15
Swets et al (1961)

Swets et al (1961)

  • Upload
    quasim

  • View
    54

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Swets et al (1961). Key ideas. continuity in stimulus-induced mental states variability in these states sensitivity (d’) role of prior probability and payoffs bias, criterion… Bayesian inference n ormative/optimal model, ideal observer. Your questions. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Swets  et al (1961)

Swets et al (1961)

Page 2: Swets  et al (1961)

Key ideas

• continuity in stimulus-induced mental states• variability in these states• sensitivity (d’)• role of prior probability and payoffs• bias, criterion…• Bayesian inference• normative/optimal model, ideal observer

Page 3: Swets  et al (1961)

Your questions• How to get expected ROC given hypothetical underlying

distributions?• What is the meaning of the ‘spread’ or ‘variance’, and how

does this relate to performance?• What is ‘beta’ exactly and how does it relate to area under

curve?• How are ROC curves generated from a rating experiment?• How is the prior and/or placement of the criterion

determined by the subject? Is learning involved? If so in what way?

Page 4: Swets  et al (1961)

More questions

• When do we stay with a theory even if it isn’t a perfect fit and when do we reject it and seek another theory?

• How was it that the authors were able to reject the threshold theory even when their own data were and only so-so fit to their own theory?

• How do we generalize given the large individual differences in studies such as these?

• How do we distinguish between signals lost in noise and signals that decay before they can be reported?

Page 5: Swets  et al (1961)

Plan

• Go over the basic elements of the theory• Generate a hypothetical ROC curve• Consider effect of prior and payoff• Consider effect of unequal variance• Consider the data reported in the experiments

Page 6: Swets  et al (1961)

Key Concepts• Prior p(SN), p(N)• Likelihood fSN(x) = p(x|SN),

fN(x) = p(x|N)• likelihood ratio =

fSN(x)/fN(x)• Posterior p(SN|x), p(N|x)• Criterion, Beta• [Maximizing strategy

inherent in model vs. probability matching]

Page 7: Swets  et al (1961)
Page 8: Swets  et al (1961)
Page 9: Swets  et al (1961)
Page 10: Swets  et al (1961)
Page 11: Swets  et al (1961)
Page 12: Swets  et al (1961)
Page 13: Swets  et al (1961)
Page 14: Swets  et al (1961)

Subliminal Perception?

• “It may be, therefore, that subliminal perception exists only when a high criterion is incorrectly identified as a limen.”

Page 15: Swets  et al (1961)

More questions

• When do we stay with a theory even if it isn’t a perfect fit and when do we reject it and seek another theory?

• How was it that the authors were able to reject the threshold theory even when their own data were and only so-so fit to their own theory?

• How do we generalize given the large individual differences in studies such as these?

• How do we distinguish between signals lost in noise and signals that decay before they can be reported?