 Results

2020-06-18

33

nRF52840

Compound current consumption of nRF52840: estimating the current

consumption of an application can be challenging if the designer is not

able to perform measurements directly on the hardware. To facilitate the

estimation process, a set of current consumption scenarios are provided

to show the typical current drawn from the VDD supply. Each scenario

specifies a set of operations and conditions applying to the given scenar-

io.

Table.12.Compound current consumption of nRF52840 [21]




4 Results

2020-06-18

34

ESP8266 power consumption [22]

Table.13.Test data of power consumption of ESP8266

Currently ESP8266 can support three low power mode: Light

sleep, Modem Sleep and Deep Sleep.




4 Results

2020-06-18

35

5 Conclusions This survey gives a broad overview of some of known RF communi-

cation technology like RF, BLE, ZigBee and Wi-Fi, with a comparison in

terms of specification some of the specification are stable and well

defined by the standard, others such as power consumption and energy

efficiency are open challenge and throw time the technology is improv-

ing this aspect. It is difficult to give a single conclusion comparing

which one is better than the other, we can say Wi-Fi and Bluetooth LE

provide higher data rate, while ZigBee gives us lower data rate, Gener-

ally ZigBee and Bluetooth LE intended for WPAN communication and

Wi-Fi is for WLAN in about 100m how ever in some application ZigBee

can reach 100m range. Regarding power consumption and Energy

Efficiency we can look the table and graph in the theory.

The suitability of WSN protocols are highly regarded by the Applica-

tion we choice to implement but as I give a comparison table for each

protocol, which chipset set is better depend on application we are doing

and cost wise, for RF communication the nRF24L01 chipset is recom-

mended, for Bluetooth LE the nRF52832 is the popular chipset, there is

ESP32 chipset for this protocol which have a lot of good features but the

power consumption is around 100mA when using BLE radio this is over

10 times the current consumption that other BLE chips consume, for

ZigBee the nRF52840 is recommended for its dynamism of support

other protocols. For Wi-Fi, ESP8266 is recommended because of it is

functionality and lower cost.

Microcontrollers: there is a lot of options in the market to select

microcontrollers for WSN, in this survey I have been focused on one

ARM microcontroller product ARM CORTEX-M4.




4 Results

2020-06-18

36

5.1 Future work The survey focused on some of the common RF transceivers for

short-range WSN technologies, there is a lot of RF transceivers and WSN

protocols that can be considered, those are some of the protocols that

can be seen in the future, Z-wave, NFC, HomePlug GP and UWB

(Ultra-wideband) is recently have got a lot of attention in the market for

un indoor short-range high speed wireless communication since it use a

very low energy. Regarding RF transceivers there is plenty of options

from Texas instrument, CC1101, CC2500, CC120 and many other

products can be included. The same for microcontrollers there is

different type of MUC that I mentioned in the theory can be presented

extensively in the future

Terminology

2020-06-18

37

References Here follows an example of an automatically numbered list of references

according to the numbered list and cross references method, as de-

scribed in chapters 2.4:

[1] Pule, Mompoloki, y Yahya, Abid, y Chuma, Joseph, y "Wireless

sensor networks: A survey on monitoring water quality." Journal

of Applied Research and Technology, vol. 15, no. 6, 2017

[2] Potdar, Vidyasagar & Sharif, Atif & Chang, Elizabeth. (2009).

Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey. Proceedings - International

Conference on Advanced Information Networking and

Applications, AINA. 636-641. 10.1109/WAINA.2009.192.

[3] Nordic semiconductor ,” nRF24L01+Single Chip 2.4GHz Transceiver

“Preliminary Product Specification v1.0,March 2008

[4] https://eu.mouser.com/Nordic-

Semiconductor/Semiconductors/Wireless-RF-Integrated-

Circuits/RF-Transceiver/_/N-

3ri0rZ1yzvvqxZscv7?P=1yzrqvv&fbclid=IwAR00YVbQ6b_OqCcr

CUw66XVGVFuG-O9kOUE4YZ0jIGf4UVIrm-xw52DyAzc

[5] Preliminary Product Specification: Revision Date: 08.03.2006.

Data sheet order code: 080306-nRF24L01

[6] https://lastminuteengineers.com/nrf24l01-arduino-wireless-

communication/

[7] https://www.nordicsemi.com/Products/Low-power-short-range-

wireless/Bluetooth-5

[8] https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/pdf/nRF52832_PB_v1.7.pdf

[9] https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/struct_nrf52/struct/nrf52.

html

[10] https://www.aliexpress.com/item/32865934996.html

https://eu.mouser.com/Nordic-Semiconductor/Semiconductors/Wireless-RF-Integrated-Circuits/RF-Transceiver/_/N-3ri0rZ1yzvvqxZscv7?P=1yzrqvv&fbclid=IwAR00YVbQ6b_OqCcrCUw66XVGVFuG-O9kOUE4YZ0jIGf4UVIrm-xw52DyAzc





https://lastminuteengineers.com/nrf24l01-arduino-wireless-communication/

https://lastminuteengineers.com/nrf24l01-arduino-wireless-communication/

https://www.nordicsemi.com/Products/Low-power-short-range-wireless/Bluetooth-5

https://www.nordicsemi.com/Products/Low-power-short-range-wireless/Bluetooth-5

https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/pdf/nRF52832_PB_v1.7.pdf

https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/struct_nrf52/struct/nrf52.html

https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/struct_nrf52/struct/nrf52.html

https://www.aliexpress.com/item/32865934996.html

Terminology

2020-06-18

38

[11] https://www.espressif.com/sites/default/files/documentation/esp3

2_datasheet_en.pdf

[12] https://www.makershop.de/plattformen/nodemcu/espressif-

esp32-dev-kit-board/

[13] https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/topic/struct_nrf52/struct/nrf528

40.html

[14] https://www.nordicsemi.com/Products/Low-power-short-range-

wireless/Zigbee

[15] J. Lee, Y. Su and C. Shen, "A Comparative Study of Wireless Protocols: Bluetooth, UWB, ZigBee, and Wi-Fi," IECON 2007 - 33rd Annual Con-ference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Taipei, 2007, pp. 46-51.

[16] https://www.espressif.com/en/products/hardware/modules

[17] https://cdn-shop.adafruit.com/product-files/2471/0A-

ESP8266__Datasheet__EN_v4.3.pdf

[18] Farooq, Muhammad & Kunz, T.. (2011). Operating Systems for Wire-less Sensor Networks: A Survey. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). 11. 5900-30.

[19] Borza, P.N.; Machedon-Pisu, M.; Hamza-Lup, F. Design of Wireless Sensors for IoT with Energy Storage and Communication Channel Heterogeneity. Sensors 2019, 19, 3364.

[20] https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/index.jsp?topic=%252Fcom.nor

dic.infocenter.nrf52%252Fdita%252Fnrf52%252Fchips%252Fnrf52

832_ps.html

[21] https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/index.jsp?topic=%252Fcom.nor

dic.infocenter.nrf52%252Fdita%252Fnrf52%252Fchips%252Fnrf52

832_ps.html

[22] https://bbs.espressif.com/viewtopic.php?t=133

https://www.espressif.com/sites/default/files/documentation/esp32_datasheet_en.pdf

https://www.espressif.com/sites/default/files/documentation/esp32_datasheet_en.pdf

https://www.makershop.de/plattformen/nodemcu/espressif-esp32-dev-kit-board/

https://www.makershop.de/plattformen/nodemcu/espressif-esp32-dev-kit-board/

https://www.nordicsemi.com/Products/Low-power-short-range-wireless/Zigbee

https://www.nordicsemi.com/Products/Low-power-short-range-wireless/Zigbee

https://www.espressif.com/en/products/hardware/modules

https://cdn-shop.adafruit.com/product-files/2471/0A-ESP8266__Datasheet__EN_v4.3.pdf

https://cdn-shop.adafruit.com/product-files/2471/0A-ESP8266__Datasheet__EN_v4.3.pdf

https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/index.jsp?topic=%252Fcom.nordic.infocenter.nrf52%252Fdita%252Fnrf52%252Fchips%252Fnrf52832_ps.html






https://bbs.espressif.com/viewtopic.php?t=133

Documents

Survey of microcontrollers and short- range radio