303
Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers First Draft Meeting July 13 & 14, 2016 San Diego Marriott Mission Valley 8757 Rio San Diego Drive San Diego, CA 92108 AGENDA Wednesday July 13, 2016 1. Call to Order – 8:00 AM 2. Introductions of Members and Staff 3. Review and Approval of A2015 2 nd Draft Meeting Minutes 4. Review of A2018 Revision Cycle and Meeting Schedule 5. Review of Distributed Material and Workload a. Overview of Public Input b. Overview of Potential Committee First Revision 6. Task Group Reports 7. Act on PI’s and Task Group Reports Thursday July 14, 2016 8. Reconvene for Task Group Reports – 8:00AM 9. Residential Sprinkler Report – Robert Solomon Page 1 of 298

Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    6

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers

First Draft Meeting July 13 & 14, 2016

San Diego Marriott Mission Valley

8757 Rio San Diego Drive San Diego, CA 92108

AGENDA

Wednesday July 13, 2016

1. Call to Order – 8:00 AM

2. Introductions of Members and Staff

3. Review and Approval of A2015 2nd Draft Meeting Minutes

4. Review of A2018 Revision Cycle and Meeting Schedule

5. Review of Distributed Material and Workload

a. Overview of Public Input b. Overview of Potential Committee First Revision

6. Task Group Reports

7. Act on PI’s and Task Group Reports

Thursday July 14, 2016

8. Reconvene for Task Group Reports – 8:00AM

9. Residential Sprinkler Report – Robert Solomon

Page 1 of 298

Page 2: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Address List No PhoneResidential Sprinkler Systems AUT-RSS

Automatic Sprinkler Systems

David R. Hague06/30/2016

AUT-RSS

Kenneth E. Isman

ChairUniversity of Maryland7402 Forests Edge CourtLaurel, MD 20707

SE 10/1/1997AUT-RSS

Roland A. Asp

PrincipalNational Fire Sprinkler Association, Inc.40 Jon Barrett RoadPatterson, NY 12563-2164Design TechnicianAlternate: Jon R. Ackley

M 10/28/2014

AUT-RSS

Kerry M. Bell

PrincipalUL LLC333 Pfingsten RoadNorthbrook, IL 60062-2096Alternate: Jeff Hebenstreit

RT 4/15/2004AUT-RSS

Fred Benn

PrincipalAdvanced Automatic Sprinkler, Inc.1947 San Ramon Valley BoulevardSan Ramon, CA 94583Alternate: Dan Mendoza

IM 10/10/1997

AUT-RSS

Jonathan C. Bittenbender

PrincipalREHAU Incorporated1501 Edwards Ferry RoadLeesburg, VA 20176Alternate: David A. Nickelson

M 9/30/2004AUT-RSS

Frederick C. Bradley

PrincipalFCB Engineering9470 Dominion WayAlpharetta, GA 30022-6111

SE 1/16/1998

AUT-RSS

Chase A. Browning

PrincipalMedford Fire Rescue200 South Ivy Street, #180Medford, OR 97501-3100

E 08/17/2015AUT-RSS

Daniel Buuck

PrincipalNational Association of Home Builders1201 15th Street, NWWashington, DC 20005-2800National Association of Home BuildersAlternate: Gary Lampella

U 03/03/2014

AUT-RSS

Thomas G. Deegan

PrincipalViking Group, Inc.3033 Orchard Vista SE, Suite 308Grand Rapids, MI 49546-7077National Fire Sprinkler AssociationManufacturerAlternate: Thomas L. Multer

M 10/10/1997AUT-RSS

Jeffrey Feid

PrincipalState Farm Insurance CompanyOne State Farm Plaza, D-1Bloomington, IL 61710-0001

I 10/20/2010

AUT-RSS

Dawn M. Flancher

PrincipalAmerican Water Works Association6666 West Quincy AvenueDenver, CO 80235American Water Works Association

U 8/9/2011AUT-RSS

Tonya L. Hoover

PrincipalCAL FIRE, Office of the State Fire Marshal1131 “S” StreetPO Box 944246Sacramento, CA 94244-2460Alternate: Ernie Paez

E 3/1/2011

1

Page 3: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Address List No PhoneResidential Sprinkler Systems AUT-RSS

Automatic Sprinkler Systems

David R. Hague06/30/2016

AUT-RSS

Charles W. Ketner

PrincipalNational Automatic Sprinkler Fitters LU 669Joint Apprenticeship & Training Committee7050 Oakland Mills RoadColumbia, MD 20732United Assn. of Journeymen & Apprentices of thePlumbing & Pipe Fitting IndustryAlternate: Timothy J. Skinner

L 1/10/2008AUT-RSS

Ronald G. Nickson

PrincipalNational Multifamily Housing Council3551 White Spruce GlenSouthport, NC 28461-0078Alternate: Marshall A. Klein

U 10/10/1997

AUT-RSS

Michael O'Brian

PrincipalBrighton Area Fire Authority615 West Grand River AvenueBrighton, MI 48116International Association of Fire ChiefsAlternate: Robert S. Blach

E 3/2/2010AUT-RSS

Maurice M. Pilette

PrincipalMechanical Designs Ltd.67 Chouteau AvenueFramingham, MA 01701-4259

SE 4/17/1998

AUT-RSS

Milosh T. Puchovsky

PrincipalWorcester Polytechnic InstituteDepartment of Fire Protection Engineering100 Institute RoadWorcester, MA 01609

SE 8/2/2010AUT-RSS

Peter T. Schwab

PrincipalWayne Automatic Fire Sprinklers, Inc.222 Capitol CourtOcoee, FL 34761-3033Alternate: Bobby A. DiModica

IM 7/29/2005

AUT-RSS

Eric J. Skare

PrincipalUponor, Inc.5925 148th Street WestApple Valley, MN 55124Alternate: Melisa Rodriguez

M 3/4/2009AUT-RSS

George W. Stanley

PrincipalWiginton Fire Protection Engineering, Inc.699 Aero LaneSanford, FL 32771Alternate: Ernesto Rodriguez, Jr.

IM 10/10/1997

AUT-RSS

Michael Towler

PrincipalLegacy Fire Protection Inc.#3 - 7003 30th Street SECalgary, AB T2C 1N6 CanadaCanadian Automatic Sprinkler AssociationAlternate: Jason W. Ryckman

IM 08/17/2015AUT-RSS

Donald R. Townley

PrincipalLubrizol9911 Brecksville RoadCleveland, OH 44141-3201Alternate: Forest Hampton

M 10/23/2013

AUT-RSS

Martin C. W. Trim

PrincipalBarrett Engineered Pumps1695 National AvenueSan Diego, CA 92113-1008American Society of Plumbing EngineersAlternate: Samuel S. Dannaway

SE 8/9/2012AUT-RSS

Ed Van Walraven

PrincipalAspen Fire Protection DistrictPO Box 1455Carbondale, CO 81623Alternate: Katherine M. Clay

E 4/3/2003

2

Page 4: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Address List No PhoneResidential Sprinkler Systems AUT-RSS

Automatic Sprinkler Systems

David R. Hague06/30/2016

AUT-RSS

Terry L. Victor

PrincipalTyco/SimplexGrinnell705 Digital Drive, Suite NLinthicum, MD 21090-2267Alternate: Mark E. Fessenden

M 10/10/1997AUT-RSS

John F. Viola

PrincipalJFV Engineering, LLC10 Chestnut Hill RoadSouth Hadley, MA 01075-1718American Fire Sprinkler AssociationInstaller/MaintainerAlternate: Brent Zimiga

IM 04/05/2016

AUT-RSS

Ronald N. Webb

PrincipalS.A. Comunale Company, Inc.2900 Newpark DriveBarberton, OH 44203National Fire Sprinkler AssociationContractorAlternate: William Roberts

IM 7/29/2005AUT-RSS

Hong-Zeng Yu

PrincipalFM Global1151 Boston-Providence TurnpikePO Box 9102Norwood, MA 02062-9102Alternate: Angele Morcos

I 9/30/2004

AUT-RSS

Bradford T. Cronin

Voting AlternateNewport Fire Department21 West Marlborough StreetNewport, RI 02840-2527

E 8/2/2010AUT-RSS

Daniel J. Mathias

Voting AlternateAbsolute Fire Protection, Inc.836 Ritchie Highway, Suite 1Severna Park, MD 21146-4133American Fire Sprinkler AssociationDesign

IM 04/05/2016

AUT-RSS

Jon R. Ackley

AlternateDalmatian Fire, Inc.5670 West 73rd StreetIndianapolis, IN 46278National Fire Sprinkler AssociationDesign TechnicianPrincipal: Roland A. Asp

M 10/29/2012AUT-RSS

Robert S. Blach

AlternateMenlo Park Fire Protection District170 Middlefield RoadMenlo Park, CA 94025International Association of Fire ChiefsPrincipal: Michael O'Brian

E 3/2/2010

AUT-RSS

Katherine M. Clay

AlternateJackson Hole Fire/EMSPO Box 901Jackson, WY 83001Principal: Ed Van Walraven

E 08/09/2012AUT-RSS

Samuel S. Dannaway

AlternateCoffman Engineers/S. S. Dannaway Associates, Inc.501 Sumner Street, Suite 421Honolulu, HI 96817-5304American Society of Plumbing EngineersPrincipal: Martin C. W. Trim

SE 08/11/2014

AUT-RSS

Bobby A. DiModica

AlternateNaples Fire Protection, Inc.28741 South Diesel DriveBonita Springs, FL 34135Principal: Peter T. Schwab

IM 10/23/2013AUT-RSS

Mark E. Fessenden

AlternateTyco Fire Protection ProductsOne Stanton StreetMarinette, WI 54143-2542Principal: Terry L. Victor

M 1/14/2005

3

Page 5: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Address List No PhoneResidential Sprinkler Systems AUT-RSS

Automatic Sprinkler Systems

David R. Hague06/30/2016

AUT-RSS

Forest Hampton

AlternateLubrizol Advanced Materials, Inc.9911 Brecksville RoadCleveland, OH 44141-3201Principal: Donald R. Townley

M 08/17/2015AUT-RSS

Jeff Hebenstreit

AlternateUL LLC484 Tamarach DriveEdwardsville, IL 62025-5246Principal: Kerry M. Bell

RT 08/11/2014

AUT-RSS

Marshall A. Klein

AlternateMarshall A. Klein & Associates, Inc.6815 Autumn View DriveEldersburg, MD 21784-6304National Multifamily Housing CouncilPrincipal: Ronald G. Nickson

U 8/2/2010AUT-RSS

Gary Lampella

AlternateNational Association of Home Builders (NAHB)1201 15th Street NWWashington, DC 20005National Association of Home BuildersPrincipal: Daniel Buuck

U 04/05/2016

AUT-RSS

Dan Mendoza

AlternateAdvanced Automatic Sprinkler1947 San Ramon Valley BoulevardSuite 100San Ramon, CA 94583Principal: Fred Benn

IM 10/29/2012AUT-RSS

Angele Morcos

AlternateFM Global1151 Boston-Providence TurnpikeNorwood, MA 02062-9102Principal: Hong-Zeng Yu

I 07/29/2013

AUT-RSS

Thomas L. Multer

AlternateReliable Automatic Sprinkler Company, Inc.1470 Smith Grove RoadLiberty, SC 29657-4305National Fire Sprinkler AssociationManufacturerPrincipal: Thomas G. Deegan

M 4/15/2004AUT-RSS

David A. Nickelson

AlternateREHAU Incorporated1501 Edwards Ferry RoadLeesburg, VA 20176Principal: Jonathan C. Bittenbender

M 8/9/2011

AUT-RSS

Ernie Paez

AlternateCAL FIRE, Office of the State Fire Marshal602 East Huntington Drive, Suite AMonrovia, CA 91016-3600Principal: Tonya L. Hoover

E 03/07/2013AUT-RSS

William Roberts

AlternateQuick Response Fire Protection566 Halls Mill RoadFreehold, NJ 07728National Fire Sprinkler AssociationInstallerPrincipal: Ronald N. Webb

IM 12/08/2015

AUT-RSS

Ernesto Rodriguez, Jr.

AlternateWiginton Fire Protection Engineering, Inc.699 Aero LaneSanford, FL 32771Principal: George W. Stanley

IM 03/05/2012AUT-RSS

Melisa Rodriguez

AlternateUponor5925 148th Street WestApple Valley, MN 55124Principal: Eric J. Skare

M 10/28/2014

4

Page 6: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Address List No PhoneResidential Sprinkler Systems AUT-RSS

Automatic Sprinkler Systems

David R. Hague06/30/2016

AUT-RSS

Jason W. Ryckman

AlternateCanadian Automatic Sprinkler Association335 Renfrew Drive, Suite 302Markham, ON L3R 9S9 CanadaPrincipal: Michael Towler

IM 10/28/2014AUT-RSS

Timothy J. Skinner

AlternateNational Automatic Sprinkler Fitters LU 669PO Box 89Lima, OH 45802United Assn. of Journeymen & Apprentices of thePlumbing & Pipe Fitting IndustryPrincipal: Charles W. Ketner

L 08/11/2014

AUT-RSS

Brent Zimiga

AlternateRapid Fire Protection Inc.1805 Samco RoadRapid City, SD 57702American Fire Sprinkler AssociationInstaller/MaintainerPrincipal: John F. Viola

IM 04/05/2016AUT-RSS

Rohit Khanna

Nonvoting MemberUS Consumer Product Safety Commission5 Research PlaceRockville, MD 02085

C 10/10/1998

AUT-RSS

David R. Hague

Staff LiaisonNational Fire Protection Assocation1 Batterymarch ParkQuincy, MA 02169-7471

5

Page 7: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

TC on Residential Sprinkler Systems

First Draft Meeting

Union Station Hotel

Nashville, Tennessee

August 28-29, 2013

Attendees:

See attached list of attendees.

1. Maurice Pilette (TC Chair) called the meeting to order at 8:00 am and began

introductions.

2. The A2012 ROC minutes were approved.

3. Matt Klaus gave the staff report and a presentation on the meeting procedures.

4. Maurice Pilette discussed the logistics for the meeting and the order of the task

group reporting.

5. The committee processed the public input that was included in the meeting

agenda. See the First Draft Report for the official actions on the public input and

the First Revisions created by the TC.

6. New Business: The TC discussed several topics that will be studied by task

groups prior to the Second Draft Meeting. These topics and assignments are as

follows:

i) Summary Sheet Task Group (both 13R and 13D) – The TC revised the

information that is required in the system summary sheets. The following task

group with study this concept further prior to the Second Draft Meeting:

Cecil Bilbo

Mark Fessenden

Martin Trim

Peter Schwab – TG Leader

Ken Isman

ii) The remaining chapter task groups that were formed for the Pre-First Draft

Meeting will need to meet prior to the Second Draft Meeting pending public

comment submissions.

Page 2 of 298

Page 8: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

7. The Second Draft meeting is scheduled for Summer 2014 at a date and location to

be determined.

8. Meeting adjourned at 5:00 pm on August 29.

Page 3 of 298

Page 9: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Attendees

Principals:

Maurice Pilette, Chair

Kerry Bell

Fred Benn

Jonathan Bittenbender

Frederick Bradley

Thomas Deegan

Jeffrey Grove

Dana Haagensen

Tonya Hoover

Mark Hopkins

Kenneth Isman

Gary Johnson

Stephen Leyton

Ronald Nickson

Michael O’Brian

Steven Orlowski

Milosh Puchovsky

Scott Pugsley

Peter Schwab

Matt Sigler

Eric Skare

George Stanley

Martin Trim

Ed Van Walraven

Terry Victor

Ronald Webb

Hong-Zeng Yu

Alternates:

Jon Ackley

Mark Fessenden

Donald Hopkins

Jerry Hutner

Marshall Klein

George Laverick

Angele Morcos

Thomas Multer

David Nickelson

Matthew Osburn

Ernesto Rodriguez

Donald Towney

John Viola

Matthew Klaus, NFPA Staff Liaison

Guests:

Audrey Goldstein

Jeff Shapiro

Cecil BilboDave RoyceCarl Wiggins

Page 4 of 298

Page 10: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Process 

StageProcess Step Dates for TC

Dates for TC 

with CC

Public Input Closing Date  6/29/2016 6/29/2016

Final date for TC First Draft Meeting 12/7/2016 9/7/2016Posting of First Draft and TC Ballot  1/25/2017 10/19/2016Final date for Receipt of TC First Draft ballot 2/15/2017 11/9/2016Final date for Receipt of TC First Draft ballot ‐ recirc 2/22/2017 11/16/2016Posting of First Draft for CC Meeting 11/23/2016Final date for CC First Draft Meeting 1/4/2017Posting of First Draft and CC Ballot  1/25/2017Final date for Receipt of CC First Draft ballot 2/15/2017Final date for Receipt of CC First Draft ballot ‐ recirc 2/22/2017Post First Draft Report for Public Comment 3/1/2017 3/1/2017

Public Comment closing date  5/10/2017 5/10/2017

Notice published on Consent Standards (Standards that receive No Comments). Note: Date varies and determined via TC ballot.

_ _

Appeal Closing Date for Consent Standards (15 Days)     (Standards That Received 

No Comments)_ _

Final date for TC Second Draft Meeting 11/8/2017 8/2/2017Posting of Second Draft and TC Ballot  12/20/2017 9/13/2017Final date for Receipt of TC Second Draft Ballot 1/10/2018 10/4/2017Final date for receipt of TC Second Draft ballot ‐ recirc 1/17/2018 10/11/2017Posting of Second Draft for CC Mtg 10/18/2017Final date for CC Second Draft Meeting 11/29/2017Posting of Second Draft for CC Ballot 12/20/2017Final date for Receipt of CC Second Draft ballot 1/10/2018Final date for Receipt of CC Second Draft ballot ‐ recirc 1/17/2018Post Second Draft Report for NITMAM Review 1/24/2018 1/24/2018

Notice of Intent to Make a Motion (NITMAM) Closing Date 2/21/2018 2/21/2018Posting of Certified Amending Motions (CAMs) and Consent Standards 4/4/2018 4/4/2018Appeal Closing Date for Consent Standards (15 Days after posting) 4/19/2018 4/19/2018SC Issuance Date for Consent Standards  (10 Days)  4/29/2018 4/29/2018

Tech Session Association Meeting for Standards with CAMs 6/4‐7/2018 6/4‐7/2018

Appeal Closing Date for Standards with CAMs (20 Days after ATM) 6/27/2018 6/27/2018Council Issuance Date for Standards with CAMs* 8/14/2018 8/14/2018

Comment 

Stage (Second 

Draft)

Tech Session 

Preparation     

(& Issuance)

Appeals and 

Issuance

   2018 ANNUAL REVISION CYCLE 

Public Input 

Stage

(First Draft)

* Public Input Closing Dates may vary according to standards and schedules for Revision Cycles may change.  Please check the 

NFPA Website for the most up‐to‐date information on Public Input Closing Dates and schedules at www.nfpa.org/document # (i.e. 

www.nfpa.org/101) and click on Next Edition tab.

Page 5 of 298

Page 11: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 1-NFPA 13D-2015 [ Chapter 2 ]

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

1 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 6 of 298

Page 12: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

American Society of Mechanical Engineers

Chapter 2 Referenced Publications

2.1 General.

The documents or portions thereof listed in this chapter are referenced within this standard and shall beconsidered part of the requirements of this document.

2.2 NFPA Publications.

National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471.

NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, 2016 edition.

NFPA 72 ® , National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code, 2016 edition.

NFPA 220, Standard on Types of Building Construction, 2015 edition.

NFPA 750, Standard on Water Mist Fire Protection Systems, 2014 edition.

2.3 Other Publications.

2.3.1

ANSI

ASME Publications.

American National Standards Institute, Inc., 25 West 43rd Street, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10036.

ANSI B36.10M, Welded and Seamless Wrought Steel Pipe , 2004.

2.3.2 ASME Publications.

ASME International , Two Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990.

ASME B16.1, Gray Iron Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings, Classes 25, 125, and 250 ,

2010

2015 .

ASME B16.3, Malleable Iron Threaded Fittings, Classes 150 and 300 ,

2006

2011 .

ASME B16.4, Gray Iron Threaded Fittings , Classes 125 and 250,

2006

2011 .

ASME B16.5, Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings, NPS 1/2 through NPS 24 Metric/Inch Standard ,

2009

2013 .

ASME B16.9, Factory-Made Wrought Buttwelding Fittings ,

2007

2013 .

ASME B16.11, Forged Fittings, Socket-Welding and Threaded ,

2009

2011 .

ANSI/

ASME B16.15,

Cast Bronze Threaded Fittings , 2006

Cast Copper Alloy Threaded Fittings Classes 125 and 250 , 2013 .

ASME B16.18, Cast Copper Alloy Solder Joint Pressure Fittings ,

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

2 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 7 of 298

Page 13: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

2001

2012 .

ASME B16.22, Wrought Copper and Copper Alloy Solder - Joint Pressure Fittings ,

2001

2013 .

ASME B16.25, Buttwelding Ends ,

2007

2012 .

ASME B36.10M, Welded and Seamless Wrought Steel Pipe , 2015 .

2.3.

3

2 ASTM Publications.

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM A53/A53M, Standard Specification for Pipe, Steel, Black and Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated, Weldedand Seamless , 2012.

ASTM A135/A135M, Standard Specification for Electric-Resistance-Welded Steel Pipe , 2009

(2004)

, reapproved 2014 .

ASTM A234/A234M, Standard Specification for Piping Fittings of Wrought Carbon Steel and Alloy Steelfor Moderate and High Temperature Service ,

2013 e1

2015 .

ASTM A795/A795M, Standard Specification for Black and Hot-Dipped Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) Weldedand Seamless Steel Pipe for Fire Protection Use , 2013.

ASTM B32, Standard Specification for Solder Metal , 2008 , reapproved 2014 .

ASTM B43, Standard Specification for Seamless Red Brass Pipe ,

2009

Standard Sizes , 2015 .

ASTM B75/B75M, Standard Specification for Seamless Copper Tube , 2011.

ASTM B88, Standard Specification for Seamless Copper Water Tube ,

2009

2014 .

ASTM B251, Standard Specification for General Requirements for Wrought Seamless Copper andCopper-Alloy Tube , 2010.

ASTM B813, Standard Specification for Liquid and Paste Fluxes for Soldering Applications of Copperand Copper-Alloy Tube ,

2010 (2010)

2016 .

ASTM B828, Standard Practice for Making Capillary Joints by Soldering of Copper and Copper AlloyTube and Fittings , 2002 , reapproved 2010 .

ASTM F437, Standard Specification for Threaded Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic PipeFittings, Schedule 80 ,

2009

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

3 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 8 of 298

Page 14: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

2015 .

ASTM F438, Standard Specification for Socket-Type Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) PlasticPipe Fittings, Schedule 40 ,

2009

2015 .

ASTM F439, Standard Specification for Socket-Type Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) PlasticPipe Fittings, Schedule 80 , 2013.

ASTM F442/F442M, Standard Specification for Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic Pipe(SDR-PR) , 2013 e1.

ASTM F876, Standard Specification for Crosslinked Polyethylene (PEX) Tubing ,

2013 e1

2015a .

2.3.

4

3 AWS Publications.

American Welding Society,

550 NW LeJeune Road,

8869 NW 36 Street, #130 , Miami, FL

33126

33166-6672 .

AWS A5.8 /A5.8M , Specification for Filler Metals for Brazing and Braze Welding ,

2004

2011, Amendment 1, 2012 .

2.3.

5

4 Other Publications.

Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary , 11th edition, Merriam-Webster, Inc., Springfield, MA, 2003.

2.4 References for Extracts in Mandatory Sections.

NFPA 5000 ® , Building Construction and Safety Code ® , 2015 edition.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Referenced current SDO names, addresses, standard names, numbers and editions.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 2-NFPA 13D-2015 [Chapter B]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Aaron Adamczyk

Organization: [ Not Specified ]

Street Address:

City:

State:

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

4 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 9 of 298

Page 15: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sun Dec 20 00:27:48 EST 2015

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

5 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 10 of 298

Page 16: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 88-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 2.3.2 ]

2.3.2 ASME Publications.

American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Two Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990.

ASME B16.1, Gray Iron Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings, Classes 25, 125, and 250, 2010.

ASME B16.3, Malleable Iron Threaded Fittings, Classes 150 and 300, 2006.

ASME B16.4, Gray Iron Threaded Fittings, Classes 125 and 250, 2006.

ASME B16.5, Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings, NPS 1/2 through NPS 24 Metric/Inch Standard, 2009.

ASME B16.9, Factory-Made Wrought Buttwelding Fittings, 2007.

ASME B16.11, Forged Fittings, Socket-Welding and Threaded, 2009.

ANSI/ASME B16.15, Cast Bronze Threaded Fittings, 2006.

ASME B16.18, Cast Copper Alloy Solder Joint Pressure Fittings, 2001.

ASME B16.22, Wrought Copper and Copper Alloy Solder Joint Pressure Fittings, 2001.

ASME B16.25, Buttwelding Ends, 2007.

ASME B16.51, Copper and Copper Alloy Press-Connect Pressure Fittings

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Currently NFPA 13D does not currently reference ASME B16.51 This Standard establishes requirements for cast copper alloy, wrought copper, and wrought copper alloy, press-connect pressure fittings for use with hard drawn seamless copper water tube conforming to ASTM B88 for piping systems conveying water. The press-connect system (tube, fitting, and joint) conforming to this Standard is for use at a maximum pressure of 1 380 kPa (200 psi) over the temperature range from 0°C to 93°C (32°F to 200°F). This Standard provides requirements for fittings suitable for press-connect joining and covers the following:(a) size designations(b) pressure–temperature ratings(c) terminology(d) dimensions and tolerances(e) materials(f) design qualification(g) required installation instructions(h) markings By adding this standard, this will direct users to the correct design and material dimensions for copper press-connect fittings.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Mark Fasel

Organization: Viega Llc

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 14:54:22 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

6 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 11 of 298

Page 17: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 6-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ]

2.3.3 ASTM Publications.

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM A53/A53M, Standard Specification for Pipe, Steel, Black and Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated, Welded andSeamless, 2012.

ASTM A135/A135M, Standard Specification for Electric-Resistance-Welded Steel Pipe, 2009 (2004 2014 ).

ASTM A234/A234M, Standard Specification for Piping Fittings of Wrought Carbon Steel and Alloy Steel forModerate and High Temperature Service, 2013 e1.

ASTM A795/A795M, Standard Specification for Black and Hot-Dipped Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) Weldedand Seamless Steel Pipe for Fire Protection Use, 2013.

ASTM B32, Standard Specification for Solder Metal, 2008.

ASTM B43, Standard Specification for Seamless Red Brass Pipe, 2009.

ASTM B75/B75M, Standard Specification for Seamless Copper Tube, 2011.

ASTM B88, Standard Specification for Seamless Copper Water Tube, 2009.

ASTM B251, Standard Specification for General Requirements for Wrought Seamless Copper andCopper-Alloy Tube, 2010.

ASTM B813, Standard Specification for Liquid and Paste Fluxes for Soldering Applications of Copper andCopper-Alloy Tube, 2010 (2010).

ASTM B828, Standard Practice for Making Capillary Joints by Soldering of Copper and Copper Alloy Tubeand Fittings, 2002.

ASTM F437, Standard Specification for Threaded Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic PipeFittings, Schedule 80, 2009 2015 .

ASTM F438, Standard Specification for Socket-Type Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic PipeFittings, Schedule 40, 2009 2015 .

ASTM F439, Standard Specification for Socket-Type Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic PipeFittings, Schedule 80, 2013.

ASTM F442/F442M, Standard Specification for Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic Pipe(SDR-PR), 2013 e1.

ASTM F876, Standard Specification for Crosslinked Polyethylene (PEX) Tubing, 2013 e1 2015a .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

updates

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Marcelo Hirschler

Organization: GBH International

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jan 06 17:46:22 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

7 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 12 of 298

Page 18: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 28-NFPA 13D-2016 [ New Section after 2.4 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Underwriters Laboratories Publications

ANSI/UL 213 Standard for Rubber Gasketed Fittings, 2004.

ANSI/UL 852 Standard for Metallic Sprinkler Pipe for Fire Protection Service, 2008.

ANSI/UL 1821 Standard for Thermoplastic Sprinkler Pipe and Fittings For Fire Protection Service,2015.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Currently the UL 213, UL 852 and UL 1821 Standards are not referenced by NFPA 13D but are widely used standards for Rubber Gasketed Fittings for Fire Protection Service, Metallic Sprinkler Pipe for Fire Protection Service and Thermoplastic sprinkler pipe and fittings for Fire protection service. The addition of the publications coincides with the related public input submittals and will help to more clearly identify accepted reference standards for fire protection pipe and fittings.The addition of these publications coincides with the related public input submittals. There is no fiscal impact associated with this proposal.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 22-NFPA 13D-2016 [Section No. 5.2.5 [Excluding anySub-Sections]]

Standard Referenced inTable

Public Input No. 29-NFPA 13D-2016 [Section No. 5.2.3.2]

Public Input No. 34-NFPA 13D-2016 [Section No. 5.2.2 [Excluding anySub-Sections]]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Mark Fasel

Organization: Viega Llc

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 02 10:24:35 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

8 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 13 of 298

Page 19: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 41-NFPA 13D-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.1 ]

3.3.1 Bathroom

Within a dwelling unit, any room or compartment containing a lavatory dedicated to personal hygiene, or awater closet, or bathing capability such as a shower or tub, or any combination of facilities thereof.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Even though the definition can be found in 13R, at times there have been conflicting opinions about what constitutes a bathroom, especially when the bathroom is divided up into two separate rooms and the combined total size exceeds 55 square feet but the individual room size is less than 55 square feet.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 42-NFPA 13D-2016 [New Section after A.3.2.4]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Melisa Rodriguez

Organization: Uponor

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 21 17:18:52 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

9 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 14 of 298

Page 20: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 32-NFPA 13D-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.6 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Press-Connect Fitting-

A permanent mechanical connection for joining copper tubing, steel and stainless steel pipe utilizingelastomeric seal or an elastomeric seal and corrosion-resistant grip ring or rings. Fitting connections aremade with a pressing tool and jaws or rings approved by the fitting manufacturer for use in accordance withthe product listing.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Currently there is no definition for Press-Connect fittings in NFPA 13D. The term Press-Connect Fitting is used in both the IAPMO and ICC codes. The wide use of Mechanical type fittings has created the need to identify fittings such as Press-Connect and provide definitions to prevent confusion between mechanical fitting types and to help identify the correct standards these fittings are required to be listed to. This definition is proposed to prevent confusion within the industry and aligns definitions for these type fittings. This definition will also help to prevent incorrect terminology in the industry such as referring to Press-Connect fittings as Propress which we have all commonly seen. As the Manufacturer of Propress we do like that our brand name is the name used by those in the industry when referring to Press-Connect fittings, but we do want the industry to have the correct terminology of the fittings to avoid any confusion between manufactured products.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 25-NFPA 13D-2016 [Section No. 5.2.6] Reference to Press-Connect within the code.

Public Input No. 23-NFPA 13D-2016 [Section No. 5.2.7] Refernce to Press-Connect within the code.

Public Input No. 33-NFPA 13D-2016 [Section No. 5.2.4]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Mark Fasel

Organization: Viega Llc

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 02 11:57:06 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

10 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 15 of 298

Page 21: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 45-NFPA 13D-2016 [ New Section after 4.1.2 ]

4.1.3

Sprinklers having a temperature rating of 250°F to 300°F (121°C to 149°C) shall be classified as hightemperature-rated sprinklers.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

High temperature-rated sprinklers are called out in 7.5.6.3(4) and as such should be defined in the same manner as ordinary and intermediate temperature-rated sprinklers are.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Melisa Rodriguez

Organization: Uponor

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 23 09:20:50 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

11 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 16 of 298

Page 22: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 77-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 4.4 ]

4.4 Smoke Alarms.

Smoke When provided, smoke alarms shall be provided installed in accordance with NFPA 72.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

13D does not govern the requirements for the installation of smoke alarms. A local alarm is a foundational and critical element to the 13D standard, and this provision is retained adequately in section 7.6, which requires a waterflow alarm in systems installed in homes without smoke alarms installed in accordance with NFPA 72.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Chase Browning

Organization: Medford Fire Rescue, Medford Oregon

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 28 23:41:44 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

12 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 17 of 298

Page 23: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 56-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 5.1.2.1 ]

5.1.2.1

Tanks, expansion tanks, gauges, pumps, hangers, waterflow detection devices, and valves shall not berequired to be listed.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Based on independent testing, some unlisted hangers used on NFPA 13D sprinkler systems have caused the sprinkler system to catastrophically fail during a fire scenario. A specific example of an unlisted hanger that has been witnessed to fail is the talon clamp with nail. This hanger clamp has a lower melting point than the required sprinkler head activation temperature and actually caused an entire section of the system piping to collapse, rendering the sprinkler system ineffective. If listed hangers are required, this potential hazard can be avoided with little impact to the overall system cost, in keeping with the intent of the standard to provide affordable protection from fire for residents of one- and two-family dwellings.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Tony Fleming

Organization: Metropolitan Fire Protection

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Jun 27 20:57:35 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

13 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 18 of 298

Page 24: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 63-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 5.1.2.1 ]

5.1.2.1

Tanks, expansion tanks, gauges, pumps, underground pipe and fittings, hangers, waterflow detectiondevices, and valves shall not be required to be listed.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

In the scenario where the water supply source and riser assembly is not in the dwelling unit, underground pipe and fittings may be needed to run from the riser assembly to the dwelling. FEMA uses this arrangement when providing sprinkler systems for many of their manufactured housing units. This arrangement could also be used when retrofitting an existing dwelling or home. The added text makes it clear that underground pipe and fittings do not have to be listed. However, in accordance with section 5.3 the underground pipe and fittings must comply with the applicable plumbing code for the dwelling or home.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 64-NFPA 13D-2016 [Section No. 5.3]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Terry Victor

Organization: Tyco Simplex Grinnell

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 28 13:34:46 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

14 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 19 of 298

Page 25: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 34-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 5.2.2 [Excluding any Sub-Sections] ]

Pipe or tube used in sprinkler systems shall be of the materials specified in Table 5.2.2 or shall be inaccordance with 5.2.3.

Table 5.2.2 Pipe or Tube Materials and Dimensions

Materials and Dimensions Standard

Standard Specification for Black and Hot-Dipped Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) Welded andSeamless Steel Pipe for Fire Protection Use

ASTM A795

Standard Specification for Pipe, Steel, Black and Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated, Welded andSeamless

ASTM A53

Welded and Seamless Wrought Steel PipeANSIB36.10M

Standard Specification for Electric-Resistance-Welded Steel Pipe ASTM A135

Standard Specification for Seamless Copper Tube [Copper Tube (Drawn, Seamless)] ASTM B75

Standard Specification for Seamless Copper Water Tube ASTM B88

Standard Specification for General Requirements for Wrought Seamless Copper andCopper-Alloy Tube

ASTM B251

Standard Specification for Liquid and Paste Fluxes for Soldering Applications of Copper andCopper-Alloy Tube

ASTM B813

Specification for Filler Metals for Brazing and Braze Welding (BCuP, copper-phosphorus, orcopper-phosphorus-silver brazing filler metal)

AWS A5.8

Standard Specification for Solder Metal [alloy grades containing less than 0.2 percent lead asidentified in ASTM B32, Table 5, Section 1, and having a solidus temperature that exceeds400°F (204°C)]

ASTM B32

Standard Specification for Seamless Red Brass Pipe

Standard for Metallic Sprinkler Pipe for Fire Protection Service

ASTM B43

UL 852

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Currently this UL standard is not included in NFPA 13D. This standard is widely used by designers, installers and manufacturers and referencing in this table will properly guide the industry to this important and widely used standard. There is no cost associated with this addition to the table.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 28-NFPA 13D-2016 [New Section after 2.4] Referenced Publications

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Mark Fasel

Organization: Viega Llc

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 09 16:56:54 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

15 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 20 of 298

Page 26: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 29-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 5.2.3.2 ]

5.2.3.2 *

Chlorinated polyvinyl chloride (CPVC) pipe and crosslinked polyethylene (PEX) pipe shall comply with theportions of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and UL standards specified in Table5.2.3.2 that apply to fire protection service.

Table 5.2.3.2 Specifically Listed Pipe or Tube Materials and Dimensions

Materials and Dimensions Standard

Nonmetallic Piping:

Standard Specification for Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Pipe ASTM F442

Standard Specification for Crosslinked Polyethylene (PEX) Tubing

Standard for Thermoplastic Pipe and Fittings for Fire Protection Service

ASTM F876

UL 1821

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

This standard was written for CPVC pipe and fittings for Fire Protection Systems and should be included in NFPA 13D to direct manufacturer's, designers and installers to the appropriate standards for Thermoplastic fittings. The addition of the standard will be consistent with referenced standards in the ICC Fire Code TABLE AG101.1 and Section AG102 and will help to prevent confusion within the industry. There is no cost associated with the inclusion of this standard as manufacturers of these products currently list to this standard. UL 1821 has additional performance requirements above and beyond ASTM f442 and ASTM F 876 and should be referenced in this table.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 28-NFPA 13D-2016 [New Section after 2.4] Referenced Publications

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Mark Fasel

Organization: Viega Llc

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 02 11:01:54 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

16 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 21 of 298

Page 27: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 33-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 5.2.4 ]

5.2.4

Schedule 10 steel pipe shall be permitted to be joined with press-connect fittings or mechanical groovecouplings approved for service.

5.2.4.1

Where mechanical groove couplings are used to join pipe, grooves shall be rolled on the pipe by anapproved groove-rolling machine.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Current language does not allow for press connect technology to be used on Schedule 10 piping. Addition of Press-Connect fittings in this section will prevent confusion within the industry on allowable methods for joining schedule 10 pipe. Press-Connect fittings are listed for use with Schedules 40 and 10 pipes as they do not reduce wall thickness of the pipe by threading.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 32-NFPA 13D-2016 [New Section after 3.3.6] Definition of Press-Connect Fitting

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Mark Fasel

Organization: Viega Llc

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 02 12:07:50 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

17 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 22 of 298

Page 28: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 22-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 5.2.5 [Excluding any Sub-Sections] ]

Fittings used in sprinkler systems shall be of the materials listed in Table 5.2.5 or shall be in accordancewith 5.2.9.

Table 5.2.5 Fitting Materials and Dimensions

Materials and Dimensions Standard

Cast Iron:

Gray Iron Threaded Fittings ASME B16.4

Gray Iron Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings ASME B16.1

Malleable Iron:

Malleable Iron Threaded Fittings ASME B16.3

Steel:

Factory-Made Wrought Buttwelding Fittings ASME B16.9

Buttwelding Ends ASME B16.25

Standard Specification for Piping Fittings of Wrought Carbon Steel and Alloy Steel forModerate and High Temperature Service

ASTM A234

Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings ASME B16.5

Forged Fittings, Socket-Welding and Threaded

Rubber Gasketed Fittings for Fire Protection Service

ASME B16.11

UL 213

Copper:

Wrought Copper and Copper Alloy Solder Joint Pressure Fittings

Rubber Gasketed Fittings for Fire Protection Service

ASME B16.22

UL 213

Cast Copper Alloy Solder Joint Pressure Fittings ASME B16.18

Cast Bronze Threaded FittingsANSI/ASMEB16.15

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

UL 213 is currently not referenced by NFPA 13D-2016. UL 213 is a widely used standard for Rubber Gasketed Fittings for Fire Protection Service for copper, steel, and stainless steel and should be referenced.Adding this standard reference will harmonize the standards used for Rubber Gasketed Sprinkler pipe fittings.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 23-NFPA 13D-2016 [Section No. 5.2.7]

Public Input No. 25-NFPA 13D-2016 [Section No. 5.2.6]

Public Input No. 28-NFPA 13D-2016 [New Section after 2.4]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Mark Fasel

Organization: Viega Llc

Street Address:

City:

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

18 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 23 of 298

Page 29: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 02 08:40:29 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

19 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 24 of 298

Page 30: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 89-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 5.2.5 [Excluding any Sub-Sections] ]

Fittings used in sprinkler systems shall be of the materials listed in Table 5.2.5 or shall be in accordancewith 5.2.9.

Table 5.2.5 Fitting Materials and Dimensions

Materials and Dimensions Standard

Cast Iron:

Gray Iron Threaded Fittings ASME B16.4

Gray Iron Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings ASME B16.1

Malleable Iron:

Malleable Iron Threaded Fittings ASME B16.3

Steel:

Factory-Made Wrought Buttwelding Fittings ASME B16.9

Buttwelding Ends ASME B16.25

Standard Specification for Piping Fittings of Wrought Carbon Steel and Alloy Steel forModerate and High Temperature Service

ASTM A234

Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings ASME B16.5

Forged Fittings, Socket-Welding and Threaded ASME B16.11

Copper:

Wrought Copper and Copper Alloy Solder Joint Pressure Fittings ASME B16.22

Cast Copper Alloy Solder Joint Pressure Fittings ASME B16.18

Cast Bronze Threaded FittingsANSI/ASMEB16.15

Copper and Copper Alloy Press-Connect Pressure Fittings ASME B16.51

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Currently NFPA 13D does not currently reference ASME B16.51 This Standard establishes requirements for cast copper alloy, wrought copper, and wrought copper alloy, press-connect pressure fittings for use with hard drawn seamless copper water tube conforming to ASTM B88 for piping systems conveying water. The press-connect system (tube, fitting, and joint) conforming to this Standard is for use at a maximum pressure of 1 380 kPa (200 psi) over the temperature range from 0°C to 93°C (32°F to 200°F). This Standard provides requirements for fittings suitable for press-connect joining and covers the following:(a) size designations(b) pressure–temperature ratings(c) terminology(d) dimensions and tolerances(e) materials(f) design qualification(g) required installation instructions(h) markings By adding this standard, this will direct users to the correct design and material dimensions for copper press-connect fittings.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Mark Fasel

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

20 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 25 of 298

Page 31: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Organization: Viega Llc

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 14:56:04 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

21 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 26 of 298

Page 32: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 25-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 5.2.6 ]

5.2.6

Joints for the connection of copper tube shall be brazed press-connect or brazed on dry pipe andpreaction systems.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

The current language implies that only brazed fittings are to be used in dry pipe and pre-action systems. Copper Press Connect fittings listed to UL 213 Rubber Gasketed Fittings for Fire Protection Service are listed for use in dry and pre-action systems. This modification to the section will remove confusion in this section that only brazed fittings are suitable for these applications.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 22-NFPA 13D-2016 [Section No. 5.2.5 [Excluding anySub-Sections]]

StandardReference

Public Input No. 32-NFPA 13D-2016 [New Section after 3.3.6]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Mark Fasel

Organization: Viega Llc

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 02 09:56:51 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

22 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 27 of 298

Page 33: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 23-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 5.2.7 ]

5.2.7

Joints for the connection of copper tube for wet pipe systems and antifreeze systems shall be solder joints,press-connect or be brazed.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Currently only soldered or brazed joints are allowed for joining copper per this section

The addition of press-connect will eliminate the confusion for allowable copper pipe joining as press-connect fittings are the most widely used joints outside of brazed or soldered joints. Section 5.2.9 allows other types of fittings to be used where listed for sprinkler systems but there is a need to identify press-connect fittings within the body of the code as their use is now very familiar with building officials, designers and installers and it will help to clarify terminology when referring to these fittings as Press-Connect and not Propress or Sharkbite names which are commonly used to describe Press-Connect and Push Fit style fittings. By adding this terminology it will eliminate confusion of the name of the fitting type.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 22-NFPA 13D-2016 [Section No.5.2.5 [Excluding any Sub-Sections]]

Proposed addition of UL 213 for Rubber GasketedFittings for Fire Protection Service

Public Input No. 32-NFPA 13D-2016 [New Sectionafter 3.3.6]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Mark Fasel

Organization: Viega Llc

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 02 09:34:44 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

23 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 28 of 298

Page 34: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 64-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 5.3 ]

5.3* Underground Pipe and Fittings .

Any type of pipe or tube acceptable under the applicable plumbing code for underground supply pipe shallbe acceptable as an underground supply for these portions of a fire sprinkler system when .

(1) When installed between the point of connection and the water supply source.

(2)* When installed between a remote system riser and the dwelling or home .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

In the scenario where the water supply source and the riser assembly is not in the dwelling unit, underground pipe and fittings may be needed to run from the riser assembly to the dwelling. FEMA uses this arrangement when providing sprinkler systems for many of their manufactured housing units. This arrangement could also be used when retrofitting an existing dwelling or home. The added text makes it clear that underground pipe and fittings do not have to be listed. However, in accordance with section 5.3 the underground pipe and fittings must comply with the applicable plumbing code for the dwelling or home.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 63-NFPA 13D-2016 [Section No. 5.1.2.1]

Public Input No. 65-NFPA 13D-2016 [New Section after A.5.3]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Terry Victor

Organization: Tyco Simplex Grinnell

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 28 13:37:51 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

24 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 29 of 298

Page 35: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 35-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 6.1.1 ]

6.1.1

Every automatic sprinkler system shall have at least one automatic water supply in accordance with 6 .2.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

The term “automatic water supply” is not defined. This revision points the reader in the direction of what the provision is intending.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Jim Muir

Organization: Building Safety Division, Clark County, Washington

Affilliation: NFPA's Building Code Development Committee (BCDC)

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 16 17:23:53 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

25 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 30 of 298

Page 36: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 18-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 6.1.3 ]

6.1.3

Where stored water is used as the sole source of supply, the minimum quantity shall be permitted to equalthe two sprinkler highest calculated water demand rate times 7 minutes where dwelling units meet thefollowing criteria:

(1) One story in height

(2) Less than 2000 ft2 (186 m2) in area

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

It is not uncommon for designers to design single-sprinkler compartments to a much higher spacing than open areas requiring multiple sprinklers. By doing this, bedrooms and other similar sized rooms can be protected with a single sprinkler. It is not uncommon for the single sprinkler compartments to be designed at 20'x20' spacing, with a 20 gpm flow, and the multiple sprinkler compartments to be designed to 12'x12' spacing with a 16 gpm flow for a two-sprinkler calculation. In such a scenario, the two sprinkler water demand rate is not the highest volume, and therefore, not the highest water supply demand.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Ivan Humberson

Organization: City Of Gaithersburg, Md.

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Apr 28 16:07:45 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

26 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 31 of 298

Page 37: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 40-NFPA 13D-2016 [ New Section after 6.1.4 ]

6.1.5

The stored water supply requirement of 6.1.2 or 6.1.3 shall be permitted to be a combination of the water inthe storage tank and the refill rate when the refilling method is automatic.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Currently 6.1.4 specifically indicates water from a well. If using a storage tank with automatic refill, then the refill rate should be allowed to be calculated when determining the size of the holding tank.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 21 16:18:00 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

27 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 32 of 298

Page 38: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 54-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 6.2 [Excluding any Sub-Sections] ]

The following water supply sources shall be considered to be acceptable by this standard:

(1) A connection to a reliable waterworks system with or without an automatically operated pump

(2) An elevated tank

(3) A pressure tank designed to American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) standards for apressure vessel with a reliable pressure source

(4) A stored water source with an automatically operated pump

(5) A well with a pump of sufficient capacity and pressure to meet the sprinkler system demand

(6) A swimming Pool with a pump dedicated to the sprinkler system

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Essentially this is a stored water source that is capable of supplying the sprinkler system demand for the 10 minute duration

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Jun 24 08:04:24 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

28 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 33 of 298

Page 39: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 66-NFPA 13D-2016 [ New Section after 6.2.3.2 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

6.2.3* Where a well pump is the source of supply for both the fire sprinkler system and the domesticwater system sections 6.1.4 and 6.5 shall apply.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

While well pumps are an economical solution for a water supply in rural areas, many home builders aren’t aware of this option. The additional annex text should help bring this option to the forefront, provide additional guidance for volume calulations, and decrease the cost of the residential sprinkler system.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 67-NFPA 13D-2016 [New Section after A.6.2]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Terry Victor

Organization: Tyco Simplex Grinnell

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 28 13:45:45 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

29 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 34 of 298

Page 40: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 43-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 6.3.1 ]

6.3.1

A multipurpose piping system shall be installed in accordance with 6.3.2 through 6.5. 3. 4 .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Section 6.4 and 6.5 are not specific to multipurpose piping systems. This may have been a typo in the 2016 edition.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Melisa Rodriguez

Organization: Uponor

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 21 17:28:44 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

30 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 35 of 298

Page 41: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 61-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 7.2.6 ]

7.2.6 *

Where a pressure-reducing or pressure-regulating valve is installed on a stand alone system, a pressuregauge and a a test connection with a K-factor at least as large as the smallest sprinkler K-factor on thesystem shall be installed downstream of the device.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Relocate the gauge requirement to section 7.3

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 28 11:40:51 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

31 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 36 of 298

Page 42: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 90-NFPA 13D-2016 [ New Section after 7.5.6.3 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Type your content here ...

(5) Sprinklers in closets containing ventless clothes dryers shall be of the intermediate-temperatureclassification or higher.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Ventless clothes dryers placed within closets have the potential to raise ceiling temperatures above 100 F (38 C) for sustained periods of time, potentially weakening the operating mechanisms of ordinary temperature rated fire sprinklers over months or years of use, leading to inadvertent operations. While ventless clothes dryers have been used in Europe for many years, they are fairly new to the North American market, where vented clothes dryers have been the norm. More expensive than vented dryers, they generally incorporate condensers in a “two-loop” system to first heat some incoming air, allowing it to absorb moisture from the damp clothes, then continually condense the heated moist air to release the water before recirculating the resulting dry air within the clothes dryer. Unlike vented dryers, where moist heated air is exhausted to the building exterior, these devices capture the water to a drain or pan, while the heat from the condensing cycle is exhausted into the immediate area.

The condensers in combination machines that both wash and dry the clothes are generally water-cooled, such that quantities of cold water are used to condense the moisture evaporated from the clothes during the drying cycle, and pumped away through the drain line. But the standalone dryer units are air-cooled, using the ambient air as a heat sink. While this heat can be dissipated in a large laundry room, it can be expected to raise the temperatures within a laundry closet to levels unacceptable for ordinary temperature rated sprinklers. All standalone ventless dryers in the market are reportedly of this type.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Russell Fleming

Organization: International Fire Sprinkler Assn. / NFSA

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 15:56:42 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

32 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 37 of 298

Page 43: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 79-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 7.5.6.3 ]

7.5.6.3*

The following practices shall be observed when installing residential sprinklers unless higher expectedambient temperatures require a higher temperature rating:

(1) Sprinklers under glass or plastic skylights exposed to direct rays of the sun shall be of intermediatetemperature classification.

(2) Sprinklers in an unventilated concealed space under an uninsulated roof or in an unventilated atticshall be of intermediate temperature classification.

(3) Sprinklers installed near specific heat sources that are identified in Table 7.5.6.3 shall be of thetemperature rating indicated in Table 7.5.6.3 unless sprinklers are listed for positioning closer to theheat source.

(4) Sprinklers installed in saunas and steam rooms where the maximum ambient ceiling temperatures arebetween 151°F and 225°F (66°C to 107°C) shall be high temperature–rated spray sprinklers.

Table 7.5.6.3 Minimum Distances for Ordinary and Intermediate Temperature Residential Sprinklers *

From Edge

of Source to Ordinary

Temperature Sprinkler

From Edge

of Source to Intermediate

Temperature Sprinkler

Heat Source in. mm in. mm

Side of open or recessed fireplace 36 900 12 300

Front of recessed fireplace 60 1500 36 900

Coal- or wood-burning stove 42 1050 12 300

Kitchen range 18 450 9 229

Wall oven 18 450 9 229

Hot air flues 18 450 9 229

Uninsulated heat ducts 18 450 9 229

Uninsulated hot water pipes 12 300 6 150

Side of ceiling- or wall-mounted hot air diffusers 24 600 12 300

Front of wall-mounted hot air diffusers 36 900 18 450

Hot water heater or furnace 6 150 3 76

Light fixture

 0 W–250 W 6 150 3 76

 250 W–499 W 12 300 6 150

Additional Proposed Changes

File Name Description Approved

Fireplace2.pdf Guidance for spacing around fireplaces

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

The language provided in the table provides ambiguous information about spacing sprinklers with regard to fireplaces. These diagrams provide additional clarification. Alternatively, the Annex comment could be attached to 7.5.6.3(3).

Related Public Inputs for This Document

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

33 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 38 of 298

Page 44: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

36” 36”

60”

Recessed Fireplace: 60” from open face, 36” from sides of opening

Page 39 of 298

Page 45: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

36” 36”

Open Fireplace: 36” from faces with radiused corners

Page 40 of 298

Page 46: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 80-NFPA 13D-2016 [New Section after A.7.5.6.3]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Robert Upson

Organization: National Fire Sprinkler Association

Affilliation: NFSA Engineering and Standards Committee

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 10:40:24 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

34 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 41 of 298

Page 47: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 21-NFPA 13D-2016 [ New Section after 8.1.1.2 ]

8.1.1.3 Where a physical barrier exists between the sprinklers that prevents each sprinkler fromdirectly spraying on the other, there shall be no minimum distance between sprinklers.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Similar to the baffle rules in NFPA 13, this eliminates the need to worry about a minimum distance if there is some physical barrier between the sprinklers. This might be helpful in some room configurations where sprinklers need to be installed within 8 ft of each other.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Kenneth Isman

Organization: University of Maryland

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu May 26 12:59:07 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

35 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 42 of 298

Page 48: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 84-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 8.1.3.1.2 ]

8.1.3.1.2*

Where construction features or other special conditions exist that are outside the scope of sprinkler listings,listed sprinklers shall be permitted to be installed beyond their listing limitations, provided technicaldocumentation has been provided demonstrating equivalency as approved by the authority havingjurisdiction .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

The purpose of this PI is to require that an approved report be provided prior to installing fire sprinklers outside of their listing. The base code allows for the installation of fire sprinklers outside of their listing, but does not provide guidance on the limitations of this provision. Requiring the report will provide guidance on acceptable methods of installation, even if outside of the listing of the fire sprinkler.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Lynn Nielson

Organization: City Of Henderson

Affilliation: Self

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 14:02:03 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

36 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 43 of 298

Page 49: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 51-NFPA 13D-2016 [ New Section after 8.2.1.1 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Type your content here ...

8.2.1.1.1 The requirements of 8.2.1.1 shall not apply for residential occupancies with ceilings ofnoncombustible or limited-combustible construction where either X.X.X.X (A) or X.X.X.X (B) applies.

(A) Where a vertical change in ceiling elevation within the area of coverage of the sprinkler creates adistance of more than 12 in. (300 mm) between the upper ceiling and the sprinkler deflector, a vertical planeextending down from the ceiling at the change in elevation shall be considered a wall for the purpose ofsprinkler spacing as shown in Figure X.X.X.X (A).

(B) Where the distance between the upper ceiling and the sprinkler deflector is less than or equal to 12 in.(300 mm), the sprinklers shall be permitted to be spaced as though the ceiling was flat, provided theobstruction rules are observed as shown in Figure X.X.X.X (B).

Additional Proposed Changes

File Name Description Approved

vertical_change.jpg

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

The proposed chance provides guidance on how to position residential pendent sprinklers under ceilings with varying ceiling planes.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Mark Fessenden

Organization: Tyco Fire Protection Products

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 23 16:07:46 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

37 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 44 of 298

Page 50: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Page 45 of 298

Page 51: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 52-NFPA 13D-2016 [ New Section after 8.2.1.1 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Type your content here ...

The requirements of 8.2.1.1 shall not apply for residential pendent sprinklers installed as show in FigureX.X.X.X (A) or Figure X.X.X.X (B).

Additional Proposed Changes

File Name Description Approved

Beam_Figures.jpg

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

10.2.1(2) or 10.2.1(4) describes how to calculate sprinklers under a beamed ceiling, but no similar criteria exists telling how to install those sprinklers. The proposed chance provides guidance on how to position residential pendent sprinklers under beamed ceilings.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Mark Fessenden

Organization: Tyco Fire Protection Products

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 23 16:41:14 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

38 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 46 of 298

Page 52: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Page 47 of 298

Page 53: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 60-NFPA 13D-2016 [ New Section after 8.2.1.1 ]

8.2.1.2

Pendent and upright sprinklers installed in accordance with 10.2.1 shall be permitted to be installed within 3inches below a beam having a depth no greater than 14 in.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Both NFPA 13D and NFPA 13R allow for installation of sprinklers below beamed ceilings in the discharge criteria, however, as the listing for installation below beams up to 14 inches has been removed from their certification for this application in response to the FPRF research on this topic in 2011, the proper installation of the sprinklers below the beamed ceilings needs to be addressed in the installation chapter of NFPA 13R and 13D. These proposals address the deflector distance below the beams.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Louis Guerrazzi

Organization: National Fire Sprinkler Association

Affilliation: UL/FM/NFSA Standards Review Committee

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 28 11:01:52 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

39 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 48 of 298

Page 54: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 70-NFPA 13D-2016 [ New Section after 8.2.1.2 ]

Add new section in NFPA 13 D, to allow the positioning of sprinklers within a compartment whichis described by section 10.2 in the Number of Design Sprinklers section.

8.2.1.3 Residential Pendent sprinklers shall be permitted to be installed under or adjacent to beams inaccordance with one of the following installation criteria:

a.) Pendent, recesses pendent and concealed sprinklers shall be permitted to be installeddirectly under a beam with a maximum depth of 14” without regard to the ceiling to deflectordistance.

b.) Pendent sprinklers, including flush type pendent sprinklers, shall be permitted to beinstalled adjacent to beams when the vertical centerline of the sprinkler is no greater than2-inches from the edge of the beam and the deflector or heat collector distance below the beamis installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s published documentation.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

The recent elimination of the specific UL test protocol and criteria for sloped ceiling configurations has caused confusion as to the type and position of sprinklers allowed certain configurations described in the Number of Design Sprinklers section. Current guidelines, which are limited in detail and are open to interpretation, clarification on the positioning of sprinklers to take advantage of section 10.2 is required as the standard currently leaves much open to interpretation.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: John Desrosier

Organization: Tyco Fire Pro

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 28 16:08:47 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

40 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 49 of 298

Page 55: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 69-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 8.2.2.2 ]

8.2.2.2

Sidewall sprinklers that have been listed with specific positioning criteria deflector to ceiling distances shallbe installed in accordance with their listing.

Also Add Section

8.2.2.4 Residential sidewall shall be permitted to be installed at the peak of the ceiling spraying down theslope, or along the wall spraying across the slope as long as the spacing is in accordance with themanufacturer’s design guidelines.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Clarify the intent of section 8.2.2.2 and add new section in NFPA 13 D, to allow the positioning of sprinklers within a compartment which is described by section 10.2 in the Number of Design Sprinklers section.The recent elimination of the specific UL test protocol and criteria for sloped ceiling configurations has caused confusion as to the type and position of sprinklers allowed certain configurations described in the Number of Design Sprinklers section. Current guidelines, which are limited in detail and are open to interpretation, clarification on the positioning of sprinklers to take advantage of section 10.2 is required as the standard currently leaves much open to interpretation.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: John Desrosier

Organization: Tyco Fire Pro

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 28 16:04:13 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

41 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 50 of 298

Page 56: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 72-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 8.2.5.3.3 ]

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

42 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 51 of 298

Page 57: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

8.2.5.3.3

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

43 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 52 of 298

Page 58: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Sprinklers shall be positioned with respect to an obstruction against a wall in accordance with Figure8.2.5.3.3(a) or Figure 8.2.5.3.3(b) .

Figure 8.2.5.3.3(a) Positioning of Sprinkler to Avoid Obstruction Against Walls (Residential Uprightand Pendent Spray Sprinklers).

Figure 8.2.5.3.3(b) Positioning of Sprinkler to Avoid Obstruction Against Walls (ResidentialUpright and Pendent Spray Sprinklers).

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

44 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 53 of 298

Page 59: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Additional Proposed Changes

File Name Description Approved

Revise_Figure_8.2.5.3.3_b_.jpg New Method of Measuring for figure 2

Revise_Figure_8.2.5.3.3_b_.pdf Description of revision

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Revise Figure 8.2.5.3.3 (b) (FIGURE 1) so that the ‘B” dimension is measured from the outmost corner of an obstruction to a point perpendicular on the ceiling. (FIGURE 2)Reasoning:The point of the allowance is to find a distance far enough away from an obstruction to clear the bottom of the obstruction and provide fire protection below it. On flat ceilings the ‘B’ distance is static. In sloped applications the ‘B’ distance changes each time you arrive at a new ‘A’ distance.The equation does not work unless you already have the sprinkler in position. In Figure 2, the B distance is static and the designer or installer can arrive at a distance without first needing to know where the sprinkler is.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Dan Hubbard

Organization: Uponor Inc

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 28 17:01:53 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

45 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 54 of 298

Page 60: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Page 55 of 298

Page 61: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Revise Figure 8.2.5.3.3 (b) (FIGURE 1) so that the ‘B” dimension is measured from the outmost corner of 

an obstruction to a point perpendicular on the ceiling. (FIGURE 2) 

Reasoning: 

The point of the allowance is to find a distance far enough away from an obstruction to clear the bottom 

of the obstruction and provide fire protection below it.   

On flat ceilings the ‘B’ distance is static. In sloped applications the ‘B’ distance changes each time you 

arrive at a new ‘A’ distance. 

The equation does not work unless you already have the sprinkler in position.  

 

In Figure 2, the B distance is static and the designer or installer can arrive at a distance without first 

needing to know where the sprinkler is. 

FIGURE 1  FIGURE 2

Page 56 of 298

Page 62: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 12-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 8.2.5.4.2 ]

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

46 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 57 of 298

Page 63: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

8.2.5.4.2

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

47 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 58 of 298

Page 64: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Sprinklers shall be positioned with respect to continuous obstructions in accordance with Table8.2.5.4.2(a), Figure 8.2.5.4.2(a), Table 8.2.5.4.2(b), Figure 8.2.5.4.2(b, and Figure 8.2.5.4.2(b c )) .

Table 8.2.5.4.2(a) Positioning of Sprinklers to Avoid Obstructions (Residential Sidewall Sprinklers)

Distance from Sidewall

Sprinkler to Side of

Obstruction ( A )

Maximum Allowable Distance of Deflector Above Bottom ofObstruction (in.) ( B )

Less than 8 ft (2400 mm) Not allowed

8 ft (2400 mm) to less than 10 ft(3000 mm)

1 (25 mm)

10 ft (3000 mm) to less than 11 ft(3300 mm)

2 (50 mm)

11 ft (3300 mm) to less than 12 ft(3600 mm)

3 (75 mm)

12 ft (3600 mm) to less than 13 ft(3900 mm)

4 (100 mm)

13 ft (3900 mm) to less than 14 ft(4200 mm)

6 (150 mm)

14 ft (4200 mm) to less than 15 ft(4500 mm)

7 (175 mm)

15 ft (4500 mm) to less than 16 ft(4800 mm)

9 (225 mm)

16 ft (4800 mm) to less than 17 ft(5100 mm)

11 (275 mm)

17 ft (5100 mm) or greater 14 (350 mm)

Note: For A and B, refer to Figure 8.2.5.4.2(a).

Table 8.2.5.4.2(b) Positioning of Sprinklers to Avoid Obstructions Along Wall (Residential SidewallSprinklers)

Distance from Sidewall Sprinkler to Side of

Obstruction ( A )

Maximum Allowable Distance of Deflector

Above Bottom of

Obstruction (in.) ( B )

Less than 1 ft 6 in. (450 mm) 0

1 ft 6 in. (450 mm) to less than 3 ft (900 mm) 1 (25 mm)

3 ft (900 mm) to less than 4 ft (1200 mm) 3 (75 mm)

4 ft (1200 mm) to less than 4 ft 6 in. (1350 mm) 5 (125 mm)

4 ft 6 in. (1350 mm) to less than 6 ft (1850 mm) 7 (175 mm)

6 ft (1850 mm) to less than 6 ft 6 in. (1950 mm) 9 (225 mm)

6 ft 6 in. (1950 mm) to less than 7 ft (2100 mm) 11 (275 mm)

7 ft to (2100 mm) less than 7 ft 6 in. (2250 mm) 14 (350 mm)

Note: For A and B, refer to Figure 8.2.5.4.2(b).

Figure 8.2.5.4.2(a) Positioning of Sprinkler to Avoid Obstruction (Residential Sidewall Sprinklers).

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

48 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 59 of 298

Page 65: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Figure 8.2.5.4.2(b) Positioning of Sprinkler to Avoid Obstruction Along Wall (Residential SidewallSprinklers).

Additional Proposed Changes

File Name Description Approved

NFPA_13D_Fig._8.2.5.4.2_c_.pdf 8.2.5.4.2(c)

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

It appears the committee forgot to add this detail to NFPA 13D. It is found in NFPA 13R.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Feb 23 13:43:42 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

49 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 60 of 298

Page 66: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Ceiling or roof

Wall

Obstruction

Elevation view

Wall

NO MINIMUM

30 in. (760 mm)

maximum

30 in. (760 mm)

maximum

FIGURE 8.2.5.4.2(c) Positioning of Sprinkler to AvoidObstructions Against Wall (Residential Sidewall Sprinklers).

Page 61 of 298

Page 67: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 50-NFPA 13D-2016 [ New Section after 8.2.5.6 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Type your content here ...   Shadow areas in corridors up to 2   (0.61 m) in depth and up to 9   (2.7 m) in length

behind sidewall sprinklers shall be permi ed as shown in Figure   XXXX (Current 13R: Figure 6.4.6.3.3.2)

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

This change aligns the two related sections from 13D & 13R.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Mark Fessenden

Organization: Tyco Fire Protection Products

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 23 15:18:42 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

50 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 62 of 298

Page 68: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 87-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 8.2.5.6 ]

8.2.5.6* Shadow Areas.

Shadow areas shall be permitted in the protection area of a an individual sprinkler as long as the

cumulative dry areas do not exceed 15 ft2 (1.4 m2) per sprinkler.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Shadow area as defined in Section 3.3.9 and use here is intended to apply to the spray pattern of the individual sprinkler.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Lynn Nielson

Organization: City Of Henderson

Affilliation: Self

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 14:27:31 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

51 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 63 of 298

Page 69: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 20-NFPA 13D-2016 [ New Section after 8.2.7 ]

8.2.7.1

In all compartments that are not larger than 400 ft 3 (11.33 m 3 ), pendent, upright and sidewall residentialsprinklers shall be permitted to be installed at the highest ceiling level without regard to obstructions.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

In the 2016 edition, this section was modified. The allowance to have a sprinkler 18" down was added. However there was a requirement added that it had to be enclosed by walls and a door. There are many small hallways that are technically compartments with openings with adequate lintels that usually have a light in the center and this would allow the light to not be an obstruction. This is not new language as this is how it read in the 2013 edition and prior.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu May 26 09:49:52 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

52 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 64 of 298

Page 70: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 19-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 8.2.7 ]

8.2.7 Closets and Small Compartments .

In all closets and compartments that are enclosed by walls and a door and that are smaller than 400 ft3

(11.3 m3), including those housing mechanical equipment, pendent, upright, and sidewall residentialsprinklers shall be permitted to be installed in either of the following situations:

(1) Within 18 in. (460 mm) of the ceiling to avoid obstructions near the ceiling

(2) At the highest ceiling level without regard to obstructions or minimum distances to wall

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

This applies to small compartments as well

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu May 26 09:49:00 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

53 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 65 of 298

Page 71: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 53-NFPA 13D-2016 [ New Section after 8.3.4 ]

8.3.5

Sprinklers shall not be required in an enclosed swimming pool room when provided with a minimum of oneexit door exiting directly to the exterior.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Enclosed swimming pools generally have a low or no fuel content much less than garages, porches and similar structures including other rooms within the dwelling that are exempt. The majority of the room is water. Limited access to ceiling sprinklers for the purpose of installation and maintenance is difficult. Unique ceiling skylights and or soffiting makes listing requirements difficult to achieve.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Maurice Pilette

Organization: Mechanical Designs Ltd.

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 23 20:33:50 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

54 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 66 of 298

Page 72: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 85-NFPA 13D-2016 [ New Section after 8.3.4 ]

8.3.4.1 Attached garages with any habitable rooms above shall be required to be protected with firesprinklers.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

A fire in a garage without fire sprinklers with habitable rooms above it can undermine the structural integrity of the habitable rooms above and increase the risk of occupants within those rooms not being able to exit the structure safely.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Lynn Nielson

Organization: City Of Henderson

Affilliation: Self

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 14:08:18 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

55 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 67 of 298

Page 73: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 57-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 8.3.5.1.2 ]

8.3.5.1.2 *

Where fuel-fired equipment is below or on the same level as occupied areas of the dwelling unit, at leastone quick-response intermediate temperature sprinkler shall be installed above the equipment or at the wallseparating the space with the fuel-fired equipment from the occupied space.

Add annex section:

A.8.3.5.1.2. Where a chimney or flue from a fuel-fired equipment passes through a concealed space, it isnot required to locate a sprinkler in this concealed space.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Some AHJ’s are using this section to require sprinklers in attic adjacent to the chimney for the fuel fired equipment below. This section is intended to apply to the actual fuel-fired equipment and not to the chimney where it passes through the attic. This Annex section will clarify.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 76-NFPA 13D-2016 [New Section after A.8.3.4]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Roland Asp

Organization: National Fire Sprinkler Association

Affilliation: NFSA E&S Committee

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Jun 27 23:13:57 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

56 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 68 of 298

Page 74: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 44-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 8.3.6 ]

8.3.6

Sprinklers shall not be required in covered, unheated projections of the building at entrances/exits as longas the dwelling unit has another means of egress exit .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

The term “egress” can result in the additional cost and complexity of a dry sprinkler being required even though additional exits are available, but may not meet the strict definition of “egress” as defined in the International Residential Code.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Melisa Rodriguez

Organization: Uponor

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 23 09:19:23 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

57 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 69 of 298

Page 75: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 13-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 8.3.7 ]

8.3.7

Sprinklers shall not be required for unprotected ceiling pockets that meet the following conditions:

(1) The total volume of all unprotected ceiling pockets in a compartment does not exceed 100 ft3

(2.8 m3).

(2) The entire floor under the unprotected ceiling pocket is protected by the sprinklers at the lower ceilingelevation.

(3)

(4) Skylights not exceeding 32 ft2 (3 m2) shall be permitted to have a plastic cover.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

The charging statement should include the term "unprotected ceiling pocket" as the criteria in 1-3 refer to unprotected ceiling pocket(s).

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Feb 23 13:56:13 EST 2016

* The interior finish of the unprotected ceiling pocket excluding decorative treatments isnoncombustible or limited-combustible material.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

58 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 70 of 298

Page 76: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 46-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 9.2.2.1 [Excluding any Sub-Sections] ]

Except as permitted in 9.2.2.3 2 , antifreeze solutions shall be listed for use in new sprinkler systems.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

It would appear that stating “Except as permitted in 9.2.2.3…” might have been in error as it only refers to the concentration of the antifreeze solutions being limited to the minimum necessary. Instead 9.2.2.2 is referring to limited applications where antifreeze may be considered and only by the permission of the AHJ.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Melisa Rodriguez

Organization: Uponor

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 23 09:24:46 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

59 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 71 of 298

Page 77: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 62-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 9.2.2.3 ]

9.2.2. 3 2.2

The concentration of antifreeze solutions shall be limited to the minimum necessary for the anticipatedminimum temperature.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Renumber this section and change pointer for using non listed antifreeze

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 28 11:47:20 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

60 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 72 of 298

Page 78: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 36-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 9.3.4 ]

9.3.4 Location and Protection of Dry Pipe and Preaction Valves.

The dry pipe valve, preaction valve, and supply pipe shall be protected against freezing and mechanicalinjury physical damage .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Sprinkler system components do not get injured; they get damaged. This clarifies the provision.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Jim Muir

Organization: Building Safety Division, Clark County, Washington

Affilliation: NFPAs Building Code Development Committee (BCDC)

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 16 17:27:51 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

61 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 73 of 298

Page 79: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 11-NFPA 13D-2016 [ New Section after 10.1.1 ]

10.1.2

Sprinkler criteria outside of dwelling unit. Where sprinklers are required outside of the dwelling unit theyshall be designed to provide a minimum discharge density of 0.05 gpm/ft² (2.04 mm/min).

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Section 8.3 indicates the locations that sprinklers can be omitted. Some AHJ's require sprinkler protection be provided in garages and on porches and similar areas outside of dwelling units. Sometimes the use of other than a residential sprinkler is mandated. This will only require that a .05 Gpm/ft² be provided. This is similar to the provision found in NFPA 13R section 7.3.3.1 (3).

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Feb 23 12:48:48 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

62 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 74 of 298

Page 80: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 38-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 10.2.3 ]

10.2.3

For situations not meeting any one of the conditions in 10.2.1, residential sprinklers listed for use inspecific ceiling configurations shall be permitted to be used in accordance with their listing.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

This provides clarification.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 37-NFPA 13D-2016 [Section No. 10.2.4]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Jim Muir

Organization: Building Safety Division, Clark County, Washington

Affilliation: NFPA's Building Code Development Committee (BCDC)

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 16 17:32:20 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

63 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 75 of 298

Page 81: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 37-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 10.2.4 ]

10.2.4*

For situations not meeting one of the conditions in 10.2.1 and or 10.2.3, the number of sprinklers in thedesign area shall be determined in consultation with the authority having jurisdiction as appropriate for theconditions.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

It is believed that one of the conditions in either 10.2.1 or 10.2.3 should be the trigger, rather than one of the conditions in both 10.2.1 and 10.2.3.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 38-NFPA 13D-2016 [Section No. 10.2.3]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Jim Muir

Organization: Building Safety Division, Clark County, Washington

Affilliation: NFPA's Building Code Development Committee (BCDC)

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 16 17:30:12 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

64 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 76 of 298

Page 82: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 49-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 10.4.4 ]

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

65 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 77 of 298

Page 83: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

10.4.4 * General Pipe Sizing Method.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

66 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 78 of 298

Page 84: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

The following is the general pipe sizing method for straight-run systems connected to a city water main of atleast 4 in. (100 mm) in diameter in accordance with 10.4.3(1):

(1) The system flow rate shall be established in accordance with Sections 10.1 and 10.2, and it shall bedetermined that the flow allowed by the water meter meets or exceeds the system demand and thatthe total demand flow does not exceed the maximum flow allowed by the piping system components.

(2) The water pressure in the street shall be determined.

(3) Pipe sizes shall be selected.

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8) Pressure loss for elevation shall be deducted as follows:

(9) Building height above street (ft) × 0.433 = pressure loss (psi)

(10) Building height above street (m) × 0.098 = pressure loss (bar)

(11)

(12) Pressure loss for piping within the building shall be deducted by multiplying the pressure lossassociated with the pipe material by the total length(s) of pipe in feet (meters).

(13) Pressure loss for valves and fittings shall be deducted as follows:

(14) The valves and fittings from the control valve to the farthest sprinkler shall be counted.

(15) The equivalent length for each valve and fitting as shown in Table 10.4.4(b) , Table 10.4.4(c) ,Table 10.4.4(d),

or

(a) Table 10.4.4(e) or   or as specified by the manufacturer   shall be determined and the valuesadded to obtain the total equivalent length for each pipe size. The friction loss for a flow straightthrough tee or cross shall only be included in calculations performed in accordance with 10.4.9.

(b) The equivalent length for each size shall be multiplied by the pressure loss associated with thepipe material and the values totaled.

(16) In multilevel buildings, the steps in 10.4.4(1) through 10.4.4(8) shall be repeated to size piping foreach floor.

(17) If the remaining pressure is less than the operating pressure established by the testing laboratory forthe sprinkler being used, the sprinkler system shall be redesigned.

(18) If the remaining pressure is higher than required, smaller piping shall be permitted to be used wherejustified by calculations.

(19) The remaining piping shall be sized the same as the piping up to and including the farthest sprinklerunless smaller pipe sizes are justified by calculations.

Table 10.4.4(a) Pressure Losses in psi in Water Meters

Meter Size

(in.)

Flow (gpm) (L/min)

18 or less (68) 23 (87) 26 (98) 31 (117) 39 (148) 52 (197)

5 ⁄ 8 (15 mm) 9 (0.67 bar) 14 (0.97 bar) 18 (1.2 bar) 26 (1.8 bar) 38 (2.6 bar) *

* Pressure loss for a water meter, if any, shall be determined and deducted using one of the following:

Table 10.4.4(a) shall be permitted to be used, even where the sprinkler demand flow exceedsthe meter's rated continuous flow.

Higher pressure losses specified by the manufacturer shall be used in place of those specifiedin Table 10.4.4(a) .

Lower pressure losses shall be permitted to be used where supporting data are provided by themeter manufacturer.

* Pressure losses from the city main to the inside control valve shall be deducted by multiplying thepressure loss associated with the pipe material by the total length(s) of pipe in feet (meters).

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

67 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 79 of 298

Page 85: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Meter Size

(in.)

Flow (gpm) (L/min)

18 or less (68) 23 (87) 26 (98) 31 (117) 39 (148) 52 (197)

3 ⁄ 4 (20 mm) 7 (0.48 bar) 11 (0.76 bar) 14 (1.5 bar) 22 (1.5 bar) 35 (2.4 bar) *

1 (25 mm) 2 (0.14 bar) 3 (0.21 bar) 3 (0.21 bar) 4 (0.28 bar) 6 (0.41 bar) 10 (0.69 bar)

1 1 ⁄ 2 (40 mm) 1 (0.07 bar) 1 (0.07 bar) 2 (0.14 bar) 2 (0.14 bar) 4 (0.28 bar) 7 (0.48 bar)

2 (50 mm) 1 (0.07 bar) 1 (0.07 bar) 1 (0.07 bar) 1 (0.07 bar) 2 (0.14 bar) 3 (0.21 bar)

For SI units, 1 gpm = 3.785 L/min; 1 in. = 25 mm; 1 psi = 0.07 bar.

*Above maximum rated flow of commonly available meters.

Table 10.4.4(b) Equivalent Length in Feet of Fittings and Valves for Schedule 40 Steel Pipe

Diameter

(in.)

45

DegreeElbow

90

DegreeElbow

Long-RadiusElbow

Tee orCross(flow

turned90

degrees)

Tee orCross(flow

straightthrough)

GateValve

AngleValve

GlobeValve

Globe“Y”

PatternValve

CockValve

CheckValve

1 (25mm)

1 (0.3m)

2 (0.6m)

2 (0.6m)

5 (1.5 m) 2 (0.6 m) 012

(3.7m)

28(8.5m)

15 (4.6m)

4 (1.2m)

5 (1.5m)

1 1 ⁄ 4(32 mm)

1 (0.3m)

3 (0.9m)

2 (0.6m)

6 (1.8 m) 2 (0.6 m) 015

(4.6m)

35(10.7m)

18 (5.5m)

5 (1.5m)

7 (2.1m)

1 1 ⁄ 2(40 mm

2 (0.6m)

4 (1.2m)

2 (0.6m)

8 (2.4 m) 3 (0.9 m) 018

(5.5m)

43(13.1m)

22 (6.7m)

6 (1.8m)

9 (2.7m)

2 (50mm)

2 (0.6m)

5 (1.5m)

3 (0.9m)

10 (3 m) 3 (0.9 m)1 (0.3

m)

24(7.3m)

57(17.4m)

28 (8.5m)

7 (2.1m)

11 (3.3m)

For SI units, 1 in. = 25 mm; 1 ft = 0.3 m.

Table 10.4.4(c) Equivalent Length in Feet of Fittings and Valves for Type K Copper Tube

Diameter(in.)

45DegreeElbow

90DegreeElbow

Long-

RadiusElbow

Tee orCross(flow

turned90

degrees)

Tee orCross(flow

straightthrough)

GateValve

AngleValve

GlobeValve

Globe“Y”

PatternValve

CockValve

CheckValve

3 ⁄ 4(20 mm)

01 (0.3

m)0 3 (0.9 m) 1 (0.3 m) 0

7 (2.1m)

14(4.3m)

7 (2.1m)

2 (0.6m)

0

1 (25mm)

1 (0.3m)

2 (0.6m)

2 (0.6m)

6 (1.8 m) 2 (0.6 m) 014

(4.3m)

33 (10m)

18 (5.5m)

5 (1.5m)

6 (1.8m)

1 1 ⁄ 4(32 mm)

1 (0.3m)

3 (0.9m)

2 (0.6m)

5 (1.5 m) 2 (0.6 m) 014

(4.3m)

32(9.8m)

16 (4.9m)

5 (1.5m)

6 (1.8m)

1 1 ⁄ 2(40 mm)

2 (0.6m)

4 (1.2m)

2 (0.6m)

8 (2.4 m) 3 (0.9 m) 018

(5.5m)

43(13.1m)

22 (6.7m)

6 (1.8m)

9 (2.7m)

2 (50mm)

2 (0.6m)

6 (1.8m)

3 (0.9m)

12 (3.7 m) 4 (1.2 m)1 (0.3

m)

28(8.5m)

66(20.1m)

33 (10m)

8 (2.4m)

13 (4m)

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

68 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 80 of 298

Page 86: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

For SI units, 1 in. = 25 mm; 1 ft = 0.3 m.

Table 10.4.4(d) Equivalent Length in Feet of Fittings and Valves for Type L Copper Tube

Diameter(in.)

45DegreeElbow

90DegreeElbow

Long-RadiusElbow

Tee orCross(flow

turned90

degrees)

Tee orCross(flow

straightthrough)

GateValve

AngleValve

GlobeValve

Globe“Y”

PatternValve

CockValve

CheckValve

3 ⁄ 4(20 mm)

02 (0.6

m)0 4 (1.2 m) 1 (0.3 m) 0

8 (2.4m)

18(5.5m)

10 (3m)

3 (0.9m)

0

1 (25mm)

1 (0.3m)

3 (0.9m)

3 (0.9m)

7 (2.1 m) 2 (0.6 m) 016

(4.9m)

38(11.6m)

20 (6.1m)

5 (2.1m)

7 (2.1m)

1 1 ⁄ 4(32 mm)

1 (0.3m)

3 (0.9m)

2 (0.6m)

6 (1.8 m) 2 (0.6 m) 015

(4.6m)

35(10.7m)

18 (5.5m)

5 (1.5m)

7 (2.1m)

1 1 ⁄ 2(40 mm)

2 (0.6m)

4 (1.2m)

2 (0.6m)

9 (2.7 m) 3 (0.9 m) 020

(6.1m)

47(14.3m)

24 (7.3m)

7 (2.1m)

10 (3m)

2 (50mm)

2 (0.6m)

6 (1.8m)

4 (1.2m)

12 (3.7 m) 4 (1.2 m)1 (0.3

m)

30(9.1m)

71(21.6m)

35(10.7m)

9 (2.7m)

14 (4.3m)

For SI units, 1 in. = 25 mm; 1 ft = 0.3 m.

Table 10.4.4(e) Equivalent Length in Feet of Fittings and Valves for Type M Copper Tube

Diameter(in.)

45DegreeElbow

90DegreeElbow

Long-RadiusElbow

Tee orCross(flow

turned90

degrees)

Tee orCross(flow

straightthrough)

GateValve

AngleValve

GlobeValve

Globe“Y”

PatternValve

CockValve

CheckValve

3 ⁄ 4(20 mm)

02 (0.6

m)0 4 (1.2 m) 1 (0.3 m 0

10 (3m)

21(6.4m)

11 (3.3m)

3 (0.9m)

0

1 (25mm)

2 (0.6m)

3 (0.9m)

3 (0.9m)

8 (2.4 m) 3 (0.9 m) 019

(5.8m)

43(13.1m)

23 (7m)

6 (1.8m)

8 (2.1m)

1 1 ⁄ 4(32 mm)

1 (0.3m)

3 (0.9m)

2 (0.6m)

7 (2.1 m) 2 (0.6 m) 016

(4.9m)

38(11.5m)

20 (6.1m)

5 (1.5m)

8 (2.4m)

1 1 ⁄ 2(40 mm)

2 (0.6m)

5 (1.5m)

2 (0.6m)

9 (2.7 m) 3 (0.9 m) 021

(6.4m)

50(15.2m)

26 (7.9m)

7 (2.1m)

11 (3.3m)

2 (50mm)

3 (0.9m)

7 (2.1m)

4 (1.2m)

13 (4 m) 5 (1.5 m)1 (0.3

m)

32(9.8m)

75(22.9m)

37 (11.3m)

9 (2.7m)

14 (4.3m)

For SI units, 1 in. = 25 mm; 1 ft = 0.3048 m.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Revision clarifies that the friction loss for a flow straight through tee or cross is only required when performing calculations using the Prescriptive Pipe Sizing Method and is not required when hydraulic calculations are performed.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

69 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 81 of 298

Page 87: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Mark Fessenden

Organization: Tyco Fire Protection Products

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 23 14:57:57 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

70 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 82 of 298

Page 88: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 15-NFPA 13D-2016 [ New Section after 10.4.6 ]

10.4.6.1

Where the water supply is a public or private water main 4 in (100 mm) nominal in size or larger, only thestatic pressure measured at the main shall be required for performing hydraulic calculations.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

For a 2 sprinkler design, the demand point on the water supply curve with a 4" or larger main will generally be very close to the static. Using the static pressure only for grid calculations should be allowed.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 16-NFPA 13D-2016 [New Section after 10.4.7]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Mar 23 15:56:10 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

71 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 83 of 298

Page 89: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 16-NFPA 13D-2016 [ New Section after 10.4.7 ]

10.4.7.1

Where the water supply is a public or private water main 4 in (100 mm) nominal in size or larger, only thestatic pressure measured at the main shall be required for performing hydraulic calculations.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

For a 2 sprinkler design, the demand point on the water supply curve with a 4" or larger main will generally be very close to the static. Using the static pressure only for loop calculations should be allowed.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 15-NFPA 13D-2016 [New Section after 10.4.6]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Mar 23 16:06:44 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

72 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 84 of 298

Page 90: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 47-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. 10.4.9.2 ]

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

73 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 85 of 298

Page 91: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

10.4.9.2 Calculation Procedure.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

74 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 86 of 298

Page 92: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Determination of the required size for water distribution piping shall be in accordance with the followingprocedure:

(1) Step 1 — Determine Psup . Obtain the static supply pressure that will be available from the water

main from the water purveyor or from a private source, such as a tank system, a private well system, ora combination of these. For a private source, the available water supply pressure shall be based on theminimum pressure control setting for the pump.

(2) Step 2 — Determine PLsvc . Use Table 10.4.9.2(a) to determine the pressure loss in the water service

pipe based on the selected size of the water service.

(3) Step 3 — Determine PLm . Use Table 10.4.4(a) to determine the pressure loss from the water meter

based on the selected water meter size. Where the actual water meter pressure loss is known, PLmshall be the actual loss.

(4) Step 4 — Determine PLd . Determine the pressure loss from devices, other than the water meter,

installed in the piping system supplying sprinklers, such as pressure-reducing valves, backflowpreventers, water softeners, or water filters, taking into account the following:

(5) Device pressure losses shall be based on the device manufacturer's specifications.

(6) The flow rate used to determine pressure loss shall be the rate from Section 10.1 , except that5 gpm (20 L/min) shall be added where the device is installed in a water service pipe that suppliesmore than one dwelling.

(7) As an alternative to deducting pressure loss for a device, an automatic bypass valve shall beinstalled to divert flow around the device when a sprinkler activates.

(8) Step 5 — Determine PLe . Use Table 10.4.9.2(b) to determine the pressure loss associated with

changes in elevation. The elevation used in applying the table shall be the difference between theelevation where the water source pressure was measured and the elevation of the highest sprinkler.

(9) Step 6 — Determine PLsp . Determine the maximum pressure required by any individual sprinkler

based on the following:

(10) The area of coverage

(11) The ceiling configuration

(12) The temperature rating

(13) Any additional conditions specified by the sprinkler manufacturer

(14) Step 7 — Calculate PLt . Using the equation in 10.4.9.1, calculate the pressure available to offset

friction loss in water distribution piping between the service valve and the sprinklers.

(15) Step 8 — Determine the maximum allowable pipe length. Use Table 10.4.9.2(c) through Table10.4.9.2(h) to select a material and size for water distribution piping. The piping material and size shallbe acceptable if the developed length of pipe between the service valve and the most remote sprinklerdoes not exceed the maximum allowable length specified by the applicable table. Interpolation of Ptbetween the tabular values shall be permitted.

Table 10.4.9.2(a) Water Service Pressure Loss (PLsvc)

FlowRate*(gpm)

3⁄4 in. Water ServicePressure Loss (psi)

1 in. Water Service PressureLoss

(psi)

1 1⁄4 in. Water ServicePressure Loss (psi)

40 ftor

less

41 ftto 75

ft

76 ftto 100

ft

101 ftto 150

ft

40 ftor

less

41 ftto 75

ft

76 ftto 100

ft

101 ftto 150

ft

40 ftor

less

41 ftto 75

ft

76 ftto 100

ft

101 ftto 150

ft

8 5.1 8.7 11.8 17.4 1.5 2.5 3.4 5.1 0.6 1.0 1.3 1.9

10 7.7 13.1 17.8 26.3 2.3 3.8 5.2 7.7 0.8 1.4 2.0 2.9

12 10.8 18.4 24.9 NP 3.2 5.4 7.3 10.7 1.2 2.0 2.7 4.0

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

75 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 87 of 298

Page 93: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

FlowRate*(gpm)

3⁄4 in. Water ServicePressure Loss (psi)

1 in. Water Service PressureLoss

(psi)

1 1⁄4 in. Water ServicePressure Loss (psi)

40 ftor

less

41 ftto 75

ft

76 ftto 100

ft

101 ftto 150

ft

40 ftor

less

41 ftto 75

ft

76 ftto 100

ft

101 ftto 150

ft

40 ftor

less

41 ftto 75

ft

76 ftto 100

ft

101 ftto 150

ft

14 14.4 24.5 NP NP 4.2 7.1 9.6 14.3 1.6 2.7 3.6 5.4

16 18.4 NP NP NP 5.4 9.1 12.4 18.3 2.0 3.4 4.7 6.9

18 22.9 NP NP NP 6.7 11.4 15.4 22.7 2.5 4.3 5.8 8.6

20 27.8 NP NP NP 8.1 13.8 18.7 27.6 3.1 5.2 7.0 10.4

22 NP NP NP NP 9.7 16.5 22.3 NP 3.7 6.2 8.4 12.4

24 NP NP NP NP 11.4 19.3 26.2 NP 4.3 7.3 9.9 14.6

26 NP NP NP NP 13.2 22.4 NP NP 5.0 8.5 11.4 16.9

28 NP NP NP NP 15.1 25.7 NP NP 5.7 9.7 13.1 19.4

30 NP NP NP NP 17.2 NP NP NP 6.5 11.0 14.9 22.0

32 NP NP NP NP 19.4 NP NP NP 7.3 12.4 16.8 24.8

34 NP NP NP NP 21.7 NP NP NP 8.2 13.9 18.8 NP

36 NP NP NP NP 24.1 NP NP NP 9.1 15.4 20.9 NP

NP: Not permitted. Pressure loss exceeds reasonable limits.

Notes:

(1) Values are applicable for underground piping materials permitted by the local plumbing code and arebased on an SDR of 11 and a Hazen-Williams C factor of 150.

(2) Values include the following length allowances for fittings: 25 percent length increase for actual lengthsup to 100 ft (30.5 m) and 15 percent length increase for actual lengths over 100 ft (30.5 m).

*Flow rate from Sections 10.1 and 10.2. Add 5 gpm (18.9 lpm) to the flow rate required by 10.4.9.2, Step 4,where the water service pipe supplies more than one dwelling.

Table 10.4.9.2(b) Elevation Loss (PLe)

Elevation (ft)(m) Pressure Loss (psi)(bar)

5 (1.5) 2.2 (0.15)

10 (3) 4.4 (0.30)

15 (4.6) 6.5(0.45)

20 (6.1) 8.7 (0.6)

25 (7.6) 10.9 (0.75)

30 (9.1) 13.0 (0.89)

35 (10.7) 15.2 (1.0)

40 (12.2) 17.4 (1.2)

Table 10.4.9.2(c) Allowable Pipe Length for ¾ in. Type M Copper Water Tubing

Sprinkler FlowRate*

(gpm)

Water DistributionSize

(in.)

Available Pressure, P t (psi)

15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60

Allowable Length of Pipe from Service Valve to FarthestSprinkler (ft)

8 3⁄4 217 289 361 434 506 578 650 723 795 867

9 3⁄4 174 232 291 349 407 465 523 581 639 697

10 3⁄4 143 191 239 287 335 383 430 478 526 574

11 3⁄4 120 160 200 241 281 321 361 401 441 481

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

76 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 88 of 298

Page 94: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Sprinkler FlowRate*

(gpm)

Water DistributionSize

(in.)

Available Pressure, P t (psi)

15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60

Allowable Length of Pipe from Service Valve to FarthestSprinkler (ft)

12 3⁄4 102 137 171 205 239 273 307 341 375 410

13 3⁄4 88 118 147 177 206 235 265 294 324 353

14 3⁄4 77 103 128 154 180 205 231 257 282 308

15 3⁄4 68 90 113 136 158 181 203 226 248 271

16 3⁄4 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 241

17 3⁄4 54 72 90 108 125 143 161 179 197 215

18 3⁄4 48 64 81 97 113 129 145 161 177 193

19 3⁄4 44 58 73 88 102 117 131 146 160 175

20 3⁄4 40 53 66 80 93 106 119 133 146 159

21 3⁄4 36 48 61 73 85 97 109 121 133 145

22 3⁄4 33 44 56 67 78 89 100 111 122 133

23 3⁄4 31 41 51 61 72 82 92 102 113 123

24 3⁄4 28 38 47 57 66 76 85 95 104 114

25 3⁄4 26 35 44 53 61 70 79 88 97 105

26 3⁄4 24 33 41 49 57 65 73 82 90 98

27 3⁄4 23 30 38 46 53 61 69 76 84 91

28 3⁄4 21 28 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85

29 3⁄4 20 27 33 40 47 53 60 67 73 80

30 3⁄4 19 25 31 38 44 50 56 63 69 75

31 3⁄4 18 24 29 35 41 47 53 59 65 71

32 3⁄4 17 22 28 33 39 44 50 56 61 67

33 3⁄4 16 21 26 32 37 42 47 53 58 63

34 3⁄4 NP 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60

35 3⁄4 NP 19 24 28 33 38 42 47 52 57

36 3⁄4 NP 18 22 27 31 36 40 45 49 54

37 3⁄4 NP 17 21 26 30 34 38 43 47 51

38 3⁄4 NP 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 45 49

39 3⁄4 NP 15 19 23 27 31 35 39 42 46

40 3⁄4 NP NP 18 22 26 29 33 37 40 44

NP: Not permitted.

*Flow rate from Sections 10.1 and 10.2.

Table 10.4.9.2(d) Allowable Pipe Length for 1 in. Type M Copper Water Tubing

Sprinkler FlowRate*

(gpm)

Water DistributionSize

(in.)

Available Pressure, P t (psi)

15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60

Allowable Length of Pipe from Service Valve to FarthestSprinkler (ft)

8 1 806 1075 1343 1612 1881 2149 2418 2687 2955 3224

9 1 648 864 1080 1296 1512 1728 1945 2161 2377 2593

10 1 533 711 889 1067 1245 1422 1600 1778 1956 2134

11 1 447 596 745 894 1043 1192 1341 1491 1640 1789

12 1 381 508 634 761 888 1015 1142 1269 1396 1523

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

77 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 89 of 298

Page 95: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Sprinkler FlowRate*

(gpm)

Water DistributionSize

(in.)

Available Pressure, P t (psi)

15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60

Allowable Length of Pipe from Service Valve to FarthestSprinkler (ft)

13 1 328 438 547 657 766 875 985 1094 1204 1313

14 1 286 382 477 572 668 763 859 954 1049 1145

15 1 252 336 420 504 588 672 756 840 924 1008

16 1 224 298 373 447 522 596 671 745 820 894

17 1 200 266 333 400 466 533 600 666 733 799

18 1 180 240 300 360 420 479 539 599 659 719

19 1 163 217 271 325 380 434 488 542 597 651

20 1 148 197 247 296 345 395 444 493 543 592

21 1 135 180 225 270 315 360 406 451 496 541

22 1 124 165 207 248 289 331 372 413 455 496

23 1 114 152 190 228 267 305 343 381 419 457

24 1 106 141 176 211 246 282 317 352 387 422

25 1 98 131 163 196 228 261 294 326 359 392

26 1 91 121 152 182 212 243 273 304 334 364

27 1 85 113 142 170 198 226 255 283 311 340

28 1 79 106 132 159 185 212 238 265 291 318

29 1 74 99 124 149 174 198 223 248 273 298

30 1 70 93 116 140 163 186 210 233 256 280

31 1 66 88 110 132 153 175 197 219 241 263

32 1 62 83 103 124 145 165 186 207 227 248

33 1 59 78 98 117 137 156 176 195 215 234

34 1 55 74 92 111 129 148 166 185 203 222

35 1 53 70 88 105 123 140 158 175 193 210

36 1 50 66 83 100 116 133 150 166 183 199

37 1 47 63 79 95 111 126 142 158 174 190

38 1 45 60 75 90 105 120 135 150 165 181

39 1 43 57 72 86 100 115 129 143 158 172

40 1 41 55 68 82 96 109 123 137 150 164

*Flow rate from Sections 10.1 and 10.2.

Table 10.4.9.2(e) Allowable Pipe Length for ¾ in. CPVC (IPS) Pipe

Sprinkler FlowRate*

(gpm)

Water DistributionSize

(in.)

Available Pressure, P t (psi)

15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60

Allowable Length of Pipe from Service Valve to FarthestSprinkler (ft)

8 3⁄4 348 465 581 697 813 929 1045 1161 1278 1394

9 3⁄4 280 374 467 560 654 747 841 934 1027 1121

10 3⁄4 231 307 384 461 538 615 692 769 845 922

11 3⁄4 193 258 322 387 451 515 580 644 709 773

12 3⁄4 165 219 274 329 384 439 494 549 603 658

13 3⁄4 142 189 237 284 331 378 426 473 520 568

14 3⁄4 124 165 206 247 289 330 371 412 454 495

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

78 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 90 of 298

Page 96: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Sprinkler FlowRate*

(gpm)

Water DistributionSize

(in.)

Available Pressure, P t (psi)

15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60

Allowable Length of Pipe from Service Valve to FarthestSprinkler (ft)

15 3⁄4 109 145 182 218 254 290 327 363 399 436

16 3⁄4 97 129 161 193 226 258 290 322 354 387

17 3⁄4 86 115 144 173 202 230 259 288 317 346

18 3⁄4 78 104 130 155 181 207 233 259 285 311

19 3⁄4 70 94 117 141 164 188 211 234 258 281

20 3⁄4 64 85 107 128 149 171 192 213 235 256

21 3⁄4 58 78 97 117 136 156 175 195 214 234

22 3⁄4 54 71 89 107 125 143 161 179 197 214

23 3⁄4 49 66 82 99 115 132 148 165 181 198

24 3⁄4 46 61 76 91 107 122 137 152 167 183

25 3⁄4 42 56 71 85 99 113 127 141 155 169

26 3⁄4 39 52 66 79 92 105 118 131 144 157

27 3⁄4 37 49 61 73 86 98 110 122 135 147

28 3⁄4 34 46 57 69 80 92 103 114 126 137

29 3⁄4 32 43 54 64 75 86 96 107 118 129

30 3⁄4 30 40 50 60 70 81 91 101 111 121

31 3⁄4 28 38 47 57 66 76 85 95 104 114

32 3⁄4 27 36 45 54 63 71 80 89 98 107

33 3⁄4 25 34 42 51 59 68 76 84 93 101

34 3⁄4 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 88 96

35 3⁄4 23 30 38 45 53 61 68 76 83 91

36 3⁄4 22 29 36 43 50 57 65 72 79 86

37 3⁄4 20 27 34 41 48 55 61 68 75 82

38 3⁄4 20 26 33 39 46 52 59 65 72 78

39 3⁄4 19 25 31 37 43 50 56 62 68 74

40 3⁄4 18 24 30 35 41 47 53 59 65 71

*Flow rate from Sections 10.1 and 10.2.

Table 10.4.9.2(f) Allowable Pipe Length for 1 in. CPVC (IPS) Pipe

Sprinkler FlowRate*

(gpm)

Water DistributionSize

(in.)

Available Pressure, P t (psi)

15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60

Allowable Length of Pipe from Service Valve to FarthestSprinkler (ft)

8 1 1049 1398 1748 2098 2447 2797 3146 3496 3845 4195

9 1 843 1125 1406 1687 1968 2249 2530 2811 3093 3374

10 1 694 925 1157 1388 1619 1851 2082 2314 2545 2776

11 1 582 776 970 1164 1358 1552 1746 1940 2133 2327

12 1 495 660 826 991 1156 1321 1486 1651 1816 1981

13 1 427 570 712 854 997 1139 1281 1424 1566 1709

14 1 372 497 621 745 869 993 1117 1241 1366 1490

15 1 328 437 546 656 765 874 983 1093 1202 1311

16 1 291 388 485 582 679 776 873 970 1067 1164

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

79 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 91 of 298

Page 97: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Sprinkler FlowRate*

(gpm)

Water DistributionSize

(in.)

Available Pressure, P t (psi)

15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60

Allowable Length of Pipe from Service Valve to FarthestSprinkler (ft)

17 1 260 347 433 520 607 693 780 867 954 1040

18 1 234 312 390 468 546 624 702 780 858 936

19 1 212 282 353 423 494 565 635 706 776 847

20 1 193 257 321 385 449 513 578 642 706 770

21 1 176 235 293 352 410 469 528 586 645 704

22 1 161 215 269 323 377 430 484 538 592 646

23 1 149 198 248 297 347 396 446 496 545 595

24 1 137 183 229 275 321 366 412 458 504 550

25 1 127 170 212 255 297 340 382 425 467 510

26 1 118 158 197 237 276 316 355 395 434 474

27 1 111 147 184 221 258 295 332 368 405 442

28 1 103 138 172 207 241 275 310 344 379 413

29 1 97 129 161 194 226 258 290 323 355 387

30 1 91 121 152 182 212 242 273 303 333 364

31 1 86 114 143 171 200 228 257 285 314 342

32 1 81 108 134 161 188 215 242 269 296 323

33 1 76 102 127 152 178 203 229 254 280 305

34 1 72 96 120 144 168 192 216 240 265 289

35 1 68 91 114 137 160 182 205 228 251 273

36 1 65 87 108 130 151 173 195 216 238 260

37 1 62 82 103 123 144 165 185 206 226 247

38 1 59 78 98 117 137 157 176 196 215 235

39 1 56 75 93 112 131 149 168 187 205 224

40 1 53 71 89 107 125 142 160 178 196 214

*Flow rate from Sections 10.1 and 10.2.

Table 10.4.9.2(g) Allowable Pipe Length for ¾ in. PEX Tubing

Sprinkler FlowRate*

(gpm)

Water DistributionSize

(in.)

Available Pressure, P t (psi)

15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60

Allowable Length of Pipe from Service Valve to FarthestSprinkler (ft)

8 3⁄4 93 123 154 185 216 247 278 309 339 370

9 3⁄4 74 99 124 149 174 199 223 248 273 298

10 3⁄4 61 82 102 123 143 163 184 204 225 245

11 3⁄4 51 68 86 103 120 137 154 171 188 205

12 3⁄4 44 58 73 87 102 117 131 146 160 175

13 3⁄4 38 50 63 75 88 101 113 126 138 151

14 3⁄4 33 44 55 66 77 88 99 110 121 132

15 3⁄4 29 39 48 58 68 77 87 96 106 116

16 3⁄4 26 34 43 51 60 68 77 86 94 103

17 3⁄4 23 31 38 46 54 61 69 77 84 92

18 3⁄4 21 28 34 41 48 55 62 69 76 83

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

80 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 92 of 298

Page 98: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Sprinkler FlowRate*

(gpm)

Water DistributionSize

(in.)

Available Pressure, P t (psi)

15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60

Allowable Length of Pipe from Service Valve to FarthestSprinkler (ft)

19 3⁄4 19 25 31 37 44 50 56 62 69 75

20 3⁄4 17 23 28 34 40 45 51 57 62 68

21 3⁄4 16 21 26 31 36 41 47 52 57 62

22 3⁄4 NP 19 24 28 33 38 43 47 52 57

23 3⁄4 NP 17 22 26 31 35 39 44 48 52

24 3⁄4 NP 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 49

25 3⁄4 NP NP 19 22 26 30 34 37 41 45

26 3⁄4 NP NP 17 21 24 28 31 35 38 42

27 3⁄4 NP NP 16 20 23 26 29 33 36 39

28 3⁄4 NP NP 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36

29 3⁄4 NP NP NP 17 20 23 26 28 31 34

30 3⁄4 NP NP NP 16 19 21 24 27 29 32

31 3⁄4 NP NP NP 15 18 20 23 25 28 30

32 3⁄4 NP NP NP NP 17 19 21 24 26 28

33 3⁄4 NP NP NP NP 16 18 20 22 25 27

34 3⁄4 NP NP NP NP NP 17 19 21 23 25

35 3⁄4 NP NP NP NP NP 16 18 20 22 24

36 3⁄4 NP NP NP NP NP 15 17 19 21 23

37 3⁄4 NP NP NP NP NP NP 16 18 20 22

38 3⁄4 NP NP NP NP NP NP 16 17 19 21

39 3⁄4 NP NP NP NP NP NP NP 16 18 20

40 3⁄4 NP NP NP NP NP NP NP 16 17 19

NP: Not permitted.

*Flow rate from Sections 10.1 and 10.2.

Table 10.4.9.2(h) Allowable Pipe Length for 1 in. PEX Tubing

Sprinkler FlowRate*

(gpm)

Water DistributionSize

(in.)

Available Pressure, P t (psi)

15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60

Allowable Length of Pipe from Service Valve to FarthestSprinkler (ft)

8 1 314 418 523 628 732 837 941 1046 1151 1255

9 1 252 336 421 505 589 673 757 841 925 1009

10 1 208 277 346 415 485 554 623 692 761 831

11 1 174 232 290 348 406 464 522 580 638 696

12 1 148 198 247 296 346 395 445 494 543 593

13 1 128 170 213 256 298 341 383 426 469 511

14 1 111 149 186 223 260 297 334 371 409 446

15 1 98 131 163 196 229 262 294 327 360 392

16 1 87 116 145 174 203 232 261 290 319 348

17 1 78 104 130 156 182 208 233 259 285 311

18 1 70 93 117 140 163 187 210 233 257 280

19 1 63 84 106 127 148 169 190 211 232 253

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

81 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 93 of 298

Page 99: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Sprinkler FlowRate*

(gpm)

Water DistributionSize

(in.)

Available Pressure, P t (psi)

15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60

Allowable Length of Pipe from Service Valve to FarthestSprinkler (ft)

20 1 58 77 96 115 134 154 173 192 211 230

21 1 53 70 88 105 123 140 158 175 193 211

22 1 48 64 80 97 113 129 145 161 177 193

23 1 44 59 74 89 104 119 133 148 163 178

24 1 41 55 69 82 96 110 123 137 151 164

25 1 38 51 64 76 89 102 114 127 140 152

26 1 35 47 59 71 83 95 106 118 130 142

27 1 33 44 55 66 77 88 99 110 121 132

28 1 31 41 52 62 72 82 93 103 113 124

29 1 29 39 48 58 68 77 87 97 106 116

30 1 27 36 45 54 63 73 82 91 100 109

31 1 26 34 43 51 60 68 77 85 94 102

32 1 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 89 97

33 1 23 30 38 46 53 61 68 76 84 91

34 1 22 29 36 43 50 58 65 72 79 86

35 1 20 27 34 41 48 55 61 68 75 82

36 1 19 26 32 39 45 52 58 65 71 78

37 1 18 25 31 37 43 49 55 62 68 74

38 1 18 23 29 35 41 47 53 59 64 70

39 1 17 22 28 33 39 45 50 56 61 67

40 1 16 21 27 32 37 43 48 53 59 64

*Flow rate from Sections 10.1 and 10.2.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

The three sets of tables for ¾" pipe are all missing the "¾" in the table heading.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Melisa Rodriguez

Organization: Uponor

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 23 09:31:30 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

82 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 94 of 298

Page 100: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 81-NFPA 13D-2016 [ New Section after 12.3.5.1.4.2 ]

12.3.6 Inactive Systems

12.3.6.1* In a detached dwelling or a manufactured home the sprinkler system shall be permitted to be putin an inactive state for any of the following reasons:

(1) After a manufactured home has been installed and testing in the factory and is beingprepared for shipment.

(2) When a manufactured home is being stored for future occupancy.

(3) When the detached dwelling is unoccupied during renovation work, with notification andapproval of the AHJ.

(4) When the detached dwelling is unoccupied for an extended period of time, withnotification and approval of the AHJ.

12.3.6.2 Where a wet pipe system is installed and the piping will be subject to temperatures below 40° F(4°C) the piping and the stored water supply shall be drained.

12.3.6.2.1 * Residential pendent and sidewall sprinklers installed on drops, where the drops are 4” or lessin length, the drops shall not be required to be drained.

12.3.6.3 Prior to the system being restored to service, the system shall be filled with water, pressurized tonormal system pressure, and visually inspected for leaks.

12.3.6.4 Once the system has been restored to service, it shall be inspected and tested in accordance withsection 12.2 of this standard.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

There needs to be guidance for taking a system out of service. There are many instances when an installed system needs to be taken out of service such as for shipping or storage of a manufactured home, or when extensive renovation or remodeling work is going on in the home, or when the home will be unoccupied for an extended period of time. NFPA 13D sprinkler systems are life safety systems and do not need to remain active when the home is being shipped, stored or is unoccupied. This guidance is especially needed when the detached dwelling or manufactured home is subject to freezing temperatures. Once the home is to be occupied again, the system must be tested for leaks and the system and components inspected and testing before restored to service.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 82-NFPA 13D-2016 [New Section after A.12.3.5.1.3]

Public Input No. 83-NFPA 13D-2016 [New Section after A.12.3.5.1.3]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Terry Victor

Organization: Tyco Simplex Grinnell

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 11:31:54 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

83 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 95 of 298

Page 101: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 7-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. A.1.1 ]

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

84 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 96 of 298

Page 102: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

A.1.1

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

85 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 97 of 298

Page 103: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

NFPA 13D is appropriate for protection against fire hazards only in one- and two-family dwellings andmanufactured homes. Residential portions of any other type of building or occupancy should be protectedwith residential sprinklers in accordance with NFPA 13 or in accordance with NFPA 13R. Other portions ofsuch buildings should be protected in accordance with NFPA 13 or NFPA 13R as appropriate for areasoutside the dwelling unit.

The criteria in this standard are based on full-scale fire tests of rooms containing typical furnishings found inresidential living rooms, kitchens, and bedrooms. The furnishings were arranged as typically found indwelling units in a manner similar to that shown in Figure A.1.1(a) , Figure A.1.1(b) , and Figure A.1.1(c).Sixty full-scale fire tests were conducted in a two-story dwelling in Los Angeles, California, and 16 testswere conducted in a 14 ft (4.2 m) wide mobile home in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Sprinkler systems designed and installed according to this standard are expected to prevent flashoverwithin the compartment of origin where sprinklers are installed in the compartment. A sprinkler systemdesigned and installed according to this standard cannot, however, be expected to completely control a fire

involving fuel loads that are significantly higher than average for dwelling units [10 lb/ft2 (49 kg/m2)] andwhere the interior finish has an unusually exhibits either a high flame spread index (greater than 225 200,corresponding to a Class C ) when tested in accordance with ASTM E84, Standard Test Method for SurfaceBurning Characteristics of Building Materials, or ANSI/UL 723, Standard for Test for Surface BurningCharacteristics of Building Materials or a high heat release (such as a heat release rate exceeding 800 kW)when tested in accordance with NFPA 286 .

(For protection of multifamily dwellings, see NFPA 13 or NFPA 13R.)

Figure A.1.1(a) Bedroom.

Figure A.1.1(b) Manufactured Home Bedroom.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

86 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 98 of 298

Page 104: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Figure A.1.1(c) Living Room.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Any material with a flame spread index above 200 (for a Class C) in accordance with ASTM E84 is basically considered unclassified. In more modern terms the key concern is heat release and the best test for that for interior finish is NFPA 286. An interior finish material must exhibit a peak heat release rate not exceeding 800 kW and not reach flashover in the tests to be considered acceptable.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 8-NFPA 13D-2016 [Section No. B.1.1]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Marcelo Hirschler

Organization: GBH International

Street Address:

City:

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

87 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 99 of 298

Page 105: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jan 06 17:52:28 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

88 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 100 of 298

Page 106: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 3-NFPA 13D-2015 [ New Section after A.1.2 ]

A.1.4

It is the intent of the committee to recognize that future editions of this standard are a further refinement ofthis edition and earlier editions. The changes in future editions will reflect the continuing input of the fireprotection community in its attempt to meet the purpose stated in this standard. Compliance with allrequirements of a future edition could be considered as providing an equivalent level of system integrity andperformance of the system.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Many AHJ's will not recognize future editions. This annex note is intended to give guidance that use of an entire future edition of the standard could be considered an equivalency as allowed in 1.4. This language will be proposed to other sprinkler standards and has been accepted by NFPA 14 & NFPA 25.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Dec 22 10:27:44 EST 2015

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

89 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 101 of 298

Page 107: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 42-NFPA 13D-2016 [ New Section after A.3.2.4 ]

A.3.3.1 Bathroom

A room is still considered a bathroom if it contains just a toilet, Additionally, two bathrooms can be adjacentto each other and are considered separate rooms, provided they are enclosed with the required level ofconstruction.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Even though it can be found in 13R, at times there have been conflicting opinions about what constitutes a bathroom, especially when the bathroom is divided up into two separate rooms and the combined total size exceeds 55 square feet but the individual room size is less than 55 square feet. This language is extracted from the equivalent sections of NFPA 13R.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 41-NFPA 13D-2016 [New Section after 3.3.1] Annex material

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Melisa Rodriguez

Organization: Uponor

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 21 17:24:51 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

90 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 102 of 298

Page 108: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 86-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. A.4.5 ]

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

91 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 103 of 298

Page 109: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

A.4.5

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

92 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 104 of 298

Page 110: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

A scaled drawing where required should show the following:

(1) Address Point of compass

(2) Name of owner (if known)

Size and

(3) Location, including street address

(4) Site plan / vicinity map

(5) For systems supplied by city mains, location and size of city main in street, and location, size, andtype of domestic line, including length to city connection, and water meter location and size. Staticand residual hydrants that were used in flow tests shall be shown. The location of the 5 gpm domesticdemand shall be indicated

(6) Water meter size and utility plans and/or plumbing plans necessary to show connection from watersupply to fire sprinkler system

(7) Current static water pressure or static water pressure provided by the utility

(8) Interior walls

(9) Full height cross section

(10) Ceiling/roof heights and slopes not shown in the full height cross section

(11) Location of partitions, lintels, and doorways. Lintel openings require a cross section view to indicatethe area of the opening

(12) Name and label for each area or room

(13) Indicate by note the minimum rate of water application per sprinkler head, the maximum spacing foreach head, and the domestic demand

(14) Model, manufacturer, temperature, orifice size, and spacing requirements of sprinklers

(15) Make, type, model, temperature rating, nominal K-factor, and number of each type of sprinkler,including sprinkler identification number

(16) Pipe type and schedule of wall thickness

(17) Nominal pipe size and cutting lengths of pipe (or center-to-center dimensions). Where typical branchlines prevail, it shall be necessary to size only one typical line

(18) Location and size of riser nipples and drops

(19) Type of fittings and joints

(20) Type and locations of hangers, and methods of securing sprinklers when applicable

(21) Location and size of all valves and drain pipes

(22) Location and size of water gauges

(23) Type of pipe

(24) Hanger spacing requirement per the pipe manufacturer

(25) Riser detail

(26) Information about antifreeze solution used. Indicate the type of antifreeze used, the amount ofantifreeze in the system, and information about antifreeze compatibility with the pipe.

(27) Installing contractor information

(28) Preliminary hydraulic calculations

(29) (name, address, phone number, email address)

(30) A summary of the hydraulics, including the static pressure, residual pressure, and flow of the watersupply, the pressure and flow demands at the point of connection to the water supply, and thepressure and flow demands at the bottom of the system riser.

(31) Hydraulic reference points shown on the plan that correspond with comparable reference points onthe hydraulic calculation sheets.

(32) Relative elevations of sprinklers, junction points, and supply or reference points.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

93 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 105 of 298

Page 111: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

(33) A graphic representation of the scale used on all plans

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

These items will aid plan review and inspections.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Lynn Nielson

Organization: City Of Henderson

Affilliation: Self

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 14:10:25 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

94 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 106 of 298

Page 112: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 65-NFPA 13D-2016 [ New Section after A.5.3 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

A. 5.3 (2) There may be instances when the system riser is located at the water supply source orsome other location outside of the dwelling or home. Underground pipe and fittings or tubeacceptable under the applicable plumbing code is adequate to run from the remote system riser tothe dwelling or home.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

In the scenario where the water supply source and the riser assembly is not in the dwelling unit, underground pipe and fittings may be needed to run from the riser assembly to the dwelling. FEMA uses this arrangement when providing sprinkler systems for many of their manufactured housing units. This arrangement could also be used when retrofitting an existing dwelling or home. The added text makes it clear that underground pipe and fittings do not have to be listed. However, in accordance with section 5.3 the underground pipe and fittings must comply with the applicable plumbing code for the dwelling or home.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 64-NFPA 13D-2016 [Section No. 5.3]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Terry Victor

Organization: Tyco Simplex Grinnell

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 28 13:44:13 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

95 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 107 of 298

Page 113: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 67-NFPA 13D-2016 [ New Section after A.6.2 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

A. 6.2.3 Well pumps are an economical way to provide a water supply source in rural areas withouta municipal water supply. Rather than having a pump and tank assembly as described in sections6.2.1 and 6.2.2 which typically takes up floor space in the dwelling or home and requires a separateac power source among other things, the well pump can be up-sized to accommodate the sprinklerdemand at considerably less cost.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

While well pumps are an economical solution for a water supply in rural areas, many home builders aren’t aware of this option. The additional annex text should help bring this option to the forefront and decrease the cost of the residential sprinkler system.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 66-NFPA 13D-2016 [New Section after 6.2.3.2]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Terry Victor

Organization: Tyco Simplex Grinnell

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 28 13:49:47 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

96 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 108 of 298

Page 114: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 10-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. A.6.2 ]

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

97 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 109 of 298

Page 115: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

A.6.2

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

98 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 110 of 298

Page 116: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

The connection to city mains for fire protection is often subject to local regulation of metering and backflowprevention requirements. Preferred and acceptable water supply arrangements are shown in FigureA.6.2(a)through Figure A.6.2(d) . Where it is necessary to use a meter between the city water main andthe sprinkler system supply, an acceptable arrangement as shown in Figure A.6.2(c)and FigureA.6.2(d)can be used. Under these circumstances, the flow characteristics of the meter are to be includedin the hydraulic calculation of the system [see Table 10.4.4(a)]. Where a tank is used for both domesticand fire protection purposes, a low water alarm that actuates when the water level falls below 110 percentof the minimum quantity specified in 6.1.2 should be provided.

The effect of pressure-reducing valves on the system should be considered in the hydraulic calculationprocedures.

Figure A.6.2(a) , Figure A.6.2(c), or Figure A.6.2(d)are acceptable methods for getting the water supplyinto the unit for a stand-alone sprinkler system (one that does not also provide direct connections to thecold water fixtures) because the common supply pipe for the domestic system and the sprinkler systembetween the water supply and the dwelling unit has a single control valve that shuts the sprinkler system,which helps to ensure that people who have running water to their domestic fixtures also have fireprotection. This serves as a form of supervision for the control valve and can be used to make sure thatthe valve stays open in place of other, more expensive options such as tamper switches with a monitoringservice.

Some water utilities insist on separate taps and supply pipes from the water supply to the dwelling unit forfire sprinkler systems as shown in Figure A.6.2(d) , due to concerns about shutting off the water supply fornonpayment of bills and the desire not to shut off fire protection if this ever occurs. While these types ofarrangements are acceptable, they might not be cost efficient and should be discouraged due to the extracost burden this places on the building owner. The concern over shutting off the water for nonpayment ofbills is a nonissue for a number of reasons. First, the water utilities rarely actually shut off water fornonpayment. Second, if they do shut off water for nonpayment, they are creating violations of all sorts ofhealth and safety codes, allowing people to live in a home without running water. Concern over the fireprotection for those individuals when they are violating all kinds of other health codes is disingenuous.More likely, the water utility will not shut off the water and will follow other legal avenues to collect onunpaid bills, such as liens on property. Millions of people should not have to pay hundreds of millions ofdollars to install separate water taps and lines for the few services that might get shut off.

Figure A.6.2(a) Minimum Requirements for a Stand-Alone System.

Figure A.6.2(b) Acceptable Arrangement for Stand-Alone Piping Systems — Option 1.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

99 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 111 of 298

Page 117: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Figure A.6.2(c) Acceptable Arrangement for Stand-Alone Piping System — Option 2.

Figure A.6.2(d) Acceptable Arrangement for Stand-alone Piping Systems — Option 3.

Additional Proposed Changes

File Name Description Approved

NFPA_13D_Fig_A.6.2_e_-Model.pdf NFPA 13D Fig A.6.2(e)

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Add figure E for townhouses. This is a common scenario for supplying standalone NFPA 13D systems. Many

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

100 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 112 of 298

Page 118: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

FIGURE A.6.2(e) Acceptable Arrangement for Townhouse Stand-alone Piping Systems

Page 113 of 298

Page 119: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

water purveyors will not allow combined feeds into the dwelling unit. In fact many water purveyors mandate a 2" minimum connection for a sprinkler system. This scenario incorporates a single backflow preventer and uses underground to feed each dwelling unit.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Feb 23 11:17:19 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

101 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 114 of 298

Page 120: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 73-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. A.6.2 ]

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

102 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 115 of 298

Page 121: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

A.6.2

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

103 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 116 of 298

Page 122: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

The connection to city mains for fire protection is often subject to local regulation of metering and backflowprevention requirements. Preferred and acceptable water supply arrangements are shown in FigureA.6.2(a)through Figure A.6.2(d) . Where it is necessary to use a meter between the city water main and thesprinkler system supply, an acceptable arrangement as shown in Figure A.6.2(c)and Figure A.6.2(d)can beused. Under these circumstances, the flow characteristics of the meter are to be included in the hydrauliccalculation of the system [see Table 10.4.4(a) ]. Where a tank is used for both domestic and fire protectionpurposes, a low water alarm that actuates when the water level falls below 110 percent of the minimumquantity specified in 6.1.2 should be provided.

The effect of pressure-reducing valves on the system should be considered in the hydraulic calculationprocedures.

Figure A.6.2(a), Figure A.6.2(c), or Figure A.6.2(d)are acceptable methods for getting the water supplyinto the unit for a stand-alone sprinkler system (one that does not also provide direct connections to thecold water fixtures) because the common supply pipe for the domestic system and the sprinkler systembetween the water supply and the dwelling unit has a single control valve that shuts the sprinkler system,which helps to ensure that people who have running water to their domestic fixtures also have fireprotection. This serves as a form of supervision for the control valve and can be used to make sure that thevalve stays open in place of other, more expensive options such as tamper switches with a monitoringservice.

Some water utilities insist on separate taps and supply pipes from the water supply to the dwelling unit forfire sprinkler systems as shown in Figure A.6.2(d), due to concerns about shutting off the water supply fornonpayment of bills and the desire not to shut off fire protection if this ever occurs. While these types ofarrangements are acceptable, they might not be cost efficient and should be discouraged due to the extracost burden this places on the building owner. The concern over shutting off the water for nonpayment ofbills is a nonissue for a number of reasons. First, It is extremely rare that the water utilities rarely wouldactually shut off water for nonpayment. Second , and even if they do shut off water for nonpayment, theyare creating violations of all sorts of health and safety codes, allowing people to live in a home withoutrunning water. Concern over the fire protection for those individuals when they are violating all kinds ofother health codes is disingenuous. More likely, the water utility will not shut off the water and will followother legal avenues to collect on unpaid bills, such as liens on property. Millions of people should not haveto pay hundreds of millions of dollars to install separate water taps and lines for the few services that mightget shut off. a situation in which the dwelling would be unfit for occupation. As the purpose of an NFPA13D system is life safety, an unoccupied dwelling would not require an active sprinkler system.

Figure A.6.2(a) Minimum Requirements for a Stand-Alone System.

Figure A.6.2(b) Acceptable Arrangement for Stand-Alone Piping Systems — Option 1.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

104 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 117 of 298

Page 123: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Figure A.6.2(c) Acceptable Arrangement for Stand-Alone Piping System — Option 2.

Figure A.6.2(d) Acceptable Arrangement for Stand-alone Piping Systems — Option 3.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Edit for length and content, some of the language used is informal and doesn’t necessarily result in broader acceptance of residential fire sprinkler systems.

Submitter Information Verification

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

105 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 118 of 298

Page 124: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Submitter Full Name: Melisa Rodriguez

Organization: Uponor

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 28 17:07:47 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

106 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 119 of 298

Page 125: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 74-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. A.6.2.3 ]

A.6.2.3

The best method for getting the water supply into the unit for a stand-alone sprinkler system (one that doesnot also provide direct connections to the cold water fixtures) is to have a common pipe for the domesticsystem and the sprinkler system between the water supply and the dwelling unit. Once inside the dwellingunit, the pipes can be split to provide the individual domestic and sprinkler systems. In this arrangement, asingle control valve on the combined pipe (prior to the split) as shown in Figure A.6.2(a) being the onlycontrol valve that shuts the sprinkler system is preferred because it ensures that people who have runningwater to their domestic fixtures also have fire protection. This serves as a form of supervision for thecontrol valve and can be used to make sure that the valve stays open in place of other, more expensiveoptions such as tamper switches with monitoring service. Some water utilities insist on separate taps andsupply pipes from the water supply to the dwelling unit for fire sprinkler systems due to concerns aboutshutting off the water supply for nonpayment of bills and the desire not to shut off fire protection if this everoccurs. While this type of arrangement is acceptable [see Figure A.6.2(b) ] , it is not cost efficient andshould be discouraged due to the extra burden this places on the building owner. The concern overshutting off the water for nonpayment of bills is a nonissue for a number of reasons. First, the water utilitiesrarely actually shut off water for nonpayment. Second, if they do shut off water for nonpayment, they arecreating violations of all sorts of health and safety codes, allowing people to live in a home without runningwater. Concern over the fire protection for those individuals when they are violating all kinds of other healthcodes is disingenuous. More likely, the water utility will not shut off the water and will follow other legalavenues to collect on unpaid bills such as liens on property. Millions of people should not have to payhundreds of millions of dollars to install separate water taps and lines for the few services that might getshut off. In a situation where a two-family dwelling or townhouse has a common water supply, there mustbe a way to isolate the sprinkler system in one unit without having to enter another unit. When each unithas its own, accessible shutoff valve and one unit suffers a fire event and cannot be occupied, thedamaged unit can be isolated and other units can remain occupied because they have functioning sprinklersystems.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Currently this section is an almost word-for word copy of the previous section. It doesn’t seem as though the language needs to be repeated. The language on page 64 of the 13D/13R handbook in the handbook (Ask the AHJ) would be more appropriate to clarify this section.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Melisa Rodriguez

Organization: Uponor

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 28 17:11:07 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

107 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 120 of 298

Page 126: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 75-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. A.6.3 ]

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

108 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 121 of 298

Page 127: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

A.6.3

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

109 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 122 of 298

Page 128: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Multipurpose piping systems consist of a single piping system within a residential occupancy that isintended to serve both domestic and fire protection needs. Basic forms of this system are shown in FigureA.6.3(a), Figure A.6.3(b), Figure A.6.3(c), and Figure A.6.3(d). A network system, as defined in 3.3.11.4,is a type of multipurpose system that utilizes a common piping system supplying domestic fixtures and firesprinklers where each sprinkler is supplied by a minimum of three separate paths. In dwellings wherelong-term use of lawn sprinklers is common, provision should be made for such usage. The supply for thelawn sprinkler system should originate at the main system riser instead of being supplied from thecombined fire sprinkler/domestic water pipe throughout the home.

Figure A.6.3(a) Multipurpose Piping System (Tree System) — Example 1.

Figure A.6.3(b) Multipurpose Piping System (Looped System) — Example 2.

Figure A.6.3(c) Multipurpose Piping System — Example 3 (Network System).

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

110 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 123 of 298

Page 129: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Figure A.6.3(d) Common Water Supply Connection Serving More Than One Dwelling Unit.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

It doesn’t currently give any suggestions for what the “provision” should be when long term use of lawn sprinklers will be common. An additional flow added to the hydraulic calculations would not be a practical solution as it will not often be apparent what the potential future level of usage will be.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Melisa Rodriguez

Organization: Uponor

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 28 17:23:44 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

111 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 124 of 298

Page 130: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 48-NFPA 13D-2016 [ New Section after A.7.2.4 ]

A.7.2.1

In the case of a passive-purge or multipurpose system, a plumbing fixture on the system side of the maincontrol valve will meet the requirement for a drain.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Some may read this to mean that a drain valve at the system riser is required when a plumbing fixture meets the drain requirements called for in this section. The sprinkler system can be adequately drained from a plumbing fixture that is fed from the sprinkler system piping.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Melisa Rodriguez

Organization: Uponor

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 23 09:33:50 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

112 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 125 of 298

Page 131: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 80-NFPA 13D-2016 [ New Section after A.7.5.6.3 ]

A.Table 7.5.6.3

Guidance for spacing around fireplaces

Additional Proposed Changes

File Name Description Approved

Fireplace2.pdf Guidance for spacing around fireplaces

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

The language provided in the table provides ambiguous information about spacing sprinklers with regard to fireplaces. These diagrams provide additional clarification. Alternatively, the Annex comment could be attached to 7.5.6.3(3).

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 79-NFPA 13D-2016 [Section No. 7.5.6.3]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Robert Upson

Organization: National Fire Sprinkler Association

Affilliation: NFSA Engineering and Standards Committee

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 10:41:53 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

113 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 126 of 298

Page 132: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

36” 36”

60”

Recessed Fireplace: 60” from open face, 36” from sides of opening

Page 127 of 298

Page 133: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

36” 36”

Open Fireplace: 36” from faces with radiused corners

Page 128 of 298

Page 134: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 76-NFPA 13D-2016 [ New Section after A.8.3.4 ]

New Annex Section

A.8.3.5.1.2. Where a chimney or flue from a fuel-fired equipment passes through a concealed space, it isnot required to locate a sprinkler in this concealed space.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Some AHJ’s are using this section to require sprinklers in attic adjacent to the chimney for the fuel fired equipment below. This section is intended to apply to the actual fuel-fired equipment and not to the chimney where it passes through the attic. This Annex section will clarify.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 57-NFPA 13D-2016 [Section No. 8.3.5.1.2]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Roland Asp

Organization: National Fire Sprinkler Association

Affilliation: NFSA E&S Committee

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 28 21:23:48 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

114 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 129 of 298

Page 135: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 59-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. A.10.2 ]

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

115 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 130 of 298

Page 136: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

A.10.2

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

116 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 131 of 298

Page 137: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

All residential sprinklers have been investigated under a flat, smooth, 8 ft (2.4 m) high horizontal ceiling.Some residential sprinklers have been investigated and listed for use under specific ceiling configurationssuch as a horizontal beamed ceiling. The performance of residential sprinklers under flat, smooth,horizontal ceilings has been well documented throughout the life of NFPA 13D. Prior to 2010, severalmanufacturers of residential sprinklers had performed testing and received listings for residential sprinklersunder certain slopes and in certain beam conditions. In 2010, the Fire Protection Research Foundation(FPRF) conducted a research project consisting of 76 FDS simulations and 12 full-scale fire tests. Theresults have been used to develop system design criteria in a generic manner to simplify the use ofresidential sprinklers. Some residential sprinkler listings still exist for situations beyond the scope of thegeneric design. See the FPRF report, “Analysis of the Performance of Residential Sprinkler Systems withSloped or Sloped and Beamed Ceilings” dated July 2010 for more information.

Questions are frequently asked regarding the minimum two sprinkler design when certain sprinklerperformance statistics have indicated that in a majority of the cases (with residential sprinklers) the fire iscontrolled or suppressed with a single sprinkler. While these statistics might or might not be accurate, thewater supplies for the fire sprinkler systems under which these statistics were generated were designed fortwo or more sprinklers in the first place. When the fires occurred, the first sprinkler operated in excess of itsindividual design flow and pressure because the sprinkler system’s water supply was strong enough tohandle multiple sprinklers and only a single sprinkler opened. At these higher flows and pressures, thedischarge from a single sprinkler was sufficient to limit or suppress the heat generated from the fire. Thisconcept is called “hydraulic increase.” Hydraulic increase can also occur when a water supply’s capabilitiesduring the fire event exceeded that required by the minimum design requirements of the standard. Sincenone of the data used to generate the previously mentioned statistics captured the capabilities of the watersupply in relation to the design requirements, the impact of the hydraulic increase on the number of singlesprinkler activations cannot be determined.

But if the minimum water supply requirement of the standard is reduced to only be capable of handling asingle sprinkler, then there could be no hydraulic increase safety factor. When the first sprinkler opens, itwill only get the flow and pressure that were originally designed for it, and the potential is significant for thatto be insufficient to control the fire, given any obstructions and the layout of the space where the fire starts.

The National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST), under a grant from the United States FireAdministration, studied this concept several years ago in the hopes of being able to propose a single-sprinkler flow for the 2007 edition of NFPA 13D (see NIST Report NIST GCR 05-875 prepared byUnderwriters Laboratories with a publication date of February 2004). Unfortunately, the research did notsupport the design of a sprinkler system with only the flow for a single sprinkler, even under conditions ofsmall rooms with flat, smooth ceilings. Without the hydraulic increase associated with the two-sprinklerdesign, the fire scenarios were too many where the first sprinkler to open would have insufficient flow tocontrol the fire and then multiple sprinklers would open, causing the room to reach untenable conditionsand the water supply to be overrun. These same fire scenarios were easily controlled by a sprinkler systemdesigned for a two-sprinkler water supply from the start.

In addition to the NIST tests, the National Fire Sprinkler Association conducted a series of full-scale firetests in simulated bedrooms that were 14 ft × 14 ft (4.2 m × 4.2 m) with an adjoining hallway, each with flat,smooth, 8 ft (2.4 m) high ceilings. The tests were performed to determine better rules for keeping sprinklersclear of obstructions like ceiling fans, but baseline tests were also performed without any obstructions at theceiling. In nine out of the twelve tests, including the two baseline tests without obstructions at the ceiling, asprinkler in the hall outside the room of fire origin opened first, followed by the sprinkler in the room oforigin. Even though the room of origin met all of the rules of NFPA 13D as a compartment, a sprinkleroutside of this room was opening first. All of these fires were controlled by the sprinklers, but if the watersupply had only been sufficient for a single sprinkler, the sprinklers might not have been able to provide firecontrol.

For examples of selecting a compartment for consideration, see Figure A.10.2(a) and Figure A.10.2(b),which show examples of design configurations for compartments based on the presence of lintels to stopthe flow of heat.

Figure A.10.2(a) Sprinkler Design Areas for Typical Residential Occupancy — Without Lintel.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

117 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 132 of 298

Page 138: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Figure A.10.2(b) Sprinkler Design Areas for Typical Residential Occupancy — With Lintel.

d

Additional Proposed Changes

File Name Description Approved

scan0855.pdf Figure A.10.2(b) with suggested correction

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

NFPA 13D, 2016 Figure A.10.2(b) currently depicts only an 8" lintel between the Dining and Living Room which meets the compartment definition in the 2007 NFPA 13D standard. Beginning in 2010 NFPA 13D standard, a compartment is limited to 8' wide openings per wall. See NFPA 13D section 3.3.1 for the definition of a compartment. The figure needs to be changed as suggested to depict the maximum permitted 8' wide opening.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Daniel Mathias

Organization: Absolute Fire Protection, Inc

Affilliation: AFSA

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 28 09:39:04 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

118 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 133 of 298

Page 139: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Page 134 of 298

Page 140: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 82-NFPA 13D-2016 [ New Section after A.12.3.5.1.3 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

A.12.3.6.1 This section only addresses sprinkler systems in detached dwellings or manufactured homesbecause there are no other occupants in adjacent dwelling units affected by the inactive system.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

There needs to be guidance for taking a system out of service. There are many instances when an installed system needs to be taken out of service such as for shipping or storage of a manufactured home, or when extensive renovation or remodeling work is going on in the home, or when the home will be unoccupied for an extended period of time. NFPA 13D sprinkler systems are life safety systems and do not need to remain active when the home is being shipped, stored or is unoccupied. This guidance is especially needed when the detached dwelling or manufactured home is subject to freezing temperatures. Once the home is to be occupied again, the system must be tested for leaks and the system and components inspected and testing before restored to service.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 81-NFPA 13D-2016 [New Section after 12.3.5.1.4.2]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Terry Victor

Organization: Tyco Simplex Grinnell

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 11:36:31 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

119 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 135 of 298

Page 141: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 83-NFPA 13D-2016 [ New Section after A.12.3.5.1.3 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

A. 12.3.6.2.1 For drops less than 4” long, the branch line piping and the drops can both be installed in areasbelow 40°F (4°C). Tests have been conducted that prove that as long as the branch line is empty of waterand water is in a drop, when ice forms it will expand into the branch piping without harming the sprinkler orthe system piping.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

There needs to be guidance for taking a system out of service. There are many instances when an installed system needs to be taken out of service such as for shipping or storage of a manufactured home, or when extensive renovation or remodeling work is going on in the home, or when the home will be unoccupied for an extended period of time. NFPA 13D sprinkler systems are life safety systems and do not need to remain active when the home is being shipped, stored or is unoccupied. This guidance is especially needed when the detached dwelling or manufactured home is subject to freezing temperatures. Once the home is to be occupied again, the system must be tested for leaks and the system and components inspected and testing before restored to service.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 81-NFPA 13D-2016 [New Section after 12.3.5.1.4.2]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Terry Victor

Organization: Tyco Simplex Grinnell

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 11:39:38 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

120 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 136 of 298

Page 142: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 2-NFPA 13D-2015 [ Chapter B ]

Annex B Informational References

B.1 Referenced Publications.

The documents or portions thereof listed in this annex are referenced within the informational sections ofthis standard and are not part of the requirements of this document unless also listed in Chapter 2 for otherreasons.

B.1.1 NFPA Publications.

National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471.

NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, 2016 edition.

NFPA 13R, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in Low-Rise Residential Occupancies, 2016edition.

NFPA 24, Standard for the Installation of Private Fire Service Mains and Their Appurtenances, 2016edition.

NFPA 72 ®, National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code, 2016 edition.

B.1.2 Other Publications.

B.1.2.1 ASTM Publications.

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM A 135 A135 /A135M , Standard Specification for Electric-Resistance-Welded Steel Pipe, 20062009, reapproved 2014 .

ASTM E 84 E84 , Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, 20092015b .

ASTM F 437 F437 , Standard Specification for Threaded Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) PlasticPipe Fittings, Schedule 80, 1996 2015 .

ASTM F 438 F438 , Standard Specification for Socket-Type Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC)Plastic Pipe Fittings, Schedule 40, 1997 2015 .

ASTM F 439 F439 , Standard Specification for Socket-Type Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC)Plastic Pipe Fittings, Schedule 80, 1997 2013 .

ASTM F 442 F442 /F442M , Standard Specification for Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) PlasticPipe (SDR-PR), 1997 2015a .

ASTM F 876 F876 , Standard Specification for Crosslinked Polyethylene (PEX) Tubing, 2008 2015a .

IEEE/ ASTM SI 10, Standard for Use of the International System of Units (SI): The Modern Metric System,1997 2010 .

B.1.2.2 FPRF Publications.

Fire Protection Research Foundation, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169.

“Analysis of the Performance of Residential Sprinkler Systems with Sloped or Sloped and BeamedCeilings,” July 2010.

Antifreeze Solutions Supplied through Spray Sprinklers – Interim Report, February, 2012.

Antifreeze Systems in Home Fire Sprinkler Systems — Literature Review and Research Plan, June 2010.

Antifreeze Systems in Home Fire Sprinkler Systems — Phase II Final Report, December 2010.

“Sprinkler Insulation: A Literature Review,” July 2011.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

121 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 137 of 298

Page 143: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

B.1.2.3 NFIRS Publications.

National Fire Incident Reporting System, U.S. Fire Administration, 16825 S. Seton Avenue, Emmitsburg,MD 21727.

NFIRS 5.0, Program Manager Toolkit (CD-ROM).

B.1.2.4 NFSA Publications.

National Fire Sprinkler Association, P.O. Box 1000 40 Jon Barrett Road , Patterson, NY 12563.

Valentine and Isman, Kitchen Cabinets and Residential Sprinklers, November 2005.

Valentine and Isman, Interaction of Residential Sprinklers, Ceiling Fans and Similar Obstructions,November 2005.

B.1.2.5 NIST Publications.

National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-1070.

NIST GCR 05-875, Research Investigation for Determination of Residential Sprinkler Performance,February 2004.

B.1.2.6 UL Publications.

Underwriters Laboratories Inc., 333 Pfingsten Road, Northbrook, IL 60062-2096.

ANSI/ UL 723, Standard for Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, 2008, Revised2010 2013 .

ANSI/ UL 1626, Residential Sprinklers for Fire-Protection Service, 2008, revised 2012 .

B.2 Informational References. (Reserved)

B.3 References for Extracts in Informational Sections.

NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, 2016 edition.

NFPA 24, Standard for the Installation of Private Fire Service Mains and Their Appurtenances, 2016edition.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Referenced current SDO names, addresses, standard names, numbers, and editions.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 1-NFPA 13D-2015[Chapter 2]

Referenced current SDO names, addresses, standard names,numbers, and editions.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Aaron Adamczyk

Organization: [ Not Specified ]

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sun Dec 20 17:35:55 EST 2015

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

122 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 138 of 298

Page 144: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 8-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. B.1.1 ]

B.1.1 NFPA Publications.

National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471.

NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, 2016 edition.

NFPA 13R, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in Low-Rise Residential Occupancies, 2016edition.

NFPA 24, Standard for the Installation of Private Fire Service Mains and Their Appurtenances, 2016edition.

NFPA 72 ®, National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code, 2016 edition.

NFPA 286, 2015 edition.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

needed for correlation with input on annex section.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 7-NFPA 13D-2016 [Section No. A.1.1]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Marcelo Hirschler

Organization: GBH International

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jan 06 17:57:02 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

123 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 139 of 298

Page 145: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 5-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. B.1.2.1 ]

B.1.2.1 ASTM Publications.

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM A 135 A135/A135M , Standard Specification for Electric-Resistance-Welded Steel Pipe, 2006 2009(2014) .

ASTM E 84 E84 , Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials,2009 2015b .

ASTM F 437 F437 , Standard Specification for Threaded Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) PlasticPipe Fittings, Schedule 80, 1996 2015 .

ASTM F 438 F438 , Standard Specification for Socket-Type Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC)Plastic Pipe Fittings, Schedule 40, 1997 2015 .

ASTM F 439 F439 , Standard Specification for Socket-Type Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC)Plastic Pipe Fittings, Schedule 80, 1997 2013 .

ASTM F 442 F442/F442M , Standard Specification for Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) PlasticPipe (SDR-PR), 1997 2013 e1 .

ASTM F 876 F876 , Standard Specification for Crosslinked Polyethylene (PEX) Tubing, 2008 2015a .

IEEE/ASTM SI 10, Standard for Use of the International System of Units (SI): The Modern Metric System,1997.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

date updates

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Marcelo Hirschler

Organization: GBH International

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jan 06 17:41:24 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

124 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 140 of 298

Page 146: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 55-NFPA 13D-2016 [ Section No. B.1.2.6 ]

B.1.2.6 UL Publications.

Underwriters Laboratories Inc., 333 Pfingsten Road, Northbrook, IL 60062-2096.

ANSI/UL 723, Standard for Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, 2008, Revised2010 2013 .

ANSI/UL 1626, Residential Sprinklers for Fire-Protection Service, 2008, Revised 2012 .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

This proposed change reflects updates to referenced UL Standards that are referenced.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Ronald Farr

Organization: UL LLC

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Jun 27 15:30:36 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

125 of 125 6/30/2016 12:47 PM

Page 141 of 298

Page 147: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 37-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 1.1 [Excluding any Sub-Sections] ]

This standard shall cover the design and installation of automatic sprinkler systems for protection againstfire hazards in residential occupancies up to and including four stories in height, that are located inbuildings not exceeding 60 ft (18 m) in height above grade plane.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

At a recent ICC code hearing, there was extensive discussion about whether the 4-story limit in NFPA 13R relates to grade plane, as defined in the building code. It does not.

Although the existing NFPA 13R text was thought to be clear that the 4-story limit is not with respect to grade plane (which is why "in height" was repeated in the existing scope text), it has become apparent that the existing text needs to be slightly adjusted to better convey this point. This is particularly important with respect to application of NFPA 13R to buildings that are constructed in accordance with pedestal building options under model building codes. Proper application of the standard to pedestal construction, consistent with this proposal, is clearly conveyed in the NFPA Residential Sprinkler Systems Handbook, but adjusting the scoping text should help to eliminate any remaining confusion.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 38-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. A.1.1]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Jeffrey Shapiro

Organization: International Code Consultants

Affilliation: National Multifamily Housing Council

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Apr 27 20:14:25 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

1 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 142 of 298

Page 148: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 1-NFPA 13R-2015 [ Chapter 2 ]

Chapter 2 Referenced Publications

2.1 General.

The documents or portions thereof listed in this chapter are referenced within this standard and shall beconsidered part of the requirements of this document.

2.2 NFPA Publications.

National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471.

NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, 2016 edition.

NFPA 20, Standard for the Installation of Stationary Pumps for Fire Protection, 2016 edition.

NFPA 22, Standard for Water Tanks for Private Fire Protection, 2013 edition.

NFPA 25, Standard for the Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems,2014 edition.

NFPA 101® , Life Safety Code®, 2015 edition.

NFPA 220, Standard on Types of Building Construction, 2015 edition.

NFPA 750, Standard on Water Mist Fire Protection Systems, 2014 edition.

NFPA 5000® , Building Construction and Safety Code®, 2015 edition.

2.3 Other Publications.

2.3.1 ANSI ASME Publications.

American National Standards Institute, Inc., 25 West 43rd Street, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10036.

ANSI B36.10M, Welded and Seamless Wrought Steel Pipe , 2004.

2.3.2 ASME Publications.

American Society of Mechanical Engineers ASME International , Two Park Avenue, New York, NY10016-5990.

ASME A17.1, Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators, 2004 2013 .

ASME B16.1, Gray Iron Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings, Classes 25, 125, and 250, 2010 2015 .

ASME B16.3, Malleable Iron Threaded Fittings, Classes 150 and 300, 2006 2011 .

ASME B16.4, Gray Iron Threaded Fittings, Classes 125 and 250, 2006 2011 .

ASME B16.5, Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings, NPS 1/2 through NPS 24 Metric/Inch Standard, 20092013 .

ASME B16.9, Factory-Made Wrought Buttwelding Fittings, 2007 2012 .

ASME B16.11, Forged Fittings, Socket-Welding and Threaded, 2009 2011 .ANSI

/ ASME B16.15, Cast Bronze Threaded Fittings , 2009 Cast Copper Alloy Threaded Fittings Classes125 and 250 , 2013 .

ASME B16.18, Cast Copper Alloy Solder Joint Pressure Fittings, 2001 2012 .

ASME B16.22, Wrought Copper and Copper Alloy Solder- Joint Pressure Fittings, 2001 2013 .

ASME B16.25, Buttwelding Ends, 2007 2012 .

ASME B36.10M, Welded and Seamless Wrought Steel Pipe , 2015 .

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

2 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 143 of 298

Page 149: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

2.3. 3 2 ASTM Publications.

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM A53/A53M, Standard Specification for Pipe, Steel, Black and Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated, Welded andSeamless, 2012.

ASTM A135/A135M, Standard Specification for Electric-Resistance-Welded Steel Pipe, 2009 ( ,reapproved 2014 ) .

ASTM A234/A234M, Standard Specification for Piping Fittings of Wrought Carbon Steel and Alloy Steel forModerate and High Temperatures, 2013e1 2015 .

ASTM A795/A795M, Standard Specification for Black and Hot-Dipped Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) Weldedand Seamless Steel Pipe for Fire Protection Use, 2013.

ASTM B32, Standard Specification for Solder Metal, 2008, reapproved 2014 .

ASTM B43, Standard Specification for Seamless Red Brass Pipe , 2009 Standard Sizes , 2015 .

ASTM B88, Standard Specification for Seamless Copper Water Tube, 2009 2014 .

ASTM B251, Standard Specification for General Requirements for Wrought Seamless Copper andCopper-Alloy Tube, 2010.

ASTM B813, Standard Specification for Liquid and Paste Fluxes for Soldering Applications of Copper andCopper-Alloy Tube, 2010 2016 .

ASTM F437, Standard Specification for Threaded Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic PipeFittings, Schedule 80, 2009 2015 .

ASTM F438, Standard Specification for Socket-Type Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic PipeFittings, Schedule 40, 2009 2015 .

ASTM F439, Standard Specification for Socket-Type Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic PipeFittings, Schedule 80, 2009 2013 .

ASTM F442/F442M , Standard Specification for Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic Pipe(SDR-PR), 2009 2015a .

2.3. 4 3 AWS Publications.

American Welding Society, 550 NW LeJeune Road, 8869 NW 36 Street, #130 , Miami, FL 3312633166-6672 .

AWS A5.8/A5.8M , Specification for Filler Metals for Brazing and Braze Welding, 2004 2011, Amendment1, 2012 .

AWS B2.1/B2.1M , Specification for Welding Procedure and Performance Qualification, 2009 2014,Amendment 1, 2015 .

2.3. 5 4 Other Publications.

Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 11th edition, Merriam-Webster, Inc., Springfield, MA, 2003.

2.4 References for Extracts in Mandatory Sections.

NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, 2016 edition.

NFPA 5000® , Building Construction and Safety Code®, 2015 edition.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Referenced current SDO names, addresses, standard names, numbers, and editions.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 2-NFPA 13R-2015 [Chapter B]

Submitter Information Verification

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

3 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 144 of 298

Page 150: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Submitter Full Name: Aaron Adamczyk

Organization: [ Not Specified ]

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sun Dec 20 18:16:00 EST 2015

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

4 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 145 of 298

Page 151: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 98-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 2.3.2 ]

2.3.2 ASME Publications.

American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Two Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990.

ASME A17.1, Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators, 2004.

ASME B16.1, Gray Iron Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings, Classes 25, 125, and 250, 2010.

ASME B16.3, Malleable Iron Threaded Fittings, Classes 150 and 300, 2006.

ASME B16.4, Gray Iron Threaded Fittings, Classes 125 and 250, 2006.

ASME B16.5, Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings, NPS 1/2 through NPS 24 Metric/Inch Standard, 2009.

ASME B16.9, Factory-Made Wrought Buttwelding Fittings, 2007.

ASME B16.11, Forged Fittings, Socket-Welding and Threaded, 2009.

ANSI/ASME B16.15, Cast Bronze Threaded Fittings, 2009.

ASME B16.18, Cast Copper Alloy Solder Joint Pressure Fittings, 2001.

ASME B16.22, Wrought Copper and Copper Alloy Solder Joint Pressure Fittings, 2001.

ASME B16.25, Buttwelding Ends, 2007.

ASME B16.51 Copper and Copper Alloy Press-Connect Pressure Fittings

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Currently 13R does not currently reference ASME B16.51 This Standard establishes requirements for cast copper alloy, wrought copper, and wrought copper alloy, press-connect pressure fittings for use with hard drawn seamless copper water tube conforming to ASTM B88 for piping systems conveying water. The press-connect system (tube, fitting, and joint) conforming to this Standard is for use at a maximum pressure of 1 380 kPa (200 psi) over the temperature range from 0°C to 93°C (32°F to 200°F). This Standard provides requirements for fittings suitable for press-connect joining and covers the following:(a) size designations(b) pressure–temperature ratings(c) terminology(d) dimensions and tolerances(e) materials(f) design qualification(g) required installation instructions(h) markings By adding this standard, this will direct users to the correct design and material dimensions for copper press-connect fittings.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Mark Fasel

Organization: Viega Llc

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 15:02:23 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

5 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 146 of 298

Page 152: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 7-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ]

2.3.3 ASTM Publications.

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM A53/A53M, Standard Specification for Pipe, Steel, Black and Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated, Welded andSeamless, 2012.

ASTM A135/A135M, Standard Specification for Electric-Resistance-Welded Steel Pipe, 2009 (2014).

ASTM A234/A234M, Standard Specification for Piping Fittings of Wrought Carbon Steel and Alloy Steel forModerate and High Temperatures, 2013e1.

ASTM A795/A795M, Standard Specification for Black and Hot-Dipped Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) Weldedand Seamless Steel Pipe for Fire Protection Use, 2013.

ASTM B32, Standard Specification for Solder Metal, 2008.

ASTM B43, Standard Specification for Seamless Red Brass Pipe, 2009.

ASTM B88, Standard Specification for Seamless Copper Water Tube, 2009.

ASTM B251, Standard Specification for General Requirements for Wrought Seamless Copper andCopper-Alloy Tube, 2010.

ASTM B813, Standard Specification for Liquid and Paste Fluxes for Soldering Applications of Copper andCopper-Alloy Tube, 2010.

ASTM F437, Standard Specification for Threaded Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic PipeFittings, Schedule 80, 2009 2015 .

ASTM F438, Standard Specification for Socket-Type Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic PipeFittings, Schedule 40, 2009 2015 .

ASTM F439, Standard Specification for Socket-Type Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic PipeFittings, Schedule 80, 2009 2013 .

ASTM F442, Standard Specification for Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic Pipe (SDR-PR),2009 2013 e1 .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

updates

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Marcelo Hirschler

Organization: GBH International

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jan 06 18:24:24 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

6 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 147 of 298

Page 153: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 69-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 2.3.5 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Underwriters Laboratories Publications

ANSI/UL 213 Standard for Rubber Gasketed Fittings, 2004.

ANSI/UL 852 Standard for Metallic Sprinkler Pipe for Fire Protection Service, 2008.

ANSI/UL 1821 Standard for Thermoplastic Sprinkler Pipe and Fittings For Fire Protection Service,2015.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Currently the UL 213, UL 852 and UL 1821 Standards are not referenced by NFPA 13R but are widely used standards for Rubber Gasketed Fittings for Fire Protection Service, Metallic Sprinkler Pipe for Fire Protection Service and Thermoplastic sprinkler pipe and fittings for Fire protection service. The addition of the publications coincides with the related public input submittals and will help to more clearly identify accepted reference standards for fire protection pipe and fittings.The addition of these publications coincides with the related public input submittals. There is no fiscal impact associated with this proposal.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 61-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. 5.2.9 [Excluding any Sub-Sections]]

Public Input No. 70-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. 5.2.1 [Excluding any Sub-Sections]]

Public Input No. 72-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. 5.2.10]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Mark Fasel

Organization: Viega Llc

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sat Jun 11 12:14:14 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

7 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 148 of 298

Page 154: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 30-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.1 ]

3.3.2 Carport

An open to atmosphere covered parking area open on at least two sides.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

The IBC indicates that a carport must be open on at least two sides. There has been some confusion in that there are sometimes overhangs in front of garages that are only open on a single side. These areas should be protected especially when there are living units above.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Feb 25 15:44:15 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

8 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 149 of 298

Page 155: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 23-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 3.3.4 ]

3.3.4 Dwelling Unit.

One or more rooms, arranged for the use of one or more individuals living together, as in a singlehousekeeping unit, that normally have cooking, living, sanitary , and sleeping facilities and sleepingfacilities as well as directly connected outdoor sitting areas, storage closets and vehicle parking .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

It is important to note that in regards to NFPA 13R, connected resident garages, balconies and storage closets (as found on porches or within the dwelling unit) are considered part of the dwelling unit.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sun Feb 14 17:58:09 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

9 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 150 of 298

Page 156: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 60-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.7.2 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Press-Connect Fitting-

A permanent mechanical connection for joining copper tubing, steel and stainless steel pipe utilizingelastomeric seal or an elastomeric seal and corrosion-resistant grip ring or rings. Fitting connections aremade with a pressing tool and jaws or rings approved by the fitting manufacturer for use in accordance withthe product listing.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Currently there is no definition for Press-Connect fittings in NFPA 13R. The term Press-Connect Fitting is used in both the IAPMO and ICC codes. The wide use of Mechanical type fittings has created the need to identify fittings such as Press-Connect and provide definitions to prevent confusion between mechanical fitting types and to help identify the correct standards these fittings are required to be listed to. This definition is proposed to prevent confusion within the industry and aligns definitions for these type fittings. This definition will also help to prevent incorrect terminology in the industry such as referring to Press-Connect fittings as Propress which we have all commonly seen. As the Manufacturer of Propress we do like that our brand name is the name used by those in the industry when referring to Press-Connect fittings, but we do want the industry to have the correct terminology of the fittings to avoid any confusion between manufactured products.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 71-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. 5.2.11]

Public Input No. 72-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. 5.2.10]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Mark Fasel

Organization: Viega Llc

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 01 14:20:59 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

10 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 151 of 298

Page 157: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 19-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 3.3.9 ]

3.3.9 Residential Occupancies.

Occupancies that include the that can be found in the following, as defined in NFPA 101: (1) apartmentbuildings, (2) lodging and rooming houses, (3) board and care facilities, and (4) hotels, motels, anddormitories.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

NFPA 13R is appropriate for use in a residential occupancy. In the list of building types included in this definition, there are situations where there will be mixed occupancies and NFPA 13R would not be the appropriate sprinkler system for some of those occupancies.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Feb 05 15:31:50 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

11 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 152 of 298

Page 158: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 31-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 3.3.13 ]

3.3.13 System Working Pressure.

The maximum anticipated static (nonflowing) or flowing pressure applied to sprinkler system componentsexclusive of surge pressures and exclusive of pressure from the fire department connection .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Correlates with NFPA 13.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Feb 25 16:00:34 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

12 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 153 of 298

Page 159: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 93-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 5.1.3 ]

5.1.3 Rated Pressure.

System components shall be rated for the maximum system working pressure to which they are exposedbut shall not be rated at less than 175 psi (12.1 bar) for components installed above ground and 150 psi(10.4 bar) for components installed underground between the water supply and the system riser. When theunderground piping can be supplied or pressurized by a Fire Department Connection (FDC), theunderground piping shall be designed to withstand a working pressure of not less than 200 psi (Class 200),or 50 psi greater than the system design pressure, whichever is greater.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

This PI intends to require higher pressure ratings for underground lines that can be fed by Fire Department Connections. Delivery of water at Fire Department Connections can cause pressures that exceed 150 psi. Typically, use of 200 psi rated line can withstand the pressures delivered at the FDC. However, when higher pressures are required at the FDC due to system demands, the underground line is required to be listed for 50 psi above that demand pressure. The 50 psi above design pressure is to allow for pipe to be listed for the pressure used during the hydrostatic test.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Lynn Nielson

Organization: City Of Henderson

Affilliation: Self

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 13:32:39 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

13 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 154 of 298

Page 160: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 70-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 5.2.1 [Excluding any Sub-Sections] ]

Pipe or tube used in sprinkler systems shall be of the materials specified in Table 5.2.1 or in accordancewith 5.2.2.

Table 5.2.1 Pipe or Tube Materials and Dimensions

Materials and Dimensions Standard

Standard Specification for Black and Hot-Dipped Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) Welded andSeamless Steel Pipe for Fire Protection Use

ASTM A795

Standard Specification for Pipe, Steel, Black and Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated, Welded andSeamless

ASTM A53

Welded and Seamless Wrought Steel PipeANSIB36.10M

Standard Specification for Electric-Resistance-Welded Steel Pipe ASTM A135

Standard Specification for Seamless Copper Water Tube [Copper Tube (Drawn, Seamless)] ASTM B88

Standard Specification for General Requirements for Wrought Seamless Copper andCopper-Alloy Tube

ASTM B251

Standard Specification for Liquid and Paste Fluxes for Soldering Applications of Copper andCopper-Alloy Tube

ASTM B813

Specification for Filler Metals for Brazing and Braze Welding (Classification BCuP-3 orBCuP-4)

AWS A5.8

Standard Specification for Solder Metal Section 1: Solder Alloys Containing Less than0.2 percent lead (Pb) as identified in ASTM B32, Table 5, Section 1, and having a solidustemperature that exceeds 400°F (204°C)

ASTM B32

Cast Bronze Threaded FittingsASMEB16.15

Standard Specification for Seamless Red Brass Pipe

Standard for Metallic Sprinkler Pipe for Fire Protection Service

ASTM B43

UL 852

Nonmetallic Piping

Standard Specification for Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic Pipe (SDR-PR)

Standard for Thermoplastic Sprinkler Pipe and Fittings for Fire Protection Service

ASTM F442

UL 1821

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

UL 1821 and UL 852 standards are widely used standards for Plastic Pipe and Fittings and Metallic Pipe for Fire Protection Services. Currently these standards are not mentioned as a reference standards in the pipe or fittings tables. The addition of the standard will also be consistent with referenced standards in the ICC Fire Code TABLE AG101.1 and Section AG102 for UL 1821 and will help guide manufacturer's to another widely used Standard for Metallic Sprinkler Pipe for Fire Protection Service and will help to prevent confusion within the industry as to the applicable standards for Fire Protection piping for materials.. This addition will guide manufacturers, designers and installers to the correct standards that comply with NFPA 13, 13R and 13D requirements which these same changes have been proposed. There is no fiscal impact associated with these proposals. UL 1821 has additional performance requirements above and beyond the other listed non-metallic pipe standard in this table and should be added.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 69-NFPA 13R-2016 [New Section after 2.3.5] Reference Standard Publications

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

14 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 155 of 298

Page 161: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Mark Fasel

Organization: Viega Llc

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sat Jun 11 12:18:55 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

15 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 156 of 298

Page 162: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 86-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 5.2.1.3 ]

5.2.1.4

Nonmetallic pipe used in isolated portions of wet pipe sprinkler systems where that portion of the system isprovided with a pressure-reducing valve set to no more than 80 psi (5.5 bar) shall be designed to withstanda working pressure not less than 130 psi (9 bar) at 120°F (49°C) and 100 psi (6.9 bar) at 180°F (82°C).

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

By requiring that system components be rated at 175 psi an assurance is made that there will be no failures due to excessive pressure in the system coming either from a fire pump or from a fire truck when they arrive on scene and hook up to the fire department connection on the outside of the building. The purpose of the fire department connection is both to provide a reliable water supply to supplement the sprinkler system and to provide water pressure and flow in the standpipe for fire department hose connections. There is no reason for the sprinkler system to have excessive pressure applied to the sprinklers themselves, simply providing a sustainable water flow is enough. Therefore, limiting the pressure to 80 psi with the use of pressure reducing valves will not have a negative impact on the performance of the sprinkler system. In fact in many cases there are reduced pressure zone valves coming off standpipes for the sprinkler system on each floor already. If the pressure is limited to 80 psi for each zone/area utilizing a non-metallic type of pipe that doesn’t have the 175 psi pressure rating there should be no issues allowing the use of these types of pipes in 13R applications. Precedence for this has been set in NFPA 13D with the allowance of a wet pipe standalone sprinkler system utilizing non-metallic pipe that has a listed pressure below 175 psi as long as the pressure was limited to no more than 80 psi.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 85-NFPA 13R-2016 [New Section after 5.1.3]

Public Input No. 87-NFPA 13R-2016 [New Section after 5.2.9.3]

Public Input No. 88-NFPA 13R-2016 [New Section after 6.13]

Public Input No. 89-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. 10.2.2.1]

Public Input No. 90-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. 10.2.2.1]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Melisa Rodriguez

Organization: Uponor

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 28 17:43:27 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

16 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 157 of 298

Page 163: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 48-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 5.2.2.2 ]

5.2.2.3

Pipe or tube listed for light hazard occupancies shall be permitted to be installed in concealed spaces aboveordinary hazard rooms.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

In many residential buildings, there are private garages that exceed 400 square feet. However, many of these garages are protected with residential sprinklers or standard sprinklers with a .05 density. These concealed spaces are generally wood floor trusses with dwelling units above. The concealed space itself is technically light hazard and in most cases it is a rated assembly. In the spirit of providing life safety verses property protection, non metallic piping should be allowed to run in these spaces even when the room is greater than 400 square feet.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu May 26 10:37:41 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

17 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 158 of 298

Page 164: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 76-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 5.2.2.2 ]

Add new Sections 5.2.2.2.1 and 5.2.2.2.2

5.2.2.2.1

Pipe or tube installed in accordance with 5.2.2.2 shall be permitted to be installed exposed, in accordancewith their listing.

5.2.2.2.2

Pipe or tube installed in accordance with 5.2.2.2 shall be permitted to be installed in ordinary hazard rooms

larger than 400 ft 2 (37 m 2 ) where the pipe is concealed within a 1-hour fire resistance-rated assembly.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

New Section 5.2.2.1 is a clarification and makes NFPA 13R consistent with Section 6.3.9.6.1 of NFPA 13.

In residential buildings with ordinary hazard rooms larger than 400 square feet, the installer is required to transition from listed nonmetallic pipe to metallic pipe. New Section 5.2.2.2.2 eliminates that issue. The requirement to install the pipe or tube within a 1-hour fire resistance-rated assembly will insure the integrity of the piping systems until the sprinkler heads activate.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Donald Townley

Organization: Lubrizol

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 23 12:53:03 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

18 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 159 of 298

Page 165: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 61-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 5.2.9 [Excluding any Sub-Sections] ]

Fittings used in sprinkler systems shall meet or exceed the standards in Table 5.2.9 or be in accordancewith 5.2.12.

Table 5.2.9 Fittings Materials and Dimensions

Materials and Dimensions Standard

Cast Iron

Gray Iron Threaded Fittings (Class 125 and 250) ASME B16.4

Gray Iron Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings ASME B16.1

Malleable Iron

Malleable Iron Threaded Fittings ASME B16.3

Steel

Factory-Made Wrought Buttwelding Fittings ASME B16.9

Buttwelding EndsASMEB16.25

Standard Specification for Piping Fittings of Wrought Carbon Steel and Alloy Steel forModerate and High Temperatures

ASTM A234

Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings (Nickel Alloy and Other Special Alloys) ASME B16.5

Forged Fittings, Socket-Welding and Threaded

Rubber Gasketed Fittings for Fire Protection Service

ASMEB16.11

UL 213

Copper

Wrought Copper and Copper Alloy Solder Joint Pressure FittingsASMEB16.22

Cast Copper Alloy Solder Joint Pressure Fittings

Rubber Gaskedted Fittings for Fire Protection Service

ASMEB16.18

UL 213

CPVC

Standard Specification for Threaded Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic PipeFittings, Schedule 80

ASTM F437

Standard Specification for Socket-Type Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) PlasticPipe Fittings, Schedule 40

ASTM F438

Standard Specification for Socket-Type Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) PlasticPipe Fittings, Schedule 80

Standard for Thermoplastic Sprinkler Pipe and Fittings for Fire Protection Service

ASTM F439

UL 1821

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

UL 213 is currently not referenced by NFPA 13R. UL 213 is a widely used standard for Rubber Gasketed Fittings for Fire Protection Service for Steel, Stainless Steel and Copper fittings.. Many manufacturers are listed to UL 213 and having a reference in the code will help to identify the correct standard for building officials as well as sprinkler designers. As more manufacturers produce press-connect and similar type fittings, this addition will help to guide them to a standard that meets NFPA 13R requirements.

UL 1821 standard is a widely used standard for Plastic Pipe and Fittings for Fire Protection Service. Currently this standard is not mentioned as a referenced standard in the pipe or fittings table. The addition of the standard will

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

19 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 160 of 298

Page 166: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

also be consistent with referenced standards in the ICC Fire Code TABLE AG101.1 and Section AG102 and will help to prevent confusion within the industry. This addition will guide manufacturers, designers and installers to the correct standards that comply with NFPA 13, 13R and 13D requirements which these same changes have been proposed.

There is no fiscal impact for these proposals.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 69-NFPA 13R-2016 [New Section after 2.3.5] UL Reference Standard Publications

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Mark Fasel

Organization: Viega Llc

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 01 14:26:31 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

20 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 161 of 298

Page 167: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 99-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 5.2.9 [Excluding any Sub-Sections] ]

Fittings used in sprinkler systems shall meet or exceed the standards in Table 5.2.9 or be in accordancewith 5.2.12.

Table 5.2.9 Fittings Materials and Dimensions

Materials and Dimensions Standard

Cast Iron

Gray Iron Threaded Fittings (Class 125 and 250) ASME B16.4

Gray Iron Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings ASME B16.1

Malleable Iron

Malleable Iron Threaded Fittings ASME B16.3

Steel

Factory-Made Wrought Buttwelding Fittings ASME B16.9

Buttwelding EndsASMEB16.25

Standard Specification for Piping Fittings of Wrought Carbon Steel and Alloy Steel forModerate and High Temperatures

ASTM A234

Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings (Nickel Alloy and Other Special Alloys) ASME B16.5

Forged Fittings, Socket-Welding and ThreadedASMEB16.11

Copper

Wrought Copper and Copper Alloy Solder Joint Pressure FittingsASMEB16.22

Cast Copper Alloy Solder Joint Pressure FittingsASMEB16.18

Copper and Copper Alloy Press-Connect Pressure FittingsASMEB16.51

CPVC

Standard Specification for Threaded Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic PipeFittings, Schedule 80

ASTM F437

Standard Specification for Socket-Type Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic PipeFittings, Schedule 40

ASTM F438

Standard Specification for Socket-Type Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic PipeFittings, Schedule 80

ASTM F439

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Currently NFPA 13R does not currently reference ASME B16.51 This Standard establishes requirements for cast copper alloy, wrought copper, and wrought copper alloy, press-connect pressure fittings for use with hard drawn seamless copper water tube conforming to ASTM B88 for piping systems conveying water. The press-connect system (tube, fitting, and joint) conforming to this Standard is for use at a maximum pressure of 1 380 kPa (200 psi) over the temperature range from 0°C to 93°C (32°F to 200°F). This Standard provides requirements for fittings suitable for press-connect joining and covers the following:(a) size designations(b) pressure–temperature ratings(c) terminology(d) dimensions and tolerances(e) materials

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

21 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 162 of 298

Page 168: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

(f) design qualification(g) required installation instructions(h) markings By adding this standard, this will direct users to the correct design and material dimensions for copper press-connect fittings.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Mark Fasel

Organization: Viega Llc

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 15:09:00 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

22 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 163 of 298

Page 169: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 87-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 5.2.9.3 ]

5.2.9.4

Nonmetallic fittings used in isolated portions of wet pipe sprinkler systems where that portion of the systemis provided with a pressure-reducing valve set to no more than 80 psi (5.5 bar) shall be designed towithstand a working pressure not less than 130 psi (9 bar) at 120°F (49°C) and 100 psi (6.9 bar) at 180°F(82°C).

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

By requiring that system components be rated at 175 psi an assurance is made that there will be no failures due to excessive pressure in the system coming either from a fire pump or from a fire truck when they arrive on scene and hook up to the fire department connection on the outside of the building. The purpose of the fire department connection is both to provide a reliable water supply to supplement the sprinkler system and to provide water pressure and flow in the standpipe for fire department hose connections. There is no reason for the sprinkler system to have excessive pressure applied to the sprinklers themselves, simply providing a sustainable water flow is enough. Therefore, limiting the pressure to 80 psi with the use of pressure reducing valves will not have a negative impact on the performance of the sprinkler system. In fact in many cases there are reduced pressure zone valves coming off standpipes for the sprinkler system on each floor already. If the pressure is limited to 80 psi for each zone/area utilizing a non-metallic type of pipe that doesn’t have the 175 psi pressure rating there should be no issues allowing the use of these types of pipes in 13R applications. Precedence for this has been set in NFPA 13D with the allowance of a wet pipe standalone sprinkler system utilizing non-metallic pipe that has a listed pressure below 175 psi as long as the pressure was limited to no more than 80 psi. This is the same language submitted for the justification for 5.1.3.1 and 5.2.1.4.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 85-NFPA 13R-2016 [New Section after 5.1.3]

Public Input No. 86-NFPA 13R-2016 [New Section after 5.2.1.3]

Public Input No. 88-NFPA 13R-2016 [New Section after 6.13]

Public Input No. 89-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. 10.2.2.1]

Public Input No. 90-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. 10.2.2.1]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Melisa Rodriguez

Organization: Uponor

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 28 17:47:43 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

23 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 164 of 298

Page 170: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 72-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 5.2.10 ]

5.2.10

Joints for the connection of copper pipe shall be press-connect or brazed on dry pipe and preactionsystems.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

The current language implies that only brazed fittings are to be used in dry pipe and pre-action systems. Copper Press Connect fittings listed to UL 213 Rubber Gasketed Fittings for Fire Protection Service are listed for use in dry and pre-action systems. This modification to the section will remove confusion in this section that only brazed fittings are suitable for these applications.There is no cost associated with this revision.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 60-NFPA 13R-2016 [New Section after 3.3.7.2] Definition of Press-Connect Fittings.

Public Input No. 69-NFPA 13R-2016 [New Section after 2.3.5] Refernce Standard inclusion for UL 213

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Mark Fasel

Organization: Viega Llc

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sat Jun 11 12:39:00 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

24 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 165 of 298

Page 171: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 71-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 5.2.11 ]

5.2.11

Joints for the connection of copper pipe for wet systems shall use solder joints with 95-5 solder metal or ,press-connect, or be brazed.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Currently only soldered or brazed joints are allowed for joining copper per this section.

The addition of press-connect will eliminate the confusion for allowable copper pipe joining as press-connect fittings are the most widely used joints outside of brazed or soldered joints. Section 5.2.9 allows other types of fittings to be used where listed for sprinkler systems but there is a need to identify press-connect fittings within the body of the code as their use is now very familiar with building officials, designers and installers and it will help to clarify terminology when referring to these fittings as Press-Connect and not Propress or Sharkbite names which are commonly used to describe Press-Connect and Push Fit style fittings. By adding this terminology it will eliminate confusion of the name of the fitting type.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 60-NFPA 13R-2016 [New Section after 3.3.7.2] Definition of Press-Connect Fitting

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Mark Fasel

Organization: Viega Llc

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sat Jun 11 12:32:29 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

25 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 166 of 298

Page 172: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 44-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 5.2.14.1.2 ]

5.2.14.1.2 Valve Closure Time.

Unless the requirements of 6.8.5 apply, listed Listed indicating valves shall not close in less than5 seconds when operated at maximum possible speed from the fully open position.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

The allowance to use 1/4 turn valves on backflow preventers was removed in 2016. This reference was missed.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu May 19 10:25:41 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

26 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 167 of 298

Page 173: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 49-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 6.2.1.3 [Excluding any Sub-Sections] ]

Listed quick-response sprinklers shall be permitted to be installed in dwelling units meeting the definition ofa compartment, as defined in Section 3.3, where no more than four sprinklers are located in the dwellingunit .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

There is no reason to limit the use of quick response sprinklers to a dwelling unit of 4 sprinklers. The density is double what is required of a residential sprinkler and is adequate for NFPA 13. Also, if there were 6 sprinklers in the dwelling unit, then per 6.2.1.3.1, the design area would be 6 sprinklers.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu May 26 10:48:44 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

27 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 168 of 298

Page 174: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 25-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 6.2.2 ]

6.2.2 Outside Dwelling Units.

6.2.2.1

Sprinklers outside of the dwelling units shall be quick response, except as permitted by 6.2.2.2 or6 . 2.2.3 .

6.2.2.1.1

The sprinkler design criteria shall be in accordance with Chapter 7.

6.2.2.2

The following types of spaces shall be permitted to be protected by residential sprinklers in accordance withSection 7.1:

(1) Lobbies not in hotels and motels

(2) Foyers

(3) Corridors

(4) Halls

(5) Lounges

(6) Ordinary hazard areas in accordance with 7.2.4.1

(7) Garages in accordance in accordance with 7.3.3 and 7.3.3.1(1)

(8) Other areas with fire loads similar to residential fire loads

6.2.2.3

Standard response sprinklers shall be permitted in garages in accordance with 7.3.2.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Currently all sprinklers outside the dwelling unit must be quick response or residential. In garages, many times it is difficult to route wet sprinkler piping to the limitations of a standard spray quick response sidewall sprinkler. In some configurations a dry system has to be installed. Allowing Standard response sprinklers will give the user more options.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Feb 24 16:03:50 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

28 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 169 of 298

Page 175: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 100-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 6.2.3.3.2 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Type your content here ...

Sprinklers in closets containing ventless clothes dryers shall be of the intermediate-temperatureclassification or higher.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Ventless clothes dryers placed within closets have the potential to raise ceiling temperatures above 100 F (38 C) for sustained periods of time, potentially weakening the operating mechanisms of ordinary temperature rated fire sprinklers over months or years of use, leading to inadvertent operations. While ventless clothes dryers have been used in Europe for many years, they are fairly new to the North American market, where vented clothes dryers have been the norm. More expensive than vented dryers, they generally incorporate condensers in a “two-loop” system to first heat some incoming air, allowing it to absorb moisture from the damp clothes, then continually condense the heated moist air to release the water before recirculating the resulting dry air within the clothes dryer. Unlike vented dryers, where moist heated air is exhausted to the building exterior, these devices capture the water to a drain or pan, while the heat from the condensing cycle is exhausted into the immediate area.

The condensers in combination machines that both wash and dry the clothes are generally water-cooled, such that quantities of cold water are used to condense the moisture evaporated from the clothes during the drying cycle, and pumped away through the drain line. But the standalone dryer units are air-cooled, using the ambient air as a heat sink. While this heat can be dissipated in a large laundry room, it can be expected to raise the temperatures within a laundry closet to levels unacceptable for ordinary temperature rated sprinklers. All standalone ventless dryers in the market are reportedly of this type.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Russell Fleming

Organization: International Fire Sprinkler Assn. / NFSA

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 16:04:06 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

29 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 170 of 298

Page 176: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 45-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 6.2.3.3.3 ]

6.2.3.3.3.1

Sprinklers adjacent to diffusers shall not be required to meet 6.2.3.3.3 where the temperature from thediffuser does not exceed:

(1) 100°F (38°C) when utilizing ordinary temperature sprinklers.

(2) 150° (66°C) when utilizing intermediate temperature sprinklers.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

This is language that is similar to NFPA 13 8.3.2.5 (9). In many places HVAC Air handlers do not produce high temperatures. The ability to ignore the spacing away from these diffusers simplifies the installation.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu May 19 10:28:22 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

30 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 171 of 298

Page 177: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 91-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 6.2.3.3.3 ]

6.2.3.3.3 *

Sprinklers installed near specific heat sources that are identified in Table 6.2.3.3.3 shall be of thetemperature rating indicated in Table 6.2.3.3.3 unless sprinklers are listed for positioning closer to the heatsource.

Table 6.2.3.3.3 Minimum Distances for Ordinary and Intermediate Temperature Residential Sprinklers

Heat Source

From Edge

of Source to OrdinaryTemperature Sprinkler

From Edge of Source to IntermediateTemperature Sprinkler

in. mm in. mm

Side of open or recessedfireplace

36 900 12 300

Front of recessed fireplace 60 1500 36 900

Coal- or wood-

burning stove42 1050 12 300

Kitchen range 18 450 9 225

Wall oven 18 450 9 225

Hot air flues 18 450 9 225

Uninsulated heat ducts 18 450 9 225

Uninsulated hot water pipes 12 300 6 150

Side of ceiling- or wall-mountedhot air diffusers

24 600 12 300

Front of wall-mounted hot airdiffusers

36 900 18 450

Hot water heater or furnace 6 150 3 75

Light fixture:

0 W–250 W 6 150 3 75

 250 W–499 W 12 300 6 150

Additional Proposed Changes

File Name Description Approved

Fireplace2.pdf Guidance for spacing around fireplaces

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

The language provided in the table provides ambiguous information about spacing sprinklers with regard to fireplaces. These diagrams provide additional clarification. Alternatively, the Annex comment could be attached to 6.2.3.3.3.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 92-NFPA 13R-2016 [New Section after A.6.2.3.3]

Submitter Information Verification

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

31 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 172 of 298

Page 178: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

36” 36”

60”

Recessed Fireplace: 60” from open face, 36” from sides of opening

Page 173 of 298

Page 179: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

36” 36”

Open Fireplace: 36” from faces with radiused corners

Page 174 of 298

Page 180: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Submitter Full Name: Robert Upson

Organization: National Fire Sprinkler Association

Affilliation: NFSA Engineering and Standards Committee

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 10:30:12 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

32 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 175 of 298

Page 181: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 66-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 6.3 ]

6.3.1

Where quick response sprinklers are used in garages, garage doors shall not be considered obstructionsand sprinklers shall not be required to be installed below garage doors.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

This language was previously found in Chapter 7 (Design criteria). It should be in the installation chapter

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 02 13:43:22 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

33 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 176 of 298

Page 182: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 82-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 6.4.6.1.1 ]

6.4.6.1.2

Pendent and upright sprinklers installed in accordance with 7.1.1.3.1 shall be permitted to be installedwithin 3 inches below a beam having a depth no greater than 14 in.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Both NFPA 13D and NFPA 13R allow for installation of sprinklers below beamed ceilings in the discharge criteria, however, as the listing for installation below beams up to 14 inches has been removed from their certification for this application in response to the FPRF research on this topic in 2011, the proper installation of the sprinklers below the beamed ceilings needs to be addressed in the installation chapter of NFPA 13R and 13D. These proposals address the deflector distance below the beams.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Louis Guerrazzi

Organization: National Fire Sprinkler Association

Affilliation: UL/FM/NFSA Standards Review Committee

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 28 10:58:47 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

34 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 177 of 298

Page 183: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 77-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 6.4.6.1.2 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Type your content here ...

The requirements of 6.4.6.1.1 shall not apply for residential occupancies with ceilings of noncombustible orlimited-combustible construction where either X.X.X.X (A) or X.X.X.X (B) applies.

(A) Where a vertical change in ceiling elevation within the area of coverage of the sprinkler creates adistance of more than 12 in. (300 mm) between the upper ceiling and the sprinkler deflector, a vertical planeextending down from the ceiling at the change in elevation shall be considered a wall for the purpose ofsprinkler spacing as shown in Figure X.X.X.X (A).

(B) Where the distance between the upper ceiling and the sprinkler deflector is less than or equal to 12 in.(300 mm), the sprinklers shall be permitted to be spaced as though the ceiling was flat, provided theobstruction rules are observed as shown in Figure X.X.X.X (B).

Additional Proposed Changes

File Name Description Approved

vertical_change.jpg

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

The proposed chance provides guidance on how to position residential pendent sprinklers under ceilings with varying ceiling planes.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Mark Fessenden

Organization: Tyco Fire Protection Products

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 23 16:12:44 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

35 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 178 of 298

Page 184: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Page 179 of 298

Page 185: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 78-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 6.4.6.1.2 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Type your content here ...

The requirements of 6.6.1.1 shall not apply for residential pendent sprinklers installed as show in FigureX.X.X.X (A) or Figure X.X.X.X (B).

Additional Proposed Changes

File Name Description Approved

Beam_Figures.jpg

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

7.1.1.3.1 (2) or 7.1.1.3.1 (4) describes how to calculate sprinklers under a beamed ceiling, but no similar criteria exists telling how to install those sprinklers. The proposed chance provides guidance on how to position residential pendent sprinklers under beamed ceilings.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Mark Fessenden

Organization: Tyco Fire Protection Products

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 23 16:47:11 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

36 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 180 of 298

Page 186: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Page 181 of 298

Page 187: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 84-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 6.4.6.1.3 ]

Add new section in NFPA 13R, to allow the positioning of sprinklers within a compartment which isdescribed by section 7.1.1.3 in the Number of Design Sprinklers section.

6.4.6.1.4 Residential Pendent sprinklers shall be permitted to be installed under or adjacent to beams inaccordance with one of the following installation criteria:

a.) Pendent, recesses pendent and concealed sprinklers shall be permitted to be installeddirectly under a beam with a maximum depth of 14” without regard to the ceiling to deflectordistance.

b.) Pendent sprinklers, including flush type pendent sprinklers, shall be permitted to beinstalled adjacent to beams when the vertical centerline of the sprinkler is no greater than2-inches from the edge of the beam and the deflector or heat collector distance below the beamis installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s published documentation.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Add new section in NFPA 13R, to allow the positioning of sprinklers within a compartment which is described by section 7.1.1.3 in the Number of Design Sprinklers section. The recent elimination of the specific UL test protocol and criteria for sloped ceiling configurations has caused confusion as to the type and position of sprinklers allowed certain configurations described in the Number of Design Sprinklers section. Current guidelines, which are limited in detail and are open to interpretation, clarification on the positioning of sprinklers to take advantage of section 7.1.1.3 is required as the standard currently leaves much open to interpretation.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: John Desrosier

Organization: Tyco Fire Pro

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 28 16:13:32 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

37 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 182 of 298

Page 188: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 83-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 6.4.6.2.2 ]

6.4.6.2.2

Sidewall sprinklers that have been listed with specific positioning criteria shall with specific deflector toceiling distances shall be positioned in accordance with the listing.

Also add section

6.4.6.2.4 Residential sidewall shall be permitted to be installed at the peak of the ceiling spraying down theslope, or along the wall spraying across the slope as long as the spacing is in accordance with themanufacturer’s design guidelines.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Clarify the intent of section 6.4.6.2 and add new section in NFPA 13 R, to allow the positioning of sprinklers within a compartment which is described by section 7.1.1.3 in the Number of Design Sprinklers section.The recent elimination of the specific UL test protocol and criteria for sloped ceiling configurations has caused confusion as to the type and position of sprinklers allowed certain configurations described in the Number of Design Sprinklers section. Current guidelines, which are limited in detail and are open to interpretation, clarification on the positioning of sprinklers to take advantage of section 7.1.1.3 is required as the standard currently leaves much open to interpretation.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: John Desrosier

Organization: Tyco Fire Pro

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 28 16:11:02 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

38 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 183 of 298

Page 189: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 67-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 6.4.6.3 ]

6.4.6.3.9 Garage Doors

6.4.6.3.9.1 Where residential sprinklers are used in garages, garage doors shall not be consideredobstructions and sprinklers shall not be required to be installed below garage doors.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

This language was previously found in Chapter 7 (Discharge Criteria). This language belongs in Chapter 6 (Installation Chapter)

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 02 13:48:18 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

39 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 184 of 298

Page 190: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 46-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 6.4.6.3.2 ]

6.4.6.3.2.1

In all compartments that are not larger than 400 ft 3 (11.33 m 3 ), pendent, upright and sidewall residentialsprinklers shall be permitted to be installed at the highest ceiling level without regard to obstructions.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

In the 2016 edition, this section was modified. The allowance to have a sprinkler 18" down was added. However there was a requirement added that it had to be enclosed by walls and a door. There are many small hallways that are technically compartments with adequate lintels that usually have a light in the center and this would allow the light to not be an obstruction. This is not new language as this is how it read in the 2013 edition and prior.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu May 26 09:41:41 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

40 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 185 of 298

Page 191: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 47-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 6.4.6.3.2 ]

6.4.6.3.2 * Within Closets and Small Compartments .

In all closets and compartments thatare enclosed by walls and a doorand that are not larger than 400 ft3

(11.33 m3), including those housing mechanical equipment, pendent, upright and sidewall residentialsprinklers shall be permitted to be installed in either of the following situations:

(1) Within 18 in. (460 mm) of the ceiling to avoid obstructions near the ceiling

(2) At the highest ceiling level without regard to obstructions or minimum distances to wall

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

This section applies to small compartments as well

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu May 26 09:52:24 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

41 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 186 of 298

Page 192: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 68-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 6.4.6.3.2 ]

6.4.6.3.2* Within Closets.

In all closets and compartments thatare enclosed by walls and a doorand that are not larger than 400 ft3

(11.33 m3), including those housing mechanical equipment, pendent, upright and sidewall residentialsprinklers shall be permitted to be installed in either of the following situations:

(1) Within 18 in. (460 mm) of the ceiling to avoid obstructions near the ceiling

(2) At the highest ceiling level without regard to obstructions or minimum distances to wall

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Bathrooms are allowed to omit sprinkler protection and not have a door. Why is door required for a closet that is protected?

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Roland Huggins

Organization: American Fire Sprinkler Association

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Jun 10 16:54:22 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

42 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 187 of 298

Page 193: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 50-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 6.4.6.3.4.3 ]

6.4.6.3.4.3.1

Sprinklers shall be permitted to be installed closer than 3 ft (914 mm) from an obstruction such as a light inhallways where the obstruction is on the width of the hallway.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Many times in hallways there are lights that create obstructions. If the sprinkler is placed adjacent to the light with the light between the sprinkler and the wall, the amount of obstructed space is minimal. The sprinkler is still protecting the length of the hallway in both directions. This should be an acceptable level of protection as the "shadow" created by that light will be considerably less then 15 square feet.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu May 26 11:16:26 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

43 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 188 of 298

Page 194: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 11-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 6.5.3 ]

6.5.3

A test connection shall be installed that permits the testing of the alarm mechanisms.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Delete this section. 6.10 adequately addresses test connections.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Feb 05 13:37:46 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

44 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 189 of 298

Page 195: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 107-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 6.5.4 ]

6.5.5 Temporary Protection During Construction, Alteration or Demolition

During construction, alteration or demolition, the use of temporary fire sprinkler protection installed inaccordance with approval of the AHJ shall be permitted as supplemental protection of hazardousconditions.

A.6.5.5 During construction, alternation and demolition, there are many hazardous conditions, such ascutting, welding, grinding and hazardous product storage that can be made safer by installing a temporaryfire sprinkler system. Without this section, there would be no allowance in NFPA 13R to permit suchsystems because they would not fully comply with the provisions of the standard. Given that suchprotection would be supplemental to any other protection that would be required, there is no harm inallowing this additional safety feature on a temporary basis if the design and installation is consideredreasonable by the AHJ.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

There is a history of major fires during construction that were associated with hazardous conditions during construction. In some cases, developers will consolidate hazardous operations, such as a welding or grinding area, in a designated area of a building to increase control of the operation. Site managers will sometimes provide temporary sprinkler systems to supplement fire extinguishers and other safety features (not diminishing any other required protection feature) to improve safety, but there have been cases where AHJs have ordered these systems removed because they aren't currently permitted by NFPA 13 or NFPA 13R. Given that it's better to have some protection, as approved by the AHJ, vs.prohibiting an additional measure of safety, this proposal adds an allowance in NFPA 13R to permit temporary installations. A parallel proposal is being submitted to NFPA 13.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Jeffrey Shapiro

Organization: International Code Consultants

Affilliation: National Multifamily Housing Council

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 17:11:48 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

45 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 190 of 298

Page 196: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 94-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 6.6.4 ]

6.6.4*

Sprinklers shall be installed in any closet used for heating or air-conditioning equipment, washers, dryers,or water heaters except as permitted by 6.6.7 . or containing fuel fired equipment.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Sprinkler protection should be required for areas that contain fuel-fired equipment (source of ignition).

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 95-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. 6.6.6.1]

Public Input No. 96-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. 6.6.7]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Lynn Nielson

Organization: City Of Henderson

Affilliation: Self

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 13:37:08 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

46 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 191 of 298

Page 197: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 15-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 6.6.5 [Excluding any Sub-Sections] ]

Except as provided for in 6.6.5.1, sprinklers shall not be required in any porches lanais , porches,balconies, corridors, carports, porte cocheres, and stairs that are open and attached.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

A blog in regards to lanais can be found at

http://sprinkler.blog.nfpa.org/2015/01/introducing-audrey-goldstein-the-fire-sprinkler-initiatives-newest-blogger.html

The technical committee should indicate whether lanais are the same as porches and balconies and sprinklers can be omitted.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Feb 05 13:58:16 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

47 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 192 of 298

Page 198: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 26-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 6.6.5 [Excluding any Sub-Sections] ]

Except as provided for in 6.6.5.1, sprinklers shall not be required in any porches, balconies,corridors carports , carports, porte cocheres, and stairs that are open and attached.

Additional Proposed Changes

File Name Description Approved

Page_654.pdf Page 654 IBC Commentary

Pages_942-943.pdf Pages 942-943 IBC Commentary

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

The 2015 IBC has added section 903.3.1.2.2 which requires sprinklers in open ended corridors and associated stairways that are not separated. This requirement has been included in 1027.6 but the ICC felt it needed to flag the requirement in the NFPA 13R section. As this committee did with the sprinklers on porches in buildings of Type 5 construction, it should align with what is found in the IBC.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 27-NFPA 13R-2016 [New Section after 6.6.9.4]

Public Input No. 28-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. 6.6.7]

Public Input No. 29-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. A.6.6.5]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Feb 25 13:27:13 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

48 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 193 of 298

Page 199: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 9-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 6.6.5 [Excluding any Sub-Sections] ]

Except as provided for in 6.6.5.1, sprinklers shall not be required in any porches, balconies, corridors,carports, and porte cocheres , and stairs that are open and attached.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Being able to egress a building safely in an emergency situation is one of the primary tenets of the building and fire code development process. By removing the exceptions for sprinklers in corridors and stairs, residents will have safe and protected access through the means of egress system.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Mark Miller

Organization: City of Battle Ground

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Jan 15 18:10:07 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

49 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 194 of 298

Page 200: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 109-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 6.6.6.1 ]

6.6.6.1 Such spaces that contain fuel-fired equipment shall also comply with 6.6.6.1 or

6.6.6.2.

6.6.6.1 Where the fuel-fired equipment is above all occupied areas , sprinkler protection shall not berequired in the concealed space.

6.6.6.2 Where fuel-fired equipment is below or on the same level as occupied areas , at least one quick-response intermediate temperature sprinkler shall be installed above the equipment or at the wallseparating the space with the fuel-fired equipment from the occupied space.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

The change reflects recent revisions made to NFPA 13D, Section 8.3.5.1, recognizing that fuel-fired equipment in attics is not uniquely hazardous to warrant the complexity of having to install a single sprinkler in an attic space that will often be required to be protected from freezing. Given the pending prohibition of anti-freeze systems, having to install a freeze-protected single sprinkler over a fuel-fired appliance will become even more difficult in the future.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 108-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. 6.6.6.1]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Jeffrey Shapiro

Organization: International Code Consultants

Affilliation: National Multifamily Housing Council

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 18:13:57 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

50 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 195 of 298

Page 201: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 108-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 6.6.6.1 ]

6.6.6.1

When fuel-fired equipment is present, at least one quick-response intermediate temperature sprinkler shallbe installed above the equipment.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Replaced text in linked proposal to correlate with approach now in NFPA 13D

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 109-NFPA 13R-2016 [New Section after 6.6.6.1]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Jeffrey Shapiro

Organization: International Code Consultants

Affilliation: National Multifamily Housing Council

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 18:11:53 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

51 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 196 of 298

Page 202: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 95-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 6.6.6.1 ]

6.6.6.1

When

Protection of Fuel-Fired Equipment. Where protection of fuel-fired equipment is

present, at

required by 6.6.4, 6.6.6 and 6.6.7, sprinkler protection shall be provided in accordance with the following:

(1) At least one quick-response

intermediate temperature sprinkler

sprinkler with a minimum k-factor of 5.6 shall be

installed

provided above the fuel-fired equipment. Sprinklers shall be sufficient to cover the fuel-fired equipmentprotection area, which is equal to the entire perimeter of the fuel-fired equipment when viewed on a planview.

(2) Where the sprinkler(s) protecting the fuel-fired equipment is located under a ceiling with slope equal toor greater than a 4:12 pitch, a minimum of one sprinkler shall be located above the edge of the fuel-firedequipment protection area, on the upslope side of the equipment.

(3) Freeze protection shall be provided in accordance with 5.4.2.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Sprinkler protection should be required for areas that contain fuel-fired equipment (source of ignition).

The purpose of this PI is to provide minimum design requirements for protection of fuel-fired equipment. Sections 6.6.6 (and proposed 6.6.7) require protection in spaces that contain fuel-fired equipment. However the base code does not provide criteria for protection of these spaces. One interpretation of this code section would indicate that the entire space would need to be provided with fire sprinklers. However, this is not seen as prudent, as it could lead to requiring sprinklers throughout an attic simply due to having a few pieces of fuel-fired equipment in a small portion of the attic. Therefore, this code section is proposed to simply indicate that a minimum of one sprinkler head be located above the fuel-fired equipment. Additional sprinkler heads may be required if there are multiple pieces of equipment, which would together form an area that is called “fuel-fired equipment protection area” and is simply an area with boundaries that contain all fuel-fired equipment within those boundaries. Where there is a slope to the roof, it is felt that the heat from fire will travel up the slope of the roof. Therefore, the proposal requires that in cases where the slope exceeds 4:12, then at least one of the sprinkler heads need to be located at the edge of the protection area on the upslope side, in order to ensure that a head activates.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 94-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. 6.6.4]

Public Input No. 96-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. 6.6.7]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Lynn Nielson

Organization: City Of Henderson

Affilliation: Self

Street Address:

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

52 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 197 of 298

Page 203: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 13:39:35 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

53 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 198 of 298

Page 204: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 28-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 6.6.7 ]

6.6.7

Sprinklers shall not be required in closets (regardless of size) on exterior balconies and exteriorbreezeways/ corridors, regardless of size, as long as the closet does not have doors or unprotectedpenetrations directly into the dwelling unit.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

The term "Breezeway" is not defined in this standard or the IBC. The correct term is corridor.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 26-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. 6.6.5 [Excluding any Sub-Sections]]

Public Input No. 27-NFPA 13R-2016 [New Section after 6.6.9.4]

Public Input No. 29-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. A.6.6.5]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Feb 25 13:56:52 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

54 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 199 of 298

Page 205: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 51-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 6.6.7 ]

6.6.7

Sprinklers shall not be required in closets (regardless of size) on exterior balconies and exterior and openbreezeways/corridors, regardless of size, as long as the closet does not have doors or unprotectedpenetrations directly into the dwelling unit.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

The discussion for removing sprinklers from corridors and breezeways revolves around the term open.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu May 26 11:26:01 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

55 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 200 of 298

Page 206: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 52-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 6.6.7 ]

6.6.7

Sprinklers shall not be required in closets (regardless of size) on exterior balconies and exteriorbreezeways/corridors , regardless of size, as long as the closet does not have doors or unprotectedpenetrations directly into the dwelling unit.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

The use of "regardless of size" terminology does not need to be repeated.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu May 26 11:27:50 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

56 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 201 of 298

Page 207: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 96-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 6.6.7 ]

6.6.7

Sprinklers shall not be required in closets (regardless of size) on exterior balconies and exteriorbreezeways/corridors, regardless of size, as long as the closet does not have doors or unprotectedpenetrations directly into the dwelling unit, and as long as the closet does not contain fuel-fired equipment .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Sprinkler protection should be required for areas that contain fuel-fired equipment (source of ignition).

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 95-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. 6.6.6.1]

Public Input No. 94-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. 6.6.4]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Lynn Nielson

Organization: City Of Henderson

Affilliation: Self

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 13:42:58 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

57 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 202 of 298

Page 208: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 27-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 6.6.9.4 ]

6.6.10 Open-Ended Corridors.

6.6.10.1 Sprinkler protection shall be provided in open-ended corridors and associated stairways andramps where the corridor and stairway is not separated.

6.6.10.2 Exterior corridors that are 50 percent open shall not be required to be protected.

A.6.6.10.2 An example of an exterior corridor that is fifty percent open is shown in Figure A.6.6.10.2.

Additional Proposed Changes

File Name Description Approved

Figure_A.6.6.10.2.PNG Figure A.6.6.10.2

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

The 2015 IBC has added section 903.3.1.2.2 which requires sprinklers in open ended corridors and associated stairways that are not separated. This requirement has been included in 1027.6 but the ICC felt it needed to flag the requirement in the NFPA 13R section. As this committee did with the sprinklers on porches in buildings of Type 5 construction, it should align with what is found in the IBC.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 26-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. 6.6.5 [Excluding any Sub-Sections]]

Public Input No. 28-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. 6.6.7]

Public Input No. 29-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. A.6.6.5]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Feb 25 13:40:28 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

58 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 203 of 298

Page 209: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Page 204 of 298

Page 210: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 56-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 6.7.2.1 ]

6.7.2.1.1

Piping shall be permitted to be exposed to temperatures less than 40° F (4° C) when in accordance with5.4.4.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

This is a pointer to 5.4.4 so it will not be overlooked when applying 6.7.2.1.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu May 26 14:36:15 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

59 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 205 of 298

Page 211: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 6-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 6.8.7 ]

6.8.8

In multistory buildings, a control valve per floor shall not be required.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Currently 6.16.4 indicates that zoning per floor is not required. However, that is for buildings with alarm systems. Buildings without alarm systems should not be required to be isolated per floor.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jan 06 15:16:50 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

60 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 206 of 298

Page 212: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 34-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 6.8.8 ]

6.8.9*

Each connection from a standpipe that is part of a combined system to a sprinkler system or floor shall havean individual control valve and check valve.

A.6.8.9

When a standpipe is installed in a building and where the sprinkler system is connected to it, a control andcheck valve needs to be provided. This connection could occur just once or sometimes the owner maydesire a connection per floor.

ADD Figure A.8.17.5.2.2 (a) and (b) from NFPA 13 and renumber

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

This language is found in NFPA 13 & 14. The rules should be in NFPA 13R as well.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Mar 02 14:27:04 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

61 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 207 of 298

Page 213: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 57-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 6.8.8 ]

6.8.9 Multiple Occupancies

Control valve arrangements in mixed occupancy buildings with a residential occupancy shall be inaccordance with 6.8.9.

6.8.9.1

In podium/pedestal buildings, the system(s) below the podium/pedestal shall have a separate control valve.

6.8.9.2*

In buildings that are not a podium/pedestal where there are mixed occupancy/occupancies and NFPA 13 isused for the non-residential occupancy/occupancies, a single control valve shall be permitted for the entirebuilding.

A.6.8.9.2

NFPA 13 requires a separate sprinkler system per floor in multi-story buildings meeting certainrequirements. It should not be necessary to follow these rules where there are mixed occupancies and theuse of NFPA 13 & NFPA 13R systems.

6.8.9.3*

In buildings with mixed occupancies and the non-residential occupancy is mercantile, it shall have aseparate control valve.

A.8.9.3

Many mercantile spaces require modifications as tenants move in and out. The addition control requirementis to prevent the residential portion from being shut down during modifications.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Since the committee has made it clear that differing sprinkler systems can exist in a building with residential occupancies, there needs to be some rules as how to arrange the control valves.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu May 26 15:11:19 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

62 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 208 of 298

Page 214: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 58-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 6.9.1 ]

6.9.1.1

The drain shall be permitted to be located anywhere in the system provided it is connected to main pipingas large as the riser.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Provides guidance that a drain can be in a location other than the riser.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu May 26 15:28:05 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

63 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 209 of 298

Page 215: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 12-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 6.10.3 ]

6.10.3

The test connection shall be permitted to be located at any point on the system side of the alarm flowdevice.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

This clarifies that the test connection can be located at any point downstream of the flow switch or pressure switch.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Feb 05 13:39:50 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

64 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 210 of 298

Page 216: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 13-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 6.10.4 ]

6.9.5

On dry systems, the test connection shall be located at the end of the most remote branch line.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

This clarifies that the inspectors test on a dry system in an NFPA 13R system shall be located at the most remote point.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Feb 05 13:45:25 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

65 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 211 of 298

Page 217: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 59-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 6.11.5 ]

6.11.6

In buildings with mixed occupancies where the non residential occupancy/occupancies is protected with anNFPA 13 system, a single fire department connection in accordance with NFPA 13 shall be permitted.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Since the committee has indicate that a building can have both NFPA 13 and 13R systems in the same building, guidance is needed in regards to FDC arrangement and sizing.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu May 26 15:54:32 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

66 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 212 of 298

Page 218: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 88-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 6.13 ]

6.13.1

Where non-metallic pipe is used with listing limitations that do not include piping support requirements, thepipe shall be supported from structural members using support methods comparable to those required byapplicable local plumbing codes.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

This language would be necessary if prior public inputs 5.1.3.1, 5.2.1.4, and 5.2.9.1 are added.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 85-NFPA 13R-2016 [New Section after 5.1.3]

Public Input No. 86-NFPA 13R-2016 [New Section after 5.2.1.3]

Public Input No. 87-NFPA 13R-2016 [New Section after 5.2.9.3]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Melisa Rodriguez

Organization: Uponor

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 28 17:50:40 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

67 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 213 of 298

Page 219: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 33-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 6.16.4 ]

6.16.5

In buildings without a separate alarm system, annunciation by floor shall not be required.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

6.16.4 indicates that in buildings with an alarm system, annunciation by floor is not required. If there is no requirement for an alarm system and a local alarm only (Bell) is provided, there should not be a requirement to zone bells by floor.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Mar 02 14:17:07 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

68 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 214 of 298

Page 220: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 101-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Chapter 7 [Title Only] ]

Discharge Design Criteria

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

All subsections use "design." Putting this in the title of the chapter and deleting it from subsections simplifies the document and clarifies intent.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 102-NFPA 13R-2016 [Sections 7.1, 7.2, 7.3]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Jeffrey Shapiro

Organization: International Code Consultants

Affilliation: National Multifamily Housing Council

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 16:18:55 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

69 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 215 of 298

Page 221: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 102-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Sections 7.1, 7.2, 7.3 ]

Sections 7.1, 7.2, 7.3

7.1 Design Criteria — Inside Dwelling Unit.

7.1.1 Residential Sprinklers.

7.1.1.1*

The system shall provide at least the flow required to produce a minimum discharge density of 0.05 gpm/ft2

(2.04 mm/min) or the sprinkler listing, whichever is greater, to the design sprinklers.

7.1.1.2

Listed flows associated with testing under a smooth, flat, horizontal 8 ft (2.44 m) high ceiling shall bepermitted to be used for the ceiling configurations referenced in 7.1.1.3.1.

7.1.1.3* Number of Design Sprinklers.

7.1.1.3.1

For each of the following situations, the number of sprinklers in the design area shall be all of the sprinklerswithin a compartment, up to a maximum of four sprinklers, that require the greatest hydraulic demand:

(1) A flat, smooth, horizontal ceiling with no beams up to a maximum of 24 ft (7.3 m) above the floor.

(2) A flat, horizontal, beamed ceiling, with a maximum ceiling height of 24 ft (7.3 m), with beams up to14 in. (355 mm) deep with pendent sprinklers under the beams. The compartment containing the

beamed ceiling shall be a maximum of 600 ft2 (55 m2) in area. The highest sprinkler in thecompartment shall be above all openings from the compartment into any communicating spaces.

(3) A smooth, flat, sloped ceiling with no beams up to a maximum slope of 8 in 12. The highest portion ofthe ceiling shall not be more than 24 ft (7.3 m) above the floor. The highest sprinkler in the slopedportion of the ceiling shall be above all openings from the compartment containing the sloped ceilinginto any communicating spaces.

(4) A sloped ceiling with beams up to 14 in. (355 mm) deep with pendent sprinklers under the beams. The

compartment containing the sloped, beamed ceiling shall be a maximum of 600 ft2 (55 m2) in area.The slope of the ceiling shall be between 2 in 12 and 8 in 12. The highest portion of the ceiling shall notbe more than 24 ft (7.3 m) above the floor. The highest sprinkler in the sloped portion of the ceilingshall be above all openings from the compartment containing the sloped ceiling into anycommunicating spaces.

(5) A sloped ceiling with beams of any depth with sidewall or pendent sprinklers in each pocket formed by

the beams. The compartment containing the sloped, beamed ceiling shall be a maximum of 600 ft2

(55 m2) in area. The slope of the ceiling shall be between 2 in 12 and 8 in 12. The highest portion ofthe ceiling shall not be more than 24 ft (7.3 m) above the floor.

7.1.1.3.2

For situations not meeting one of the conditions in 7.1.1.3.1, residential sprinklers listed for use in specificceiling configurations shall be permitted to be used in accordance with their listing.

7.1.1.3.3*

For situations not meeting one of the conditions in 7.1.1.3.1 and 7.1.1.3.2, the number of sprinklers in thedesign area shall be determined in consultation with the authority having jurisdiction as appropriate for theconditions.

7.1.2 Quick-Response Sprinklers.

Where quick-response sprinklers are used in accordance with 6.2.1.3, the discharge and design arearequirements of NFPA 13 shall apply.

7.2* Design Criteria — Outside Dwelling Unit.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

70 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 216 of 298

Page 222: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

7.2.1

Areas outside the dwelling unit shall comply with Section 7.2.

7.2.2

The number of design sprinklers for a corridor or breezeway outside the dwelling unit shall include up to thefour most hydraulically demanding adjacent sprinklers.

7.2.3

The design discharge and design area criteria for areas protected by quick-response sprinklers shallcomply with NFPA 13 except as allowed by 7.2.3.1.

7.2.3.1

For compartments 500 ft2 (46 m2) or less that meet all of the following conditions and are protected withquick-response sprinklers, the design area shall be permitted to be limited to the number of sprinklers in thecompartment but shall not exceed four sprinklers:

(1) The area is protected with 30 minute–rated construction.

(2) The sprinklers are spaced at 225 ft2 (20.9 m2) maximum for light hazard, 130 ft2 (12 m2) maximumfor ordinary hazard, or in accordance with their listing.

(3) Openings have a lintel depth at least 8 in. (203 mm) in depth.

(4) The total area of openings, excluding any overhead doors that open to the exterior, does not exceed

50 ft2 (4.6 m2) for each compartment.

(5) Discharge densities are in accordance with NFPA 13.

7.2.4

Where residential sprinklers are used outside the dwelling unit as allowed by 6.2.2.2, the discharge criteriashall be in accordance with Section 7.1, except as modified by 7.2.4.1.

7.2.4.1

Residential sprinklers shall be permitted to be used in ordinary hazard areas that meet the followingconditions:

(1) The area is compartmented into 500 ft2 (46 m2) or less by 30-minute fire-rated construction.

(2) The sprinklers are spaced at 130 ft2 (12 m2) per sprinkler.

(3) Openings have a lintel at least 8 in. (203 mm) in depth.

(4) The total area of openings, excluding any overhead garage doors that open to the exterior, does not

exceed 50 ft2 (4.6 m2) for each compartment.

(5) Discharge densities are in accordance with NFPA 13 for ordinary hazard.

7.2.5

The number of design sprinklers for a corridor or breezeway outside the dwelling unit shall include up to thefour most hydraulically demanding adjacent sprinklers.

7.3 Design Criteria — Garages.

7.3.1

Garages that are completely separated from the residential portion of the building by fire-resistiveconstruction sufficient to have them considered separate buildings under the local code shall be protectedin accordance with NFPA 13.

7.3.2

Garages that are accessible by people from more than one dwelling unit, and are not covered by 7.3.1,shall be considered part of the building and shall be protected in accordance with Section 7.2.

7.3.2.1

Garage doors shall not be considered obstructions and shall be permitted to be ignored for placement andcalculation of sprinklers.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

71 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 217 of 298

Page 223: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

7.3.3*

Garages that are accessible only from a single dwelling unit shall be considered as part of that dwellingunit.

7.3.3.1

Garages that meet the criteria of 7.3.3 shall be protected in accordance with one of the following:

(1) Use of a residential sprinkler in accordance with Section 7.1

(2) Use of an extended coverage sprinkler discharging water not less than its listed flow rate for lighthazard

(3) Quick-response spray sprinkler at light hazard spacing in accordance with NFPA 13 designed to

discharge at 0.05 gpm/ft2 (2.04 mm/min) density

7.3.3.2

The system demand shall be permitted to be limited to the number of sprinklers in the compartment butshall not exceed four sprinklers.

7.3.3.3

Garage doors shall not be considered obstructions and shall be permitted to be ignored for placement andcalculation of sprinklers.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Coordination with Chapter 7 title change

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 101-NFPA 13R-2016 [Chapter 7 [Title Only]]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Jeffrey Shapiro

Organization: International Code Consultants

Affilliation: National Multifamily Housing Council

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 16:23:55 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

72 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 218 of 298

Page 224: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 24-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 7.2.5 ]

7.2.6

The number of design sprinklers for a building service chute shall include up to the three most hydraulicallydemanding adjacent sprinklers in the chute.

7.2.6.1

Each sprinkler shall discharge a minimum of 15 gpm (57 L/min).

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Chapter 6 does not exempt building service chutes. This language specifies design criteria when chute sprinklers are installed.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Feb 24 15:54:02 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

73 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 219 of 298

Page 225: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 64-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 7.3.2 ]

7.3.2.1

Private garages 1000 ft² (93 m²) and smaller shall be permitted to be protected with residential sprinklers.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

A garage accessible from a single dwelling unit or from a shared hallway are no different. They are generally one or two car garages and the makeup of what is put in that garage is the same regardless of how it is accessed.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 02 13:37:24 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

74 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 220 of 298

Page 226: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 63-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 7.3.2 ]

7.3.2

Garages that are accessible by people from more than one dwelling unit, and are not covered by 7.3.1,shall be considered part of the building and shall be protected in accordance with Section 7.2.

7.3.2.1

Garage doors shall not be considered obstructions and shall be permitted to be ignored for placement andcalculation of sprinklers.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

This is an installation requirement and it belongs in Chapter 6.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 02 13:34:41 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

75 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 221 of 298

Page 227: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 65-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 7.3.3.3 ]

7.3.3.3

Garage doors shall not be considered obstructions and shall be permitted to be ignored for placement andcalculation of sprinklers.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

This language belongs in the installation chapter

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 02 13:42:29 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

76 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 222 of 298

Page 228: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 103-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 7.4 ]

7.4 Attics

7.4.1 Occupied Attics and Attics Used for Storage. Attics that are intended for occupancy or storageshall comply with Section 7.1, where the attic is part of the dwelling unit, or Section 7.2, where the attic isoutside of the dwelling unit. Sprinkler temperature ratings shall comply with Section 6.2.3.

7.4.2 Fuel Fired Equipment. Where fuel-fired equipment is installed in an attic that is not otherwiserequired to have sprinklers, at least one quick-response intermediate temperature sprinkler shall beinstalled above the equipment.

7.4.3* Other Attics. Attics that are not required by Section 7.4.1 to have sprinklers shall bepermitted to have protection in accordance with one of the following. Sprinkler temperature ratingsshall comply with Section 6.2.3.

1. Protection complying with NFPA 13.

2. Protection using sprinklers that are specifically listed to provide attic protection inresidential occupancies using a discharge density of not less than 0.05 gpm/ft2 (2.04mm/min) and a design area of not less than 4 sprinklers.

A.7.4.2 NFPA 13R does not require installation of sprinklers in attics that are not intended for occupancyor storage. However, model building codes sometimes require protection of attics in tall, combustible-framed residential occupancies that are otherwise allowed to follow NFPA 13R. Such protection ispermitted to be provided by sprinklers or other means allowed by the model building code or NFPA 13, asspecified for protection of combustible concealed spaces. Common methods of protection in lieu ofsprinklers include filling the space with non-combustible insulation, using fire-retardant treated wood, orusing non-combustible materials. Even though sprinklers are not mandatory for attic protection underNFPA 13R, NFPA 13R offers appropriate design requirements for cases where sprinklers are provided andsets design benchmarks that parallel what is permitted for garages.

Renumber existing 7.4 as 7.5

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Section 6.6.6 and 6.6.6.1 require sprinklers in attics that are intended for living or storage purposes and for attics that contain fuel-fired equipment, and it is helpful to provide guidance on attic protection in Chapter 7 to correlate. In addition, model building codes are adding requirements for some other attics to be protected with sprinklers or other acceptable means for protection of concealed spaces. It is important for NFPA 13R to provide guidance on protection of attics for these situations as well. The proposal parallels the design guidance for garages by offering an option to use not less than a 0.05 gpm/sqft density and not less than a 4 sprinkler design basis. However, the minimum density and minimum number of sprinklers would have to be determined based on testing and a listing for this specific hazard, as validated by a listing agency. The second design option is necessary to state in NFPA 13R to provide an alternative to the general provisions in Section 6.6.8, which would otherwise require compliance with NFPA 13 as the only basis for attic sprinkler protection.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 104-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. A.6.6.6]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Jeffrey Shapiro

Organization: International Code Consultants

Affilliation: National Multifamily Housing Council

Street Address:

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

77 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 223 of 298

Page 229: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 16:27:27 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

78 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 224 of 298

Page 230: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 62-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 7.4 ]

7.4 Combustible Concealed Spaces.

Where unsprinklered combustible concealed spaces are present in a building residential occupancy , the

design area shall not be required to be increased to 3000 ft2 (279 m2) or any other value due to theexistence of the unsprinklered concealed spaces, regardless of the type of sprinklers used and whether thearea is inside or outside of a dwelling unit.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

The reference to building should be occupancy.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Jun 02 13:32:02 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

79 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 225 of 298

Page 231: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 16-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 8.1.7 ]

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

80 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 226 of 298

Page 232: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

8.1.7

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

81 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 227 of 298

Page 233: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Working plans shall be drawn to an indicated scale, on sheets of uniform size, with a plan of each floor, andshall show those items from the following list that pertain to the design of the system:

(1) Project name

(2) Location, including street address

(3) Point of compass

(4) Ceiling construction

(5) Full height cross-section or schematic diagram, including structural member information if required forclarity and including ceiling construction and method of protection for nonmetallic piping

(6) Ceiling/roof height and slopes not shown in the full height cross section

(7) Location of partitions and fire walls

(8) Location and size of concealed spaces, attics, closets, and bathrooms

(9) Any small enclosures in which no sprinklers are to be installed

(10) Size of the city main in the street and the city main test results including elevation of the test hydrant

(11) Make, manufacturer, type, temperature rating, sprinkler identification number, and nominal k-factor ofthe sprinkler

(12) Type and location of high-temperature sprinklers

(13) Number of sprinklers on each riser, per floor

(14) Type and location of alarm bells

(15) Type of pipe and fittings

(16) Pipe type and schedule of wall thickness

(17) Type of protection for nonmetallic pipe

(18) Location and size of riser nipples

(19) Types of fittings and joints and the locations of all welds and bends

(20) Types and locations of hangers, sleeves, and braces, and methods of securing sprinklers, whereapplicable

(21) All control valves, check valves, drain pipes, and test connections

(22) Underground pipe size, length, location, weight, material, and point of connection to the city main; typeof valves, meters, and valve pits; and depth at which the top of the pipe is laid below grade

(23) Name and address of the contractor

(24) Nominal pipe size and lengths

(25) Where the equipment is to be installed as an addition to an existing system, enough of the existingsystem indicated on the plans to make all conditions clear

(26) A graphic representation of the scale used on all plans

(27) Hydraulic reference points shown on the plan that correspond with comparable reference points on thehydraulic calculation sheets

(28) The minimum rate of water application and the design area of water application

(29) The total quantity of water and the pressure required noted at a common reference point for eachsystem

(30) Relative elevations of sprinklers, junction points, and supply or reference points

(31) Information about backflow preventers (manufacturer, size, type)

(32) Information about antifreeze solution used (type and amount)

(33) Size and location of hydrants, showing size and number of outlets; static and residual hydrants thatwere used in flow tests shall be shown

(34) Size, location, and piping arrangement of fire department connections

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

82 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 228 of 298

Page 234: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

(35) Location of fuel-fired equipment and heating and air-conditioning equipment

(36) Location of closets on exterior balconies, and any doors or penetration between the closet and thedwelling unit

(37) Edition year of NFPA 13R to which the sprinkler system is designed

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Ceiling construction is found in the full height cross section. This change mirrors NFPA 13

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Feb 05 14:04:58 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

83 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 229 of 298

Page 235: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 17-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 8.1.7 ]

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

84 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 230 of 298

Page 236: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

8.1.7

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

85 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 231 of 298

Page 237: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Working plans shall be drawn to an indicated scale, on sheets of uniform size, with a plan of each floor, andshall show those items from the following list that pertain to the design of the system:

(1) Project name

(2) Location, including street address

(3) Point of compass

(4) Ceiling construction

(5) Full height cross-section or schematic diagram, including structural member information if required forclarity and including ceiling construction and method of protection for nonmetallic piping

(6) Ceiling/roof height and slopes not shown in the full height cross section

(7) Location of partitions and fire walls

(8) Location and size of concealed spaces, attics, closets, and bathrooms

(9) Area per Floor

(10) Any small enclosures in which no sprinklers are to be installed

(11) Size of the city main in the street and the city main test results including elevation of the test hydrant

(12) Make, manufacturer, type, temperature rating, sprinkler identification number, and nominal k-factor ofthe sprinkler

(13) Type and location of high-temperature sprinklers

(14) Number of sprinklers on each riser, per floor

(15) Type and location of alarm bells

(16) Type of pipe and fittings

(17) Pipe type and schedule of wall thickness

(18) Type of protection for nonmetallic pipe

(19) Location and size of riser nipples

(20) Types of fittings and joints and the locations of all welds and bends

(21) Types and locations of hangers, sleeves, and braces, and methods of securing sprinklers, whereapplicable

(22) All control valves, check valves, drain pipes, and test connections

(23) Underground pipe size, length, location, weight, material, and point of connection to the city main; typeof valves, meters, and valve pits; and depth at which the top of the pipe is laid below grade

(24) Name and address of the contractor

(25) Nominal pipe size and lengths

(26) Where the equipment is to be installed as an addition to an existing system, enough of the existingsystem indicated on the plans to make all conditions clear

(27) A graphic representation of the scale used on all plans

(28) Hydraulic reference points shown on the plan that correspond with comparable reference points on thehydraulic calculation sheets

(29) The minimum rate of water application and the design area of water application

(30) The total quantity of water and the pressure required noted at a common reference point for eachsystem

(31) Relative elevations of sprinklers, junction points, and supply or reference points

(32) Information about backflow preventers (manufacturer, size, type)

(33) Information about antifreeze solution used (type and amount)

(34) Size and location of hydrants, showing size and number of outlets; static and residual hydrants thatwere used in flow tests shall be shown

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

86 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 232 of 298

Page 238: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

(35) Size, location, and piping arrangement of fire department connections

(36) Location of fuel-fired equipment and heating and air-conditioning equipment

(37) Location of closets on exterior balconies, and any doors or penetration between the closet and thedwelling unit

(38) Edition year of NFPA 13R to which the sprinkler system is designed

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Area per floor should be indicated to help determine how many system(s) are needed.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Feb 05 14:09:28 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

87 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 233 of 298

Page 239: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 97-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 8.1.7 ]

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

88 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 234 of 298

Page 240: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

8.1.7

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

89 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 235 of 298

Page 241: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Working plans shall be drawn to an indicated scale, on sheets of uniform size, with a plan of each floor, andshall show those items from the following list that pertain to the design of the system:

(1) Project name

(2) Location, including street address

(3) Point of compass

(4) Ceiling construction

(5) Full height cross-section or schematic diagram, including structural member information if required forclarity and including ceiling construction and method of protection for nonmetallic piping

(6) Ceiling/roof height and slopes not shown in the full height cross section

(7) Location of partitions and fire walls

(8) Location of lintels, and doorways. Lintel openings require a cross section view to indicate the areaof the opening

(9) Location and size of concealed spaces, attics, closets, and bathrooms

(10) Occupancy label and name of all areas or rooms

(11) Any small enclosures in which no sprinklers are to be installed

(12) Size of the city main in the street and the city main test results including elevation of the test hydrant

(13) Make, manufacturer, type, temperature rating, sprinkler identification number, and nominal k-factor ofthe sprinkler

(14) Type and location of high-temperature sprinklers

(15) Number of sprinklers on each riser, per floor

(16) Type and location of alarm bells/horn/strobes

(17) Type of pipe and fittings

(18) Pipe type and schedule of wall thickness

(19) Type of protection for nonmetallic pipe

(20) Location and size of riser nipples

(21) Types of fittings and joints and the locations of all welds and bends

(22) Types and locations of hangers, sleeves, and braces, and methods of securing sprinklers, whereapplicable

(23) All control valves, check valves, drain pipes, and test connections

(24) Underground pipe size, length, location, weight, material, and point of connection to the city main; typeof valves, meters, and valve pits; and depth at which the top of the pipe is laid below grade

(25) Name and , address, phone number and email address of the contractor

(26) Nominal pipe size and lengths

(27) Where the equipment is to be installed as an addition to an existing system, enough of the existingsystem indicated on the plans to make all conditions clear

(28) A graphic representation of the scale used on all plans

(29) Hydraulic reference points shown on the plan that correspond with comparable reference points on thehydraulic calculation sheets

(30) The minimum rate of water application and the design area of water application

(31) The total quantity of water and the pressure required noted at a common reference point for eachsystem

(32) Relative elevations of sprinklers, junction points, and supply or reference points

(33) Information about backflow preventers (manufacturer, size, type)

(34) Information about antifreeze solution used (type and amount)

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

90 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 236 of 298

Page 242: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

(35) Size and location of hydrants, showing size and number of outlets; static and residual hydrants thatwere used in flow tests shall be shown

(36) Size, location, and piping arrangement of fire department connections

(37) Location of fuel-fired equipment and heating and air-conditioning equipment

(38) Location of closets on exterior balconies, and any doors or penetration between the closet and thedwelling unit

(39) Edition year of NFPA 13R to which the sprinkler system is designed

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Contractor contact information and clarifications to aid plan review and inspection.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Lynn Nielson

Organization: City Of Henderson

Affilliation: Self

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 13:44:59 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

91 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 237 of 298

Page 243: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 32-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Chapter 9 ]

Chapter 9 Water Supply

9.1 Automatic.

Every sprinkler system shall have at least one automatic water supply.

9.2 Minimum.

The water supply shall be capable of supplying the system demand for at least 30 minutes. (See 7.1.1.3.)

9.3* Source.

The water supply source shall be one of the following:

(1)

(2) An elevated tank

(3) A pressure tank installed in accordance with NFPA 13 and NFPA 22

(4)

9.4 Fire Pump.

Where a fire pump is installed, the fire pump shall be installed in accordance with NFPA 20.

9.5 Water Tanks.

Where a water tank is installed, the water tank shall be installed in accordance with NFPA 22.

9.6* Domestic Demand.

Domestic demand for the building being calculated shall be included as part of the overall system demandfor systems with common domestic/fire mains where no provisions are made to prevent the domesticwaterflow upon sprinkler system activation.

9.7 Non–Fire Protection Connections.

Sprinkler systems with non–fire protection connections shall not be permitted.

Additional Proposed Changes

File Name Description Approved

Chapter_9_Water_Supply.docx Chapter 9 rewrite

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

This chapter needed some rework. I tried to make it more parallel NFPA 13 in regards to water supplies. Domestic demand is required to be calculated but there were never defined values to use (only annex). This input brings those tables into the body of the standard. The annex language was cleaned up because it implied that a fire pump could supply both domestic and fire. The new a.9.5.1 clarifies when a pump can supply both.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

* A connection to a reliable waterworks system with or without a pump, as required

* A stored water source with an automatically operated fire pump

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

92 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 238 of 298

Page 244: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Chapter 9 Water Supplyies 9.1 Number of Supplies. Automatic. Every automatic sprinkler system shall have at least one automatic water supply. 9.2 Minimum.  Capacity. Water supplies shall be capable of providing the required flow and pressure for all design areas determined using the requirements of Chapter 7 and the hydraulic procedures located in NFPA 13. 9.2.1 The water supply shall be capable of supplying the system demand for at least 30 minutes. (See 7.1.1.3.) 9.36* Domestic Demand.  9.3.1 Domestic demand for the building being calculated shall be included as part of the overall system demand for systems with common domestic/fire mains. 9.3.2 wWhere no provisions are made to prevent the domestic waterflow upon sprinkler system activation, domestic demand shall not be required to be calculated. 9.3.3 Domestic demand shall be based upon Table 9.3.3(a) and Table 9.3.3(b). 9.3.3.1 Interpolation of Table 9.3.3(b) shall be allowed when calculating domestic demand. 9.3.4 Where more demanding domestic demands are specified, they shall be used. 9.3.5 Domestic demand shall be added to the hydraulic calculations at the point the piping becomes combined or common.   Table A.9.69.3.3(a) Fixture Load Values Facility Type Unit Private Facilities (those within individual dwelling units) Bathroom group with flush tank (including 6 lavatory, water closet, and bathtub with shower) Bathroom group with flush valve 8 Bathtub 2 Dishwasher 1 Kitchen sink 2 Laundry trays 3 Lavatory 1 Shower stall 2 Washing machine 2 Water closet with flush valve 6 Water closet with flush tank 3 Public Facilities Bathtub 4 Drinking fountain 0 Kitchen sink 4 Lavatory 2 Service sink 3 Shower head 4 Urinal with 1 in. (25 mm) flush valve 10 Urinal with 3⁄4 in. (20 mm) flush valve 5 Urinal with flush tank 3 Washing machine [8 lb (3.63 kg)] 3 Washing machine [16 lb (7.26 kg)] 4 Water closet with flush valve 10 Water closet with flush tank 5

   

Page 239 of 298

Page 245: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

 Table A.9.69.3.3(b) Total Estimated Domestic Demand Total Demand For Systems For Systems Total Fixture with Predominately with Predominately Load Units Flush Tanks Flush Valves [from Table A.9.69.3.3(a)] gpm L/min gpm L/min 1 3 11.5 — — 2 5 19 — — 5 10 38 15 57 10 15 57 25 95 20 20 76 35 130 35 25 95 45 170 50 30 115 50 190 70 35 130 60 225 100 45 170 70 265 150 55 210 80 305 200 65 245 90 340 250 75 285 100 380 350 100 380 125 475 500 125 475 150 570 750 175 660 175 660 1000 200 755 200 755 1500 275 1040 275 1040 2000 325 1230 325 1230 3500 500 1900 500 1900

9.4 Connection from Waterworks System 9.4.1 The requirements of the public health authority having jurisdiction shall be determined and followed. 9.4.2* Where equipment is installed to guard against possible contamination of the public water system, such equipment and devices shall be listed for fire protection service.  9.5 Types 9.5.1* Water supplies for sprinkler systems shall be one of the following or any combination thereof:  

(1) A connection to an approved public or private waterworks system in accordance with 9.6. (2) A connection including a fire pump in accordance with 9.7. (3) A connection to a water storage tank at grade or below grade in accordance with NFPA 22 and 

filled from an approved source. (4) A connection to a pressure tank in accordance with NFPA 13 and NFPA 22 and filled from an 

approved source. (5) A connection to a gravity tank in accordance with NFPA 22 and filled from an approved source. (6) A penstock, flume, river, lake, pond or reservoir in accordance with 9.8. (7) A source of recycled or reclaimed water where the building owner (or their agent) has analyzed 

the source of the water and the treatment process (if any) that the water undergoes before being made available to the sprinkler system and determined that any materials, chemicals, or contaminants in the water will not be detrimental to the components of the sprinkler system it comes in contact with. 

 

Page 240 of 298

Page 246: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

 9.6 Connections to Waterworks Systems. 9.6.1 A connection to a reliable waterworks system shall be an acceptable water supply source. 9.6.2 The volume and pressure of a public or private water supply shall be determined from waterflow test data or other approved method. 9.6.2.1 Where a waterflow test is used for the purposes of system design. The test shall be conducted no more than 12 months prior to working plan submittal unless otherwise approved by the authority having jurisdiction.    9.3* Source. The water supply source shall be one of the following: (1)*A connection to a reliable waterworks system with or without a pump, as required (2) An elevated tank (3) A pressure tank installed in accordance with NFPA 13 and NFPA 22 (4)*A stored water source with an automatically operated fire pump  9.79.4 Fire Pump. A single automatically controlled fire pump in accordance with NFPA 20 shall be an acceptable water supply source. Where a fire pump is installed, the fire pump shall be installed in accordance with NFPA 20.  9.5 Water Tanks. Where a water tank is installed, the water tank shall be installed in accordance with NFPA 22. 9.6* Domestic Demand. Domestic demand for the building being calculated shall be included as part of the overall system demand for systems with common domestic/fire mains where no provisions are made to prevent the domestic waterflow upon sprinkler system activation.  9.8 Penstocks, flumes, Rivers, or Lakes. Water supply connections from penstocks, flumes, rivers, lakes or reservoirs shall be arranged to avoid mud and sediment and shall be provided with approved double removable screens or approved strainers installed in an approved manner.  9.97 Non–Fire Protection Connections. Sprinkler systems with non–fire protection connections shall not be permitted. 

A.9.4.23 The connection to city mains for fire protection is often subject to local regulation of metering and backflow prevention requirements. Where connections are made from public waterworks systems, such systems should be guarded against possible contamination as follows (see AWWA M14, Recommended Practice for Backflow Prevention and Cross Connection Control).   A.9.5.1 Preferred and acceptable water supply arrangements are shown in Figure A.9.5.13(a), Figure A.9.9.13(b), and Figure A.9.5.13(c). Where it is necessary to use a meter between the city water main and the sprinkler system supply, an acceptable arrangement as shown in Figure A.9.5.13(c) can be used. Under these circumstances, the flow characteristics of the meter are to be included in the hydraulic calculation of the system. Where a tank is used for both domestic and fire protection purposes, a low water alarm that actuates when the water level falls below 110 percent of the minimum quantity specified in Section 9.2 should be provided. A.9.3(1) Pumps that are owned and operated by thea public or private waterworks utility are not required to meet NFPA 20 because the waterworks industry standards for reliability and redundancy take care of concerns regarding reliability for fire‐fighting operations. If there is any concern over the 

Page 241 of 298

Page 247: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

use of these non NFPA 20 pump installations, then the waterworks would not be considered reliable and would not be permitted as a water supply. An authority having jurisdiction has the authority to review a combined domestic/fire protection pump arrangement and determine whether or not the reliability and redundancy meets the intent of NFPA 20, even if the exact arrangement of equipment does not meet the rules of NFPA 20.   INSERT FIGURES A.9.3(a), A.9.3(b), and A.9.3(c) and rename as A.9.5.1(a), A.9.5.1(b), and A.9.5.1(c)   Private pumps taking suction from the waterworks system need to comply with NFPA20, even if they supply both fire protection and domestic water uses, unless they comply with the same waterworks industry standards for reliability and redundancy as the pumps owned by a waterworks utility.  A.9.3(4) Pumps taking water from a stored source need to meet NFPA 20 requirements, even when they supply both fire protection and domestic water uses, unless they comply with waterworks industry standards for reliability and redundancy. An authority having jurisdiction has the authority to review a combined domestic/fire protection pump arrangement and determine whether or not the reliability and redundancy meets the intent of NFPA 20, even if the exact arrangement of equipment does not meet the rules of NFPA 20.  A.9.6 Table A.9.6(a) and Table A.9.6(b) can be used to determine a domestic design demand. Using Table A.9.6(a), the total number of water supply fixture units downstream of any point in the piping serving both sprinkler and domestic needs is determined. Using Table A.9.6(b), the appropriate total flow allowance is determined and added to the sprinkler demand at the total pressure required for the sprinkler system at that point.  

Page 242 of 298

Page 248: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Submittal Date: Wed Mar 02 14:07:24 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

93 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 243 of 298

Page 249: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 35-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 9.3 ]

9.3.1

The flow and pressure of a public water supply shall be determined from waterflow test data or otherapproved method.

9.3.1.1 Water supply fluctuations must be addressed in the design of sprinkler systems, as required by theAuthority Having Jurisdiction.

9.3.1.2 Safety factors must be addressed in the design of sprinkler systems, as required by the AuthorityHaving Jurisdiction.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

The intent of this proposal is to recognize the need for evaluation of water supply fluctuations and safety factors in system design.

The International Codes now specifically require that water supply fluctuations be addressed in sprinkler system design as follows (from 2015 IFC, Section 903.3.5):"For connections to public waterworks systems, the water supply test used for design of fire protection systems shall be adjusted to account for seasonal and daily pressure fluctuations based on information from the water supply authority and as approved by the firecode official."

Additionally, NFPA 14 (2016 edition) now states: "10.1.1 Daily and seasonal flow and pressure fluctuation data shall be provided by the water purveyor, and the fire protection design must account for both high and low variations.10.1.1.1 Where these data are not available, design shall be based on the available water flow data."

This proposal is simply an intent to recognize the need for and importance of water supply fluctuation to be evaluated, as well as to recognize that many jurisdictions require safety factors in the design of sprinkler systems. There is an additional similar proposal to NFPA 13 in this regard to move the requirement to address pressure fluctuations back into the body of that standard, rather than just in the Appendix.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Bob Morgan

Organization: Fort Worth Fire Department

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Mar 24 16:17:16 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

94 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 244 of 298

Page 250: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 53-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 9.3 ]

9.4 Where a waterflow test was conducted to determine the strength of a water supply, the volumeand pressure available for use for a fire protection system shall be determined from either 9.4.1 or9.4.2.

9.4.1* Knowledge of the water supply and engineering judgment taking into account reasonabledaily and seasonal fluctuations not extreme conditions.

9.4.2* Use of the following formula:

P = The pressure available from the water supply to use for a fire protection system that willbe calculated for a given flow (Q)

Q = The flow that will be used to calculate the available pressure from the water supply.

P R = The residual pressure measured during the waterflow test while the flow Q R was

discharging from the water supply.

P S = The static pressure measured during the waterflow test.

Q R = The flow discharging from the water supply when P R was measured.

P L = The expected low static pressure at the location of the test results accounting for

daily and seasonal fluctuations (not extreme conditions) obtained from the water utility. Where the water authority does not provide P L , see 9.4.3.

9.4.3 Where the water authority does not provide a value for P L , the value of P L shall be

calculated from the following formula:

P L = P S – 10 psi

Additional Proposed Changes

File Name Description Approved

Safety_Margin_Proposal-NFPA_13R.docx

This provides the formula that I can't get into Terra View and shows the effect of the annex text as well.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

There needs to be a reasonable adjustment to water supply data in order to accommodate changes due to daily and seasonal fluctuations. The fact that this is currently not a requirement allows the design of fire protection systems that are known by the designer to have an ineffective water supply almost immediately after installation.

This proposal takes care of the traditional arguments against a mandated safety margin by creating a standardized method of calculating that safety margin; however, this standardized method is only used if there is no information regarding the water utility. So, those situations where the fluctuations in the water delivery are known at a particular location, then these take priority.

Spelling out the fact that NFPA 13R is not expecting unusual circumstances like water main breaks and 100 year droughts should help alleviate liability concerns on the part of the water utility, which should lead to a more open dialog between the fire protection professional and the water utility representative. The reality is that extreme conditions like 100 year droughts and water main breaks are better handled by the Impairment Procedures of NFPA 25.

One of the concerns about this proposal last cycle was that there was no way to account for the situation where the water utility brings more pumps on line as the flow demand increases. These situations produce a water

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

95 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 245 of 298

Page 251: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Water Supply Adjustment Proposals Put Together Insert new sections as follows: 9.4 Where a waterflow test was conducted to determine the strength of a water supply, the volume and pressure available for use for a fire protection system shall be determined from either 9.4.1 or 9.4.2. 9.4.1* Knowledge of the water supply and engineering judgment taking into account reasonable daily and seasonal fluctuations not extreme conditions. 9.4.2* Use of the following formula:

LR

SR PQ

QPPP

85.1

P = The pressure available from the water supply to use for a fire protection system that will be calculated for a given flow (Q) Q = The flow that will be used to calculate the available pressure from the water supply. PR = The residual pressure measured during the waterflow test while the flow QR was discharging from the water supply. PS = The static pressure measured during the waterflow test. QR = The flow discharging from the water supply when PR was measured. PL = The expected low static pressure at the location of the test results accounting for daily and seasonal fluctuations (not extreme conditions) obtained from the water utility. Where the water authority does not provide PL, see 9.4.3.

9.4.3 Where the water authority does not provide a value for PL, the value of PL shall be calculated from the following formula:

PL = PS – 10 psi A.5.1.2 An adjustment to the waterflow test data to account for the following should be made, as appropriate: (1) Daily and seasonal fluctuations (2) Possible interruption by flood or ice conditions (3) Large simultaneous industrial use (4) Future demand on the water supply system (5) Other conditions that could affect the water supply

Page 246 of 298

Page 252: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

A.9.4.1 The purpose of the adjustment is to take into account reasonable daily and seasonal variations in the water supply, which are easily predicted and tracked by a water utility. It is not the intent to use this section to account for unusual conditions such as 100 year droughts or water main breaks. These unusual conditions are handled through the Impairment Procedures of NFPA 25 and should not be considered when determining the ability of a water supply to meet the demand of a fire protection system under more normal circumstances. A.9.4.2 Consider the following example. A waterflow test is conducted at a location where a city water main is going to be tapped for a new sprinkler system. During the test, the static pressure is measured at 70 psi, the residual pressure is measured at 50 psi while 1300 gpm was discharging from a nearby hydrant. The water utility is contacted and they indicate that a reasonable low static pressure accounting for typical daily and seasonal fluctuations in this area is 55 psi. The equation that describes the water supply available for a fire sprinkler system would be:

551300

705085.1

QP

There are two ways to use this formula. One would be to assume two different values for Q, calculate P and then draw a graph on log 1.85 paper. Any fire sprinkler system demand falling on or below the line on this graph would be acceptable in accordance with NFPA 13 to work with this water supply. In this case, the two easiest flows to pick for Q would be 0 and 1300 gpm. When Q = 0, P is simply 55 psi. When Q = 1300 gpm, P = 35 psi. These two points can be plotted on log 1.85 paper as shown in Figure A.9.4.2. The second way to use this formula would be to calculate the fire protection system and determine the flow necessary to make the system work. Plug this flow into the formula above and see what the available pressure from the water supply will be at that flow. For example, if a sprinkler system connected to this water supply had a demand of 580 gpm, the available pressure from the water supply would be:

551300

5807050

85.1

P

P = (-20)(0.225) + 55

P = 50.5 psi

So, as long as the sprinkler system has a pressure demand less than or equal to 50.5 psi, it will work with this water supply.

Page 247 of 298

Page 253: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Figure A.9.4.2 Available Water Supply Curve for Example in Section A.9.4.2

Sprinkler system demand can be anywhere in shaded region

Page 248 of 298

Page 254: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

supply curve that looks more like a saw-tooth configuration than a line. That concern has been handled with the proposed language in the new section 9.4.1

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 54-NFPA 13R-2016 [New Section after A.9.3(4)]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Kenneth Isman

Organization: University of Maryland

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu May 26 12:28:44 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

96 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 249 of 298

Page 255: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 80-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 9.5 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

9.6

Water storage tanks outside the scope of NFPA 22 shall be permitted when approved by the authorityhaving jurisdiction.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

NFPA 22 does not address storage tanks for smaller amounts of water required for an NFPA 13R system. NFPA 22 does not permit plastic tanks such as those often used in 13D applications. Due to the increase in retrofitted systems in adult care "houses", we have found section 9.5 creates an unreasonable cost increase on small businesses by not allowing plastic tanks to be installed. The AHJ should be afforded the opportunity to approve plastic tanks in lieu of larger, more expensive tanks with unnecessarily higher capacities.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Jason Gill

Organization: Fire & Life Safety America

Affilliation: AFSA

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Jun 27 23:13:07 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

97 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 250 of 298

Page 256: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 22-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 9.6 ]

9.6.1

Domestic demand shall be based upon Table 9.6(a) and Table 9.6(b).

9.6.2

Where more demanding domestic demands are specified, they shall be used in the calculations.

9.6.3

Domestic demand shall be added to the calculations at the point the piping becomes combined or common.

9.6.4

Interpolation of Table 9.6(b) shall be allowed when calculating domestic demand.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Currently the standard provides a mandate to include domestic demand when there is common piping and/or supply. The guidance in the annex Tables are generally what is utilized. This should be the standard unless there is documented higher domestic water demand criteria.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sun Feb 14 17:37:52 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

98 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 251 of 298

Page 257: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 42-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 9.6 ]

9.6* Domestic Demand.

Domestic For systems with common domestic/fire mains serving more than one dwelling unit, domesticdemand for the building being calculated shall be included as part of the overall system demand forsystems with common domestic/fire mains where no unless provisions are made to prevent the domesticwaterflow upon sprinkler system activation.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Four story townhouses have become a popular type of dwelling unit being constructed in many areas, and the International Building Code requires such structures to have a sprinkler system installed in accordance with NFPA 13R in order to have the fourth story. For the most part, these sprinkler systems are not that different from NFPA 13D systems, other than the number of sprinklers calculated. The issue that arises is that the sprinkler supply is usually from a common supply line feeding the domestic water, and most public water authorities require the sprinkler connection to be on the 'downstream' side of the water meter. Even with a 1-inch water meter (which is the largest size that most water authorities will allow on a single-family dwelling), the domestic demand added to the four-sprinkler flow usually results in a total volume beyond the listed rating of the water meter. Historically, NFPA 13D has not required domestic water demand to be included in the sprinkler demand when the common domestic/fire main serves a single dwelling unit. The same philosophy should apply in the scenario of a four-story single-family dwelling.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Ivan Humberson

Organization: City Of Gaithersburg, Md.

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Apr 29 14:22:03 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

99 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 252 of 298

Page 258: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 20-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 10.1.2 ]

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

100 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 253 of 298

Page 259: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

10.1.2

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

101 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 254 of 298

Page 260: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

The installer shall complete the contractor's material and test certificate(s) as shown in Figure 10.1.2 priorto asking for approval of the installation.

Figure 10.1.2 Contractor's Material and Test Certificate for Aboveground Piping. [13:Figure 25.1]

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

102 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 255 of 298

Page 261: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Change the test certificate to state "Have copies of the following been provided to the owner or owner's representative". Currently it states Have copies of the following been left on the premises.Several AHJ's in South Florida have been requiring a copy of NFPA 25 to be left in each building on apartment complexes.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sun Feb 14 15:36:57 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

103 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 256 of 298

Page 262: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 89-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 10.2.2.1 ]

10.2.2.1

Systems, including pressure reduced portions of a system in accordance with 5.2.1.4 and 5.2.9.4, havingmore than 20 sprinklers or having a fire department connection shall pass a hydrostatic pressure testperformed for the aboveground piping system in accordance with NFPA 13.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

This language would be necessary if prior public inputs 5.1.3.1, 5.2.1.4, and 5.2.9.1 are added.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 85-NFPA 13R-2016 [New Section after 5.1.3]

Public Input No. 86-NFPA 13R-2016 [New Section after 5.2.1.3]

Public Input No. 87-NFPA 13R-2016 [New Section after 5.2.9.3]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Melisa Rodriguez

Organization: Uponor

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 28 18:01:39 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

104 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 257 of 298

Page 263: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 90-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 10.2.2.1 ]

10.2.2.1

Systems, including pressure reduced portions of a system in accordance with 5.2.1.4 and 5.2.9.4, havingmore than 20 sprinklers or having a fire department connection shall pass a hydrostatic pressure testperformed for the aboveground piping system in accordance with NFPA 13.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

This language would be necessary if prior public inputs 5.1.3.1, 5.2.1.4, and 5.2.9.1 are added.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 85-NFPA 13R-2016 [New Section after 5.1.3]

Public Input No. 86-NFPA 13R-2016 [New Section after 5.2.1.3]

Public Input No. 87-NFPA 13R-2016 [New Section after 5.2.9.3]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Melisa Rodriguez

Organization: Uponor

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 28 18:02:44 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

105 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 258 of 298

Page 264: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 55-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after 10.2.2.2 ]

Extract sections 25.5 and 25.6 from NFPA 13 (with the appropraite annex sections). The resultwould look as follows (if these sections are not changed in this cycle):

10.3 * Hydraulic Design Information Sign.

10.3 .1 The installing contractor shall identify a hydraulically designed sprinkler system with apermanently marked weatherproof metal or rigid plastic sign secured with corrosionresistant wire, chain,or other approved means. Such signs shall be placed at the alarm valve, dry pipe valve, preaction valve, or deluge valve supplying the corresponding hydraulically designed area.

10.3.2 The sign shall include the following information:

(1) Location of the design area or areas

(2) Discharge densities over the design area or areas

(3) Required flow and residual pressure demand at the base of the riser

(4) Occupancy classification or commodity classification and maximum permitted storage height andconfiguration

(5) Hose stream allowance included in addition to the sprinkler demand

(6) The name of the installing contractor

10.4* General Information Sign.

10.4.1 The installing contractor shall provide a general information sign used to determine system designbasis and information

relevant to the inspection, testing, and maintenance requirements required by NFPA 25.

10.4.1.1 Such general information shall be provided with a permanently marked weatherproof metal orrigid plastic sign, secured with corrosion-resistant wire, chain, or other acceptable means.

10.4.1.2 Such signs shall be placed at each system control riser, antifreeze loop, and auxiliary systemcontrol valve.

10.4.2 The sign shall include the following information:

(1) Name and location of the facility protected

(2) Occupancy classification

(3) Commodity classification

(4) Presence of high-piled and/or rack storage

(5) Maximum height of storage planned

(6) Aisle width planned

(7) Encapsulation of pallet loads

(8) Presence of solid shelving

(9) Flow test data

(10) Presence of flammable/combustible liquids

(11) Presence of hazardous materials

(12) Presence of other special storage

(13) Location of venting valve

(14) Location of auxiliary drains and low point drains on dry pipe and preaction systems

(15) Original results of main drain flow test

(16) Original results of dry pipe and double interlock preaction valve test

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

106 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 259 of 298

Page 265: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

(17) Name of installing contractor or designer

(18) Indication of presence and location of antifreeze or other auxiliary systems

(19) Where injection systems are installed to treat MIC or corrosion, the type of chemical, concentrationof the chemical, and where information can be found as to the proper disposal of the chemical

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

NFPA 13R systems need identification signs that spell out the assumptions in the design just like NFPA 13 systems. The signs are required by NFPA 25, so as soon as an NFPA 13R system starts being inspected, it is out of compliance without the signs, so NFPA 13R should be requiring the signs.

The material is proposed to be extracted from NFPA 13 so that it will be automatically identical. This way, if the NFPA 13 committee makes any changes, the NFPA 13R committee will not need to handle the situation. The extract can be updated automatically.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Kenneth Isman

Organization: University of Maryland

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu May 26 12:39:02 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

107 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 260 of 298

Page 266: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 74-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 11.1.1 ]

11.1.1*

A supply of at least six spare sprinklers shall be maintained on the premises so that any sprinklers thathave operated or been damaged in any way can be promptly replaced. The quantity of spare sprinklersmaintained shall be as specified in 11.1.5.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Section 11.1.5 specifies the various numbers of spare sprinklers required, based on the size of the system. Rather than state a minimum number, it would be cleaner to refer to the section that specifies how many are to be provided.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 75-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. 11.1.5]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Ivan Humberson

Organization: City Of Gaithersburg

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 21 11:01:38 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

108 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 261 of 298

Page 267: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 21-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 11.1.5 ]

11.1.5

The stock of spare sprinklers shall include all types and ratings installed and shall be as follows:

(1) For protected facilities buildings having under 300 sprinklers — no fewer than six sprinklers

(2) For protected facilities buildings having 300 to 1000 sprinklers — no fewer than 12 sprinklers

(3) For protected facilities protected buildings having over 1000 sprinklers — no fewer than 24 sprinklers

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

I believe the intent is that the spare sprinkler count is determined by building. One could assume that a 30 building apartment complex is a facility so only 24 spare sprinklers would be needed for a facility with possibly upwards of 5000 sprinklers

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sun Feb 14 16:21:39 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

109 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 262 of 298

Page 268: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 75-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. 11.1.5 ]

11.1.5

The stock of spare sprinklers shall include all types and ratings installed and shall be as follows:

(1) For systems serving a single-family dwelling - no fewer than two sprinklers

(2) For protected facilities having under 300 sprinklers — no fewer than six sprinklers

(3) For protected facilities having 300 to 1000 sprinklers — no fewer than 12 sprinklers

(4) For protected facilities having over 1000 sprinklers — no fewer than 24 sprinklers

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

It has become quite common to have four-story single-family dwellings and four-story townhomes, which the International Building Code requires sprinkler design in accordance with NFPA 13R in order to have the fourth story. It becomes extremely expensive and over-burdensome for each dwelling unit to have six spare sprinklers. From almost all aspects other than sprinkler hydraulic design, these dwellings are practically identical to homes protected by sprinkler systems designed by NFPA 13D, which requires no spare sprinklers. By minimizing the required number of spare sprinklers required for four-story single-family dwellings, the cost to the home buyers is thereby reduced.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 74-NFPA 13R-2016[Section No. 11.1.1]

Both amend requirements relating to number of sparesprinklers to be provided.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Ivan Humberson

Organization: City Of Gaithersburg

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 21 11:06:20 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

110 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 263 of 298

Page 269: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 38-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. A.1.1 ]

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

111 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 264 of 298

Page 270: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

A.1.1

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

112 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 265 of 298

Page 271: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

NFPA 13R is appropriate for use as an alternative to NFPA 13 only in those residential occupancies, asdefined in this standard, up to and including four aboveground stories in height. It should be noted thatmodel building codes contain special allowances for "pedestal" or "podium" style buildings , which permitthe story height for structures above the pedestal to be measured from the top surface of the pedestal,rather than from grade plane, and it is the intent of NFPA 13R to follow this model building code method fordetermining the number of stories. Accordingly, it is possible for a 4-story residential structure to be withinthe scope of NFPA 13R even when that structure is constructed on top of a 1-story pedestal. However,where this is allowed, model building codes will require the pedestal portion to be constructed using Type Iconstruction, and limited to buildings that are the pedestal portion will be required to be protected by anNFPA 13 compliant sprinkler system.

Regardless of whether a building does or does not involve a pedestal, NFPA 13R systems are alwayslimited to structures that do not exceed 60 ft (18 m) or less in height above grade plane, which is . Notethat model building codes do not allow building height to be measured from the top of a pedestal. That allowance only applies to determiming the number of stories. The 60-foot overall height limit isconsistent with limits established by model building codes for buildings of Type V construction. The heightof a building structure above grade plane is determined by model building codes, which base the height onthe average height of the highest roof surface above grade plane. For further information on the buildingheight story limits, see model building codes.

Buildings that contain multiple occupancies (either separated or non-separated), accessory occupancies orincidental uses are often subject to special rules that may restrict the use of NFPA 13R. Refer to theadopted building code to determine whether such restrictions are applicable.

The criteria in this standard are based on full-scale fire tests of rooms containing typical furnishings found inresidential living rooms, kitchens, and bedrooms. The furnishings were arranged as typically found indwelling units in a manner similar to that shown in Figure A.1.1(a) , Figure A.1.1(b) , and Figure A.1.1(c).Sixty full-scale fire tests were conducted in a two-story dwelling in Los Angeles, California, and 16 testswere conducted in a 14 ft (4.3 m) wide mobile home in Charlotte, North Carolina. Sprinkler systemsdesigned and installed according to this standard are expected to prevent flashover within the compartmentof origin where sprinklers are installed in the compartment. A sprinkler system designed and installedaccording to this standard cannot, however, be expected to completely control a fire involving fuel loads

that are significantly higher than average for dwelling units [10 lb/ft2 (49 kg/m2)], configurations of fuelsother than those with typical residential occupancies, or conditions where the interior finish has anunusually high flame spread index (greater than 225).

To be effective, sprinkler systems installed in accordance with this standard need to open the sprinklersclosest to the fire before the fire exceeds the ability of the sprinkler discharge to extinguish or control thefire. Conditions that allow the fire to grow beyond that point before sprinkler activation or that interfere withthe quality of water distribution can produce conditions beyond the capabilities of the sprinkler systemdescribed in this standard. Unusually high ceilings or ceiling configurations that tend to divert the rising hotgases from sprinkler locations or change the sprinkler discharge pattern from its standard pattern canproduce fire conditions that cannot be extinguished or controlled by the systems described in this standard.

NFPA 13R references NFPA 13 in many aspects (hanging and bracing, design densities and spacingoutside of dwelling unit, painting and finish of sprinklers, welding, etc.). If this standard does not specificallyaddress a situation, NFPA 13 is a good resource that can be utilized by the installer and the authorityhaving jurisdiction for a solution. It is not the intent of this standard to require compliance with NFPA 13when NFPA 13R is silent on a subject. Only AHJ approval should be required.

Figure A.1.1(a) Bedroom.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

113 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 266 of 298

Page 272: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Figure A.1.1(b) Manufactured Home Bedroom.

Figure A.1.1(c) Living Room.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Clarifies application of NFPA 13R with respect to the height and story limits in model building codes.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

114 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 267 of 298

Page 273: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 37-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. 1.1 [Excluding anySub-Sections]]

Parent section to this proposedannex text.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Jeffrey Shapiro

Organization: International Code Consultants

Affilliation: National Multifamily Housing Council

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Apr 27 20:21:58 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

115 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 268 of 298

Page 274: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 5-NFPA 13R-2015 [ New Section after A.1.2 ]

A.1.4

It is the intent of the committee to recognize that future editions of this standard are a further refinement ofthis edition and earlier editions. The changes in future editions will reflect the continuing input of the fireprotection community in its attempt to meet the purpose stated in this standard. Compliance with allrequirements of a future edition could be considered as providing an equivalent level of system integrity andperformance of the system.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Many AHJ's will not recognize future editions. This annex note is intended to give guidance that use of an entire future edition of the standard could be considered an equivalency as allowed in 1.4. This language will be proposed to other sprinkler standards and has been accepted by NFPA 14 & NFPA 25.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Dec 22 10:19:43 EST 2015

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

116 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 269 of 298

Page 275: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 106-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. A.1.2 ]

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

117 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 270 of 298

Page 276: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

A.1.2

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

118 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 271 of 298

Page 277: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Various levels of sprinkler protection are available to provide life safety and property protection. Thisstandard is designed to provide a high, but not absolute, level of both life safety and a lesser level ofproperty protection . Greater protection to both life and property could , but to a lesser degree than wouldbe achieved by sprinklering all areas in accordance with using NFPA 13 , which permits the use ofresidential sprinklers in residential areas .

This standard recommends, but does not require, sprinklering of all areas in the building; it permitssprinklers to be omitted in certain areas. These areas have been proved by NFPA statistics to be thosewhere the incidence of life loss from fires in residential occupancies is low. Such an approach provides areasonable degree of fire safety. (See Table A.1.2 for deaths and injuries in multifamily residentialbuildings.)

It should be recognized that the omission of sprinklers from certain areas could result in the development ofuntenable conditions in adjacent spaces. Where evacuation times could be delayed, additional sprinklerprotection and other fire protection features, such as detection and compartmentation, could be necessary.

Table A.1.2 Fires and Associated Deaths and Injuries in Apartments by Area of Origin; Annual Average of1986–1990 Structure Fires Reported to U.S. Fire Departments

Area of OriginCivilianDeaths

CivilianPercent

Fires Percent Injuries Percent

Bedroom 309 33.9 17,960 15.8 1,714 27.2

Living room, family room, or den 308 33.8 10,500 9.3 1,272 20.2

Kitchen 114 12.5 46,900 41.4 1,973 31.2

Interior stairway 29 3.2 1,040 0.9 91 1.4

Hallway or corridor 23 2.6 3,130 2.8 165 2.6

Exterior balcony or open porch 17 1.8 1,880 1.7 69 1.1

Dining room 10 1.1 800 0.7 69 1.1

Closet 9 1.0 2,120 1.9 116 1.8

Multiple areas 9 1.0 780 0.7 38 0.6

Tool room or other supply storageroom or area

8 0.9 1,250 1.1 53 0.8

Unclassified area 8 0.9 480 0.4 29 0.5

Exterior stairway 8 0.8 870 0.8 22 0.4

Bathroom 7 0.7 2,510 2.2 101 1.6

Heating equipment room or area 6 0.6 2,510 2.2 75 1.2

Exterior wall surface 5 0.5 2,150 1.9 26 0.4

Laundry room or area 4 0.4 3,380 3.0 89 1.4

Crawl space or substructure space 4 0.4 1,490 1.3 62 1.0

Wall assembly or concealed space 3 0.4 1,020 0.9 21 0.3

Attic or ceiling/roof assembly orconcealed space

3 0.3 1,100 1.0 18 0.3

Ceiling/floor assembly or concealedspace

3 0.3 560 0.5 18 0.3

Garage or carport* 3 0.3 1,290 1.1 36 0.6

Lobby or entranceway 3 0.3 670 0.6 31 0.5

Unclassified structural area 3 0.3 520 0.5 32 0.5

Unclassified storage area 3 0.3 430 0.4 22 0.3

Unclassified function area 3 0.3 250 0.2 13 0.2

Laboratory 2 0.3 80 0.1 3 0.0

Elevator or dumbwaiter 1 0.2 220 0.2 4 0.1

Sales or showroom area 1 0.2 110 0.1 3 0.1

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

119 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 272 of 298

Page 278: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Area of OriginCivilianDeaths

CivilianPercent

Fires Percent Injuries Percent

Exterior roof surface 1 0.1 1,040 0.9 15 0.2

Unclassified means of egress 1 0.1 180 0.2 6 0.1

Office 1 0.1 120 0.1 4 0.1

Chimney 1 0.1 980 0.9 2 0.0

Personal service area 1 0.1 40 0.0 4 0.1

Library 1 0.1 10 0.0 0 0.0

Other known area 2 0.2 5,000 4.4 115 1.8

 Totals 912 100.0 113,390 100.0 6,313 100.0

Note: Fires are estimated to the nearest 10; civilian deaths and injuries are estimated to the nearest 1.

*Does not include dwelling garages coded as a separate property.

Source: 1986–1990 NFIRS and NFPA survey.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Clarification of intent. NFPA 13R is both a life-safety and property-protection standard. It is recognized for property protection by model building codes, which grant construction incentives to buildings protected by NFPA 13R systems, and sprinklers required for protection of balconies and garages are primarily provided for property protection. Certainly, NFPA 13 provides an increased level of protection for both life-safety and property protection, and the proposed revision makes this clear.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Jeffrey Shapiro

Organization: International Code Consultants

Affilliation: National Multifamily Housing Council

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 16:58:31 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

120 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 273 of 298

Page 279: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 110-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. A.3.3.1 ]

A.3.3.1 Bathroom.

A room is still considered a bathroom if it contains just a toilet. Additionally, two bathrooms can be adjacentto each other and are considered separate rooms, provided they are enclosed with the required level ofconstruction. .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

The requirement that the bathrooms "are enclosed with the required level of construction" should be removed as the 20 minute thermal barrier behind fixtures was no longer required beginning in the 2007 NFPA 13R. As long as each adjacent bathroom meets the definition of a bathroom, they should be considered separate rooms.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Daniel Mathias

Organization: Absolute Fire Protection Inc

Affilliation: AFSA

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 22:34:13 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

121 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 274 of 298

Page 280: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 10-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. A.5.1.1.1 ]

A.5.1.1.1

Compatible thread sealant or Teflon tape can be used in a CPVC sprinkler head adapter. However, acombination of the two cannot be used together. The manufacturer of the sprinkler head adapter has listedinstallation instructions that must be followed for each sprinkler head adapter used.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Remove the term "head". NFPA does not define a sprinkler head, only a sprinkler.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Feb 05 13:03:00 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

122 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 275 of 298

Page 281: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 92-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after A.6.2.3.3 ]

A.Table 6.2.3.3.3

Guidance for spacing around fireplaces

Additional Proposed Changes

File Name Description Approved

Fireplace2.pdf Guidance for spacing around fireplaces

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

The language provided in the table provides ambiguous information about spacing sprinklers with regard to fireplaces. These diagrams provide additional clarification. Alternatively, the Annex comment could be attached to 6.2.3.3.3.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 91-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. 6.2.3.3.3]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Robert Upson

Organization: National Fire Sprinkler Association

Affilliation: NFSA Engineering and Standards Committee

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 10:34:35 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

123 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 276 of 298

Page 282: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

36” 36”

60”

Recessed Fireplace: 60” from open face, 36” from sides of opening

Page 277 of 298

Page 283: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

36” 36”

Open Fireplace: 36” from faces with radiused corners

Page 278 of 298

Page 284: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 112-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. A.6.6.2 ]

A.6.6.2

A room is still considered a bathroom if it contains just a toilet. Additionally, two bathrooms can be adjacentto each other and are considered separate rooms, provided they are enclosed with the required level ofconstruction .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

The requirement that the bathrooms "are enclosed with the required level of construction" should be removed as the 20 minute thermal barrier behind fixtures was no longer required beginning in the 2007 NFPA 13R. As long as each adjacent bathroom meets the definition of a bathroom, they should be considered separate rooms.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Daniel Mathias

Organization: Absolute Fire Protection Inc

Affilliation: AFSA

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 22:50:48 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

124 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 279 of 298

Page 285: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 29-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. A.6.6.5 ]

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

125 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 280 of 298

Page 286: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

A.6.6.5

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

126 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 281 of 298

Page 287: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

An example of an open or exterior corridor, stair, or breezeway is one that is exposed to the outsideatmosphere (temperature). Another example is an exterior wraparound corridor that is typical in a two- tothree-story motel. [See Figure A.6.6.5(a) through Figure A.6.6.5(e) .]

Figure A.6.6.5(a) Example of Open Corridor — Arrangement 1.

Figure A.6.6.5(b) Example of Open Corridor — Arrangement 2.

Figure A.6.6.5(c) Example of Open Corridor — Arrangement 3.

Figure A.6.6.5(d) Example of Open Corridor — Arrangement 4.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

127 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 282 of 298

Page 288: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Figure A.6.6.5(e) Example of Exterior Corridor — Arrangement 5.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Delete this section. The 2015 IBC has added section 903.3.1.2.2 which requires sprinklers in open ended corridors and associated stairways that are not separated. This requirement has been included in 1027.6 but the ICC felt it needed to flag the requirement in the NFPA 13R section. As this committee did with the sprinklers on porches in buildings of Type 5 construction, it should align with what is found in the IBC.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 26-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. 6.6.5 [Excluding any Sub-Sections]]

Public Input No. 27-NFPA 13R-2016 [New Section after 6.6.9.4]

Public Input No. 28-NFPA 13R-2016 [Section No. 6.6.7]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Feb 25 14:56:44 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

128 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 283 of 298

Page 289: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 104-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. A.6.6.6 ]

A.6.6.6

Concealed spaces are permitted to have small openings such as grilles for return air when the space isbeing used as a plenum. Such small openings do not disqualify the space from being considered as aconcealed space, and sprinklers are still permitted to be omitted.

See Section 7.4 for additional information on attic sprinklers.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

Correlation with the addition of the new Section 7.4 for attic protection.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 103-NFPA 13R-2016 [New Section after 7.4] parent section for this annex

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Jeffrey Shapiro

Organization: International Code Consultants

Affilliation: National Multifamily Housing Council

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jun 29 16:36:02 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

129 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 284 of 298

Page 290: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 14-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. A.6.9 ]

A.6.9

These connections should be installed so that the valve can be opened fully and for a sufficient time periodto ensure a proper test without causing water damage. The drain should be designed and sized to verifythe sufficiency of the water supply.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

The purpose of the test connection is to verify that the water flow device is in proper working order. The way to verify the sufficiency of the water supply is to conduct a water flow test, not running water through the test connection.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Peter Schwab

Organization: Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinkler

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Feb 05 13:49:41 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

130 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 285 of 298

Page 291: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 81-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. A.7.1.1.3 ]

A.7.1.1.3

All residential sprinklers have been investigated under a flat, smooth, 8 ft (2.44 m) high horizontal ceiling.Some residential sprinklers have been investigated and listed for use under specific ceiling configurationssuch as a horizontal beamed ceiling. The performance of residential sprinklers under flat, smooth,horizontal ceilings has been well documented throughout the life of NFPA 13R. Prior to 2010, severalmanufacturers of residential sprinklers had performed testing and received listings for residential sprinklersunder certain slopes and in certain beam conditions. In 2010, the Fire Protection Research Foundation(FPRF) conducted a research project consisting of 76 FDS simulations and 12 full-scale fire tests. Theresults have been used to develop system design criteria in a generic manner in order to simplify the useof residential sprinklers. Some residential sprinkler listings still exist for situations beyond the scope of thegeneric design. See the FPRF report, “Analysis of the Performance of Residential Sprinkler Systems withSloped or Sloped and Beamed Ceilings,” dated July 2010 for more information.

For examples of selecting a compartment for consideration, see Figure A.7.1.1.3(a) and FigureA.7.1.1.3(b), which show examples of design configurations for compartments based on the presence oflintels to stop the flow of heat.

Figure A.7.1.1.3(a) Sprinkler Design Areas for Typical Residential Occupancy — Without Lintel.

Figure A.7.1.1.3(b) Sprinkler Design Areas for Typical Residential Occupancy — with Lintel.

Additional Proposed Changes

File Name Description Approved

scan0856.pdf suggested revision to Figure A.7.1.1.3(b)

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

NFPA 13R, 2016 Figure A.7.1.1.3(b) depicts a minimum 8" lintel between the Dining Room and Living Room. The 8" lintel alone does not meet the compartment definition which requires that the opening is limited to 8' width on any wall. Figure A.7.1.1.3(b) should be modified to depict a maximum 8' opening per the definition of a compartment found in NFPA 13R section 3.3.2.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

131 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 286 of 298

Page 292: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Page 287 of 298

Page 293: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Daniel Mathias

Organization: Absolute Fire Protection Inc

Affilliation: AFSA

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Jun 28 10:15:13 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

132 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 288 of 298

Page 294: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 73-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. A.7.3.3 ]

A.7.3.3

If a corridor separates the units and garages and garages are separated from each other and each garageis individually accessible by locked door, the individual garage is still accessed by the single dwelling

unit. Residential sprinklers and quick-response sprinklers at 0.05 gpm/ft2 (2.04 L/min/m2) densities havenot been tested for use in garages. However, field experience has shown that they will activate, sound analarm, and provide water distribution that will assist in controlling a fire.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

The fuel load/fire threat is effectively the same as that of an attached garage.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Brent Zimiga

Organization: Rapid Fire Protection

Affilliation: AFSA

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Jun 13 10:49:19 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

133 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 289 of 298

Page 295: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 54-NFPA 13R-2016 [ New Section after A.9.3(4) ]

A.9.4.1 The purpose of the adjustment is to take into account reasonable daily and seasonalvariations in the water supply, which are easily predicted and tracked by a water utility. It is not theintent to use this section to account for unusual conditions such as 100 year droughts or watermain breaks. These unusual conditions are handled through the Impairment Procedures of NFPA25 and should not be considered when determining the ability of a water supply to meet thedemand of a fire protection system under more normal circumstances.

A.9.4.2 Consider the following example. A waterflow test is conducted at a location where a citywater main is going to be tapped for a new sprinkler system. During the test, the static pressure ismeasured at 70 psi, the residual pressure is measured at 50 psi while 1300 gpm was dischargingfrom a nearby hydrant. The water utility is contacted and they indicate that a reasonable low staticpressure accounting for typical daily and seasonal fluctuations in this area is 55 psi. The equationthat describes the water supply available for a fire sprinkler system would be:

There are two ways to use this formula. One would be to assume two different values for Q,calculate P and then draw a graph on log 1.85 paper. Any fire sprinkler system demand falling onor below the line on this graph would be acceptable in accordance with NFPA 13 to work with thiswater supply. In this case, the two easiest flows to pick for Q would be 0 and 1300 gpm. When Q =0, P is simply 55 psi. When Q = 1300 gpm, P = 35 psi. These two points can be plotted on log 1.85paper as shown in Figure A.9.4.2.

The second way to use this formula would be to calculate the fire protection system and determinethe flow necessary to make the system work. Plug this flow into the formula above and see whatthe available pressure from the water supply will be at that flow. For example, if a sprinkler systemconnected to this water supply had a demand of 580 gpm, the available pressure from the watersupply would be:

P = (-20)(0.225) 55

P = 50.5 psi

So, as long as the sprinkler system has a pressure demand less than or equal to 50.5 psi, it willwork with this water supply.

Sprinkler system demand can be anywhere in shadedregion

FigureA-24-2-2-2-1.tiff

Figure A.9.4.2 Available Water Supply Curve for Example in Section A.9.4.2

Additional Proposed Changes

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

134 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 290 of 298

Page 296: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

File Name Description Approved

Safety_Margin_Proposal-NFPA_13R.docx

Here's the formulas and figures that I can't get into Terra View

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

This is explanation and examples of how the formula proposed in the body would be used and will be helpful to the user.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 53-NFPA 13R-2016 [New Section after 9.3]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Kenneth Isman

Organization: University of Maryland

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu May 26 12:32:41 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

135 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 291 of 298

Page 297: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Water Supply Adjustment Proposals Put Together Insert new sections as follows: 9.4 Where a waterflow test was conducted to determine the strength of a water supply, the volume and pressure available for use for a fire protection system shall be determined from either 9.4.1 or 9.4.2. 9.4.1* Knowledge of the water supply and engineering judgment taking into account reasonable daily and seasonal fluctuations not extreme conditions. 9.4.2* Use of the following formula:

LR

SR PQ

QPPP

85.1

P = The pressure available from the water supply to use for a fire protection system that will be calculated for a given flow (Q) Q = The flow that will be used to calculate the available pressure from the water supply. PR = The residual pressure measured during the waterflow test while the flow QR was discharging from the water supply. PS = The static pressure measured during the waterflow test. QR = The flow discharging from the water supply when PR was measured. PL = The expected low static pressure at the location of the test results accounting for daily and seasonal fluctuations (not extreme conditions) obtained from the water utility. Where the water authority does not provide PL, see 9.4.3.

9.4.3 Where the water authority does not provide a value for PL, the value of PL shall be calculated from the following formula:

PL = PS – 10 psi A.9.4.1 The purpose of the adjustment is to take into account reasonable daily and seasonal variations in the water supply, which are easily predicted and tracked by a water utility. It is not the intent to use this section to account for unusual conditions such as 100 year droughts or water main breaks. These unusual conditions are handled through the Impairment Procedures of NFPA 25 and should not be considered when determining the ability of a water supply to meet the demand of a fire protection system under more normal circumstances.

Page 292 of 298

Page 298: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

A.9.4.2 Consider the following example. A waterflow test is conducted at a location where a city water main is going to be tapped for a new sprinkler system. During the test, the static pressure is measured at 70 psi, the residual pressure is measured at 50 psi while 1300 gpm was discharging from a nearby hydrant. The water utility is contacted and they indicate that a reasonable low static pressure accounting for typical daily and seasonal fluctuations in this area is 55 psi. The equation that describes the water supply available for a fire sprinkler system would be:

551300

705085.1

QP

There are two ways to use this formula. One would be to assume two different values for Q, calculate P and then draw a graph on log 1.85 paper. Any fire sprinkler system demand falling on or below the line on this graph would be acceptable in accordance with NFPA 13 to work with this water supply. In this case, the two easiest flows to pick for Q would be 0 and 1300 gpm. When Q = 0, P is simply 55 psi. When Q = 1300 gpm, P = 35 psi. These two points can be plotted on log 1.85 paper as shown in Figure A.9.4.2. The second way to use this formula would be to calculate the fire protection system and determine the flow necessary to make the system work. Plug this flow into the formula above and see what the available pressure from the water supply will be at that flow. For example, if a sprinkler system connected to this water supply had a demand of 580 gpm, the available pressure from the water supply would be:

551300

5807050

85.1

P

P = (-20)(0.225) + 55

P = 50.5 psi

So, as long as the sprinkler system has a pressure demand less than or equal to 50.5 psi, it will work with this water supply.

Page 293 of 298

Page 299: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Figure A.9.4.2 Available Water Supply Curve for Example in Section A.9.4.2

Sprinkler system demand can be anywhere in shaded region

Page 294 of 298

Page 300: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 2-NFPA 13R-2015 [ Chapter B ]

Annex B Informational References

B.1 Referenced Publications.

The documents or portions thereof listed in this annex are referenced within the informational sections ofthis standard and are not part of the requirements of this document unless also listed in Chapter 2 for otherreasons.

B.1.1 NFPA Publications.

National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471.

NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, 2016 edition.

NFPA 20, Standard for the Installation of Stationary Pumps for Fire Protection, 2016 edition.

NFPA 24, Standard for the Installation of Private Fire Service Mains and Their Appurtenances, 2016edition.

NFPA 25, Standard for the Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems,2014 edition.

“Analysis of the Performance of Residential Sprinkler Systems with Sloped or Sloped or Beamed Ceilings,”Fire Protection Research Foundation, NFPA, July 2010.

B.1.2 Other Publications.

B.1.2.1 ASTM Publications.

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM F437, Standard Specification for Threaded Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic PipeFittings, Schedule 80, 2009 2015 .

ASTM F438, Standard Specification for Socket-Type Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic PipeFittings, Schedule 40, 2009 2015 .

ASTM F439, Standard Specification for Socket-Type Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic PipeFittings, Schedule 80, 2009 2013 .

IEEE/ ASTM SI10, Standard for Use of the International System of Units (SI): the Modern Metric System,2002 2010 .

B.1.2.2 NFSA Publications.

National Fire Sprinkler Association, P.O. Box 1000 40 Jon Barrett Road , Patterson, NY 12563.

Valentine and Isman, Kitchen Cabinets and Residential Sprinklers, 2005.

Valentine and Isman, Interaction of Residential Sprinklers, Ceiling Fans and Similar Obstructions, 2005.

B.1.2.3 UL Publications.

Underwriters Laboratories Inc., 333 Pfingsten Road, Northbrook, IL 60062-2096.

ANSI/UL 1626, Residential Sprinklers for Fire Protection Service, 2008.

B.2 Informational References. (Reserved)

B.3 References for Extracts in Informational Sections.

NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, 2016 edition.

NFPA 24, Standard for the Installation of Private Fire Service Mains and Their Appurtenances, 2016edition.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

136 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 295 of 298

Page 301: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Referenced current SDO names, addresses, standard names, numbers, and editions.

Related Public Inputs for This Document

Related Input Relationship

Public Input No. 1-NFPA 13R-2015[Chapter 2]

Referenced current SDO names, addresses, standard names,numbers, and editions.

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Aaron Adamczyk

Organization: [ Not Specified ]

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sun Dec 20 19:39:44 EST 2015

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

137 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 296 of 298

Page 302: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 8-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. B.1.2.1 ]

B.1.2.1 ASTM Publications.

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM F437, Standard Specification for Threaded Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic PipeFittings, Schedule 80, 2009 2015 .

ASTM F438, Standard Specification for Socket-Type Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic PipeFittings, Schedule 40, 2009 2015 .

ASTM F439, Standard Specification for Socket-Type Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Plastic PipeFittings, Schedule 80, 2009 2013 .

IEEE/ASTM SI10, Standard for Use of the International System of Units (SI): the Modern Metric System,2002 2010 .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

updates

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Marcelo Hirschler

Organization: GBH International

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jan 06 18:25:36 EST 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

138 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 297 of 298

Page 303: Technical Committee on Residential Sprinklers · Kenneth E. Isman Chair University of Maryland 7402 Forests Edge Court Laurel, MD 20707 SE 10/1/1997 AUT-RSS Roland A. Asp Principal

Public Input No. 79-NFPA 13R-2016 [ Section No. B.1.2.3 ]

B.1.2.3 UL Publications.

Underwriters Laboratories Inc., 333 Pfingsten Road, Northbrook, IL 60062-2096.

ANSI/UL 1626, Residential Sprinklers for Fire Protection Service, 2008, Revised 2012 .

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Input

This proposed change reflects a reference to an updated UL Standard

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Ronald Farr

Organization: UL LLC

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Jun 27 15:34:27 EDT 2016

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

139 of 139 6/30/2016 1:23 PM

Page 298 of 298