22
College of Southern Maryland EGR 1100 – Introduction to Engineering Professor Fawaz Roumani, Ph.D. & Professor Gobi Gopinath Spring 2015 April 29 th , 2015 TEAM 2 GEORGE JENKINS – PROJECT MANAGER PATRICK SMITH, DEONTE HICKS, TREVIN REAVES MICROCONTROLLER - BASED ROBOTIC CAR

Team 2 Presentation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Team 2 Presentation

College of Southern Maryland

EGR 1100 – Introduction to Engineering

Professor Fawaz Roumani, Ph.D. & Professor Gobi Gopinath

Spring 2015

April 29th, 2015

TEAM 2

GEORGE JENKINS – PROJECT MANAGERPATRICK SMITH, DEONTE HICKS, TREVIN REAVES

MICROCONTROLLER - BASED ROBOTIC CAR

Page 2: Team 2 Presentation

DESIGN PROCESS:DEFINING THE PROBLEM

Page 3: Team 2 Presentation

PROJECT OVERVIEWThe purpose is to design, build, and test a mechanically/electrically driven robotic car, controlled by a microcontroller, which can autonomously navigate a black-line track to the end of a course.

Page 4: Team 2 Presentation

• Must be self contained and portable.

• Safe to operate.

• Power source should be batteries.

• Weigh under 6 pounds.

• Area under 100 in2

• Volume under 600 in3

• Build a quality design that looks professional.

• Follow a 1 inch wide black line for approximately 15 feet.

• Complete the course in under 1 minute.

• Utilize the Arduino-UNO microcontroller.

• Maneuver turns and straight paths.

• Stay within the 6 inch borders of the track.

• Develop a control logic to steer the car.

• Program the microcontroller to control the car.

DESIGN CRITERIA

Page 5: Team 2 Presentation

DESIGN PROCESS:BRAINSTORMING IDEAS

Page 6: Team 2 Presentation

BRAINSTORMING IDEAS

Page 7: Team 2 Presentation

BRAINSTORMING IDEAS

Page 8: Team 2 Presentation

TWO PRELIMINARY DESIGNS4 Motor Design 2 Motor Design

Page 9: Team 2 Presentation

4 MOTOR DESIGN ANALYSIS

Pros:- High speed capability- Efficient- Assessable materialsCons:- Cost- Feasibly- Complexity of program

Page 10: Team 2 Presentation

2 MOTOR DESIGN ANALYSIS

Pros:- Cost- Simplicity- Complexity of programCons:- Less speed capabilities- Efficiency of a pivot wheel

Page 11: Team 2 Presentation

THE INITIAL DESIGN

2 Motor Design

Page 12: Team 2 Presentation

DESIGN PROCESS:DESIGN BUILD AND

EVOLUTION

Page 13: Team 2 Presentation

DESIGN EVOLUTION

• Changed chassis design.

• Changed DC to Continuous Servo Motors.

• 2 brackets to secure motors instead of 1.

• Added wood block to pivot wheel.

• Moved pivot wheel to the back.

• Removed motor shield.

• Added breadboard to design.

• Increased distance between sensors.

Page 14: Team 2 Presentation

THE CAR

Page 15: Team 2 Presentation

AUTOCAD DESIGN

Page 16: Team 2 Presentation

COST ANALYSISPart Retail Price Quantity Used Total Cost Team Cost Source

Chassis $2.50 1 $2.50 $0.00 CSMArduino UNO $6.25 1 $6.25 $0.00 CSMBreadboard $3.59 1 $3.59 $0.00 CSM

Optical Sensor $13.33 2 $26.66 $0.00 CSMContinuous Servo Motor $8.59 2 $17.18 $0.00 CSM

Breadboard Cables $0.06 12 $0.72 $0.00 CSMWheel $1.25 2 $2.50 $0.00 George

Mounting Bracket $0.30 4 $1.20 $0.00 DeontePivot Wheel $1.25 1 $1.25 $1.25 Amazon.com

Fasteners $0.24 12 $2.88 $0.00 Deonte9 Volt Battery $3.49 1 $3.49 $3.49 Walmart.com

9 Volt Battery Adapter $0.60 1 $0.60 $0.00 CSMWood Block $1.89 (1/4) $0.47 $0.00 George

$69.29$4.74

Bill of Materials

Total CostTotal Cost to Team

Page 17: Team 2 Presentation

CIRCUIT DESIGN

Page 18: Team 2 Presentation

THE PROGRAM

Page 19: Team 2 Presentation

DESIGN PROCESS:TESTING AND EVALUATION

Page 20: Team 2 Presentation

TEST RESULTSTrial Time (Seconds)

1 Fail2 Fail3 44.744 43.895 Fail6 Fail7 46.518 45.549 46.02

10 46.4811 45.8912 45.6313 46.3814 46.4615 46.52

Average 45.82

Testing Results

Page 21: Team 2 Presentation

DESIGN EVALUATION• The car was able to stay within the borders of the

track and fully completed the track under a minute.

• The car utilizes Arduino, is safe to operate, and portable.

• The car meets all size requirements by having:- Area of 44 in2 (5.5 in x 8 in)- Volume of 132in3 ( 5.5 in x 8 in x 3 in)- Weight of 1.4 lbs.

• Design meets all the given criteria.

Page 22: Team 2 Presentation

CAR DEMONSTRATION