10
Technical Approach – U.S. EPA Emission sampling and wind velocity measurement A 14’ diameter tethered aerostat was used to loft a battery operated instrument package. Real time PM by size Semivolatiles CO2 3D sonic anemometer

Technical Approach – U.S. EPA

  • Upload
    abiba

  • View
    55

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Technical Approach – U.S. EPA. Emission sampling and wind velocity measurement A 14’ diameter tethered aerostat was used to loft a battery operated instrument package. Real time PM by size Semivolatiles CO 2 3D sonic anemometer. RESULTS. Continuous PM and CO 2. Eglin 2/8/2011. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Technical Approach – U.S. EPA

Technical Approach – U.S. EPA

● Emission sampling and wind velocity measurement● A 14’ diameter tethered aerostat was used to loft a

battery operated instrument package. Real time PM by size Semivolatiles CO2 3D sonic anemometer

Page 2: Technical Approach – U.S. EPA

18:0

0

18:1

0

18:2

0

18:3

0

18:4

0

18:5

0

19:0

0

19:1

0

19:2

0

19:3

0

19:4

0

19:5

0

20:0

0

20:1

0

20:2

0

20:3

0

20:4

0

20:5

0

-0.10.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.0 PM 1.0

PM 2.5 PM 7.0 PM 10.0 TSP

PM

Con

cent

ratio

n (m

g/m

3 )

Time (UTC) (HHmm)

050

100150200250300350

Alti

tude

(m)

200250300350400450500550600650700750800

CO2

CO

2 Con

cent

ratio

n (p

pm)

RESULTS. Continuous PM and CO2

Eglin 2/8/2011 2-min running average

Page 3: Technical Approach – U.S. EPA

18:0

0

18:1

0

18:2

0

18:3

0

18:4

0

18:5

0

19:0

0

19:1

0

19:2

0

19:3

0

19:4

0

19:5

0

20:0

0

20:1

0

20:2

0

20:3

0

20:4

0

-0.010.000.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.09

PM

Con

cent

ratio

n (m

g/m

3 ) PM 1.0 PM 2.5 PM 7.0 PM 10.0 TSP

Time (UTC) (HH:mm)

0

100

200

300

Alti

tude

(m) Altitude

Continuous PM

Eglin 2/6/2011 2-min running average

Continuous PM sampler

Page 4: Technical Approach – U.S. EPA

18:0

0

18:1

0

18:2

0

18:3

0

18:4

0

18:5

0

19:0

0

19:1

0

19:2

0

19:3

0

19:4

0

19:5

0

20:0

0

20:1

0

20:2

0

20:3

0

20:4

0

20:5

0

-0.10.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.0

PM

Con

cent

ratio

n (m

g/m

3 ) PM 1.0 PM 2.5 PM 7.0 PM 10.0 TSP

Time (UTC) (HHmm)

050

100150200250300350

Alti

tude

(m)

Continuous PM

Eglin 2/8/2011

2-min average

Page 5: Technical Approach – U.S. EPA

16:4

8

17:1

6

17:4

5

18:1

4

18:4

3

19:1

2

19:4

0

20:0

9

20:3

8

-0.050.000.050.100.150.200.250.300.350.400.450.50

PM

Con

cent

ratio

n (m

g/m

3 ) PM 1.0 PM 2.5 PM 7.0 PM 10.0 TSP

Time (UTC) (HH:mm)

0

100

200

300

400

Alti

tude

(m)

Continuous PM

Eglin 2/12/2011 2-min average

Page 6: Technical Approach – U.S. EPA

18:0

0

18:1

0

18:2

0

18:3

0

18:4

0

18:5

0

19:0

0

19:1

0

19:2

0

19:3

0

19:4

0

19:5

0

20:0

0

20:1

0

20:2

0

20:3

0

20:4

0

0.00

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

385

393

401

409

417

425

433

441

449

PM

2.5 (m

g/m

3 )

PM 2.5

Time (UTC) (HH:mm)

CO2

CO

2 Con

cent

ratio

n (p

pm)

0

100

200

300

Alti

tude

(m) Altitude

Continuous PM2.5 and CO2

Eglin 2/6/2011 2-min average

18:0

0

18:1

0

18:2

0

18:3

0

18:4

0

18:5

0

19:0

0

19:1

0

19:2

0

19:3

0

19:4

0

19:5

0

20:0

0

20:1

0

20:2

0

20:3

0

20:4

0

0.00

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

385

393

401

409

417

425

433

441

449

PM

2.5 (m

g/m

3 )

PM 2.5

Time (UTC) (HH:mm)

CO2

CO

2 Con

cent

ratio

n (p

pm)

0

100

200

300

Alti

tude

(m) Altitude

Page 7: Technical Approach – U.S. EPA

18:0

0

18:1

0

18:2

0

18:3

0

18:4

0

18:5

0

19:0

0

19:1

0

19:2

0

19:3

0

19:4

0

19:5

0

20:0

0

20:1

0

20:2

0

20:3

0

20:4

0

20:5

0

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

385

435

485

535

585

635

685

735

785

PM

2.5 (m

g/m

3 )

PM 2.5

Time (UTC) (HHmm)

CO2

CO

2 Con

cent

ratio

n (p

pm)

0

100

200

300

400

Alti

tude

(m)

Altitude

Continuous PM2.5 and CO2

Eglin 2/8/20112-min average

Page 8: Technical Approach – U.S. EPA

16:4

0

17:0

0

17:2

0

17:4

0

18:0

0

18:2

0

18:4

0

19:0

0

19:2

0

19:4

0

20:0

0

20:2

0

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

385

435

485

535

585

PM

2.5 (m

g/m

3 )

PM 2.5

Time (UTC) (HH:mm)

CO2

CO

2 Con

cent

ratio

n (p

pm)

0

100

200

300

400

Alti

tude

(m)

Continuous PM2.5 and CO2

Eglin 2/12/20112-min average

Page 9: Technical Approach – U.S. EPA

Results

0.013 g/g Carbon ±13% (RPD)

Background correctedPM by weight/filterCarbon from CO2

RPD = Relative Percent Difference (two samples)

PM 2.5 impactor sampler

PM2.5 Emission factor

Other Results Anticipated:• 3D wind velocity over time and altitude• Semi-volatile emission factors

Page 10: Technical Approach – U.S. EPA

Status of Funds for Federal Performers (EPA)

● Report on the status of funds for each MIPR received by a directly funded Federal performer. Provide information on each fiscal year for which there has not been 100% expenditure of funds.

FY200X Funds

Directly Funded Federal Performer(s)

Funds Received Funds Obligated*

Percent Funding Obligated

U.S. Navy (ISSI, Inc. Task Order for U.S. EPA) - Direct Cite MIPR

34.9K 34.9K 100%

U.S. EPA - Reimbursable MIPR

15.1K 11.8K 78%

Federal Performer B - Direct Cite MIPR

100K 100K 100%

Federal Performer B - Reimbursable MIPR

100K 50K 50%

* Funds put on contracts and/or purchase orders that have been issued and funds associated with internal labor or travel expenses that have been incurred.