View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
synchrony and networks how the growth and decline of cities and the rise and fall
of city-size hierarchies is related to the network structure of intercity connections
Doug White UC Irvine
Social Science History Association November 12-15 2009
Parts of the story in a nutshell
Pax Mongolica: The routes of the silk road leading west from Central Asia (detail of map at Tashkent University).
http://www.silk-road.com/artl/paxmongolica.shtml
Temporally: Opening and closure of the silk roads affect globalized Eurasian synchrony from China to Europe
Economic structure: The bicomponent multiple independent routes between cities as the trading nodes promote competitive pricing.
City rise and city-fall: Population scaling distributions change with temporal changes in economic links.
Cycles vs. cutpoints are key to the dynamics as polities compete for dominance of trading routes and cities.
Parts of the story in a nutshell
Pax Mongolica: The routes are subject to policies of polities and empires, falling into epochs of domination (Modelski et al. p.78,217)___Regional
N. Sung 930-
S. Sung 1060-
Genoa 1190-_________to Global____
Mongols 1250-90-1360 trans Eurasian
Portugal 1430- Global system mapping
Holland 1540- Global capital
England 1640- Global industrial exports
Britain 1740- Global organization
United States 1850-Global information- Global market
United States 1950- Decolonization
-1990 Depolarization - Global hyperspace
Euro-Hegemon examples
(Arrighi 1994)
Commercial
Financial
Constantinople
Venice
Genoa
Amsterdam
London
New York
Transaction costs, hegemony and inflation as q-correlated temporal variables
Conflict on Land Sea trade routes safer than land, 1318-1453/4+ (Spufford:407)
Inflation Lo/hi
Landed Armies safe land routes 1500-1650 Maritime Conflicts (Jan Glete)
Landed Trade Secure
Dominant Routes
Sea routes safe French Sov.
Peace of Westphalia
Baltic conflicts: connection to Novgorod and Russia (lost)
Swedish hegemony
European access
Struggle for Empire: Sea Battles to 1815
Global Maritime
Economy Industrial Rev. from 1760
Political Revolutions to 1814
Trade net
(low cost)
versus
(high cost)
Maritime (low cost)
versus
Land routes trade
(pop. growth)
Financial capital
CommercialC C C C C C C C C C I ? ? ? ? I I I I I I I I I I I ? ? I I I I I I q H i ? ? ? ? L ? ? ? h h h h L L L L L L L L h h h h h h L L L L h h L L L L L h h h L P P ? ? p P ? ? ? E E E E E E E ? ? E E E E E E E ? E E E q L o F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 0 2 5 7 0 2 5 7 0 2 5 7 0 2 5 7 0 2 5 7 0 2 5 7 0 2 5 7 0 2 5 7 0 2 5 7 0 2 5 7 0 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 L/h lo/hi inflation figures (L=depression) are for that year forward
• Conclusions: city systems in the last millennium
• City systems unstable; have historical periods of rise and fall over hundreds of years; exhibit collapse.
• City system growth periods in one region, which are periods of innovation, have time-lagged effects on less developed regions if there are active trade routes between them.
• NETWORKS AFFECT DEVELOPMENT.• • SO WHY DOES THE MEDIEVAL EUROPEAN RENAISSANCE ECONOMY
COLLAPSE CIRCA 1300?• Trade dominance shifts from betweenness centrality (Genoa) to global Flow
Centrality (Bruges)• China invaded, change in Silk routes• Credit crisis between North and Southern Europe• Major problem in Population Growth/Resource base• Internecine struggles• Major collapse, long recovery "Long 13th century” reaches to today
city systems in the last millennium
Are there inter-region synchronies? Cross-correlations give
lag 0 = perfect synchrony
lag 1 = state of region A predicts that of B 50 years later
lag 2 = state of region A predicts that of B 100 years later
lag 3 = state of region A predicts that of B 150 years later
etc.
Cities in the region of “MiddleEast&Afghan&India” are initially inversely related to but then affect Chinese Cities with 100-150 year lags
Whole period 900 - 1950
city systems in the last millennium
76543210-1-2-3-4-5-6-7
Lag Number
0.9
0.6
0.3
0.0
-0.3
-0.6
-0.9
CC
F
mle_MidAsia with mle_China
Lower Confidence Limit
Upper Confidence Limit
Coefficient
Moving to closer inter-Asian regions excluding India but on the Silk RoadTime-lagged cross-correlation effects of Mid-Asian q on China
(1=50 year lagged effect)
MiddleEast&Afghan Robust Cities affect Robust Chinese Cities with 50 year lag
city systems in the last millennium
76543210-1-2-3-4-5-6-7
Lag Number
0.9
0.6
0.3
0.0
-0.3
-0.6
-0.9
CC
F
mle_China with mle_Europe
Lower Confidence Limit
Upper Confidence Limit
Coefficient
Moving between endpoints further away on the Silk RoadsTime-lagged cross-correlation effects of China q on Europe
76543210-1-2-3-4-5-6-7
Lag Number
0.9
0.6
0.3
0.0
-0.3
-0.6
-0.9C
CF
China with Europe4
Lower Confidence Limit
Upper Confidence Limit
Coefficient
(100 year lagged effect)
(non-MLE result for q)
Robust Chinese Cities affect Robust European Cities with 100 and 300 year lag
city systems in the last millennium
76543210-1-2-3-4-5-6-7
Lag Number
0.9
0.6
0.3
0.0
-0.3
-0.6
-0.9
CC
F
logSilkRoad with EurBeta10
Lower Confidence Limit
Upper Confidence Limit
Coefficient
Time-lagged cross-correlation effects of the Silk Road trade on Europe
(50 year lagged effect)
76543210-1-2-3-4-5-6-7
Lag Number
0.9
0.6
0.3
0.0
-0.3
-0.6
-0.9
CC
F
mle_MidAsia with mle_Europe
Lower Confidence Limit
Upper Confidence Limit
Coefficient
Chinese Silk road trade affects Elite tails of European Cities with 50 year lag
Robust Mideast Cities small effect on Robust European Cities with 150 year lag
76543210-1-2-3-4-5-6-7
Lag Number
0.9
0.6
0.3
0.0
-0.3
-0.6
-0.9
CC
Fmle_Europe with ParisPercent
Lower Confidence Limit
Upper Confidence Limit
Coefficient
Elite tails of European Cities maintain Paris as Euro Elite Capital with 100 year decay
Probability distribution q shapes for a person being in a city with at least population x (fitted by MLE estimation) Pareto Type II
city systems in the last millennium Shalizi (2007) right graphs=variant fits
q measures the shape of the body of the curve, while beta10 measure fits the log-log slope of the tails, which vary independently of q.
Goodness of fit for q and beta10 are found by bootstrap probability simulation, where with added iterations around each of four periods
Variations in q and the power-law slope β for 900-1970 in 50 year intervals
city systems in the last millennium
1970
1950
1925
1900
1875
1850
1825
1800
1750
1700
1650
1600
1575
1550
1500
1450
1400
1350
1300
1250
1200
1150
1100
1000
900
1970
1950
1925
1900
1875
1850
1825
1800
1750
1700
1650
1600
1575
1550
1500
1450
1400
1350
1300
1250
1200
1150
1100
1000
900
1970
1950
1925
1900
1875
1850
1825
1800
1750
1700
1650
1600
1575
1550
1500
1450
1400
1350
1300
1250
1200
1150
1100
1000
900
date
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
MinQ_BetaBeta10MLEqExtrap
China Europe Mid-Asia
1970
1950
1925
1900
1875
1850
1825
1800
1750
1700
1650
1600
1575
1550
1500
1450
1400
1350
1300
1250
1200
1150
1100
1000
900
1970
1950
1925
1900
1875
1850
1825
1800
1750
1700
1650
1600
1575
1550
1500
1450
1400
1350
1300
1250
1200
1150
1100
1000
900
1970
1950
1925
1900
1875
1850
1825
1800
1750
1700
1650
1600
1575
1550
1500
1450
1400
1350
1300
1250
1200
1150
1100
1000
900
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
MinQ_BetaBeta10MLEqExtrap
Are these random walks or historical Periods? Runs Test Results
city systems in the last millennium
Runs Tests at medians across all three regions
MLE-q Beta10 Min(q/1.5,
Beta/2) Test Value(a) 1.51 1.79 .88 Cases < Test Value 35 36 35 Cases >= Test Value 36 37 38 Total Cases 71 73 73 Number of Runs 20 22 22 Z -3.944 -3.653 -3.645 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .0001 .0003 .0003
Runs Test for temporal variations of q in the three regions mle_Europe mle_MidAsia mle_China Test Value(a) 1.43 1.45 1.59 Cases < Test Value 9 11 10 Cases >= Test Value 9 11 12 Total Cases 18 22 22 Number of Runs 4 7 7 Z -2.673 -1.966 -1.943 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .008 .049 .052
a Median
(figures courtesy of Andrew Sherratt, ArchAtlas)
Cohesive extension of trade routes leads to a host of other developments…
Multiconnected regions => structural cohesion variables
Multiconnected regions => structural cohesion variables
Multiconnected regions => structural cohesion variables
Some changes in the medieval network from 1000 CE
Multiconnected regions => structural cohesion variables
to 1500 CE
(note changes in biconnected zones of structural cohesion)
Project mapping is proceeding for cities and trade networks for all of AfroEurasia and urban industries for Europe in 25-year intervals, 1150-1500
(our technology for cities / zones / trade networks / distributions of multiple industries across cities for each time period includes dynamic GIS overlays, flyover and zoomable web images)
Multiconnected regions => structural cohesion variables
0900 AD
low q with thin power law tails of global hubs CORRELATES with global network links
From first stirrings of globalization to the 21st Century
Europe
Central Asia
Medit. China
Near East
India
In these slides I will connect the city network & city size distributions and power-law tails connected to q-exponential scaling of city sizesQ
(sc
alin
g si
zes)
ChanganChanganChangan
Bagdad & Changan (Xi’an)
Silk routes
1000 AD
960: Song capital at Kaifeng, invention of national markets, credit mechanisms diffuse
Global network links characterize low q (power law tail for city sizes)
Silk routes
N~3
1100 AD
Global network links characterize low q (more exponential body with power law tail for city sizes)
Silk Routes
1150 AD
Global network links characterize low q (more exponential body with power law tail for city sizes)
1127: No. Song capital of Kaifeng conquered, Song move to south, capital at Hangchow
Silk Routes diminish
1200 AD
Song capital at Hangchow
Golden Horde silk routes
Global network links characterize low q
Silk Routes diminish
1250 AD
Broken network links lead change to high q – led by China, 50 years
cutnodes edgecut
1300 AD
Broken network links characterize high q (here: tenuous interregional connectors)
1279: Mongols conquer Song
Kublai Khan Mongol trade
1350 AD
Broken network links characterize high q (here: tenuous interregional connectors)
Mongols refocus on Yuan administration of China
Silk routes unimportant
1400 AD
Renewed network links characterize low q (power law tail)
1368 Ming retake China
Silk routes unimportant
1450 AD
Renewed network links characterize low q (power law) – high q led by China, 100 years
1421 Ming move capital to Peking
Silk routes unimportant
World population growth turns super-exponential
1500 AD
Renewed network links characterize low q (power law tail) – but China high q leads change
1550 AD
Broken network links characterize high q
1600 AD
Renewed network links will lead change to low q (here: tenuous interregional connectors)
1650 AD
Renewed network links characterize low q (power law tail) – China synchronized
1700 AD
Broken network links return to high q – esp. for China leading
1750 AD
Broken network links typify high q – China leading – bifurcated world
1800 AD
Broken network links typify high q – bifurcated world
Circum-European cities start to overtake China in number
1825 AD
Broken network links typify high q – trifurcated world – best example of high local navigability
European cities overtake China in number and size
Industrial revolution
British opium trade from India
1850 AD
Broken network links typify high q – trifurcated world – but China developing power-law tail
(here: tenuous interregional connectors)
1875 AD
Broken network links typify high q – bifurcated - China power-law tail thinning toward low-q
(here: tenuous interregional connectors)
1900 AD
Broken network links typify high q – trifurcated Eurodominant - China leads shift to low-q 50 yrs
1925 AD
Broken network links typify high q – trifurcated - rise of Japan - China returns to high q
Start of a low q Zipfian tail for world city distribution – trifurcated – but linked by airlines
1950 AD
N-cohesion (2=competitive 1=monopoly land trade) leads Q (city rise/fall) :
fragments
Is there Eurasia synchrony?
Yes: but it is not simultaneous.
Rather, it is time-lagged synchrony
and not always in the direction.
It goes from leading to trailing economies following the dynamics of trade.
And the dynamics of trade is influenced by whether the trading network is monopolized by chokepoints or is competitive.
Competition is defined by biconnectivity.
(A special case of structural cohesion)