Upload
paulina-flynn
View
222
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Team Wrecked
Week 7 Deliverables: Mid-Term Presentation
Sponsor
Problem Statement
• There is no device that can return a puck that has been shot on a hockey goal that does not require user interaction
• Other sports have such devices including basketball, baseball, and golf
• The introduction of such a device would increase practice productivity by saving time required to gather pucks from the net
• Solution: A four component system to collect and shoot pucks was developed
Goals• Efficient in returning regulation pucks
• Fit in a regulation hockey goal
• Affordable and safe
• Versatile and durable
Initial Design Solutions
Final Design Solution
• Utilized components from skeet shooter and stopper wall.
Firing Mechanism
Competition (Hockey Shot)
www.hockeyshot.com
Evaluation Matrix
Weight
Hockey S
hot Shooting
System
Modified S
keet Shooter
(Final D
esign)
Stopper W
all (netting back)
Funnel R
eturn
Seesaw
Return
Shove and S
hoot
Raw
Weighted
Raw
Weighted
Raw
Weighted
Raw
Weighted
Raw
Weighted
Raw
Weighted
Easy Setup 0.50 3.2 1.6 8.2 4.1 6.3 3.2 4.7 2.3 4.3 2.2 2.2 1.1
Durable 0.80 7.3 5.8 7.8 6.3 8.7 6.9 7.5 6.0 5.7 4.5 6.3 5.1
Precision 0.40 4.3 1.7 7.0 2.8 6.0 2.4 8.5 3.4 4.8 1.9 3.5 1.4
Safe 1.00 8.3 8.3 7.3 7.3 7.8 7.8 6.7 6.7 5.8 5.8 5.2 5.2
Low Cost 0.30 5.7 1.7 6.2 1.9 6.2 1.9 5.8 1.8 4.3 1.3 3.3 1.0
Non-Distracting 0.10 4.2 0.4 6.0 0.6 7.7 0.8 4.2 0.4 7.0 0.7 6.0 0.6
Versatile 0.50 3.2 1.6 5.3 2.7 9.3 4.7 6.3 3.2 3.8 1.9 5.7 2.8
Portable 0.50 1.3 0.7 5.7 2.8 6.7 3.3 4.8 2.4 4.5 2.3 3.3 1.7
Single Puck Use 0.50 10.0 5.0 7.3 3.7 0.3 0.2 7.3 3.7 4.5 2.3 3.7 1.8
Feasibility 0.90 7.0 6.3 7.2 6.5 3.5 3.2 5.3 4.8 2.5 2.3 1.7 1.5
Total: 54.5 33.1 60.8 38.6 59.0 34.3 55.8 34.6 44.8 25.1 39.2 22.2
Normalized Score: 1.00 1.16 1.03 1.04 0.76 0.67
Questions?