Click here to load reader
Upload
gazzjazz
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
n
Citation preview
Prior to enrolling in the Masters of Performance Teaching, if I were
propositioned with the question of ‘why’ I taught, my answer would have
undoubtedly related to the financial incentives. Teaching seemed like a natural
progression, something you did to supplement your income as a performer.
However, throughout this degree I have come to realise and appreciate the role
in which music education and in particular, instrumental music education, can
play in the propagation of the value of music, the preservation of musical ideals
and practices and the enhancement of people’s lives. Although it is beyond the
scope of this essay to offer a fully functioning philosophy of teaching, the act of
contemplating ‘why’ I teach has broadened my understanding of the nature of
performance, aesthetics and the justification for their inclusion into an
educational curriculum.
If the question of ‘why’ I teach is to be based on the assertion that a philosophy is
the sustained, systematic, and critical examination of belief (Alperson, 1993),
then I must firstly explain what my beliefs are. These beliefs encompass
education, the role of music in general, the significance of aurally transmitted
genres, creating musical educational opportunities for rural communities and
the rationale for focusing specifically on instrumental music teaching. The
importance of education is the way in which human thought; beliefs, ideals and
practices are articulated, preserved and transmitted from one generation to
another (Alperson, 2010). Music education not only transmits and preserves
information to subsequent generations; it enhances people’s lives and gives
complementary or alternate meaning to experiences (Leonhard & House, 1959).
Music hosts a multitude of roles as highlighted by Alan Merriam’s list of the ‘ten
functions of music,’ which amongst other functions include: aesthetic enjoyment,
emotional expression, entertainment and contribution to the continuity and
stability of culture (as cited in Alperson, 1993). Instrumental music can provide a
unique insight into the embodied meaning of music as well as enhancing the
aesthetic experience (Elliot, 1993). As well as stating my beliefs, it is pertinent to
establish my goals, which are, to elevate the standard and perceptions of
contemporary guitar within the general populace and formal education
institutions; promote/foster aesthetic appreciation amongst music learners; and
provide opportunities for people residing in rural communities to have access to
quality music education.
Through learning to teach and the act of teaching others, I have been able to
develop intelligent approaches to my own practice; gain a sense of fulfilment by
sharing my experience and expertise with others; and preserve and promote
musical traditions found in 20th century American music within Australia.
Music performance has played a pivotal role within my own life, and through
teaching, I have had the opportunity to explore alternate avenues for enjoyment,
intellectual stimulus and the acquisition of knowledge.
I believe music performance represents a particular form of knowledge that is
often overlooked in favour of more conventional descriptions of cognition.
Conventionally, emphasis has been placed on ‘declarative’ knowledge, which is
based on the notion that knowledge is a purely mental phenomenon, which can
only be expressed verbally or through symbolic representation (Elliot, 1993).
Reimer (2009), who lists notation as one of the key “understandings to be
developed as required to become a competent performer”, echoes this focus on
symbolic representations. David Elliot (1993) offers an alternative source of
knowledge and understanding that he terms ‘procedural’, which is defined as
‘knowing how’ as opposed to ‘knowing that’. The essence of Elliot’s contention is,
‘procedural’ knowledge consists of thought-‐full, intentional, practical based
manifestations of cognition that are non-‐verbal. This is one of my personal
rationales for teaching instrumental music as opposed to classroom music. Music
performance is a demonstration of cognition and knowledge through action, as
opposed to verbal and symbolic representations (Elliot, 1993). This has
particular significance for contemporary genres such as Blues, Country and Jazz,
as they are traditionally aurally transmitted. For example, saxophonist Gerry
Bergonzi recalls a rehearsal with jazz pianist Dave Brubeck. When Bergonzi
asked Brubeck the chord he was playing, he responded, “it’s a D7”, when the
chord was actually a Dm7b5 (Jazz Heaven, 2011). This illustrates that although
Brubeck had a very high level of performance and improvisatory skill, he did not
associate a conventional symbolic or verbal representation to sound.
Furthermore, it is often difficult to align contemporary styles with more
conventional notions of knowledge demonstration and transfer, such as written
examinations and verbal descriptions. This is due to the stylistic feature found in
contemporary styles such as Blues and Country being difficult, if not impossible
to accurately represent with notation or written word. Having recognised that
‘procedural’ knowledge is of equal significance in music performance and
education, my own teaching is driven by a desire to assist in the appreciation of
aurally transmitted, practical based knowledge/learning. Although there is a
significant lack of focus on genres such as Blues and Country in formal education
institutions, I believe that both are complex and valid art forms that demand
significant investigation. A major motivation for teaching instrumental music is
to assert the notion, that aurally transmitted genres are valid vehicles for
learning, deserving of serious study and are music of quality. Over the longer
term, through my teaching I hope to elevate perceptions of contemporary music
to that of the same levels of classical music.
I strongly believe in the unique nature of the experience one can elicit through
music performance, and it’s among my goals as a teacher to be active in
increasing the depth of experience for instrumental learners. Throughout much
of my teaching I have witnessed an overwhelming emphasis placed on the
execution of the notated page and the development of technique. This
observation is supported by Bennet Reimer (1989), who states, “the major effort
of children involved in performance is expended on skill development and the
major focus of teaching is typically on this matter of technique.” Students whose
primary learning focus is driven purely by completing grades, perfect execution
etc., are missing out on a deeper, some might say, more profound musical
experience. Although I am coming dangerously close to a pedagogical argument,
my own teaching is resolutely motivated by the desire to assist learners’ develop
musical understanding and sensitivity to aesthetic experience through music
performance. The importance of education as aesthetic education has begun to
permeate my own reasons for teaching. In developing aesthetic awareness, I am
able to assist in heightening student’s ability to perceive, reflect and find new
meaning in experience (Reimer, 2009). In the book Foundations and Principles of
Music Education Charles Leonhard and Robert House (1959) describe music as “a
vehicle by which other men can find additional meaning in experience and
undergo new experience”. Increasing aesthetic awareness not only provides a
deeper musical understanding and enhances enjoyment, it serves to strengthen
the status and role of music performance in education. Music performance has
begun to be viewed as dispensable, in favour of new technological advancements
as the primary source of musical experience. Technology has also reduced
composer’s reliance on performers to realise their musical ideas (Reimer, 2009).
I believe the decline in the prevalence and engagement in music performance
would be detrimental to the global musical culture. Without music performance
we are denying students and the public one of the essential components of
aesthetic education (Reimer, 2009), as well as losing our profession. Upholding
the value of music performance when confronted with its potential decline
should be at the forefront of all teaching philosophy. This is also another
rationale for promoting the inclusion of aurally based music traditions, and why
it is included in my teaching philosophy. Reimer (2009) argues that within
“musical cultures that depend on aural transmissions of music; that is, cultures
in which the function of the composer and performer are not separate,
performance has been and will remain the essential musical creative act.”
Learning a musical instrument to any considerable level of ability has long been
regarded as ‘hard manual labour’ or ‘arduous’. Many regard the activity of
practice and the process of cultivating proficiency and musical ideas on one’s
instrument as being void of aesthetic enjoyment (Reimer, 1989). I believe that
the process of unlocking the interworking of music can be just as aesthetically
pleasing and enhance the overall musical experience. Although this idea is not
fully formed I do believe there is some evidence to support my assumption.
Practical experiences can also be aesthetic in nature when, one “is conscious of
the results, and anticipates the consumption of his experience” (Leonhard &
House, 1959). Personally, I revel in the ‘process’ and feel that it heightens my
musical experience. Through my teaching I wish to share this appreciation for
the ‘process’ not only to increase peoples enjoyment of music, but also to
strengthen the role music performance plays as a source for musical experience.
For the most part, the reasons why I teach are based on values and principles
that are intrinsic to music. However, part of my personal rational for teaching
does include social and communal considerations. I grew up in an area of
Australia that could at best be described as a ‘cultural wasteland’ where there
was little exposure to musical experience. My school music program was
minimal and there were no community-‐based activities that fostered any sort of
creative practice. I believe that my musical development and my capacity for
leading a healthy musical life, one that included an aesthetic appreciation and a
comprehensive musical understanding, was severely stunted for a considerable
amount of time as a result of poor teaching and opportunities. A large part of
why I teach is out of a belief that everyone is entitled to have access to a quality
music education. I enjoy recognising and supporting talented performers as well
as providing genuine and meaningful musical opportunities that can engage the
entire community. As well as working with younger students, I have a keen
interest in adult music learners. Most learners cease playing an instrument after
the completion of high school, when the social reinforcement is no longer
available (Reimer, 1989). I believe creating opportunities for adult learners to
continue enjoying music, within an environment that is conducive to learning
can provide music performance with a longer lasting value. I would eventually
like to take the skills, expertise and passion that I have acquired throughout my
musical life and provide rural communities with the musical education that I
wish I had received.
Until recently, the question of ‘why’ I teach instrumental music was a line of
enquiry that I had given minimal thought. Upon further reflection I have come to
realise the significance teaching has in the upholding of my values, beliefs and
future ambitions in regard to music. Instead of teaching being an activity of
necessity, something that is secondary to my own musical experience, it has
developed into an integral component. Through teaching I have gained an
awareness of the importance of the aesthetic experience and have a deeper
understanding of what constitutes musical understanding. It has led me to
examine the musical values that made me into the musician I am today and given
an insight into the musician I wish to become. The reason I teach is simple, as a
result of helping others enhance their lives through music, my own musical
experience is enriched.
Bibliography
Alperson, P. (1993). What Should One Expect from a Philosophy of Music
Education. In E.R. Jorgenson (Eds.), Philosopher, Teacher, Musician (pp. 215-‐244).
Illinois, U.S.A: University of Illinois Press.
Alperson, P. (2010). Robust Praxialism and the Anti-‐Aesthetic Turn. Philosophy of
Music Education Review, 18(2), 171-‐193.
Elliot, D. (1993). Music as Knowledge. In E.R. Jorgenson (Eds.), Philosopher,
Teacher, Musician (pp. 21-‐40). Illinois, U.S.A: University of Illinois Press.
Jazz Heaven. (2011, September 13). Jerry Bergonzi Interview on playing with
him JazzHeaven.com Excerpt Jazz Saxophone [Video file]. Retrieved from
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xu1owiqghM
Leonhard, C., & House, R. W. (1959). Foundations and Principles of Music
Education. New York, U.S.A: McGraw-‐Hill.
Reimer, B. (2009). Seeking The Significance of Music Education: Essays and
Reflections. Maryland, U.S.A: Rowman and Littlefield Education.
Reimer, B. (1989). A Philosophy of Music Education, second edition. Englewood
Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall