32
RExO T2W Performance Review Data Through 12/31/14 February 2015

T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

RExO

T2W Performance Review Data Through 12/31/14

February 2015

Page 2: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

Program Overview

2

Enrollment Stats

T2W Enrollments at 1543 as of

12/31/14

T2W2 Enrolled 86 (5 of 17

grantees enrolling) in Dec. and

Nov.

T2W System at 62% of Goal

Benchmark for Dec is 50%

Page 3: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

Program Overview

3

Enrollment Stats

Enrollments To Be Completed By

12/31/15 (From Updated DOL

Letter)

Minimum Expectation is 100%

DOL Assigned Goals Based on

Funding Levels

Page 4: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

T2W2 Grantees’ Stats

4

T2W2 Grantee Enrollments

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

CA CO CT FL IL MA HMN

MMN

MO NY OH TX AL NJ GA OK WI

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5

10

14

26

31

Page 5: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

34%47%

55%41% 44% 45%

64%50% 50% 51%

59%

87%78% 79%

97%106%

62%50%

0

50

100

150

200

VA OR MN LA MO OK IL FL MD IN TX MA NY PA WA AL Avg

29

69 71 72 77 79 80 87 88 90103

127 136 139 141155

96

GEN 1 T2W Grantees’ Stats

5

T2W Grantee Enrollments

% of Goal

Sh

ou

ld B

e

Page 6: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

Grantees’ Stats

6

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

AL WA MA PA NY IL VA MN TX OR IN MD FL OK MO LA

05

19

36 3945

56 59

7277

85 87 88

96 98103

Needed

Page 7: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

Grantees’ Stats

7

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

AL WA MA PA NY IL VA MN TX OR IN MD FL OK MO LA

0.0 0.41.4

2.6 2.8 3.24.0 4.2

5.1 5.5 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.9 7.0 7.47

0

11

0

8

0 0

89

56

4

13

11

0 0

Need Per Month Dec Enrolled

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

AL WA MA PA NY IL VA MN TX OR IN MD FL OK MO LA

0.0 0.41.4

2.6 2.8 3.24.0 4.2

5.1 5.56.1 6.2 6.3

6.9 7.0 7.4

10.0

6.3

9.7 9.7

7.7

4.74.0

6.3

8.7

6.0 6.0

8.0

11.7 11.3

4.0

0.0

Need Per Month 3 Month Avg

Page 8: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

Grantees’ Stats

8

Job Placements

Remember: Not a DOL Goal

Close Correlation to the DOL EER

Goal

Does Not Count Work Release

Jobs Clients Were In at

Enrollment

Page 9: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

LA VA MD MA MN MO FL IN IL OR TX OK WA PA NY AL

7%

41%

16%22%

41% 39%34% 36%

51%

62%

45%

62%

41%

50%

57%52%

Grantees’ Stats

9

Initial Job Placements

Placements as % of Enrollments

0

20

40

60

80

100

LA VA MD MA MN MO FL IN IL OR TX OK WA PA NY AL

512 14

28 29 30 30 3241 43 46 49

5869

78 81

Page 10: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

Grantees’ Stats

10

Exiting the Program

Program Exits:

• 90 days without a core service

• Completed program services and working

• Counted in EER 1st Q After the exit month

Other Exits: Unable to work due to:

• Health/Medical Reasons /Deceased / Family

Care Reasons / Moved from service area due to

mandated program

Page 11: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

11

Grantees’ Stats

0

20

40

60

80

100

2 511 11 15 18 23 26 30 35 36

5362 65

71

93

35

Total Exits

Page 12: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

Grantees’ Stats

12

Entered Employment Rate

% of participants who are

employed in the 1st quarter after

the exit quarter.

The goal is 60%.

Work Release Jobs do not

automatically count as a job

placements or for EER.

Page 13: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

Grantees’ Stats

13

Entered Employment Rate

For a WRP job to count, at

release participant must:

Achieve a wage increase; or

Change from P/T to F/T status; or

Have the addition of health and/or

retirement benefits.

Page 14: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 0% 0%

33%37%

41%

50%

61%

69% 70%

91%95% 98%100%100%100%

60%

Grantees’ Stats

14

EER – Goal 60%

EER Den 12 0 0 6 19 27 2 104 16 74 32 60 87 7 19 16

Page 15: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

Exit Grantees’ Stats

15* Program Exit equals total exits minus other exits

Grantee Dec. Pro. Exits *

Dec. EER Den.

Sep. Pro Exits

Diff. Sep /Dec

% Off

AL 2 0 0 0 0%FL 26 19 10 9 47%IL 17 16 13 3 19%IN 16 16 12 4 25%LA 35 2 49 -47 -2350%MA 62 87 56 31 36%MD 11 7 11 -4 -57%MN 35 19 14 5 26%MO 30 27 3 24 89%NY 66 74 46 28 38%OK 14 12 10 2 17%OR 11 0 0 0 0%PA 52 60 37 23 38%TX 46 32 24 8 25%VA 5 6 5 1 17%WA 93 104 77 27 26%

Page 16: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

Grantees’ Stats

16

Employment Retention Rate

Exited clients who are employed

in the 1st quarter after exit.

% of above who are employed in

both the 2nd and 3rd quarters

The goal for this measure is

70%.

Little early for meaningful data.

Page 17: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

50%

62%67%

75%

100%100%100%

70%

Grantees’ Stats

17

ERR – 70%

ERR Den 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 21 6 4 32 1 11

Page 18: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

Grantees’ Stats

18

Employment Retention Rate

Exited clients who are counted

in December had to be exited in

by March.

April starts 1st Q

July starts 2nd Q

Oct starts 3rd Q

Page 19: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

19

Grantees Stats

Employment Retention RateGrantee March Exits Dec ERR Den

AL 0 0FL 0 0IL 0 0IN 0 6LA 13 0MA 0 32MD 0 0MN 2 1MO 0 0NY 9 21OK 0 0OR 0 0PA 0 11TX 4 4VA 0 0WA 26 4

Page 20: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

Grantees’ Stats

20

Average Earnings

Count of the earning of clients

successful in the ERR.

The goal is $9360 ($9/hour if

working full time and just under

200% of the poverty rate for a

family of 1)

Too soon for meaningful data.

Page 21: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

Grantees’ Stats

21

Average Earnings

Page 22: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

Grantee Avg Earn. ERR Num ERR DenLA $0 0 0

TX $15,427 3 4

PA $0 11 11

MO $0 1 0

MN $0 1 1

OK $0 0 0

MD $0 0 0

NY $12,500 13 21

FL $0 0 0

VA $0 0 0

WA $0 2 4

IL $0 0 0

OR $0 0 0

MA $0 32 32

AL $0 0 0

IN $0 4 6

Grantees’ Stats

22

Average Earnings

Page 23: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

Grantees’ Stats

23

Industry-Recognized

Certificate/Degree Rate:

This measure is two-fold:

The participation rate - 75% of all

enrollees in a certificate / degree

program.

The attainment rate - The goal for

this measure is 60% get a

certificate or degree.

Must be an unduplicated count!

Page 24: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

Grantees’ Stats

24

Industry-Rec. Cert./Degree Rate:

Did you know?All training is to start while participant is in

the WRP;

All certifications must be obtained within 3

Qs of exit and before grant ends;

Goal is for meaningful educational and

occupational skills training – OSHA/CPR/

Work Readiness and other soft skill training

are not activities that are counted for this

goal.

Page 25: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0%

11%

31%35%

38%

46%

55% 56% 58% 59%64%

67%70% 71%

100%100%

75%

Grantees’ Stats

25

Participation Rate

Page 26: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0%

44%

56%

40%

94%

70%

91%

84%

71%

100%

81%

60%

84%

92%98%

81%

60%

Grantees’ Stats

26

Attainment Rate

Page 27: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0%

11%

31%35%

38%

46%

55% 56% 58% 59%64%

67%70% 71%

100% 100%

75%

0%

44%

56%

40%

94%

70%

91%

84%

71%

100%

81%

60%

84%

92%98%

81%

60%

% In Cred. Pro.

% Cred. Award.

Grantees’ Stats

27

Combined Rates

Page 28: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

Grantees’ Stats

28

Certificate/Degree Rate:

Grantee EnrolledIn Voc/Occ Tng

ServicesUndup in

Voc/Occ Tng % DiffLA 72 6 0 600%

OK 79 11 7 57%

MD 88 18 27 -33%

MN 71 19 22 -14%

IN 90 48 32 50%

NY 136 87 53 64%

MA 127 72 51 41%

TX 103 57 58 -2%

MO 77 39 38 3%

VA 29 44 17 159%

WA 141 80 85 -6%

PA 139 77 92 -16%

FL 87 65 51 27%

OR 69 36 49 -27%

IL 80 83 80 4%

AL 155 154 126 22%

Page 29: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

Grantees’ Stats

29

Recidivism Rate

% of participants who were re-

arrested for a new crime or re-

incarcerated for revocation of the

parole or probation within 1 year

of their release.

The goal for this measure is 22%

or below.

No one should be in count yet!

Page 30: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

Grantees’ Stats

30

Recidivism Rate

MIS Instructions

E.5.a.

Total Number At

/Beyond 1 Year

From Release

Date

In the “Report Period” column, enter the number of

adult participants who, during the time period covered

by the report, reached their one year anniversary date of

release from prison. The Cumulative column will be

automatically calculated

E.5.b.

From E.5.a. Total

# Ex-Off.

Rearr./Reincar.

Within 1 Year of

Release

In the “Report Period” column, from the number

reported in E.5.a.., enter the number of adult

participants who, during the time period covered by the

report:

Were rearrested for a new crime or

Had Parole / Probation revoked and were

incarcerated.

The Cumulative column will be automatically

calculated.

Page 31: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

Grantees’ Stats

31

Recidivism Rate

GranteeDec. Recid.

Den Nov Enr. TotLA 0 0TX 0 0PA 3 11MO 0 0MN 0 0OK 0 0MD 0 0NY 0 7FL 0 0VA 1 0WA 0 24IL 0 0OR 0 0MA 0 0AL 0 6IN 6 0Total 10 48

Page 32: T2W Performance Review - WorkforceGPS

Help!!

MIS TA Help: Jim [email protected] or 410 707-9346

Hey, contact

us if you

need help –

email is the

best way.