29
T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

T24_vg1.8_disk11WNSDVG1.8

CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz

measurements versus simulations

A. Grudiev

CERN

1.07.2009

Page 2: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

Acknowledgements

CERN:M. GerbauxR. ZennaroA. OlyuninW. Wuensch

SLAC:Z. Li

Page 3: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

First cellHs/EaEs/Ea Sc/Ea

2

a [mm] 3.307

d [mm] 1.753

e 1.16

f [GHz] 11.433

Q(Cu) 6814

vg/c [%] 1.83

r’/Q [Linac /m] 15198

Es/Ea 1.95

Hs/Ea [mA/V] 2.6

Sc/Ea2 [mA/V] 0.37

Page 4: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

Middle cellHs/EaEs/Ea Sc/Ea

2

a [mm] 2.887

d [mm] 1.402

e 1.15

f [GHz] 11.432

Q(Cu) 6980

vg/c [%] 1.33

r’/Q [Linac /m] 16960

Es/Ea 1.95

Hs/Ea [mA/V] 2.45

Sc/Ea2 [mA/V] 0.34

Page 5: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

Last cellHs/EaEs/Ea Sc/Ea

2

a [mm] 2.467

d [mm] 1.05

e 1.13

f [GHz] 11.426

Q(Cu) 7157

vg/c [%] 0.92

r’/Q [Linac /m] 18713

Es/Ea 1.9

Hs/Ea [mA/V] 2.3

Sc/Ea2 [mA/V] 0.28

Page 6: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

Gradient in 24 regular cells

Number of regular cells: Nc 24

Bunch population: N 3.72x109

Number of bunches: Nb 312

Bunch separation: Ncycl 6 rf cycles

6

Average unloaded of 100 MV/m Average loaded of 100 MV/m

0 4 8 12 16 20 24240

50

100

150

200

250

iris number

P [M

W] (

blac

k), E

s (gre

en),

Ea (r

ed) [

MV/

m],

T [K

] (bl

ue),

Sc*5

0 [M

W/m

m2 ] (

mag

enta

)

7.5 8.4

176

205

3.03.2

90

108

41.1

23.4

Pinload = 41.1 MW, Pout

load = 23.4 MWEff = 0.0 %tr = 0.0 ns, tf = 0.0 ns, tp = 100.0 ns

0 4 8 12 16 20 240

50

100

150

200

250

iris number

P [M

W] (

blac

k), E

s (gre

en),

Ea (r

ed) [

MV

/m],

T [K

] (bl

ue),

Sc*5

0 [M

W/m

m2 ] (

mag

enta

)

15.0 16.8

206

240

4.1

4.5

105

126

56.4

32.2

Pinload = 56.4 MW, Pout

load = 14.7 MWEff = 28.9 %tr = 20.7 ns, tf = 54.8 ns, tp = 238.8 ns

21' PI

QR

vP

QvdzdP

gg

Page 7: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

Simulation setup 1 & 2HFSS-quad

HFSS simulation of ¼ of the structure:Surface conductivity (Cu): 58e6 S/mSurface approximation: ds=6 m,Total number of tetrahedra: Ntetr = 1170348Mesh density: ~ 40000 tetr / ¼ cell

S3P-quadS3P simulation of ¼ of the structure made byZenghai Li at SLAC-ACDSurface conductivity (Cu): 57e6 S/m different

HFSS v10.1

Page 8: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

Simulation setup 3HFSS-cells + couplers

HFSS simulation of ¼ of input coupler + segment of 5 deg. of the cells + ¼ of output coupler :Surface conductivity (Cu): 58e6 S/mSurface approximation: ds=1 m,Total number of tetrahedra for cells: Ntetr = 506075Mesh density: ~ 350000 tetr / ¼ cell(10 times higher than in HFSS-quad setup)

HFSS v11.1

Page 9: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

Measurement setup 1 (reflections)

Perfectload

Perfectload

VNAport1

VNAport2

1

2 3

4

Reflection = S11+S12

Frequency correction due to air ( = 1.00059)Frequency in vacuum: f’ = f*sqrt(1.00059) f + 3.5 MHz @ X-band

Page 10: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

Reflection: comparison

There is very small (~1MHz) or no difference in frequency betweensimulations and the air corrected measurements

11.4 11.405 11.41 11.415 11.42 11.425 11.43 11.435 11.44-45

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0Input

f [GHz]

Ref

lect

ion

[dB

]

measurement (Vac)HFSS-cellsHFSS-quadS3P-quadmode launcher

11.4 11.405 11.41 11.415 11.42 11.425 11.43 11.435 11.44-45

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0Output

f [GHz]R

efle

ctio

n [d

B]

measurement (Vac)HFSS-cellsHFSS-quadS3P-quadmode launcher

Page 11: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

1

2 3

4

Measurement setup 2 (transmission)Perfect load

Perfect load

VNA port1

VNA port2

Transmission = S13+S23

1

2 3

4

Perfect load

VNA port2VNA port1

Perfect load

Page 12: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

Transmission: comparison

• There is small differencebetween HFSS and S3Psimulation results due todifferent conductivityused in the simulations• Both simulation resultsshow higher transmissionthan air correctedmeasurements by about0.2 dB

11.4 11.405 11.41 11.415 11.42 11.425 11.43 11.435 11.44-3.6

-3.4

-3.2

-3

-2.8

-2.6

-2.4

f [GHz]

Tran

smis

ion

[dB

]

measurement (Vac)HFSS-cellsHFSS-quadS3P-quad

Page 13: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

Some useful equations

nattenuatioln 122 where SePP inout

structurelossfreeinenergystored-structurelossyinenergystored-

delaygroup timefilling-)arg(

factorqualityaverage-

0

120

where

WW

dSd

PWt

PWQePP

inf

loss

Qt

inout

f

On the other hand

Finally

2ft

Q

Page 14: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

Transmission: comparing group delay

There is no differencebetween both HFSS and S3Psimulations and the aircorrected measurements

11.4 11.405 11.41 11.415 11.42 11.425 11.43 11.435 11.4454

56

58

60

62

64

66

f [GHz]

d/d

[ns]

measurement (Vac)HFSS-cellsS3P-quad

Page 15: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

Transmission: comparing Q-factor

• There is no difference inQ-factor (~7000) betweenHFSS and S3P simulations.• The measured Q-factorof about 6600 is lowerthan the simulated valueby about 6 %.

11.4 11.405 11.41 11.415 11.42 11.425 11.43 11.435 11.445800

6000

6200

6400

6600

6800

7000

7200

f [GHz]

Q

measurement: (Vac)HFSS-cellsS3P-quad

Page 16: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

Measurement setup 3 (bead pull)

Perfectload

Perfectload

VNAport1

VNAport2

1

2 3

4

E2 ~ S11-<S11>

Page 17: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

-50 0 50-50

0

50

ImE

z [k

V/m

]

f=11.42 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50f=11.421 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50f=11.422 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50

ImE

z [k

V/m

]

f=11.423 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50f=11.424 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50f=11.425 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50

ImE

z [k

V/m

]

f=11.426 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50f=11.427 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50f=11.428 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50

ReEz [kV/m]

ImE

z [k

V/m

]

f=11.429 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50

ReEz [kV/m]

f=11.43 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50

ReEz [kV/m]

f=11.431 GHz

Bead pull in complex plane

-0.05 0 0.05-0.05

0

0.05

ImS

11

f=11.415 GHz

-0.05 0 0.05-0.05

0

0.05

f=11.416 GHz

-0.05 0 0.05-0.05

0

0.05

f=11.417 GHz

-0.05 0 0.05-0.05

0

0.05

ImS

11

f=11.418 GHz

-0.05 0 0.05-0.05

0

0.05

f=11.419 GHz

-0.05 0 0.05-0.05

0

0.05

f=11.42 GHz

-0.05 0 0.05-0.05

0

0.05

ImS

11

f=11.421 GHz

-0.05 0 0.05-0.05

0

0.05

f=11.422 GHz

-0.05 0 0.05-0.05

0

0.05

f=11.423 GHz

-0.05 0 0.05-0.05

0

0.05

ReS11

ImS

11

f=11.424 GHz

-0.05 0 0.05-0.05

0

0.05

ReS11

f=11.425 GHz

-0.05 0 0.05-0.05

0

0.05

ReS11

Measurements: S11-<S11> HFSS-cells: E

Page 18: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

0 100 2000

20

40

|Ez|

[kV

/m]

f=11.42 GHz

0 100 2000

20

40

f=11.421 GHz

0 100 2000

20

40

f=11.422 GHz

0 100 2000

20

40

|Ez|

[kV

/m]

f=11.423 GHz

0 100 2000

20

40

f=11.424 GHz

0 100 2000

20

40

f=11.425 GHz

0 100 2000

20

40

|Ez|

[kV

/m]

f=11.426 GHz

0 100 2000

20

40

f=11.427 GHz

0 100 2000

20

40

f=11.428 GHz

0 100 2000

20

40

z [mm]

|Ez|

[kV

/m]

f=11.429 GHz

0 100 2000

20

40

z [mm]

f=11.43 GHz

0 100 2000

20

40

z [mm]

f=11.431 GHz

200 400 6000

0.1

0.2

|Ez|

[a.u

.]

f=11.415 GHz

200 400 6000

0.1

0.2

f=11.416 GHz

200 400 6000

0.1

0.2

f=11.417 GHz

200 400 6000

0.1

0.2

|Ez|

[a.u

.]

f=11.418 GHz

200 400 6000

0.1

0.2

f=11.419 GHz

200 400 6000

0.1

0.2

f=11.42 GHz

200 400 6000

0.1

0.2

|Ez|

[a.u

.]

f=11.421 GHz

200 400 6000

0.1

0.2

f=11.422 GHz

200 400 6000

0.1

0.2

f=11.423 GHz

200 400 6000

0.1

0.2

z [a.u.]

|Ez|

[a.u

.]

f=11.424 GHz

200 400 6000

0.1

0.2

z [a.u.]

f=11.425 GHz

200 400 6000

0.1

0.2

z [a.u.]

Bead pull: field magnitudeMeasurements: |sqrt(S11-<S11>)| HFSS-cells: |E|

Page 19: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

Field distribution at different frequencies

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 3500

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

z [mm]

|Ez|

[a.u

.]

HFSS-cells: f=11.42 GHzmeasurement: f=11.418 GHz

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 3500

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

z [mm]

|Ez|

[a.u

.]

HFSS-cells: f=11.424 GHzmeasurement: f=11.421 GHz

120o rf phaseadvance percell frequency11.424 GHz

Best matchfrequency11.420 GHz

Page 20: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

RF phase advance per cell at different frequencies

0 5 10 15 20 25-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

niris

dphi

[deg

]

measurement: f=11.421 GHzHFSS-cells: f=11.424 GHzS3P-quad: f=11.424 GHz

120o rf phase advance percell frequency: 11.424 GHz

Best match frequency:11.420 GHz

0 5 10 15 20 25-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

niris

dphi

[de

g]

measurement: f=11.418 GHzHFSS-cells: f=11.42 GHz

Page 21: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

Summary table for T24_vg1.8_disk

S12Pout/Pin

=0.5ln(Pout/Pin)

tf=d /

[ns]

tf=W0/Pin[ns]

Q= tf/2Q= W/(Pin-Pout)

Q= W/Ploss

Pin10024 cells[MW]

Measurements(Vac)

0.715 0.511 0.336 60.9 - 6600 - -

HFSS ¼ 0.732 0.536 0.312 - 58.4 6720 7010 7010

HFSSInCoupOutCoupCells24+2

0.7310.998750.998890.733

0.5340.99750.99780.537

0.3130.00130.00110.311

60.7<-<-

59.9

59.80.460.3659.0

696012700118006910

694013000123006880

664013200123006580 42.2

3-cellsmodel

0.569-0.533

0.282-0.315

- 54.8-59.37

6974-6764

6980 41.1

S3P(SLAC)

0.730 0.533 0.315 60.8 6927 =57e6)

6988 =58e6)

42.4

Page 22: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

Summary on comparison• Simulation results of HFSS and S3P show very good agreement• Q-factor

• All 3 different ways of calculating Q-factor: S3P, HFSS-S-parameter solver andHFSS-eigenmode solver give very close values of about 7000• The measurements of the T24_vg1.8_disk structure made at CERN show 6 %lower Q-factor of 6600

• RF phase advance• Both HFSS and S3P simulations and air corrected measurements simulationsshow 120o rf phase advance frequency of 11.424 GHz which is the designfrequency• Good agreement (± 0.5 MHz) between simulations and measurementsdemonstrates extremely high (sub-micron) precision of machining. For example,it is equivalent to ± 0.6 m tolerance on the outer wall radius RF phase advance

• Structure matching• There is a design error in structure matching of about 4 MHz. The matchfrequency is 11.420 GHz . To some extent this is also in agreement with themeasurements

Page 23: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

HFSS S-par solver: v10.1 versus v11.1

Page 24: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

Simulation setup 4HFSS-cells + couplers

HFSS simulation of ¼ of input coupler+ segment of the cells made in HFSS by 5 deg. Sweep (3D geometry created in HFSS)+ ¼ of output coupler :Surface conductivity (Cu): 58e6 S/mSurface approximation: ds=1 m,

HFSS v11.1 HFSS v10.1versus

Page 25: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

Reflection

4 MHz 4 MHz

11.4 11.405 11.41 11.415 11.42 11.425 11.43 11.435 11.44-45

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0Input

f [GHz]

Ref

lect

ion

[dB

]

HFSS10HFSS11S3P

11.4 11.405 11.41 11.415 11.42 11.425 11.43 11.435 11.44-45

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0Output

f [GHz]R

efle

ctio

n [d

B]

HFSS10HFSS11S3P

Page 26: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

11.4 11.405 11.41 11.415 11.42 11.425 11.43 11.435 11.44-3.2

-3.1

-3

-2.9

-2.8

-2.7

-2.6

-2.5

-2.4

f [GHz]

Tran

smis

ion

[dB

]HFSS10HFSS11S3P

Transmission4 MHz

Page 27: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

Group delay and Q-factor

11.4 11.405 11.41 11.415 11.42 11.425 11.43 11.435 11.4454

56

58

60

62

64

66

f [GHz]

d/d

[ns]

HFSS10HFSS11S3P

11.4 11.405 11.41 11.415 11.42 11.425 11.43 11.435 11.446400

6500

6600

6700

6800

6900

7000

7100

7200

f [GHz]Q

HFSS10HFSS11S3P

Page 28: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

-50 0 50-50

0

50

ImE

z [k

V/m

]

f=11.42 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50f=11.421 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50f=11.422 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50

ImE

z [k

V/m

]

f=11.423 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50f=11.424 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50f=11.425 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50

ImE

z [k

V/m

]

f=11.426 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50f=11.427 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50f=11.428 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50

ReEz [kV/m]

ImE

z [k

V/m

]

f=11.429 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50

ReEz [kV/m]

f=11.43 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50

ReEz [kV/m]

f=11.431 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50

ImE

z [k

V/m

]

f=11.42 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50f=11.421 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50f=11.422 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50

ImE

z [k

V/m

]

f=11.423 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50f=11.424 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50f=11.425 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50

ImE

z [k

V/m

]

f=11.426 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50f=11.427 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50f=11.428 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50

ReEz [kV/m]

ImE

z [k

V/m

]

f=11.429 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50

ReEz [kV/m]

f=11.43 GHz

-50 0 50-50

0

50

ReEz [kV/m]

f=11.431 GHz

RF phase advance per cellHFSS v10.1 HFSS v11.1

Page 29: T24 vg1.8 disk - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · T24_vg1.8_disk 11WNSDVG1.8 CLIC_G un-damped @ 11.424 GHz measurements versus simulations A. Grudiev CERN 1.07.2009

Summary on HFSS

• It seems that there is a bug in HFSS v11.• The results of the simulations using HFSS v11 are shifted up in frequency by4 MHz with respect to the results of the simulations using HFSS v10 or S3P• Use HFSS-S-parameter solver VERSION 10 or S3P