17
Technology and Policy Pathways to Net-zero Heavy Industry Dr. Chris Bataille Ins$tut du Développement Durable et des Rela$ons Interna$onales (IDDRI.org) April 30 th , 2020

Technology and Policy Pathways to Net-zero Heavy Industry

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Technology and Policy Pathways to Net-zero Heavy Industry

Technology and Policy Pathways to Net-zero Heavy Industry

Dr. Chris BatailleIns$tut du Développement Durable et des Rela$ons

Interna$onales (IDDRI.org)April 30th, 2020

Page 2: Technology and Policy Pathways to Net-zero Heavy Industry

The global carbon budgets for +1.5-20C and the implications for heavy industry

2ºC1.5ºC

Paris NDC pledges

Current trajectory

Page 3: Technology and Policy Pathways to Net-zero Heavy Industry

3

~2ºC

The cost of negative emissions ~$100-300/t CO2e, biomass or

direct air capture with CCS, if it’s available

~1.5ºC

Page 4: Technology and Policy Pathways to Net-zero Heavy Industry

While much of industry can be electrified,there are big sector specific challenges

• The “extract-use-throw away” model for most material use (steel & aluminum as excep;ons)

•Maxed out thermodynamic efficiency of core technologies (but not systems)

• Low (<=250ºC), medium (250-1000ºC) & high (>1000ºC) process heat

• Steel iron ore “deoxidiza;on” CO2 process emissions (& mel;ng heat)

• Cement lime calcina;on CO2 process GHGs (and 850/1450ºC process heat)

• Hydrogen produc;on for ammonia for fer;lizers and other chemicals; coal & steam methane reforming CO2 process emissions

• Non-ferrous metals & alloys (big progress in bauxite electrolysis, i.e. Elysis)

• Carbon feedstock needed for chemicals

•Making sure new materials aren’t GHG combus6on or process intense!

Page 5: Technology and Policy Pathways to Net-zero Heavy Industry

New literature has shown there are emerging and near commercial options to

decarbonize all industrial sectors

Source: “A review of technology and policy deep decarbonization pathway options for making energy-intensive industry production consistent with the Paris agreement”, Bataille et al (2018) Journal of Cleaner Production

5

Material efficiency & circular economy:Reduce, substitute,reuse, recycle

Page 6: Technology and Policy Pathways to Net-zero Heavy Industry

Dynamic ques-ons that have to be addressed

1. Material efficiency & circular economy: High poten,al, but what happens if it isn’t easy, cheap, or fast?

2. Electrifica,on: Capacity constraints ma/er and could be very expensive (electric steel example).

3. Carbon capture, u,liza,on, storage: What happens if CCS reservoirs, CCUS opportuni@es in a given region are limited?

4. Alterna,ve heat sources: Regional limits on biomass, solar, etc.

5. What about long-lived legacy facili,es? e.g. Chinese BF-BOFs

6. How can we build situa,on specific technology and policy hybrids to solve for all of the above?

Page 7: Technology and Policy Pathways to Net-zero Heavy Industry

One possibility for heat and feedstocks: Regionally tailored hybrids of electricity, hydrogen, biomass & synthe=c hydrocarbons?

7

Wind, solar,fossil CCS,

nuclear, etc.

Biomass, DAC & CCUS Net-zero carbon & fuels

Keystone chemicals & fuels

Plastics & high value products

Source: Physical and policy pathways to net-zero emissions industry. Bataille, WIRES Interdisciplinary Reviews, 2019.

Allam cycle electricity generaEon using oxycombusEon of fossil CH4

with CCS

Hydrogen use and transport

7

HydrogenDecarbonized

electricity(wind, solar, fossil

CCS, nuclear)

Ammonia (NH3)

Methane (CH4)

Methanol (CH3OH)

Ethanol (C2H5OH)

Bio, lower & net-zero fuel & carbon sources: 1) biomass anaerobic digesEon or fermentaEon; 2)

legacy carbon capture & reuse; 3) biomass gasificaEon; & 4) direct air capture.

Chemical & plastic precursors:Ethane, ethylene, polyethylene etc.

Oxygen

Oxy-combusEon of coal or fossil

methane with CCS

Other tailored end-use and feedstock hydrocarbons (propane/butane (LPG), diesel, jet fuel)

Hydrogen from fossil methane or

coal with CCS

Direct electrificaEon

(O2 for ATR)

Page 8: Technology and Policy Pathways to Net-zero Heavy Industry

8

Source: Bataille, “Physical and policy pathways to low and zero emissions industry”, WILEY Interdisciplinary Reviews, 2019

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

Direct electrifiables

Legacy industry

Firm electricity

Legacy buildings

Iron and steel

Cement/lime

Shipping

Aviation

Fertilizer prod.

Heavy roadfreight

% of energy and process carbon dioxide

Transmission, fossil+CCS, hydro, nuclear, baceries, H2 fuel cells, bio/syn gas turbines?

Retrofit or replace for elec. or H2, or drop-in bio/syn gas replacement

Retrofit or replace for elec. or H2, or drop-in bio/syn gas replacement

Material efficiency, H2 EAF, molten oxide electrolysis, HISARNA+CCS, others

ME, clinker subsEtuEon, CCS, new chemistries

H2/ammonia fuel cell or drop-in bio/syntheEc liquid

Short haul electrify, long haul drop-in bio/synthetic liquid

Switch to net-zero carbon, hydrogen and heat sources

Electrify, fuel cell, hybridize, and/or drop-in bio/syn liquid fuel replacement ???

Poten&al hybrid ac&ons to eliminate 2016 emissions

Page 9: Technology and Policy Pathways to Net-zero Heavy Industry

To make this possible, we need a diversified portfolio (i.e. “toolbox”) of tools to be used based on regional resources and needs

• “Only where necessary” design for cement and steel• Aggressive clinker subs;tu;on -> alterna;ve cement chemistries• High temperature heat pumps • Electrothermal technologies • Electroly;c smel;ng & electric virgin steel produc;on (DRI hydrogen EAF or

molten oxide electrolysis EAF)• Lower cost, more efficient electrolysis for hydrogen (alkaline to PEM or

solid oxide fuel cells, cost/2, efficiency X2?); methane pyrolysis?• Electro-cataly;c and bio-cataly;c instead of thermal processes• Post-combus;on and direct-from-air CO2 capture • Woody biomass gasifica;on to commercialize bulk net-zero carbon sources,

e.g. for methane & chemical feedstocks

Page 10: Technology and Policy Pathways to Net-zero Heavy Industry

Simple carbon pricing and regula=ons are not enough:The challenges are more than technological

• While emerging tech exists, innovation will be slow because:– of low profit margins– competitive; they can’t pass on costs without losing market share– capital costs are focussed and upfront– they often can't capture the benefits of innovation– facility lives are long and turnover is slow– there is no market for more expensive low GHG materials

• Policy for heavy industry needs to target these challenges directly• Fundamentally, this is about reducing and controlling risk

Page 11: Technology and Policy Pathways to Net-zero Heavy Industry

Combined strategies for a “local solution finding” policy package

• A mul;-level policy commitment to transi;on to net-zero GHG industry

• Building code, design & recyclability policies for material efficiency/circularity

• A transi;on pathway planning process including all key stakeholders to assess strategic & tech op;ons, compe;;ve advantages, and uncertain;es

• Accelerated R&D and commercializa;on; create lead markets to build economies of scale w/ green procurement, content regs, supply chain branding, guaranteed pricing & output subsidies (e.g. CfDs)

• Eventual exposure of all sectors to full GHG pricing with compe;;veness protec;on, e.g. border carbon adjustments, to “mine” material efficiencies

• Early re;rement if necessary for long lived, highly GHG intense facili;es

• Suppor6ng ins6tu6ons: Just transi;on; monitoring; electricity, H2 & CCS infrastructure; lifecycle accoun;ng; educa;on; regulatory backdrop

In summary: net-zero industry is possible, but will requireplanning as well as subtle, staged, & stringent policy

Page 12: Technology and Policy Pathways to Net-zero Heavy Industry

DDP-INITIATIVE.ORG

CONTACT

Thank you to Hewlett Foundation, Aspen Global Change Institute, Energy Innovation and all

our authors for making the AGCI workshop and Rissman et al (2018) happen, and RFF for this webinar.

Please send questions to:Email: [email protected] Twitter DM:@chris.bataille

Page 13: Technology and Policy Pathways to Net-zero Heavy Industry

13

Variable electricity demand

Must run electricity demand

Source: Fischedick et al 2014 JCP

Molten oxide electrolysis -> EAF

Hydrogen direct reduced iron -> EAF

Page 14: Technology and Policy Pathways to Net-zero Heavy Industry

Transi>on planning with all key stakeholders

Source: Waisman et al 2019, Nature Climate Change

Make up LONG TERM decarbonization visions; what innovation do we need, how

to market?

Give them numbers & geographic reality so we

know where to build infrastructure

Add up the visions’ numbers; are they net-zero

compliant?

Build adapIve policy around the working vision

Page 15: Technology and Policy Pathways to Net-zero Heavy Industry

15

Source: Physical and policy pathways to net-zero emissions industry. Bataille, WIRES Interdisciplinary Reviews, 2019.

The IEA es=mates up to 26% of cement use and 40% of steel use can be reduced via material efficiency and circularity, but …

But, we have to educate and change incentives for everyone in the manufacturing and construction supply chain

Page 16: Technology and Policy Pathways to Net-zero Heavy Industry

16

This is part of the cement por=on of the database. To the extent possible, it includes a technology descrip=on, readiness and es=mates of capital, opera=ng, energy and other costs.

Page 17: Technology and Policy Pathways to Net-zero Heavy Industry

Legacy long distance NG lineBiorefineries – anaerobic or thermochemical biogas (ex pulp mills?)

Electrolysis-> Hydrogen from direct solar producEon or surplus electricity

Synthesis of renewable CH4 via methanaEon

Solar

Elec

tricit

y

HeatNG grid

Source: “A review of technology and policy deep decarbonizaIon pathway opIons for making energy-intensive industry producIon consistent with the Paris agreement”, Bataille et al (2018) Journal of Cleaner ProducIon

?

Transition and transformation: While new should be net-zero based by the late 2030s, the NG transmission grid could be key to transition of legacy buildings, industry and load following NG electricity generation

?