Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
TO DOWNLOAD A COPY OF THIS POSTER, VISIT WWW.WATERS.COM/POSTERS ©2015 Waters Corporation
TARGETED AND UNTARGETED LIPIDOMICS USING AN INTEGRATED MICROFLUIDICS MASS SPECTROMETRY TECHNOLOGY Steven Lai; Paul Rainville; Angela Doneanu; Jay Johnson; James Murphy; Robert Plumb; Giuseppe Astarita
Waters Corporation, Milford, MA
Untargeted data were processed and analyzed using Progenesis QI in-
formatics, which allowed peak picking, multivariate statistical analy-
METHODS
A microfluidic-MS device was optimized for MS analysis of lipids in
complex biological extracts. The integrated microfluidic device was
fabricated from resistant ceramic materials that permit operation at
high pressure with sub 2 µm particles, leading to highly efficient LC
separations of lipid molecules. Lipids were separated using 150 µm ID
x 100 mm devices packed with reversed phase C18, 1.7 µm particles
at flow rates of 3 µl/min. Analyses were performed using both TOF
and TQ operated in both negative and positive ES modes. Ion mobility
was integrated in the TOF platform to provide collision cross section
measurements for lipids for lipid identification.
References
1. Targeted Lipidomics Using the ionKey/MS System” Waters App
note. 2014. 720004968EN.
2. Broccardo et al., Multiplexed Analysis of Steroid Hormones
Using ionKey/MS “ Waters App note. 2014. 720004956en.
3. Astarita G, et al., “A protective lipidomic biosignature
associated with a balanced omega-6/omega-3 ratio in fat-1 transgenic mice” PlosOne April 2014
4. Isaac G, McDonald S, and Astarita G. “Lipid Separation using UPLC with Charged Surface Hybrid Technology”. Waters App
note. 2011. 720004107en.
INTRODUCTION
Lipidomics - the screening of lipid species in biological samples - aims to
offer a better understating of health and disease. The need for a fast,
comprehensive and sensitive analysis of hundreds of lipid species
challenges both the chromatographic separation and mass spectrometry.
Here we used a novel microfluidics platform, which integrates the UPLC
separation into the source of the mass spectrometer. The platform
contains the fluidic connections, electronics, ESI interface, heater, and 1.7
um particles. Such integrated platforms are suitable for lipidomics
analyses with performance comparable to analytical scale LC-MS
analysis.
UNTARGETED LIPIDOMICS
OVERVIEW
A fast and robust microfluidics platform for lipidomics analyses with
considerable reduction in solvent consumption and increase in sensi-
tivity.
TARGETED LIPIDOMICS
Increase in sensitivity using the ionKey / Ion Mobility MS Sytem [1,2,4].
Representative extracted ion chromatograms of isobaric glycerophospholip-ids in mouse plasma. Samples were analyzed using ionKey MS system with
150µm device .
UPLC-like Separation of Isomeric phospholipid and sphingolipid species.
Microfluidics electrospray increases sampling efficiency.
Lipid Class No. MRMs Cone Voltage Collision Energy
PE 45 26 18
Lyso PE 18 26 18
PC 44 42 26
Lyso PC 19 42 26
Ceramide 19 20 30
Sphingomyelin 20 36 24
HexosylCeramide 19 20 26
LactosylCeramide 16 20 30
Cholesteryl Ester 15 36 24
MRM transitions for over 200 lipid species analyzed
Targeted lipidomics analysis were conducted using internal stan-
dards and TargetLynx for the identification and quantification of se-lected lipid molecules.
CONCLUSIONS
The ionKey/MS system leads to highly efficient LC separation of lipid molecules extracted from biological samples. Chromatographic results were equivalent to using analytical-scale columns [1-4], bringing considerable advantages: >200x decrease in solvent consumption, making it convenient for the arge-scale analysis and screenings of hundreds or thousands samples. >10x increase in sensitivity, which could facilitate the detection of low
abundance metabolites. low volumes injection (e.g., 0.2 µl), which makes it ideal when sample
limited studies or when multiple injections are required. The information obtained can be integrated with clinical data to
generate testable hypotheses on the functional significance of the lipid abnormalities observed in brains from subjects with Alzheimer’s disease.
Advantages of microfluidics compared to nanofluidics.
Easy method transfer from 2.1mmID to a 150um column ID method.
Analysis of a selected phosphatidylcholine molecule (PC 14:0/14:0) using ei-
ther the ionKey-MS systemor a regular ACQUITY UPLC system coupled with a Synapt G2-S HDMS operated in MSE mode. Volume injected was the same on
both systems (i.e., 0.2 µl).
Linearity of response and dynamic range of detection of
Pe
ak
Are
a
PC
34:0
PC
36:6
PC
36:5
PC
36:4
PC
36:3
PC
36:2
PC
36:1
PC
38:7
PC
38:6
PC
38:5
SM
d18:1
/16:0
SM
d18:1
/18:0
SM
d18:1
/20:0
SM
d18:1
/24:1
SM
d18:1
/26:1
SM
d18:1
/26:0
SM
d18:1
/24:0
SM
d18:1
/22:0
SM
d18:1
/22:1
HexC
er
d18:1
/h24:1
HexC
er
d18:1
/h24:0
HexC
er
d18:1
/26:1
HexC
er
d18:1
/26:0
HexC
er
d18:1
/24:1
HexC
er
d18:1
/24:0
HexC
er
d18:1
/18:
HexC
er
d18:1
/h18:0
HexC
er
d18:1
/20:0
HexC
er
d18:1
/22:1
HexC
er
d18:1
/h24:1
HexC
er
d18:1
/h22:0
Cer
d18:1
/16:0
Cer
d18:1
/18:0
Cer
d18:0
/18:0
Cer
d18:1
/20:0
Cer
d18:1
/22:0
Cer
d18:0
/22:0
Cer
d18:1
/24:1
PE
p 4
0:4
PE
40:5
PE
40:3
PE
40:6
PE
40:7
LP
E 1
8:0
PE
38:6
PE
38:5
PE
38:4
PE
p38 :
4
PE
p38:5
PE
p 3
6:4
PE
36:5
PE
36:4
1 0 2
1 0 3
1 0 4
1 0 5
1 0 6
1 0 7
C o n c e n tra t io n (p m o l)
Pe
ak
A
re
a
0 2 4 6 8
0
1 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 0 0 0 0 0 0
R2 = 0 .9 9 8 0
P C (1 8 :0 /2 0 :4 )