Team Code#: 3 - Joy of Tournaments · 2015. 3. 16. · answers on point? Was the cross ﬁre con^cted in a civil manner? ^ • REBUTTAL: Did the debater effectively counter the arguments

P U B L I C F O R U M D e b a t eRound 5 4:30pm Room 1104Pro: 9 Mishra - TingCon: 16 McAvenia - StephanP u b l i c F o r u m

Judge's Name:

P R O :Te a m C o d e # :

Pro Speaker #1_

Pro Speaker #2_

3 _Judge's School Affiliation:

C O N : wTe a m C o d e # : L ?

pts Con Speaker # 1_ Avert,g

pts30_ Con SpeakerPlease award each speaker points based on the following scale: /

30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = VeryGQdd27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for eUmination rounds)

26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor

Towari, Puran (*14)Round 5 4:30pm Room 1104Pro: 9 Mishra - TingCon: 16 McAvenIa - StephanP u b l i c F o r u m

PUBLIC FORUM Debate

Judge's Name:

tirkti* XTeam Code #:

Pro Speaker #2

Judge's School Affiliation: '=-̂C O N :

Team Code #: \C

Con Speaker#! riC

pts Con Speaker #2 pts_2£|_

Please award each speaker points based on the following scale:30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Very Good

27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for elimination rounds)26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor

Ruiz, Michael (MS)Round 5 4:30pm Room 1104Pro: 9 Mishra - TingCon: 16 McAvenia - StephanP u b l i c F o r u m

P R O :Team Code #; ^

P U B L I C F O R U M D e b a t e

Judge's Name:

Judge's School Affiliation: ^^C O N :

Team Code #: / G

Pro Speaker #1

Pro Speaker #2

pts ̂ *"1 Con Speaker #1 ̂ lo ̂P t s C o n S p e a k e r # 2

.pts_^p t s



Xie, Mr. ^2)Round 5 4:30pm Room 1105Pro: 17 Hwang - MasseyCon: 16 Ginsburg - ZhouPublic Forum

Team Code #:P R O :

Pro Speaker #2

PUBLIC FORUM Debate

Judge's Name:

Judge's School AfTiiiation:C O N :

Team Code #:

j t s C o n S p e a k e r

pts Con Speaker #2 &C6K̂ L ,pts_i2Please award each speaker points based on the following sĉ:

30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = ySyGood27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualiĵfor elimination rounds)

26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor

Santhanam, Sathish (*3)Round 5 4;30pm Room 1105Pro: 17 Hwang - MasseyCon: 16 Ginsburg - ZhouP u b l i c F o r u m

Team Code #:

PUBLIC FORUM Debate

Judge's Name: S AT \-\\A 14 '^A Is/TU/l IV A N

Judge's School Affiliation: AfAeiT! lAiAl̂ £clu>o/C O N :

_ T e a m C o d e # : I H

Pro Speaker #2

Jts '2^ Con Speaker #I -Z.IaO U.

Pts 7-2 Con Speaker#2 Gl î 1:>UY(.Pts l3

pts

Please award each speaker points based on the following scale:30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Very Gf̂ d

27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for ©lirnination rounds)26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor

Li, Donna flS)Round 5 4:30j3m Room 1105Pro; 17 Hwang - MasseyCon: 16 Ginsburg - ZhouP u b l i c F o r u m

Team Code #:P R O :

Pro Speaker #I_

Pro Speaker #2

PUBLIC FORUM Debate

Judge's Name: .DQllHrt I

Judge's School Afriliation:_C O N :

Team Code # :

Its ^ Con Speaker #1_ Ue;

pts_23 Con Speaker#2 ̂ ."k cj\j()jrQPlease award each speaker points based on the following ŝ le:

30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28=;veryGood27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qû for elimination rounds)26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor

P R O :

PUBLIC FORUM Debate

Judge's Name:

Judge's School Affiliation: 0Team Code #:

C O N :Team Code #:

Pro Speaker #l_An̂£tf̂Pro Speaker #2_

pts ^ « Con Speaker #1

.Pts23_ Con Speaker #2 ptsPlease award each speaker points based on the following scalê/

30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Ven̂ood27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify M elimination rounds)

26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor

Praharaj, Dillip (*9)Round 5 4:30pm Room 1106Pro: 16 Andrews - JangCon: 14 Donthi - MedaP u b l i c F o r u m

Team Code #:

PUBLIC FORUM Debate

J u d . e s N a . e :

J l l d p f t ' s S r h n n l A fi F i l i a t t r k n -

P R O :

Pro Speaker

Pro Speaker #2

Judge's School Affiliation:,

Team Code #:

pts Con Speaker # 1

pts 7S~I Con Speaker #2

C O N :

A

DoViHii ' p t sPlease award each speaker points based on the following scale:

30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = VeiyGood27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for elimination rounds)

26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor

CJV îKŷ

Round 5 4:30pin Room 1106Pro: 16 Andrews - JangCon: 14 Donthi - MedaP u b l i c F o r u m

Team Code #:

PUBLIC FORUM Debate

Pro Speaker#!

Pro Speaker #2 CXci

Judge's Name: {niihlj

Judge's School Affiliation:^,—

(CON̂Team Code #: ^Pts ̂ 1 Con Speaker # I yi|>pts Con Speaker #2 jPrYl4>

pts 3 ̂pts S ̂


27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for elimination rounds)2̂ -25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor 4- J-i

C o n l : * { > ^frlAiV kA»>tj Ck/dUA]h


Judge's Name:

Judge's School Affiliation:_P R O : C O N :

Te a m C o d e # :

Pro Speaker #1_

Pro Speaker #2_

Team Code #:

/ n ^ I t s C o n S p e a k e r # 1pts ̂ Con Speaker #2 5 ̂

4 i s S O

p t s ^Please award each speaker points based on the following scale: /

30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = VeryGp'od27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for ejimination rounds)

26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor c n < L . c ^ O A . t vXd f«it, N .exiceAJ

Alamedia, Don (*4)Round 6 6;00pm Room 1104Pro : 14 Don th i - MedaCon: 2 Shah - GottiparthyP u b l i c F o r u m

T e a m C o (

Pro Speaker #1


Judge's Name: 3: A--K:Judge's School Affiliation

Team Code #:

ia t ion: O^OcC O N :

Con Speaker #1

ProjSpeaker #2_ Con Speaker #2_

Pleŝ award each speajĵ ef̂ oints based on the following scale: ̂_,.J0̂ êrfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Very Good/27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for elimhmtion rounds)

26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor wins this debate.(PRjborCON)

LuinimrLealigt*16)Round 6 6:00pm Room 1104Pro : 14 Don th i - MedaCon: 2 Shah - GottiparthyP u b l i c F o r u m

Team Code #:


Judge's Name:

Judge's School Affiliation:P R O : C O N :

Pro Speaker #1_

Pro Speaker #2_

I t s

Team Code #:

Con Speaker #1

Con Speaker #2

pts_2if

Pte_A2"

Please award each speaker points based on the following scale:30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Very Good /

27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for elimination rounds)• 26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor

OlUCCKI C ̂Round 6 6:00pm Room 1105Pro: 16 Ginsburg - ZhouCon: 7 Seideman - YangP u b l i c F o r u m

Team Code #:


Judge's Name:

P R O :

Pro Speaker #1 "^nOUL

Pro Speaker #2 Ainchu.!

Judge's School Affiliation: v 1C O N :

Team Code #:

its "JP Con Speaker # 1 S \ nA

pts '%0 Con Speaker #2 ^ a ja ^

Uagnvi ^

1 p t s

ptev̂ 24



i a f ! l l ! 5 A . < a l » ^ i V \ V /Pollak, WilliatriT17)Round 6 6:00pm Room 1105Pro: 16 Ginsburg - ZhouCon: 7 Seideman - YangP u b l i c F o r u m


Judge's Name:_ A / < z r r ' a

Team Code #:

Pro Speaker #1

Pro Speaker iKL

P R O :/ 6

Narayan, Gomathinayagam (*9)Round 6 6;00pm Room 1105Pro; 16 Ginsburg - ZhouCon: 7 Seideman - YangP u b l i c F o r u m

P R O :Team Code #:

Pro Speaker #1

Pro Speaker #2,


J u d g e ' s N a m e : N

Judge's School Affiliation:CON: ^

T e a m C o d e # : 7 ^

) t s Con Speaker #1_

pts ̂ Con Speaker #2 pts 28

Please award each speaker points based on the following scale:30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = VeryGoo^r

27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for eliromation rounds)26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor ^ + C o n l : o o X- r . r a M o c ^ S W : - s i ^ c sfl .

SjvnW)^Prd̂ Ip̂ '02̂ 11̂ 9yi)*C'VU<

PWttonh E^^cWiy pip|to^oaYNtr.2r Car\\j v>^ ^ to c 3

T E A M C O D E # : o n t h e

\ a c V C o n 2 : ^ ;

Z C { K S ^ A

on the PRO wins this debate.(PRO or CON)

REASON FOR DECISION:

V oypDYvoyvhJ k ItsJL \e.ASi\. ^ ■ , :

Santhanam, Sathish f 3)Round 6 6:00pm Room 1106Pro; 9 Mishra - TingCon: 16 Wang - BaumP u b l i c F o r u m


Judge's Name:

P R O :Judge's School Affiliation: Log k. ̂ cUo0 (

C O N :Team Code #: Team Code #:

Pro Speaker #1 M i ̂ r

Pro Speaker #2 T i Tl

Con Speaker #1 VN

p t s C o n

Dts 2-9

p t s


27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for eliminatioprounds)26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor

Shankar, Pranav (*18)Round 6 6:00pm Room 1106Pro: 9 Mishra - TingCon: 16 Wang - BaumP u b l i c F o r u m

P R O :Team Code #:

Pro Speaker #1_

Pro Speaker #2_


Judge's Name:

Judge's School Affiliation: 1 1 V\C O N :

Team Code#: /6

. t e l l Con Speaker #1,

p ts Con Speaker #2_ p t s

Please award each speaker points based on the following scal̂30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Verv̂ood

27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify f̂limination rounds)26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor c . 1

wins th is debate.

Pro 2:

uJOfbJl Ou\ bMrtW )?C

T E A M C O D E # : o n t h e wins th is debate.

(PRO or CON)R E A S O N F O R D E C I S I O N : , . n . U / ' I / ' r J ^ oc W « ^ r r ^ U K c l , < = > I U

, / . U . + , U " ' J j f , , P ^ "

? > V ^ 5 W X ^Io - ^ c u \ U > ' ' L J w . . . w f Y u ^

I s ) K 4 O O ' ^ ^ _ J£ J 1 K^''V P0°' $tV'l«»>-H, > "^/ lMff5oC(^- /„tt:i,r^« ^ ^'''.Tll' -^' r""

c)HjMe oUs-. clJ h "'""j- I A

\/Uo CUia'4-|i5(>r p̂60j/c "\'~*-f̂'̂-

Q o u X ' - ^ = ^ ^ ^ ' , / L - f 7 ~ L ^ t )I I f-f1>-HJ, 1'^l>

Khattar, Mr/Mrs. (*2)Round 6 6:00pm Room 1106Pro: 9 Mishra - TingCon: 16 Wang - BaumP u b l i c F o r u m

Te a m C o d e # :


J u d g e ' s N a m e : 1 ^

Judge's School Affiliation: ">[alleN UiCfH ĉwooLP R O : C O N :

Team Code #:

Pro Speaker #1_

Pro Speaker #2_

pts 2^ Con Speaker #1 M-ftK) Qpts Con Speaker #2 ^ ft ^ r\

pts^-^ ' ^

Please award each speaker points based on the following scale:30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Vei3/̂ood

27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualifŷ elimination rounds)26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor

P U B L I C F O R U M D e b a t eRound 6 6:00pm Room 1107Pro: 14 Nguyen - DoshiCon: 19 Chellani - AhluwaliaPublic Forum

Judge's Name:_

Judge's School Affiliation:.P R O : C O N :

Team Code #:

Pro Speaker #1_

Pro Speaker #2.

Team Code #:

Con Speaker #1_

Con Speaker #2 1Please award each speaker points based on the following scale: ^

30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Very Good27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for elimination rounds)

26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor

Ansel, Shaun (*16)Round 6 6;00pm Room 1107Pro: 14 Nguyen - DoshiCon; 19 Chellani - AhluwaliaPublic Forum


Judge's Name:_


Team Code #:

Pro Speaker #1_

Pro Speaker #2_

Team Code #:

p t s C o n S p e a k e r # 1 p t s

pts Con Speaker #2 A U ^ ptsPlease award each speaker points based on the following scale:

30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = VeryGoo^r27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for elimination rounds)

26

Zhu, Raymond (*7)Round 6 6:00pm Room 1107Pro: 14 Nguyen - DoshiCon: 19 Chellani - AhluwaliaP u b l i c F o r u m

Team Code #:


Judge's Name:

Judge's School Affiliation: n LC O N :

Team Code #: 1 ^

Pro Speaker #2_

Con Speaker #1_

Con Speaker #2_

Please award each speaker points based on the following scale:30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = VeryGoô

27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for duration rounds)26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor

/a C? j

C O N :Team Code #:

Pro Speaker #1_

Pro Speaker #2_

Team Code #:

/)y l/ ̂ pts Con Speaker #1_pts ($?? Con Speaker #2.

Pts ^9

Please award each speaker points based on the following scale: /30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Very Good /

27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for elimination̂unds)26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor

AggarwalrVanita f 9)Round 6 6:00pm Room 1108P r o : 1 4 G a n e s h - A r u nCon: 16 Zheng - MiskelleyPublic Forum


Judge's Name:_

Judge's School Affiliation:,P R O : C O N :

Te a m C o d e

Pro Speaker #1_

Pro Speaker #2_

Team Code #;

r u n Con Speaker #1

Con Speaker #2 N/f i

Please award each speaker points based on the following scale: /30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Very Gewd

27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for eHmination rounds)26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor

Round 6 6:00pm Room 1108P r o : 1 4 G a n e s h - A r u nCon: 16 Zheng - MIskelleyP u b l i c F o r u m

P R O :Team Code #:


Judge's Name:

Judge's School Affiliation:.

Y

C O N :Team Code #:

Pro Speaker#!. Con Speaker #1.

Pro Speaker#2 (r̂ iA>-dŝ pts Con Speaker #2_ pts ̂Please award each speaker points based on the following scale: /

30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Very Good27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for eiimination̂unds)

26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor

Bhamidipati, Lakshmi (*3)Round 6 6;00pm Room 1109Pro: 9 Khan - MacllwaineCon: 16 Ansel - ChowP u b l i c F o r u m

P R O :Team Code #:

Pro Speaker #1_

Pro Speaker #2_


Judge's Name: IJudge's School Affiliation:

C O N :Team Code #:

Wa'Kgpts_2̂ Con Speaker #1,Con Speaker #2_ .pts_Z=S

Please award each speaker points based on the following scale: /30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = VeryĜd

27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for̂mination rounds)26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor -

T ^ w ins th is debate .fPRObrCON)R E A S O N F O R D E C I S I O N : ^ ' r ( I - 4 - , - ^

f \ o - ^ ^ V V ^ A > < ^ ^ I j l ^^ < 2 ^ t — ^u ^ A ^ A fi :

Ly, Denise (*14)Round 6 6:00pm Room 1109Pro: 9 Khan - MacllwalneCon: 16 Ansel - ChowP u b l i c F o r u m

Te a m C o d e # :


Judge's Name:


Team Code #:

Pro Speaker #1_

Pro Speaker #2_

cuMyPts Con Speaker # 1

J p t s C o n S p e a k e r # 2 p t s ^

Please award each speaker points based on the following sc^le:30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Veĵ ôod

27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify fdr elimination rounds)26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor

_Wpna, I ily (*1T)—Round 6 6:00pm Room 1109P r o : 9 K h a n - M a c l l w a i n eC o n : 1 6 A n s e l - C h o wP u b l i c F o r u m


Judge's Name:

Judge's School Affiliation:

Y ^

P R O :Te a m C o d e # : Team Code #:

C O N :

Pro Speaker #1 M-icL I

Pro Speaker #2 IX hPts ̂7 Con Speaker # I C ̂pts Con Speaker #2_ Ar̂

Y Y ipts_i^

Please award each speaker points based on the following scale: /30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Very Gô27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to qualify for elinnnation rounds)

26-25 = Fair 24-20 ^ Poor rr u

TEAM CODE #: iG on the C wins this debate.(PRO or CON)

R E A S O N F O R D E C I S I O N : ^ n

«; . TV 'rf-i-

Documents

Team Code#: 3 - Joy of Tournaments · 2015. 3. 16. · answers on point? Was the cross ﬁre con^cted in a civil manner? ^ • REBUTTAL: Did the debater effectively counter the arguments