29
TOP-DOWN NETWORK DESIGN CHAPTER THREE CHARACTERIZING THE EXISTING INTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

TOP-DOWN NETWORK DESIGN

CHAPTER THREE

CHARACTERIZING THE EXISTING INTERNETWORK

Oppenheimer

Page 2: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

To judge how to meet expectations for network scalability, performance, and availability

OBJECTIVES

AAB-2013 2

1

2

3

To learn about the topology and physical structure, and assessing the network’s performance

To describe techniques and tools in characterizing an incumbent network

Page 3: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

THE EXISTING NETWORK

We now know where we want to go based on the analysis that was just done

We next need to determine where we are starting from

If this is an entirely new network, this step does not need to be done

AAB-2013

3

Page 4: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

CHARACTERIZING THE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE

•Developing a set of network maps and learning the location of major internetworking devices and network segments.

AAB-2013

4

Page 5: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

DEVELOPING A NETWORK MAP

Need to understand the traffic flow by learning the location of major hosts, interconnecting devices and network segments.

Goal is to obtain the network map/maps of the already implemented network.

Tools for developing network map:

Some customer don’t have existing map

Find good network-diagramming tool i.e. Cisco work, HP open view etc..

AAB-2013

5

Page 6: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

GET A NETWORK MAP: PURPOSE

Learn the location of major hosts, interconnection devices, and network segments for better understanding of traffic flow.

Remember! Your aim at this step is to obtain a map (or set of maps) of the already-implemented network.

You are one step ahead if the customers are already have maps for the new network design designer have to check the detailed analysis of business and technical requirements

AAB-2013

6

Page 7: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

INFORMATION TO COLLECT Characterize the existing internetwork in terms of:

Its infrastructure

• Logical structure Logical topology = illustrates the architecture of the network

It can be flat or hierarchical, structured or unstructured, layered or not

Its also describes methods for connecting devices in a geometric shape – star , ring, bus, hub or mesh

Discuss further in chapter 5!!

Physical structure/components

Developing a modular block diagram – figure 3-2 page 69

Addressing and naming

Wiring and media

Architectural and environmental constraints

AAB-2013

7

Page 8: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

GET A NETWORK MAP: INFORMATION TO

COLLECT A network map is the first thing to work on

This map should include

Geographic locations

WAN connections between sites Labeled with type/speed/protocols/media/service provider

Buildings and floors where equipment will be

Connections between buildings and floors Labeled with type/speed/protocols/media

AAB-2013

8

Page 9: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

GET A NETWORK MAP: INFORMATION TO

COLLECT Location of connection points like routers and switches

Internet connections

Remote access points

A baseline will be needed as this will tell you where the network is today

AAB-2013

9

Page 10: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

GET A NETWORK MAP-EXAMPLE

AAB-2013

10

Gigabit Ethernet

Eugene Ethernet20 users

Web/FTP server

Grants PassHQ

16 MbpsToken Ring

FEP (Front End Processor)

IBMMainframeT1

MedfordFast Ethernet

50 users

RoseburgFast Ethernet

30 usersFrame Relay

CIR = 56 KbpsDLCI = 5

Frame RelayCIR = 56 Kbps

DLCI = 4

Grants PassHQ

Fast Ethernet75 users

InternetT1

Page 11: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

CHARACTERIZE ADDRESSING AND

NAMING IP addressing for major devices, client networks, server

networks, and so on

Any addressing oddities, such as discontiguous subnets?

Discontiguous subnet = is a subnet that is divided

Figure 3-3 pg 69 (text book)

Any strategies for addressing and naming?

For example, sites may be named using airport codes San Francisco = SFO, Oakland = OAK

AAB-2013

11

Page 12: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

CHARACTERIZE THE WIRING AND MEDIA

Single-mode fiber

Multi-mode fiber

Shielded twisted pair (STP) copper

Unshielded-twisted-pair (UTP) copper

Coaxial cable

Microwave

Laser

Radio

Infra-red

AAB-2013

12

Page 13: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

WHAT SHOULD BE DOCUMENTED???

• To meet scalability and availability goals for new network design, it is important to understand the cabling and wiring of the existing network.

• documenting the existing cabling can help in designing for an enhancement and identify potential problems.

• It is also good to document the cable distance as this information is useful when selecting data link layer technologies based on distance restrictions

• Should document also the connections between buildings. Include the info on the number of pairs of wires and the type of wiring/wireless tech in use.

• should also indicate the distance between buildings- this help in selecting new cabling , i.e. upgrade from copper to fiber hence the distance between building can be much longer.

AAB-2013

13

Page 14: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

TelecommunicationsWiring Closet

HorizontalWiring

Work-AreaWiring

Wallplate

Main Cross-Connect Room(or Main Distribution Frame)

Intermediate Cross-Connect Room(or Intermediate Distribution Frame)

Building A - Headquarters Building B

VerticalWiring

(BuildingBackbone)

CampusBackbone

CAMPUS NETWORK WIRING

AAB-2013

14

Page 15: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

EXAMPLE: BUILDING WIRING

AAB-2013

15

Page 16: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

ARCHITECTURAL CONSTRAINTS

Make sure the following are sufficient

Air conditioning

Heating

Ventilation

Power

Protection from electromagnetic interference

Doors that can lock

AAB-2013

16

Page 17: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

ARCHITECTURAL CONSTRAINTS

Make sure there’s space for:

Cabling conduits

Patch panels

Equipment racks

Work areas for technicians installing and troubleshooting equipment

AAB-2013

17

Page 18: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

CHECKING A SITE FOR A WIRELESS

INSTALLATION

Wireless site survey – to describe the process of analyzing a site to see if it will be appropriate for wireless transmission.

It starts with a draft WLAN design.

Decide on placement of the wireless access point.

the initial placement of the AP is based on an estimate of the signal loss that will occur between the AP and the users of the AP.

AAB-2013

18

Page 19: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

ISSUES FOR WIRELESS INSTALLATIONS

Reflection-Reflection causes the signal to bounce back on itself.

Absorption-Some of the electromagnetic energy of the signal can be absorbed by the material in objects through which it passes, resulting in a reduced signal level.

Refraction-When an RF signal passes from a medium with one density into a medium with another density, the signal can be bent, much like light passing through a prism.

Diffraction-similar to refraction, results when a region through which the RF signal can pass easily is adjacent to a region in which reflective obstructions exist.

Spreading occurs in the diffraction process

[http://www.ask.com/question/difference-between-refraction-and-diffraction].

AAB-2013

19

Page 20: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

CHECK THE HEALTH OF THE EXISTING

INTERNETWORK Performance

Availability

Bandwidth utilization

Accuracy

Efficiency

Response time

Status of major routers, switches, and firewalls

AAB-2013

20

Page 21: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

17:10:00

17:07:00

17:04:00

17:01:00

16:58:00

16:55:00

16:52:00

16:49:00

16:46:00

16:43:00

16:40:00

Utilization

Tim

e

Network Utilization

NETWORK UTILIZATION IN MINUTE INTERVALS

AAB-2013

21

Page 22: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5

17:00:00

16:00:00

15:00:00

14:00:00

13:00:00

Utilization

Tim

e

Network Utilization

NETWORK UTILIZATION IN HOUR INTERVALS

AAB-2013

22

Page 23: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

CHARACTERIZE PACKET SIZES

AAB-2013

23

Page 24: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

Node A

Node B

Node C

Node D

Node A Node B Node C Node D

X

X

X

X

CHARACTERIZE RESPONSE TIME

AAB-2013

24

Page 25: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

CHECK THE STATUS OF MAJOR ROUTERS,

SWITCHES, AND FIREWALLS show buffers

show environment

show interfaces

show memory

show processes

show running-config

show version

AAB-2013

25

Page 26: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

TOOLS Protocol analyzers

Multi Router Traffic Grapher (MRTG)

Remote monitoring (RMON) probes

Cisco Discovery Protocol (CDP)

Cisco IOS NetFlow technology

CiscoWorks

Cisco IOS Service Assurance Agent (SAA)

Cisco Internetwork Performance Monitor (IPM)

AAB-2013

26

Page 27: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

AAB-2013

27

Page 28: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

SUMMARY Characterize the exiting internetwork before designing

enhancements

Helps you verify that a customer’s design goals are realistic

Helps you locate where new equipment will go

Helps you cover yourself if the new network has problems due to unresolved problems in the old network

AAB-2013

28

Page 29: T OP -D OWN N ETWORK D ESIGN C HAPTER T HREE C HARACTERIZING THE E XISTING I NTERNETWORK Oppenheimer

REVIEW QUESTIONS

What factors will help you decide if the existing internetwork is in good enough shape to support new enhancements?

When considering protocol behavior, what is the difference between relative network utilization and absolute network utilization?

Why should you characterize the logical structure of an internetwork and not just the physical structure?

What architectural and environmental factors should you consider for a new wireless installation?

AAB-2013

29