1
Team 6 Vendor Cart Design By: Andy Lee Mack Burgess Josh Addison Mike Proscia Our team designed and created a cart for impoverished vendors in China to sell their product. We focused on migrant workers in the cities but developed a versatile cart that is usable throughout most areas of China. Any kind of street vendor can use our cart regardless of what he or she is selling. The focus was to create a durable cart and keep the cost as low as possible. 1. Inexpensive 1.1 Under $300 2. Easy to Use 2.1 Easy to Setup 2.2 Easy to Close 2.3 Turn Easily 3. Versatile 3.1 Can hold variety of wares 3.2 Storage Space 3.3 Compatible with many bikes 4. Durable 5. Easy to Store 5.1 Collapsible 5.2 Light Table 1. Hierarchal Customer Needs Table 2. AHP Comparison Chart After conducting research, finding customer needs, and assessing the area for the best and cheapest material, we were able to develop the best possible model for the people. By assessing factors such as climate and available natural resources, we were able to develop a bicycle cart that could efficiently move around most terrains. We also made it versatile in the height and how the shelves can be placed on the bike. We made sure to develop a bike that is long lasting. We tried to make the product affordable for all types of salesman interested in our product. By focusing on keeping all of the goods sold on the cart safe as well as making sure transportation Figure 3. Cart Assembly Conclusion Abstract Picture 1. Chinese City Picture 2. Current Bike Vendor Technology Figure 2. Shelf Design Figure 1. Hitch Inexpensi ve Easy to Use Versat ile Durabl e Easy to store Total Weigh t Inexpensi ve 1 3 1 1 5 11 0.31 Easy to Use 0.33 1 0.5 0.5 2 4.33 0.12 Versatile 1 2 1 1 4 9 0.25 Durable 1 2 1 1 4 9 0.25 Easy to Store 0.2 0.5 0.25 0.25 1 2.2 0.06 Featur e Bike Wagon Ritual Roasters Bike Trailer Intervale Food Hub Pricin g Expensive but longest lasting. Pricing is not given but with materials, appears reasonably priced. Least Expensive. Aesthe tics Dull and boring; minimal color. More colourful but not detailed. Colourful, interesting design, appealing to the eye. Storag e Spacious, may not be big enough for vendor Small but useful design. Collapsible for convenience. Large, aesthetically pleasing, also collapsable. Traile r’s Life Longest lasting material. Nice, compact, nice metal. Hinges may not be strong enough. Cheap and not capable of surviving bad weather. Table 3 - Patents

Team 6 Vendor Cart Design

  • Upload
    doria

  • View
    24

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Team 6 Vendor Cart Design. Abstract. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Team 6 Vendor Cart Design

Team 6 Vendor Cart Design

By:Andy LeeMack BurgessJosh AddisonMike Proscia

Our team designed and created a cart for impoverished vendors in China to sell their product. We focused on migrant workers in the cities but developed a versatile cart that is usable throughout most areas of China. Any kind of street vendor can use our cart regardless of what he or she is selling. The focus was to create a durable cart and keep the cost as low as possible.

1. Inexpensive 1.1 Under $3002. Easy to Use 2.1 Easy to Setup 2.2 Easy to Close 2.3 Turn Easily3. Versatile 3.1 Can hold variety of wares 3.2 Storage Space 3.3 Compatible with many bikes4. Durable5. Easy to Store 5.1 Collapsible 5.2 Light

Table 1. Hierarchal Customer Needs

Table 2. AHP Comparison Chart

After conducting research, finding customer needs, and assessing the area for the best and cheapest material, we were able to develop the best possible model for the people. By assessing factors such as climate and available natural resources, we were able to develop a bicycle cart that could efficiently move around most terrains. We also made it versatile in the height and how the shelves can be placed on the bike. We made sure to develop a bike that is long lasting. We tried to make the product affordable for all types of salesman interested in our product. By focusing on keeping all of the goods sold on the cart safe as well as making sure transportation would be quick and easy, we were able to create a great product that would sell well on the market.

Figure 3. Cart AssemblyConclusion

Abstract

Picture 1.Chinese City

Picture 2. Current Bike Vendor Technology

Figure 2. Shelf DesignFigure 1. Hitch

Inexpensive Easy to Use Versatile Durable Easy to store Total Weight

Inexpensive 1 3 1 1 5 11 0.31

Easy to Use 0.33 1 0.5 0.5 2 4.33 0.12

Versatile 1 2 1 1 4 9 0.25

Durable 1 2 1 1 4 9 0.25

Easy to Store 0.2 0.5 0.25 0.25 1 2.2 0.06

Feature Bike Wagon Ritual Roasters Bike Trailer Intervale Food Hub

Pricing Expensive but longest lasting.

Pricing is not given but with materials, appears reasonably priced.

Least Expensive.

Aesthetics

Dull and boring; minimal color.

More colourful but not detailed. Colourful, interesting design, appealing to the eye.

Storage Spacious, may not be big enough for vendor

Small but useful design. Collapsible for convenience.

Large, aesthetically pleasing, also collapsable.

Trailer’s Life

Longest lasting material. Nice, compact, nice metal. Hinges may not be strong enough.

Cheap and not capable of surviving bad weather.

Table 3 - Patents