TCTW Winter ConferenceJanuary, 2014

Dave Leavitt: SREB/TCTWHeather Snyder, Lois Richards, Steve Walk, Lamar Snyder, Michael

Curley: CTDSL’s

Retirement – Lost Knowledge – Using Expertise◦ Heather Snyder – Retired Assistant Superintendent, Bensalem SD

CTDSL/TAP Project Coordinator Technology Coach and Academics Integration Specialist

◦ Lois Richards – Retired Executive Director, Clearfield CTC Over 30 years of experience Rural CTC expert

◦ Lamar Snyder – Retired Executive Director, Bucks County Technical School (Large Comprehensive CTC) Over 42 years of experience Past leader of PACTA

◦ Steve Walk – Retired Executive Director, Columbia/Montour AVTS Over 40 years of experience Specialist in CTE programming in rural areas

◦ Michael Curley – Retired Executive Director, Lancaster County CTC Over 38 years of experience Specialist in Industry Partnerships, Operating Multiple Campuses, Adult

Education and Workforce Development

Accountability◦ NCLB, Perkins, Chapter 339◦ Employers need for a Skilled Workforce◦ Renewed emphasis on CTE◦ New focus on literacy, math and skill attainment◦All CTCs must Commit to Improve Annually

PDE/PACTA Partnership to make state wide impact◦ Implemented during the 2008 school year◦ Need to change the technical school system from

the “old vo-tech” to the “new CTE”

Changing CTE in PA◦ Enhancing Leadership (PILs)◦ Developing exceptional teaching and learning

(TCTW Workshops)◦ Improving data analysis and year end skill

assessments (NOCTI Blueprints)◦ Improving Instruction (MAX Teaching)◦ Professional learning communities (Virtual

discussions)◦ Changing the CTC Culture (Distinguished School

Leaders)

(SREB) Site development training provides CTC teams with an understanding of the Key Practices, Key conditions and strategies expected of them in implementing the concepts of Technology Centers That Work (TCTW). CTC’s develop a three to five year site plan for implementing the goals and key practices of TCTW at their school.

Focus teams are identified in each CTC with strategies for determining how each team will lead the remainder of the school’s faculty members in implementing the TCTW model.

Seven Essential Skills – Teaching Skills for the 21st Century

Enhanced CTE Assignments – Project Based Learning

Enhanced Numeracy (Creating a school wide numeracy plan)

Literacy Workshops (Creating a school wide literacy plan))

Changing the CTE Culture of Your CTC Coaching & On-site assistance

Provides expertise and leadership to assist CTC’s in identifying instructional or systemic barriers and critical gaps in improving student achievement and then working with school district staff to overcome those barriers and fill those gaps. The CTDSL’s role is flexible in order to meet the unique needs of each CTC.

Coach - Relationship with Administrative Team Assist Administrative Teams in Data Analysis Identification of Root Causes and Identification of

Improvement Strategies Facilitate Resources and Advise on Instructional

Strategies and Special Education Communicate Need for Improvement to Stakeholders

– WIB, Staff, JOC, Home School, Superintendents, IU, etc.

Assist in Building Partnerships that create High Expectations for Teaching and Learning Cultures

Analyze Career Counseling and Pathways Report on Progress and Best Practices

Pre-Assessments, Blueprints and Study Guides provide data to assist instructors and students in identifying strengths and gap areas that need further remediation.

Targeting curriculum areas for remediation will ultimately improve student performance on the end-of-year occupational assessment.

Max Teaching with Reading and Writing illustrates teaching strategies related to literacy for implementation into all instructional environments and in particular the CTC classroom.

These strategies address current literacy deficiencies of the student population.

Training in 22 teaching strategies Modeling in the CTE classroom

TOPIC AREASNOCTI Improving Literacy & Numeracy (Data Driven)Special Education Standards Aligned System Curriculum LeadershipSTEM and CTE Teacher Effectiveness – New Evaluation System

2012 NOCTIComprehensive CTCs 78.1%Occupational CTCs 87.5%High School Programs 72.0%Overall 83.4%

2011 NOCTIComprehensive CTCs 77.0%Occupational CTCs 82.2%High School Programs 63.3%Overall 77.7%

2010 NOCTI Comprehensive CTCs 69.0%Occupational CTCs 73.5%High School Programs 59.7%Overall 70.1%

2009 NOCTI Comprehensive CTCs 58.7%Occupational CTCs 66.9%High School Programs 50.0%Overall 62.1%

2008 NOCTI Comprehensive CTCs 49.0%Occupational CTCs 58.8%High School Programs 50.1%Overall 55.2%

2007 NOCTI Comprehensive CTCs 54.7%Occupational CTCs 56.1%High School Programs 51.4%Overall 54.7%

2006 NOCTI Comprehensive CTCs 55.0%Occupational CTCs 56.4%High School Programs 53.0%Overall 55.2%

2007 Reading – 11th GradeState Average of All Student Proficiency 65.4%State Average of Career and Technical Education Student Proficiency 41.6% 2007 Math – 11th GradeState Average of All Student Proficiency 53.7%State Average of Career and Technical Education Student Proficiency 29.6% 2008 Reading – 11th GradeState Average of All Student Proficiency 64.7%State Average of Career and Technical Education Student Proficiency 38.8% 2008 Math – 11th GradeState Average of All Student Proficiency 55.9%State Average of Career and Technical Education Student Proficiency 30.7% 2009 Reading – 11th GradeState Average of All Student Proficiency 65.2%State Average of Career and Technical Education Student Proficiency 41.3% 2009 Math – 11th GradeState Average of All Student Proficiency 55.6%State Average of Career and Technical Education Student Proficiency 32.3%

2010 Reading – 11th GradeState Average of All Student Proficiency 67.2%State Average of Career and Technical Education Student Proficiency 43.3% 2010 Math – 11th GradeState Average of All Student Proficiency 59.6%State Average of Career and Technical Education Student Proficiency 35.8% 2011 Reading – 11th GradeState Average of All Student Proficiency 69.1%State Average of Career and Technical Education Student Proficiency 46.0% 2011 Math – 11th GradeState Average of All Student Proficiency 60.3%State Average of Career and Technical Education Student Proficiency 36.8%

 2012 Reading – 11th GradeState Average of All Student Proficiency 67.8%State Average of Career and Technical Education Student Proficiency 45.4% 2012 Math – 11th GradeState Average of All Student Proficiency 60.0%State Average of Career and Technical Education Student Proficiency 36.3%

Increase Academic and Occupational Achievement and Success for All CTE Students – using Continuous Improvement Strategies through SREB/TCTW and the Experience of Proven Leaders!!!!

Questions??????

For more Information, contact Dave Leavitt at dave.leavitt1@gmail.com and/or Jackie Cullen at

jackie@pacareertech.org