Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
TargetingtheMicroenvironmentinAdvancedColorectalCancer1
2
DanieleV.F.Tauriello1andEduardBatlle1,23
4
1.InstituteforResearchinBiomedicine(IRBBarcelona).TheBarcelonaInstituteofScience5
andTechnology.BaldiriiReixac10,08028Barcelona,Spain6
2.InstitucióCatalanadeRecercaiEstudisAvançats(ICREA),Barcelona,Spain.7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Correspondence:[email protected]&[email protected]
18
19
20
Keywords:stroma,cancerecology,molecularsubtypes,pre-clinicalmousemodels,21
immuneoncology,TGF-β22
23
2
Abstract1
Colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis often occurs at late stages when tumour cells have2
alreadydisseminated.Current therapiesarepoorlyeffective formetastaticdisease, themain3
causeofdeathinCRC.Despitemountingevidenceimplicatingthetumourmicroenvironmentin4
CRCprogressionandmetastasis,clinicalpracticeremainspredominantlyfocussedontargeting5
the epithelial compartment. As CRCs remain largely refractory to current therapies, we are6
compelled to devise alternative strategies. TGF-β has emerged as a key architect of the7
microenvironment in poor prognosis cancers. Disseminated tumour cells show a strong8
dependencyonaTGF-β-activatedstromaduringtheestablishmentandsubsequentexpansion9
of metastasis. Here, we will review and discuss the development of integrated approaches10
focusedontargetingtheecosystemofpoorprognosisCRCs.11
12
Trends13
• In the search for new paradigms on which to base novel therapeutic strategies for14
advancedCRC,focushasincreasinglybeencentredonthetumourmicroenvironment.15
• Thereisanemergingnotionthatinteractionsbetweenepithelialcancercellsandtheir16
environmentcanbeunderstoodapplyingaconceptualframeworksimilartothatused17
tostudyecosystems.18
• In CRC patients, a stromal-expressed gene programme enriched for TGF-β and19
downstreamtargetshasbeenlinkedtopoorprognosisandmetastasisformation.20
• TGF-β signalling plays key roles in instructing the tumour microenvironment of late21
stageCRCs,yetinhibitionofTGF-βsignallingasatherapeuticstrategyremainsscarcely22
exploredintheclinic.23
3
Thetumourepitheliumasprimarytargetofstandardtherapies1
Colorectal cancer (CRC) originates from benign lesions known as adenomas: localised2
glandularovergrowths in theepithelial liningof the largebowel.Over time, someadenomas3
accumulate mutations in signalling pathways critical to stem cell maintenance, cellular4
proliferation,andtumoursuppression [1,2]andtheycanevolve into invasiveCRCs thatmay5
ultimatelyspreadtodistantorgans.Thisprocesscalledmetastasis(seeBox1)occursinabout6
40-50%ofpatientsandconfersalowprobabilityofsurvival.7
In the clinic, patients are classified in 4 stages (see Glossary). Treatment involves8
aggressive surgical resection of the primary tumour,which cures a large proportion of early9
stagepatients.However, somestage II andmanystage IIIpatientswill relapse, frequently in10
theformofmetastasis,asaconsequenceoftumourcellsthatdisseminatedbeforeresection.11
Unliketheprimarytumour,metastasesarelessfrequentlyremovedbysurgeryunlesslimitedin12
number and extent [3]. Therefore patients that present with metastases at the time of13
diagnosis (stage IV)andthoseatperceivedriskof relapsereceivecytotoxicchemotherapy: in14
most cases a combination of folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin or ironotecan. This15
strategyaimstokillhighlyproliferativecancercellsandhasbeenastapleinthetreatmentof16
solidcancersfordecades[4].AlthoughadjuvantchemotherapyisbeneficialtostageIIIpatients17
and has modest potential for improved survival in stage II [5, 6], it performs poorly in the18
metastaticsetting,almostinvariablygivingrisetodrugresistanceanddiseaseprogression.19
In second-line treatment, chemotherapy is increasingly combinedwith targeted therapy,20
designed to intervene with specific signalling pathways or cellular mechanisms [4]. A key21
exampleinCRCistheuseofantibodiestargetingtheepidermalgrowthfactor(EGF)receptor,22
4
oftenexploitedbycancercells to stimulateproliferation.Apart fromeventual resistance, the1
mainproblemwithtargetedtherapies isthevariableresponses inpatients,requiringabetter2
griponpredictivebiomarkers[7].Forinstance,mutationsthatactivatetheMAPK/ERKpathway3
downstream of EGFR, such as those frequently occurring in the KRAS andNRAS GTPases or4
BRAF,canrenderanti-EGFRtherapyineffective[8].5
A better understanding of advanced cancer may lead to more effective therapies for6
metastaticCRC,butisalsohighlyrelevanttoimprovethemanagementofearlierstagesofthe7
disease.ArguablythemostimportantquestionforstageI-IIIpatientsiswhetherornottotreat8
at all andwhich therapeutic strategywill bebeneficial toprevent recurrence.Assessmentof9
probability of relapse after therapy on the individual level remains a major challenge [9].10
Anatomicalandhistopathologicalfeaturesofthetumoursuchasextentofinvasion(T),number11
of lymph node metastases (N), bowel perforation or obstruction, the presence of12
lymphovascularinvasion,andapoorlydifferentiatedhistologyareusedtoidentifyCRCpatients13
atriskofrecurrence.However, theseparametersonlyholdamoderatepredictivepowerand14
donothelpselectoptimaltreatmentoptions.Furthermore,withtheexceptionofchromosomal15
or microsatellite instability (MSI) [10, 11] and mutations in the BRAF oncogene [12], no16
molecularfeatureisrobustlyassociatedwithprognosisandthereforeusedroutinelyinclinical17
practice[9,13].18
19
20
5
TranscriptomicsredefiningCRCclassification1
Toimprovepatientstratificationandidentifypotentialmoleculartargetsfortherapy,the2
field has generated large collections of transcriptomic datasets from tumour samples,which3
have enabled the identification of CRC subtypes based on distinctive global gene expression4
profiles[14-19]. Inanattempttoconsolidatethesedata,arecentmeta-analysisdividedCRCs5
into4definedconsensusmolecular subtypes (CMS), representinganMSI-like class (CMS1), a6
canonical WNT/MYC class (CMS2), a metabolically dysregulated class (CMS3), and a7
mesenchymalclass(CMS4)[20].Thelattersubtype,towhichabout1inevery4CRCsbelongs,is8
ofparticularinterestasitrelapseswithhigherfrequencythantheothers.9
Theelevatedexpressionofmesenchymalgenesinanepithelialcancerledtotheproposal10
that epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) characterizes poor prognosis in CRC [21].11
However,thetranscriptomeofatumoursamplenotonlyreflectstheexpressionprogrammeof12
epithelial cancer cells but also the profile of mesenchymal cells present in the tumour13
microenvironment(TME).Indeed,ourgroupandthegroupofEnzoMedicorecentlydiscovered14
thatexpressionofmesenchymalgenesintranscriptomicCRCdataislargelycontributedbycells15
oftheTME,mainlybycancer-associatedfibroblasts(CAFs),ratherthanbycancercells[22,23].16
In agreement with these observations, CMS4 cancers show a higher degree of stromal17
infiltration than the other subtypes [20]. Furthermore, our analyses indicate that a large18
proportionof theseCAF-expressed genes are strongly associated to cancer relapse andpoor19
prognosisinCRCcohorts[22,23].Ofnote,thefactthattheexpressionofmesenchymalgenes,20
includingmanyEMTmasterregulatorssuchSNAI1,TWISTandZEB1,iscontributedbystromal21
6
cellsintranscriptomicprofilesdoesnotruleoutthepossibilitythatsubsetsoftumourcellsmay1
undergoEMT,particularlyatinvasionfronts.2
3
TreatingCancerasanEcosystem4
Focussing on the tumour stroma is not novel. At the end of the 19th century, English5
physician Stephen Paget – observing preferential patterns of metastatic dissemination to6
particularorgans–proposedthe‘seedandsoil’hypothesistoexplainthisphenomenonasthe7
combinationof the colonizing cancer cells’ adaptability anda congenialmicroenvironment in8
thedistantorgan[24].HesuggesteditwouldbeusefultostudythepropertiesoftheTME,as9
wellasitscrosstalkwithcancercells.Indeed,theroleoftheTMEbothattheoriginalsiteandin10
thedistantorganhasbecomeatopicofintenseinvestigationinrecentdecades[25].Similarto11
howintestinalcryptstemcellsareregulatedbyaspecializedstemcellmicroenvironmentcalled12
aniche,theTMEcanfostercancerstemcellsandthusdriverecurrenceandmetastasis(Box1)13
[26,27],aswellasprovidemechanismsfordrugresistance[28,29].Itisnowacceptedthatthe14
TMEisanactiveplayerintumourmalignizationandthatitprovidesafertilegroundtodelvefor15
therapeutictargets[30,31].16
The study of complex interactions between cancer cells and their environment inspires17
parallelswiththe interrelationshipsrecognized inanecosystem.Theapplicationofecological18
conceptstooncologymayhelpexplainwhyarigidfocusonepithelialcancercellsalonehasled19
toahighnumberoffailednewdrugsandclinicalstrategies.Justasecologyistheframeworkof20
choice for understanding themechanisms of organismal evolution through natural selection,21
ecologyworking on the level of cellular populations serves to clarify the dynamics of cancer22
evolution. This includes natural selection due to limited resources as well as the artificial23
7
selectionofsubclonesresistanttotherapy.Hence,thefitnessofacellularpopulation(orofa1
setof cancermutations) shouldbeconsidered in thecontextof its localenvironment,which2
consistsofcellular interactions,physicalparameters(oxygenlevels,pH,mechanicalpressure),3
andmoleculeslikeextracellularmatrixcomponents,growthfactorsandcytokines.4
Moreover,ecologicaltypesofinteractioncandescribevariouslevelsofcrosstalkintumour5
dynamics. Examples of competitive and cooperative interactions have been reported both6
betweendifferentepithelialsubclonesandbetweenepithelialcancercellsandthestroma[32-7
34].Additionally,theimmunesystemcanbeconvertedfromapredatortoanaccomplice(see8
Box2).Indeed,thestromalenvironmentisnotstaticandco-evolutionisacompellingconcept:9
parallel evolution of neoplastic epithelial cancer cells and cells in the microenvironment,10
subject to epigenetic and gene expression changes [35]. Furthermore, the stromal11
compartment contributes significantly to intratumoral heterogeneity, with important12
implications for disease progression and therapeutic responses [36]. Thus, cancer ecology13
integrates complex interactions between epithelial cancer cell populations and their14
environmenttopromiseadeeperunderstandingofthebiologyofcancer[37,38].15
16
ModulatingtheCRCecosystemfortherapeuticpurposes17
The compositionof the TMEduring colorectal tumorigenesis and in advanced cancers is18
subject to intensifying inquiry (for a recent overview see refs: [39, 40]) and is found to be19
different from normal intestinal stroma (see Figure 1, Key Figure). As recently reported, the20
majorityofgenesthatpredictcancerrecurrenceinCRCpatientsareexpressedinCAFsandnot21
bythecancercells[22,41].ThestrikingprognosticpoweroftheTMEraisestheopportunityto22
moreaccuratelyestimate the riskof relapseofanygiven stage I-IIIpatient. It alsopaves the23
8
wayforthedevelopmentofadditionallyrefinedmolecularclassificationsbasedonthecontents1
of the ecosystem. A relevant early example of such an ecological classification of CRC was2
establishedbyGalonandothers[42-44],whoobservedthatinfiltrationofparticularsubsetsof3
Tcellsinthetumourmasspredictslongerdiseasefreesurvivalintervalsaftertherapy.4
Moreover,novelCRCclassificationsbasedonthetypeandfeaturesofstromalcellswillbe5
key to stratifypatients for treatments that target theTME.Basedon the idea thatCRC cells6
dependonparticularstromalfactorstoeffectivelydisseminate,therapeuticsthatmodulatethe7
CRCecosystemmaybeeffectiveintreatingorpreventingmetastasis.Anadditionaladvantage8
of targeting the TME is its genetic stability, making drug resistance less likely to occur.9
Furthermore,thecommonalityofmostelementsinthestromaacrosscancertypessuggestsa10
broadapplicabilityofeffective therapies.Ahandfulof therapiesbasedon theaboveconcept11
have already been developed and are currently being applied. For instance, blood vessel12
formation and endothelial cells have been successfully targeted by anti-angiogenic therapy13
[45]. Indeed, a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF, i.e.14
bevacizumab) inhibits angiogenesis and has been shown to improve survival for stage IV15
patients[46,47].Additionally,metronomicchemotherapy–aimingtoforestalldrugresistance16
and suppress neo-angiogenesis – has shown promise for prolonging survival and limiting17
metastasisinpreclinicalmodels,andisbeingtestedinclinicaltrials[48,49].18
AnotherprimeexampleoftherapydirectedtotheTMEis immunotherapy(Box2). Ithas19
beenproposedthatseveral(chemo-)therapiesthatdonotdirectlytargetimmunity,suchas5-20
fluorouracil and platinum compounds, in fact do rely on immune components. These21
9
conventional treatments are effective at least in part by reinforcing tumour1
immunosurveillance,especiallywhentheyinduceimmunogeniccancercelldeath[50].2
3
TGF-βasamainorganizerofthemetastaticCRCecosystem4
TGF-β has a dual role in CRC, with tumour suppressive functions in early stages and5
promotingdiseaseprogressioninadvanceddisease(seeBox3).Ourgroupdemonstratedthat6
elevatedTGF-βsignallingintheTMElinkstopoorprognosisinCRC[22,41].ThestromalTGF-β7
responseencodesageneprogrammethatincludesaplethoraofcytokines,growthfactorsand8
extracellularmatrixproteins,manyofwhichhavebeenshowntoplaykeyrolesduringdisease9
progressionandmetastasisinseveralcancertypes.Amongthesepotentialtherapeutictargets10
is interleukin-11(IL-11),acytokinesecretedbyTGF-β-stimulatedfibroblasts that inducespro-11
survival response inCRCcellsduringcancerprogressionandmetastatic colonization [41,51].12
The picture that emerges is that key functions required to complete the formation of13
metastasisareprovidedbytheTGF-β-activatedmicroenvironment(Figure1).14
Because disseminated tumour cells thrive on a TGF-β-activated environment, this15
dependencycouldbeexploitedintheclinicalsettingtoimprovepatienttreatment;ourgroup16
showedforthefirsttimethatpharmacologicalinhibitionofstromalTGF-βsignallingiseffective17
in blocking metastatic colonization in mice [22, 41]. Besides activating a pro-metastatic18
programme in CAFs [52], stromal TGF-β signalling induces a pro-tumorigenic phenotype in19
neutrophils and macrophages [53-55]. In addition, TGF-β directly suppresses the anticancer20
response of the adaptive immune system, including the deregulation of cytotoxic T21
lymphocytes [56-58].Also,neutralizingtheTGF-βpathway inTcells ledto immune-mediated22
10
eradicationoftumoursinamodelofmelanoma[59].ThatthedualroleofTGF-βsignallingin1
instructing immune cells and CAFs might be more related than is immediately obvious, is2
suggestedbyreportinwhichCAFswereshowntohaveimmunesuppressiveeffects[60,61].3
Thus, it will be interesting to assess the efficacy of pharmacological intervention in this4
pathwayon theCRC ecosystem. Several therapeutic strategies targeting TGF-β are in clinical5
development (see Box 4) [62-64]. This spurs the hope that if we can block TGF-β6
pharmacologically, we may prevent a vicious cycle of stroma activation, expression of pro-7
tumorigenic secreted factors, and the generation of an immunosuppressive environment8
(Figure 1). Indeed, TGF-β inhibition may work as (or synergize with other types of)9
immunotherapy(Box2).10
11
CaveatsaboutthedualroleofTGF-βsignallinginCRC12
DuetothetumoursuppressivefunctionofTGF-βsignallinginepithelialcomponentofCRC13
(see Box 3), elevated TGF-β levels necessary to instruct the poor prognosis-associated14
microenvironmentmightnotbecompatiblewithtumourgrowth.Wespeculatethatthelossof15
TGF-βresponseintheepithelialcomponentofthecancermayfacilitatetheelevationofTGF-β16
levels during tumour progression. A functional link between these two events has been17
observedinexperimentalmodels[65].InabiobankofCRCorganoids,independenceofTGF-β-18
mediatedgrowthinhibitionwasassociatedwithadvancedstagesofthedisease[66],whereas19
lossofSMAD4inepithelialCRCcellscorrelatedwithpoorprognosisinseveralstudies[67,68].20
Yet,abrogationofthecytostaticTGF-βresponseinCRCcellsisnotexclusivelyexplainedbyloss-21
of-function mutation in pathway components suggesting additional mechanisms of TGF-β22
11
resistance [66]. Also, a proportion of TGF-β-reactive CRCs may respond to the cytokine by1
undergoing EMT while bypassing the cytostatic effect. Apparently, this effect is relevant to2
trigger invasionofaparticular subsetofearly lesionsnamedsessile serratedadenomas [69],3
whichmightthereforebenefitfromanti-TGF-βtherapy.Conversely,itremainsunclearwhether4
anti-TGF-β therapy would be safe for patients with cancer cells that have an intact TGF-β5
pathway–eveniftheyrepresentasubclone–andarekeptincheckbyitscytostaticeffects.6
Although the TGF-βpathwayhas emerged as a powerful architect of thepro-metastatic7
poorprognosisTME, itseffecton individualstromalcell types ispleiotropicand incompletely8
charted. Accordingly, we propose that, to treat the cancer ecosystemwithmore integrated9
approaches, we need to study and understand its complexity in greater detail. As such,10
manipulatingamasterregulatorlikeTGF-βinsufficientlycomplexmodelsystemsofmetastatic11
CRCshouldnotonlyprovidetheneededrationaleforclinicaltranslation,butwouldadditionally12
giveusrelevantparameterstohelpmapthecrosstalkinthecancerecosystem.13
14
Needforbetterpreclinicalmodelsmovingforward15
To study the efficacy of above-mentioned and other stroma-directed therapies in the16
preclinicalsetting,thereisademandformorecomprehensive,predictivemodels.Althoughthe17
fieldhasmovedfromsubcutaneously injecting2D-culturedhumanCRCcell linestoexploiting18
3Dorganoidcultureandpatient-derivedxenografts(PDX)–approachesthatpromisetoretain19
tumour heterogeneity in genetics, architecture and drug responses [70-72] – these in vivo20
models lack an intact TME. This is due to a mismatch between some murine and human21
signallingmoleculesandbecauseoftheabsentorabrogatedimmunesystemrequiredforthe22
12
engraftment of human tumour tissue in murine hosts. To address these problems, mouse1
modelsarebeinggeneratedthatcorrectknownsignallingdeficitsaswellasfeaturehumanized2
immune system components, potentially leading to patient-specific immune environments.3
Theseadvancespromisetostronglyenhancecurrentmodelsforcancerbiologyandpreclinical,4
personalizedoncology.5
Analternativeapproach to study theCRCTMEandcancer immunity involvesgenetically6
modified mouse models (GEMMs), which feature an intact, immunocompetent TME yet7
typicallyfailtocaptureadvancedCRC.Thisleavesagap:totestcurrentideasanddiscoverand8
develop novel therapeutic strategies we are in need of CRC models that are humanlike in9
molecular characteristics, genetics and histopathology, and that are metastatic in a fully10
immunocompetentenvironment.Theidealscenariowouldincludeatransplantable(organoid)11
system in the commonlyusedC57BL/6 strain, so that it canbe leveragedacross awealthof12
existinggeneticmodelstodissectspecificfunctionsofstromalpathways.Furthermore,sucha13
systemwouldbecriticaltotestingnoveltherapiesthattargetthetumourecosystem.14
15
Concludingremarks16
The CRC oncology field has evolved in the past decades. From histological analyses to17
molecularsubtyping,fromcytotoxicchemotherapytopersonalizedcombinationswithtargeted18
therapy.Whathasnotchanged,unfortunately,isthatbesidessurgerythereisverylittlewecan19
dotoimproveoverallsurvivalforadvanceddisease.20
However, the paradigm shift that points to the TME as a critical factor in determining21
metastatic success opens the door to a more integrated understanding of the biology of22
13
metastasis. One that invites us to consider cancer as a complex ecosystem rather than as a1
tenacious weed. In this context, therapeutic targeting of stromal TGF-signalling might be2
expectedtoreprogrammethepoorprognosiscancerecosystem(Figure1),withthepotential3
to make metastatic lesions unsustainable or to prevent metastatic initiation altogether.We4
hopethatthisemergingconceptwillfindatimelytranslationtotheclinic.Acknowledgingthe5
many challenges ahead (see also Outstanding Questions), we need more sophisticated and6
predictive CRC models to show proof-of-principle results that may catalyse the effort of7
targetingtheTME.8
9
OutstandingQuestions10
• WhattriggerstheupregulationofTGF-βinsometumoursbutnotothers?11
• Whatcell type is (orwhichcell typesare) the sourceof secretedandactivatedTGF-β12
thatreprogramstheCRCecosystem?13
• AsnotallCRCshaveknownmutations in theTGF-βpathway,andsometumoursmay14
haveco-existingmutantandsensitivesubclones,towhatextentistheresponsivenessof15
epithelial cells to TGF-β (mainly associated to early disease stages) still relevant in16
advancedCRC?17
• Andwithinthiscontext,isTGF-βtherapysafeforallpatients?18
• Given thedependencyofmetastatic initiationonaTGF-β-activatedTME, is theTGF-β19
therapeuticwindowlimitedtoadjuvanttherapy–toinhibitmetastaticcolonization–or20
couldTGF-βtherapyalsotreatestablishedmetastases,e.g.asimmunotherapy?21
22
14
Box1.CRCmetastasis:biologyandtherapeuticscope1
Initial transformation of the colon epithelium and subsequent transitions through the2
adenoma-carcinoma sequence are thought to require successive genetic alterations in 43
signalling pathways:WNT, EGFR, TGF-β and P53 [1, 2]. In the healthy colonicmucosa, these4
signallingpathwaysregulatethebehaviourofintestinalstemcells(ISCs).Therefore,duringCRC5
progression,tumourcellsbecomeindependentfromthesecryptnichesignals[66].About40%6
of all CRCdisseminate to other organs.Metastasis can either bepresent duringdiagnosis or7
reveal itselfmonthsoryearsaftersurgeryasa recurrence. Inmanycases,distant recurrence8
targets the liver, at least in part because intestinal blood vessels drain into the portal vein,9
whichconnectstotheliver.Metastasisisamultistepprocessthatrequirescellstodetachfrom10
their epithelial neighbours, invade the submucosa, intravasateand survive in thevasculature11
(bloodorlymphaticvessels),extravasateandsurviveinanalienorgan,toeventuallyreinitiatea12
thrivingtumour[73,74].Thereismuchofthebiologyofmetastasisthatwedon’tunderstand,13
butfromwhatweknow,itisaveryharshandinefficientprocess[75,76].Arguably,theprocess14
selectsforthefiercestandmostresilientcancer(stem)cellsanddiscoveringwhatmakesthem15
successfulmightuncovertherapeutictargets.Importantly,themetastaticprocesshasnotbeen16
linked to specific genetic alterationswithin epithelial CRC cells [77]. Therefore, studies have17
shiftedfocusontotheroleoftheTMEandthemechanismbywhichthemetastaticcellexploits18
the TME for survival, immune evasion, and growth stimuli [78, 79]. Perhaps, success in19
metastasisisdefinedaswhocanbestremodeltheirmicroenvironment.20
21
15
Box2.Cancerinflammation,immunityandimmunotherapy1
Inflammation is a well-described risk factor in gastrointestinal tumorigenesis [80], and2
encompassesdisparatesignallingpathwaysbyavarietyofimmunecellsthatimpacteverystep3
of cancer progression andmetastasis [81]. Although the immune system can be a powerful4
tumour suppressor by the coordinated elimination of aberrant cells, tumours find a way to5
surviveinspiteofimmunosurveillance.Thereisevidenceforimmunoselectioninmanycancers,6
includingCRC–wherethenumberofobservedneoantigens(inremainingsubclones) is lower7
thanexpectedbasedonmutationrates–andcancercellscanacquireresistancetoimmunity8
bye.g.abrogatingantigenpresentation[82,83].9
Moreover,ithasbecomeincreasinglyclearthatinflammatorymechanismsintumourscan10
alsohelpdrivecancerprogression[81].Bystudyinghowprogressingcancerssuppresstheanti-11
tumour response and subvert immune regulation to foster immune suppressor cells and12
produce pro-tumorigenic factors that support cancer cells, the expansive field of cancer13
immunology has introduced a multitude of novel therapeutic strategies [84, 85]. On the14
conceptuallevel,manysuchtherapiesaimtoenhanceendogenousanticancerimmunitythatis15
somehowinsufficientordysfunctional[86].Toachievethiseffect,atherapycanreducecellular16
or molecular crosstalk mechanisms of immune suppression and/or increase T cell survival,17
proliferation,infiltration,andactivationintheTME[87].18
The promise of immuno-oncology has recently been demonstrated by long-lasting19
responsestoimmunecheckpointinhibitors.Theseprovedbeneficialinvarioustypesofcancer20
byunleashingTcells thatwerecrippledbysignallingeither from immunesuppressorcellsor21
cancercellshijackinganti-inflammatorymechanisms [88,89]. It is stillunclearwhether these22
16
therapieswillbroadlybenefitCRCpatients.However,onestudyonmismatchrepair-deficient1
(MSI) cancers, includingof the colon,did show therapeutic responses [90]. This supports the2
concept that tumour cells with higher frequency of neoantigens, such as in microsatellite3
instable cancers, are generally more vulnerable to T cell-mediated anti-tumour immunity,4
possiblyexplainingtheirrelativelygoodprognosis[91,92].Ifcurrentimmunotherapiesturnout5
nottohaveabroadapplicabilityassingleagentsinCRC,thereisstillhopethatacombination6
of treatments that both enhances intratumoral immune infiltration aswell as activationwill7
farebetter[93,94].8
9
Box3.Thedual,biphasicroleofTGF-βinCRC10
Thepro-metastaticeffectsofTGF-βsignallingonthetumourmicroenvironmentcanoccur11
independently of signalling in epithelial cancer cells, as many cancers silence the epithelial12
pathwaysoastoprogress.TGF-βsignallingisconsideredatumoursuppressorpathwayincolon13
carcinogenesisbecauseittriggersapotentcytostaticresponseinepithelialcells[22,65,95-97].14
Indeed,about40%ofCRCsdisplay loss-of-functionmutations inTGF-βpathwaycomponents,15
which are acquired around the adenoma carcinoma transition [2, 98]. An early clue for a16
positive role for TGF-β signalling indiseaseprogressionwas foundbyKawataand colleagues17
whoreportedthatserumlevelsofTGF-β1predictrelapseinCRCpatients[99].Later,ourgroup18
showedthatTGFB1,TGFB2andTGFB3mRNAlevelsassociatewithshorterdiseasefreesurvival19
intervalsaftertherapy instageI-IIIpatients[41].ElevatedTGFB1-3expressioncorrelateswith20
upregulationofTGF-βresponsegenesignatures(TBRS)incellsoftheTME,specificallyinTcells,21
macrophages, endothelial cells and most prominently CAFs. These TBRSs hold a striking22
17
predictivepowerforcancerrecurrenceinCRC[41]anddetectionbyimmunohistochemistryof1
severalproteinsupregulatedinTGF-β-activatedCAFsidentifiespatientsathighriskofrelapse2
[22].Furthermore,comparisonofthemolecularsubtypesrevealedthatthemainsignallingaxis3
deregulated in the stromal/mesenchymal subtype (CMS4) is the TGF-β pathway [20]. A4
significant proportion of the genes differentially expressed in CMS4 cancers that predict a5
higherprobabilityofrecurrenceareincludedintheTBRSsandcorrespondtogenesinducedby6
TGF-β in CAFs. The role of a TGF-β-activated ecosystem in disease progression has been7
confirmed in experimentalmodels of advanced CRC, where enforced TGF-β signalling in the8
TMEstronglyincreasesmetastaticburden[41].9
10
Box4.TGF-βtherapeuticsinclinicaldevelopment11
Several methods of targeting the TGF-β pathway have been described. These include12
antisense oligonucleotides to TGF-β ligand mRNA, small molecule inhibitors of the receptor13
kinasedomains,andmonoclonalantibodiesagainstligandsorreceptors.Inaddition,thereare14
vaccines and adoptive cell transfer strategies that target TGF-β signalling as part of their15
mechanism. For anoverviewof all (pre-) clinical strategies, see references [62-64].Here,we16
selectedTGF-βtargetingtherapiesthatarecurrentlyinclinicaltrialsforCRC(TableI).17
18
19
20
18
TableI.TGF-βtargetedtherapiesinclinicaltrialsforCRC1Type Drug MoA Setting(Phase) TrialIdentifierAntisenseoligos Trebedersen
(AP12009 AntisensePharma)
ASO to TGF-β2mRNA
Melanoma,pancreas,CRC(I)
NCT00844064
ReceptorinhibitorsKinaseinhibitors
Galunisertib(LY2157299EliLilly)
TβRI(ALK5)kinaseinhibitor
Rectalcancer(II)Study cancerimmunology in solidtumours(I)Checkpoint inhibitorcombination in solidtumours(I/II)
NCT02688712NTT02304419NCT02423343
TEW-7197,MedPactor
TβRI(ALK5)kinaseinhibitor
Solidtumours(I) NCT02160106
MAbs IMC-TR1(LY3022859EliLilly)
TβRII neutralizingMAb
Solidtumours(I) NCT01646203
PF-03446962(Pfizer)
ALK-1 neutralizingMAb
Metastatic CRC (I)Solidtumours(I)
NCT02116894NCT00557856
ImmunotherapyVaccines FANG vaccine
(Gradalis)shRNA againstfurin*
MetastaticCRC(II)
NCT01505166
TAGvaccine TGF-β2-antisense/GMCSF modifiedautologoustumourcells
Metastatic solidtumours(I)
NCT00684294
MoA:Modeofaction.ASO:antisenseoligo.ALK1:Activinreceptor-likekinase1(non-canonical2TGF-βreceptortype I inendothelialcells).*Aspartof itsMoA,autologoustumourcellscarry3bifunctionalshRNAblockingfurin,leadingtolowerTGF-β1andTGF-β2levels.45
6
7
19
Glossary1
Adjuvantchemotherapy:chemotherapygivenafterprimarytreatment(surgeryinCRC)to2
lowertheriskofthecancercomingback.3
Cancer evolution: the theory that within a tumour, accumulating mutations and/or4
localizedselectivepressureleadstothegenerationofsubclonesthatcompetewitheachother5
forlimitedresources.Furthermore,atthetimeofdiagnosisa(minority)subclonemayalready6
carryamutationthatrendersit(partially)resistanttochemotherapy.Boththisconceptandthe7
realization that this theory helps explain the unique nature of each individual tumourmake8
cancerevolutionahighlyrelevantconceptthatformsthebasisformoreintegrated(ecological)9
therapeuticstrategies.10
CRC staging: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) has established a general11
cancerstagingprotocolcalledtheTNMStagingSystem.Tstandsfortumourandevaluatesthe12
original (primary) tumour in gradesof aggressiveness;N stands for lymphNode involvement13
andqualifiesthepresenceofcancercellsspreadingtonearby lymphnodes.Maddressesthe14
presence or absence of distantmetastasis (spreading of cancer to distant organs). Based on15
these3categories,patientsaregroupedintofourstagesindicatedbyRomannumerals(I,II,III16
and IV).While statistically representing significantly different risk groups for recurrence and17
cancer-relateddeath,thestagingsystemdoesnotaccuratelypredictonthelevelofindividual18
patients.19
Cytokines: large class of small secreted signalling proteins involved in cellular crosstalk,20
especiallyrelevantfortheorchestrationofimmuneresponsesandcancer.21
Ecology: the comprehensive study of the distribution, abundance and dynamics of22
organisms, their interactions with others and with their physical environment. It is most23
frequently applied on the organism level,where populations and their environment forman24
ecosystemandthelargestsuchsystemstudiedistheecosphereearth,yetitcanalsobeapplied25
to cells in a tissue or in a cancer. Central concepts in ecology include cooperation and26
competition,parasitismandpredation,andevolution.27
Immunosurveillance:theprocessbywhichmalignantcellsarekeptincheckbyanticancer28
immunity. Cancer immunity is understood to have an initial elimination phase before the29
20
balance is tipped and tumour cells start escaping from immunosurveillance. Between1
eliminationandescape,theremaybeaprolongedstateofequilibriumbetweencancergrowth2
andimmunity-relatedkilling.3
Relapse/Recurrence:thereturnofatumouraftersurgicalremovaloftheoriginaltumour4
(whichoftenentailedremovalofpartsor thewholeof thecolon).Thetumourcanreappear,5
oftenasadistantmetastasis.6
Metronomicchemotherapy:frequentorcontinuousadministrationoflownon-toxicdoses7
withno interruptions for longperiods toprevent resistanceandtargetbothepithelialcancer8
cellsandthegrowingtumourvasculature.9
MicroenvironmentorStroma:supportiveconnectivetissuewithstructuralandfunctional10
roles both during homeostasis and in disruption such as wounding or disease. The stroma11
includesfibroblasts,bloodandlymphaticvessels,immunecells,andtheextracellularmatrix.In12
thecontextofcancer,thestromaisincreasinglyunderstoodasacomplex,dynamicentitythat13
istransformedbyandco-evolveswithcancercellsandcandrivemalignantprogression.14
Microsatellite instability (MSI): due to a deficiency in DNAmismatch-repair genes,MSI15
patients accumulate spontaneous errors in regions of their genome that are repetitive and16
therebychallengingtoreplicate.17
18
21
Figurelegend1
Figure 1 (Key Figure). The CRC ecosystem and the progression-driving role of TGF-β.2
Besides fibroblasts (CAF), endothelial cells, pericytes and mesenchymal stem cells (MSC),3
colorectal cancers are infiltrated by a variety of innate and adaptive immune cells, including4
lymphocytes (T cells, B cells, natural killer cells), monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells,5
granulocytes (neutrophils, basophils, eosinophils, and mast cells), and myeloid-derived6
suppressorcells(MDSC).7
TGF-β has emerged as a central architect that drivesmalignization of the cancer ecosystem,8
activating stromal cells towards pro-tumorigenic differentiation, inducing the expression of9
secretedfactors,andfacilitatingtheaccumulationofimmunesuppressiveanddrugresistance10
functionalities.Effectiveecological treatmentmight includeacombinationofTGF-β inhibition11
withotherstroma-directedtherapies,suchaschemotherapyandtargeted(immuno-)therapy.12
13
Acknowledgements14
Workintheauthors’labhasbeensupportedbygrantSAF2014-53784_RandaJuandela15
Cierva fellowship (D.V.F.T) from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness16
(MINECO),andbytheDr.JosefSteinerFoundation. IRBBarcelona istherecipientofaSevero17
OchoaAwardofExcellencefromtheMINECO.WewouldliketothankElenaSanchoforcritical18
readingofthismanuscript,aswellastheBatllelabforfruitfuldiscussions.19
20
22
References1
21Fearon,E.R.andVogelstein,B.(1990)Ageneticmodelforcolorectaltumorigenesis.Cell61,3759-76742Fearon,E.R.(2011)Moleculargeneticsofcolorectalcancer.AnnuRevPathol6,479-50753Kopetz,S.,etal. (2009) Improvedsurvival inmetastaticcolorectalcancer isassociatedwith6adoptionofhepaticresectionandimprovedchemotherapy.JClinOncol27,3677-368374VanCutsem,E.,etal.(2014)Metastaticcolorectalcancer:ESMOClinicalPracticeGuidelines8fordiagnosis,treatmentandfollow-up.AnnOncol25Suppl3,iii1-995Gray,R.,etal.(2007)Adjuvantchemotherapyversusobservationinpatientswithcolorectal10cancer:arandomisedstudy.Lancet370,2020-2029116Andre,T.,etal.(2009)Improvedoverallsurvivalwithoxaliplatin,fluorouracil,andleucovorin12asadjuvanttreatmentinstageIIorIIIcoloncancerintheMOSAICtrial.JClinOncol27,3109-133116147Sinicrope,F.A.,etal.(2016)MolecularBiomarkersinthePersonalizedTreatmentofColorectal15Cancer.ClinGastroenterolHepatol14,651-658168Bertotti,A.,etal.(2015)ThegenomiclandscapeofresponsetoEGFRblockadeincolorectal17cancer.Nature526,263-267189Labianca,R.,etal.(2013)Earlycoloncancer:ESMOClinicalPracticeGuidelinesfordiagnosis,19treatmentandfollow-up.AnnOncol24Suppl6,vi64-722010Carethers,J.M.andJung,B.H.(2015)GeneticsandGeneticBiomarkersinSporadicColorectal21Cancer.Gastroenterology149,1177-1190e11732211 Mouradov, D., et al. (2013) Survival in stage II/III colorectal cancer is independently23predictedbychromosomalandmicrosatellite instability,butnotbyspecificdrivermutations.24AmJGastroenterol108,1785-17932512 Samowitz,W.S., et al. (2005) Poor survival associated with the BRAF V600Emutation in26microsatellite-stablecoloncancers.CancerRes65,6063-60692713 Jass, J.R. (2007) Classification of colorectal cancer based on correlation of clinical,28morphologicalandmolecularfeatures.Histopathology50,113-1302914DeSousaEMelo,F.,etal. (2013)Poor-prognosiscoloncancer isdefinedbyamolecularly30distinctsubtypeanddevelopsfromserratedprecursorlesions.NatMed19,614-6183115 Marisa, L., et al. (2013) Gene expression classification of colon cancer into molecular32subtypes:characterization,validation,andprognosticvalue.PLoSMed10,e10014533316 Sadanandam, A., et al. (2013) A colorectal cancer classification system that associates34cellularphenotypeandresponsestotherapy.NatMed19,619-6253517 Roepman, P., et al. (2014) Colorectal cancer intrinsic subtypes predict chemotherapy36benefit,deficientmismatchrepairandepithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Int JCancer134,37552-5623818 Budinska, E., et al. (2013) Gene expression patterns unveil a new level of molecular39heterogeneityincolorectalcancer.JPathol231,63-764019Schlicker,A.,etal.(2012)Subtypesofprimarycolorectaltumorscorrelatewithresponseto41targetedtreatmentincolorectalcelllines.BMCMedGenomics5,6642
23
20Guinney, J.,etal. (2015)Theconsensusmolecularsubtypesofcolorectalcancer.NatMed121,1350-1356221Kalluri,R.andWeinberg,R.A.(2009)Thebasicsofepithelial-mesenchymaltransition.JClin3Invest119,1420-1428422 Calon, A., et al. (2015) Stromal gene expression defines poor-prognosis subtypes in5colorectalcancer.NatGenet47,320-329623 Isella, C., et al. (2015) Stromal contribution to the colorectal cancer transcriptome. Nat7Genet47,312-319824Paget,S.(1889)TheDistributionofSecondaryGrotwhinCanceroftheBreast.Lancet133,9571-5731025 Fidler, I.J. (2003) The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: the 'seed and soil' hypothesis11revisited.NatRevCancer3,453-4581226 Biswas, S., et al. (2015) Microenvironmental control of stem cell fate in intestinal13homeostasisanddisease.JPathol237,135-1451427 Medema, J.P. and Vermeulen, L. (2011) Microenvironmental regulation of stem cells in15intestinalhomeostasisandcancer.Nature474,318-3261628 Tredan, O., et al. (2007) Drug resistance and the solid tumor microenvironment. J Natl17CancerInst99,1441-14541829Klemm,F.andJoyce,J.A.(2015)Microenvironmentalregulationoftherapeuticresponsein19cancer.TrendsCellBiol25,198-2132030 Fang, H. and Declerck, Y.A. (2013) Targeting the tumor microenvironment: from21understandingpathwaystoeffectiveclinicaltrials.CancerRes73,4965-49772231Quail,D.F.andJoyce,J.A. (2013)Microenvironmentalregulationoftumorprogressionand23metastasis.NatMed19,1423-14372432Hanahan,D.andCoussens,L.M.(2012)Accessoriestothecrime:functionsofcellsrecruited25tothetumormicroenvironment.CancerCell21,309-3222633 Marusyk, A., et al. (2014) Non-cell-autonomous driving of tumour growth supports sub-27clonalheterogeneity.Nature514,54-582834Cleary,A.S.,etal.(2014)Tumourcellheterogeneitymaintainedbycooperatingsubclonesin29Wnt-drivenmammarycancers.Nature508,113-1173035 Polyak, K., et al. (2009) Co-evolution of tumor cells and their microenvironment. Trends31Genet25,30-383236 Junttila, M.R. and de Sauvage, F.J. (2013) Influence of tumour micro-environment33heterogeneityontherapeuticresponse.Nature501,346-3543437Merlo,L.M.,etal.(2006)Cancerasanevolutionaryandecologicalprocess.NatRevCancer356,924-9353638Korolev,K.S.,etal.(2014)Turningecologyandevolutionagainstcancer.NatRevCancer14,37371-3803839Peddareddigari,V.G.,etal.(2010)Thetumormicroenvironmentincolorectalcarcinogenesis.39CancerMicroenviron3,149-1664040Quante,M., et al. (2013) The gastrointestinal tumormicroenvironment.Gastroenterology41145,63-784241Calon,A., et al. (2012)Dependencyof colorectal cancerona TGF-beta-drivenprogram in43stromalcellsformetastasisinitiation.CancerCell22,571-58444
24
42Naito,Y.,etal.(1998)CD8+Tcellsinfiltratedwithincancercellnestsasaprognosticfactor1inhumancolorectalcancer.CancerRes58,3491-3494243Galon,J.,etal.(2006)Type,density,andlocationofimmunecellswithinhumancolorectal3tumorspredictclinicaloutcome.Science313,1960-1964444Galon,J.,etal.(2014)Towardstheintroductionofthe'Immunoscore'intheclassificationof5malignanttumours.JPathol232,199-209645 Carmeliet, P. and Jain, R.K. (2011) Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of7angiogenesis.Nature473,298-307846Mathonnet,M.,etal.(2014)Hallmarksincolorectalcancer:angiogenesisandcancerstem-9likecells.WorldJGastroenterol20,4189-41961047 Hurwitz, H., et al. (2004) Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for11metastaticcolorectalcancer.NEnglJMed350,2335-23421248 Hackl, C., et al. (2013) Metronomic oral topotecan prolongs survival and reduces liver13metastasis in improvedpreclinicalorthotopicandadjuvant therapycoloncancermodels.Gut1462,259-2711549Pasquier,E.,etal.(2010)Metronomicchemotherapy:newrationalefornewdirections.Nat16RevClinOncol7,455-4651750 Zitvogel, L., et al. (2013) Mechanism of action of conventional and targeted anticancer18therapies:reinstatingimmunosurveillance.Immunity39,74-881951 Putoczki, T.L., et al. (2013) Interleukin-11 is the dominant IL-6 family cytokine during20gastrointestinaltumorigenesisandcanbetargetedtherapeutically.CancerCell24,257-2712152 Calon, A., et al. (2014) TGF-beta in CAF-mediated tumor growth and metastasis. Semin22CancerBiol25,15-222353Fridlender,Z.G.,etal.(2009)Polarizationoftumor-associatedneutrophilphenotypebyTGF-24beta:"N1"versus"N2"TAN.CancerCell16,183-1942554 Gong, D., et al. (2012) TGFbeta signaling plays a critical role in promoting alternative26macrophageactivation.BMCImmunol13,312755 Pickup,M., et al. (2013) The roles of TGFbeta in the tumourmicroenvironment.Nat Rev28Cancer13,788-7992956 Thomas, D.A. andMassague, J. (2005) TGF-beta directly targets cytotoxic T cell functions30duringtumorevasionofimmunesurveillance.CancerCell8,369-3803157Yang,L.,etal.(2010)TGF-betaandimmunecells:animportantregulatoryaxisinthetumor32microenvironmentandprogression.TrendsImmunol31,220-2273358Chen,M.L., etal. (2005)RegulatoryT cells suppress tumor-specificCD8T cell cytotoxicity34throughTGF-betasignalsinvivo.ProcNatlAcadSciUSA102,419-4243559 Gorelik, L. and Flavell, R.A. (2001) Immune-mediated eradication of tumors through the36blockadeoftransforminggrowthfactor-betasignalinginTcells.NatMed7,1118-11223760 Kraman,M., et al. (2010) Suppression of antitumor immunity by stromal cells expressing38fibroblastactivationprotein-alpha.Science330,827-8303961 Feig, C., et al. (2013) Targeting CXCL12 from FAP-expressing carcinoma-associated40fibroblastssynergizeswithanti-PD-L1immunotherapyinpancreaticcancer.ProcNatlAcadSci41USA110,20212-202174262Akhurst,R.J.andHata,A. (2012)Targeting theTGFbetasignallingpathway indisease.Nat43RevDrugDiscov11,790-81144
25
63 Neuzillet, C., et al. (2015) Targeting the TGFbeta pathway for cancer therapy.Pharmacol1Ther147,22-31264 Smith, A.L., et al. (2012)Molecular pathways: targeting the TGF-beta pathway for cancer3therapy.ClinCancerRes18,4514-4521465Munoz, N.M., et al. (2006) Transforming growth factor beta receptor type II inactivation5inducesthemalignanttransformationofintestinalneoplasmsinitiatedbyApcmutation.Cancer6Res66,9837-9844766Fujii,M.,etal.(2016)AColorectalTumorOrganoidLibraryDemonstratesProgressiveLossof8NicheFactorRequirementsduringTumorigenesis.CellStemCell18,827-838967Yan,P.,etal.(2016)ReducedExpressionofSMAD4IsAssociatedwithPoorSurvivalinColon10Cancer.ClinCancerRes22,3037-30471168Alazzouzi,H.,etal. (2005)SMAD4asaprognosticmarker incolorectalcancer.ClinCancer12Res11,2606-26111369Fessler,E.,etal. (2016)TGFbetasignalingdirectsserratedadenomas to themesenchymal14colorectalcancersubtype.EMBOMolMed8,745-7601570Jung,P.,etal.(2011)Isolationandinvitroexpansionofhumancolonicstemcells.NatMed1617,1225-12271771 Sato, T., et al. (2009) Single Lgr5 stemcells build crypt-villus structures in vitrowithout a18mesenchymalniche.Nature459,262-2651972 Siolas, D. andHannon,G.J. (2013) Patient-derived tumor xenografts: transforming clinical20samplesintomousemodels.CancerRes73,5315-53192173Chambers,A.F., etal. (2002)Disseminationandgrowthof cancer cells inmetastatic sites.22NatRevCancer2,563-5722374Massague, J.andObenauf,A.C. (2016)Metastaticcolonizationbycirculating tumourcells.24Nature529,298-3062575Luzzi,K.J.,etal.(1998)Multistepnatureofmetastaticinefficiency:dormancyofsolitarycells26aftersuccessfulextravasationand limitedsurvivalofearlymicrometastases.AmJPathol153,27865-8732876Chaffer,C.L.andWeinberg,R.A.(2011)Aperspectiveoncancercellmetastasis.Science331,291559-15643077Jones,S.,etal.(2008)Comparativelesionsequencingprovidesinsightsintotumorevolution.31ProcNatlAcadSciUSA105,4283-42883278 Mlecnik, B., et al. (2016) The tumor microenvironment and Immunoscore are critical33determinantsofdisseminationtodistantmetastasis.SciTranslMed8,327ra3263479Steeg,P.S.(2016)Targetingmetastasis.NatRevCancer16,201-2183580 Terzic, J., et al. (2010) Inflammation and colon cancer.Gastroenterology 138, 2101-211436e21053781Grivennikov,S.I.,etal.(2010)Immunity,inflammation,andcancer.Cell140,883-8993882Rooney,M.S.,etal.(2015)Molecularandgeneticpropertiesoftumorsassociatedwithlocal39immunecytolyticactivity.Cell160,48-614083Schumacher,T.N.andSchreiber,R.D.(2015)Neoantigensincancerimmunotherapy.Science41348,69-744284Galluzzi,L.,etal.(2014)Classificationofcurrentanticancerimmunotherapies.Oncotarget5,4312472-1250844
26
85 Finn, O.J. (2012) Immuno-oncology: understanding the function and dysfunction of the1immunesystemincancer.AnnOncol23Suppl8,viii6-9286Palucka,A.K.andCoussens,L.M.(2016)TheBasisofOncoimmunology.Cell164,1233-1247387 Joyce, J.A. and Fearon, D.T. (2015) T cell exclusion, immune privilege, and the tumor4microenvironment.Science348,74-80588 Pardoll, D.M. (2012) Theblockadeof immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy.Nat6RevCancer12,252-264789Topalian,S.L.,etal.(2015)Immunecheckpointblockade:acommondenominatorapproach8tocancertherapy.CancerCell27,450-461990 Le,D.T., etal. (2015)PD-1Blockade inTumorswithMismatch-RepairDeficiency.NEngl J10Med372,2509-25201191Llosa,N.J.,etal. (2015)Thevigorous immunemicroenvironmentofmicrosatellite instable12coloncancerisbalancedbymultiplecounter-inhibitorycheckpoints.CancerDiscov5,43-511392Kloor,M.,etal. (2010) Immuneevasionofmicrosatelliteunstablecolorectalcancers. Int J14Cancer127,1001-10101593Sharma,P.andAllison,J.P.(2015) Immunecheckpointtargeting incancertherapy:toward16combinationstrategieswithcurativepotential.Cell161,205-2141794Vanneman,M.andDranoff,G.(2012)Combiningimmunotherapyandtargetedtherapiesin18cancertreatment.NatRevCancer12,237-2511995Massague,J.(2008)TGFbetainCancer.Cell134,215-2302096Markowitz,S.,etal.(1995)InactivationofthetypeIITGF-betareceptorincoloncancercells21withmicrosatelliteinstability.Science268,1336-13382297 Takaku, K., et al. (1998) Intestinal tumorigenesis in compoundmutantmiceof bothDpc423(Smad4)andApcgenes.Cell92,645-6562498 The Cancer Genome Atlas Network (2012) Comprehensive molecular characterization of25humancolonandrectalcancer.Nature487,330-3372699Tsushima,H., etal. (2001)Circulating transforminggrowth factorbeta1asapredictorof27livermetastasisafterresectionincolorectalcancer.ClinCancerRes7,1258-1262282930
TGF-β inhibitionImmunotherapy
Stromal therapy
Cancer activates Stroma
TME drives Immune Evasion & Drug Resistance
Stroma secretesProtumorigenic factors
EpithelialCancer cell
Lymphoctes
MonocyteMDSC Macrophage
Granulocyte
Dendritic Cell
MSC Extracellular Matrix
Endothelial cell Pericyte
CAF