26
Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk

Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions

  • View
    215

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions

Team Flow

Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk

Page 2: Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions

Outline

BackgroundPrevious WorkModelingResults and ConclusionsQuestions

Page 3: Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions

FLOW SYSTEM

Flow Background

Storage Tank

Pump

Flow Meter

Page 4: Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions

Flow Background

Input = % motor speed

Output = mass flow rate (lbs/min)

SSOC Operating Range 10% - 90%

Page 5: Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions

SSOC vs. COC

y = 0.64x - 1.12

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 20 40 60 80 100

Input (% motor speed)

Ou

tpu

t (l

b/m

in)

Controller Operating Curve

21 lb/min

30 lb/min

Page 6: Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions

Previous Work

Modeling Step InputFOPDT ModelTransfer Function Parameters

tau=0.4sec K=0.66 (lbs/min)/% to=0.3 sec where

G=(Ke^(to*s))/(tau*s+1)

Page 7: Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions

First Order Step Response

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

15 17 19 21 23 25 27

Time (sec)

% M

oto

r In

pu

t

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Flo

w R

ate

(lbs/

min

)

Input

Experimental Output

Model Output

Page 8: Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions

Previous WorkModeling Sine InputFOPDT ModelTransfer Function Parameters

tau=0.4sec K=0.7 (lbs/min)/% to=0.3 sec

Bode Plots

Page 9: Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions

Frequency response

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

25 30 35 40 45 50

Time (sec)

% IN

PU

T

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

OU

TP

UT

(lb

s/m

in)Delta Y

Delta M

Input

Exp. Output

Model Output

Page 10: Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions

Bode Plots

Two Types

Phase Angle vs Frequency

AR vs Frequency

Page 11: Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions

Bode Plot

-360

-270

-180

-90

0

0.01 0.1 1 10

Frequency (Hz)

Ph

ase

An

gle

Fu

Model

Experimental

Page 12: Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions

Bode Plot

0.1

1

0.01 0.1 1 10

Frequency (HZ)

AR

1/Kcu

Fu

-m = order

ExperimentalModel

Page 13: Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions

Bode Results

Apparent Order is 1.8

Kcu = 2.6 (lbs/min)/%

Fu = 0.8 Hz

Page 14: Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions

Modeling

Root Locus

Page 15: Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions

ROOT LOCUS PLOT

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

-7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0

REAL AXIS

IMA

GIN

AR

Y A

XIS

Ultimate

Critical

Quarter Decay

Page 16: Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions

Theoretical Results

K cd= .22

K qd=3.4

K cu=5.2

Page 17: Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions

Experimental Results

K cd=<.1

K qd=1.6

K cu=2.3

Page 18: Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions

Kcd=.1

17

17.5

18

18.5

19

19.5

20

20.5

21

25 25.5 26 26.5 27 27.5 28 28.5 29 29.5 30

Time (sec)

Lb

/min

Page 19: Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions

Kqd=1.6

20

22

24

26

28

30

32

34

36

38

40

29 29.5 30 30.5 31 31.5 32 32.5 33 33.5 34

Time (sec)

Lb

/min

4.0

1

Page 20: Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions

Verification

1st peak = 4.02nd peak = 1.01/4 = .25 decay

Frequency1/(31.7-

30.5)=.83hz

Page 21: Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions

Kcu=2.3

18

23

28

33

38

57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65

Time (sec)

lb/m

in

5 3.5

Page 22: Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions

Calculations

1st peak=37.5 - 32.5=52nd peak=36-32.5=35Decay=(3.5/5)= .70

Frequency1/(59.2-57.9)

= .77hz

Page 23: Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions

Experimental Results

K cd=<.1

K qd=1.6

K cu=2.3

Page 24: Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions

Discussion

Theory ExperimentalKcd=.22 Kcd<.1

Kqd=3.4 Kqd=1.6

Kcu=5.2 Kcu=2.3

Page 25: Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions

Conclusions

Critical damped Kc value .1

Quarter decay Kc value 1.6

Ultimate Kc value 2.3

Page 26: Team Flow Eric Parker Jason Gunn Nathan Funk. Outline zBackground zPrevious Work zModeling zResults and Conclusions zQuestions

QUESTIONS ?