View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Technology in Literacy: Teacher Wisdom Stories: Cautions and Recommendations for UsingComputer-Related Technologies for Literacy InstructionAuthor(s): Linda D. Labbo, Donald J. Leu, Jr., Charles Kinzer, William H. Teale, DanaCammack, Julia Kara-Soteriou and Ruby SannySource: The Reading Teacher, Vol. 57, No. 3 (Nov., 2003), pp. 300-304Published by: Wiley on behalf of the International Reading AssociationStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20205362 .
Accessed: 24/06/2014 21:55
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
.
Wiley and International Reading Association are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extendaccess to The Reading Teacher.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 62.122.73.17 on Tue, 24 Jun 2014 21:55:02 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
^ecl\no\ogy in
Literacy
Teacher wisdom stories: Cautions and 0 ?
recommendations for using computer-related technologies for literacy instruction
Linda D. Labbo, Donald J. Leu, Jr., Charles Kinzer, William H. Teale, Dana Cammack, Julia Kara-Soteriou, Ruby Sanny
One thing we have come to appreciate during the
years we've spent as educators is the value of what
we call teacher wisdom stories. Teacher wisdom
stories are reflective, insightful, and informative
statements that offer advice about effective class
room teaching and learning. They may take many
forms, from a concisely worded statement to a
lengthy narrative. For example, as teachers eat
lunch they frequently share stories about things that
work or don't work in their classrooms. Some of
the most valuable teacher wisdom stories are about
solutions to problems that teachers have discovered
during struggles to implement new instructional
approaches. Whatever form or forum such stories
take, they all share a common characteristic?the
power to enrich the fortunate listeners with rare in
sights that may inform or even transform their
pedagogy. The purpose of this month's column is to share
teacher wisdom stories and advice about how to ef
fectively use classroom computers for literacy in
struction. We believe this is a timely topic; recent
statistics indicate that teachers want and need to learn
how to use classroom computers more effectively. For example, student access to Internet-connected
computers (as indicated by student-to-computer
ratios) improved from 20 students per computer in
1998 to 5.6 students per computer in 2002 (Ansell & Park, 2003). Computers are readily available in
U.S. schools. However, at least 50% of veteran and
new teachers identify themselves as educational tech
nology novices, and only 42% of new teachers re
cently stated that they feel well prepared to use
computers instructionally (Office of Social &
Economie Data Analysis, 2003). Thus, both veteran
and new teachers need wisdom from expert teachers
to become technologically literate.
The teacher wisdom story statements we pro vide here are drawn from a U.S. survey we con
ducted as one component of a larger study (http:// ctell.uconn.edu/home.htm). The 125 survey partic
ipants included teachers and technology coordina
tors who are technologically literate. Technological
literacy means the ability to use computer-related
technologies to (a) improve productivity, perform ance, and learning and (b) expand the knowledge base to use these tools in content areas so that stu
dents' academic achievement improves (U.S.
Department of Education, 1997).
Although the interview survey focused on K-3
teachers nominated to participate because of their
exemplary use of computers for literacy instruc
tion, the answers could well apply to teachers in
grades 4 to 6 as well. Our research teams at four
universities used qualitative methods to conduct a
content analysis (Miles & Huberman, 1994) of the
online interview and survey responses by grade level. We have reported elsewhere on specific find
ings for each grade level (Labbo, Kinzer, Leu, &
Teale, 2003a, 2003b). Here, we focus on insights, advice, and cautions about computer use that were
mentioned by teachers at all grade levels. Indeed,
many of the suggestions they provide are "caution
ary tales" drawn directly from some of their strug
gles to integrate computer technologies with their
classroom cultures.
300 ? 2003 International Reading Association (pp. 300-304)
This content downloaded from 62.122.73.17 on Tue, 24 Jun 2014 21:55:02 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
When you read the following suggestions,
imagine that you are asking questions about effec
tive classroom computer use as you eat lunch in the
teachers' lounge at an elementary school and that
several colleagues are sharing their wisdom. To
provide the flow of a conversation, a discussion
prompt begins each section, followed by various
teacher voices in the form of quotes and summary statements of key ideas drawn from our survey.
I feel very isolated in my attempts to use
the computer in my classroom. What can I
do? Where can I get good ideas?
We all feel isolated when we first use class
room computers because we typically have too lit
tle guidance or support. I've found that there are
various types of support available to us through staff development, technology personnel, and
Internet resources.
First, I advise you to carefully select and par
ticipate in professional computer-related staff
development opportunities. "[I agree]...staff devel
opment is a major factor in the success of technol
ogy integration and can help prevent computers from being just one more failure in attempting to
assist students." You have an opportunity to shape the content and approach to staff development that
you receive. For example, when I found out that the
only training we would receive at my school was a
Friday afternoon workshop, I talked to my princi
pal and my school technology committee request
ing an approach to staff development that has a
track record of effectiveness. I respectfully remind
ed them that staff development that works involves more than one workshop. Such development re
quires demonstrations of effective computer use,
ongoing mentoring and modeling, hands-on train
ing, sanctioned time to reflect on computer-related activities, giving and receiving targeted feedback, and sustained grade-level collaboration. "[I re
minded my principal that] teachers need adequate time for professional preparation."
Second, I suggest that you ask people in your district exactly what technology support resources
are available to you. Then, record in your lesson
plan book the names and contact information for
the technology coordinator and technology repre sentatives who are available to give guidance or
act as a troubleshooters. If you ask for these names
and discover that no one is available, include the
need for technology support on a list of requests or demands for your administrators.
States and school districts have invested heavily in
placing computers in classrooms, and they want to see
that they are used effectively. Administrators need to
know that...without a good technical support depart ment, teachers are likely to feel frustrated and give up on using the various technologies.
Third, use technology as a resource for your
personally guided professional development. "The
Internet is a useful tool because [teachers] can find
multitudes of information at their fingertips." It is
necessary for us to use computer technologies to
connect with other teachers, to share information, and to update our own pedagogical or content
knowledge.
Technology helps teachers stay current with research
and current event issues. Various technology tools help provide support for teachers to create inspiring and
adaptable instructional materials.
[Teachers need] to learn to be flexible, study what is out there, get on to a listserv of other teachers at their
grade level or area of study to keep current.
Class websites (http://comsewogue.kl 2.ny.us/ ~ssilverman/2000), teacher listservs (www.read
ing.org/publications/rt/rt_listserv.html), profes sional organization sites (www.reading.org/posi
tions/technology.html), and educational portals that
offer lesson plan ideas and computer-related activ
ities (www.internet4classrooms.com/kindergarten_ links.htm) are good technological sources for great
teaching ideas. In addition, if district- or campus level staff development is not offered, resources for
individual professional development are available
online (e.g., www.ed.gov/inits/bestpractices). I
took an online course and learned many exciting
ways to integrate the computer and my classroom
culture without losing my mind in the process.
I know I need to use the computers in my classroom. How can I make sure the
technology is being used well?
Technology should add substantively to your
literacy curriculum and not be used merely for its
own sake. Technology use in the classroom must
Technology in Literacy 301
This content downloaded from 62.122.73.17 on Tue, 24 Jun 2014 21:55:02 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
support or add value to the curriculum and instruc
tional objectives.
One shouldn't use the Internet just because it is there. You should always be sure that you have a purposeful activity for the students and make sure they know what that activity is. Misdirected Internet use can be a waste of valuable instructional time. Organized and purpose ful activities can open doors for students to engage in
enriching and enhanced learning experiences.
Use any technology as a tool, not as a curriculum. Find
ways to integrate technology with existing curriculum; don't try to add another subject into the day.
I find it is best to use these [computer technologies] when they add something to the activity or curricu
lum, not just because the technology exists.
I do not force technology. If it is the best and most
meaningful tool to use, then we take that tool out of our
box. However, if the best way to solve our problem is to
literally use paper and pencil, that is what I pull out.
"Learn management procedures for the one
computer classroom, [the multicomputer class
room], as well as the computer lab." For example, be sure to place one computer in a central class
room location where the entire class can view the
screen. Use this whole-group computer to demon
strate computer applications, navigate the Internet, or celebrate students' work. Make sure that all stu
dents have access to computers throughout the
week. Whether individuals, peer pairs, or small stu
dent groups work at the computer, teachers should
monitor students' opportunities for computer time
through sign-up sheets or daily routines to ensure
that all students have regular access.
I think a specific computer time with individuals as
signed to use the computer should be set up so that all kids have egual access to the computer. This is re
ally important so that all kids have the same experience in the classroom and learn to feel comfortable using the computer.
In addition, don't assume that all children who
step into your classroom have sufficient back
ground in using computers for educational purpos es. While it is true that many children have grown
up with computers and computer games in their
lives, many others do not have computers at home.
Computer access at school then becomes critical
in closing the digital divide between children of
low socioeconomic status and their more affluent
peers. It is imperative for teachers to scaffold chil
dren's use of computers for educational purposes. Learn what students can do with computer
technologies at various grade levels, particularly at
the grade level you teach. Observe children who
are adept at using computer technologies to get a
sense of their capabilities. Through observation,
you can gain insight about their understanding of
literacy.
Right now I use computer programs to observe the abil ities of my students. I watch them playing computer
games and observe how well they understand the di rections [or] find the right letter matches. This gives
me a beginning clue as to their ability levels.
In addition, the National Educational Tech
nology Standards (NETS) for students provide stu
dent learning profiles for grade clusters (pre-K-2, 3-5, 6-8, and 9-12). The standards provide guide lines for what children should be able to do by the
end of the grade cluster. For example, by the end
of second grade, students should know how to use
multimedia resources, including interactive books, multimedia encyclopedias, and educational soft
ware to support their learning. They should be able
to create developmentally appropriate multimedia
products through collaborative effort. They should
be able to solve problems or communicate ideas
with various types of technology tools that include
digital cameras, word-processing programs, and
drawing tools. The NETS standards are available
online (www.iste.org).
What do I need to keep in mind when
using the Internet in the classroom? Are
there any new skills or strategies that
children need to learn when using the
Internet?
Be sure that your school has guidelines for
Internet access and use and share those guidelines with parents and students. Many schools now have
consent forms for parents to sign. The forms high
light guidelines and agreements that students ad
here to when using computers for schoolwork.
If [you are] new to Internet use with kids, seek out oth er teachers who have experience and willingness to
help. Take it slow, participate in Internet projects that fit with your curriculum.
302 The Reading Teacher Vol. 57, No. 3 November 2003
This content downloaded from 62.122.73.17 on Tue, 24 Jun 2014 21:55:02 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Student use of the Internet reguires teacher attention
and supervision.
Teachers and school staff must strive to ensure stu
dent safety.
New literacies include the ability to use a vari
ety of technology resources and tools. For example,
your students need to know how to use e-mail for
authentic purposes. It's important for students to
develop skills keyboarding, navigating, accessing
information, and reflecting on what they read. They also need to learn screen conventions.
I think just as we need to teach children conventions
about the printed word on paper, we also need to teach
them about screen conventions. Digital displays are
everywhere you turn, from the checkout line at the gro
cery store to the ordering display at a fast food restau
rant. These screens contain all kinds of information,
including advertisements. We need to be sure that we
are giving our students the tools to understand that
while these screens contain factual information, we
must also work to make sure they become critical users
of the information these screens contain.
Advertisements on the Web also are distracting, send
cultural messages, and can lead to potentially danger ous sites for kids-be vigilant!
Teachers indicated that new literacies are im
portant for students because they need to think crit
ically and use technology critically, as well as
synthesize and evaluate information. There is a
wealth of information on the Internet; however, it's
not all credible, and teachers need to help students
learn how to critically evaluate websites.
Teachers need to have good electronic literacy skills
themselves and be able to evaluate sites for biases.
When students compare information from different
texts, including electronic encyclopedias and websites,
they practice comprehension skills. Often students will come across texts with inconsistent information. Using the Internet allows them to consult additional re
sources to verify or disprove the facts they find.
Understand that a website may create confusion for
readers. I'm thinking of pages with frames. You track
left to right but not across the whole page.
[Teachers should] learn how to utilize technology for
reading and gathering information, construction of in
formation into a variety of formats, and...to dissemi
nate what the students have learned.
What do I need to know about software?
You need to be familiar with the software avail
able to you, and you need to know how to integrate
technology and the curriculum effectively. The soft
ware used must be developmentally appropriate for
students in order to have an impact on learning.
I feel the programs must be carefully looked at to see if
they are serving the intended purpose and whether
they can/should be used independently or with a
teacher present to facilitate.
I use [computer software] as a way to reinforce skills
already taught. A child experiencing difficulty would
have me sit by his/her side during [computer] center
time to do the program together. This would allow for
assessing his/her needs and reteaching...with or with
out the use of the computer.
Too many bells and whistles and some children lose the
point as they become overly focused on sounds or ani
mations. That is why I have created HyperStudio pro
grams for skill practice. They have the same ability to
engage without the overstimulation.
Using developmentally appropriate digital content
(software and Internet resources) that support the in
structional objective(s) will provide opportunities for
developing higher order reasoning and problem-solving skills.
Most computer programs I use [give students] an op
portunity for free choice. Furthermore, the children are
highly motivated to learn using technology.
The ones that use humor are the most valuable. The
children tend to use them more often and remember
them.
If you are unfamiliar with various types of soft
ware applications you will be unable to integrate
computer activities and the literacy curriculum ef
fectively. Select educational software that aligns with conventional literacy goals, new literacy ob
jectives, and children's individual instructional
needs or that contributes to an overall unit theme or
project. For example, children who cannot read in
dependently require software that will read the text
aloud, use descriptive animations, or offer other
levels of interactive feedback. Reviews of edu
cational software are available online (e.g., www.
superkids.com). Ratings at Superkids Educational
Software Review focus on educational value, ease
of installation, and appeal for children.
Technology in Literacy 303
This content downloaded from 62.122.73.17 on Tue, 24 Jun 2014 21:55:02 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Do you think that computers will ever
replace teachers in the classroom?
No, computers will never replace classroom
teachers because teachers are the key component in
classroom learning.
Computers will never replace teachers in the class room.
Technology is a tool not the teacher.
While computers are becoming more interactive and use immediate reinforcements, I find that they pale in
comparison to one-on-one teaching correspondence
with a living, breathing person with whom a child can converse about word-attack strategies and the meaning the material carries for the child in comprehension.
Technology should be used...as a supplement to,
rather than replacement of, literacy instruction by the
teacher.
What you, the teacher, know and don't know
about using computers matters. Your knowledge about various aspects of using computers has an ef
fect on the benefits your students will get from hav
ing computers in the classroom. Therefore, it's
imperative that you learn as much as you can about
effective computer use for literacy instruction.
Teachers need to evaluate sites and software before
using either in class, and they need to incorporate good teaching while working with students and technology. Technology should be properly utilized in order to be effective and can be used for much more than drill ac
tivities.
Student needs should direct the use of each technology.
The principles of effective technology use, as I see it, would be teacher involvement first and foremost. I be
lieve strongly that the use of computers alone will not
greatly enhance any curriculum. It is only with the care
ful choices made by the teacher that software and web sites will provide children with enriching and useful
experiences.
Labbo is editor of the Technology in Literacy department Leu teaches at the University of Connecticut Kinzer teaches at Columbia
University, New York. Teale teaches at the
University of Illinois at Chicago. Cammack is a doctoral student at Columbia University, New York. Kara-Soteriou teaches at the University of Bridgeport, Connecticut Sanny is a doctoral student at the University of Illinois at Chicago. This project was supported by National Science Foundation Grant No. 0089221.
References
Ansell, S.E., & Park, J. (2003). Tracking tech trends: Student
computer use grows, but teachers need training. Education Week's Technology Counts, 22(35), 43-48.
Labbo, L.D., Kinzer, C.K., Leu, DJ., & Teale, W.H. (2003a,
May). CTELL: Case Technologies in Literacy Learning. Paper presented at the 48th annual convention of the
International Reading Association, Orlando, FL
Labbo, L.D., Kinzer, C.K., Leu, D.L., & Teale, W.H. (2003b,
May). Kids, computers and literacy learning: Stepping into K-3 classrooms. Paper presented at the 48th an
nual convention of the International Reading Association, Orlando, FL.
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analy sis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Office of Social & Economic Data Analysis. (2003, January).
Analysis of 2002 MAP results for eMINTS students.
Retrieved May 27, 2003, from http://emints.more.net/
evaluation/reports/map2002.pdf U.S. Department of Education. (1997). President Clinton's
call to action for American education in the 21st century:
Technological literacy. Retrieved May 23, 2001, from
http://www.ed.qov/updates/PresEDPIan/part11.html
The department editor welcomes reader comments on this
column E-mail [email protected]. Write to Linda D. Labbo, The University of Georgia, 309 Aderhold Hall, Athens, GA
30602, USA.
V_/
304 The Reading Teacher Vol. 57, No. 3 November 2003
This content downloaded from 62.122.73.17 on Tue, 24 Jun 2014 21:55:02 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions