Upload
manali-patil
View
223
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
This article contains information of ultrasound assisted synthesis of Titanium oxide
Citation preview
Synthesis of Titanium dioxide by ultrasound assisted sol-gel technique:
Effect of Calcination and Sonication Time.
D. V. Pinjari a, Krishnamurthy Prasad b, B. Pawar b, A. B. Pandit a and S. T.
Mhaske b*
a Chemical Engineering Division, Institute of Chemical Technology, Matunga,
Mumbai - 400 019. INDIA.
b Department of Polymer and Surface Engineering,
Institute of Chemical Technology, Matunga, Mumbai - 400 019. INDIA.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed
Email: [email protected] Tel: +91-22-33611111; Fax: +91-22-4145614
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Abstract:
Nanostructured Titanium dioxide was synthesized using both conventional and
ultrasound assisted sol-gel technique. All the specimens were subjected to a calcinations
temperature of 750°C. Calcination time was varied from 30 min to 3 hours to study the
effect of calcination time on the properties of the synthesized TiO2. The TiO2 specimens
were characterized using X- Ray Diffraction (XRD) and Scanning Electron Microscopy
(SEM). The sonication time was also varied. The influence of the calcination and
sonication time on the phase transformation process from anatase to rutile and its
consequent effect on the crystallite size and % crystallinity of the synthesized TiO2 was
studied and interpreted. It was found that 100% phase transformation was observed after
3 hours of calcinations for the ultrasound assisted sol-gel synthesized TiO2. The study on
the phase transformation via variation of sonication time yielded some interesting results.
It was seen as the time period of sonic impulse was increased an initial increase followed
by a decrease in rutile content was observed. In general the ultrasound assisted process
helped create TiO2 material with a higher % rutile than the conventional sol-gel process.
Keywords: Sol-Gel, Acoustic Cavitation (Ultrasound), Titanium dioxide (TiO2),
Calcination Time, Sonication Time.
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
1. Introduction
The physical methods of nanoparticle synthesis have a few
inherent disadvantages which limits their usage. They cannot prepare
nanoparticles having controlled size distribution and also the sizes that
may be synthesized are often at the 100 nm and above level which is
not good enough for the newer demands of the nanoparticle industry.
On the other hand precipitating clusters of inorganic compounds from a solution
of chemical compounds has been an attractive proposition for researchers, primarily
because of the simplicity with which experiments can be conducted in a laboratory. This
is especially true if the goal is to just have a nanocrystalline powder, instead of a
“dispersible” nanoparticulate powder [1]. Solution processing can be classified into three
major categories. In addition there are various sub-categories like hydrothermal synthesis
and polyol techniques but the three most widely used techniques are:
1. Sol-Gel Processing.
2. Precipitation Method.
3. Water-Oil Micro-emulsions (Reverse Micelle) method.
The sol-gel process is a versatile solution process for making ceramic and glass
materials. The sol-gel process, as the name implies, involves the evolution of inorganic
networks through the formation of a colloidal suspension (sol) and gelation of the sol to
form a network in a continuous liquid phase (gel). A sol is a dispersion of the solid
particles, with diameter of 1-1000 nm [2], in a liquid where only the Brownian motions
suspend the particles.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
A gel is a state where both liquid and solid are dispersed in each other, which
presents a solid network containing liquid components. The precursors for synthesizing
these colloids consist of a metal or metalloid element surrounded by various reactive
ligands. Metal alkoxides are most popular because they react readily with water. The
most widely used metal alkoxides are the alkoxysilanes, such as tetramethoxysilane
(TMOS) and tetraethoxysilane (TEOS). However, other alkoxides such as aluminates,
titanates, and borates are also commonly used in the sol-gel process, often mixed with
TEOS.
Applying the sol-gel process, it is possible to fabricate ceramic or glass materials
in a wide variety of forms: ultra-fine or spherical shaped powders, thin film coatings,
ceramic fibers, microporous to nanoporous inorganic membranes, monolithic ceramics
and glasses, or extremely porous aerogel materials.
The sol-gel process is widely used for manufacturing nanoparticles of various
metal oxide materials like TiO2 [3-5], ZnO [6, 7], SiO2 [8, 9], WO3 [10], etc. The sol–gel
route is very attractive because it is relatively easy to perform and allows us to tailor the
morphology of particles by relative rate of hydrolysis and condensation reactions [1]. The
sol-gel synthesis of metal oxides involves the following steps:
1. Sol formation: In this step, the metal alkoxide is dispersed in an acidic solution to
form a clear sol.
2. Gel formation: In this step, the sol is reacted with water forming a gel which is
nothing but the metal hydroxide complex formed by reaction of the precursor with
water.
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
3. Dehydration: Generally a large excess of water is taken in the Gelation step to
ensure maximum conversion of the sol to gel. The excess water is removed in the
dehydration stage which may involve the use of high temperature operations like
azeotropic distillation.
4. Calcination: The fourth and final step of the sol-gel process is the Calcination
step. This is nothing but a high temperature assisted bond breakage and
reconfiguration process. Calcination is generally done at temperatures exceeding
300°C and can also be carried out temperatures as high as 1200°C. Calcination
deals with breaking of M-OH (where M represents metallic element like Si, Ti,
Al, etc.) bonds to form a metal oxide material MOx where x is the oxidation
number and generally x has the lowest permissible value.
Three main reactions occur during the sol-gel process: hydrolysis, alcohol
condensation, and water condensation. However, the characteristics and properties of a
particular sol-gel inorganic network are related to a number of factors that affect the rate
of hydrolysis and condensation reactions, such as, pH, temperature and time of reaction,
reagent concentrations, catalyst nature and concentration, H2O/Si molar ratio (R), aging
temperature and time, and drying. Of the factors listed above, pH, nature and
concentration of catalyst, H2O/Si molar ratio (R), and temperature have been identified as
most important [11].
The sol-gel technique requires annealing treatment of the amorphous precipitates,
to induce crystallization. The annealing process consists of two stages viz; Dehydration
and Calcination. Dehydration is carried out in an air-circulating oven at a suitable
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
temperature while the calcination is done in a muffle furnace. The calcinations procedure
is used for conversion of the Titanyl hydroxide complex into Titanium dioxide. The
temperature to which the material is subjected to and the time frame of exposure to the
high temperatures used in the calcinations process is a huge influence on the crystalline
properties of the synthesized nanomaterial. The Calcination step perhaps has the most
influence on the properties of the synthesized material. The two factors that can control
the Calcination process are:
1. Calcination Temperature.
2. Calcination Time.
Selection of proper Calcination temperature is of extreme importance in the sol-
gel process. Metal oxide materials occur in various crystalline polymorphs and generally
these polymorphs are interconvertible polymorphs. Reversible and irreversible phase
transformations are a common feature in metal oxide chemistry. Some crystalline phases
have better packing and higher crystallinity in comparision to others but occur at only
higher temperature. A typical example being Titanium dioxide (TiO2) of which the more
crystalline rutile phase may be created at temperatures of 600°C and above. Titanium
dioxide occurs in mainly two crystalline polymorphs viz; anatase and rutile. The major
distinction between the two phases is in their differing behaviour under ultraviolet
irradiation. Anatase is photocatalytic in nature i.e. it produce free-radicals on account of
excitation by the UV radiation whereas rutile is a UV absorber [12]. Thus, for obtaining
phase purity ad selectivity in synthesis, selection of optimum calcination temperature is
essential.
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
The effect of calcination temperature on the properties of TiO2 synthesized by
ultrasound assisted (US) and conventional sol-gel (NUS) synthesis was put forward in
our previous work [13]. As Calcination temperature was increased in both the US and
NUS synthesized TiO2 there was an increase in the % rutile content. The effect of
increased surface area and consequent increased rate of heat transfer to the bulk made it
possible to obtain 100% phase transformation in the US synthesized TiO2 at 750°C a full
100°C lesser than the temperature required for 100% phase transformation in the NUS
synthesized TiO2.
The effect of Calcination time on a particular material seems to be of particular
importance as the time period to which a material is subjected to high temperatures will
play a role in deciding what kind of crystalline microstructure will be developed in the
material. A fleeting Calcination procedure will not afford enough time for the lattice
structure to get developed completely thus creating a material with an inferior crystalline
structure. A sufficiently slow Calcination process will perhaps allow the lattices to get
oriented properly thus creating a more ordered microstructure thereby creating a more
crystalline material.
Acoustic cavitation technique is extremely useful for synthesizing nanomaterials.
Basically the extreme transient conditions generated in the vicinity and within the
collapsing cavitational bubbles have been used for the size reduction of the material to
the nano scale. In acoustic cavitation, it generates a transient localized hot zone with
extremely high temperature gradient and pressure. The sonochemical precursors used are
destructed due to sudden changes in temperature and pressure and are finally resulting in
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
the formation of nanoparticles. The acoustic cavitation technique has a potential to
produce nanoparticles in large volume.
In this paper, the effect of calcination and sonication time on the properties of sol-
gel (US and NUS) synthesized TiO2 was studied and the trends in the properties of the
synthesized TiO2 were interpreted.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1 Materials
Titanium Tetraisopropoxide (TTIP) precursor was obtained from Spectrochem Pvt. Ltd.,
India. 2 –propanol (99.9% pure) was purchased from s. d. Fine Chemicals Ltd, Mumbai,
India. Glacial acetic acid solution was ordered from Merck Ltd, Mumbai, India.
2.2 Preparation of TiO2 by conventional (Non-Ultrasound assisted (NUS) Sol-Gel
Method.
5 mL of Titanium Tetraisopropoxide (TTIP) precursor was added dropwise to 30
mL of 2-propanol. The resulting clear solution was added dropwise under stirring to 5
mL of glacial acetic acid solution. The sol thus obtained was left at ambient temperature
for 24 hours. For getting nearly 100% conversion (i.e. for ensuring complete hydrolysis
of TTIP precursor), the solution needed to be kept as such for approximately 1 day.
The sol obtained after 24 hours was then converted into a gel by adding it to 30
mL of distilled water under stirring. The obtained gel was then dehydrated in an air
circulating oven at 110 oC for 3 hours. The dehydrated material was then calcined in a
muffle furnace (Expo Hi Tech Mumbai, India, Power input = 2 KW and Length x
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
Breadth x Height = 30 cm x 10 cm x 10 cm) at 750oC for varying time periods from 30
min to 3 hours. The white powder obtained after calcinations was cooled, ground and
weighed to check for yield of the process.
2.3 Preparation of TiO2 by Ultrasound assisted (US) Sol-Gel Method
The mixture of TTIP precursor, 2-propanol and glacial acetic acid solution was
subjected to sonication using an Ultrasonic Horn (ACE 22 KHz) at 40% amplitude
actually delivering 29.2 watts of power for 10 minutes with a 5 second pulse and 5
second relaxation cycle. Thus, the sol obtained after keeping it for 24 hours was again
ultrasonically irradiated by keeping same parameters (output power and pulse &
relaxation cycle). The remaining procedure including the volume of the reactants was
kept the same (as reported in section 2.2). The purpose behind the dual sonication has
been reported earlier [13] After calcination the TiO2 powder (white in color) obtained
was cooled, ground, checked for yield and characterized using the same techniques as
that used for the NUS sol-gel synthesized specimens.
The calcinations times that the specimens were subjected to were 0.5, 1, 2 and 3
hours respectively. Accordingly, the NUS sol-gel synthesized TiO2 specimens were
labeled as TNUS 0.5, TNUS 1, TNUS 2, TNUS 2 and TNUS 3 while the US sol-gel
synthesized TiO2 specimens were labeled as TUS 0.5, TUS 1, TUS 2 and TUS 3.
Keeping in mind, heating rate for NUS and US sol gel specimens were kept same.
After the time period of calcination was optimized for both the NUS and US
specimens, a new set of US specimens were synthesized by varying the sonication time at
time t =0 h and t = 24 h. Initially, the US specimens were synthesized by using a
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
sonication time of 10 minutes and t = 0 h and t = 24 h. two new sets of specimens were
synthesized using sonication time of 5 minutes and 15 minutes at t = 0 h and t = 24 h and
were labeled as TUS(5) and TUS(15) respectively.
3. Characterization
The TiO2 specimens were first characterized by studying their X-Ray Diffraction
patterns on a Rigaku Mini-Flex X-Ray Diffractometer. Crystallite sizes were determined
using the Debye-Scherrer equation. Scanning Electron Microscopy of the specimens was
carried out on a JEOL JSM 680LA 15 kV SEM to estimate the surface characteristics of
the specimen. Together the XRD and SEM methods provide exact knowledge regarding
the crystallite size and crystalline characteristics of the synthesized TiO2.
4. Results and Discussions
Initially, the subject of the study was to optimize the Calcination time required for
attaining 100% phase transformation from anatase to rutile in the synthesized titanium
dioxide.
Table 1 shows the average yields obtained for the synthesis and it is observed
that the US synthesis has got a much higher % yield than the corresponding NUS process
and this is attributed to the ability of acoustic cavitation to improve the reaction kinetics
by improved mass transfer (on account of the micro-mixing caused by the acoustic shock
wave release on collapse of the cavitation bubble) and increase in reaction rates due to
radical formation due to the adverse conditions created by bubble collapse.
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
4.1 X-ray Diffractometer (XRD) Study for Calcination Time optimization
The XRD patterns of the TiO2 specimens prepared by non ultrasound (NUS) sol-
gel method are shown in Figure 1. The anatase form of TiO2 shows a peak at 2θ = 25o
while the presence of rutile form is indicated by a peak at 2θ = 28o. % Rutile was
calculated by the following non-linear equation [14, 15]:
% R = 100/[(A/R)*0.884 + 1] …………………………(1)
Where % R = Rutile content in percent, A = Peak Intensity of the peak at 2θ =
25°, R = Peak Intensity of the peak at 2θ = 28°
The crystallite sizes of the specimens were calculated by using the Debye-
Scherrer equation. The equation takes the form:
Dhkl = K/ (Bhkl x cos hkl)………………………….. (2)
Where B is the width of the peak at half maximum intensity of a specific phase
(hkl) in radians, K is a constant that varies with the method of taking the breadth (0.89 <
K < 1). Here, in this work, for calculation purpose K = 0.9, is the wavelength of
incident X-rays, = 1.54 Å for Cu Ka, is the center angle of the peak, D is the crystallite
length or primary crystallite size.
4.1.1 Phase transformation in TiO2 synthesized by Conventional (NUS) sol gel method
The X-Ray diffraction patterns of the specimens synthesized by the convention
i.e. Non-Ultrasound assisted sol-gel technique is shown in Figure 1. From the XRD
patterns it is clear that with an increase in calcination time there is an increase in the
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
rutile content. This is proved by a continuous increase in the intensity of the peak at 2θ
= 28°.
The specimen calcined for 30 min i.e 0.5 hours (TNUS 0.5) shows the least rutile
content while the specimen calcined for 3 hours (TNUS 3) shows the maximum rutile
content amongst the NUS synthesized specimens (Figure 3). This is attributed to the fact
that when sufficiently large amount of time was provided for the calcination process the
heat supplied could permeate into the recesses of the specimen and an exposure to the
high temperature (750°C) brought about the phase transformation in the TiO2 specimens
from the meta-stable anatase phase to the more stable rutile phase.
The % crystallinity of the specimens was determined by the method described
previously [13] as expected, with an increase in rutile content, there is an increase in %
crystallinity (Figure 4). The rutile polymorph of TiO2 shows better packing density,
specific gravity and lower unit cell volume which results in it having higher %
crystallinity than anatase which on its part has lower packing density, specific gravity and
higher unit cell volume.
The trends in crystallite size and predominant crystalline phase are reported in
Table 2. Supporting the trend in % crystallinity, there is an increase in average crystallite
size as the calcination time is increased thereby serving as an indicator for increasing %
rutile content. Thus, TNUS 0.5 which has been calcined for the least amount of time
shows a lower crystallite size (24nm) than TNUS 3 which has been calcined for a longer
duration (35nm).
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
4.1.2 Phase transformation in TiO2 synthesized by Ultrasound assisted (US) sol gel
method
The X-Ray diffraction patterns of the specimens synthesized by the ultrasound
assisted ie US sol-gel technique is shown in Figure 2. The major facet of the effect of
calcination time on the % rutile of the US synthesized specimens was the 100%
conversion from anatase to rutile observed in the specimen TUS 3.
Acoustic cavitation causes an increase in the effective surface area, thereby
increasing the rate of heat transfer to the bulk of the specimen. This rate is faster than that
for the NUS synthesized specimens, thus, 100% phase transformation occurs at a much
lower temperature for the US synthesized specimens than for the NUS synthesized
specimens.
As calcination time is increased from 0.5 h to 3 h as seen in the NUS specimens
there is an increase in the % rutile but what stands out is the fact that the increase in the
% rutile amongst the US specimens is much more pronounced than that observed
amongst the NUS specimens (Figure 3). This is attributed to the effect on the system of
the dual sonication process:
The pre-hydrolysis sonication was done to ensure an efficient micromixing of the
various reactants in the reaction system. This was done, therefore, to ensure that the
reactants were contacted properly in the highly adverse conditions exerted onto the
system during the 10 min of pre-hydrolysis sonication.
The post-hydrolysis sonication was intended to encourage formation of
nanoparticles (as nuclei) with smaller average particle sizes. This also ensured that during
calcination the heat was transferred more efficiently into the bulk of the material thereby
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
ensuring that all of the particles in the bulk were subjected to the highest possible
temperature in the lowest possible time.
The combined effects of the dual sonication help in acceleration of phase
transformation from anatase to rutile, thereby, the US synthesized specimens show faster
progression in phase transformation from TUS 0.5 to TUS 3.
The crystallite size study in the case of the US synthesized specimens yielded
results similar to the NUS specimens in-so-far as the trends in values were concerned.
Thus, the two synthesis techniques were in-principle having a similar effect on the
synthesized material. The only difference was that the effect of phase transformation
observed in the US synthesized specimens was much more pronounced than that in the
case of the NUS synthesized specimens.
4.2 Scanning Electron Microscopy study
The SEM micrographs of the specimens are shown in Figure 5. As seen in our
previous work, the TiO2 synthesized using the US method and calcinated at 750°C was
shown to be having a block-type structure [16]. This is now observed in the micrograph
of specimen TUS 3 (Figure 5A). No such block-type structure is observed in the
corresponding NUS specimen TNUS 3 (Figure 5B). The reason for this can be explained
as follows, the specimen synthesized by the US method and calcinated for 3 hours at
750°C ie TUS 3 was shown to be a 100% rutile polymorph form of TiO2 and thus is more
crystalline than the anatase+rutile nature possessing TNUS 3. Therefore, the surface
micrograph of TUS 3 showed a more close packed and ordered appearance than that of
TNUS 3.
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
From the study it was found that for the US synthesized specimens a calcination
time of 3 h was enough to produce 100% phase transformation from anatase to rutile in
the synthesized titanium dioxide. Therefore, using that calcination time, two new titanium
dioxide specimens were synthesized using the ultrasound assisted sol-gel method but
using a sonication time of 5 minutes and 15 minutes respectively. These specimens were
studied using the XRD and SEM methods also and their properties (morphology and
phase presence) were compared with the TNUS 3 and TUS 3 specimens.
4.3 XRD study of the specimens synthesized with varying sonication times
The X-ray diffractograms of the specimens synthesized using differing sonication
times are shown in Figure 6. What is obvious from the figure is that the titanium dioxide
synthesized by the US method shows the presence of 100% rutile (due to absence of any
peak at 2 = 25°) when calcinated at 750°C irrespective of the amount of sonication time
used during the synthesis. From the diffractograms we can get the data related to the %
Rutile, % crystallinity and crystallite sizes of the specimens and which is shown in Figure
7, Figure 8 and Table 3 respectively.
From Figure 7 it is seen that there is no difference in the % Rutile values (≈100%)
obtained for the three US synthesized specimens while the NUS specimen (TNUS 3)
shows a much lower % Rutile value and therefore we can conclude that the US process
indeed, hugely accelerates the phase transformation in titanium dioxide from anatase to
rutile.
The trend in % crystallinty (Figure 8) also reflects the trend in the rutile content.
The Rutile polymorph of TiO2 shows better packing and more stable crystalline structure
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
than the meta-stable anatase polymorph and therefore the US specimens which show
rutile as the pre-dominant phase, therefore, show higher % crystallinity than the single
NUS specimen. However, it is seen that the specimen TUS 3 is showing the highest %
crystallinity amongst all. To explain this we have to study the trends in crystallite size
and also the yield of the reaction.
The values of crystallite size (Table 3) show that the specimen TUS 3 is having
the highest crystallite size. This further seems to indicate that TUS 3 is that specimen
which is having the most rutile character out of the rest. However, there is not much of a
significant difference in that aspect amongst the US specimens but they do show a
marked increase in rutile content and crystallinity from the lone NUS specimen.
4.4 % yield study of the specimen obtained using various sonication times
The % yields obtained for the various specimens are seen in Table 4. It is seen
again that the US specimens show a good improvement in the % yields as compared to
the NUS specimen which is attributed to the reasons extensively discussed in the
beginning of Section 4. It is seen that initially as the sonication time is increased we see
an increase in the yield from TUS(5) to TUS 3 and thereafter we see a decrease in %
yield from TUS 3 to TUS(15). This is attributed to the fact that as the sonication time is
increased, the extent of bubble collapse occurring in the system increases and an
increased exposure to such cavitating conditions results in improvement in mass transfer
and reaction rates and thus a consequent increase in yields. However, as the sonication
time the reaction system is subjected to increases beyond a certain margin, the high
instantaneous temperatures generated in the reaction system will result in partial
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
vapourisation of the volatile 2-propanol used as the reaction medium. This results in a
shift of the reaction equilibrium to the left by Le-Chatelier’s principle and therefore we
see a reduction the yields. In addition, the high velocity acoustic streaming at higher
sonication times will result also in asymmetric bubble collapse in the fluid, thus totally
disrupting the formation of a close-packed crystal structure. Therefore, the TiO2
synthesized at higher sonic time input shows lower % crystallinity which is seen in the
values obtained in Figure 8. in the case of TUS 3 (ie a 10 minute sonication time ) the
likely scenario is that there would be an ideal balance between high temperature and
high energy collapse which would not cause local volatilization of 2-propanol but rather
the generated heat energy would be utilized solely for accelerating the phase
transformation process.
4.5 SEM study of the specimens synthesized at various sonication times
The SEM micrographs of the specimens synthesized at various sonication times
are shown in Figure 9. It is seen that with increase in sonication times we see a slow
development of a block type structure in the synthesized TiO2. The development of an
ordered surface morphology is hence, a characteristic of the US process. The structure
however, seems to vanish at the specimen TUS(15) which seems to suggest that the
higher sonication times are having a detrimental effect on the synthesized product. At
lower sonication times, the heat generated due to bubble collapse hastens the phase
transformation from a meta-stable anatase to more stable and crystalline rutile form
which thereby shows an increasingly ordered surface morphology but at higher
sonication times the integrity of the block type structure is lost. It may be due to the fact
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
that the more sustained impact of the acoustic shock waves at higher sonication times, on
the surface of the TiO2 ruptures the formed block type structure.
5. Conclusion
The effect of calcination and sonication time on the phase transformation of sol-
gel synthesized (conventional and ultrasound-assisted) TiO2 was studied. It was found
that with increasing calcination time (at constant temperature of 750°C), there was an
increase in the rutile content of the specimens, signifying that at lower calcination times
the entire bulk of the specimen could not be exposed to the high temperature thereby the
meta-stable anatase phase was intact. The introduction of ultrasound and hence, acoustic
cavitation as a reaction aid helped produce specimens with a lesser degree of
agglomeration and thus helped the high temperature reach the inner recesses of the
specimen quicker, hastening the phase transformation and achieve 100% conversion from
the anatase phase (favoured by the conventional sol-gel process) to the rutile phase. After
the optimization of calcination time was set at 3 h, the sonication time was also vaied to
study the effect of sustained ultrasound contact on the reaction system. It was seen that as
the sonication time was increased from 0 (NUS) to 10 min, there is an increase in the
rutile content, crystallinity and % yields. Increase beyond that time resulted in a
detrimental effect on the system due to the cavity collapse energy being utilized for
purposes other than accelerating phase transformation. Thus, a calcination time of 3 h and
a sonication time of 10 min were determined as being the optimum parameters for
obtaining 100% rutile TiO2.
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
6. References
1. G. Skandan, A. Singhal, Nanomaterials Handbook, Ed. Gugotsi, Y. Taylor
Francis, NY, 2006.
2. US PAT 6858666, 2005
3. K.M.S. Khalil and M.I. Zaki, “Preparation and characterization of sol–gel derived
mesoporous titania spheroids”, Powder Technology 120, (2001), 256–263.
4. A. Hosseinnia, M. Keyanpour-Rad, M. Kazemzad, M. Pazouki, “A novel
approach for preparation of highly crystalline anatase TiO2 nanopowder from the
agglomerates”, Powder Technology, 190(3), (2009), 390-392.
5. H. Choi, E. Stathatos, D. Dionysiou, “Sol–gel preparation of mesoporous
photocatalytic TiO2 films and TiO2/Al2O3 composite membranes for
environmental applications”, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 63, (2006), 60–
67.
6. S. Rani, P. Suri, P.K. Shishodia, R.M. Mehra, “Synthesis of nanocrystalline ZnO
powder via sol–gel route for dye-sensitized solar cells”, Solar Energy Materials &
Solar Cells 92, (2008), 1639–1645.
7. L. Donga, Y.C. Liub, Y.H. Tongb, Z.Y. Xiaoa, J.Y. Zhanga, Y.M. Lua, D.Z.
Shena, X.W. Fana, “Preparation of ZnO colloids by aggregation of the
nanocrystal subunits”, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 283, (2005), 380-
384
8. F. Grasset, R. Marchand, A.-M. Marie, D. Fauchadour, F. Fajardie, “Synthesis of
CeO2/SiO2 core–shell nanoparticles by water-in-oil microemulsion. Preparation of
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
functional thin film”, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 299, (2006), 726–
732
9. J. Li, Y. Hao, H. Li, M. Xia, X. Sun, L. Wang, “Direct synthesis of CeO 2/SiO2
mesostructured composite materials via sol–gel process”, Microporous and
Mesoporous Materials, 120, (2009), 421-425.
10. W. Wang, Y. Pang, S. Hodgson, “XRD studies of thermally stable mesoporous
tungsten oxide synthesised by a templated sol– gel process from tungstic acid
precursor”, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 121, (2009), 121-128
11. N. K. Chaudhary, Defence Science Journal, 57, (2007), 241-253.
12. D.S. Bhatkhande, V.G. Pangakar, A. Beenackers, J. Chemtech. Biotech., 77,
(2001), 102.
13. K. Prasad, D. V. Pinjari A. B. Pandit, S. T. Mhaske, “Phase Transformation of
nanostructured Titanium dioxide from anatase-to-rutile via combined ultrasound
assisted sol-gel technique”, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 17,(2010), 409-415.
14. Y. Pu, J. Fang, F. Peng, B. Li and L. Huang, “Microemulsion Synthesis of
Nanosized SiO2/TiO2 Particles and Their Photocatalytic Activity”, Chinese
Journal of Catalysis, 28, (2007), 251-256.
15. A. Spurr, H. Myers, “Quantitative analysis of anatase–rutile mixtures with X-ray
diffractometer”, Analytical Chemistry, 29, (1957), 760–762.
16. K. Prasad, D. V. Pinjari A. B. Pandit, S. T. Mhaske, "Synthesis of titanium
dioxide by ultrasound assisted sol–gel technique: Effect of amplitude (power
density) variation", Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 17, (2010), 697-703.
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
List of table and figures
Table
Table 1: Crystallite size (nm) and dominant crystalline phase of the TiO2 specimens
synthesized at different calcination times.
Table 2: Average % yields obtained for the NUS and US sol-gel processes
Table 3: Crystallite sizes of the specimens synthesized using varied sonication times
Table 4: % Yields of the specimens obtained using varied sonication times
Figures
Figure 1: X-ray diffraction patterns of conventional sol-gel synthesized nano-TiO2 at
various calcination times.
Figure 2: X-ray diffraction patterns of ultrasound assisted sol-gel synthesized nano-TiO2
at various calcination times.
Figure 3: Variation of % Rutile of the TiO2 specimens (NUS and US) with calcination
time.
Figure 4: Variation of % crystallinity of the TiO2 specimens (NUS and US) with
calcination time.
Figure 5: SEM Micrographs of Synthesized TiO2: (A) TNUS 3 at 10000X, (B) TUS 3 at
10000X.
Figure 6: X-Ray diffractograms of the specimens synthesized at various sonication times.
Figure 7: % Rutile of the specimens synthesized at various sonication times.
Figure 8: % Crystallinity of the specimens synthesized using various sonication times.
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
Figure 9: SEM micrographs of the specimens synthesized using various sonication times.
A: TNUS 3, B: TUS(5), C: TUS 3, D: TUS(15).
470
471