Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
In Vitro Toxicity Testing of Tobacco Smoke Sub-Group
Technical Report
Ames Assay
Proficiency Study
March 2016
Author:
Wendy Wagstaff
Labstat International ULC, Canada
Trial Coordinators:
Betsy Bombick
R.J. Reynolds, USA
T.S. Kumaravel
Advanced Technologies (Cambridge) Ltd, UK
Task Force Coordinator:
Kei Yoshino
Japan Tobacco Inc., Japan
Table of Contents
1. Summary ........................................................................................................................... 3
2. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 3
3. Participants ........................................................................................................................ 4
4. Study Protocol ................................................................................................................... 4
5. Results – Raw Data ........................................................................................................... 5
6. Statistical Analysis and Interpretations ............................................................................. 6
6.1 Reported Dose Ranges and Solvent Controls ............................................................ 6
6.2 Specific Activity ........................................................................................................ 6
6.3 Effect of S9 Percentage ............................................................................................. 7
6.4 Differentiating Test Brands ....................................................................................... 8
6.5 Comparison among Labs ........................................................................................... 9
7. Discussion of Results ...................................................................................................... 12
7.1 Data Audit ................................................................................................................ 12
7.2 Audit Findings ......................................................................................................... 12
8. Conclusions ..................................................................................................................... 12
9. References ....................................................................................................................... 13
Appendix A – Raw Data .......................................................................................................... 14
A-1 Raw Revertant Colony Count Data .................................................................. 14
Appendix B – Calculated Specific Activities (revertants/mg NFDPM) .................................. 32
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 3/33
1. Summary
An Ames Assay proficiency study was conducted by member laboratories of the CORESTA
In Vitro Toxicity Testing Task Force (a Sub-Group since 2015). Given that different
procedures (internal or regulatory) are followed by the participating laboratories, the purpose
was not to develop a CORESTA Recommended Method but to evaluate the mutagenicity of a
mainstream smoke extract from two cigarettes using a common Study Plan. This enabled
laboratories to evaluate method proficiency, compare results with those of other laboratories,
and obtain an external audit of their documentation procedures that might identify potential
areas for improvement. Each laboratory therefore has been able to benefit both technically
(scientific methods) and administratively (documentation procedures) from their participation.
Twelve laboratories participated in the study and the protocol was approved by each
laboratory manager. Ames assays were conducted using smoke condensates (particulate
matter collected on Cambridge filter pads and extracted in dimethylsulfoxide) on two
cigarettes.
The cigarettes were coded as follows:
A, C, E: Canadian Monitor 8 (CM8)
B, D, F: Kentucky Reference 3R4F (3R4F)
Smoke condensates were prepared using the ISO smoking regimen at one laboratory, these
were frozen at approximately -70°C, and shipped on dry ice to each laboratory. Ames assays
were conducted according to the protocol, using bacterial strains of TA98 and TA100 ± S9
metabolic activation. All laboratories used 5% S9 mix; some laboratories also used 10% S9
mix. At least six treatment concentrations were evaluated, with at least three replicate plates
per concentration. Raw data, worksheets and summary conclusions were submitted to the
Study Coordinator. Worksheets were assessed by the Task Force auditor for quality
assurance. Raw data was coded, and a common statistical analysis was conducted by the
Study Statistician.
Participants generally followed the prescribed protocol. Deviations were minor and were
considered unlikely to have a significant impact on the study outcome.
All the laboratories detected concentration-related increases in revertant numbers in each
strain that were sufficient to be considered mutagenic responses by the assessment criteria
applied by each laboratory. Based on the results of the common statistical analysis, eleven of
twelve labs were capable of differentiating the response of Canadian Monitor 8 from that of
Kentucky Reference 3R4F (KR 3R4F > Canadian Monitor 8) using TA98 with S9 activation;
six labs showed a significant difference with TA100 +S9 (KR 3R4F > Canadian Monitor 8).
2. Introduction
At the 2007 meeting of the CORESTA In Vitro Toxicity Testing Task Force (Jeju, 2007) the
Task Force confirmed its intention to conduct an Ames Assay Proficiency study with the
following purpose:
To conduct a proficiency testing programme to evaluate cigarette smoke particulate
matter using a common experimental design for Ames assay. This will be achieved by
evaluating the potential mutagenic activity of two smoke condensates by examining its
ability to revert two histidine requiring strains of Salmonella typhimurium (TA98 and
TA100) in the absence and presence of a rat liver metabolising (S-9) system.
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 4/33
The objective of this study was to evaluate the Ames assay ability to discriminate the
mutagenic potential of mainstream smoke particulate matter extracts from two cigarette
samples (cigarette smoke condensate, CSC) by investigating effects on histidine requiring
strains of Salmonella typhimurium in the absence and presence of a liver metabolising system
(Ames et al., 1975, OECD Test Guidelines number 471). The Ames assay is a rapid, reliable
and economical method for screening compounds for potential genetic activity at the
nucleotide level (Ames et al., 1975). When exposed to a mutagen, some of the bacteria in the
treated population undergo genetic changes which cause them to revert to a non-histidine
requiring state and thus grow in the absence of exogenous histidine. Different tester strains
are used because each is mutated by particular chemical classes of compound. A large
database has been accumulated with this assay, confirming its ability to detect genetically
active compounds of most chemical classes with around 80 to 90% sensitivity and specificity
(Gatehouse et al., 1990).
The following bacterial strains were used in this trial:
Strain Organism Type of Mutation
TA98 S. typhimurium frame-shift
TA100 S. typhimurium base-pair substitution
3. Participants
Table 1 - List of Participating Laboratories
Participants Study contribution
Altadis
Arista Laboratories Collecting and providing condensate
British American Tobacco (ATC) QA Review
Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited
Japan Tobacco Inc
KT&G Central Research Institute
Labstat International ULC Statistical Analysis
Lorillard Tobacco Company (A W Spears)
Ökolab/JTI
ITG/Reemtsma GmbH
RJ Reynolds
Zhengzhou Tobacco Research Institute of CNTC
During the course of this study, Eian Massey (BAT), Betsy Bombick (RJR) and Bernhard
Majer (Ökolab/JTI) served respectively as Co-coordinators of the Task Force. T.S. Kumaravel
served as initial Study Trial Coordinator, followed by Betsy Bombick.
4. Study Protocol
The protocol, summarized below, was reviewed and approved by a Study Manager from each
participating laboratory. The approved Study Plan is available upon request.
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 5/33
1. Samples:
- Kentucky Reference 3R4F (3R4F)
- Canadian Monitor 8 (CM8)
The cigarettes were provided by Arista Laboratories.
2. Cigarettes were conditioned and smoked under ISO conditions (ISO 3308).
3. Three independent smoking sessions were performed (3 separate days). Smoke
chemistry results are presented in table 2 below:
Table 2 - Smoke chemistry results (mean ± 1 standard deviation)
Code Sample
ID
Weight
(mg/cig)
Puff Count
(per cig)
TPM
(mg/cig)
Water
(mg/cig)
Nicotine
(mg/cig)
Tar
(mg/cig)
A CM8 967.0±3.3 8.3±0.1 14.7±0.5 0.64±0.17 1.02±0.03 13.01±0.45
C CM8 968.6±7.2 8.4±0.1 16.4±0.4 0.96 ±0.25 1.08±0.03 14.37±0.45
E CM8 969.9±5.5 8.4±0.1 16.1±0.4 2.28±0.46 1.04±0.03 12.82±0.49
B 3R4F 1043.0±5.2 8.7±0.1 11.0±0.5 0.24±0.12 0.71±0.04 10.09±0.45
D 3R4F 1047.1±6.0 8.8±0.2 11.4±0.7 0.99± 0.16 0.73±0.03 9.67±0.53
F 3R4F 1045.1±6.7 8.7±0.2 11.4±0.5 0.56± 0.18 0.73±0.04 10.05±0.47
4. Pads of each replicate were extracted to provide 10mg Nicotine Free Dry Particulate
Matter (NFDPM)/mL in DMSO.
5. Each participant received 2 aliquots of each condensate extract (4mL each), for a total of
12 vials (2 aliquots x triplicate smokings x 2 cigarettes).
6. Smoke condensates were coded as follows:
A: CM8 Replicate 1
B: 3R4F Replicate 1
C: CM8 Replicate 2
D: 3R4F Replicate 2
E: CM8 Replicate 3
F: 3R4F Replicate 3
7. Assays were conducted using TA98 and TA100 ± S9 using at least 6 non-zero test sample
concentrations and 3 plates per concentration. Concurrent negative and positive controls
were also assayed.
8. Work sheets were sent to each participating laboratory for recording experimental
information and data.
5. Results – Raw Data
Laboratories provided experimental information, raw data and summary data using the
provided worksheets. Summary results as provided by each individual laboratory are reported
in APPENDIX A.
Each participating laboratory used 5% metabolic activation; five laboratories also used 10%.
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 6/33
6. Statistical Analysis and Interpretations
Data analysis was performed with consideration to the following aspects of the study data:
• Reported dose ranges
• Solvent control data
• Average dose-response data
• Specific Activity: reported vs. determined using single methodology (statistician)
• Effect of S9 percentage (5% vs. 10%)
• Ability of individual labs to differentiate between the two test brands (CM8, 3R4F)
• Comparison of assay results among labs
• Determination of “outliers”
• Repeatability (r) and Reproducibility (R) estimates
Further details, including the presentation “Results and Statistical Analysis of Collaborative
Ames Assay Proficiency Data: In Vitro Toxicology Task Force, February 2009” given by
Wendy Wagstaff at the February 2009 Task Force meeting, are available upon request.
6.1 Reported Dose Ranges and Solvent Controls
The dose ranges reported as being used by the participating labs ranged from a low of 10µg
TPM (or NFDPM)/plate to a high of 1000 µg/plate, with the majority of labs reporting
maximum doses of between 250 and 500 µg/plate.
The dose range reported for Lab 12 could not be converted to units that were consistent with
other labs. Lab 12 was therefore excluded from any analysis in which data is compared
amongst laboratories.
The solvent control results were fairly consistent among labs, with all labs except one (Lab 5)
showing comparable abilities to reproduce solvent control results.
6.2 Specific Activity
6.2.1 Methodology
A common methodology for determining specific activity was applied to all results submitted
by participating labs as per Margolin et al., 1981 by fitting the quadratic model y=𝛽0 + 𝛽1𝑥 +𝛽2𝑥
2 to the tobacco smoke condensate sample dose X (e.g. mg NFDPM/plate) and revertant
colony count Y (revertant colonies/plate) for each individual replicate assay and removing the
highest dose data until the quadratic term was no longer significant (α = 0.05). In fitting the
quadratic model however, only doses contributing to downward curvature were considered for
exclusion.
Specific activity results determined using the above methodology for each individual
laboratory are reported in Appendix B.
6.2.2 Self-Reported vs. Determined Specific Activity
For the majority of labs, there were no large differences in self-reported specific activity
results and those determined by the statistician using the above methodology. For labs where
a large difference existed, there may have been issues with the methodology applied by the
individual lab or lack of clear units associated with the specific activity results reported.
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 7/33
6.3 Effect of S9 Percentage
6.3.1 Methodology
For each individual lab and test system, the difference in assay results between the two
different concentrations of S9 (5%, 10%) was evaluated by determining whether the linear
regression model coefficient β1 was significantly different between the two assays for each
test brand (CM8, 3R4F). Data for triplicate test samples was pooled for each test brand when
creating the linear regression models.
6.3.2 Results
Of the 5 labs that submitted data with the two different concentrations of S9, two labs (1 and
11) showed consistent results in which the 10% S9 assays showed lower levels of
mutagenicity (i.e. specific activity) than the 5% S9 assays. Two other labs (4 and 6)
demonstrated no significant effect of the S9 concentration while the third lab (12) appeared to
have mixed results. No specific conclusion regarding the impact of the concentration of S9
can be drawn from this data set since there is no overwhelming evidence either way.
Canadian Monitor #8 (CM8) Kentucky Reference 3R4F
Fig 1: Comparison of S9 Percentage (TA98 +S9, Mean Specific Activities ± 95% C.I.)
Canadian Monitor #8 (CM8) Kentucky Reference 3R4F
Fig 2: Comparison of S9 Percentage (TA100 +S9, Mean Specific Activities ± 95% C.I.)
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 8/33
6.4 Differentiating Test Brands
6.4.1 Methodology
For each individual lab and test system, the ability of a lab to differentiate the assay results of
the two test brands (CM8, 3R4F) was evaluated by determining whether the linear regression
model coefficient β1 was significantly different between the two test brands. Data for
triplicate test samples was pooled for each test brand when creating the linear regression
models.
6.4.2 Results
Eleven of twelve laboratories determined that the mutagenicity of Kentucky Reference 3R4F
was significantly greater than that of Canadian Monitor 8 in the TA98 +S9 test system. Only
six of eleven laboratories were able to differentiate between 3R4F and CM8 in the TA100
+S9 test system, also finding 3R4F more mutagenic than CM8. No predominant patterns, in
regards to specific activity differentiation, were observed in assays without S9 activation with
either TA98 or TA100.
Fig 3: Differentiating 3R4F and CM8: TA98 +S9 (5%) [Mean Specific Activities ± 95% C.I.]
Fig 4: Differentiating 3R4F and CM8: TA100 +S9 (5%) [Mean Specific Activities ± 95% C.I.]
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 9/33
Fig 5: Differentiating 3R4F and CM8: TA98 (-S9) [Mean Specific Activities ± 95% C.I.]
Fig 6: Differentiating 3R4F and CM8: TA100 (-S9) [Mean Specific Activities ± 95% C.I.]
6.5 Comparison among Labs
6.5.1 Methodology
In comparing specific activities among laboratories for the same test brand (CM8, 3R4F) and
test system, analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the specific activity estimates among
laboratories (3 replicate specific activity estimates per lab for each brand in the form of
samples {A, C, E} and {B, D, F}) was applied to determine whether the mean specific
activity estimate is the same for all labs. (The dose ranges reported for Lab 12 could not be
converted to units that were consistent with other labs, thus Lab 12 was excluded from all
analysis presented in these subsections.) In cases where the ANOVA was significant (α =
0.05), paired comparisons were made using the Student-Newman-Keuls (S-N-K) multiple
range test.
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 10/33
6.5.2 Results
With the Student-Newman-Keuls (S-N-K) multiple range test, significantly positive pairs
were connected by green lines in the following tables.
Canadian Monitor #8 (CM8) Kentucky Reference 3R4F
Fig 7: S-N-K Multiple Range Test: TA98 +S9 (5%) [Mean Specific Activities ± 95% C.I.]
Canadian Monitor #8 (CM8) Kentucky Reference 3R4F
Fig 8: S-N-K Multiple Range Test: TA100 +S9 (5%) Mean Specific Activities ± 95% C.I.
Canadian Monitor #8 (CM8) Kentucky Reference 3R4F
Fig 9: S-N-K Multiple Range Test: TA98 (-S9) [Mean Specific Activities ± 95% C.I.]
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 11/33
Canadian Monitor #8 (CM8) Kentucky Reference 3R4F
Fig 10: S-N-K Multiple Range Test: TA100 -S9 Mean Specific Activities ± 95% C.I.
6.5.3 Multiple Range Test ‘Outliers’
In instances where the ANOVA was significant and the S-N-K multiple range test identified a
single lab whose mean specific activity results were significantly different from those of any
other lab, that lab was determined to be an ‘outlier’ for the test brand and test system. All lab
results determined to be ‘outliers’ are listed in the table below.
Table 3 – ‘Outliers’
Test system Sample ID Outlying
Lab
Specific activity
(rev/mg NFDPM) Range of other labs
TA98 +5% S9 3R4F 6 4757 1998 - 3520
CM8 6 2226 1263 - 1862
TA100 +5% S9 3R4F 1 1515 518 - 1086
CM8 none - -
TA98 -S9 3R4F none - -
CM8 none - -
TA100 -S9 3R4F none - -
CM8 none - -
6.5.4 Specific Activity Repeatability and Reproducibility Estimates
Following the removal of the ‘outlying’ lab data identified in the above table, the replicate
specific activity determinations from all remaining labs were pooled to determine estimates of
repeatability (r) and reproducibility (R) for each combination of test brand (CM8, 3R4F) and
test system, which are displayed in the table below.
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 12/33
Table 4 - Specific Activity Repeatability and Reproducibility
Specific Activity (rev/mg NFDPM)
Test
System
Sample
ID
Number of
Labs
Grand
Mean
Repeatability Reproducibility
r C.V. R C.V.
TA98 +S9 (5%) 3R4F 10 2794 586 11% 1148 21%
CM8 10 1487 262 9% 474 16%
TA100 +S9 (5%) 3R4F 9 884 298 17% 495 29%
CM8 10 678 244 18% 423 32%
TA98 -S9 3R4F 11 89 88 51% 132 76%
CM8 11 72 107 76% 138 98%
TA100 -S9 3R4F 10 362 246 35% 472 67%
CM8 10 344 373 55% 431 64%
7. Discussion of Results
7.1 Data Audit
Study data was audited for
Evidence of following the agreed Study Plan
Evidence of “fair testing”
Accuracy of the reported results
7.2 Audit Findings
Some differences in methodology were observed. These differences included technical
details (i.e., concentrations) and unknown analytical details. The specific impact of these
differences is unknown, but the majority of the audit findings were minor and considered
unlikely to impact the final results overall. Further details of the audit findings are available
upon request.
8. Conclusions
Participants generally followed the overall guidance prescribed in the study protocol.
However, some laboratories did not submit requested information or full detailed worksheets,
and the Study Auditor found clear room for improvement in documentation procedures.
Eleven of twelve laboratories were able to differentiate the response of CM8 from that of
3R4F (3R4F > CM8) in the TA98 +S9 test system. The differences were much less
pronounced, and in many cases insignificant, in all other evaluated test systems (e.g. TA100
+S9 or TA98/TA100 -S9).
This Proficiency Trial was designed to:
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 13/33
Evaluate the mutagenicity of two cigarettes using a common study protocol
Enable laboratories to evaluate method proficiency
Enable laboratories to evaluate their documentation procedures via an independent limited
audit of study documents
The goals of the proficiency study were accomplished. The Ames assay is sufficiently
sensitive to distinguish significant differences between the two test cigarettes in at least one of
the applied test systems (TA98 +S9), and each laboratory benefitted from comparing their
results/methodology with that of the other participating laboratories.
9. References
1. Ames, B.N., McCann, J. & Yamasaki, E. (1975) Methods for detecting carcinogens and
mutagens with Salmonella/mammalian-microsome mutagenicity test. Mutation Res. 31,
347-364.
2. Gatehouse, D.G., Wilcox, P., Forster, R., Rowland, I. & Callender, R.D. (1990) Bacterial
mutation assays. In "Basic Mutagenicity Tests. UKEMS Recommended Procedures."
Report of the UKEMS Sub-committee on Guidelines for Mutagenicity Testing. Ed D.J.
Kirkland. Cambridge University Press.
3. OECD Guideline for testing of chemicals, Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test, number 471
(adopted 21 July 1997).
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 14/33
Appendix A – Raw Data
A-1 Raw Revertant Colony Count Data
A-1.1 Sample A (TA98)
Participating CSC TA98 (+S9) with 5% S9 TA98 (-S9) TA98 (+S9) with 10% S9
Laboratory (µg/mL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
1
0 19 18 17
13 13 8
15 22 17
10 32 27 30
20 15 9
17 21 30
25 48 59 57
19 32 19
33 30 34
50 71 87 93
21 29 21
54 58 56
75 144 113 137
20 19 20
69 73 82
125 164 178 166
18 16 20
143 155 117
250 309 259 276
39 (C) 30 43
247 247 261
2
0 30 32
30 32
50 118 91 141
4 18 24
100 218 182 229
20 0 26
150 227 290 248
3 0
200 257 298 295
5
21
250 243 259 285
19 27 16
300 285 270 299
15 14 17
3
0 138 112 81
99 134 122
25 91 113 106
101 116 143
50 135 129 104
71 112 109
75 169 180 131
129 143 152
100 202 177 180
127 81 80
125 217 235 227
91 87 88
250 306 303 284
175 134 138
500 302 292 256
106 165 121
4
0 53 45 40 50
43 38 36 38
43 49 40 41
50 148 125 109 136
35 31 47 31
99 112 107 99
100 184 206 212 234
56 113 (c) 39 48
149 137 157 160
200 342 314 280 232
77 85 81 113
316 284 316 265
300 463 471 426 458
44 93 103 84
550 398 501 405
500 416 334 396 C
158 145 141 164
617 458 436 413
1000 301 229 221 256
150 136 190 168
385 417 329 305
5
0 394 379 391
26 23 42
50 497 439 454
34 32 28
100 613 501 497
32 24 29
150 570 635 612
43 36 33
200 766 686 664
30 48 58
250 809 738 696
40 54 42
300 (541)* (672)* 765
22 33 36
6
0 27 27 30
16 20 23
31 33 29
25 69 81 76
22 28 19
63 63 58
50 154 142 151
22 28 18
116 92 111
75 185 199 228
20 23 36
189 198 162
100 274 249 281
23 26 23
241 229 234
150 313 339 336
43 30 25
375 354 342
200 363 357 358
49 46 49
506 461 507
400 336 305 327
tox tox tox
527 578 623
800
tox tox tox
7
0 34 31 30
19 16 13
25 49 51 56
26 20 33
50 95 80 71
25 23 29
75 104 133 99
24 23 18
100 124 160 150
26 20 24
125 168 174 168
38 16 25
200 264 206 239
31 36 33
8
0 27 29 40
19 23 20
25 43 40 37
21 20 23
50 84 79 67
19 28 25
75 123 120 129
24 27 29
100 160 167 145
18 23 20
125 196 180 204
22 24 36
250 244 243 232
32 37 32
500 367 348 349
62 75 69
9
0 33 22 35 24 34
35 33 22 24 29
1000 168 159 200
tox tox tox
500 289 236 267
66 69 51
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 15/33
Participating CSC TA98 (+S9) with 5% S9 TA98 (-S9) TA98 (+S9) with 10% S9
Laboratory (µg/mL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
250 299 265 325
44 46 36
150 272 265 272
35 48 51
100 192 166 189
42 30 26
50 120 119 116
36 35 33
25 86 61 71
21 37 27
10
0 73 51 51
28 36 38
25 86 61 71
21 37 27
100 192 166 189
42 30 26
150 272 265 272
35 48 51
250 299 265 325
44 46 36
500 289 236 267
66 69 51
1000 168 159 200
tox tox tox
11
0 18 27 24 39 37 22 15 11 9
28 35 18
25 64 53 71 52 70 48 23 25 25
34 42 51
50 82 117 103 84 84 68 18 19 22
48 58 56
75 99 108 118 99 114 99 43 31 31
66 82 85
100 169 140 180 125 144 118 18 42 36
84 114 104
125 154 178 188 166 195 136 24 42 38
103 128 133
250 252 242 255 206 229 252 50 56 45
248 218 250
12
0 16 27 19
8 7 15
13 22 10
156 16 12 8
23 11 15
19 26 18
313 26 24 27
27 19 32
22 47 68
625 46 45 40
56 87 61
63 76 73
1250 41 42 47
88 73 89
93 96 83
2500 75 67 72
56 74 66
187 174 127
5000 80 67 72
57 60 98
152 168 114
c: Contamination, tox: Growth Inhibition, *: Plate contaminated or plate skewed)
A-1.2 Sample A (TA100)
Participating CSC TA100 (+S9) with 5% S9 TA100 (-S9) TA100 (+S9) with 10% S9
Laboratory (µg/mL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
1
0 98 99 106
100 96 91
91 92 100
10 107 125 117
110 100 141
111 118 112
25 120 117 125
135 153 99
111 96 78
50 156 113 136
139 152 142
135 135 112
75 188 180 165
144 100 113
167 123 112
125 215 200 194
161 135 170
169 167 154
250 247 310 246
120 144 148
273 234 204
2
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
3
0 200 147 162
159 166 164
25 196 245 188
152 164 285
50 180 188 213
167 168 174
75 241 245 213
182 196 205
100 197 244 246
199 179 205
125 231 221 207
183 179 155
250 261 260 351
164 160 130
500 323 333 350
144 144 95
4
0 173 175 197 184
171 160 163 214
196 194 191 196
50 213 200 217 221
218 213 190 226
178 192 192 224
100 240 210 232 220
236 218 226 230
212 182 196 212
200 237 230 269 278
265 286 313 274
261 234 221 236
300 241 242 274 240
248 173 257 273
278 249 272 290
500 229 226 252 257
340 312 318 352
C 269 257 262
1000 266 269 269 250
349 354 417 449
C 286 318 293
5
0 465 459 453
127 97 102
50 498 489 511
106 97 128
100 511 491 525
116 114 121
150 595 553 552
136 104 131
200 562 600 620
115 109 123
250 642 619 599
130 151 153
300 671 603 577
171 150 139
6 0 92 111 90
63 77 81
93 93 75
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 16/33
Participating CSC TA100 (+S9) with 5% S9 TA100 (-S9) TA100 (+S9) with 10% S9
Laboratory (µg/mL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
25 134 129 105
87 96 108
118 112 114
50 128 133 123
122 97 108
122 128 131
75 154 115 161
126 115 108
160 166 131
100 147 180 175
120 111 113
144 168 167
150 203 180 C
142 133 129
197 174 171
200 203 220 182
175 146 150
203 211 221
400 201 244 225
211 214 241
251 255 269
800
tox tox tox
7
0 73 103 83
89 81 84
25 90 78 98
108 91 90
50 80 104 80
109 76 106
75 111 110 121
99 104 110
100 90 95 108
95 98 106
125 133 149 135
103 104 96
200 150 188 154
99 111 111
8
0 123 107 117
125 131 132
25 139 144 137
136 128 139
50 141 157 130
128 135 137
75 176 159 157
165 167 164
100 179 181 180
148 135 154
125 204 173 190
171 161 157
250 201 237 208
168 172 188
500 292 277 315
100 120 112
9
0 127 136 154 137 157
106 101 112 118 101
1000 368 334 374
tox tox tox
500 330 361 353
212 189 203
250 241 283 256
247 234 215
150 258 274 288
188 201 175
100 227 225 218
179 159 140
50 192 194 193
138 102 118
25 161 170 157
137 126 120
10
0 144 125 149
112 123 140
50 203 175 186
162 172 140
100 209 224 221
168 173 164
150 270 253 231
199 197 198
200 285 243 263
221 177 202
250 167 264 286
203 203 215
300 325 301 313
221 203 179
11
0 145 134 118 154 113 135 143 110 125
107 122 133
25 141 134 131 145 * 149 157 161 157
125 141 143
50 131 169 147 177 182 177 171 184 168
147 169 136
75 166 163 147 179 178 200 169 182 156
148 150 155
100 178 152 198 223 197 217 175 171 183
170 169 203
125 189 197 193 211 226 216 194 229 180
207 212 168
250 223 209 207 291 252 281 151 169 189
225 239 243
12
0 75 56 77
41 39 51
66 70 53
156 50 80 70
79 64 87
85 83 71
313 63 72 88
76 80 93
60 97 69
625 62 106 99
99 85 79
75 77 64
1250 52 48 42
77 83 82
44 85 134
2500 51 59 73
113 106 93
85 71 63
5000 72 63 102
84 78 73
76 91 88
(c: Contamination, tox: Growth Inhibition, *: Plate contaminated or plate skewed)
A-1.3 Sample B (TA98)
Participating CSC TA98 (+S9) with 5% S9 TA98 (-S9) TA98 (+S9) with 10% S9
Laboratory (µg/mL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
1
0 19 18 17 13 13 8 15 22 17
10 45 46 29 19 18 5 33 29 33
25 67 99 70 16 22 28 43 45 56
50 168 191 156 19 14 19 94 85 91
75 278 273 257 30 26 28 126 156 157
125 406 380 354 29 26 27 314 351 277
250 511 570 595 58 41 52 512 526 637
2
0 30 32 M 30 32 M
50 157 170 197 0 19 27
100 312 309 314 6 4 M
150 370 399 417 8 M 16
200 438 440 413 15 11 10
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 17/33
Participating CSC TA98 (+S9) with 5% S9 TA98 (-S9) TA98 (+S9) with 10% S9
Laboratory (µg/mL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
250 477 509 463 18 15 17
300 437 42 458 12 19 20
3
0 106 76 105 121 68 91
25 237 168 177 95 108 78
50 175 138 259 83 113 126
75 253 231 244 91 105 99
100 293 259 365 138 102 115
125 316 323 289 83 162 112
250 405 428 386 96 161 98
500 432 427 376 105 125 112
4
0 53 45 40 50 43 38 36 38 43 49 40 41
50 210 178 202 189 36 33 32 35 143 178 141 174
100 281 284 284 369 49 59 56 56 316 265 308 270
200 458 493 554 438 63 72 85 127 506 514 537 424
300 725 770 645 786 83 75 77 83 743 738 816 756
500 650 739 538 599 87 127 127 117 974 1032 1022 990
1000 449 362 222 210 133 135 161 188 887 1018 718 554
5
0 48 31 41 35 33 30
50 177 208 177 26 31 39
100 424 415 385 22 24 30
150 503 507 528 25 35 23
200 586 623 593 34 39 40
250 654 717 700 30 34 44
300 779 762 760 37 49 (0)*
6
0 27 27 30 16 20 23 31 33 29
25 102 120 127 22 21 22 103 93 84
50 236 243 273 28 30 31 216 196 228
75 341 360 411 29 25 24 318 306 330
100 494 475 480 26 40 26 454 431 431
150 568 623 651 39 33 38 685 683 720
200 608 612 699 32 40 38 897 886 893
400 514 573 585 62 tox 67 956 1001 1029
800 tox tox tox
7
0 34 31 30 19 16 13
25 73 88 66 18 18 19
50 129 128 145 24 19 43
75 216 190 199 25 36 30
100 261 250 255 29 30 28
125 308 360 325 50 35 30
200 333 340 366 48 44 48
8
0 20 29 22 23 22 17
25 53 56 51 18 20 25
50 163 156 146 20 25 23
75 163 175 165 27 21 21
100 273 268 266 27 28 19
125 281 271 269 21 23 21
250 303 273 278 18 25 32
500 476 435 423 62 60 56
9
0 33 22 35 24 34 35 33 22 24 29
1000 385 426 445 tox tox tox
500 475 576 577 82 99 98
250 513 460 520 58 36 53
150 354 393 330 34 70 47
100 271 300 321 30 34 27
50 238 222 237 28 37 33
25 152 127 127 36 34 22
10
0 73 51 51 28 36 38
30 105 117 85 30 36 40
60 207 184 201 51 27 48
90 290 332 276 40 30 41
120 432 421 470 47 43 56
150 470 505 482 31 35 51
180 636 537 641 34 26 29
11
0 29 19 24 20 33 32 18 20 15 23 33 19
25 107 93 101 84 61 66 18 23 10 57 43 60
50 163 138 125 106 138 162 34 23 28 70 104 103
75 223 196 241 193 208 187 28 33 33 152 123 162
100 255 252 283 250 252 223 29 27 39 167 196 198
125 334 327 326 305 260 275 33 42 47 214 223 215
250 394 408 404 336 423 433 64 61 42 372 418 445
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 18/33
Participating CSC TA98 (+S9) with 5% S9 TA98 (-S9) TA98 (+S9) with 10% S9
Laboratory (µg/mL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
12
0 16 27 19 8 7 15 13 22 10
156 48 53 41 16 12 15 34 39 45
313 72 52 64 23 37 45 56 38 63
625 116 125 117 45 28 56 171 123 109
1250 141 153 129 78 81 42 145 153 164
2500 98 81 103 74 69 91 285 236 248
5000 94 110 115 43 78 56 228 279 253
(c: Contamination, tox: Growth Inhibition, *: Plate contaminated or plate skewed, M: Missing
A-1.4 Sample B (TA100)
Participating CSC TA100 (+S9) with 5% S9 TA100 (-S9) TA100 (+S9) with 10% S9
Laboratory (µg/mL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
1
0 98 99 106
100 96 91
91 92 100
10 124 112 124
125 119 121
82 98 81
25 137 143 151
140 124 137
120 97 86
50 165 167 181
152 136 153
137 122 123
75 192 181 174
168 155 164
153 139 151
125 256 286 259
141 152 154
208 207 195
250 342 421 335
155 152 180
326 304 325
2
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
3
0 184 155 188
188 178 195
25 213 198 213
191 189 164
50 248 252 250
205 199 188
75 276 290 239
221 198 232
100 250 290 268
215 213 213
125 263 262 253
229 199 225
250 297 373 364
181 201 152
500 452 440 414
161 157 124
4
0 173 175 197 184
171 160 163 214
196 194 191 196
50 164 232 232 194
170 165 181 161
197 185 225 186
100 214 242 230 222
170 189 172 198
212 216 232 262
200 281 252 278 253
220 236 230 242
206 262 258 278
300 248 254 253 272
210 222 218 213
297 280 309 348
500 270 264 246 242
221 256 242 244
310 317 286 322
1000 254 188 234 222
325 361 338 384
340 349 309 286
5
0 94 98 95
102 94 99
50 147 156 138
118 104 115
100 266 235 231
110 115 109
150 283 271 228
125 102 126
200 312 311 306
127 117 141
250 321 329 323
125 137 133
300 356 345 358
138 142 117
6
0 92 111 90
63 77 81
93 93 75
25 125 110 145
95 105 92
142 121 142
50 151 163 167
103 116 107
131 141 138
75 167 184 176
136 114 125
171 186 171
100 215 206 191
124 140 142
193 208 192
150 228 223 170
145 122 151
261 237 247
200 247 228 224
142 133 142
326 269 272
400 224 232 233
211 227 220
329 306 312
800
tox tox tox
7
0 73 103 83
89 81 84
25 86 103 90
124 79 90
50 121 123 96
96 108 85
75 123 118 104
110 80 110
100 126 125 136
95 111 115
125 140 143 155
105 105 90
200 159 205 175
113 110 91
8
0 111 112 132
119 126 111
25 155 136 137
127 137 128
50 153 147 169
151 144 149
75 192 181 209
156 159 161
100 225 193 197
148 154 167
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 19/33
Participating CSC TA100 (+S9) with 5% S9 TA100 (-S9) TA100 (+S9) with 10% S9
Laboratory (µg/mL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
125 224 230 219
149 148 160
250 292 295 331
172 165 161
500 324 310 332
148 133 152
9
0 127 136 154 137 157
106 101 112 118 101
1000 423 38 368
tox tox tox
500 457 460 460
144 279 143
250 316 304 343
211 207 179
150 279 259 243
206 188 183
100 263 267 253
162 134 116
50 192 217 181
145 159 136
25 149 210 174
158 161 118
10
0 144 125 149
112 123 140
50 223 209 190
150 143 165
100 252 250 245
145 152 139
150 302 296 301
176 184 164
200 365 323 296
205 176 193
250 361 333 383
171 170 189
300 370 394 381
186 218 157
11
0 124 120 132 145 135 139 133 138 146
159 * 139
25 142 120 169 167 139 182 152 159 133
131 150 142
50 163 163 168 202 191 207 163 156 212
127 175 148
75 183 200 191 200 229 187 154 146 155
175 175 137
100 253 214 229 206 226 233 192 178 155
186 205 226
125 239 253 201 244 244 295 201 219 197
193 203 186
250 206 280 247 322 296 279 177 163 166
308 265 305
12
0 75 56 77
41 39 51
66 70 53
156 85 93 87
50 24 32
88 90 72
313 97 122 131
41 50 40
128 135 119
625 120 116 84
38 57 31
148 156 113
1250 117 134 105
50 56 47
167 174 149
2500 121 148 167
79 65 59
185 165 195
5000 104 108 151
81 79 95
218 222 167
(tox: Growth Inhibition, *: Plate contaminated or plate skewed)
A-1.5 Sample C (TA98)
Participating CSC TA98 (+S9) with 5% S9 TA98 (-S9) TA98 (+S9) with 10% S9
Laboratory (µg/mL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
1
0 19 18 17
13 13 8
15 22 17
10 32 35 33
9 18 18
26 39 28
25 54 47 34
22 16 19
22 34 31
50 95 72 80
26 15 18
71 53 42
75 135 106 110
26 18 28
70 86 61
125 170 141 209
29 28 21
112 111 125
250 275 216 244
27 29 32
259 229 286
2
30 32 M
30 32 M
50 103 83 102
M 29 20
100 177 165 161
11 M 18
150 197 252 241
18 12 24
200 248 257 277
12 14 26
250 277 263 322
13 13 23
300 272 315 294
22 13 17
3
0 105 112 111
83 93 68
25 180 132 148
99 96 84
50 173 156 144
111 111 89
75 176 225 176
115 80 138
100 259 254 279
134 111 124
125 227 263 257
90 86 118
250 393 310 334
105 105 148
500 308 358 320
131 164 96
4
0 49 53 54 58
39 39 28 36
35 49 47 50
50 116 121 157 116
29 35 40 36
111 100 85 96
100 294 258 265 185
28 17 29 37
178 172 149 197
200 497 404 389 393
39 49 31 31
378 317 208 334
300 583 325 384 426
49 60 72 32
169 362 406 495
500 438 469 433 414
49 45 53 47
506 639 579 529
1000 317 386 450 446
75 75 89 79
730 698 811 683
5 0 153 151 174
153 173 165
50 209 216 184
174 163 146
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 20/33
Participating CSC TA98 (+S9) with 5% S9 TA98 (-S9) TA98 (+S9) with 10% S9
Laboratory (µg/mL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
100 150 323 306
141 139 161
150 374 318 314
163 120 115
200 463 413 449
136 154 134
250 440 497 520
136 133 136
300 523 464 559
161 136 155
6
0 27 27 30
16 20 23
31 33 29
25 80 79 75
24 27 20
60 74 57
50 133 114 138
21 30 31
114 119 109
75 227 188 175
21 35 29
173 164 173
100 238 224 256
32 37 28
216 219 223
150 368 345 328
33 30 36
321 379 C
200 378 348 383
38 37 34
457 452 459
400 325 307 321
tox tox tox
578 549 572
800
tox tox tox
7
0 25 16 21
20 10 5
25 34 44 36
19 26 28
50 56 65 69
14 40 28
75 88 80 106
29 41 34
100 95 104 106
24 38 43
125 139 128 149
41 58 46
200 178 163 174
51 46 50
8
0 24 25 25
21 24 25
25 55 51 53
24 19 22
50 87 85 97
21 23 24
75 113 123 116
27 21 23
100 148 147 143
22 21 21
125 159 159 163
20 31 27
250 243 256 236
22 20 32
500 275 264 263
46 50 48
9
0 33 22 35 24 34
35 33 22 24 29
1000 206 248 206
tox tox tox
500 286 237 286
54 43 51
250 219 220 219
31 30 38
150 256 265 259
48 38 29
100 157 172 208
35 45 28
50 108 112 125
43 30 27
25 73 63 65
34 36 25
10
0 63 60 56
20 26 31
30 85 99 86
22 41 29
60 117 119 96
29 42 24
90 190 167 188
56 27 34
120 235 215 256
20 28 15
150 242 241 301
19 23 24
180 324 360 377
14 15 17
11
0 24 27 11 23 29 24 14 17 23
27 * 33
25 45 46 53 51 49 70 22 27 27
32 29 38
50 96 75 84 89 84 82 24 27 39
73 39 60
75 108 106 120 99 109 99 29 18 31
82 84 73
100 148 155 111 119 120 115 43 33 37
103 99 89
125 174 143 171 151 166 161 31 28 45
103 123 134
250 265 222 236 228 189 205 55 58 64
* 215 233
12
0 18 22 23
9 11 19
15 23 13
156 21 25 20
13 14 18
9 31 14
313 38 39 38
22 19 28
41 25 37
625 42 39 41
18 24 24
31 35 37
1250 47 28 52
40 37 71
78 58 81
2500 60 63 78
59 36 71
183 164 152
5000 74 86 108
64 100 98
95 126 117
(c: Contamination, tox: Growth Inhibition, *: Plate contaminated or plate skewed, M: Missing)
A-1.6 Sample C (TA100)
Participating CSC TA100 (+S9) with 5% S9 TA100 (-S9) TA100 (+S9) with 10% S9
Laboratory (µg/mL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
1
0 98 99 106
100 96 91
91 92 100
10 122 117 139
105 109 94
86 97 106
25 126 139 109
136 110 135
122 99 97
50 167 152 155
139 113 150
99 113 79
75 180 174 168
163 161 157
175 124 126
125 192 188 216
163 141 192
141 161 174
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 21/33
Participating CSC TA100 (+S9) with 5% S9 TA100 (-S9) TA100 (+S9) with 10% S9
Laboratory (µg/mL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
250 283 278 284
165 142 166
228 219 202
2
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
3
0 189 200 177
197 186 190
25 231 217 203
196 147 211
50 244 227 180
217 241 224
75 283 273 274
221 207 240
100 274 264 281
161 204 217
125 300 259 243
174 197 204
250 334 306 377
177 183 209
500 420 281 356
191 166 129
4
0 222 183 193 187
144 155 143 146
165 180 202 204
50 225 224 185 246
205 169 177 192
185 238 232 232
100 178 209 238 244
193 181 188 158
201 237 246 237
200 264 222 270 288
157 145 189 170
274 241 306 252
300 276 293 296 244
196 189 220 204
258 260 254 294
500 296 320 324 254
201 197 182 236
308 354 328 321
1000 274 328 318 269
289 234 266 280
360 369 340 330
5
0 235 195 209
228 215 193
50 211 203 256
203 196 230
100 270 241 239
226 220 233
150 264 287 268
232 211 222
200 284 295 312
221 218 229
250 316 306 288
227 214 184
300 345 312 345
242 220 221
6
0 92 111 90
63 77 81
93 93 75
25 106 121 139
98 119 114
104 113 110
50 159 136 134
120 83 105
129 123 137
75 166 148 131
102 95 120
125 158 159
100 192 180 192
137 124 108
177 142 150
150 189 193 184
125 130 172
191 185 203
200 181 201 194
146 132 156
244 208 191
400 206 220 189
218 215 201
320 293 290
800
tox tox tox
7
0 65 79 80
73 55 69
25 71 86 68
83 89 84
50 84 89 71
130 105 118
75 101 108 110
130 128 96
100 99 116 116
103 114 144
125 129 119 131
120 139 114
200 155 188 136
121 114 114
8
0 115 117 128
109 101 97
25 112 110 135
112 105 100
50 120 123 136
133 119 117
75 161 163 179
163 149 153
100 199 197 190
153 161 155
125 198 190 209
149 157 160
250 279 275 260
154 160 172
500 284 280 280
115 112 124
9
0 127 136 154 137 157
106 101 112 118 101
1000 385 375 394
tox tox tox
500 367 370 386
202 202 180
250 284 297 258
232 173 177
150 267 272 244
157 193 175
100 219 237 225
181 173 158
50 198 191 195
153 154 121
25 131 177 164
107 154 148
10
0 156 157 148
140 115 130
50 191 211 184
170 177 204
100 252 244 201
182 208 197
150 270 260 253
231 216 247
200 308 292 321
241 238 208
250 344 324 312
294 254 244
300 370 357 334
262 255 262
11 0 138 125 122 140 111 * 120 127 160
138 146 115
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 22/33
Participating CSC TA100 (+S9) with 5% S9 TA100 (-S9) TA100 (+S9) with 10% S9
Laboratory (µg/mL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
25 133 147 147 137 156 156 164 111 127
159 127 150
50 145 143 157 170 165 183 147 151 171
119 127 129
75 207 191 200 220 158 167 187 170 184
168 148 154
100 200 188 188 191 159 169 215 173 183
194 161 183
125 193 209 177 229 224 186 218 218 154
177 197 160
250 230 266 244 249 265 242 161 150 161
283 246 241
12
0 59 81 66
43 40 38
67 73 49
156 76 63 72
58 54 60
57 74 81
313 79 73 88
67 61 43
83 69 97
625 91 88 102
79 67 47
73 76 80
1250 98 96 95
76 71 66
88 86 77
2500 83 94 121
73 71 70
111 103 86
5000 116 86 85
74 79 85
108 117 121
(tox: Growth Inhibition, *: Plate contaminated or plate skewed, M: Missing)
A-1.7 Sample D (TA98)
Participating CSC TA98 (+S9) with 5% S9 TA98 (-S9) TA98 (+S9) with 10% S9
Laboratory (µg/mL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
1
0 19 18 17
13 13 8
15 22 17
10 33 48 42
8 9 8
22 20 26
25 84 84 71
17 27 19
43 47 48
50 190 143 174
18 29 16
120 82 92
75 289 252 242
33 20 26
154 169 196
125 392 425 425
29 34 18
288 272 256
250 623 524 434
39 43 28
529 459 584
2
30 32 M
30 32 M
50 161 171 180
M M 4
100 304 315 395
9 M M
150 370 359 359
19 15 10
200 432 392 507
10 29 18
250 422 414 453
19 18 15
300 372 457 448
19 12 19
3
0 48 37 35
42 35 29
25 119 135 143
65 46 57
50 155 201 157
77 51 57
75 216 249 217
78 36 52
100 272 236 252
46 64 62
125 301 296 200
62 77 59
250 304 293 168
74 68 74
500 313 374 332
64 65 67
4
0 49 53 54 58
39 39 28 36
35 49 47 50
50 206 293 174 176
39 47 41 41
198 160 136 166
100 356 329 297 336
44 43 41 63
388 364 368 401
200 683 547 429 318
53 47 51 43
711 625 735 325
300 976 819 654 951
75 76 71 76
819 842 746 601
500 814 503 546 509
75 73 76 87
803 1003 1201 855
1000 661 521 501 C
115 105 108 91
1137 903 806 M
5
0 29 34 31
38 31 23
50 130 116 170
44 31 28
100 365 269 400
35 35 33
150 502 412 452
29 38 37
200 561 610 578
37 36 31
250 682 598 640
70 31 27
300 619 681 733
42 33 34
6
0 27 27 30
16 20 23
31 33 29
25 113 129 119
25 19 27
79 92 81
50 275 255 247
23 33 21
187 181 200
75 376 347 443
31 28 25
302 318 334
100 522 509 505
27 20 25
450 463 442
150 605 593 605
34 42 39
709 707 742
200 622 602 668
37 35 40
840 843 835
400 542 594 579
80 75 63
998 984 1029
800
tox tox tox
7
0 25 16 21
20 10 5
25 51 59 50
21 20 26
50 98 111 115
25 29 23
75 140 148 166
26 41 45
100 160 200 186
38 30 45
125 234 169 215
34 39 50
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 23/33
Participating CSC TA98 (+S9) with 5% S9 TA98 (-S9) TA98 (+S9) with 10% S9
Laboratory (µg/mL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
200 273 279 236
49 53 59
8
0 36 35 33
19 22 21
25 67 55 64
21 20 25
50 144 152 149
20 25 21
75 199 209 221
24 21 19
100 276 275 283
25 29 20
125 267 291 288
20 27 27
250 373 392 372
27 28 35
500 377 431 373
65 73 85
9
0 33 22 35 24 34
35 33 22 24 29
1000 449 447 492
tox tox tox
500 517 509 476
55 48 37
250 451 528 537
49 49 49
150 460 420 430
40 35 42
100 328 318 348
26 33 26
50 240 177 172
29 24 31
25 109 104 102
33 24 31
10
0 63 60 56
20 26 31
30 111 113 125
30 41 51
60 179 198 174
36 26 47
90 327 285 296
43 39 36
120 435 414 442
22 25 26
150 510 517 498
25 24 24
180 593 626 575
21 19 21
11
0 20 15 28 25 27 28 24 22 27
27 * 23
25 92 82 84 75 77 67 20 22 28
43 49 35
50 132 173 177 132 165 128 19 33 20
80 86 92
75 192 252 222 186 184 191 22 28 31
111 138 109
100 211 248 253 218 234 231 36 29 32
165 181 191
125 350 308 349 252 281 246 34 32 39
233 181 195
250 408 576 507 342 329 386 48 69 43
436 421 417
12
0 18 22 23
9 11 19
15 23 13
156 35 35 28
15 19 31
40 38 48
313 25 69 50
25 19 42
48 53 40
625 67 46 67
33 23 45
57 51 41
1250 82 46 62
32 47 33
95 146 100
2500 108 100 91
36 35 54
64 99 60
5000 86 80 96
44 53 77
162 54 35
(c: Contamination, tox: Growth Inhibition, *: Plate contaminated or plate skewed, M: Missing
A-1.8 Sample D (TA100)
Participating CSC TA100 (+S9) with 5% S9 TA100 (-S9) TA100 (+S9) with 10% S9
Laboratory (µg/mL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
1
0 98 99 106
100 96 91
91 92 100
10 106 113 135
112 140 138
100 93 109
25 120 135 148
120 154 149
92 124 84
50 157 164 174
125 143 108
155 142 136
75 195 205 200
156 141 165
149 153 169
125 270 277 285
149 162 154
205 217 209
250 364 365 376
162 183 181
318 331 296
2
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
3
0 135 136 123
116 113 111
25 175 209 218
193 159 181
50 228 181 196
199 190 218
75 221 215 235
189 177 184
100 206 247 331
237 199 199
125 230 216 241
181 202 224
250 268 269 254
203 202 164
500 306 339 338
117 130 135
4
0 222 183 193 187
144 155 143 146
165 180 202 204
50 201 241 241 241
182 160 192 160
248 218 214 221
100 270 273 264 269
161 166 204 164
226 204 245 213
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 24/33
Participating CSC TA100 (+S9) with 5% S9 TA100 (-S9) TA100 (+S9) with 10% S9
Laboratory (µg/mL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
200 304 288 280 301
172 156 173 162
281 276 256 252
300 340 317 317 214
174 176 181 194
318 262 365 370
500 324 301 341 228
192 176 189 182
420 368 410 384
1000 336 296 340 358
209 218 229 244
413 378 374 366
5
0 80 114 84
97 94 80
50 126 113 134
101 114 114
100 185 158 206
118 120 130
150 198 139 212
116 131 85
200 229 209 207
135 109 96
250 243 224 305
122 143 118
300 280 279 285
125 106 129
6
0 92 111 90
63 77 81
93 93 75
25 111 123 129
114 92 83
124 115 116
50 189 160 171
93 110 107
153 153 149
75 169 170 167
96 97 115
189 196 196
100 197 193 189
118 118 103
206 211 164
150 222 190 224
135 131 119
236 225 228
200 217 223 241
124 138 127
269 249 275
400 247 225 247
177 206 186
321 351 312
800
tox tox tox
7
0 65 79 80
73 55 69
25 61 68 88
94 95 89
50 88 93 99
113 91 100
75 105 98 130
111 90 130
100 126 123 113
136 130 130
125 143 141 143
144 131 141
200 170 158 195
129 121 140
8
0 133 129 136
112 117 121
25 142 139 133
111 118 127
50 143 145 141
123 139 133
75 157 176 183
137 140 133
100 211 199 223
141 143 155
125 252 255 287
134 135 147
250 291 328 308
136 148 141
500 319 356 343
141 145 160
9
0 127 136 154 137 157
106 101 112 118 101
1000 414 453 455
tox tox tox
500 393 434 380
197 150 186
250 373 327 325
191 222 212
150 274 286 312
179 174 175
100 209 270 265
142 144 133
50 202 191 188
161 176 138
25 161 174 144
142 135 129
10
0 136 149 170
140 115 130
50 224 228 222
184 176 180
100 306 287 253
206 215 201
150 352 337 321
213 186 218
200 382 347 367
220 221 232
250 406 427 418
221 210 217
300 231 357 406
250 211 258
11
0 110 134 100 139 103 146 115 122 138
120 155 129
25 132 132 125 125 153 131 160 155 145
157 136 146
50 183 171 154 163 162 179 159 193 188
177 179 187
75 175 196 178 225 206 219 171 157 169
170 173 168
100 223 233 169 193 233 267 169 173 205
205 201 183
125 212 223 223 233 219 271 203 196 188
246 233 212
250 281 287 246 289 259 296 134 175 187
322 299 321
12
0 59 81 66
43 40 38
67 73 49
156 115 105 108
27 55 31
94 106 140
313 125 145 97
25 38 48
132 162 111
625 151 140 119
49 42 40
119 124 144
1250 109 113 112
80 84 112
137 98 114
2500 152 134 144
91 96 95
123 182 165
5000 108 113 135
111 96 102
185 219 195
(tox: Growth Inhibition)
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 25/33
A-1.9 Sample E (TA98)
Participating CSC TA98 (+S9) with 5% S9 TA98 (-S9) TA98 (+S9) with 10% S9
Laboratory (µg/mL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
1
0 19 18 17
13 13 8
15 22 17
10 31 30 32
17 17 26
18 20 19
25 30 33 53
16 17 18
15 22 29
50 107 84 99
19 27 26
56 66 44
75 104 92 74
31 27 19
61 68 59
125 163 141 125
19 22 29
125 99 119
250 286 253 277
29 27 40
231 220 245
2
30 32 M
30 32 M
50 113 98 91
52 M 6
100 151 137 167
18 11 3
150 257 258 244
13 17 13
200 277 232 272
15 15 14
250 233 253 267
22 19 25
300 264 264 292
25 13 18
3
0 48 37 35
44 40 67
25 101 82 75
41 45 45
50 116 107 118
57 53 69
75 181 140 151
85 73 51
100 175 161 177
86 75 56
125 161 164 151
42 94 101
250 208 195 196
78 82 76
500 211 222 186
72 51 66
4
0 49 53 54 58
39 39 28 36
35 49 47 50
50 131 112 109 140
40 41 36 45
129 124 105 95
100 244 150 174 158
44 48 43 40
196 164 161 161
200 238 262 325 241
41 32 51 51
297 237 230 261
300 542 409 313 420
75 47 56 57
C 397 462 416
500 382 396 369 329
85 48 73 68
577 746 618 525
1000 365 349 336 269
93 117 91 107
788 847 776 834
5
0 40 34 36
25 44 38
50 93 80 83
32 38 29
100 154 147 105
40 23 43
150 231 172 183
35 29 30
200 275 281 240
39 48 36
250 345 271 306
33 31 46
300 350 311 340
46 54 57
6
0 27 27 30
16 20 23
31 33 29
25 74 66 67
28 18 20
59 56 59
50 146 123 118
18 25 25
102 67 97
75 181 181 199
31 15 31
137 140 152
100 232 239 215
28 26 30
167 168 177
150 293 337 320
31 36 29
299 283 323
200 335 366 353
46 41 41
402 393 415
400 401 333 338
55 58 55
545 553 555
800
23 12 23
7
0 18 30 19
10 21 15
25 43 39 50
23 18 8
50 53 48 64
19 20 14
75 89 86 78
16 18 25
100 149 128 161
29 25 29
125 165 160 160
26 30 18
200 233 276 211
20 30 26
8
0 33 35 24
20 19 20
25 39 31 33
27 25 23
50 69 67 63
18 23 25
75 72 73 73
43 20 19
100 121 113 111
28 27 24
125 139 148 145
21 22 28
250 227 220 194
35 25 29
500 227 220 203
45 56 48
9
0 33 22 35 24 34
35 33 22 24 29
1000 172 236 219
60 71 67
500 283 243 271
44 34 60
250 228 274 271
51 35 30
150 232 237 244
29 39 27
100 152 184 153
31 43 13
50 112 100 102
28 26 20
25 76 69 60
29 26 20
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 26/33
Participating CSC TA98 (+S9) with 5% S9 TA98 (-S9) TA98 (+S9) with 10% S9
Laboratory (µg/mL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
10
0 61 52 66
53 48 52
30 75 86 80
50 58 64
60 102 106 106
56 34 51
90 155 164 155
53 64 49
120 175 195 208
44 48 50
150 249 241 240
39 28 42
180 310 321 301
52 49 48
11
0 22 29 29 19 19 29 19 23 25
23 22 23
25 70 38 46 39 48 42 28 31 19
34 28 33
50 69 75 82 70 63 68 41 19 17
54 53 42
75 120 83 135 101 92 122 25 24 20
67 63 58
100 130 134 148 137 129 113 33 24 39
95 87 82
125 173 136 173 157 128 182 32 38 27
94 92 123
250 243 283 294 217 222 223 42 38 50
174 184 174
12
0 17 29 15
7 9 21
23 18 21
156 59 29 29
22 25 20
49 26 48
313 52 42 31
60 34 26
45 45 40
625 53 58 69
64 64 85
56 57 55
1250 112 53 72
82 77 86
70 61 58
2500 135 137 138
235 198 190
109 81 87
5000 77 102 85
61 97 43
153 188 148
(c: Contamination, M: Missing)
A-1.10 Sample E (TA100)
Participating CSC TA100 (+S9) with 5% S9 TA100 (-S9) TA100 (+S9) with 10% S9
Laboratory (µg/mL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
1
0 98 99 106
100 96 91
91 92 100
10 111 95 143
98 121 150
100 95 109
25 110 149 120
137 144 124
100 95 111
50 126 144 135
109 118 111
113 125 106
75 166 179 174
164 123 150
141 144 139
125 193 215 176
138 144 136
148 154 162
250 235 257 260
152 157 140
188 204 189
2
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
3
0 135 136 123
125 122 126
25 161 143 232
154 172 165
50 172 199 175
180 154 180
75 200 190 158
152 168 167
100 217 223 236
201 180 226
125 249 229 191
190 178 191
250 259 228 270
154 167 165
500 243 290 296
120 141 148
4
0 222 183 193 187
144 155 143 146
165 180 202 204
50 272 238 208 240
193 162 164 197
224 190 216 193
100 221 213 248 208
158 198 166 170
197 192 158 204
200 266 236 289 234
178 194 190 153
224 177 166 173
300 292 253 269 286
226 205 181 193
213 258 290 285
500 276 269 276 268
188 194 221 257
300 249 314 262
1000 262 233 260 265
258 253 241 241
298 314 302 281
5
0 79 97 109
99 101 102
50 116 115 92
100 77 95
100 114 134 162
98 129 138
150 157 187 185
110 96 136
200 163 201 205
122 121 115
250 179 227 182
124 135 144
300 232 216 176
131 106 145
6
0 92 111 90
63 77 81
93 93 75
25 116 111 108
103 101 90
133 123 107
50 127 C 114
115 113 103
121 133 145
75 143 128 136
93 79 95
133 134 147
100 145 147 143
153 132 104
157 132 155
150 183 201 180
116 124 121
193 198 168
200 200 190 185
106 148 129
205 195 190
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 27/33
Participating CSC TA100 (+S9) with 5% S9 TA100 (-S9) TA100 (+S9) with 10% S9
Laboratory (µg/mL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
400 251 221 237
177 187 179
273 230 237
800
192 242 183
7
0 106 104 110
96 110 123
25 101 135 84
136 130 84
50 104 103 99
116 125 114
75 119 118 101
144 94 140
100 155 135 161
139 141 119
125 149 161 151
141 145 118
200 203 173 171
135 150 120
8
0 125 109 108
127 121 123
25 128 123 127
130 134 140
50 172 152 171
144 153 140
75 169 177 185
156 140 156
100 204 171 179
152 160 147
125 216 192 184
151 152 160
250 214 199 219
168 179 163
500 315 317 308
123 119 132
9
0 127 136 154 137 157
106 101 112 118 101
1000 302 327 320
tox tox tox
500 335 338 335
231 192 220
250 229 217 239
155 152 150
150 264 276 297
133 199 161
100 241 192 203
130 154 142
50 167 189 168
140 127 133
25 181 146 150
139 110 144
10
0 198 184 176
220 150 214
50 188 259 282
217 192 173
100 183 280 287
187 213 204
150 193 280 289
231 196 201
200 244 241 347
200 237 432
250 237 262 294
271 243 245
300 234 265 344
263 262 267
11
0 118 132 109 131 104 146 138 127 116
138 127 116
25 154 151 125 139 125 159 177 154 143
177 154 143
50 136 131 155 160 181 169 156 127 151
156 127 151
75 128 147 148 209 205 197 165 166 147
165 166 147
100 179 192 174 188 196 205 147 155 151
147 155 151
125 184 175 186 209 151 221 171 191 173
171 191 173
250 238 225 237 239 233 254 267 258 257
267 258 257
12
0 93 55 67
33 52 47
65 73 61
156 79 108 124
76 87 108
119 92 116
313 102 98 114
92 83 74
143 142 149
625 107 104 109
81 67 77
142 129 127
1250 139 124 148
81 82 64
153 114 126
2500 112 117 143
100 76 97
151 142 125
5000 153 125 140
63 68 92
128 109 129
(tox: Growth Inhibition, *: Plate contaminated or plate skewed)
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 28/33
A-1.11 Sample F (TA98)
Participating CSC TA98 (+S9) with 5% S9 TA98 (-S9) TA98 (+S9) with 10% S9
Laboratory (µg/mL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
1
0 19 18 17 13 13 8 15 22 17
10 48 40 20 21 14 15 35 29 34
25 100 92 73 16 21 13 39 47 60
50 187 208 191 17 27 18 117 105 84
75 231 276 272 28 18 30 205 180 201
125 339 363 433 29 31 20 309 310 326
250 583 605 461 33 40 31 566 500 573
2
30 32 M 30 32 M
50 163 154 199 23 3 5
100 331 255 318 19 M 8
150 407 464 438 28 8 16
200 438 494 461 11 17 17
250 424 446 433 19 12 16
300 451 522 551 21 15 19
3
0 49 65 42 51 32 45
25 104 94 141 46 67 45
50 136 152 128 38 65 45
75 181 164 220 45 48 30
100 254 222 188 36 52 67
125 297 301 304 na 71 59
250 241 207 339 81 57 77
500 257 252 262 71 80 57
4
0 49 53 54 58 39 39 28 36 35 49 47 50
50 213 212 205 154 57 56 48 49 157 178 149 153
100 479 390 426 393 49 47 39 C 372 385 384 402
200 567 625 590 M 59 52 49 83 649 699 629 436
300 1064 944 847 702 69 57 77 51 1047 1112 967 1004
500 888 634 771 707 85 69 48 68 1272 899 1147 1247
1000 686 461 470 517 111 105 92 127 1345 1208 1135 1235
5
0 30 28 34 28 26 22
50 155 176 201 35 23 33
100 330 340 182 30 32 44
150 472 472 472 32 44 32
200 506 576 582 31 43 38
250 561 583 632 27 25 46
300 576 565 780 36 49 43
6
0 27 27 30 16 20 23 31 33 29
25 123 148 121 22 20 24 104 102 94
50 241 270 254 21 39 23 199 197 198
75 392 338 357 33 30 40 359 316 337
100 486 472 529 18 28 29 469 466 480
150 604 641 651 34 28 37 667 701 583
200 662 659 707 39 32 33 855 778 824
400 528 511 570 76 tox 54 1019 982 1053
800 tox tox tox
7
0 18 30 19 10 21 15
25 78 70 88 15 15 13
50 106 120 90 24 21 23
75 166 148 146 18 24 23
100 183 178 209 30 19 21
125 204 199 248 44 31 33
200 308 301 303 31 48 39
8
0 29 36 29 20 22 19
25 71 75 72 23 20 20
50 89 88 110 20 20 21
75 185 193 220 21 22 27
100 233 229 215 28 23 20
125 321 298 295 29 27 29
250 360 339 327 48 36 49
500 412 404 396 80 64 66
9
0 33 22 35 24 34 35 33 22 24 29
1000 462 492 469 57 56 75
500 454 533 531 54 46 49
250 458 439 432 45 29 43
150 443 489 493 26 35 47
100 371 350 378 31 35 35
50 215 212 186 25 47 24
25 118 115 125 29 38 20
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 29/33
Participating CSC TA98 (+S9) with 5% S9 TA98 (-S9) TA98 (+S9) with 10% S9
Laboratory (µg/mL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
10
0 61 52 66 53 48 52
30 109 117 105 48 46 41
60 194 202 177 37 48 43
90 264 297 356 54 58 56
120 426 382 362 42 38 48
150 476 468 534 30 47 35
180 557 511 672 38 27 36
11
0 15 20 20 20 23 15 20 11 19 35 19 14
25 125 87 106 77 56 81 24 19 19 52 38 46
50 168 139 160 129 143 139 42 41 42 80 86 73
75 201 224 231 204 162 179 34 33 51 105 115 119
100 285 261 320 206 233 258 39 37 36 147 132 186
125 345 350 281 275 339 281 27 37 34 210 206 223
250 429 394 339 447 342 394 60 43 45 415 398 339
12
0 17 29 15 7 9 21 23 18 21
156 42 35 50 18 17 24 32 43 48
313 48 84 54 21 12 26 77 54 40
625 76 95 76 31 35 21 100 67 102
1250 82 94 107 46 27 31 161 120 161
2500 117 147 150 57 51 43 273 83 129
5000 118 70 61 63 61 62 161 202 125
(c: Contamination, tox: Growth Inhibition, M: Missing)
A-1.12 Sample F (TA100)
Participating CSC TA100 (+S9) with 5% S9 TA100 (-S9) TA100 (+S9) with 10% S9
Laboratory (µg/mL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
1
0 98 99 106
100 96 91
91 92 100
10 111 138 113
113 120 138
109 111 104
25 141 108 123
111 135 123
110 107 92
50 163 169 135
120 164 164
144 142 124
75 234 187 169
178 181 135
177 193 156
125 272 305 248
178 174 216
206 178 230
250 309 313 362
219 216 227
337 344 315
2
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
3
0 135 136 123
97 135 136
25 109 123 145
125 141 117
50 145 152 117
120 128 96
75 167 157 178
123 159 145
100 143 158 203
159 149 203
125 167 157 167
204 158 152
250 170 183 151
136 125 133
500 199 220 232
123 97 97
4
0 222 183 193 187
144 155 143 146
165 180 202 204
50 229 248 228 201
200 185 197 184
210 213 216 205
100 234 254 240 233
182 212 161 178
221 204 249 213
200 285 296 289 302
160 204 180 176
284 290 286 274
300 286 268 340 318
198 200 233 230
344 380 324 318
500 325 326 334 342
233 205 188 201
393 444 410 421
1000 325 286 241 272
220 221 218 246
430 418 438 349
5
0 113 92 74
93 77 94
50 90 134 84
93 100 108
100 166 164 157
115 120 129
150 221 205 239
133 100 104
200 233 242 273
111 132 124
250 234 224 288
100 92 98
300 246 201 287
107 102 117
6
0 92 111 90
63 77 81
93 93 75
25 133 135 149
84 94 121
116 111 108
50 181 146 162
103 115 98
144 126 135
75 179 181 147
111 114 101
190 167 163
100 214 206 202
112 96 102
193 174 183
150 253 277 235
124 129 163
255 244 244
200 223 211 217
129 145 121
336 263 311
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 30/33
Participating CSC TA100 (+S9) with 5% S9 TA100 (-S9) TA100 (+S9) with 10% S9
Laboratory (µg/mL) 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
400 250 241 241
228 182 202
340 373 337
800
tox 186 tox
7
0 106 104 110
96 110 123
25 78 108 94
121 105 100
50 99 129 105
90 106 65
75 144 140 123
135 126 114
100 143 159 129
125 124 136
125 178 155 173
161 131 144
200 218 186 179
219 169 159
8
0 143 137 133
116 132 127
25 141 160 143
126 133 140
50 171 167 155
130 135 141
75 185 179 200
149 154 144
100 225 216 205
131 129 134
125 236 235 233
143 154 161
250 279 276 251
187 190 196
500 339 332 331
124 119 131
9
0 127 136 154 137 157
106 101 112 118 101
1000 367 356 386
tox tox tox
500 386 375 368
171 192 170
250 320 322 300
180 183 195
150 275 246 254
163 150 164
100 238 254 243
157 163 152
50 182 228 194
154 171 155
25 146 140 135
146 161 127
10
0 198 184 176
220 150 214
50 231 224 207
178 165 176
100 250 287 313
212 192 213
150 358 330 320
218 213 214
200 434 371 393
217 243 231
250 403 408 414
223 218 232
300 432 425 411
213 226 253
11
0 141 145 127 122 122 127 118 123 119
150 132 *
25 143 155 161 189 174 159 159 152 151
132 161 146
50 174 165 150 177 175 160 160 193 169
165 168 166
75 201 193 177 188 210 175 178 182 188
155 161 183
100 226 214 211 230 210 207 178 175 171
184 203 182
125 223 244 261 253 233 282 207 206 174
239 206 284
250 302 287 280 343 355 333 129 142 148
288 334 291
12
0 93 55 67
33 52 47
65 73 61
156 95 101 97
15 27 39
142 123 118
313 111 123 109
51 34 98
74 80 124
625 99 116 101
52 61 49
119 133 114
1250 131 140 109
64 61 59
117 101 109
2500 121 105 113
78 82 57
154 161 147
5000 108 91 148
127 216 87
83 114 114
(tox: Growth Inhibition, *: Plate contaminated or plate skewed)
A-1.13 Positive Control
TA98 TA100
Rep.
Positive Control Revertant/Plate Positive Control Revertant/Plate
S9 Lab# No. Chemical µg/plate 1 2 3 4 Chemical µg/plate 1 2 3 4
5% 1
1 Benzo[a]pyrene 1 370 374 424
Benzo[ a ]pyrene 1 770 862 865
S9 1 2-aminoanthracene 1 1204 1379 1514
2 1 not stated
not stated
2877 3154 2828 2519
3
1
Benzo[a]pyrene 2.5
582 508 499
2-nitrofluorene 1
1630 1574 1525
2 542 639 599
1618 1622 1680
3 614 590 531
1633 1807 1942
4 442 507 561
1920 1930 1862
5 493 525 484
1832 1936 1973
6 564 558 557
1822 1741 1968
4 1
Benzo[a]pyrene 100
µg/mL
148 216 204 208 2-aminoanthracene
50 µg/mL
3673 3765 3497 3121
2 440 542 509 526 5088 5136 4903 4973
5
1
Benzo[a]pyrene 1
511 480 562
2-aminoanthracene
5
612 655 695
2 241 199 211
361 384 442
3 323 281 289
423 343 440
4 146 102 179
251 316 247
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 31/33
TA98 TA100
Rep.
Positive Control Revertant/Plate Positive Control Revertant/Plate
S9 Lab# No. Chemical µg/plate 1 2 3 4 Chemical µg/plate 1 2 3 4
5 124 133 254
191 224 280
6 31 31 34
292 285 446
6 1 Benzo[a]pyrene 5 471 454 447
Benzo[a]pyrene 5 658 661 694
7
1
2-aminoanthracene 2
1515 1534 1455 2-
aminoanthracene 2
1005 1201 1101
2 1419 1399 1308
1755 1660 1479
3 1121 1237 1274
1567 1524 1554
8 1
2-aminoanthracene 2 1110 1130 1240
2-aminoanthracene
2 1600 1620 1730
2 1520 1410 1490
9 1 2-aminoanthracene 2.5 3595 3456 3594
Sodium Azide 1.5 3495 3308 3273
10
1
2-aminoanthracene 2
1150 1008 1067 2-
aminoanthracene 2
1109 1035 1057
2 1168 1372 1281
1684 1533 1529
3 1094 1178 1235
1136 1273 1177
12
1
not stated not
stated
196 147 132
not stated not
stated
936 495 873
2 142 133 154
976 573 835
3 197 142 156
502 864 927
0
1 1 2-nitrofluorene 1 567 605 740
Sodium Azide 1 639 706 680
3
1
Benzo[a]pyrene 2.5
390 407 330
Sodium Azide 2
1693 1092 1041
2 402 412 396
1168 1101 1199
3 445 385 432
1186 1142 1136
4 567 674 603
1123 1075 989
5 585 575 531
883 1091 1106
6 491 487 490
1087 1058 1139
4 1
2-nitrofluorene 50
µg/mL
1366 1251 1851 2159 Sodium Azide
20 µg/mL
1059 1229 1167 1207
2 2628 2006 2975 C 1346 1139 1196 1300
5
1
2-nitrofluorene 5
1117 1033 1149
Sodium Azide 2
2717 2875 2906
2 1339 1176 1191
2391 2367 2459
3 1221 1093 1268
2303 2036 2094
4 951 610 757
2408 2429 2623
5 707 741 682
2427 2667 2774
6 856 805 673
2356 2647 2454
6 1
2-(2-furyl)-3-(5-nitro- 0.1 861 832 919
2-(2-furyl)-3-(5-nitro- 0.01 403 438 453
2-furyl)acrylamide 2-furyl)acrylamide
7
1 4-nitroquinoline-
2
304 309 376
Sodium Azide 1
514 548 568
2 1-oxide 423 421 396
400 525 536
3
531 523 509
476 461 504
8 1 2-nitrofluorene 4 704 740 709
Sodium Azide 1 541 557 506
9 1 2-nitrofluorene 5 580 732 653
2-aminoanthracene
5 704 666 701
10
1
2-nitrofluorene 4
230 330 275
Sodium Azide 1
486 420 460
2 316 312 332
461 511 535
3 419 323 338
504 528 507
12
1
not stated not
stated
3012 1976 2351
not stated not
stated
1632 2357 1938
2 1354 1979 1538
2057 1983 1316
3 1136 2153 1877
2355 1936 1512
+10% S9
1 1 Benzo[a]pyrene 1 155 178 153
Benzo[ a ]pyrene 1 504 496 645
1 2-aminoanthracene 1 755 795 819
4 1
Benzo[a]pyrene 100
µg/mL
352 470 360 249 2-aminoanthracene
50 µg/mL
3190 2898 3006 2929
2 674 678 727 742 2345 2341 2222 2656
6 1 Benzo[a]pyrene 5 480 509 508
Benzo[a]pyrene 5 635 653 652
12
1
not stated not
stated
157 130 186
not stated not
stated
876 587 896
2 175 129 168
897 676 885
3 161 129 178
897 573 881
(c: Contamination)
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 32/33
Appendix B – Calculated Specific Activities (revertants/mg
NFDPM)
B-1 Canadian Monitor 8 (CM8)
LAB Sample TA98 TA98 TA100 TA100 TA98 TA100
# Name +S9 (5%) +S9 (10%) +S9 (5%) +S9 (10%) -S9 (5%) -S9 (5%)
1 A 1418 1084 937 633 82 396
1 C 1434 1088 861 580 125 948
1 E 1256 1106 941 511 81 333
Average 1369 1093 913 575 96 559
Std. Dev. 99 12 45 61 25 339
2 A 1704 0
2 C 1527 0
2 E 1820 0
Average 1684 0
Std. Dev. 147 0
3 A 1117 448 0 0
3 C 1390 810 142 0
3 E 1283 862 172 600
Average 1263 707 104 200
Std. Dev. 137 226 92 346
4 A 1458 1575 382 165 258 297
4 C 1531 1252 347 301 45 101
4 E 1475 1522 314 228 83 148
Average 1488 1450 348 231 129 182
Std. Dev. 38 174 34 68 114 102
5 A 1673 739 0 163
5 C 1580 454 0 0
5 E 1406 570 57 149
Average 1553 588 19 104
Std. Dev. 136 144 33 90
6 A 2435 2660 619 693 126 348
6 C 2165 2501 634 784 78 312
6 E 2077 2408 579 738 108 236
Average 2226 2523 611 738 104 298
Std. Dev. 186 127 29 46 24 57
7 A 1289 467 70 128
7 C 1056 522 210 520
7 E 1485 548 76 261
Average 1276 512 119 303
Std. Dev. 215 42 79 200
8 A 1555 655 57 302
8 C 1285 868 0 586
8 E 1172 870 0 307
Average 1338 798 19 398
Std. Dev. 196 124 33 162
9 A 1774 968 74 592
9 C 1740 924 40 521
9 E 1716 1102 51 428
Average 1743 998 55 514
Std. Dev. 29 93 17 82
10 A 2004 704 0 288
10 C 1834 802 0 480
10 E 1749 359 0 313
Average 1862 621 0 360
Std. Dev. 130 233 0 104
11 A 1268 972 682 527 159 546
11 C 1225 921 672 588 176 650
11 E 1381 803 689 626 106 360
Average 1291 899 681 580 147 519
Std. Dev. 81 87 9 50 37 147
IVT-077-CTR Ames Assay Proficiency Study – March 2016 33/33
B-2 Kentucky Reference 3R4F (3R4F)
LAB Sample TA98 TA98 TA100 TA100 TA98 TA100
# Name +S9 (5%) +S9 (10%) +S9 (5%) +S9 (10%) -S9 (5%) -S9 (5%)
1 B 3317 2460 1361 1030 158 866
1 D 3823 2456 1633 1069 117 622
1 F 3386 2480 1550 1080 96 947
Average 3509 2465 1515 1059 123 812
Std. Dev. 275 13 140 26 31 169
2 B 2655 0
2 D 2676 0
2 F 3035 0
Average 2789 0
Std. Dev. 214 0
3 B 1820 776 0 338
3 D 2084 932 131 711
3 F 2091 411 126 516
Average 1998 706 86 521
Std. Dev. 155 267 74 187
4 B 2405 2592 455 252 192 159
4 D 2950 2829 566 478 135 64
4 F 3079 3656 532 525 86 109
Average 2812 3026 518 418 138 111
Std. Dev. 358 559 57 146 53 47
5 B 3164 1186 37 142
5 D 3346 716 0 0
5 F 3036 975 48 181
Average 3182 959 28 108
Std. Dev. 155 236 25 95
6 B 4657 4901 1047 1129 89 323
6 D 4945 5162 953 1127 92 263
6 F 4668 4653 997 1201 69 295
Average 4757 4906 999 1152 83 294
Std. Dev. 163 255 47 42 12 30
7 B 2630 519 168 0
7 D 1826 640 236 386
7 F 1751 586 151 462
Average 2069 581 185 283
Std. Dev. 487 61 45 248
8 B 2388 944 0 320
8 D 2620 1222 44 267
8 F 2493 918 113 190
Average 2500 1028 52 259
Std. Dev. 116 169 57 65
9 B 2385 932 138 489
9 D 3254 1201 97 446
9 F 3424 983 47 353
Average 3021 1039 94 429
Std. Dev. 557 143 46 70
10 B 3450 945 113 219
10 D 3710 1214 0 356
10 F 3398 1098 0 190
Average 3520 1086 38 255
Std. Dev. 167 135 65 89
11 B 2454 1720 1006 682 173 486
11 D 2533 1933 1120 855 148 574
11 F 2629 1687 1002 790 123 580
Average 2538 1780 1043 776 148 547
Std. Dev. 88 133 67 88 25 52