Upload
elwin-green
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
THE 2010 ILLINOIS RURAL LIFE POLL PRESENTATION TO THE 2011 DOWNSTATE SUMMIT
Chris Merrett, Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs, Western Illinois University
Financial Support Provided by Rural Partners
Introduction
From Capital Fax – September 12, 2011
“ The President and CEO of the Illinois Chamber of Commerce Doug Whitley was quoted saying something interesting the other day…
Whitley said one of the problems facing Illinois is that ‘Cook County people are out of touch with the pain of the people of downstate Illinois.’”
Freeport (IL) Journal Standard, September 10. Online:http://www.journalstandard.com/news/business/x1413024114/Whitley-touts-importance-of-limiting-government-s-scope.
The question posed by Capital Fax…
“Do you agree with Whitley? Take the poll and then tell us why or why not. Also, please tell us which Illinois region you call home. Thanks.”
Results of 647 respondents: 73.5% agreed (476) 26.5% disagreed (171)
Agreed Disagreed0
102030405060708090
100
73.5
26.5
Responses to Cap-ital Fax
Perc
en
t
Voting Pattern of Capital Fax Survey
Purpose Outline
Implications of Capital Fax survey… Polarization is serious.
Report on the 2010 Illinois Rural Life Poll. Explore extent to
which polarization exists.
Identify areas of common ground between rural and urban Illinois.
1. Illinois Rural Life Poll (IRLP).a) Structure and
Rationale.b) IRLP Survey Results.c) Conclusions.
2. Conclusions and Comments.
1(a). IRLP Structure & Rationale
1(a). IRLP Structure and Rationale Trend Data Shows:
Long term economic and demographic stagnation / decline.
Where to find solutions to this socioeconomic malaise? Ask residents of rural communities.
Illinois Rural Life Poll conducted by the IIRA. Financial support from Rural Partners.
Metadata Survey during fall 2010. Surveys sent to 8,000 residents across Illinois. Responses received from 1,087 individuals. Response rate of 13.6 percent. 54.8% Non-metro and 45.2% metro. Age bias reflected in survey respondents.
1(a). IRLP Structure and Rationale Survey Structure
Part I Quality of life measures. Adequacy of existing services and infrastructure.
Part II Looking to the future. Importance of specific services (e.g. health),
amenities (e.g. recreation), and infrastructure (e.g. roads and IT) to improving rural communities.
Part III Background information about respondents. Demographics, location, educational attainment,
etc.
1(b). Survey Results
PART I: QUALITY OF LIFE
Nonmetro Metro Stat.
All Responde
nts
Question Mean Mean Sig. Mean• During the last five years, the
quality of life in your community has become...
2.62 2.79 Y 2.69
• During the last five years, the quality of life in your family has become...
3.05 3.20 Y 3.12
• In the next five years, the quality of life in your community will become...
2.82 3.08 Y 2.94
• In the next five years, the quality of life in your family will be... 3.25 3.41 Y 3.32
• In the next five years, the overall economic prospects for rural Illinois families will be...
2.42 2.57 Y 2.49
• Compared to a year ago, your financial situation today has become...
2.80 2.85 N 2.82
Coding: 1=Much Worse to 5=Much Better.Source: IIRA's Illinois Rural Life Poll, Fall/Winter 2010, Final Data, n=1,087.
PART I: CURRENT SERVICESMetropolitan Status of
County
Nonmetro Metro Stat.
All Responde
ntsService Category Mean Mean Sig. Mean
1. Library services 4.03 4.12 N 4.082. Parks and recreation 3.70 4.12 Y 3.883. Solid waste disposal 3.70 3.95 Y 3.814. Law enforcement 3.60 3.98 Y 3.775. Access to Internet 3.60 3.89 Y 3.766. Basic medical care services 3.55 3.94 Y 3.737. Housing 3.31 3.73 Y 3.508. Senior centers and services 3.53 3.45 N 3.499. Education (K-12) 3.43 3.42 N 3.4310. Day care services 3.22 3.43 Y 3.3111. Entertainment 2.90 3.52 Y 3.2012. Mental health services 3.09 3.33 Y 3.20
13. Public transit & transportation 2.73 3.21 Y 2.96
14. Local government 2.84 2.94 N 2.90
Coding: 1=Very Dissatisfied to 5=Very Satisfied.Source: IIRA's Illinois Rural Life Poll, Fall/Winter 2010, Final Data, n=1,087.
PART II: LOCAL ECONOMYMetropolitan Status of
County
Nonmetro Metro Stat.
All Responde
nts
Issues Mean Mean Sig. Mean1. Availability of local jobs that
match residents' education 4.32 4.31 N 4.32
2. Local job advancement possibilities 4.31 4.28 N 4.29
3. Ability to buy essential items locally 4.31 4.21 N 4.27
4. Enough skilled trades in area to meet demand 4.28 4.15 Y 4.23
5. Attract high paying local jobs 4.23 4.19 N 4.216. People moving into the
community 4.16 4.13 N 4.15
7. People leaving the community 4.14 3.97 Y 4.078. Attract more retail businesses to
downtown 4.11 3.96 Y 4.04
9. Ability to purchase local goods and services online 3.24 3.26 N 3.24
Coding: 1=Unimportant to 5=Very Important.Source: IIRA's Illinois Rural Life Poll, Fall/Winter 2010, Final Data, n=1,087.
PART II: YOUTH, EDUCATION, AND WORKFORCE TRAINING
Metropolitan Status of County
Nonmetro Metro Stat.
All Respond
ents
Issues Mean Mean Sig. Mean1. Quality of schools 4.67 4.68 N 4.67
2. Ability of local schools to prepare students for college 4.60 4.62 N 4.61
3. Adequacy of school funding 4.60 4.50 Y 4.56
4. Adequacy of work training opportunities in region 4.48 4.42 N 4.45
5. Ability of local schools to train students for jobs 4.44 4.45 N 4.44
6. Improve course offerings in schools 4.28 4.27 N 4.27
7. Youth leaving the community 4.34 4.08 Y 4.23
8. Adequacy of Internet access in schools 4.09 4.09 N 4.08
Coding: 1=Unimportant to 5=Very Important.Source: IIRA's Illinois Rural Life Poll, Fall/Winter 2010, Final Data, n=1,087.
Part II. AgricultureMetropolitan Status of
County
Nonmetro Metro Stat.
All Respond
entsIssues Mean Mean Sig. Mean
1. Creating facilities and jobs to produce clean energy 4.24 4.12 N 4.19
2. Availability of locally produced food 4.14 4.17 N 4.163. Development of commercial uses for
waste products 4.10 4.16 N 4.124. Information about opportunities to use
agricultural products in economic development 4.15 4.01 Y 4.09
5. Value-added agriculture 4.11 4.00 N 4.07
6. Creating wind energy facilities 3.88 3.88 N 3.88
7. Creating biofuels facilities, such as biodiesel 3.87 3.76 N 3.82
Coding: 1=Unimportant to 5=Very Important.
Source: IIRA's Illinois Rural Life Poll, Fall/Winter 2010, Final Data, n=1,087.
PART II: HEALTH, HOUSING AND WELFAREMetropolitan Status of
County
Nonmetro Metro
Stat.
All Responde
ntsIssues Mean Mean Sig. Mean1. Affordable health care 4.76 4.71 N 4.732. Access and availability of health insurance 4.65 4.64 N 4.63
3. Local access to health care (doctors, dentists, etc.) 4.58 4.51 N 4.55
4. Preserve local hospitals 4.52 4.54 N 4.545. Access to ambulance service 4.58 4.49 N 4.546. Facilities / services for elderly 4.50 4.43 N 4.477. Local access to specialized health care (MRI, etc.) 4.45 4.44 N 4.46
8. Availability of housing for elderly residents 4.47 4.46 N 4.45
9. Availability of affordable housing 4.37 4.37 N 4.3710. Preserve public health department 4.36 4.23 Y 4.3211. Housing for young families 4.33 4.25 N 4.2912. Recreation and services for teenagers 4.33 4.21 Y 4.2713. Affordable child care 4.32 4.18 Y 4.2514. Recreation / services for young children 4.30 4.14 Y 4.22
15. Local access to mental health services 4.17 4.07 N 4.14
Coding: 1=Unimportant to 5=Very Important.Source: IIRA's Illinois Rural Life Poll, Fall/Winter 2010, Final Data, n=1,087.
PART II: PUBLIC SERVICESMetropolitan Status
of County
Nonmetro Metro
Stat.
All Respond
entsIssues Mean Mean Sig. Mean1. Responsiveness of state agencies to local
requests 4.23 4.25 N 4.23
2. Quality of cooperation among local governments to provide services 4.09 4.12 N 4.10
3. Better coordination in providing public services 3.91 3.92 N 3.91
4. Amount of services provided by local government 3.83 3.78 N 3.81
5. Greater access to state government by citizens (via public hearings, etc.) 3.83 3.76 N 3.80
6. Technology to deliver government services to residents 3.74 3.73 N 3.75
7. Duplication or overlap of state agencies 3.69 3.81 N 3.74
8. Easier access to state government services (via Internet, etc.) 3.66 3.71 N 3.68
9. Easier access to local government services (via Internet, etc.) 3.60 3.66 N 3.63
10. Adequacy of public transportation 3.55 3.63 N 3.59Coding: 1=Unimportant to 5=Very Important.
PART III: DEMOGRAPHICSAll Respondents
Characteristic Percent No.
Gender
Male 59.9% 646
Female 40.1% 433
What is your current marital status?
Married 66.2% 710
Single, never married 5.4% 58
Widowed 15.3% 164
Divorced/separated 10.8% 116
Living together/partner 2.2% 24
Highest level of formal education you have completed?
Less than a high school degree 3.3% 35
High school degree/GED 23.3% 249
Some college (no degree) 26.1% 279
Associate (two-year) degree 9.3% 99
Bachelors (four-year) degree 12.5% 133
Some graduate work 6.5% 69
Graduate degree or higher 19.1% 204
Source: IIRA's Illinois Rural Life Poll 2010, Final Data, N = 1,087
PART III: DEMOGRAPHICSAll Respondents
Characteristic Percent No.
Age Category
Under 40 Years Old 5.9% 63
40 to 64 Years Old 49.6% 526
65 to 74 Years Old 24.0% 254
75 Years and Older 20.5% 217
No. children less than 18 years of age currently living in your home?
No children under 18 years old 84.4% 914
One child 4.7% 51
Two children 7.2% 78
Three children 2.5% 27
Four or more children 1.2% 13
Home Ownership
Own your home 93.1% 983
Rent your home 6.9% 73
PART III: DEMOGRAPHICSAll Respondents
Characteristic Percent No.Which of the following best describes where you live?In a town 64.1% 688On a farm 7.3% 78In the country, not a farm 15.4% 165In a rural subdivision 12.6% 135Other 0.7% 7
Community SizeUnder 5,000 population 39.6% 4145,000 - 9,999 population 16.8% 17610,000 - 24,999 population 20.5% 21425,000 and larger population 23.1% 242
Metro 2003Nonmetro 54.8% 550Metro 45.2% 454
Regions basedNorth 21.6% 217Central 29.6% 297South-central 23.5% 236South 25.2% 253
1(b). Survey Results – Some Written Comments 25 pages of written comments Attract business to our area -
We need jobs! Better politics Bring in more jobs, better retail
stores Cellulosic ethanol not corn based Clean coal technology very
important for this area Ethanol is over rated Expansion of gas stations to
carry E85 Get the government out of our
lives High speed internet to rural
residents Improve education funding Improvement of health care
insurance availability Jobs related to energy production
(Green Energy)
Local grocery store & local transportation
Chicago gets all the money in Illinois. Change that.
Excellent survey This was goofy. Modernize local government None of Your Damn Business!!! Thanks for asking! Somebody
cares! The poor are poorer - the rich are
richer - nothing will change that - and asking questions is just busy work to occupy your time until payday.
We don't have a M.D. in our county. We have to drive at least 35 miles to large stores. We need more businesses in our county.
What R yall doin to help us?
1(c). Conclusions and Questions
1(c). Conclusions
See importance of issues across geographies. Jobs, healthcare and education highly ranked
regardless of metro or non-metro location. See areas of difference between rural and urban
regions. Rural respondents were less optimistic and had greater concerns for the following issues: Current life situation Optimism for the future Internet access Local government Transit resources School funding Youth leaving Skilled jobs
2. Conclusions and Questions
2. Conclusions and Questions
Return to initial commentary from Capital Fax: Reaffirm that Rural versus Urban differences exist, persist,
and still matter. But also see that extensive common ground exists
between rural and urban residents in Illinois. How can we build bridges with urban / upstate
stakeholders as we seek solutions to unique downstate challenges?
Look forward to today’s discussions about downstate issues. The IRLP hopefully provides one dataset to help us
better understand those issues. Plans to conduct IRLP every two years.
Welcome questions or comments about this presentation.
Contact Information
Christopher D. Merrett, PhD, DirectorIllinois Institute for Rural AffairsWestern Illinois UniversityMacomb, IL 61455309-298-2281http://[email protected]