6
1 Identifying the Taste of Fat David W. Pittman, Ph.D. Department of Psychology Wofford College Does fat have a taste? Why do we prefer to eat fatty foods? Is there a difference between fat-free and regular fat food products? Common experience suggests that there is a taste component to fat. Fat has been relegated to a role in texture perception rather than taste. Brief Background on the Taste (Gustatory) System Four generally accepted classifications of taste stimuli: SWEET, SOUR, SALT, BITTER UMAMI – monosodium glutamate Based on the ability of chemicals to activate neural signals in particular gustatory nerves Temperature (thermal or chemical: capsaicin), texture, viscosity, etc. are considered general sensory properties Stimulus Interaction with Taste Receptor Cells Enzymes in saliva break down food into dissolved chemicals in the oral cavity Chemicals interact w/ taste receptor cells Neural signal sent to the brain Chemical Transduction Taste Cell DEPOLARIZATION (+) equals neural signal to the brain Neural Signaling & Areas of the Central Nervous System 3 taste nerves converge in the brainstem Insula = quality of taste Areas for other sensations related to taste such as hunger, pleasure, and aversive

Taste of Fat - Wofford Collegewebs.wofford.edu/pittmandw/fat/fat2.pdf · such as hunger, pleasure, and aversive. 2 Does fat have a taste and not just a texture component? ... ingestion

  • Upload
    vuongtu

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1

Identifying the Taste of Fat

David W. Pittman, Ph.D.Department of Psychology

Wofford College

Does fat have a taste?

• Why do we prefer to eat fatty foods?

• Is there a difference between fat-free and regular fat food products?

• Common experience suggests that there is a taste component to fat.

• Fat has been relegated to a role in texture perception rather than taste.

Brief Background on the Taste (Gustatory) System

• Four generally accepted classifications of taste stimuli: SWEET, SOUR, SALT, BITTER– UMAMI– monosodium glutamate

• Based on the ability of chemicals to activate neural signals in particular gustatory nerves

• Temperature (thermal or chemical: capsaicin), texture, viscosity, etc. are considered general sensory properties

Stimulus Interaction with Taste Receptor Cells

• Enzymes in saliva break down food into dissolved chemicals in the oral cavity

• Chemicals interact w/ taste receptor cells

• Neural signal sent to the brain

Chemical Transduction

Taste Cell

DEPOLARIZATION (+) equals neural signal to the brain

Neural Signaling & Areas of the Central Nervous System

• 3 taste nerves converge in the brainstem

• Insula = quality of taste

• Areas for other sensations related to taste such as hunger, pleasure, and aversive

2

Does fat have a taste and not just a texture component?

• Jim Smith at Florida State University

• Can rats discriminate between corn oil and mineral oil?– Similar texture– Different chemical

composition

Rats can detect a difference between

corn oil & mineral oilData from: Smith JC, Fisher EM, Maleszewski V, McClain B. Orosensory factors in the ingestion of corn oil/sucrose mixtures by the rat. Physiol Behav . 2000 Apr 1-15;69(1 -2):135 -46.

What chemicals in corn oil could be taste stimuli?

• Fat is composed of combinations of fatty acids• When fat is broken down *enzymes in saliva*

these free fatty acids become available for chemical stimulation.

• What is the free fatty acid composition of corn oil?

15231313Corn Oil

LinolenicLinoleicOleicStearicPalmitic

Can rats detect linoleic acid?

Conditioned Taste AversionA simple paradigm for powerful results!

NaCl

LiCl

Measure the Taste Aversion with a 2-bottle preference test

<50% = avoidance of LA compared to H2O>50% = preference of LA compared to H2O

• Measure intake by difference in bottle weight

• Preference score = LA / (LA + H2O)

• 50% = equalconsumption

Detection of Linoleic Acid

44 66 88Linoleic Acid Concentration (micromolar)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Pre

fere

nce

Sco

re

LiClNaCl

Detection of Linoleic Acid

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

44 66 88Linoleic Acid Concentration (micromolar)

Pre

fere

nce

Sco

re

LiClNaCl

3

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

44 66 88Linoleic Acid Concentration (micromolar)

Pre

fere

nce

Sco

re

LiClNaCl

Detection of Linoleic Acid

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

44 66 88Linoleic Acid Concentration (micromolar)

Pre

fere

nce

Sco

re

LiClNaCl

* *

Detection of Linoleic Acid

To Summarize Experiment 1:

• Rats can detect Linoleic Acid!• The threshold for detection is between 44 & 66

micromolar concentration (14 ul / 1 liter)• Small concentration similar to the amount

that could be produced by saliva enzymes!

Gustatory Neural Pathways

• CT = anterior 2/3 tongue

• GL = posterior 1/3 tongue

• GSP = palate• Converge in the

NST to CNS taste areas

The Role of the Chorda Tympani Nerve

• 88 µM Linoleic Acid conditioned taste aversive test• ShamCTX = surgery to expose but not cut the CT• CTX = bilaterally cut CT – eliminates taste neural

signals from anterior 2/3 of tongue

• CTX shows an aversive then GL or GSP nerves transmit gustatory signals for detection of Linoleic Acid

• CTX does not show an aversive then the chorda tympani transmits necessary gustatory signals for detecton of Linoleic Acid

The Role of the CT Nerve

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

LiCl & CTX(n=10)

NaCl & CTX(n=5)

LiCl &ShamCTX

(n=5)

NaCl &ShamCTX

(n=5)

Pre

fere

nce

Sco

re

*

4

The Role of the CT Nerve

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

LiCl & CTX(n=10)

NaCl & CTX(n=5)

LiCl &ShamCTX

(n=5)

NaCl &ShamCTX

(n=5)

Pre

fere

nce

Sco

re

*

To Summarize Findings:

• Rats prefer fat (corn oil) similar to humans.• Rats detect & avoid very low concentrations of

Linoleic Acid, a free fatty acid component of corn oil.

• Rats without a chorda tympani nerve can not detect & avoid Linoleic Acid.

• Rats can taste Linoleic Acid and the signal is likely sent through the chorda tympani nerve!

Gilbertson recorded from taste receptor cells while applying free fatty acids.

Taste Cell

DEPOLARIZATION (+) equals neural signal to the brain

Linoleic Acid

Gilbertson’s Data

• Linoleic acid and other related free fatty acids inhibited the Shaker Kv1.5 channel

• Linoleic acid enhanced stimulus -induced depolarization of the taste receptor cell

Data from: Gilbertson TA, et al. Fatty acid modulation of K+ channels in taste receptor cells: gustatory cues for dietary fat. Am J Physiol. 1997 Apr;272(4 Pt 1):C1203-10.

What effect does Linoleic Acid have on other tastes in an intact animal model?

• Controlled presentation of up to 16 bottles

• Computer controls shutter access & counts licks

• The Davis Rig

0

20

40

60

80100

120

140

160

16 31 63 125 250Sucrose Concentration (mM)

Mea

n Li

cks

/ 20

s

Sucrose

Sucrose + 88 uM Linoleic

Effect of 88 µM Linoleic Acid on Sweet Taste

5

Effect of 88 µM Linoleic Acid on Sweet Taste

0

20

40

60

80100

120

140

160

16 31 63 125 250Sucrose Concentration (mM)

Mea

n Li

cks

/ 20

s

Sucrose

Sucrose + 88 uM Linoleic

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

31 63 125 250 500 1000NaCl Concentration (mM)

Tas

tant

/ W

ater

Rat

io

NaCl

NaCl + 88 uM LinoleicAcid

Effect of 88 µM Linoleic Acid on Salt Taste

Effect of 88 µM Linoleic Acid on Salt Taste

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

31 63 125 250 500 1000NaCl Concentration (mM)

Tas

tant

/ W

ater

Rat

io

NaCl

NaCl + 88 uM LinoleicAcid

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

2 4 8 15 30 60Citric Acid Concentration (mM)

Tas

tant

/ W

ater

Rat

ioCitric Acid

Citric Acid + 88 uM LinoleicAcid

Effect of 88 µM Linoleic Acid on Sour Taste

Effect of 88 µM Linoleic Acid on Sour Taste

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

2 4 8 15 30 60Citric Acid Concentration (mM)

Tas

tant

/ W

ater

Rat

io

Citric Acid

Citric Acid + 88 uM LinoleicAcid

Effect of 88 µM Linoleic Acid on Bitter Taste

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1 2 4 8 15 30

Quinine-HCl Concentration (mM)

Tas

tant

/ W

ater

Rat

io

QHCl

QHCl + 88 uM LinoleicAcid

6

To summarize the Davis Rig experiment results:

• Linoleic Acid increased intake of preferable solutions: Sweet / Sucrose

• Linoleic Acid decreased intake of unpleasant solutions: Salt / NaCl & Sour / Citric Acid

• Supported Gilbertson’s theory that Linoleic Acid inhibition of the K+ channels would increase the intensity of taste stimuli

The Taste of Fat• Fat acts on the taste system through its free

fatty acid components.• Linoleic Acid by itself can be detected by rats.• When mixed with other tastes, Linoleic Acid

acts to increase the intensity of taste in rats.

Future Directions:• Identifying the detection abilities of rats for other

free fatty acids such as palmitic and oleic acid• Identifying the neural coding for the detection of

linoleic acid in the chorda tympani nerve• Increasing the concentration of linoleic acid or

using other free fatty acids with tastant intake• Appling this rodent model to human

detection and perception of free fatty acidsThis presentation & more information available at:

http://FatTaste.OnTheWeb.nu

Acknowledgements:FUNDING:

Independent Colleges & Universities of South Carolina (ICUSC)

Committee on Non-Curricular ConcernsDr. Dan Maultsby, Dean of the College

This presentation & more information available at:

http://FatTaste.OnTheWeb.nu

Acknowledgements:STUDENTS:

Research Assistants: Danielle McCormack and Petra Herzog

Krysta WebsterFall 2003 Senior Thesis Group:

Sallie Cheek, Steven Robinson, & Dylan Scott

This presentation & more information available at:

http://FatTaste.OnTheWeb.nu

Free Fatty Acids: the Taste of Fat