If you can't read please download the document
Upload
abhishek-upadhyay
View
270
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Method fo Solving a sudden case
Citation preview
2. FLOW OF CASE
3. Cont..
4. DEFINING THE PROBLEM (SCOPE)
5. ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS OF THE CASE 1: Basic problem confronted by Subodh . Justification:- Mr. Subodh having Technical Knowledge notmangerial competance skills. 2: Is Manager or Engineer are Different ? Justification:-Yes, Engineering involves Technology and hence, required knowledge of science but management required integration of science as well as art. 6. Contd....
7. Contd
8. CONCLUSION For Instance, .We conclude that Mr. Subhodh is anQualitative and effective engineer as he worked as design Engineer Since last 5 years and achieved good knowledge about technical and Engineering experience by updating himself through Conference and workshops. He was Widely recognized as innovative contributor for the company. Hence, We Can say that he Should promoted to senior engineer and take proper utilization in research and development For industrial leadership to the Fruitful business. 9. THANK YOU 10. BEST OF LUCKTO ALL OTHER PARTICIPANTS