Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
TASK 2 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM – EXISTING CONDITIONS
Transit Feasibility Study Task 2 | Technical Memorandum – Existing Conditions
Prepared by the VHB Team October 2018
Transit Feasibility Study Task 2 | Technical Memorandum – Existing Conditions
CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1
The Study Area ............................................................................................................................................. 2
Prior Studies and Plans ............................................................................................... 3
Study Area Population and Employment ...................................................................... 4
Land Use and Development ........................................................................................ 8
Recent Development Activity .................................................................................................................. 9
Transportation ........................................................................................................... 10
Roadways ............................................................................................................ 10
Transit ................................................................................................................. 13
MARTA Bus Service .................................................................................................................... 13
MARTA Rail Service ...................................................................................... 15
GRTA Xpress Routes in Study Area .............................................................. 16
Existing Transit Market ................................................................................... 18
Private Shuttles and TNCs ......................................................................................... 20
Walking and Biking .................................................................................................... 24
Planned Improvements .............................................................................................. 24
Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….25
Appendix ................................................................................................................... 26
Proposal Title Here
1
T
INTRODUCTION The Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study identifies transit needs
and recommended transit solutions to better serve the area near
Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (HJAIA).
Looking Ahead This study was initiated by the Aerotropolis Atlanta Community Improvement
Districts, working collaboratively with its members, key stakeholders, the
surrounding community, and local, regional and state agencies. This project
seeks to build on the current conditions and success of the district to further
improve mobility and make it easier to live, work and play in the area.
This document presents a summary of existing transit conditions in the study
area. It presents data describing the existing transit services and operating
conditions, distribution of people and jobs, and summarizes prior studies and
initiatives which contribute to our understanding of the area today and its
future potential.
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
2 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
The Study Area
For purposes of this study, the study area is defined as that same area examined by the AACIDs in
other recent studies such as the area’s Master Plan and Trail Plan as shown in Figure 1 below.
KEY PARTNERS
▪ City of Atlanta ▪ HJAIA
▪ City of College Park ▪ Airport South CID
▪ City of East Point ▪ Airport West CID
▪ City of Forest Park ▪ Clayton County
▪ City of Hapeville
▪ City of South Fulton
▪ Fulton County
Figure 1 – Study Area
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
3 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
PRIOR STUDIES AND PLANS The Aerotropolis area is a unique and dynamic part of the Atlanta region. It is a work-in-progress – continuing to
develop and evolve over time. There are many important studies and initiatives which contribute to our
understanding of current conditions, planned changes, and the potential for the future. These prior studies and
plans have been undertaken by the Atlanta Community Improvement Districts, the Aerotropolis Alliance, HJAIA,
the Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC), the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA), numerous
local governments, and others. A brief summary of each report and the relevance to this effort is presented in
Appendix. The prior and ongoing studies reviewed are listed in Table 1 below.
Table 1 – Prior and Ongoing Plans and Studies
PLANS AND STUDIES PREPARED BY
Aerotropolis Atlanta Alliance ULI mTAP Study Urban Land Institute
Aerotropolis Atlanta Blueprint Jacobs for ARC
Aerotropolis Atlanta Master Plan Kimley Horn for the Atlanta CIDs
Also include Aerotropolis Virginia Avenue
Corridor Study
Kimley Horn
AeroATL Greenway Plan Sizemore Group for the Atlanta CIDs
Atlanta’s Transportation Plan VHB, Nelson Nygaard for the City of Atlanta
Clayton County CTP URS, MPH and Associates, Turner Associates, Joel F. Stone,
D. Clark Harris for Clayton County DOT and Development Authority
Clayton County High Capacity Transit Initiative
Baseline Conditions Report
VHB for MARTA
Clayton County High Capacity Transit Initiative
Purpose and Need Report
VHB for MARTA
Fulton County Transit Master Plan Kimley Horn for ARC
East Point LCI
GDOT HSR Atlanta to Charlotte/Atlanta to
Chattanooga
HTNB
GRTA Comprehensive Operations Analysis GRTA
Hapeville LCI Sizemore Group
MARTA COA Nelson Nygaard / VHB for MARTA
More MARTA Initiative City of Atlanta
Navigate to 2030: ATL Master Plan Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport
Northwest Clayton LCI Study Robert and Company, The Collaborative Firm and GRICE and
Associates for Clayton County
Mountain View Jacobs and Smith Real Estate Services for Clayton County
Mountain View Redevelopment Plan
Redevelopment Authority of Clayton County, Clayton County
Department of Economic Development, and Huntley Partners, Inc.
for Clayton County
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
4 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
South Fulton CID Multimodal
Transportation Study
Cambridge Systematics for South Fulton CID
South Fulton CTP ARCADIS
Southside Hartsfield Redevelopment and
Stabilization Plan
Clayton County
STUDY AREA POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT The pattern and density of population and employment of an area are critical to designing effective transit
systems and services Figure 2 displays current and future population projections in the study area. Transit
performs best where there is a high density of people, jobs and/or key travel destinations. In the Atlanta
Aerotropolis area, we have all three. In addition to the importance of densities is also the location of population
and employment; In Figure 4 the location of population density is concentrated near Camp Creek Parkway and
southeast in the study area, mostly in Clayton County. In Figure 5 employment density is highest on the edges of
the Airport and in clusters on Camp Creek Parkway, Cargo City, Hapeville, and other activity centers.
Similar Comparisons
The Aerotropolis study area just by itself is similar in size to a small city–such as Birmingham, AL or Richmond,
VA. And, with the MARTA rail connection, it is connected to a transit service area of approximately 1.7 million
persons.
Figure 2 - Existing and Future Population
Growth of 267,619 people
26.85% Growth996,757
270,269
197,560
1,264,376
327,552
256,805
Growth of 57,283 people
21.19% Growth
Growth of 59,245 people
30% Growth
2016 Population 2040 Population
Study
Area
Clayton
County
Fulton
County
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
5 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
Figure 3 presents the existing and future projected employment in the study
area, Fulton County and Clayton County (including those cities in Fulton County
and Clayton County). The projected growth rate in the study area is in line with
the projected growth in those counties as a whole. The study area employment is
nearly as large as the total population, indicating that the study area is an
importer of workers to satisfy all those jobs. The number of jobs in the study area
is similar to an entire mid-sized metropolitan area such as Savannah, GA or
Gainesville, FL, and is a significant contributor to the Atlanta region’s jobs and
economy.
Figure 3 - Existing and Future Employment
*Study area 2015 employment is based on data from the US Bureau of Census for census tracts which approximate the study area boundary. Year 2040
projections are from the Atlanta Regional Commission.
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
6 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
Figure 4 – Population Density
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
7 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
Figure 5 – Employment Density
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
While one might think of the airport itself as being highly
developed, there remains a surprising amount of land near the
airport which is undeveloped or under-developed. The existing
land cover is illustrated on Figure 6. The lighter tones and the
green areas identify open spaces or undeveloped areas. In
addition, some of the areas identified with darker red colors
(medium intensity or high intensity developed) are ripe for
redevelopment or infill development.
Figure 6 – Existing Land Cover
OPPORTUNITY AREA
The Aerotropolis Atlanta Blueprint 2016
surveyed the uses in the Aerotropolis
area and concluded:
About 50% is an Opportunity Area for
significant development.
(That’s 80.65 square miles of the
161 total square miles)
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
8 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
Recent Development Activity These are three recently noteworthy developments which point to the area’s recent surge in development and
redevelopment.
Porsche Experience Center
Porsche located their new North America
headquarters and the Porsche Experience Center,
in 2015. In addition to this facility there is a luxury
hotel, Solis, which has rooms and office space
with a Porsche theme.
Photo courtesy of Porsche.
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
9 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
Gateway Center at College Park
The City of College Park, Georgia International
Convention Center (GICC) and the Atlanta Hawks
are building a multipurpose arena to be a sports
and entertainment venue. This 5,000-seat venue
will be home to the Hawks G League basketball
games and will open in 2019. New construction of
hotels, the Atlanta Airport Marriott Gateway and
the Renaissance Atlanta Airport Gateway, and an
office building are near the GICC.
Rendering courtesy of Atlanta Hawks
Airport City College Park
The 320-acre, $500 million Airport City College
Park was announced in April 2018. This
redevelopment is adjacent to downtown College
Park and the College Park MARTA station,
extending to across Camp Creek Parkway from
the Georgia International Convention Center and
the Airport’s Sky Train.
Rendering courtesy of Aerotropolis Atlanta
The above are just a few examples of recent and ongoing development activity in the area, with other
development activity occurring along Camp Creek Parkway, US 29, and South Fulton Parkway. Considering the
extensive amount of property right for development and redevelopment, there exists much potential for continued
development in the area. Servicing that growth with mobility solutions will be key to the area’s continued success.
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
10 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
TRANSPORTATION The Aerotropolis area is built around transportation–air, highway, and rail. It’s all about mobility of both people
and goods. Congestion of roadways affects certain transit services, and it affects people’s travel choices. Therefore,
this section presents an overview of both roadway and transit services and conditions in the study area.
Roadways
While this study focuses on transit services, needs and
opportunities in the Aerotropolis area, roadway conditions are
also important in this multi-modal environment. The study area is
served by I-75 and I-85 providing the regional north-south
connectivity, and by I-285 providing important cross-radial
connection. Important east-west connections include Camp
Creek Parkway, South Fulton Parkway and Forest Parkway.
Camp Creek Parkway west of I-285 is an important regional
freight corridor, connecting to the Fulton Industrial Boulevard
area. Camp Creek Parkway east of I-285 is a major feeder to the
Airport. And, Forest Parkway connects Forest Park to I-75 and to
airport-related industries located just outside the airport fence.
The Aerotropolis CIDs will soon be undertaking a freight study to
look more specifically at freight mobility in the area.
CONGESTION LEVELS
The Aerotropolis area sees perhaps less congestion than other
parts of the metro area. Figure 7 on the next page shows current
(year 2015) levels of congestion for a typical weekday.
Acceptable levels of traffic service are shown with green and
yellow, while orange and red illustrate roadways with undesirable
levels of traffic congestion. Figure 8 shows that same data as
predicted for year 2040. As shown, there will be a noticeable
increase in traffic congestion in the Aerotropolis study area.
Traffic congestion in the Aerotropolis area is especially
undesirable, because mobility is perhaps the key asset near the
airport. This points to the need to improve all modes of travel
within the study area.
[Grab your reader’s attention with a great
quote from the document or use this
space to emphasize a key point. To place
this text box anywhere on the page, just
drag it.]
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
11 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
Figure 7 – 2015 Level of Service
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
12 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
Figure 8 – 2040 Level of Service
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
13 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
Transit
The existing transit systems and services in the Aerotropolis area include MARTA rail and bus service, numerous
private shuttles, and airport-related systems such as the SkyTrain and Plane Train. Georgia Regional
Transportation Authority (GRTA) Xpress bus services pass through the study area and include park-and-ride lots
just beyond the study area boundary. And, AMTRAK and Greyhound operate from downtown Atlanta, connected
to the Aerotropolis area via MARTA rail.
MARTA BUS SERVICE
MARTA has 24 bus routes and approximately 1,066 bus stops in
the study area. The bus routes are shown in Figure 9 and a
summary of their operating service is provided below in Table 2.
Route 191 makes a stop at the airport in the International
terminal; other bus routes terminate at one of the MARTA rail
stations. MARTA service to the main airport passenger terminal is
provided by rail only. Buses operate within the study area
generally between 4:30am to after midnight, but not 24-hours per
day. Bus frequency varies depending on the day of the week and
time of day anywhere between 15 minutes and 60 minutes, with
20 - 30 minute headways most common. MARTA expanded into
Clayton County in 2015 and continues to expand that service;
however, currently those routes are less frequent than some of
the more established routes in Fulton County.
Table 2 – MARTA Bus Routes
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
14 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
Figure 9 – Existing Transit Systems
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
15 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
MARTA RAIL SERVICE
The MARTA rail system provides the backbone to the Aerotropolis transit
system. Rail stations exist in the Airport terminal, in downtown College Park, and
in downtown East Point, and are all well used. Nearly all MARTA bus routes in
the study area terminates at one of these rail stations. The existing weekday
ridership ranges from approximately 11,000 – 19,000 per day. These three
stations are among the top five busiest stations in the entire MARTA system, and
the only busier station is MARTA’s Five Points station where the north-south and
east-west lines intersect.
Table 3 – MARTA Rail Weekday Ridership
STATION MARTA AVERAGE WEEKDAY RIDERSHIP WEEKLY
OPERATING
TIMES ENTRY EXITS
East Point Red/Gold 5,349 5,618 5:30 am – 1 am
College Park Red/Gold 9,593 9,235 5:30 am – 1 am
Airport Red/Gold 9,586 8,752 5:30 am – 1 am
MARTA’s Airport Station
MARTA’s Airport station is directly connected to the passenger terminal, providing a direct connection from
the airport to the entire rail system
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
16 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
GRTA XPRESS ROUTES IN STUDY AREA
GRTA operates numerous Xpress bus routes which pass
through the study area. Several Xpress park-and-ride lots
currently exist south of the study area. None of the current
Xpress routes stop within the Aerotropolis area. Current
Xpress routes passing through the study area have
destinations in downtown or midtown Atlanta. Recently,
GRTA initiated a transit service expansion study to examine
the potential to add service to the airport area from
elsewhere in the Atlanta region. Presumably, potential future
Xpress connections would serve the Aerotropolis area from
origins outside of the MARTA rail service area.
Table 4 – GRTA Xpress Routes Near the Study Area
To From Time Frequency
430 McDonough Downtown 5:20am – 9:08am
2:55pm – 7:30pm
16
431 Stockbridge Midtown 5:30am – 9:32am
3:00pm – 6:43pm
14
432 Stockbridge Downtown 5:30am – 9:23am
3:00pm – 7:30pm
20
440 Hampton Downtown 5:15am – 9:22am
1:05pm – 7:58pm
24
441 Jonesboro Midtown
442 Riverdale Downtown 5:30am – 8:51am
3:30pm – 6:38pm
10
453 Newnan/Union
City
Downtown/
Midtown
5:30am – 9:44am
3:00pm – 7:34pm
16
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
17 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
EXISTING TRANSIT MARKET
Travel data from the Atlanta Regional
Commission’s (ARC) regional travel model was
examined to better understand the existing and
future transit “market” (i.e. the users and modes of
choice) in the study area. These trips are shown in
Table 5 for various travel markets. As expected,
transit use is highest among transit-dependent
individuals. Transit use is also significantly higher
than average among university students (mostly
trips by students whose trip begins within the
study area with a destination outside the study
area). The highest percentage of trips by single
occupant vehicle is for retirees–perhaps due to
their unique travel needs.
Shared Ride
Transit
Other
60%27%
7%5%
All Trips
Within
Study AreaSOV
SharedRides
Figure 10 – All Trips Within Study Area
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
18 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
Table 6 shows the same transit market data as predicted for year 2040. Many of the general patterns and
observations are not significantly different as the year 2015 information. However, the anticipated growth in travel
by mode is interesting – where SOV trips are predicted to grow by 38% overall, transit by 34%, walk/bike by 28%,
followed by shared ride trips increasing by 19%. So, while we have seen in recent years a surge in shared ride trips
through the proliferation of Transportation Network Companies (such as Uber and Lyft), this information suggests
that this trend will level off and future growth will be greater for both SOV trips and transit trips. Studies from the
Aerotropolis Master Plan show, “aging in place” meaning, the average age of residents to increase due to staying
in the same area after retirement. The largest growth in travel in the study area is predicted to be by retirees–
perhaps reflecting the ages of the area’s residents nearing typical retirement age.
It should be noted that these future trip patterns are partly dependent on the infrastructure which is provided for
each travel mode – so, investments in transit may allow for even greater increases beyond the predicted 34%
status-quo growth. In addition, these forecasts are based on ARC’s current population and employment forecasts,
and do not include the additional growth potential within the Aerotropolis area.
Shared Ride
Transit
Walk/Bike
60%27%
8%5%
All Trips
2015SOV
38%
38%
5%
Trips from
Zero-car
Households
2015Transit
Walk/Bike 0% SOV
Shared RideShared
Ride
Figure 11Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
19 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
Table 5 – Change in Transit Market Trips in Study Area
Transit
Market Category
CHANGE BY MODE
Single
Occupant
Vehicle
Shared Ride Transit Walk/Bike
All All Trips 38% 19% 34% 28%
Low Auto
Ownership
Trips from low-income HH 55% 20% 46% 40%
Trips from zero-car HHs 0% 32% 51% 38%
Trips from HH with fewer cars
than workers 92% 21% 37% 29%
Commuter Trips by full-time workers 31% 18% 31% 23%
Trips by part-time workers 45% 22% 41% 36%
Other Trips by university students 26% 14% 34% 20%
Trips by retirees 141% 128% 116% 122%
Table 6 – 2015 Transit Market Trips in Study Area
Transit
Market Category
TRIPS BY MODE
Single
Occupant
Vehicle
Shared Ride Transit Walk/Bike
All All Trips 168,033 75,987 20,704 13,840
Low Auto
Ownership
Trips from low-income HH 18,504 15,970 4,564 6,053
Trips from zero-car HHs 0 7,431 7,513 4,662
Trips from HH with fewer cars
than workers
12,952 13,651 11,482 4,917
Commuter Trips by full-time workers 126,626 13,651 13,200 3,943
Trips by part-time workers 26,901 28,473 3,932 2,247
Other Trips by university students 5,428 9,236 1,979 904
Trips by retirees 11,912 2,897 1,016 673
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
20 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
Table 7 – 2040 Transit Market Trips in Study Area
Transit
Market Category
TRIPS BY MODE
Single
Occupant
Vehicle
Shared Ride Transit Walk/Bike
All All Trips 231,983 90,761 27,732 17,674
Low Auto
Ownership
Trips from low-income HH 28,721 19,235 6,666 8,448
Trips from zero-car HHs 0 9,780 11,334 6,441
Trips from HH with fewer cars
than workers
24,858 16,464 15,731 6,367
Commuter Trips by full-time workers 165,286 33,677 17,271 4,855
Trips by part-time workers 39,130 11,304 5,554 3,067
Other Trips by university students 6,838 3,487 2,656 1,083
Trips by retirees 28,737 6,595 2,193 1,497
PRIVATE SHUTTLES AND TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANIES
Transportation Network Companies (TNC)
Outside of transit, other options, such as private shuttles and transportation network companies (TNCs) are
utilized to take people to and from their various destinations. are airport shuttles for car rentals, hotels, and others.
Rideshare services such as Uber and Lyft are also present. Effective August 16, rideshare drivers will pick up
passengers at the North and South economy lots. Drop-off locations at the North and South roadways will not
change, and there are no changes to rideshare pick-up locations at the International Terminal.
Private Shuttles
The Airport has multiple shuttle products serving a variety of passengers including airline passengers, hotel
guests, and employees (retail, service, airline, etc.) and more from the International and Domestic Terminals.
Funded by employers or vendors (hotel or parking) shuttles have the propensity to save time and money for
passengers. Though many exist, only some are relevant to this study for candidates for replacement or
supplemented with transit. These typically have high frequency (arriving every 15 minutes or less) and travel short
distances to The Airport sharing roads with other shuttles and existing transit service. All observations took place
on July 31st between mid-day. Conclusions expressed are based on observation that may vary from operations of
shuttle providers.
Parking Shuttles
Parking shuttles travel to three locations: “off airport” parking areas, the west curb of the Domestic Terminal, and
the International Terminal. These services travel with high frequency on Camp Creek Parkway to access remote
parking lots located to the west of The Airport.
The west curb of the Domestic Terminal has dedicated space to shuttle parking. During observation, 11 off-airport
parking vendors were counted (Appendix). Shuttles depart approximately every 43 seconds and operate on a
scheduled frequency, without departing after reaching capacity. Approximately half of the shuttles were empty
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
21 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
upon departure from the west curb. These shuttles seat 10-12 passengers with room for luggage and appear to
be in good condition.
The International Terminal has fewer parking shuttles, with only 2 off-airport parking providers servicing shuttles
to this terminal. One exclusively serves the International Terminal; the other is situated north of The Airport with
passengers using both Domestic Terminal and International Terminal.
In addition, The Airport runs its own parking shuttle service at each terminal. The Domestic Terminal has a
separate loading bay more convenient to travelers than the off-airport parking shuttles. These shuttles have very
high frequency, departing every 4 minutes and making short runs to nearby “park-ride” on-airport parking lots or,
in the case of the International Terminal, an on-airport garage.
Analysis
The parking business is heavily dependent on shuttles to differentiate businesses through customer service and
branding. It is assumed that a significant part of parking operating expenses involves shuttle costs. Potential
financial savings could indicate parking companies’ propensity to partner on a transit project to reduce costs and
leverage government subsidies. However, a big part of the customer service experience differentiating the
providers is the proximity of drop-offs at or near passengers’ vehicles. Shuttles drop customers at or near their
cars deep inside large parking lots eliminating long walks to the road where transit would stop. Parking Spot 2, for
example, is nearly one-half mile long – a burdensome journey that would require a circulator within the lot and a
“two-seat” trip to the Airport after the car trip. Unless the Airport limits the entry of parking shuttles, parking
operators are not likely to partner with transit providers – even with high quality transit options.
In the long-term, growth in the parking business at and near airports is vulnerable to the growth of transportation
network companies, which offer one-seat rides to The Airport at competitive prices for travelers. This further limits
the likelihood of a partnership between parking vendors and transit providers.
Hotel Shuttles
Like parking shuttles, hotel shuttles are provided an aisle of their own on the west curb of the Domestic Terminal.
The Airport’s website shows 62 hotels with shuttle service to the west curb of the Domestic Terminal. During
observation, 26 hotel shuttles were documented to provide arrival frequencies of one-hour or less (Appendix).
Those listed by The Airport but not observed may represent on-call services or operate during peak periods only.
On average, hotel bound shuttles depart the west curb every 45 seconds. Hotel shuttles have generally lower
frequencies than parking shuttles. Thirty minutes is typical, with a similar number offering 15 minute service; only
4 offer 10-minute service.
Compared to parking shuttles, hotel shuttle bus conditions were in needs of exterior repair. Most of the buses
were small – seating 10 passengers plus luggage. The collectively relatively poor condition of the shuttles may
indicate that providing the service is a burden.
Online reviews and informal discussions with waiting passengers indicate that many employees working at The
Airport use hotel parking to save time and money to reduce parking costs.
Analysis
Shuttle service is expensive to operate and likely thinning profit margins at hotels which compete for air traveler
business. This in turn diminishes the likelihood of reinvestment in the hotel properties themselves lending a dated
air to many hotel properties in The Airport vicinity. Hotel owners and operators could perhaps be convinced to
pool resources for a transit service that efficiently served multiple hotels in the arc around the airport.
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
22 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
Domestic to International Shuttle
The Airport operates a shuttle between the west curb of the Domestic Terminal and Arrivals at the International
Terminal. It departs every 6 minutes during the day for an 11-15 minute ride to the other terminal along the North
Inner Loop Road. This shuttle is necessary because the plane train internal to The Airport cannot ferry
passengers exiting customs in the International Terminal. Furthermore, Atlanta-area passengers arriving in the
Domestic Terminal cannot directly access the International Terminal (unless they are flying on Delta which has a
special arrangement). The shuttle therefore serves as a last-mile connectivity to the International Terminal for
passengers arriving on MARTA and for those using regional shuttle services or hotel shuttles on the west curb of
the Domestic Terminal.
Analysis
With drivers supported with baggage assistants for loading passengers’ belongings and efficient, aesthetic shuttle
design, shuttle service operates successfully between the Domestic and International terminals. Shuttle service
seeks improvements in wayfinding and congestion. For example, congestion increases along N. Loop Road in the
afternoon peak leading to delays, especially at the turn onto Maynard Jackson Blvd – the main road leading to the
International Terminal.
An additional stop at the entrance to Delta Headquarters could facilitate easy and frequent access for Delta HQ
employees to travel between work and the Airport MARTA station. With this additional stop, Delta could reduce
Delta’s operating costs as the shuttles duplicate routes. Larger capacity vehicles would be required to avoid
crowding and delays. If placed on the far-side at the traffic signal, the stop would cause minimal delay and limited
additional congestion at intersections.
Employee Shuttles
The Hartsfield-Jackson Airport and subsidiary operations is the largest employer in Georgia. There are at least 2
major employer shuttles operating at and near the Airport – Delta and ABM.
Delta
Delta provides service in at least three forms all of which are operated by ABM Airport:
1. Shuttle between a 4,000 space off-airport parking lot on Camp Creek Blvd and the west curb of the
Domestic Terminal where there is a dedicated shuttle bay. This shuttle provides service for employees
accessing the airport itself.
2. Shuttle between General Office East and Domestic Terminal South on a round trip makes an additional
stop for administrative employees at the headquarters entrance off of North Loop Road during peak
periods and is otherwise available 24 hours a day, seven days a week on twenty-minute intervals.
3. Atlanta Worldport Delta Shuttle operates 7:30 am – 5:30 pm Monday through Friday and travels in a loop
from the headquarters entrance off North Loop Road to the Technical Operations Center across from the
International Terminal and then to the Domestic Terminal. This enables Delta office employees to access
Airport MARTA station.
ABM Airport
Employee Lot #3 is also referred to as the Airline Employee Parking Lot or the AATC Lot on the south side of The
Airport off of South Loop Road. These are largely TSA and other security-oriented employees as well as some
airline employees from Delta and Southwest. A mid-day observation showed large 40+ passenger shuttles
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
23 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
arriving every 6 minutes. This service is also operated by ABM Airport; the client is assumed to be The Airport
itself.
Analysis
Like the parking shuttles referenced above, the employee shuttles travel deeply into large parking lots and pick up
employees close to their cars. However, these passengers are typically not carrying luggage or packages. Given
the frequency of buses and the volume of passengers, it may be that the services are fully self-supporting from a
business case perspective; however, discussions with the managers of these services could yield an interest in
exploring synergies. Given the size and complexity of the organizations; staff engaged with this transit study were
not successful at scheduling an in-depth discussion.
Other Shuttles
Shared-Ride Shuttles have both local and regional services. Every 15 minutes local providers depart The Airport
to serve the metro area. Regional providers serving markets outside of the metro area depart every 30 minutes.
They have their own bus bays on the west curb of the Domestic Terminal. Given their market, these are not seen
as potential partners for an Aerotropolis transit solution.
WALKING AND BIKING
Provisions for walking and biking in the Aerotropolis area exist but are not continuous throughout the study area.
Sidewalks generally exist in town centers such as College Park, East Point, and Hapeville, but are lacking on
major travel corridors study as Riverdale Road and Camp Creek Parkway. Currently, Aerotropolis CIDs are
conducting community meetings to gain input from residents for Aerotropolis Greenway. Strong affinity for a multi-
use trail for access to businesses, entertainment, exercise, and leisure has been expressed in community
engagement meetings for Aerotropolis Greenway. In addition, requests for connections have been expressed
between the tri-cities (College Park, East Point, and Hapeville), from the Airport Loop to Forest Park, Forest Park
to MARTA, to the Camp Creek Marketplace, and to the airplane viewing areas. Aerotropolis CIDS and residents
are in the process of finalizing a draft plan to be adopted by all affiliated partners.
PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS
Figure 13 locates major transportation improvements which are currently planned in the study area. These
include some relatively minor highway and street improvements, plus a planned high capacity MARTA transit
corridor from the MARTA East Point station south into Clayton County. This project is currently under study and
development by MARTA and Clayton County. MARTA is examining commuter rail, heavy rail, bus rapid transit or
light rail as viable modes in this corridor. The preliminary concept is for a commuter rail type of train extended
around the east side of the airport and southward ultimately to Jonesboro. There is potential for this system to be
constructed in several phases spread over several years. MARTA and Clayton County are also currently studying
how the addition of this high capacity transit system will change the configuration of local bus services to best
align with the high capacity corridor.
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
24 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
Figure 13 – Existing Regional Plans
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
25 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
CONCLUSION The Aerotropolis study area is large and diverse. The population living in this large area is somewhat dispersed,
while jobs are relatively concentrated in key job centers. This area is a net importer of workers – having more jobs
than population. And, current forecasts predict strong job growth, such that this area will continue to be a major
employment center for the Atlanta region. The study area is served my many types of transportation modes and
services. The area is well served by highways and congestion levels are lower than in many other parts of the
metro Atlanta area. The airport itself is well connected to downtown Atlanta via the MARTA rail system. However,
the study area is not well connected from parts of the region to the west, east and south. And, transit mobility
within the study area is challenging. Existing transit services also do not provide for the 24/7 characteristics of
many of the jobs in the study area. Considering the current low overall transit mode share and strong job growth,
there is significant potential to improve transit use through expanded services and systems.
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
26 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
APPENDIX
STUDY TITLE STUDY TYPE PREPARED BY DATE
COMPLETED PURPOSE AND FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS
Aerotropolis Atlanta
Alliance ULI mTAP Study
mini Technical
Assistance Panel Land
Use/ Zoning Evaluation
Urban Land Institute Ongoing Aerotropolis Atlanta Alliance
The Aerotropolis Atlanta Alliance is a non-profit membership organization and a
coalition of business and community leaders that work to make the area around
Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (H-JAIA) a leading destination for
businesses and residents. The Alliance recently developed a Blueprint that
identified several catalytic development locations in the area immediately
surrounding H-JAIA that could support growth in five target industry clusters.
These target clusters were identified in the Blueprint as having the greatest
potential to foster economic development in the Aerotropolis area based on
existing strengths, namely, the presence of H-JAIA. The clusters identified are the
following: Aerospace Training and Manufacturing; Logistics and Distribution; Food
and Agribusiness; Multimedia Production; Bio-Science Industries.
The common development challenge among these different catalytic sites is the
current and future zoning and land-use in the Aerotropolis area and whether it
coincides with the land use and zoning needs of the target industries. For the
Alliance to support its communities to attract and retain businesses in the target
industries, it is important that the communities support the needs of those
businesses. The presence of several municipalities and counties has created a
patchwork of land use zoning regulations. If land use and zoning is not
coordinated in regional manner that is sensitive to the opportunities present in
each catalytic area, the result could pose an impediment to these sites realizing
their full economic potential. The client would like the mTAP team to research and
study the different zoning ordinances in each area and confirm that they are a
conducive to maximize the potential economic development for each target
cluster.
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
27 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
STUDY TITLE STUDY TYPE PREPARED BY DATE
COMPLETED PURPOSE AND FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS
Aerotropolis Atlanta
Blueprint
Blueprint Jacobs for ARC 2015 ▪ Detail state regional and local plans in the area near the Hartsfield-Jackson
Atlanta International Airport, demographic snapshot, and market trends for the
area.
▪ Population declined from 2000–2010 in census tracts adjacent to the airport,
except for parts of northwest Clayton County; population increased in South
Fulton County
▪ Vacant housing units are concentrated around the airport, with rates of 20 to 38
percent
▪ Household income increases with distance from the airport
▪ Only 15 percent of workers employed in the Aerotropolis area also live in the
area
• 152,193 workers commute in
• 72,863 workers commute out
• 27,287 workers live and work in the area
▪ There is a significant amount of commercial real estate in the Aerotropolis area:
• 7.9 million SF of hotel space
• 23.7 million SF of retail space
• 10.4 million SF of office space
▪ Historic resources include:
• National register historic districts (Hapeville, College Park, East Point,
Fairburn, Lakewood Heights, Oakland City, Capitol View Manor)
Aerotropolis Atlanta
Master Plan
Master Plan Kimley Horn for the
Atlanta CIDs
2017 The purpose of this plan is to show the synergy of the two CIDs, West and South,
and to formulate synergizing, in tandem goals and visions of the CID to have the
brand and perception of the area through economic development projects through
infrastructure, beautification, public safety, and wayfinding.
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
28 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
STUDY TITLE STUDY TYPE PREPARED BY DATE
COMPLETED PURPOSE AND FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS
AeroATL Greenway Plan
Greenway Master Plan Sizemore Group for
the Atlanta CIDs
On Going In early 2017, the Aerotropolis Atlanta Community Improvement Districts (AACIDs)
was awarded a grant from the Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC) to complete
the AeroATL Greenway Plan. When complete, the AeroATL Greenway Plan will
be a comprehensive trail master plan for the Aerotropolis area, connecting the
communities around Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (H-JAIA).
Each of the partners (Aerotropolis Atlanta Alliance, Aerotropolis Atlanta CIDs,
College Park, Clayton County, East Point, City of South Fulton, Forest Park,
Fulton County, Hapeville, and H-JAIA) have identified a need for a greenway plan
through the Aerotropolis Atlanta Alliance Blueprint, approved in 2016. In addition
to the ARC grant, each of the local partners have contributed funds toward the
study.
Guide decision making of the Atlanta Regional Commission by describing a
regional framework for walking and biking and support implementation by
describing how local jurisdictions and regional partners can build walking and
biking networks and supporting policies and programs
▪ Establish a walk and bike friendly communities resource center
▪ Develop a walk and bike friendly technical assistance program for the region
▪ Create a high crash corridor safety program
▪ Develop scoring criteria for Transportation Alternatives Program funds
The AeroATL Greenway Plan will build on the greenway idea proposed in
Aerotropolis Atlanta Alliance Blueprint, considering existing trails, topography, key
connection points and best practices. A significant amount of public input will be
sought to complement the technical work.
Atlanta’s Transportation
Plan
Comprehensive
Transportation Plan
VHB, Nelson
Nygaard for the City
of Atlanta
2017 The purpose of the ATP was for the City of Atlanta to prepare for the influx of
population growth and managing the mobility of its current and future residents. As
these people work and travel, it is imperative to see the impact that local traffic
and in the city limits of Atlanta affect the travel patterns and behaviors of those
who live and or work from the AeroCIDs.
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
29 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
STUDY TITLE STUDY TYPE PREPARED BY DATE
COMPLETED PURPOSE AND FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS
Clayton County CTP Comprehensive
Transportation Plan
URS, MPH and
Associates, Turner
Associates, Joel F.
Stone, D. Clark
Harris for Clayton
County Department
of Transportation and
Development
October 2008 Addresses the long-range multi-modal transportation needs of Clayton County
through 2030 by identifying transportation strategies, projects, and programs. The
following are key recommendations from the CTP:
▪ Regional Commuter Rail service from Lovejoy to Atlanta
• MARTA Heavy Rail Extension Corridor Study from East Point to the Southern
Crescent Transportation Service Center
• SR 85 widening from I-75 to Adams Drive
• SR 85 widening from SR 279 to Roberts Drive
• SR 54 widening from McDonough Road to US 19/41
• US 19/41 widening from SR 81 to Flint River Road
• Southern Crescent Transportation Service Center (SCTSC)
• TPB Concept 3 regional arterial BRT service from SCTSC to Newnan,
Fayetteville, and Griffin
• TPB Concept 3 interstate BRT along I-75, I-675, and I-285
• I-75 South managed lanes from Aviation Boulevard to Eagles Landing
Parkway
• US 23 widening from SR 138 to I-675
• I-675 widening from Panola Road to I-75 (Long Range)
• US 19/41 grade separated super arterial (Long Range)
• TPB Concept 3 Inter-County Suburban Route Concepts - Union City to
Southlake, Newnan to Stockbridge, Jonesboro to McDonough (Long Range)
• US 23 widening from Lake Harbin Road to Anvil Block Road (Long Range)
Clayton County High
Capacity Transit Initiative
Baseline Conditions
Report
VHB High Capacity Transit focuses on defining viable Transit Investments to promote
growth and economic development in the County, exploring different alignment,
transit technology options, designing to improve Clayton County’s transportation
mobility, accessibility, and connectivity to the Atlanta region. This report includes
existing transit and mobility data by establishing inventory of corridors in the
county, high demand for existing transit use and need for expanded high capacity
transit service, and public and CAG input.
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
30 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
STUDY TITLE STUDY TYPE PREPARED BY DATE
COMPLETED PURPOSE AND FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS
Clayton County High
Capacity Transit Initiative
Purpose and Need
Report
VHB High Capacity Transit focuses on defining viable Transit Investments to promote
growth and economic development in the County, exploring different alignment,
transit technology options, designing to improve Clayton County’s transportation
mobility, accessibility, and connectivity to the Atlanta region and a 20-year vision
for transit needs and opportunities.
Fulton County Transit
Master Plan
Master Plan Kimley Horn The FCTMP is a collaborative between the 14 mayors of outside Atlanta and with
the Fulton County Commission to determine a plan of action for the funding and
implementation of existing transit services and needs within Fulton County.
GDOT HSR Atlanta to
Charlotte/Atlanta to
Chattanooga
HNTB
Currently, the state and interstate highway system between Atlanta and
Chattanooga are operating at or near capacity, and are unable to keep pace with
transportation demand resulting from population growth in the region. This is
especially evident within and adjacent to the major metropolitan areas of Atlanta,
Rome, Dalton and Chattanooga. Although capacity improvements to the state and
interstate system along the corridor are either currently underway or planned for
the near future, they are considered interim, that is, they will not address all of the
future capacity or mobility needs. Social and economic demands will continue to
call for provision of alternative transportation choices for those individuals who
cannot or choose not to drive, as well as those travelers looking for alternatives to
congested highways. An HSGT system between Atlanta and Chattanooga has the
potential of meeting this need for a non-highway transportation alternative.
GRTA Comprehensive
Operations Analysis
(COA)
Comprehensive
Operations Analysis
GRTA
MARTA COA Nelson Nygaardt /
VHB for MARTA
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
31 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
STUDY TITLE STUDY TYPE PREPARED BY DATE
COMPLETED PURPOSE AND FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS
More MARTA Initiative City of Atlanta
Navigate to 2030: ATL
Master Plan
Airport Plan Hartsfield-Jackson
Atlanta International
Airport
March 2015 Guide facility development that will accommodate future commercial aviation
needs of the region through 2030.
▪ Reconstruct and expand domestic terminal parking decks
▪ Add new concourses (G, H, and I)
▪ Relocate Plane Train turnback to increase capacity
▪ Add a closely spaced runway between existing runways on the south side
Northwest Clayton LCI
Study
LCI Study Robert and
Company, The
Collaborative Firm
and GRICE and
Associates for
Clayton County
2004, 2011 Aid the redevelopment of Northwest Clayton by supporting a live, work, and play
community
▪ Construct a new interchange at I-285 to serve the industrial redevelopment of
the Cherry Hills subdivision
▪ Provide transit service on Godby Road, West Fayetteville Road, and East
Pleasant Hill Road
▪ Construct bus shelters to support transit services
Prepared for Clayton County by the Collaborative Firm, LLC, Grice and
Associates, and Robert and Company December 2004
The Northwest Clayton LCI was prepared to aide in redevelopment and to support
a “live, work and play” environment for the community. The study provides a five-
year action plan of prioritized transportation capital improvement projects and
initiatives to be undertaken in the short-term.
▪ Recommended projects include streetscape, intersection/interchange, roadway,
transit and recreation facility improvement recommendations
▪ Larger issues addressed in the study include:
▪ Current construction and anticipated future impacts of the 5th runway at
Hartsfield Jackson Atlanta International Airport
▪ Traffic congestion and related impacts on connectivity
▪ Linkages to other county and regional centers
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
32 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
STUDY TITLE STUDY TYPE PREPARED BY DATE
COMPLETED PURPOSE AND FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS
▪ The potential for large-scale redevelopment of the Cherry Hills subdivision, and
▪ Opportunities to bring in new community facilities (parks, recreation,
greenspace) and services
Mountain View Redevelopment Plan Jacobs and Smith
Real Estate Services
for Clayton County
December
2014
Craft an updated and visionary redevelopment strategy for the Mountain View
area. This study builds on the Mountain View Redevelopment Plan of 2007.
▪ Due to FAA restrictions and zoning, no residential property is in the study area,
so all workers must commute in. Approximately 4,400 workers were employed
in the study area in 2010, and forecasts to increase to 8,800 by 2040
▪ Mountain View is a unique development opportunity with access to rail, two
interstates, and HJAIA
▪ The C.W. Grant Parkway and Conley Road project (completion 2018) will
improve access and positively impact industrial development in the area
▪ A bus transfer station/future commuter rail station is recommended in the
northwest quadrant of the relocated Conley Road/Old Dixie Road intersection
▪ North of and adjacent to the transfer station/future commuter rail station is a
recommended MARTA expansion area
▪ A transit connection to the airport is proposed along C.W. Grant Parkway
▪ Special attention should be given to providing pedestrian linkages between
future development and MARTA stops along with the future bus transfer station
▪ Continue supporting MARTA rail extension
▪ Coordinate with MARTA on bus service enhancements as the area redevelops
Mountain View
Redevelopment Plan
Redevelopment Plan Redevelopment
Authority of Clayton
County, Clayton
County Department
of Economic
Development, and
May 2007 Create a transit oriented district centered on the Southern Crescent Transportation
Service Center, a multi-modal facility integrating commuter rail, MARTA, local
buses and shuttles with the HJAIA International Terminal
▪ Opportunity for transit-oriented development and mixed use.
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
33 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
STUDY TITLE STUDY TYPE PREPARED BY DATE
COMPLETED PURPOSE AND FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS
Huntley Partners, Inc.
for Clayton County Update Prepared by the Redevelopment Authority of Clayton County with
assistance from Clayton County Department of Economic Development and
Huntley Partners, Inc. May 2007 This area, including what was formerly the City of
Mountain View in Clayton County, has been transformed due to the dramatic
growth of the Hartsfield- Jackson Atlanta International Airport. In response to the
growth/change, the Mountain View Redevelopment Plan is continuously updated
to guide and control development in order to avoid undesirable and incompatible
land uses in the Atlanta Tradeport, East Mountain View and Ballard Road areas.
▪ Land use and transportation concepts are presented by the plan
▪ The transportation recommendations for the East Mountain View area includes:
▪ Extension of C.W. Grant Parkway eastward from Old Dixie Highway to meet
Conley Road west of I-285
▪ Improve the new intersection of Old Dixie Highway and Grant Parkway (Aviation
Boulevard) by re-routing Old Dixie Highway to the east to intersect Grant
Parkway at grade level
▪ Upgrade and improve Gilbert Road north of the Grant Parkway extension to
connect with and extend the Southwoods Business Center road
▪ Cooperate with the planning efforts of the Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta
International Airport Master Plan and the Southern Crescent Transportation
Service Center Feasibility Study
South Fulton CID
Multimodal
Transportation Study
Cambridge
Systematics for
South Fulton CID
South Fulton CTP
ARCADIS
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
34 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
STUDY TITLE STUDY TYPE PREPARED BY DATE
COMPLETED PURPOSE AND FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS
Southside Hartsfield
Redevelopment and
Stabilization Plan
Redevelopment Plan Clayton County May 2003 Create a master plan for redevelopment around Hartsfield Jackson Atlanta
International Airport
▪ Encourages commercial redevelopment adjacent to the south side of the airport
▪ Neighborhood stabilization efforts are directed at residential areas to the south
of the airport and commercial area
Southside Hartsfield Redevelopment and Stabilization Plan, Recommendations
Summary (Draft) Prepared for the Clayton County Development Authority May
2003 The Southside Hartsfield Redevelopment and Stabilization Plan is a joint
effort of the Development Authorities of Clayton and Fulton Counties and the City
of College Park. The redevelopment plan is prepared for a 3,400-acre area south
of Hartsfield-Jackson Airport. The plan emphasizes the opportunity to develop
business activity centers adjacent to a major hub airport
The Southside Hartsfield Redevelopment and Stabilization Plan recommends
numerous strategies, including:
▪ The development of a greenway trail system between Clayton County and
Fulton County, connecting residential neighborhoods with Flat Shoals Park,
schools, commercial districts along Phoenix Boulevard, Riverdale Road and Old
National Highway
▪ Conducting a traffic study to determine the potential impacts of the Sullivan
Road realignment on redevelopment plans for other areas, including Riverdale
Road, West Fayetteville Road, and other facilities
▪ Developing a network of roads and development blocks along the Godby Road
corridor
▪ Establishing an east-west connection from West Fayetteville Road to Old
National Highway using East Pleasant Hill Road and Pleasant Hill Road
▪ Coordinating with Hartsfield Airport planners to establish a direct road link from
West Fayetteville Road to new airport terminal access roads
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
35 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
STUDY TITLE STUDY TYPE PREPARED BY DATE
COMPLETED PURPOSE AND FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS
▪ Working with Hartsfield Airport planners to establish a preferred route from
planned air cargo facilities to industrial and distribution redevelopment on the
east side in the Cherry Hills area
▪ Encouraging the long-term extension of MARTA rail beyond the airport to serve
areas south of I-285 and to enhance transit-oriented development potential in
the Southside Hartsfield area
▪ The plan also calls for upgrading non-transportation infrastructure (water,
sewer, telecommunications, etc.) to support redevelopment
APPENDIX: SHUTTLES Parking Shuttles
West Terminal 11:15a - 12:15p
Vendor Destination Shuttles Frequency
Avistar 3802 Washington Rd, East Point, GA 30344 5 12
Parking Spot 1 2741 Camp Creek Pkwy, Atlanta, GA 30337 10 6
Pre-Flight 4000 Global Gateway Connector, College Park, GA 30337 11 5
Park-n-Fly 3950 Conley St, College Park, GA 30337 3 20
Park-n-Ticket 3945 Conley St, College Park, GA 30337 7 9
Park-n-Fly Plus 2525 Camp Creek Pkwy, College Park, GA 30337 7 9
Peachy 3100 Sylvan Road, Atlanta, GA 30354 11 5
Elite Airport Parking 3151 Camp Creek Pkwy, East Point, GA 30344 2 30
Wally Park 3889 Herschel Rd, College Park, GA 30337 4 15
Parking Spot 2 3600 N Desert Dr SW, East Point, GA 30344 8 8
Park ATL Park-Ride Lots A and C 16 4
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
36 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
International Terminal 1:00p - 2:00p
Vendor Destination Shuttles Frequency
Fast Park 251 Charles W. Grant Pkwy, Atlanta, GA 30354 12 5
Peachy 3100 Sylvan Road, Atlanta, GA 30354 6 10
Park ATL Maynard H Jackson Jr. Blvd and North Loop Rd. 16 4
Hotel Shuttles West Terminal 2:15p - 3:15p
Hotel Destination Shuttles Frequency
Homewood Suites 3405 Bobby Brown Pkwy, East Point, GA 30344 4 15
Hyatt Place North 3415 Norman Berry Dr, East Point, GA 30344 4 15
Holiday Inn Express 4601 Best Rd, College Park, GA 30337 2 30
Westin 4736 Best Rd, College Park, GA 30337 6 10
Marriott Courtyard South 2050 Sullivan Rd, College Park, GA 30337 6 10
Quality Inn South 2480 Old National Pkwy, College Park, GA 30349 2 30
Hilton Garden Inn 3437 Bobby Brown Pkwy, East Point, GA 30344 2 30
Howard Johnson/LaQuinta 1551 Phoenix Blvd College Park, GA 30349 4 15
Crowne Plaza 1325 Virginia Ave, College Park, GA 30344 4 15
Doubletree 3400 Norman Berry Dr, College Park, GA 30344 2 30
Holiday Inn Airport South 4669 Airport Blvd, College Park, GA 30337 2 30
Renaissance/Fairfield One Hartsfield Center Pkwy, Atlanta, GA 30354 6 10
Staybridge Suites 3420 Norman Berry Dr, Hapeville, GA 30354 2 30
Hilton Airport 1031 Virginia Ave, Atlanta, GA 30354 6 10
Embassy Suites 4700 Southport Rd, College Park, GA 30337 2 30
Country Inn & Suites (north) 1365 Hardin Ave, East Point, GA 30344 2 30
Country Inn & Suites (south) 5100 W. Fayetteville Rd, College Park, GA 30349 2 30
Comfort Inn 5087 Clark Howell Hwy, College Park, GA 30349 4 15
La Quinta (north) 1200 Virginia Ave, College Park, GA 30344 2 30
La Quinta (south) 4820 Massachusetts Blvd, College Park, GA 30337 2 30
Holiday Inn Airport North 1380 Virginia Ave, College Park, GA 30344 2 30
VHB | Aerotropolis Transit Feasibility Study
37 Technical Memorandum 2 – Existing Conditions
Ramada Plaza 5010 Old National Hwy, College Park, GA 30349 4 15
Red Lion 1419 Virginia Ave, College Park, GA 30337 2 30
Best Western Plus - Fairburn 301 N Central Ave, Hapeville, GA 30354 2 30
Motel 6 1377 Virginia Ave, East Point, GA 30344 2 30
Hotel Indigo 1776 Harvard Ave, College Park, GA 30337 2 30
International Terminal 1:00p - 2:00p
Hotel Destination Shuttles Frequency
Hilton 1031 Virginia Ave, Atlanta, GA 30354 2 30
Other Shuttles International Terminal 1:00p - 2:00p
Vendor Destination Shuttles Frequency Domestic to International Domestic Terminal West to International Terminal loop 10 6
ABM Employee Lot 3 Airport Loop Rd and S Cargo Dr Atlanta GA 30337 10 6