Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Bank Sarasin & Co. Ltd
Sustainability ratingof sovereign bonds
Balazs MagyarSarasin Sustainable Investment
Footprint Forum 2010Colle di Val d’Elsa, June 2010
2
Swiss Private Bank, founded in 1841Specialised in asset management and private bankingEUR 63.2 billion of assets-under-management, more than 1,500 employees
Sustainable asset management since 1989Broad range of asset classes (bond, equity, real estate, etc.)EUR 8 billion of assets-under-management, approx. 50 employees
Sustainability assessment of countries / sovereign bonds since 2003
Sarasin Sustainable Investment: Bank Sarasin & Co Ltd. –a highly regarded Swiss private bank
3
Sovereign bonds
Investor Government
one-off payment
today
EconomicActivities
government spending
tax revenue
Debt repayment requires sustainable tax revenues
interest and principal payments
in the future
4
Economic activity
Sustainable tax revenues require sustainable economic activities
(Limited) Resources
Qualityof life
Economic system
Transformation efficiency
Process efficiency
5
Sustainability rating ofsovereign bonds 2010
Assessment of emerging and developed countries for the first time on the basis of the same indicators:
Over 150 countriesAbout 50 indicators in the fields of:
– Environment– Economy– Social
Focus of analysis:– Availability of resources
• mainly natural resources• but also human and financial res.
– Efficiency• in transforming resources into quality of life• of the economic, political and social processes
Res
ourc
e ef
ficie
ncy
Availability of resources
Sarasin Sustainability-Matrix®
6
Availability of resources –horizontal axis
EnvironmentBiocapacity (absolute and relative tothe Ecological Footprint of production)Nuclear powerWater scarcityBiodiversityClimate change risks(extreme weather events, agriculture, sea level rise)
Society & economyDemographyWealth (tangible and intangible capital)Public debtNet foreign assets
not covered directly bythe Ecological Footprint
Availability of resources
Res
ourc
e ef
ficie
ncy
low high
low
high
7
Availability of resources –horizontal axis
EnvironmentBiocapacity (absolute and relative tothe Ecological Footprint of production)Nuclear powerWater scarcityBiodiversityClimate change risks(extreme weather events, agriculture, sea level rise)
Society & economyDemographyWealth (tangible and intangible capital)Public debtNet foreign assets
not covered directly bythe Ecological Footprint
Availability of resources
Res
ourc
e ef
ficie
ncy
low high
low
high
8
Mediterranean countries haveecological deficits in their production
Reserve
Deficit
Source: Global Footprint Network (as of 2006)Mediterranean countries are marked with solid bars.
Isra
el
Alba
nia
Kuwa
itUn
. Ara
b Em
.
Gree
ceIta
ly
Slov
enia
Turk
ey
Ecua
dor
Swed
enBo
livia
Mor
occo
Spai
n
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
Glob
al h
ecta
res
per p
erso
n
9
Water footprint exceeds or approaches renewablewater resources in most Mediterranean countries
Source: Water Footprint Network, Sarasin (as of 2001)Mediterranean countries are marked with solid bars.
Jord
an
Alb
ania
Mal
ta
Con
go, R
ep.
Ecu
ador
Cro
atia
Sw
eden
Slo
veni
a
Gre
ece
Turk
ey
Italy
Kuw
ait
Un.
Ara
b E
m.0
100
200
300
400
500
Wat
er fo
otpr
int i
n %
of R
WR
10,8
952,
329
1,79
31,
478
713
514
10
Availability of resources –horizontal axis
EnvironmentBiocapacity (absolute and relative tothe Ecological Footprint of production)Nuclear powerWater scarcityBiodiversityClimate change risks(extreme weather events, agriculture, sea level rise)
Society & economyDemographyWealth (tangible and intangible capital)Public debtNet foreign assets
not covered directly bythe Ecological Footprint
Availability of resources
Res
ourc
e ef
ficie
ncy
low high
low
high
11
0102030405060708090
100110
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10%
Share of population
Age
(5-ye
ar g
roup
s)
Greece
Slovenia
Optimum
Italy
Turkey
2050
Many Mediterranean countriesare affected by population ageing
Source: UN, Sarasin
0102030405060708090
100110
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10%
Share of population
Age
(5-ye
ar g
roup
s)
Greece
Slovenia
Optimum
Italy
Turkey
2010
0102030405060708090
100110
0% 5% 10% 15% 20%
Share of population
Age
(5-ye
ar g
roup
s)
Ecuador
Sweden
Optimum
United Arab Emirates
Uganda
2010
0102030405060708090
100110
0% 5% 10% 15% 20%
Share of population
Age
(5-ye
ar g
roup
s)
Ecuador
Sweden
Optimum
United Arab Emirates
Uganda
2050
12
High foreign and public debt levels meanconceding future resources to someone else
Source: IMF, OECD, CIA, Sarasin (as of 2008)Mediterranean countries are marked with solid diamonds.
Zimbabwe
Qatar
Japan
Un. Arab Em.Sweden
Ecuador
Jordan
SloveniaTurkey
GreeceItaly
0
50
100
150
200
-150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150
Foreign debt (net, % of GDP)
Publ
ic d
ebt (
gros
s, %
of G
DP)
13
Resource efficiency –vertical axis
Transformation efficiencyQuality of life
– Material well-being (GDP)– Education– Health
Resource consumption– Ecological Footprint of consumption– Nuclear power– Water consumption
Process efficiencyEconomic structure(industrial heterogeneity, inflation, adj. savings, etc.)Governance(political stability, corruption, etc.)Social conditions(income equality, gender empowerment, etc.)
deviation from the norm
Availability of resources
Res
ourc
eef
ficie
ncy
low high
low
high
14
Resource efficiency –vertical axis
Transformation efficiencyQuality of life
– Material well-being (GDP)– Education– Health
Resource consumption– Ecological Footprint of consumption– Nuclear power– Water consumption
Process efficiencyEconomic structure(industrial heterogeneity, inflation, adj. savings, etc.)Governance(political stability, corruption, etc.)Social conditions(income equality, gender empowerment, etc.)
deviation from the norm
Availability of resources
Res
ourc
eef
ficie
ncy
low high
low
high
15
Mediterranean countries transform natural resourcesinto quality of life only with medium efficiency
Source: IMF, OECD, CIA, Sarasin (as of 2008)Mediterranean countries are marked with solid diamonds.
Mali
Netherlands
Ecuador
Un. Arab Em.Sweden
Cyprus
Turkey
Slovenia
ItalyGreece
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Resource consumption
Qual
ity o
f life
high middle
low
16
Resource efficiency –vertical axis
Transformation efficiencyQuality of life
– Material well-being (GDP)– Education– Health
Resource consumption– Ecological Footprint of consumption– Nuclear power– Water consumption
Process efficiencyEconomic structure(industrial heterogeneity, inflation, adj. savings, etc.)Governance(political stability, corruption, etc.)Social conditions(income equality, gender empowerment, etc.)
deviation from the norm
Availability of resources
Res
ourc
eef
ficie
ncy
low high
low
high
17
Economic, political and socialprocesses show a high dispersion
Source: IMF, OECD, CIA, Sarasin (as of 2008)Mediterranean countries are marked with solid bars.
Fran
ceSw
eden
Denm
ark
Italy
Slov
enia
Gree
ce
Turk
eyUn
. Ara
b Em
.
Zim
babw
e
Ecua
dor
Syria
Alge
ria
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
In %
of t
he h
ighe
st ra
ting Social
GovernmentalEconomic
18
Sarasin Sustainability-Matrix®
for sovereign bonds
Availability of resources
Res
ourc
e ef
ficie
ncy
low high
low
high
19
Sarasin Sustainability-Matrix®
for sovereign bonds
Mediterranean countries are marked with solid diamonds. Source: Sarasin
Zimbabwe
Australia
JapanNetherlands
Ecuador
Sweden
UAE
Greece
Italy
Slovenia
Turkey
Availability of resources
Reso
urce
effi
cien
cy
low high
low
high
20
Sarasin Sustainability-Matrix®
for sovereign bonds
Source: Global Footprint Network, Sarasin
Ecuador
Sweden
UAE
Greece
Italy
Slovenia
Turkey
Availability of resources
Reso
urce
effi
cien
cy
local and globalonly localonly globalno reserve
Ecologicalreserve:
low high
low
high
21
Important Information
This publication has been prepared by Bank Sarasin & Co. Ltd, Switzerland, (hereafter “BSC”) for information purposes only. It contains selected information and does not purport to be complete. This document is based on publicly available information and data (“the Information”) believed to be correct, accurate and complete. BSC has not verified and is unable to guarantee the accuracy and completeness of the Information contained herein. Possible errors or incompleteness of the Information do not constitute legal grounds (contractual or tacit) for liability, either with regard to direct, indirect or consequential damages. In particular, neither BSC nor its shareholders and employees shall be liable for the opinions, estimations and strategies contained in this document. The opinions expressed in this document, along with the quoted figures, data and forecasts, are subject to change without notice. A positive historical performance or simulation does not constitute any guarantee for a positive performance in the future. Discrepancies may emerge in respect of our own financial research or other publications of the Sarasin Group relating to the same financial instruments or issuers. It is impossible to rule out the possibility that a business connection may exist between a company which is the subject of research and a company within the Sarasin Group, from which a potential conflict of interest could result. This document does not constitute either a request or offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell investments or other specific financial instruments, products or services. It should not be considered as a substitute for individual advice and risk disclosure by a qualified financial, legal or tax advisor.This document is intended for persons working in countries where the Sarasin Group has a business presence. BSC does not accept any liability whatsoever for losses arising from the use of the Information (or parts thereof) contained in this document. © 2009 Copyright Bank Sarasin & Co. Ltd. All rights reserved.
23
Sarasin sustainability assessment –Country profile of Greece
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Greece Global average
Availability of resources
Reso
urce
effi
cien
cy
low high
low
high
Sarasin Sustainability-Matrix®
Ecologicalcapital
Climate changegains / losses
Human, tangible,intangible capital
Educationefficiency
Healthefficiency
Economicstructure
Governance
Highlights (as of March 2010):low biocapacity, Ecol. Footpr. of product. considerably higherlow share of protected areas, high share of endangered speciesadverse demographics (over-ageing)high levels of public and foreign debtfair level of quality of life but high resource consumptionlow competitivenesshigh corruption, rather weak peace index
Financial assets /liabilities
Materialefficiency
Socialframework
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Greece Global average
24
Sarasin sustainability assessment –Country profile of Italy
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Italy Global average
Availability of resources
Reso
urce
effi
cien
cy
low high
low
high
Sarasin Sustainability-Matrix®
Ecologicalcapital
Climate changegains / losses
Human, tangible,intangible capital
Educationefficiency
Healthefficiency
Economicstructure
Governance
Highlights (as of March 2010):very low biocapacity, Ecological Footprint of production higherscarce water, negative climate change effects demographics among the most adverse (over-ageing)high level of public debt but moderate level of foreign debtrel. high quality of life but resource consumption also highelevated suicide rates, uneven income distributionweak governance (corruption and rule of law in particular)
Financial assets /liabilities
Materialefficiency
Socialframework
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Italy Global average