Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Presentation Title 1
Sustainability Tools used in WASH sector
Webinar March 18th, 2014
Presenters
•Andre Olschewski,
Technical Adviser, Skat
•Antonio Rodriguez, Team Leader for Central America, Water and Sanitation Program •Ryan Schweitzer, Technical Adviser, Aguaconsult Ltd
Mapping of Sustainability
Tools
Julia Boulenouar Claire Grayson
Harold Lockwood Ryan Schweitzer
Introduction:
March 4th Webinar: • 5 Programmatic Monitoring Tools • used by DPs (e.g AGUASAN and
UNICEF) • Intended to be comprehensive
measures of sustainability What else is out there? Right tool for the right job Demand/Needs Assessment Survey Broader Mapping of Tools
Survey Results
91 respondents (64% from NGOs) Organizations primarily involved with: • Monitoring and evaluation • Capacity support to service providers • Research • Project design
Survey Results
Source tools: • 63% of organizations use their own tools (internally developed) • Remainder
Survey Results: Demand
Current tools = “some” or “few” of their objectives What type of tool would you like?
Survey Results: Demand
At what stage do you want support?
Tools Mapping: Criterion
1. History of application in the WASH sector
2. Content (e.g. Framework: with “areas”, “indicators”, “sub-indicators”)
3. Clear and Reproducible Methodology (e.g. source of data, how data is collected, scoring, benchmarking)
4. Analysis and generation of output (e.g. Score, graph, report, recommendations)
Tools Mapping: Findings
Reviewed 183 documents in detail Twenty-four met 4 criteria as “tools” Most target projects
Tools Mapping: Findings
Developed for and applied in Africa
Framework: First Level
“Areas“ of Sustainability
Framework: Second Level
Second Level- Sustainability “Indicators “ 1. Sector
2. Sub-Sector: • Rural- 55% • Urban/Peri-Urban- 1% • “Generic”- 44%
Framework: Indicators
Methodology
1. Cost: wide range • $1k or less- (Organizational Self-assessments) • up to$100k (Post-Implementation Assessment)
2. Level of Effort
Implem-entation
Monitoring and
evaluation
Assessment
Design
9 tools
4 tools
11 tools
Methodology: Stage of Application
Tools Mapping: Outputs
Tools Mapping Summary
Current Future
Use Project evaluation Planning Links to monitoring
Sector Water Sanitation/Hygiene
Location Rural Urban/Peri-urban
Sustainability Areas
Technical Other areas (equity, inclusion)
Data collection techniques
Community/service level
Integrate
Geographic focus
Africa Other areas
André Olschewski
Skat Foundation, Switzerland
18th of March 2014
(4) (5) (6)
(7) (8) (9)
(10) (11) (12)
(13) (14) (15)
(16) (17) (18)
(1) (2) (3)
? ?
?
?
+ +
+
+
+
+
0
0 0
0
-
-
-
-
Units [Units installed
providing services]
Piloting
Phase
Few
Many
Time
Rope Pump Nicaragua
From technologies to lasting services
today 20 years ago March 2014
Successful
uptake
Units [Units installed
providing services]
Few
Many
Time
Rope Pump in African countries
Promising
Technology
Each case is specific
?
today 20 years ago March 2014
Decision support tool for assessing applicability and scalability of a specific WASH technology in one context
TAF provides comprehensive assessment following a stepwise and participatory process
Target users: government at local and national level, local private sector, local NGO, INGO, development partners, academia, others
Data sources: desk work, field visit, participants experiences
March 2014
WASH technology to be assessed for
applicability in given context
1 Screening
Step-1: Need and Demand
Step-2: Basic Applicability
3 Presentation of results of screening and assessments
4 Interpretation and Conclusion
Assessment of the potential of a WASH technology in a given context
2
March 2014
Su
sta
inab
ilit
y D
imen
sio
ns
Key actors perspectives
March 2014
Technology
Skills &
Know-how
Institutional
& Legal
Environ-
mental
Economic
Social
(4) (5) (6)
(7) (8) (9)
(10) (11) (12)
(13) (14) (15)
(16) (17) (18)
(1) (2) (3)
?
?
?
?
User/
Buyer
Producers/
Providers
Regulators/
Investors/
Facilitators
+ +
+
+
+
+
0
0 0
0
-
-
-
-
Su
sta
inab
ilit
y D
imen
sio
ns
Key actors perspectives
+
0
-
High value, neutral or positive, supportive characteristics
Potential impact, could become critical, needs follow up
Low value, negative, critical, hindering characteristics
? Unclear information, should be clarified?
+
0
-
March 2014
Technology
Skills &
Know-how
Institutional
& Legal
Environ-
mental
Economic
Social
(4) (5) (6)
(7) (8) (9)
(10) (11) (12)
(13) (14) (15)
(16) (17) (18)
(1) (2) (3)
?
?
?
?
User/
Buyer
Producers/
Providers
Regulators/
Investors/
Facilitators
+ +
+
+
+
+
0
0 0
0
-
-
-
-
Su
sta
inab
ilit
y D
imen
sio
ns
Key actors perspectives
+
0
-
High value, neutral or positive, supportive characteristics
Potential impact, could become critical, needs follow up
Low value, negative, critical, hindering characteristics
? Unclear information, should be clarified?
+
0
-
March 2014
Per sustainability dimension
Per perspective
Per topic
Technology Introduction Process (TIP)
December 2013
Technology Introduction Process defines roles and tasks for actors involved in each phase of introduction processTIP
Tipping
Point
Invention
Few
Many
Trialled
Technology
Time
Uptake & Use
Uptake(cumulative number of units installed providing services)
Succesful
technology
introduction
TestingPreparation
for launch
Actors
Inve
nti
on
Tip
pin
g
Po
int
Up
tak
e
& U
se
Specific
tasks per
actor and
phase
Technology Introduction Process
Actors Actors
Generic concept
For water, sanitation and hygiene technologies
Applicable for different cost models, e.g. market-based approachMarch 2014
WASHTech (2011-2013):
TAF tested in Burkina Faso, Ghana
and Uganda on 13 different WASH
technologies
Average cost per TAF application:
±3-5,000 US$
Host institutions in charge of WASH
level appointed to follow up the use
of TAF&TIP in all 3 countries
TAF&TIP integrated in national
procedures for technology validation
and introduction in all 3 countries
March 2014
TAF applied in Nicaragua without any external support
More TAF applications planned in different countries incl. Nicaragua
TAF&TIP can also be used
as planning & monitoring tool e.g. for reviews of projects
as conceptual framework for sustainability assessments of service models, e.g. Self Supply or programmes
March 2014
All documents available in public domain:
www.washtechnologies.net
Short video on Youtube on WASHTech by WaterAid
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5eUWuRYufk
Contacts:
March 2014
Process and Results El Salvador, Honduras, and Panama
Antonio Rodríguez Serrano
March 18th, 2014
Monitoring Countries Progress in
Water Supply and Sanitation
Monitoring Countries Progress in Water Supply and Sanitation
Central America
$
Services
Investment: How much has been spent and where it is coming from? Results: Progress and
remaining disparities
Service delivery pathways How finance is turned into services
2008 - 2012
2012 - 2015
Investment: How much needs to be spent?
Service delivery pathways How finance should be spent?
Results: Expected results vs. targets
Understanding past trends: Sector Finance vs. Results (Coverage)
Benchmarking service delivery pathways for each sub-sector: UW, US, RW, RS
Estimating the investment gap to meet the targets.
Monitoring Countries Progress in Water Supply and Sanitation
What underpins progress in WSS coverage?
Analysis
Scorecard
Financing Tool
GLAAS
Dialogue
Participation
Focal Meetings
Reform Actions (Roadmaps)
Country Reports
Regional Benchmarking
Decision Makers
Sector Institutions
Decision
Country-led and Ownership
Monitoring Countries Progress in Water Supply and Sanitation
Policy?
Planning?
Budget?
Expenditure?
Equity?
Output?
Markets?
Uptake?
User?
Enabling services Developing
services
Sustaining
services
Fin
an
ce
Se
rvic
es
Monitoring Countries Progress in Water Supply and Sanitation
Scorecard – identifies bottlenecks and drivers
1. Population Projections 2. Coverage Status
2. Targets
3. 4. 5. Technology
Distribution and
Unit Costs
6. Estimated Rehabilitation
Requirements
Total Investment Requirements
Public Investment
Requirements
FINANCE GAP
7. User Contributions
8. 9. 10. Available Finance from
Government, Donors and Off-
budget (NGOs)
Monitoring Countries Progress in Water Supply and Sanitation
Financing Tool – Estimates investment GAP
Monitoring Countries Progress in Water Supply and Sanitation
WSS Coverage: past, present and future
Monitoring Countries Progress in Water Supply and Sanitation
WSS Technology Distribution and Unit Costs
Potential link with WASH COST
Promoting Coordination and Dialogue
Supporting Poor-Inclusive Water Supply and Sanitation Sector Reform
Global Agenda: • SWA
• GLAAS
MAPAS as a regional monitoring in
FOCARD-APS countries
Making an Impact on Inequalities
Actions
• National RWSS Plan
• US$ 30 M RWSS Project
Indigenous communities
Presidential goals
90% water coverage in rural areas by 2014
Monitoring Countries Progress in Water Supply and Sanitation
Focusing on How To Sustain Service Delivery
Monitoring Countries Progress in Water Supply and Sanitation
GAP
$ 155.9 Million/ year
Stock Replacement
$ 122.6 Million/ year
Sustain
Sector
Results
Monitoring Countries Progress in Water Supply and Sanitation
Scorecard – roadmap to reform actions
Discussion Questions
In the long term what is the role of these tools in contributing to the sustainability of WASH services?
Can tools be integrated into other monitoring processes (local, national, international)?
What can be done to maximize the impact of the outputs of these tools?
Moving Forward
• Webinar powerpoint files available:
http://www.globalwaterchallenge.org/washtoolssecondwebinarmaster.pdf
• Broader Mapping publication
• One-page summaries of each tool
• E-Discussion????
Thank you!
Andre Olschewski
Antonio Rodriguez
Ryan Schweitzer
_____________
![Methodology material. References and Data Collection for local products Screening 1 Recommendations Screening 2 Recommendations and archetype [Step 1]](https://img.pdfslide.net/doc/110x75/56649e915503460f94b96138/methodology-material-references-and-data-collection-for-local-products-screening.jpg)
